Report of a Diagnostic Workshop Conducted with the Customs Administration of the Republic of Armenia Barents Group

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of a Diagnostic Workshop Conducted with the Customs Administration of the Republic of Armenia Barents Group Report of a Diagnostic Workshop Conducted with the Customs Administration of The Republic of Armenia Barents Group Prepared on April 7, 2000 by: Alan Morley, Team Leader Manuel Henriques Michael Lane TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Methodology 2 1.3 Perspective on Armenian Customs 4 1.4 Importance of Customs 4 SECTION 2: CURRENT STATUS OF THE CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION 2.1 History 6 2.2 Organizational Structure 6 2.3 Geography 6 2.4 Number of Staff by Location and Division 7 2.5 Salary Structure 7 2.6 Other Points Interest 8 SECTION 3: RESULTS FROM INTERVIEWS FROM THE FIRST WEEK'S ENTRY MISSION 10 SECTION 4: ARMENIAN CUSTOMS PROBLEMS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES 4.1 Lack of a Uniform, Simplified, Well-Defined and Well-Documented Import and Export Process for Customs and Business to Follow 14 4.2 Lack of Customs Wide Information Framework and Inadequate Information Technology Support 15 4.3 Lack of Necessary Equipment and facilities to Increase Compliance and Improve Facilitation 15 4.4 Lack of Training and Training Materials for Customs Officials and the Trading Community 15 4.5 Lack of Compliance with Customs Laws Both by Customs Officers and by the Business Community and the Public, Coupled by a Wide Spread Perception by the Public of Corruption in Customs 16 SECTION 5: SOLUTIONS DERIVED FROM THE DIAGNOSTIC WORKSHOP 5.1 Provision of a Uniform, Simplified, Well-Defined and Well-Documented Import and Export Process for Customs and Business to Follow 17 5.2 Provision of Customs Wide Information Framework and adequate Information Technology Support 18 5.3 Provision of Necessary Equipment and facilities to increase Compliance and Improve Facilitation 20 5.4 Provision of Training and Training Materials for Customs Officials and the Trading Community 23 5.5 Promotion of Compliance with Customs Laws Both by Customs Officers and by the Business Community and the Public, to Counteract a Wide Spread Perception by the Public of Corruption in Customs 26 5.6 Broader or Multi-Level Recommendations 31 SECTION 6: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 6.1 Accountability for Action and Assignment of Priorities 35 6.2 Monitoring and Coordination 35 6.3 Measurement Criteria 36 6.4 Use of Existing Resources 36 6.5 Implementation Schedule 36 APPENDICES (following page 43) 1 Names of Workshop Participants 2 Workshop Schedule 3 Current Organizational Structure of the Ministry of State Revenues 4 Map of Armenia Showing Existing Customs Sites 5 List of People Interviewed During the Entry Mission Preparatory to the Workshop 6 Flowcharts of Existing Import and Export Processes, Comments on Potential Areas for Improvement, and Proposed Flowcharts Outlining Improved Processes 7 Proposal to USAID for the Networking Tax and Customs Sites Using Land Lines 8 List Developed by Workshop Participants of Computer Equipment Requirements for Customs Sites 9 Proposal prepared by Customs in 1999 for the Development of Customs Application Software and for the Networking of Customs Sited Using Satellite Communication 10 List Developed by Workshop Participants of Examination and Enforcement Equipment Requirements for Customs Sites 1 1 List of Equipment Requirements Developed in Connection with the Yerevan Risk Assessment Pilot Project 12 Proposal Developed During the Workshop of Training Center Requirements 13 Risk Assessment Project Statistics Acknowledgements The team members would like to extend their appreciation to all those who participated directly or indirectly in the Customs Diagnostic Workshop, Without their dedication and professionalism, the Workshop could not have been as successful as it was. The Workshop facilitators would like to note the tremendous work over the four weeks by Mr. Arthur Dunlop of the British Know How Fund. Without his outstanding dedication and assistance, the Workshop could not have taken place. Similarly, we are indebted to the Head of Customs, Mr. Grigor Melkumyan, for his support, generosity and facilitation of the Workshop. Mr. Melkumyan also graciously provided the facilities at the training center for the Workshop and made key staff members available to the facilitators: Mr. Ara Avetissyan, Mr. Martun Minasyan, Mr. Grigor Avetissyan, Mr. Tigran Sargissian, Mr. David Davtian and Mr. Gevorg Saghoyan, who prepared the flow charts and analyses presented in Section 5.1 of this report. To Mr. Bill Gardner and the team from Barents Group, LLC. in Yerevan, for their ground support, advice and use of their facilities. To all those who gave of their time for our interviews and consultations, without which we could not have developed an extensive two-week Workshop program. The facilitators would also like to personally thank Khosrov Harutunyan, Mariam Movsissyan, Vladimir Hairapetyan and Lucine Mkhitaryan for their tireless interpretation and translation services. Finally, the facilitators would like to thank Mr. Fred Clapps from USAID for his support and guidance throughout this mission. Section 1: Diagnostic Workshop on the Customs Administration of the Republic of Armenia, Conducted from March 20 to March 31, 2000. 1.1 Background On March 20, 2000, a team of international Customs experts on contract with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) convened a two week Diagnostic Workshop on the performance of the Customs Administration of the Republic of Armenia. The team consisted of: - Alan Morley, Team 'Leader and Former Senior Official of Canadian Customs - Manuel Henriques, Senior Official of Canadian Customs - Michael Lane, Former Senior Official of United States Customs An integral member of the Workshop was Mr. Arthur Dunlop, long-term advisor to the Armenian Customs Administration from the British Know How Fund. Mr. Dunlop was an invaluable resource to the team over the four weeks: scheduling and participating in fact-finding interviews in advance of the Workshop, and contributing extensively during the Workshop itself. In many instances Mr. Dunlop was able to put into perspective the specific issues that the Customs Administration of the Republic of Armenia must deal with. The purpose of this Diagnostic Workshop was to: - Determine the expectations of the Government of Armenia from Armenian Customs - Identify issues, problems, and challenges in meeting those expectations - Develop a work plan with Customs buy-in that will identify solutions, costs, and timeframes to improve the performance of Armenian Customs - Ensure that the plan is consistent with all international Customs standards. 1.2 Methodology During the week preceding the Workshop, the team conducted fact finding interviews with numerous officials and organizations both in and out of government who are familiar with Customs and have a stake in the performance of Customs. Included in these meetings and interviews were the following: - Importers - Exporters - Customs Brokers, Freight Forwarders and Carriers - Airport Authority - Other Government Agencies and officials including the Ministries of State Revenues, Finance, Agriculture, Industry and Trade, and Standards Institute - Non Governmental Organizations - United Nations Conference on Trade and Development - Business Organizations - Senior Customs Officials in Headquarters, at Customs Houses and at Entry Points. 2 The team also reviewed Customs operations at Zvartnots airport and the Customs examining warehouse in Yerevan, the land border crossing at Bagratashen and the rail crossing at Ayrum and other Customs operations in Shirak, Gyumri and Vanadzor- The Workshop was opened by Head of Customs Grigor Melkumyan who emphasized the importance of the Workshop to Customs and the nation and encouraged active participation of all attendees. This was followed by comments from Alan Morley, the USAID team leader who explained the purpose of the Workshop, outlined the schedule, and discussed the methodology. Mr. Morley echoed Mr. Melkumyan's comments and emphasized that this was Customs' Workshop and that the team of facilitators were not here to instruct or propose solutions but to support the participants in their efforts to improve the administration of Customs in Armenia. The Workshop was attended by senior officials of Customs from Headquarters, the Customs Houses, and Entry Points throughout the nation. Senior officials from other departments of the Ministry of State Revenues such as Training, Anti Smuggling, Investigations, Information Technology, and Statistics also actively participated. A complete list of Workshop participants is provided in Appendix 1 - The Workshop itself was conducted in two parts (a schedule is attached as Appendix 2). Week one was devoted exclusively to an analysis of the current state of Customs. There were detailed discussions of problems from the perspective of industry, other agencies that Customs works with in the import/export process, and high government officials with an interest in trade and investment in Armenia. There was a frank and open discussion of those problems and issues, as well as other problems identified by the Customs representatives themselves. In order to encourage participation of all Workshop attendees there was extensive use of breakout groups to identify, discuss, categorize, and find the root causes and impact of problems. one problem of major significance emerged from all discussions by participants as well as the pre conference interviews with industry and government stockholders. This was the lack of transparency and uniformity and the absence of a defined and documented import/export process. This was identified
Recommended publications
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Soon After Armenia's Independence In
    WT/TPR/S/228 Trade Policy Review Page 56 VI. TRADE POLICIES BY SECTOR (1) AGRICULTURE 1. Soon after Armenia's independence in September 1991, 864 collective and state farms were privatized and about 321,000 private farms created.1 By 2006 the number of private farms had increased to about 340,000, as more public land was privatized by open tender. Farms are not only small in size (the average is about 1.4 ha), they are also fragmented, with about 1,200,000 parcels of land shared among the 340,000 farms. The size varies considerably from 0.62 ha in the irrigated Ararat Marz to 3.8 ha in the extensive crop and livestock raising Syunik Marz. If agriculture is to develop further, farms and holdings will need to be consolidated in order to achieve economies of scale. A major impediment to consolidation and a functioning land market was poor registration of land parcels and the issuance of titles. During the review period, a project sponsored by the World Bank and supported by other donors has greatly improved this situation, and most land parcels have now been surveyed and registered, and titles have been issued.2 2. Agriculture contributed an average of 18.8% to Armenia's GDP during 2004-08, and made up about 46% of employment (Chapter I(1)). However, in addition to the problems associated with farm structure, the growth and competitiveness of the sector is restricted by various topographic and climatic factors; for example, most of the land is at an altitude of over 1,000 metres; and over two thirds is on slopes of 6º or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Sector Development Strategy (Financed by the ADB Technical Assistance Special Fund)
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 4061002 November 2008 Armenia: Transport Sector Development Strategy (Financed by the ADB Technical Assistance Special Fund) This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. Asian Development Bank TA 4973-ARM Ministry of Transport and Communication Republic of Armenia Armenia Transport Sector Development Strategy 2020 Final Report in association with Yerevan, November 2008 Armenia Transport StrategyGeorgia 2020 Georgia Bagratashen Bavra Gogavan AH 81 M 3 AH 82 Dilijian Gyumri Vanadzor Azerbaijan Gavar AH 82 AH 81 Ashtarak Armenia Sevana Lake YEREVAN AH 81 Artashat Turkey AH 82 Yeghegnadzor Capital Goris Airport Azerbaijan Body of Water Road Kapan AH 82 Railroad Agarak International Corridor City Border Point Iran Boundaries are not necessarily authoritative Kilometers 0 25 50 100 Abbreviations and Acronyms AADT annual average daily traffic HWTSK Harral Winner Thompson Sharp Klein ADB Asian Development Bank IATA International Air Transport Association ADR Agreement Concerning the International ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road IFI international financial institutions AEPLAC Armenian-European Policy and Legal IFRS International Financial Reporting Advice Centre Standards AETR European
    [Show full text]
  • Հավելված N 1 Հհ Կառավարության 2011 Թվականի Մարտի 3-Ի N 220 - Ն Որոշման
    Հավելված N 1 ՀՀ կառավարության 2011 թվականի մարտի 3-ի N 220 - Ն որոշման Կ Ա Ր Գ ՀԱՅԱՍՏԱՆԻ ՀԱՆՐԱՊԵՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԱՇԽԱՐՀԱԳՐԱԿԱՆ ԱՆՎԱՆՈՒՄՆԵՐԻ ՌՈՒՍԵՐԵՆ ԵՎ ԱՆԳԼԵՐԵՆ ՏԱՌԱԴԱՐՁՈՒԹՅԱՆ I. ԸՆԴՀԱՆՈՒՐ ԴՐՈՒՅԹՆԵՐ 1. Սույն կարգով կանոնակարգվում են այն հիմնական դրույթները, որոնք անհրա- ժեշտ են մեկ միասնական համակարգում Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումների անգլերեն և ռուսերեն հրատարակման և օգտագործման ժամանակ։ 2. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվի համար մշակվել է մեկ մասնակի կարգ, որը հիմնականում անհրաժեշտ կլինի Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումներով ռուսերեն և անգլերեն քարտեզներ, ատլասներ, գրական և տեղեկատվական նյութեր հրատարակելիս, ինչպես նաև ճանապարհային, վարչական շենքերի և այլ նպատակների համար նախատեսված ցուցանակներ տեղադրելիս։ 3. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվով անվանման ճիշտ ձևն ամրագրվում է` համադրելով մի քանի սկզբնաղբյուր։ 4. Հայերեն աշխարհագրական անվանումները պետք է տառադարձվեն այլ լեզուներով` հիմք ընդունելով տվյալ լեզվի արտահայտման առանձնահատկությունները, առավելագույնս մոտեցնելով դրանց գրելաձևերը հայերենի արտասանության հնչողությանը։ Առանձին դեպքերում ընդունված ավանդական գրելաձևերը հասցվել են նվազագույնի։ 5. Աշխարհագրական անվանումների տառադարձությունը, որպես կանոն, կատար- վում է հայերենի ժամանակակից գրելաձևից՝ հաստատված «Հայաստանի Հանրապետության վարչատարածքային բաժանման մասինե Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենքով և տերմի- 11_0220 2 նաբանական կոմիտեի 1956 թվականի սեպտեմբերի, 1958 թվականի փետրվարի և 1978 թվականի փետրվարի համապատասխան որոշումներով։ Հայերենի այն հնչյունները, որոնք չունեն ռուսերեն և անգլերեն համարժեքներ, տառադարձվում են հնարավորինս ավելի մոտ
    [Show full text]
  • THE STUDY on LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT in the REPUBLIC of ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V February 2006 KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., L
    JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA THE STUDY ON LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V SECTORAL REPORT – 1 - PRESENT CONDITIONS - February 2006 KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. THE STUDY ON LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V SECTORAL REPORT-1 - PRESENT CONDITIONS - Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1 NATURAL CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Topography ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Geology ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER-2 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM........................................................... 8 2.1 Legal System................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Policy, Budget, and Economy ...................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER-3 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 18 3.1 Purpose and Policy Of Study.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia
    Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. GE JR Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. 12-181 Republic of Armenia Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Final Report Vol. II Main Report 1 Risk Assessment of Yerevan City December 2012 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) OYO International Corp. Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd. The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Structure of Volume of Final Report Vol. Title Language Armenian I Summary English Japanese Armenian Main Report 1 II English Risk Assessment of Yerevan City Japanese Armenian Main Report 2 III English Yerevan Earthquake Disaster Management Plan Japanese Armenian IV Data Book English Exchange rate used in this report 1.00 US Dollar (US$) = 407.43 Armenia Drams (AMD) 1.00 Japanese Yen (JPY) = 5.19 Armenia Drams (AMD) (as of October 8, 2012) Outline of the Project Outline of the Project 1. Background Title: The Project for Seismic Risk Assessment and Risk Management Planning in the Republic of Armenia Counterpart Agency: Rescue Service, Ministry of Emergency Situations (RS) Project Period: August 2010 - December 2012 The goal of this project is “Reduction of Disasters due to a large scale earthquake which has a possibility of occurrence in Yerevan City”.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Document Template
    E ffi n UN Dtr EUROPEANUNION Enwredliw nEifient nations. United Nations DevelopmentProgramme Country:Republic of Armenia Project Document Modernizatian of Bogratashen, Bavro, Gogavan Border ProjectTitle Crossing Points of the Republic of Armenia (MBBG BCPs) Democraticgovernance is strengthened by improving UNDAFOutcome:2 accountability,promoting institutional and capacity developmentand expanding people's participation lmprovedstructures and mechanismsat both centralized ExpectedCP Outcome: 2.1 and decentralized levels ensure the progressive realizationof humanrights. Capacityof governmentinstitutions to manageborders, ExpectedCP Output: 2.1.4 migration, combat trafficking and effectively protect humanrights enhanced lmplementingPartner: State RevenueCommittee (SRC)of the Governmentof the Republicof Armeniawith UNDPsupport Brief Description The overoll objective of this Project is to support the Government of Armenia in implementation of the selected provisionsof the GovernmentDecree #482 (21.04.2011)on the approvalof 2011-2015IBM Action Plan The specific objective of this Project is to support the Government of Armenio in modernisation of Bagratashen, Bavro and Gogavon border crossing points of Armenia for oligning them to the IBM international stondords oimed at the facilitation of the movement of people and goods acrossthe border. ProgrammePeriod: 2012-20L5 Totalresources required: USS 52,838,236 or EUR43.776,000 Totalallocated resources: AtlasAward lD: Governmentof Armenialoan funding from: EIB:30,316,000 EUR Estimatedstart date: 01.09.2012 Governmentof Armeniagrant funding from: 3I.12.20L5 EstimatedEnd date: NIF:12,000,000 EUR ProjectAppraisal Committee Meeting Date: UNDPregular resources: 800,000 EUR 25.07.20L2 *For the purposesof this document, a IJNOperational Exchange Rateof 7 USD= 0.8(MEUR has been ossumed. Agreedby GagikKhachatryan, Chairman of SRC,GoA Agreedby DirkBoberg, UNDP Resident Representative a.i.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    ReportNo. 16625-AM Republicof Armenia TransportSector Review (In Three Volumes) Volume II: Technical Report Public Disclosure Authorized May30, 1997 InfrastructureOperations Division Country Department IV Europeand Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Documentof OmWorld Bank Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY UNITS and EQUIVALENTS Dr Dram - Introduced Nov. 22, 1993 US$1 = 14 Dr (November, 1993) US$1 = 425 Dr (October, 1996) Rbl Ruble US$1 = 2,600 Rbl (October 1993) US$ US Dollar USc US cent WEIGHTS, MEASURES and OTHER UNITS bln billion inh inhabitant kg kilogram km kilometer mln million pass passenger sq km, km square kilometer t ton (metric, 1,000 kg) th thousand toe ton oil equivalent vpd vehicles per day CONVERSION FACTORS 1 mile = 1.609 meters 1 kg = 2.205 lbs i US gallon= 3.785 liters 1 sq km = 0.386 square miles CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS CXHY5HC Hydrocarbons CO Carbon Monoxide CO2 Carbon Dioxide NOX Nitrogen Oxides SO2 Sulfur Dioxide FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 Vice President: Johannes Linn, ECAVP Director: Basil G. Kavaksly, EC4DR Division Chief: Dominique Lallement, EC4IN Task Manager: Pedro N. Taborga, EC41N GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ATC Air Traffic Control ARD Armenian Road Directorate CIF Cost-Insurance-Freight CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CLAU Caucasus Logistics Advisory Unit CMEA Council for Mutual Economic Assistance COTIF Bern Convention of May 9, 1980 EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference EDI Electronic
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 7 YEREVAN PILOT PROJECT 7.1 Social and Economic Situation 7.1.1 Location and Area Yerevan City Is Situated in Northeast
    CHAPTER 7 YEREVAN PILOT PROJECT 7.1 Social and Economic Situation 7.1.1 Location and Area Yerevan City is situated in northeastern of the RA postponed from northeast to the southeast, on the north-eastern part of Ararat valley, on concavity, on two riversides of Hrazdan, 900-1200 meters above sea level. This capital city adjoins Aragatsotn, Kotayk, Ararat, and Aramavia Marz (regional administration) with it’s administration boundaries. Only 20km is in to a Turkish boundary in the southeast. Figure 7.1.1 Location of Yerevan City It is about at the same latitude as Washington, Madrid, Beijing. Territory 227 square km Agricultural land 6413 ha including arable rand 1506 ha 7.1.2. History and Urban Development Yerevan City is the largest city not only among the present-day 48 cities of RA but also among the capitals of historical Armenia. Yerevan is one of the oldest cities in the world and has a history of 2784 years (of the same age as Eternal City of Rome, Kartagen, Nineveh and Damascus). Name of Yerevan comes from Urartian period (It is B.C.9 to 6 century. )and derivers from Erebuni. It is known from Urartology that Urartian sound “B” in Armenian sounds like “V”. Therefore name Erebuni has been changes into Eerevan then Erevan, Yerevan. In the Soviet period modern Yerevan from the provincial city (number of population was less than 30,000 in 1920) turned into a big industrial (nearly half of industrial potential), cultural and scientific center as well as the most important transport junction (the railway connected Black Sea with Persian Gulf and the railroad (Yerevan - Hrazdan- Ijevan- Aghstava) connecting it with Baku- Tbilisi are intersected in Yerevan); Yerevan- Sevan basin-Stock railway is of local importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Stepanavan District Travel Guide 2010
    MYSTERIES AND SACRED SITES OF STEPANAVAN DISTRICT TRAVEL GUIDE 2010 Taguhi Sahakyan Contents Table of Contents 1. Lori Region (p. 4 - 5) 4. Places to visit along the Gargar River (p. 12 - 14) a. Gyulagarak – Dendropark (Botanical Garden), 2. Stepanavan (p. 5 - 7) Tormakadur Church a. Stepan Shahumyan Museum b. Vardablur – St. Jgrashen Church, Vardablur's Fortress, b. St. Nshan Chapel St. Sargis Church c. Chrchran Waterfall c. Kurtan – St. Astvatsatsin Basilica (V c.), Hnevank Monastery Complex (VII c.) d. Kuybishev Lake d. Dsegh (on Debed River) – Hovhannes Tumanyan's e. Lori Berd (Fortress-town) House-Museum, St. Grigor Lusavorich Chapel (XII-XIII f. Shushanik's Fortress c.), Mamkikonyan's Medieval Cemetery, Sirun Khach g. Communist Cave (Mayori Dzor) (Beautiful Cross Stone), Bardzrakash St. Grigor h. Hovhannes Tumanyan's School Monastery (XIII c.), Gikor's Mountain Spring i. St. Sargis Church j. Amrakits (Kirov) Village of Russian Babushkas - 5. Places to visit in the north of Stepanavan (p. 14) Russian church a. Sverdlov – St. Gevorg Church (XI-XII c.) k. Lovers' Trail b. Sverdlov-Privolnoe – Dorbandavank/St. Astvatsatsin l. Tormakadur Church (VI c.) m. Dendropark (Botanical Garden) c. Privolnoe-Jiliza – Khuchap (XIII c.) and Khorakert (XI- n. Pushkin Pass XIII c.) Monasteries 3. Places to visit along the Dzoraget River (p. 9 - 12) 6. Day tours from Stepanavan along the Debed River (p. 15) a. Agarak Village – Darmanatagh, St. Astvatsatsin a. Dsegh (see above) Church (V-VI c.), Fountain Monument (X-XI c.) b. Tumanyan – Kobayr Monastery (XII – XIII c.) b. Lejan – Red Church (XIX c.) built on V c.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Travel Report: Armenia 1 © Asirt 2010
    ROAD TRAVEL REPORT: ARMENIA KNOW BEFORE YOU GO… Driving is not recommended, due to poor road conditions and the high risk driving culture. The road network is inadequate to handle the rapidly growing vehicle fleet. Used vehicles imported from other countries often fail to meet safety standards. Annual road crashes have increased about 12%, partly due to the raised speed limit and increased vehicle ownership. Road fatalities increased 40% and road crash injuries In 2008, Armenia had twice the death rate from road 66% in a five year period. crashes than the death rate from road crashes of the There are 10.5 road fatalities per 10,000 vehicles in combined EU countries. Armenia, compared to 1.6 in the U.S. and 0.9 in the UK. ROAD REALITIES DRIVER BEHAVIORS Taxi drivers parked at street corners, awaiting Many drivers take risks, show little courtesy to other passengers contributes to traffic congestion. drivers, disregard traffic regulations and do not stop for Many cars are in poor condition. Private organizations red lights. Use caution when driving or crossing a road. in Armenia are conducting vehicle inspections. “Road rage” is a serious problem. In some cases, “road rage” has escalated to physical violence against drivers GENERAL ROAD CONDITIONS and/or pedestrians. Yield to aggressive drivers. Armenia is a landlocked country in the southern Driving under the influence of alcohol is more Caucasus Mountains, between the Black and Caspian common on weekends, especially on the main road Seas. The Caucasus Mountains covers 80% of the from Yerevan to the Tsaghkadzor and Sevan resort country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technologies Comprise the Following Services Updated On
    The technologies comprise the following services Updated on February 28, 2020 2G technology comprises the following services: voice, data (GPRS, EDGE), ensuring speed of up to 474 Kbps 3G technology comprises the following services: voice, data (R99, HSPA), ensuring speed of up to 42.2 Mbps 4G+ technology comprises the following services: voice (CSFB), data, ensuring speed of up to 300 Mbps for download and up to 50 Mbps of upload CSFB service gives an opportunity to the subscribers to accept phone calls in 4G+ network. The voice call is performed by transferring from 4G+ technology to 3G; upon the session completion 3G is switched back to 4G+. Starting from 2020 Viva-MTS has been rendering VoLTE service, which ensures higher quality and short set- up period for calls made in 4G+ network coverage. The usage speeds of the mentioned technologies depend on the coverage, the load of the base station as well as on the quality and class of the device in use by the subscriber. Technology definition explanation: Yes – possible to use the service in the mentioned area No - not possible to use the service in the mentioned area Region Technology Populated area name Populated area 2G 3G 4G+ type Aragatsotn Ashtarak town Yes Yes Yes Mughni village Yes Yes Yes Aparan town Yes Yes Yes Talin town Yes Yes Yes Agarak village Yes Yes Yes Agarakavan village Yes Yes No Alagyaz village Yes Yes Yes Akunq village Yes Yes No Aghdzq village Yes Yes No Sadunts village Yes Yes Yes Antarut village Yes Yes Yes Ashnak village Yes Yes Yes Avan village Yes Yes No
    [Show full text]