The Catholic Lawyer Volume 16 Number 4 Volume 16, Autumn 1970, Number 4 Article 3 The Two Laws in Thomas More: A Preliminary Reading of the Canon and Common Laws in His Career and Writings R.J. Schoeck Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Catholic Studies Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. THE TWO LAWS IN THOMAS MORE: A PRELIMINARY READING OF THE CANON AND COMMON LAWS IN HIS CAREER AND WRITINGS' R. J. SCHOECK* INTRODUCTION T IS TOO EARLY in the day for most of us to begin with the Nineteenth Century English jurist's observation that "the state of a man's mind is as much a fact as the state of his digestion," and in any case we should want a text a little closer to More's time. In 1477, Chief Justice Brian said that, "It is common knowledge that the thought of man should not be tried, for the Devil himself knoweth not the thought of man"-or, in Law-French, "Comen erudition est l'entent d'un home ne sert trie, car * Attended McGill University (no degree); M.A., Ph.D. Princeton University, 1949. The author, who has been professor of English at St. Michael's College, University of Toronto (1961-1971), is now Director of Research, Folger Shake- speare Library, Washington, D.C.