A List of Whose Shoes?® Customers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CUSTOMER LIST Region Customer North East England Darlington Association on Disability Durham County Council Gateshead Council Home Group North West England Alternative Futures Group Blackburn with Darwen Council Cheshire East Council CLS Manchester City Council Manchester Metropolitan University NHS Stockport Stockport MBC PSS Liverpool Tameside Council University of Central Lancs University of Manchester University of Cumbria Yorkshire and the Humber Bradford City Council Doncaster MBC North Lincs. County Council Nucleus Care Navigation Phoenix Support Group Rotherham MBC Shared Lives, Wakefield UBU The East Midlands De Montfort University Derby City Council Leicester City Council Leicestershire County Council Lincolnshire County Council Northants County Council Nottingham City Council Notts County Council West Midlands Accord Housing Assoc Ltd Birmingham City Council Colebridge Trust Enrych (Formerly Rydyer Cheshire Volunteers) ExtraCare Charitable Trust NEW College, Worcestershire Sandwell Council Solihull MBC* Staffordshire County Council Stoke-on-Trent Council Telford and Wrekin Council University of Wolverhampton Walsall College Walsall Council Warwickshire County Council Wolverhampton Haven Worcestershire Care Group Worcestershire County Council The East of England Cambridgeshire County Council Hertfordshire County Council Luton Borough Council Southend Council Thurrock Council Greater London Harrow Assoc. of Disabled People (HAD) London Borough of Barnet London Borough of Newham London Borough of Havering London Borough of Redbridge London Borough of Slough London Borough of Sutton London Borough of Waltham Forest London Cyrenians Housing Outlook Care Together South East England Buckinghamshire County Council Canterbury Christchurch University Cherwell Care Hampshire County Council Kent County Council Milton Keynes Council Social Work Inclusion Group / Portsmouth University South West England Brunelcare Cornwall County Council Devon County Council Guinness Care & Support Plymouth City Council South Gloucestershire Council UWE, Bristol West Sussex County Council All Regions Careforce Heritage Care Macmillan Cancer Support Multiple Sclerosis Society National Autistic Society RIPFA Skills for Care Think Local, Act Personal (TLAP) - Partners Scotland Dumfries & Galloway Council East Dunbartonshire Council Enable Scotland GSCPF (Glasgow Providers) Wales Anglesey County Council Cardiff University Gwynedd Council Monmouthshire County Council National Leadership & Innovation Agency for Healthcare (NLIAH) University of Bangor Associates of Nutshell Approved Whose Shoes?® facilitators Communications Ltd The Whose Shoes?® logo is subject to UK Trade Mark No. 2502651. The Whose Shoes?® board version is subject to UK Registered Design No. 4009563..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

COVID-19 Bi-Weekly Bristol Statistics Update Tuesday 20 October 2020
COVID-19 bi-weekly Bristol statistics update Tuesday 20 October 2020 We aim to publish a COVID-19 bi-weekly Bristol statistics update twice a week, on Tuesday and Friday afternoons. This may be delayed until the following day, depending on when data is made available. These numbers and rates do change daily but were accurate when published on the date stated on the report. Summary Bristol's rate of 211.7 new cases per 100,000 population in the last 7 days (up to the 16th October) is considerably higher than for the previous 7 days (135.9 per 100,000). The reported rate represents 981 positive cases reported for Bristol over the past 7 days within a population of over 463,000 people. The trend is very clearly moving upwards both locally and nationally and the Bristol rate remains above England rate of 170.8 per 100,000 and is now ranked 46th among 149 English local authorities. Bristol is a Tier 1 area in the new national assessment system. This means we must continue to adhere to national instructions and guidelines. We are closely monitoring any changes and are considering the situation carefully. The regional R number remains at the same level as last week: a range of 1.3 – 1.6 reflecting the rise in cases locally and nationally. The range of R is above 1 indicating the epidemic is increasing. The majority of the increase in new cases are in younger age groups, and reflect schools returning and universities opening. However, we are also seeing a rise cases in working age adults .
[Show full text]
Add Presentation Title Here
EDRM - Why BBW Choose OpenText A solution and Partner to deliver benefits • EDRMs to meet our needs for the whole organisation and beyond – For BBW – For NTC across all retained services – Joining up processes with mutli-agency collaboration • A partner with proven expertise and Local Government reference ability – BBW have OpenText tools (training communications etc) already developed with other Councils that can accelerate implementation (and hence benefits) • A partner rated highly by independent analysts – Gartner, Forrester and others • A partner who the BBW team have used before BBW are confident that OpenText will help achieve benefits in our services and support similar levels of savings for NTC. It will also support multi agency collaboration as a potential income stream to NTC % of the 90 Fortune 500 Companies are leveraging Enterprise Information Management (EIM) from OpenText to turn vision into reality $1 20 Billion years Global of Innovation Revenue $1 5000 # EIM Billion R&D Investment # of Employees 50k 141 60 Countries Offices around the world # of Customers # Supported Customers (by Industry) Food & Beverage Financial Services Oil & Gas Pharmaceuticals Transportation Government Media Legal Manufacturing Examples of Local Government Customers London Borough of Ealing Stockport Metropolitan BC Mid Sussex District Council London Borough of Haringey Buckinghamshire County Council Cambridge City Council London Borough of Hounslow Central Bedfordshire East Hertfordshire District Council London Borough of Merton Cornwall County
[Show full text]
List of Councils in England by Type
List of councils in England by type There are a total of 353 councils in England: Metropolitan districts (36) London boroughs (32) plus the City of London Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly County councils (27) District councils (201) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croydon 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
[Show full text]
Table 1. School Admissions Reforms: Documentation Appendix Manipulable (More Or Allocation System Year from to Less?) Source References
Table 1. School Admissions Reforms: Documentation Appendix Manipulable (More or Allocation System Year From To Less?) Source References (1) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila and Tayfun Sonmez. 2003. "School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach." American Economic Review , 101(1): 399‐410. (2) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin Roth and Tayfun Sonmez. 2005. "The Boston Public Schools Match." American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 96: 368‐371. (3) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin E. Roth, and Tayfun Sonmez. 2006. "Changing the Boston Mechanism: Strategy‐proofness as Equal Access." NBER Working Paper 11965. (4) Cook, Gareth. 2003. "School Assignment Flaws Detailed: Two economists study problem, offer relief." Boston Boston Public Schools (K, 6, 9) 2005 Boston GS Less A,B,E Globe, September 12. (5) BPS. 2002‐2010. "Introducing the Boston Public Schools." (1) Rossi, Rosalind. 2009. "8th Graders' Shot at Elite High Schools Better." Chicago Sun‐Times, November 12. (2) CPS, 2009. "Post Consent Decree Assignment Plan." Office of Academic Enhancement, November 11. (3) Chicago Public Schools. 2009. "New Admissions Process: Frequently Asked Questions." (describes the advice 4 4 Chicago Selective High Schools 2009 Boston SD Less A,B,C for re‐ranking schools). (1) CPS. 2010. "Guidelines for Magnet and Selective Enrollment Admissions for the 2011‐2012 School Year." November 29. (2) Joseph, Abigayil and Katie Ellis, 2010. "Refinements to 2011‐2012 Selective Enrollment and Magnet School Admission Policy." November 4. (3) CPS, 2011. "Application to Selective Enrollment High 4 6 2010 SD SD Less A,B,C Schools." Available at www.cpsoae.org, Last accessed December 28, 2011. (1) Ajayi, Kehinde.
[Show full text]
Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council: Social Determinants of Health Fund and Lobbying for National Change
Case study Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council: social determinants of health fund and lobbying for national change “Delivering improved public health outcomes “Local government expenditure is actually for residents is one of the councils top a mix of taxpayer cost and investment. The priorities. We have made a very good dedicated Public Health Grant is clearly an start this year at ensuring that it is not just investment as it both delivers improved citizen ‘another service’ – but that it is at the heart health outcomes and reduces avoidable of everything we do across policy, service costs to health and social care later on. delivery and decision making in the council. Non-health local government budget spend As we head into our second year we are areas – leisure services, education, children’s exploring what it means to be a public services, regeneration, housing – can all bring health council – not just a council with a ‘added public health value’ if undertaken in public health service. Many of the factors ways which address the Marmot Report’s that affect the health for our residents are areas of evidence-based health improvement determined by national policy – in areas action outside the healthcare system. One such as welfare reform, food policy, tobacco legitimate use of the Public Health Grant control and alcohol pricing. We therefore see is to find ways to lever governance and national advocacy for health promoting policy accountability for health outcomes from these (supporting the most vulnerable) as a growing non-health cost centres.” part of our local public health role”. Dominic Harrison, Councillor Mohammed Khan OBE, Director of Public Health Deputy Leader and Executive Member for Public Health and Adult Social Care New ways of working in Blackburn with Key messages Darwen’s public health operating model • Public health initiatives should be regarded include: as an investment in the social and economic wellbeing of the local area.
[Show full text]
Safer Sleeping Guidance for Children Blackburn with Darwen, Blackpool & Lancashire
SAFER SLEEPING GUIDANCE FOR CHILDREN BLACKBURN WITH DARWEN, BLACKPOOL & LANCASHIRE This documents supersedes previous version created January 2020 or earlier --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Document Updated: January 2020 Document ratified by CDOP: April 2020 Document to be reviewed: April 2021 (unless significant research/ updated national guidelines are released in the interim) Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Aims ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 Scope ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 4.0 Definitions .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 5.0 Roles & Responsibilities ............................................................................................................................................. 4 5.1 Midwifery
[Show full text]
COVID-19 Update: 18Th June 2021
COVID-19 update: 18th June 2021 This update is split into the following sections: (1) Local COVID news (2) Local data on COVID cases (page 7) (3) National COVID news (page 9) (4) National data on COVID cases (page 13) (1) LOCAL COVID NEWS (A) A message from the Director of Public Health for our City Numbers of Covid cases in Brighton & Hove have been edging up for the past month or so. This week they leapt up by 160%. We knew there was a risk this might happen - now that the city’s opening up again and the Delta variant is among us. But I really didn’t want to have to report such a big increase in such a short time. Over half of those new cases were found in teenagers and young adults under the age of 25. This group hasn’t had the chance to get vaccinated yet, but that’s not the full story behind this jump. We know that a lot of transmission is occurring when people are socialising in close contact, often indoors, and then took the virus home with them. Fortunately, many of the cases were discovered by symptom-free LFD tests in time to do something about it. That just shows how effective routine, symptom-free testing is at finding and stopping the virus. Early detection means the people with Covid and their contacts have been able to self- isolate to slow down the virus. I want to thank everyone who has self-isolated and helped to keep Brighton & Hove safe.
[Show full text]
Blackburn with Darwen, Blackpool and Lancashire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (Local Strategy)
Blackburn with Darwen, Blackpool and Lancashire Appendix 5(c) Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (Local Strategy) For more information about the Lancashire and Blackpool Flood Risk Management Strategy please contact:- Flood Risk Management Teams Lancashire County Council Cuerden Offices Highways Department Cuerden Way Preston PR5 6BS Blackpool Council Bickerstaffe Hose Blackpool FY1 1AD [email protected] Blackburn with Darwen, Blackpool and Lancashire Appendix 5(c) Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (Local Strategy) CONTENTS Executive Summary to be completed at the end Introduction Flood and Water Management Act Objectives & Measures Past & Future A Joint Local Strategy Other Sources of Flooding Our Vision for Local Flood Risk Management 1. Theme One - Roles and Responsibilities for Managing Flood Risk 2. Theme Two – Understanding Risk – Local Flood Risk within Lancashire 3. Theme Three – Sustainable Flood Risk Management Spatial Planning and Sustainable Drainage 4. Theme Four – Communication and Involvement 5. Theme Five – Funding 6. Theme 6 – Achieving a Nation of Climate Champions Summary Moving Forward – Implementing and Reviewing our Strategy Appendix 1 Glossary Business Plan Blackburn with Darwen, Blackpool and Lancashire Appendix 5(c) Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (Local Strategy) Lancashire Strategic Partnership Exec Summary to be completed and signed by Members of all 3 authorities Blackburn with Darwen, Blackpool and Lancashire Appendix 5(c) Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (Local Strategy) Figure 1 - Typical Flooding from local sources By courtesy of Cumbria County Council Blackburn with Darwen, Blackpool and Lancashire Appendix 5(c) Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (Local Strategy) Introduction Flood & Water Management Act The Flood and Water Management Act 2010 (FWMA) has put many of the recommendations made by the Pitt Review into legislation and as a result County Councils and Unitary Authorities have been designated as Lead Local Flood Authorities (LLFAs).
[Show full text]
Corporate Peer Challenge City of York Council 2013
Kersten England Chief Executive City of York Council West Offices Station Rise York YO1 6GA 18th July 2013 Dear Kersten City of York Council Corporate Peer Challenge 11th – 14th June 2013 On behalf of the peer team, I would like to say what a pleasure and privilege it was to be invited into City of York Council to deliver the recent corporate peer challenge as part of the LGA offer to support sector led improvement. Peer challenges are delivered by experienced elected member and officer peers. The make-up of the peer team reflected your requirements and the focus of the peer challenge. Peers were selected on the basis of their relevant experience and expertise and agreed with you. The peers who delivered the peer challenge at York were: Dave Smith – Chief Executive, Sunderland City Council Councillor Jon Collins (Labour) – Leader of Nottingham City Council Councillor Clare Whelan OBE (Conservative) – London Borough of Lambeth Tom Stannard – Director of Communications and Public Affairs, NIACE Fiona Johnstone – Director of Public Health, Policy and Performance, Wirral Council Giles Perritt – Head of Policy, Performance and Partnerships, Plymouth City Council Judith Hurcombe – Senior Advisor, LGA (Peer Challenge Manager) Scope and focus of the peer challenge You asked the peer team to provide an external ‘health-check’ of the organisation by considering the core components looked at by all corporate peer challenges: 1. Understanding of the local context and priority setting: Does the council understand its local context and has it established a clear set of priorities? Local Government House, Smith Square, London SW1P 3HZ T 020 7664 3000 F 020 7664 3030 E [email protected] www.local.gov.uk Local Government Improvement and Development is the business name of the Improvement and Development Agency Registered in England No.
[Show full text]
Derby/Nottingham Future Mobility Zones Final
1 Future Mobility Zones Fund Application Form – Final Proposal This application is for the creation of a single Future Mobility Zone (FMZ). One application form must be completed for the proposed zone, regardless of how many individual projects it contains. Please include all relevant information within your completed application form. Applicant Information City region name: Derby – Nottingham Bid manager name and position: Rasita Chudasama, Principal Transport Planner, Nottingham City Council Contact telephone number: 0115 876 3938 Email address: [email protected] Postal address: Nottingham City Council 4th Floor Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG Bid published at: www.transportnottingham.com SECTION A – Name, location and description of the FMZ A1. FMZ name and location (if this differs from your outline proposal, please provide a map of the area in an annex): Derby-Nottingham Future Mobility Zone (FMZ) Scheme Our FMZ scheme will cover the areas of Nottingham City and Derby City, as well as the surrounding built-up areas. It will extend an open access Mobility as a Service (MaaS) offering and a complementary data platform across the combined Travel To Work Area. The extent of this coverage will also provide an improved connection between the cities by enhancing the consistency of the transport offer, and linking a network of flagship electric mobility hubs at key locations across the Derby and Nottingham area. A map of the intervention area, setting out the locations of the scheme and projects, is included in Figure 1 below. 2 Figure 1. Derby-Nottingham future mobility scheme map area A2. FMZ description Our scheme builds on our Transforming Cities Fund schemes, knitting them together to pilot innovative approaches to enhancing mobility.
[Show full text]
CWAG Annual SIG Report to LGA 2021
LGA Board LGA Special Interest Group Annual Report to LGA Board SIG Name: Councils with ALMOs Group Lead Member: Manchester City Council / Nottingham City Council (Change in lead authority due July 2021) Lead Officer: Ceri Davies – Nottingham City Council – CWAG Chair Email: [email protected] Address: Development & Growth | Nottingham City Council Loxley House | Station Street | Nottingham | NG2 3NG Telephone: 0115 876 3530 Website: https://www.councilswithalmos.co.uk/ Membership In the past 12 months, membership of the group has reduced by two councils (in March 2021 Gateshead MBC and Kirklees MBC brought management of council housing back ‘in house’). Manchester City Council is also planning to bring management back ‘in house’ in July this year. Blackpool Borough Council Newcastle City Council Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole Council North East Derbyshire DC Cheltenham Borough Council Nottingham City Council Colchester Borough Council Sedgemoor District Council Cornwall County Council Shropshire County Council Derby City Council Solihull MBC Doncaster MBC Southend on Sea BC Gateshead MBC South Tyneside MBC Haringey LB Stockport MBC Lewisham LB Sutton LB Manchester City Council Tower Hamlets LB Northampton DC Wolverhampton City Council Note – LB Barnet is a CWAG Associate Council, as such is not a full member of the Group or part of the SIG. Aim [brief overview of SIG’s main aim] As a Special Interest Group, CWAG is keen to work with the LGA to inform and influence policy activity on housing, so it reflects the needs and concerns of Councils with ALMOs. LGA Board The Group aims to provide an effective link between member authorities, government departments and others with a national policy and operational remit affecting councils with ALMOs.
[Show full text]
Local Government Reorganisation in Nottinghamshire?: Report of Public
Opinion Research Services | Dorset CCG – Improving Dorset’s Healthcare Consultation 2016/17: Report of Findings May 2017 Loc al Government Reorganisation in Nottinghamshire? Final Report Report of Public and Stakeholder Engagement Opinion Research Services December 2018 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services | Nottinghamshire Reorganisation Report – December 2018 Local Government Reorganisation in Nottinghamshire? Report of Public and Stakeholder Engagement December 2018 Opinion Research Services (ORS) The Strand Swansea SA1 1AF 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] As with all our studies, findings from this report are subject to Opinion Research Services’ Standard Terms and Conditions of Contract. Any press release or publication of the findings of this report requires the advance approval of ORS. Such approval will only be refused on the grounds of inaccuracy or misrepresentation This study was conducted in accordance with ISO 20252:2012 and ISO 9001:2008. © Copyright December 2018 2 Opinion Research Services | Nottinghamshire Reorganisation Report – December 2018 Table of Contents The ORS Project Team .................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction and Summary ........................................................................ 6 Background ........................................................................................................................... 6 The
[Show full text]