Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 1 Spring 4-24-2017 Martin Luther King Jr.’s Perjury Trial: A Potential Turning Point and a Footnote to History Leonard Rubinowitz
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse Part of the Law Commons Publication Citation Leonard S. Rubinowitz, Martin Luther King Jr.’s Perjury Trial: A Potential Turning Point and a Footnote to History, 5 Ind. J.L. & Soc. Equality 237 (2017). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Perjury Trial: A Potential Turning Point and a Footnote to History Leonard S. Rubinowitz* INTRODUCTION § 382. (5166) (7548) Perjury before state department of revenue Any witness who shall testify falsely as to any material fact about which he is interrogated by the department of revenue, or in any investigation or proceedings held before the department of revenue, shall be guilty of perjury, and shall, on conviction, be imprisoned in the penitentiary for not less than two years nor more than five years.1 In 1960, the state of Alabama indicted Martin Luther King, Jr. for perjury, based on his alleged underpayment of his state income taxes in 1956 and 1958.2 Governor John Patterson ordered the prosecution as a tactic in his campaign of resistance to the Civil Rights Movement.3 While civil rights activists turned to the courts on occasion to advance their goals, legal strategies lay at the core of Governor Patterson’s effort to defeat the movement.