Minutes 14 from August 3-4, 2016 Meeting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minutes 14 from August 3-4, 2016 Meeting 1 GULF OF MEXICO FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 2 3 JOINT MEETING OF THE SPECIAL CORAL SCIENTIFIC AND STATISTICAL 4 COMMITTEE AND CORAL AND SHRIMP ADVISORY PANELS 5 6 Gulf Council Office Tampa, Florida 7 8 September 16, 2019 9 10 CORAL AP VOTING MEMBERS 11 J.P. Brooker....................................Ocean Conservancy 12 Scott Hickman.......................................Galveston, TX 13 Morgan Kilgour..........................................Sacto, CA 14 Shelly Krueger.......................................Key West, FL 15 Rob Ruzicka....................................St. Petersburg, FL 16 Portia Sapp.................................................FDACS 17 18 SPECIAL CORAL SSC VOTING MEMBERS 19 Sandra Brooke......................................St. Teresa, FL 20 Paul Sammarco...........................................Houma, LA 21 G.P. Schmahl..............................Flower Garden Banks NMS 22 23 SHRIMP AP VOTING MEMBERS 24 Corky Perret...................................................MS 25 Steven Bosarge.....................................Pascagoula, MS 26 Thu Bui.............................................Lafayette, LA 27 Glenn Delaney............................Southern Shrimp Alliance 28 Gary Graham..........................................Brazoria, TX 29 Harris Lasseigne................................New Braunfels, TX 30 Lance Nacio..........................................Montegut, LA 31 Thomas Shultz..........................................Biloxi, MS 32 Thomas Shultz, Jr..............................................MS 33 Franklin Parker........................................Biloxi, MS 34 John Williams..................................Tarpon Springs, FL 35 36 STAFF 37 Zeenatul Basher.......................Coral and Habitat Biologist 38 Matt Freeman............................................Economist 39 John Froeschke....................................Deputy Director 40 Lisa Hollensead.................................Fishery Biologist 41 Natasha Mendez-Ferrer...........................Fishery Biologist 42 Camilla Shireman........Administrative & Communications Assistant 43 Carrie Simmons.................................Executive Director 44 45 OTHER PARTICIPANTS 46 Heather Blough...............................................NMFS 47 Leann Bosarge...............................................GMFMC 48 David Dale...................................................NMFS 1 1 Kenneth Daniels......................................Seminole, FL 2 Beth Dieveney...............................................FKNMS 3 Benny Gallaway.................................LGL Ecological, TX 4 Susan Gerhart................................................NMFS 5 Frank Helies.................................................NMFS 6 Sharon McBreen..............................Pew Charitable Trusts 7 Kelli O’Donnell..............................................NMFS 8 Lauren Waters................................................NMFS 9 Stephen Werndli.............................................FKNMS 10 11 - - - 12 2 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 Table of Contents................................................2 4 5 Table of Motions.................................................3 6 7 Introduction of Members..........................................5 8 9 Election of Coral Advisory Panel Chair and Vice Chair............8 10 11 Adoption of Agenda...............................................9 12 13 Approval of Joint Shrimp AP, Coral AP, and Coral SSC Minutes 14 from August 3-4, 2016 Meeting....................................12 15 16 Update on the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary 17 Expansion........................................................12 18 19 Update on the Implementation Status of Coral 9...................42 20 21 Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Expansion.................43 22 23 Presentation on Stony Coral Tissue Loss Disease..................110 24 25 Other Business...................................................132 26 Discussion of the Decline of Nesting of the Kemps-Ridley 27 Sea Turtle...............................................132 28 Discussion of Beginning Coral Amendment 10..................136 29 30 Coral Reef Conservation Program Update...........................147 31 32 Adjournment......................................................152 33 34 - - - 35 3 1 TABLE OF MOTIONS 2 3 PAGE 38: Motion to request that the NOAA sanctuary agency 4 provide the language on transiting through the sanctuary. The 5 motion carried on page 39. 6 7 PAGE 79: Motion to request that staff include all relevant 8 information regarding shrimp effort point data for the FKNMS 9 expansion, not just the point data in the GMFMC jurisdiction, 10 for consideration for making recommendations about the FKNMS 11 expansion. The motion carried on page 81. 12 13 PAGE 91: Shrimp AP only motion to oppose the proposed 14 northwestern expansion of the FKNMS boundary. The motion 15 carried on page 97. 16 17 PAGE 106: Shrimp AP only motion that the Shrimp AP is not in 18 favor of the FKNMS southern boundary expansion. The motion 19 carried on page 110. 20 21 PAGE 132: Motion that, given the unexpected substantial 22 declines in nesting activity in Mexico in 2018 and 2019, there 23 is a critical need for a stock assessment update for Kemp's 24 Ridley sea turtles performed by competent sea turtle experts. 25 This stock assessment should address, among other things, if, 26 how, and to what degree density dependence, the 2010 Deep Water 27 Horizon spill, and marine debris may be contributing to this 28 decline. The motion carried on page 136. 29 30 PAGE 136: Coral AP and Coral SSC only motion to have the Gulf 31 Council start work on Coral Amendment 10. The motion carried on 32 page 147. 33 34 - - - 35 36 4 1 The Joint Special Coral Scientific and Statistical Committee and 2 Coral and Shrimp Advisory Panels of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery 3 Management Council convened at the Gulf Council Office on Monday 4 morning, September 16, 2019, and was called to order by Dr. 5 Natasha Mendez-Ferrer. 6 7 INTRODUCTION OF MEMBERS 8 9 DR. NATASHA MENDEZ-FERRER: Good morning, everybody. First of 10 all, I would like everybody to introduce themselves. I also 11 want to mention that this meeting will be transcribed, and so, 12 before you speak, please say your name, so that that can be 13 included in the documents. My name is Natasha Mendez-Ferrer, 14 and I am a fishery biologist with the Gulf Council, and we 15 continue introducing ourselves to my right. 16 17 MS. SHELLY KRUEGER: Good morning. My name is Shelly Krueger, 18 and I am the Florida Sea Grant agent in the Florida Keys for the 19 University of Florida IFAS Extension. 20 21 MR. SCOTT HICKMAN: Captain Scott Hickman from Galveston, Texas, 22 a thirty-five-year professional charter boat fisherman and 23 commercial fisherman, and I’m currently the Chair of the Flower 24 Garden Banks Advisory Council. 25 26 MR. G.P. SCHMAHL: Good morning. My name is G.P. Schmahl, and I 27 am the Superintendent of the Flower Garden Banks National Marine 28 Sanctuary based out of Galveston, Texas. 29 30 DR. MORGAN KILGOUR: Morgan Kilgour, and I am a Senior 31 Environmental Scientist with the State of California, but I’m 32 here because I have a lot of vested interest in corals in the 33 Gulf of Mexico. 34 35 DR. SANDRA BROOKE: Sandra Brooke, Florida State University, and 36 I’m a coral ecologist, and I’m on the Coral SSC. 37 38 MS. PORTIA SAPP: Portia Sapp, and I’m with the Florida 39 Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and I’m the 40 Director of the Division of Aquaculture. 41 42 MR. FRANK PARKER: Frank Parker, and I’m a commercial fisherman 43 from Biloxi, Mississippi, and I’m on the Shrimp AP. 44 45 MR. STEVE BOSARGE: I’m Steve Bosarge, and I’m a commercial 46 fisherman and Vice Chair of the Shrimp AP, and I’m a 47 commissioner with the Department of Marine Resources, and I’ve 48 been doing this for a long time, and I’m looking forward to the 5 1 meeting. 2 3 MR. LANCE NACIO: I’m Lance Nacio, Anna Marie Seafood, and I’ve 4 a shrimp boat, and I have a reef fish boat, and I’ve been doing 5 it for a while. 6 7 MS. THU BUI: Thu Bui, and I’m with Louisiana Sea Grant and LSU 8 Ag Center, and I’m a Marine Extension personnel. 9 10 MR. HARRIS LASSEIGNE: Harris Lasseigne from New Braunfels, 11 Texas, retired commercial fisherman, invested in all phases of 12 the shrimp industry. 13 14 MR. CORKY PERRET: Corky Perret, Chairman of the Shrimp AP from 15 Poplarville, Mississippi. 16 17 MS. LEANN BOSARGE: Leann Bosarge, voting member on the Gulf 18 Council, serving as the liaison for the Shrimp AP meeting today. 19 20 MR. JOHN WILLIAMS: John Williams, Executive Director of the 21 Southern Shrimp Alliance. 22 23 MR. GARY GRAHAM: I’m Gary Graham, and I’m retired from Texas 24 Sea Grant as a fisheries specialist, and I’m also involved in 25 the commercial shrimp fishery. 26 27 MR. PAUL SAMMARCO: Paul Sammarco, and I’m Professor Emeritus at 28 Louisiana University’s Marine Consortium, or LUMCON, in 29 Louisiana, and coral reefs are my thing. 30 31 MR. THOMAS SHULTZ, JR: Thomas Shultz, commercial fisherman from 32 Biloxi, Mississippi. 33 34 DR. MATTHEW FREEMAN: Matt Freeman, one of the council staff 35 economists and the staff liaison for the Shrimp AP. 36 37 DR. ZEENATUL BASHER: Zeenatul Basher, and I’m the Coral Reef 38 and Habitat Biologist for the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management 39 Council. 40 41 DR. MENDEZ-FERRER: We can continue with the members that are in 42 the back, and can we turn on the microphone? 43 44 DR.
Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mouthpiece
    Our Web Page The Mouthpiece www.activedivers. org/ May 2003 THE ACTIVE DIVERS ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER April-May Dive Schedule Sat. 4-26 PM North Key Largo Sites may include: The Christ of the Abyss, the Elbow, N. Dry Rocks, N. N. Dry Rocks, Grecian Rocks, Carysfort, Shark Reef. Average depth 30’, usually no current. Average visibility is 30-50’ with many tropi- cals, morays, cudas. Sun. 5-4 PM Islamorada Just 4 miles past Tavernier, sites may include: Hammerhead, The Canyon, El I nfante, Crocker, No Name, The Valley Aquarium, Alligator. Average depth 30-40’, visibility 40-50’. Some current, many fish, shallow wrecks Sat. 5-10 PM Tavernier Sites may include: Conch Reef, Davis Ledge, Hens & Chickens, Little Conch, Capt. Tom’s Ledge, 40’ Ledge, Fish Trap, Horseshoe. Average depth 30’, average visibility 40-60’, many morays, schooling tropicals, un- usual pillar corals. Sat. 5-17 AM Biscayne Park (inc tanks) Sites may include: Rocky Reef, Elkhorn Forest, Ball Buoy, Far Out Reef, Cuda Ledge. Usually no currents, massive corals, small caves. The Keys “Best Kept Secret”, only one commercial boat allowed in area. Depth 20-30’, vis 30-60’. Sat. 5-24 PM Tenneco Towers (Advanced) Choice of more than 40 wrecks. Some unlike anywhere else: Jet airliner, M-60 Tanks, Tankers, Freighters, Tugs, Barges. Most are intact with penetration possible. Average depth 90’, visibility 40-50’. Expect cur- rents and dramatic profiles, many fish. See advanced criterion this issue. All Dives $35.00 New for 2003! Members may now take advantage of NEW DIVE PACS and freeze 2002 prices for this year! Look at these savings 10 packs—10 dives for only $290 Save up To $60 5 packs—5 dives for only $150 Save up to $25 You may use these pacs for any local dive except Biscayne National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Communities at Two Remote Pacific Coral Reefs: Effects of Reef
    Benthic communities at two remote Pacific coral reefs: eVects of reef habitat, depth, and wave energy gradients on spatial patterns Gareth J. Williams1,7 , Jennifer E. Smith1,7 , Eric J. Conklin2, Jamison M. Gove3,4 , Enric Sala5,6 and Stuart A. Sandin1 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 2 The Nature Conservancy, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 3 Coral Reef Ecosystem Division, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, USA 4 Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 5 National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA 6 Centre d’Estudis Avanc¸ats de Blanes (CSIC), Blanes, Spain 7 These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Kingman Reef and Palmyra Atoll in the central Pacific are among the most re- mote coral reefs on the planet. Here we describe spatial patterns in their benthic communities across reef habitats and depths, and consider these in the context of oceanographic gradients. Benthic communities at both locations were dominated by calcifying organisms (54–86% cover), namely hard corals (20–74%) and crustose coralline algae (CCA) (10–36%). While turf algae were relatively common at both locations (8–22%), larger fleshy macroalgae were virtually absent at Kingman (<1%) and rare at Palmyra (0.7–9.3%). Hard coral cover was higher, but with low diversity, in more sheltered habitats such as Palmyra’s backreef and Kingman’s patch reefs. Al- most exclusive dominance by slow-growing Porites on Kingman’s patch reefs provides indirect evidence of competitive exclusion, probably late in a successional sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Tagging and Tracking of Coral Reef Fishes from the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory
    TECHNICAL NOTE In Situ Tagging and Tracking of Coral Reef Fishes from the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory AUTHORS ABSTRACT James Lindholm We surgically implanted coded-acoustic transmitters in a total of 46 coral reef fish Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary; during a saturation mission to the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory in August 2002. Current address: Pfleger Institute of Aquarius is located within the Conch Reef Research Only Area, a no-take marine re- Environmental Research serve in the northern Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Over the course of 10 Sarah Fangman days, with daily bottom times of 7 hrs, saturation diving operations allowed us to col- Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary lect, surgically tag, release, and subsequently track fishes entirely in situ. Fish were collected using baited traps deployed adjacent to the reef as well as nets manipulated Les Kaufman on the bottom by divers. Surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters was conducted Boston University Marine Program at a mobile surgical station that was moved to different sites across the reef. Each fish Steven Miller was revived from anesthetic and released as divers swam the fish about the reef. Short- National Undersea Research Center, term tracking of tagged fish was conducted by saturation divers, while long-term fish University of North Carolina at Wilmington movement was recorded by a series of acoustic receivers deployed on the seafloor. Though not designed as an explicit comparison with surface tagging operations, the benefits of working entirely in situ were apparent. INTRODUCTION he use of acoustic telemetry to track the movements of marine fishes is now a com- true with deepwater fishes that have air blad- fish with a damp towel.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquarius Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet: 2019 Designer: Perry Submarine Builders (Florida) Construction: Victoria Machine Works (Texas); start: 1986 | complete: 1987 Estimated construction cost: $5.5M Operational Timeline: St. Croix Deployment: Deployment in Salt River Canyon, St. Croix: 1987 Owner: NOAA Operator: Farleigh Dickenson University Interim Period: Recovered: 1990 by the University of North Carolina Wilmington Refurbished: 1990-1993 at North Carolina State Ports, Wilmington, NC Owner: NOAA Operator: University of North Carolina Wilmington Florida Keys Deployment: Initial deployment on Conch Reef, Florida Keys: 1993 (baseplate deployed 1992) Recovered for refurbishment: 1996-1998 - Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Ft. Pierce, FL Redeployment on Conch Reef, Florida Keys: 1998 – present Owner: NOAA: 1986-2014; Florida International University: 2014 – present Operator: FDU: 1987-1989; UNCW: 1990-2012; Florida International University: 2013 - present Aquarius Siting: Conch Reef, Florida Keys (Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary): Distance From Islamorada shore base: 15.4 km (8.5 nm) Distance offshore: 9 km (5.4 nm) Hatch depth/storage depth: 14 m (46 fsw) 35 psi Depth of bottom directly below Aquarius: 18 m (60 fsw) (updated: 09.15.19) Habitat Specifications: Aquarius weight: 82-ton double-lock pressure vessel Baseplate weight: 120 tons Dimensions: 14-meters long by 3-meters in diameter (46 ft x 10 ft) Crew: 4 scientists and 2 technicians Amenities: kitchen facilities that include a microwave, instant hot water dispenser, refrigerator, sink, dining
    [Show full text]
  • The Isotopic Composition of Respired Carbon Dioxide in Scleractinian Corals: Implications for Cycling of Organic Carbon in Corals
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 69, No. 6, pp. 1495–1509, 2005 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/05 $30.00 ϩ .00 doi:10.1016/j.gca.2004.09.004 The isotopic composition of respired carbon dioxide in scleractinian corals: Implications for cycling of organic carbon in corals 1, 2 3 4 3 5 PETER K. SWART *, ALINA SZMANT ,JAMES W. PORTER ,RICHARD E. DODGE ,JENNIFER I. TOUGAS , and JOHN R. SOUTHAM 1Division of Marine Geology and Geophysics, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA 2Center for Marine Science, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 5600 Marvin Moss Lane, Wilmington, NC 28409, USA 3Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA 4National Coral Reef Institute, Nova Southeastern University, Dania, FL, USA 5Department of Geological Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33129, USA (Received March 18, 2004; accepted in revised form September 10, 2004) Abstract—The origin of ␦13C variations within the skeletons of zooxanthellate scleractinian corals is still a ␦13 matter of considerable debate. In particular, the role respired CO2 plays in controlling the eventual Cofthe ␦13 skeleton remains unclear. In this study, the temporal variability of the C of respired CO2 produced by Montastraea faveolata has been measured at approximately monthly intervals over a 1-year period. In these experiments, three corals maintained on a platform at 8 m depth near Molasses Reef in the Florida Keys were incubated in closed chambers for 24-h periods and samples of the incubation water analyzed for the ␦13Cof ⌺ ϳ the dissolved inorganic carbon ( CO2)at 3-h intervals.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Marine Zoning and Regulatory Review
    Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Marine Zoning and Regulatory Review Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Briefing Beth Dieveney Sanctuary Deputy Superintendent for Science and Policy June 10, 2015 Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary 1990 - Congress passed Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Protection Act 1997 - Management Plan, Zoning Scheme, and Regulations Implemented 2001 - Tortugas Ecological Reserve added Working to Protect Florida Keys Marine Resources Coral Reef Ecosystem: Coastal Maritime Heritage and Mangroves, Seagrass Beds and Submerged Cultural Coral Reefs Resources What types of things do the Sanctuary and Refuge regulate? • Dumping / Discharges • Spearfishing • Fishing • Vessel Speed • Personal Watercraft • Vessel Access • Groundings • Marine Construction & Dredging • Oil and Gas Development • Touching / Standing on Coral • Diving / Snorkeling • Marine Life / Aquarium Collection Existing Marine Zoning Plan • Sanctuary Wide Regulations • Existing Management Areas (Looe Key/Key Largo NMS & Refuges) • Sanctuary Preservation Areas • Ecological Reserves • Wildlife Management Areas • Special Use Areas – Research Only • Area To Be Avoided: Large Ships >50m 2011 FKNMS Condition Report: Foundation for Regulatory and Zoning Changes • Over 40 scientists provided input and underwent peer review for publication • History of discharges, coastal development, habitat loss, and over exploitation of large fish and keystone species • Poaching, vessel groundings and discharging of marine debris • Can be improved with long
    [Show full text]
  • Key West Mayor Craig Cates and Commissioners Teri Anticipates a Good Year
    * Back in prison Coffee to go A Marathon father and daughter say their new A judge hands down a two-year sentence to an admitted drive-through coffee shop is everything they’d killer acquitted of a Florida Keys pot charge. Story, 3A hoped. Story, 5A WWW.KEYSNET.COM WEDNESDAY,OCTOBER 12, 2011 VOLUME 58, NO. 82 ● 25 CENTS MIDDLE KEYS MARATHON Zip-line course gets opposition the Caribbean, Hawaii and New group says other tourist destinations threatened bird around the globe. Curlee is one of a handful would be harmed of people to speak against the idea at recent City Council By RYAN McCARTHY meetings. The council has [email protected] applied for $735,000 in Community Development A group of Keys residents Block Grant funding through has formed a coalition, Keep the state Department of Crane Point Natural, bent on Community Affairs — now stopping Crane Point part of the Department of Hammock in Marathon from Economic Opportunity — to building a zip-line course. help build the $1.1 million “We are basically advo- course. cates to keep Crane Point nat- Keep Crane Point Natural’s ural. In other words, not with main point of contention is the a zip line intruding with the harm it says a zip line would wildlife, butterflies and birds. do to the threatened white- We’re going to lobby [the crowned pigeon. Kenneth state] against putting it in,” Meyer, executive director of Cudjoe Key resident Deborah the Avian Research and Curlee said. Conservation Institute in Zip lines are basically Gainesville, wrote a Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scientific Forum on the Gulf of Mexico: the Islands in the Stream Concept
    Proceedings: Gulf of Mexico Science Forum A Scientific Forum on the Gulf of Mexico: The Islands in the Stream Concept Proceedings of the Forum: 23 January 2008 Keating Education Center Mote Marine Laboratory Sarasota, Florida Proceedings: Gulf of Mexico Science Forum Table of Contents Forward (Ernest Estevez) .............................................................................................................4 Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................6 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................9 Organizing Committee ................................................................................................................9 Welcome and Introduction (Kumar Mahadevan and Daniel J. Basta) .....................................10 Introduction to the Forum (Billy D. Causey)...........................................................................12 Summary of Scientific Forum (John Ogden) ...........................................................................14 Panel 1: The Geological Setting...............................................................................................17 Geologic Underpinnings of the “Islands in the Stream”; West Florida Margin (Albert Hine and Stanley Locker)...............................................17 Shelf Edge of the Northwest Gulf of Mexico (Niall Slowey).............................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity of Pulley Ridge with Remote Locations As Inferred From
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans RESEARCH ARTICLE Connectivity of Pulley Ridge With Remote Locations as 10.1029/2018JC014057 Inferred From Satellite-Tracked Drifter Trajectories Key Points: • Historical drifter data reveal M. J. Olascoaga1 , P. Miron1 , C. Paris1 , P. Pérez-Brunius2 , R. Pérez-Portela1 , oceanographic connectivity pathways 3 1 within the Gulf of Mexico R. H. Smith , and A. Vaz • The uncovered pathways constitute 1 2 a first-order constraint for any Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA, Centro de surface tracer (e.g., spilled oil, toxic Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California, México, 3NOAA-AOML, Physical algae bloom, buoyant egg masses) Oceanography Division, Miami, FL, USA • Drifter data suggest the importance of Pulley Ridge mesophotic reef as a refugium for the Gulf of Mexico Abstract Using historical (1994–2017) satellite-tracked surface drifter trajectory data, we conduct a probabilistic Lagrangian circulation study which sheds light on the connectivity of Pulley Ridge with other Correspondence to: locations in the Gulf of Mexico and adjacent areas. The analysis reveals that Pulley Ridge is connected with M. J. Olascoaga, [email protected] the North Atlantic, the Caribbean Sea, and most of the Gulf of Mexico. Preferred connecting pathways are identified and arrival times to potential reef sites computed. The study demonstrates the importance of Pulley Ridge as a source for neighboring regions like the Dry Tortugasa, the Florida Keys, Campeche Bank, Citation: and the east Florida coast as well as a self-recruitment area for species with short competence time.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
    Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Review and Discussion February 19, 2020 IJ Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission This is a review and discussion of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary’s (FKNMS) Restoration Blueprint, the FWC’s role in managing the fisheries resources within the FKNMS, proposed regulatory actions, and next steps. Division: Marine Fisheries Management Authors: Jessica McCawley, John Hunt, Martha Guyas, and CJ Sweetman Contact Phone Number: 850-487-0554 Report date: February 17, 2020 Unless otherwise noted, images throughout the presentation are by FWC or Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. FKNMS Process Reminder • Oct. and Dec. - FKNMS discussions • Jan. - FWC staff meetings with diverse stakeholder organizations • Today - Look at all relevant aspects of plan and consider FWC's proposed response • April - FWC comments due • Summer 2020 - FWC begin rulemaking process for state waters As a management partner in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS), FWC has been engaged in review of the Restoration Blueprint (Draft Environmental Impact Statement, DEIS) over the past several months. In October and December, the Commission discussed the FKNMS Restoration Blueprint. In January, FWC staff met with a variety of stakeholders to better understand their comments on particular issues addressed within the DEIS. Today, the presentation will cover all relevant aspects of the plan and staff recommendations based on a review of the science and stakeholder comments, which will be outlined in the next two slides. FWC requested and has been granted an extension for submitting agency comments to the FKNMS until April. Following the Commission’s response to the FKNMS, FWC will consider rulemaking for fisheries management items state waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusks Background the Florida Keys Marine Ecosystem Supports a Diverse Fauna of Mollusks Belonging to Several Orders
    2010 Quick Look Report: Miller et al. VII. Abundance and Size of Selected Mollusks Background The Florida Keys marine ecosystem supports a diverse fauna of mollusks belonging to several orders. Opisthobranch mollusks, for example, are represented by at least 30 species of sea slugs (Sacoglossa) and 23 species of nudibranchs (Nudibranchia) (Clark and DeFreese 1987; Levy et al. 1996), including at least three endemic species (Clark 1994). Data on the status and trends of mollusk populations and habitat utilization patterns in the Florida Keys, with the exception of queen conch (Strombus gigas), are generally limited (Marcus 1960; Jensen and Clark 1983; Clark and DeFreese 1987), as most previous studies have been qualitative in nature (Clark 1994; Trowbridge 2002). Clark (1994) noted a declining population trend for the lettuce sea slug, Elysia (Tridachia) crispata Mörch (see cladistic analyses in Gosliner 1995; Jensen 1996) in southern Florida, based upon qualitative comparisons of occurrence and population densities between 1969-80 and 1987-93. About 50% of the nearshore populations assessed by Clark (1994) nearly 17 years ago were declining due to habitat destruction, siltation, eutrophication, and over- collection, particularly evident in nearshore habitats. Since 2001, we have conducted intermittent surveys of various gastropod mollusk species in conjunction with assessments of other benthic variables. For example, we encountered unusually high densities of lettuce sea slugs among 63 shallow fore reef sites during June-September 2001. While sacoglossans are not particularly rare in many shallow-water marine habitats where densities correlate with algal biomass (Clarke and DeFreese 1987), our observations offshore were considered unusual because fleshy algal cover tends to be relatively low (Chiappone et al.
    [Show full text]