DOCSLIB.ORG

Project: Muktagacha Municipal Facilities Subproject Initial Envir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project: Muktagacha Municipal Facilities Subproject Initial Envir Initial Environmental Examination Project No. 39295-038 December 2019 Third Urban Governance and Infrastructure Improvement (Sector) Project Muktagacha Municipal Facilities Sub-project Package Numbers: UGIIP-III-3/AF/MUKT/MF/01/2019 This Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. UGIIP-III-3/AF/MUKT/MF/01/2019 Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 39295-038 December 2019 BAN: Third Urban Governance and Infrastructure Improvement (Sector) Project– Muktagacha Municipal Facilities Sub-project Package Numbers: UGIIP-III-3/AF/MUKT/MF/01/2019 Prepared for the Local Government Engineering Department (LGED), Government of Bangladesh and for the Asian Development Bank IEE Muktagacha (Municipal Facilities) December 2019 i UGIIP-III-3/AF/MUKT/MF/01/2019 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of August 2019) Currency Unit=BDT BDT1.00=$0.01184 $1.00=BDT84.45 ABRREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AP - Affected Person DoE - Department of Environment DPHE - Department of Public Health Engineering EARF - Environmental Assessment and Review Framework ECA - Environmental Conservation Act ECC - Environmental Clearance Certificate ECR - Environmental Conservation Rules EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan GRC - Grievance Redressal Cell GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism IEE - Initial Environmental Examination LCC - Location Clearance Certificate LGED - Local Government Engineering Department MLGRDC - Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development, and Cooperatives O&M - Operations and Maintenance OFID - OPEC Fund for International Development PMU - Project Management Unit PPTA - Project Preparatory Technical Assistance REA - Rapid Environmental Assessment RP - Resettlement Plan SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement ToR - Terms of Reference GLOSSARY OF BANGLADESHI TERMS Crore - 10 million (= 100 lakh) Ghat - boat landing station Hartal - nationwide strike/demonstration called by opposition parties Khal - drainage ditch/canal khas, khash - belongs to government (e.g. land) katcha - poor quality, poorly built lakh, lac - 100,000 madrasha - Islamic college mouza - government-recognized land area parashad - authority (Pourashava) Pourashava - municipality pucca - good quality, well built, solid thana - police station upazila - sub district IEE Muktagacha (Municipal Facilities) December 2019 ii UGIIP-III-3/AF/MUKT/MF/01/2019 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Ha - hectare Km - kilometre M - meter Mm - millimetre NOTES (i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. (ii) ―BDT refers to Bangladeshi Taka This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. PREFACE The premises of this Initial Environmental Examination Report (IEE) are the MDS Consultant services presentation of an analysis of data and conclusions, together with its appendices. While MDS Consultants have been deputed to assist the Pourashava / Executing Agency (EA) for the preparation of the IEE, the responsibility and ownership of the IEE rest with the EA. The key elements of the IEE Report focus on: Assessment of Compliance Guidelines of Environment Safeguards according to ADB and GoB policy. DISCLAIMER This Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Report of Muktagacha Pourashava under Third Urban Governance and Infrastructure Improvement (Sector) Project (UGIIP-III) has been prepared under the guidance of Team Leader of MDS consultant. All the data used to prepare this Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Report have been collected from the Pourashava Development Plan (PDP). Some of the information’s have also been collected from the Pourashava personnel over telephone. Moreover, some information’s have been collected by the respective experts of MDS consultant through intensive field visit which have been used in writing this report. If any information or data or any other things coincide with other project documents that are beyond our knowledge and fully coincidental event and we express apology for that. IEE Muktagacha (Municipal Facilities) December 2019 iii UGIIP-III-3/AF/MUKT/MF/01/2019 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. viii I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Sub-project Scope ................................................................................................................................. 2 C. Purpose of the Report ........................................................................................................................... 3 D. Categorization ....................................................................................................................................... 3 E. Scope of This Report ............................................................................................................................. 4 F. Approach and Methodology ................................................................................................................. 4 a. Data Sources of IEE ...................................................................................................................... 5 b. Scoping and gathering baseline data ........................................................................................... 5 G. Structure of This Report ........................................................................................................................ 5 II. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ........................................................................ 6 A. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 B. Environmental Legislation Framework ................................................................................................. 6 a. Overview of the Project Approval Process .................................................................................. 6 b. Environmental Approval Framework ........................................................................................... 6 C. National Relevant Policies and Strategies ............................................................................................. 7 a. National Environmental Policy ..................................................................................................... 7 b. Environmental Conservation Act (ECA), 1995.............................................................................. 8 c. Environment Conservation Rules, 1997 (Amended in 2002) ....................................................... 9 d. National Water Policy, 1999 ......................................................................................................10 e. Other National Legal Instruments ..............................................................................................10 D. Applicable International Agreements ................................................................................................. 12 E. Environmental Categorization and Standards .................................................................................... 14 a. Environmental Category: Bangladesh ........................................................................................14 b. Environmental Category: ADB ...................................................................................................14 F. Institutional Arrangements / Framework ........................................................................................... 15 a. LGED and Muktagacha Pourashava ...........................................................................................16 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUB-PROJECT ................................................................................................17 A. The Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 17 B. The Sub-Project ................................................................................................................................... 17 a. Super Market Component .........................................................................................................19 C. Implementation Schedule ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Perspectives on Water and Sanitation Towards 'Disaster
    Report on “Community Perspectives on Water and SanitationWatSan towards ‘Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)” Report on Community Perspectives on Water and Sanitation towards ‘Disaster Risk Reduction’ (DRR) For August 2008 Study Conducted by 7/3, Block -A Lalmatia, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh Phone: +88-02- 9146063, Fax: +88-02-9119459 E-mail:[email protected], [email protected] Web site: www.eminence-bd.org Eminence Page 1 of 56 Report on “Community Perspectives on Water and SanitationWatSan towards ‘Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)” Study Team Principal Investigator Dr. Md. Shamim H. Talukder Public Health Specialist Chief Executive Eminence Technical Advisors ARMM Kamal Water and Sanitation Specialist Consultant Eminence Haroon Ur Rashid Water, Sanitation and Environmental Specialist Consultant Eminence Dr. Kuntal K Saha Health and Nutrition Specialist Consultant Eminence Research Coordinator S.M Shajedul Haque Palash Shusmita H Khan Team Members Khan Hasibul Hasan Golam Rabbani Jewel Sabia Kamal Dina Farhana Shaima Akter Serajul Islam Eminence Page 2 of 56 Report on “Community Perspectives on Water and SanitationWatSan towards ‘Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)” Preface In Bangladesh, one-third of the total 140 million populations live below the national poverty line. Furthermore, the intensity of poverty gets worse by high levels of vulnerability due to increasing frequency and magnitude of natural disasters in the coastal areas adjacent to the Bay of Bengal. The common disasters in Bangladesh include floods, cyclones, tornadoes, river erosion, landslides, droughts and earthquakes as well as the affects of these disasters. The situation is further exaggerated by a continuous rise of population and lack of functional community- based disaster management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Animal Productivity by Supplementary Feeding of Multinutrient Blocks, Controlling Internal Parasites and Enhancing Utilization of Alternate Feed Resources
    IAEA-TECDOC-1495 Improving Animal Productivity by Supplementary Feeding of Multinutrient Blocks, Controlling Internal Parasites and Enhancing Utilization of Alternate Feed Resources A publication prepared under the framework of an RCA project with technical support of the Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture December 2006 IAEA-TECDOC-1495 Improving Animal Productivity by Supplementary Feeding of Multinutrient Blocks, Controlling Internal Parasites and Enhancing Utilization of Alternate Feed Resources A publication prepared under the framework of an RCA project with technical support of the Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture December 2006 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Animal Production and Health Section Joint FAO/IAEA Division International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria IMPROVING ANIMAL PRODUCTIVITY BY SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDING OF MULTI-NUTRIENT BLOCKS, CONTROLLING INTERNAL PARASITES, AND ENHANCING UTILIZATION OF ALTERNATE FEED RESOURCES IAEA, VIENNA, 2006 IAEA-TECDOC-1495 ISBN 92–0–104506–9 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2006 Printed by the IAEA in Austria December 2006 FOREWORD A major constraint to livestock production in developing countries is the scarcity and fluctuating quantity and quality of the year-round feed supply. Providing adequate good quality feed to livestock to raise and maintain their productivity is, and will continue to be, a major challenge to agricultural scientists and policy makers all over the world. The increase in population and rapid growth in world economies will lead to an enormous increase in demand for animal products, a large part of which will be from developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • SAU201501 21-09-03496 11.Pdf
    A COMPARISON BETWEEN CONTRACT AND NON CONTRACT POTATO FARMERS DEBASHISH KAR DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM SHER-E-BANGLA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY DHAKA-1207 JUNE, 2015 A COMPARISON BETWEEN CONTRACT AND NON CONTRACT POTATO FARMERS DEBASHISH KAR DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM SHER-E-BANGLA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY DHAKA-1207 JUNE, 2015 A COMPARISON BETWEEN CONTRACT AND NON CONTRACT POTATO FARMERS BY DEBASHISH KAR REGISTRATION NO.: 09-03496 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE (MS) IN AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SEMESTER: JAN-JUNE, 2015 Approved By: Kh. Zulfikar Hossain Prof. Dr. Md. Rafiquel Islam Supervisor Co- Supervisor & Dept. of Agricultural Extension and Assistant Professor Information System Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University Dept. of Agricultural Extension and Information System Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University Dr. M. M. Shofi Ullah Associate Professor & Chairman Examination Committee Dept. of Agricultural Extension and Information System Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University Dedicated to my Beloved parents and Gurudev DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka-1207 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled, A COMPARISON BETWEEN CONTRACT AND NON CONTRACT POTATO FARMERS submitted to the Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION, embodies the result of a piece of bonafide research work carried out by DEBASHISH KAR, Registration No.: 09-03496 under my supervision and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality of Milk Available at Local Markets of Muktagacha Upazila in Mymensingh District
    J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 11(1): 119–124, 2013 ISSN 1810-3030 Quality of milk available at local markets of Muktagacha upazila in Mymensingh district M. A. Islam*, M. H. Rashid, M. F. I. Kajal, and M. S. Alam Department of Dairy Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh *E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The present experiment was conducted to detect quality and level of the adulteration in milk collected from Dharchuni, Atani and Khamar bazar of Muktagacha Upazilla. Organoleptic parameters used to monitor the status of milk samples were color, flavor, taste, texture; physical parameter used was specific gravity; chemical parameters used were acidity, fat content, protein content, lactose content, ash, total solids, solids-not-fat; and the adulteration test used were starch test and formalin test. The tested milk samples showed significantly differences (p<0.05) for specific gravity, protein, fat, lactose and TS contents. No significant difference (p>0.05) were found for %acidity, ash content, and SNF content of milk samples. Milk collected from Khamar Bazar was higher for protein and fat contents than other markets. Adulteration tests, for all the samples were found negative. Although, there were some fluctuations among the parameters of milk samples regarding standard values; all of the milk samples were found to be acceptable. Keywords: Milk quality, Market, Adulteration Introduction Milk is defined as the whole, fresh, clean, lacteal secretion obtained by complete milking of one or more healthy animals excluding that obtained within fifteen days before or five days after calving or such periods as may be necessary to render milk practically colostrums free and containing the minimum prescribed percentage of milk fat (3.5%) and solids not fat (8.5%) (Goff and Hill, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Upazila Election Monitoring Report-2014
    Democracywatch Report on 4th Upazila Election Observation-2014 Democracywatch 15 Eskaton Garden Road Ramna, Dhaka – 1000. Tel: +8802 9344225-6, +8802 8315 807 Fax: 8802 9330405 E-mail: info@ dwatch-bd.org , Web: www.dwatch-bd.org Editorial Team: • Taleya Rehman, Executive Director • Feroze Nurun-Nabi Jugal, Program Coordinator • Rakibul Islam, Program Officer • Maria Akter, Program Assistant 15 June 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS: Chapter Page Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 Foreword 5 Introduction 6 Brief History of Upazila Election 6 Role of Election Commission Bangladesh 7 Law and Ordinance on Election 7 Objectives of Democracywatch Election Monitoring 8 Democracywatch Election Observation Plan 8 Observers Training 9 Election Day Observation 10 Counting Process 11 Print Media Report 12 Brief Description of Violence 12 Conclusion 14 Annexure 17 Annex-1 Summery of Democracywatch’s working area Annex-2 Summery of Observers Training Annex-3 Fact Sheet of 4 th Upazila Election 2014 3 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVATIONS: CBO- Community Based Organization CSO- Civil Society Organization DPPF- District Public Policy Forum DW- Democracywatch ECB - Election Commission Bangladesh EWG- Election Working Group LG - Local Government MDG- Millennium Development Goal MP- Member of Parliament NGO- Non Government Organization PNGO- Partner NGO PS- Polling Station RPO - Representation of the People Order STO - Short Term Observer TAF - The Asia Foundation UNO-Upazila Nirbahi Officer UP- Union Parishad UZP - Upazila Parishad 4 Foreword Democracywatch played an important role in the 4thUpazila Elections in Bangladesh which was held in 6 phases between 19 February and 19 May 2014. Although most of Democracywatch’s work concentrated on the Election Day itself, there were several activities to increase voter awareness toon the electoral process carried out with considerable success.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Public Disclosure Authorized SECOND RURAL TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (RTIP-II) PHASE III UZR SUBPROJECTS WITHOUT ACQUISITION OF PRIVATE LANDS Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN (SIMP) Public Disclosure Authorized NOVEMBER 2015 Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP) Phase III UZR Suprojects in Regions 1 and 2 Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP) Third Year UZR Subprojects without Acquisition of Private Land Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................................... iv List of Annexes .................................................................................................................................................................. v Definition of Selected Terms ............................................................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgement
    I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank my parents first for bringing me in this lovely earth and support me doing whatever I enjoy to do. Then I would like to thank my honorable teacher Naznin Nahar Sultana, Assistant Professor of the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, for supervising our fieldwork so sincerely and friendly. I would like to thank cordially my teacher Shahidul Islam, Assistant Professor of Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, who helped us undertaking the field work not only as a teacher, but also as a friend. We are also thankful to the other guests for going to the study area along with us. I would like to thank the detective branch of police at Sherpur for taking good care of us and helping us during trouble. The rail officers are also thanked to provide us suitable compartments for this very long journey from Chittagong to Mymensingh. I also thank the hotel manager at Sherpur, the AGM and other industrial officials of Sherpur for helping us providing a number of relevant information. The chairman of the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, is also thanked to permit us going to study area and perform our research. As well as, I am thankful to all of my fellows. I also would like to thank the stuffs of my department for helping us by taking care of the research tools and instruments II ABSTRACT The study is about everyday geographies and vulnerabilities of the ethnic community with a case study on Garo people, Sherpur.
    [Show full text]
  • Rajshahi University Journal of Environmental Science
    Volume 2 December Volume 2012 RAJSHAHI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ISSN 2227-1015 Institute of Environmental Science (IES) University of Rajshahi Rajshahi‐6205 BANGLADESH Rajshahi University Journal of Environmental Science ISSN 2227-1015 Volume No. 2, December, 2012 IES Publication No. 2 Published by Institute of Environmental Science University of Rajshahi Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh www.ru.ac.bd/ies @ All rights reserved by the publisher. The Journal is published yearly accommodating all aspects of environmental science both experimental and theoretical within the available scope after peer review. Subscriptions Institutions: Inside Bangladesh Tk. 500 per copy Out side Bangladesh US$ 50 per copy Individual: Inside Bangladesh Tk. 300 per copy Out side Bangladesh US$ 30 per copy Correspondence: All correspondence should be addressed to the Editor, Rajshahi University journal of environmental science, Institute of Environmental Science, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh Website: www. ru.ac.bd/ies, e-mail: [email protected], Tel. 880-0721 750930 Cover Design Dr. Md. Redwanur Rahman Printed at: Rajshahi University Press ISSN 2227-1015 RAJSHAHI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE A Yearly Journal of the Institute of Environmental Science Vol. 2 No. 2 December, 2012 EDITORIAL BOARD Chief Editor Professor Dr. Md. Sarwar Jahan Members Professor Dr. Raquib Ahmed Professor Dr. Zahidul Hassan Professor Dr. Md. Golam Mostafa Dr. Md. Abul Kalam Azad Dr. Md. Redwanur Rahman Associated with us : Zakia Yasmin
    [Show full text]
  • Preference of Information Sources by the Fish Farming Communities of Muktagacha Upazila in Bangladesh
    Vol.8(9), pp. 166-170, September 2016 DOI: 10.5897/JAERD2016.0796 Articles Number: 1392E1F60003 Journal of Agricultural Extension and ISSN 2141-2170 Copyright ©2016 Rural Development Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/JAERD Full Length Research Paper Preference of information sources by the fish farming communities of Muktagacha Upazila in Bangladesh Md. Abdul Momen Miah, Md. Asaduzzaman Sarker, Debashish Sarker Dev* and Kamrun Nahar Kabita Department of Agricultural Extension Education, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Received 7 June, 2016; Accepted 1 August, 2016 The main purpose of the study was to investigate the preference of information sources by the fish farmers with the reasons for such preference. Data were collected from seventy (70) randomly selected fish farmers (out of 350) from two villages of Kumargata union of Muktagacha upazila under Mymensingh district. A pre-tested and structured interview schedule was used to collect data during the period of 5 to 21 March, 2015. Farmer’s preference on information sources were ascertained through a 4-point rating scale. The majority of the respondents (90%) fell in low to moderate preference category of information sources. Among the fifteen (15) selected information sources; neighbor, television, experienced farmers, radio, input dealer, newspaper, local extension agent and farm laborer were major sources preferred by the majority of the farmers for getting information. While farm publications followed by NGO worker and Upazila Fisheries Officer were least preferred by the farmers as information sources. The main reasons for such preferences; competency of information sources, adequacy, timeliness, personal judgment, material incentive from the source and most importantly credibility of the source (safety, dynamisms, qualification etc.) were rated by the farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Road Gazette 8 July 2019 [02-05
    †iwR÷vW© bs wW G-1 evsjv‡`k †M‡RU AwZwi³ msL¨v KZ…©cÿ KZ…©K cÖKvwkZ †mvgevi, RyjvB 8, 2019 MYcÖRvZš¿x evsjv‡`k miKvi cwiKíbv Kwgkb †fŠZ AeKvVv‡gv wefvM moK cwienb DBs cÖÁvcb ZvwiL : 12 Ryb 2019 wLªt bs 20.03.0000.702.014.23.19(Ask-1)-80GbBwm-GK‡bK I mgš^q Abywefv‡Mi 12 †g, 2003 Ges 14 †g, 2003 mv‡ji cÖÁvcb Abyhvqx miKvi KZ©„K ewY©Z mo‡Ki msÁv I †kÖwYweb¨v‡mi Av‡jv‡K moK cwienY I gnvmoK wefv‡Mi AvIZvaxb moK I Rbc_ Awa`ßi (mIR) Ges ¯’vbxq miKvi wefv‡Mi AvIZvaxb ¯’vbxq miKvi cÖ‡KŠkj Awa`ßi (GjwRBwW) I ¯’vbxq miKvi cÖwZôvb (GjwRAvB) KZ©„K `vexK…Z mswkøó moKmg~‡ni gvwjKvbv I `vq-`vwqZ¡ wba©viYKiZt we`¨gvb we‡iva ev gZcv_©‡K¨i (hw` _v‡K) wb®úwË, mo‡Ki †kÖwY/gvb Dbœq‡bi cÖÍve we‡ePbv, GK ms¯’vi `vwqZ¡vaxb mo‡Ki Ab¨ ms¯’vi n¯Í‡ÿc Ges/ev mswkøó Ab¨vb¨ weL‡q AvbxZ Awf‡hvM we‡ePbv K‡i mycvwik cÖYq‡bi Rb¨ cwiKíbv Kwgk‡bi †fŠZ AeKvVv‡gv wefv‡Mi m`m¨‡`i †bZ…‡Z¡ GKwU ÷¨vwÛs KwgwU MVb Kiv nq| moK cwienY I gnvmoK wefvM, ¯’vbxq miKvi wefvM Ges evsjv‡`k †ijI‡q KZ©„K wKQz mo‡Ki gvwjKvbv wbi~cY, gvwjKvbv n¯ÍvšÍi, †kÖwY cwieZ©b, bvg cwieZ©b, †M‡R‡U cÖKvk BZ¨vw` weL‡q Aby‡iv‡ai †cÖwÿ‡Z cÖÍvweZ moKmg~‡ni Dci MZ 02 †g 2019 Zvwi‡L †fŠZ AeKvVv‡gv wefv‡Mi m`m¨ Gi mfvcwZ‡Z¡ mo‡Ki †kÖwYweb¨vm, gvwjKvbv, `vq-`vwqZ¡ wba©viY I moK msµvšÍ gZcv_©K¨ wb®úwËi j‡ÿ¨ MwVZ ÷¨vwÛs KwgwUi mfv AbywôZ nq| D³ mfvi mycvwik I h_vh_ KZ©„c‡ÿi Aby‡gv`bµ‡g wb‡gœv³ moKmg~‡ni gvwjKvbv wbi~cY, gvwjKvbv nšÍvšÍi, †kÖwY cwieZ©b, bvg cwieZ©b I †M‡R‡U cÖKvk BZ¨vw` Rb¯^v‡_© cybtwba©viY Kiv n‡jv : ( 19487 ) g~j¨ : UvKv 40.00 19488 2.1 GjwRBwW I GjwRAvB Gi AvIZvq †M‡RUfzw³i Rb¨ cÖ¯ÍvweZ moKmg~n (412wU moK) : †Rjvi bvg : XvKv BDwbqb moK Name of SL Road ID Road Road Name Road Length Proposed Upazila No.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of LGED Road Network, March 2005, Bangladesh
    BASIC INFORMATION OF ROAD DIVISION : DHAKA DISTRICT : MYMENSINGH ROAD ROAD NAME CREST TOTAL SURFACE TYPE-WISE BREAKE-UP (Km) STRUCTURE EXISTING GAP CODE WIDTH LENGTH (m) (Km) EARTHEN FLEXIBLE BRICK RIGID NUMBER SPAN NUMBER SPAN PAVEMENT PAVEMENT PAVEMEN (m) (m) (BC) (WBM/HBB/ T BFS) (CC/RCC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UPAZILA : MUKTAGACHA ROAD TYPE : UPAZILA ROAD 361652001 Dapunia bazar - Muktagacha road Via Kharuajani 5.80 8.450.00 6.35 2.10 0.00 41 52.60 11 10.30 (Muktagacha portion) (From RHD#48) 361652002 Muktagacha - Khamarar Bazar Road 7.31 11.260.00 11.26 0.00 0.00 24 33.80 0 0.00 361652004 Muktagacha - Biddyagong GC Road 4.90 6.222.47 3.75 0.00 0.00 8 34.30 0 0.00 361652005 Muktagacha - Begunbari GC Road 6.16 5.852.05 3.80 0.00 0.00 7 47.03 0 0.00 361652006 Sattrashia R&H - Baigunbari G.C Road 3.75 3.513.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 42.72 0 0.00 361652007 Rasulpur R&H - Hatkalir Bazar GC via Chandaniata 4.88 8.603.69 2.70 2.21 0.00 29 36.82 3 3.00 Road (Muktagacha portion) 361652008 Chechua GC - Hatkalir Bazar GC via Kalir bazar & 4.88 14.585.73 8.85 0.00 0.00 27 28.80 0 0.00 Shibgonj Bazar Road.(Muktagacha portion) 361652009 Montola R&H - Dapunia (GC) Via Khukshia Road.3.65 5.555.04 0.52 0.00 0.00 1 4.00 0 0.00 361652010 Chechua - Khamarer Bazar Road Via Mogaltola & 3.05 10.509.81 0.69 0.00 0.00 12 27.24 5 17.00 Syedpara Bazar Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Corresponding Author: [email protected] 46
    Breeding and production performance profile of Black Bengal goats in rural areas of Mymensingh in Bangladesh Islam AFMF, S Nahar, Tanni TSJ, Hoque MA, Bhuiyan AKFH* Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh Abstract The present study was conducted to know the breeding and performance profile of Black Bengal goat in 4 upazila (Mymensingh Sadar, Fulbaria, Trishal and Muktagacha) of Mymensingh district. The data were collected using a pre-tested questionnaire from 100 goat rearers. The questionnaire included primary information about goat owners, total number of goats, color pattern, birth information, fate of male kids, weight of kids, breeding system and source of breeding males, breeding cost, litter size, kid mortality, some management parameters on goat and goat rearing system under rural condition. On an average, goat per family at Mymensingh district was found to be 3.56 ±1.77 where the percentage of does and bucks were 90.61% and 9.39% respectively. Most of the farmers were found not to keep male kid for bad odor and difficult management and hence castrate them. Almost all farmers depend on natural mating to serve their does by passing a significant distance. The average service charge was found BDT 70.90±1.77, which differs significantly (P< 0.05) among four upazilas. No significant difference was found in performance of goats among four upazilas. The average body weight at 3 and 6 months of age of female goats were 4.67 ± 0.15 and 7.12±0.14 kg respectively. The average litter size was found 1.76±0.75 and the average kid mortality rate was 12.88% in Mymensingh district.
    [Show full text]