DOCSLIB.ORG

2103220* Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space PROVISIONAL LIST of PARTICIPANTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2103220* Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space PROVISIONAL LIST of PARTICIPANTS A/AC.105/C.1/2021/CRP.2 11 May 2021 Original: English/French/Spanish Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Scientific and Technical Subcommittee Fifty-eighth session Vienna, 19–30 April 2021 PROVISIONAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Chair: Ms. Natália ARCHINARD (SWITZERLAND) Members ALGERIA Chef de la Délégation S.E. Mme. Faouzia MEBARKI, Ambassadrice, Représentante permanente, Mission permanente auprès des Nations Unies, Vienna Représentants M. Fariz OUTAMAZIRT, Sous-directeur au Service Géographique et Télédétection au Ministère de la Défense Nationale Mme Myriam NAOUN, Attachée des Affaires Etrangères près de l’Ambassade d’Algérie M. Tahar IFTENE, Directeur d'Etudes, chargé de la formation et de la recherche, Agence Spatiale Algérienne ARGENTINA Jefe de la Delegación Sr. Gustavo AINCHIL, Representante Permanente, Misión Permanente ante las Naciones Unidas, Viena Representantes Sr. Fabiana LOGUZZO, Misión Permanente ante las Naciones Unidas, Viena Sra. Sandra TORRUSIO, Comisión Nacional de Actividades Espaciales (CONAE) Sra. Ana MEDICO, Subgerente de Cooperación Institucional, Comisión Nacional de Actividades Espaciales. V.21-03220 (E) *2103220* A/AC.105/C.1/2021/CRP.2 Sr. Marcelo COLAZO, Responsable Área de Estudios Ultraterrestres, Comisión Nacional de Actividades Espaciales. Sra. Ximena PORCASI, Comisión Nacional de Actividades Espaciales. Sra. Patricio URUEÑA PALACIO, Misión Permanente ante las Naciones Unidas, Viena ARMENIA Representatives Mr. Ashot HOVSEPYAN, Chief Specialist, Scientific-Technical Department, Ministry of High-Tech Industry, Republic of Armenia Mr. Ararat SAHAKYAN, Chief Specialist, Market Research Division, Market Development Department, Ministry of High-Tech Industry, Republic of Armenia Ms. Elen HARUTYUNYAN, Counsellor, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Mr. Davit MANUKYAN, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna AUSTRALIA Representatives Mr. Stephen HILLS, First Secretary, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Mr. Nicola LOVE, Multilateral Policy Officer, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Mr. Michael COOK, Assistant Manager, Office of the Space Regulator, Australian Space Agency Ms. Georgia WEINERT, Policy Officer, Office of the Space Regulator, Australian Space Agency Mr. Richard MARSHALL, Space Weather Services Section of the Bureau of Meteorology in Australia Ms. Chandana UNNITHAN, Professor, Torrens University of Australia, Expert Member, Space and Global Health Working Group AUSTRIA Head of Delegation H.E. Ms. Gabriela SELLNER, Ambassador, Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Representatives Mr. Michael KRATZER, Counsellor, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Ms. Andrea KLEINSASSER, Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology Mr. Stephan HEISLER, Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs-Department II.5 Mr. Valentin EDER, Advisor-Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology – Space analyses 2/34 V.21-03220 A/AC.105/C.1/2021/CRP.2 AZERBAIJAN Representatives Mr. Shahin SHAHYAROV, First Secretary, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna BELGIUM Head of Delegation H.E. Mr. Ghislain D’HOOP, Ambassador, Permanent Representatives, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Alternative Head of Delegation Ms. Caroline MOUCHART, Deputy Head of Mission, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Representatives Mr. Jean-François MAYENCE, Advisor, BELSPO Ms. Stien SCHRAUWEN, Attaché, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna BAHRAIN Representatives Mr. Mohamed Ebrahim AL-ASEERI Mr. Mohammed AL-OTHMAN Mr. Muneera AL-MALKI BRAZIL Head of Delegation Mr. Andre Joao RYPL, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Representatives Mr. Thomas DINIZ GUEDES, First Secretary, Deputy Head of the Division of Sea, Antarctica and Space, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mr. Alexsandro SOUZA DE LIMA, General Coordinator, Secretariat of System Coordination of the Institutional Security Cabinet, Office of the Presidency of the Republic. Ms. Adriana CURSINO THOMÈ, Technical Assistant, Special Advisory on International Affairs, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations. Mr. Alessandro José FERREIRA CARVALHO, Head of the International Cooperation Advisory of the Brazilian Space Agency (AEB). Mr. Milton DE FREITAS CHAGAS JUNIOR, Head of the Institutional Relations Service, National Institute for Space Research (INPE). Mr. Eduardo VIEGAS DALLE LUCCA, Projects Division of the Aerospace Science and Technology Department, Brazilian Air Force, Ministry of Defence. Mr. Ulisses BARRES DE ALMEIDA, Researcher at the Brazilian Center for Physical Research, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations. V.21-03220 3/34 A/AC.105/C.1/2021/CRP.2 Ms. Renata CORRÈA RIBEIRO, Analyst at the International Cooperation Advisory of the Brazilian Space Agency (AEB) Mr. Alexandre TOMIO, Science and Technology Analyst, Institutional Relations Service, National Institute for Space Research (INPE) Mr. Jean Robert BATANA PIRES FERREIRA, Secretariate of Entrepreneurship and innovation, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. BULGARIA Representative Mr. Ivan GOSPODINOV, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Mr. Alexey Dimitrov STOEV, Bulgarian Space Research and Technology Institute CANADA Head of Delegation Ms. Lisa CAMPBELL, President, Canadian Space Agency Alternate Heads of Delegation Ms. Eleonora AGNEW, Manager, International and Regulatory Affairs Policy Branch, Canadian Space Agency/Government of Canada Ms. Colleen MAPENDERE, Deputy Director, Space Policy and Regulatory Affairs, Global Affairs Canada Representatives Mr. Alexandre BILODEAU, Counsellor and Deputy Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Ms. Samantha CONDIE, Policy Advisor, Space Policy and Regulatory Affairs Mr. Pierre LANGLOIS, Program Lead, Solar Terrestrial Science, Canadian Space Agency Mr. Ton LONG, CEO of Global Fishing Watch Mr. Ian MANN, Rapporteur, UN Expert Group on Space Weather Mr. Jordan MILLER, International Policy Advisor – Canadian Space Agency Mr. Armin SCHULLER, Programme Coordinator, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Mr. Lauchie SCOTT, Defence Scientist, Defence Research and Development Canada Mr. Sean WHEELER, Sr. Compliance Program Officer, Fisheries & Oceans Canada CHILE Representante Sr. Alvaro GUZMAN, Segundo Secretario, Misión Permanente ante las Naciones Unidas, Viena CHINA Head of Delegation Mr. Jianting YAO, Deputy Director General, Department of International cooperation, China National Space Administration (CNSA) 4/34 V.21-03220 A/AC.105/C.1/2021/CRP.2 Representatives Ms. Hui JIANG, Division Director, Department of International Cooperation, (CNSA) Mr. Fengyu WANG, Department of International Cooperation, (CNSA) Mr. Lin SUN, Department of International Cooperation, (CNSA) Ms. Liang GUO, Department of International Cooperation, (CNSA) Mr. Liang HE, Deputy Director, Department of Treaty and Law, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) Mr. Yu XU, First Secretary, Department of Treaty and Law, (MFA) Ms. Hongyu CUI, Second Secretary, Department of Treaty and Law, MFA Mr. Huanda LI, Officer, Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Emergency Management Mr. Ming LIU, Associate Researcher, Nation Disaster Reduction Centre of China Ministry of Emergency Management Mr. Zhaoyu PEI, Deputy Director General, Lunar Exploration and Space Program Center, (CNSA) Ms. Qian WANG, Division Director, Lunar Exploration and Space Program Center, (CNSA) Mr. Wei WANG, Researcher, Lunar Exploration and Space Program Center, CNSA Mr. Ruihong YANG, Researcher, Lunar Exploration and Space Program Center, CNSA Mr. Qi WANG, Division Director, Earth Observation System and Data Centre, (CNSA) Ms. Jing LIU, Director General, Space Debris Observation and Data Application Center (SODAC), CNSA Mr. Hai JIANG, Officer, Space Debris Observation and Data Application Center (SODAC), CNSA Ms. Chunjuan PAN, Deputy Director General, Space Law Center, (CNSA) Ms. Xiaoxin ZHANG, Researcher, National Satellite Meteorological Center(NSMC) Mr. Gucang CHEN, Deputy Director General, China Satellite Navigation Office Mr. Xiqiang LIN, Deputy Director, China Manned Space Agency Mr. Xiaochum LU, Deputy Director General, China Satellite Navigation Office, International Cooperation Center Mr. Zhigang WANG, Technical Expert, CNSA Mr. Jiachun XIE, Technical Expert, CNSA Ms. Siqing LIU, Technical Expert, CNSA Mr. Dafang ZHUANG, Technical Expert, CNSA Mr. Yong WANG, Technical Expert, CNSA Ms. Jilian WANG, Legal Expert, CNSA Mr. Hui DU, Technical Expert, CNSA Mr. Anwen ZHU, Technical Expert, CNSA Ms. Jingjing XU, Technical Expert, CNSA V.21-03220 5/34 A/AC.105/C.1/2021/CRP.2 Mr. Jingnong WENG, Legal Expert, CNSA Mr. Guozhu GAO, Legal Expert, CNSA Ms. Hong LIU, Technical Expert, CNSA Ms. Yuanyuan GUO, Legal Expert, CNSA Mr. Xiaoyang GAO, Technical Expert, CNSA Mr. Yunjun FAN, Technical Expert, CNSA Mr. Yanbin XU, Technical Expert, CNSA Mr. Bin HU, Counsellor, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna Mr. Zhongrui SUN, Attaché, Permanent Mission to the United Nations, Vienna COLOMBIA Jefe de la Delegación S.E. Sr. Miguel Camilo RUIZ BLANCO, Embajador, Representante Permanente, Misión Permanente ante las Naciones Unidas, Viena Representantes Sr. Carlos Giovanni CORREDOR GUTIÈRREZ, Jefe Oficina de Asuntos Espaciales, Fuerza Aérea Colombiana Sr. Duvan Reynerio OCAMPO PINZÒN, Coordinador de Asuntos Económicos
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Evolved International Lunar Decade Global Exploration Roadmap
    Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (2015) 2016.pdf An Evolved International Lunar Decade Global Exploration Roadmap. David Dunlop. Author1 and Kim Hold- er. Author2, 1 National Space Society, 410 Ashland Ave, Green Bay Wisconsin, [email protected], 2 National Space Society (Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico, Kim [email protected]). Introduction: Since 2007 an International 1 The 2013 GER edition did not reflect the Chinese Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) of 14 government lunar mission series beginning with the of the largest national space agencies has met to look at 2013 Chang’e III successful landing, and reflecting the potential of collaborative planning and coordina- Chang’e IV (now scheduled for 2020 targeting the tion of their national space exploration activities. lunar farside, Change’e V (sample return now sched- While these meetings have generally been closed door uled for 2017) with a Change’6 Mission indicated as a back-up to the sample return mission. (3) events a 2013 edition Global Exploration Roadmap 2 The GER did not reflect any of the Google Lunar X- (GER) was produced (signed off) by 12 of the 14 coun- Prize Missions. Several teams such as Astrobotic and tries reflecting their projected space program activities Moon-X and Team Space IL have received significant in the categories: Low Earth Orbit, Lunar Vicinity, financial support, have developed flight hardware, and Moon, Mars, Asteroids, and Transportation.(1) This while slipping behind the earlier 2015 deadline are GER is a formidable measure of collaborative efforts planning missions to the Moon perhaps succeeding in and spirits and a reflection of significant global coop- 2016 or when more affordable reusable launchers be- eration.
    [Show full text]
  • To All the Craft We've Known Before
    400,000 Visitors to Mars…and Counting Liftoff! A Fly’s-Eye View “Spacers”Are Doing it for Themselves September/October/November 2003 $4.95 to all the craft we’ve known before... 23rd International Space Development Conference ISDC 2004 “Settling the Space Frontier” Presented by the National Space Society May 27-31, 2004 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Location: Clarion Meridian Hotel & Convention Center 737 S. Meridian, Oklahoma City, OK 73108 (405) 942-8511 Room rate: $65 + tax, 1-4 people Planned Programming Tracks Include: Spaceport Issues Symposium • Space Education Symposium • “Space 101” Advanced Propulsion & Technology • Space Health & Biology • Commercial Space/Financing Space Space & National Defense • Frontier America & the Space Frontier • Solar System Resources Space Advocacy & Chapter Projects • Space Law and Policy Planned Tours include: Cosmosphere Space Museum, Hutchinson, KS (all day Thursday, May 27), with Max Ary Oklahoma Spaceport, courtesy of Oklahoma Space Industry Development Authority Oklahoma City National Memorial (Murrah Building bombing memorial) Omniplex Museum Complex (includes planetarium, space & science museums) Look for updates on line at www.nss.org or www.nsschapters.org starting in the fall of 2003. detach here ISDC 2004 Advance Registration Form Return this form with your payment to: National Space Society-ISDC 2004, 600 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E., Suite 201, Washington DC 20003 Adults: #______ x $______.___ Seniors/Students: #______ x $______.___ Voluntary contribution to help fund 2004 awards $______.___ Adult rates (one banquet included): $90 by 12/31/03; $125 by 5/1/04; $150 at the door. Seniors(65+)/Students (one banquet included): $80 by 12/31/03; $100 by 5/1/04; $125 at the door.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Space Demand No 94 1
    Department of Space Demand No 94 1. Space Technology (CS) FINANCIAL OUTLAY (Rs OUTPUTS 2020-21 OUTCOME 2020-21 in Cr) Targets Targets 2020-21 Output Indicators Outcome Indicators 2020-21 2020-21 1. Research & 1.1 No. of Earth 05 1. Augmentation of Space 1.1 Introduction of 01 Developmen Observation (EO) Infrastructure for Ocean Colour t, design of spacecrafts ready for providing continuity of Monitor with technologies launch EO Services with 13 spectral and improved capabilities bands realization 1.2 Number of Launches of 05 1.2 Sea surface 01 of space Polar Satellite Launch temperature systems for Vehicle(PSLV) sensor launch 1.3 Number of Launches of 01 1.3 Continuation 01 vehicles and Geosynchronous Satellite of Microwave spacecrafts. Launch Vehicle - GSLV Imaging in C- Mk-III band. 1.4 Number of Launches of 02 2. Ensuring operational 2.1 No. of 05 9761.50 Geosynchronous Satellite launch services for Indigenous Launch Vehicle -GSLV domestic and commercial launches using Operational Flights Satellites. PSLV. 3. Self-sufficiency in 3.1 Operational 01 launching 4 Tone class of launches of communication satellites GSLV Mk III into Geo-synchronous transfer orbit. 4. Self-sufficiency in 4.1 No of 02 launching 2.5 - 3 Tone indigenous class of Communication launches using Satellites into Geo- GSLV. synchronous Transfer Orbit. 2. Space Applications (CS) FINANCIAL OUTLAY (Rs OUTPUTS 2020-21 OUTCOME 2020-21 in Cr) Targets Targets 2020-21 Output Indicators Outcome Indicators 2020-21 2020-21 1. Design & 1.1 No. of EO/ Communication 11 1. Information on optimal 1.1 Availability of 07 Develop Payloads realized management of natural advanced sensors to ment of 1.2 Information support for major 85% resource, natural provide space based Applicati disaster events (as %ge of Total disasters, agricultural information with ons for events occurred) planning, infrastructure improved capability 1810.00 EO, 1.3 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years of Australia in Space
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 153, part 1, 2020, pp. 46–57. ISSN 0035-9173/20/010046-12 Sixty years of Australia in space Kerrie Dougherty Space Humanities Department, International Space University, Strasbourg, France Email: [email protected] Abstract Australia’s involvement in space activities commenced in 1957, at the beginning of the Space Age, with space tracking and sounding rocket launches at Woomera. By 1960, Australia was considered one of the leading space-active nations and in 1967 became one of the earliest countries to launch its own satellite. Yet by 1980, Australia’s space prominence had dwindled, with the country lacking both a national space agency and a coherent national space policy. Despite attempts in the latter part of the 1980s to develop an Australian space industry, the lack of a coherent and consistent national space policy and an effective co-ordinating body, left Australia constantly “punching below its weight” in global space activities until the Twenty First Century. This paper will briefly examine the often-contradictory history of Australian space activities from 1957 to the announcement of the Australian Space Agency in 2017, providing background and context for the later papers in this issue. Introduction Launchpad: the Woomera or 60,000 years the Indigenous people of Rocket Range FAustralia have looked to the sky, using “If the Woomera Range did not already exist, the stars to determine their location, find the proposal that Australia should engage in their way across the land and mark the a program of civil space research would be passage of the seasons and the best times unrealistic”.
    [Show full text]
  • Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 6-2013 The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress Andrew Follett College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Follett, Andrew, "The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress" (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 584. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/584 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Government from The College of William and Mary by Andrew Follett Accepted for . John Gilmour, Director . Sophia Hart . Rowan Lockwood Williamsburg, VA May 3, 2013 1 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Part 1: Introduction and Background 4 Pre Soviet Collapse: Early American Failures in Space 13 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Successful Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo Programs 17 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Quasi-Successful Shuttle Program 22 Part 2: The Thin Years, Repeated Failure in NASA in the Post-Soviet Era 27 The Failure of the Space Exploration Initiative 28 The Failed Vision for Space Exploration 30 The Success of Unmanned Space Flight 32 Part 3: Why NASA Fails 37 Part 4: Putting this to the Test 87 Part 5: Changing the Method.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennedy's Quest: Leadership in Space
    Kennedy’s Quest: Leadership in Space Overview Topic: “Space Race” Grade Level: 9-12 Subject Area: US History Time Required: One class period. Goals/Rationale: The decision by the Kennedy Administration to make a manned lunar landing the major goal of the US space program derived from political as well as scientific motivations. In this lesson plan, students do a close reading of four primary sources related to the US space program in 1961, analyzing how and why public statements made by the White House regarding space may have differed from private statements made within the Kennedy Administration. Essential Questions: How was the “Space Race” connected to the Cold War? How and why might the White House communicate differently in public and in private? How might the Administration garner support for their policy? Objectives Students will be able to: analyze primary sources, considering the purpose of the source, the audience, and the occasion. analyze the differences in the tone or content of the primary sources. explain the Kennedy Administration’s arguments for putting a human on the Moon by the end of the 1960s. Connections to Curriculum (Standards) National History Standards US History, Era 9: Postwar United States (1945 to early 1970s) Standard 2A: The student understands the international origins and domestic consequences of the Cold War. Historical Thinking Skills Standard 2: Historical Comprehension Reconstruct the literal meaning of a historical passage. Appreciate historical perspectives . Historical Thinking Skills Standard 4: Historical Research Capabilities Support interpretations with historical evidence. Massachusetts History and Social Science Curriculum Frameworks USII [T.5] 1. Using primary sources such as campaign literature and debates, news articles/analyses, editorials, and television coverage, analyze the important policies and events that took place during the presidencies of John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Science in the Eyes of Giant Telescopes
    Planetary Science in the Eyes of Giant Telescopes Franck Marchis (Carl Sagan Center at the SETI Ins<tute) Feeding the Giants Workshop, Ischia, Italy, August 30 2011, Outline ELTs = Extremely Large Telescopes (E-ELT, TMT, GMT) • Solar System Exploraon – Why Exploring the Solar System with ELTs – Space Mission Programs: Why, Who, Where, When? • Poten<al of the ELTs for Solar System Science – High Angular imaging coupled with spectroscopy in the NIR to explore Io, Titan, and TNOs – Low res UV-NIR spectroscopic combined with All-sky surveys 402 Years of Telescopes Why Planetary Science and the ELTs? • Long heritage of telescopic observaons for the study of the Solar System • Started in 1609 with Galileo Galilei – First publicaon in modern astronomy based on telescope data – Discoveries in the field of Planetary Science • Galilean Moons • Roughness of the Moon surface • Disk appearance of planets & phase of Venus • In 2009, 40% of Keck PR and 25% of Keck AO publicaons are based on Planetary Science results • Strong Public Interest for Planetary Science Toys in Japan Pluto protests 51 Years of Space Missions • First aempts to reach Mars (1960) and Venus (1961) • ~200 solar, lunar and interplanetary missions • More reliable technologies -> more space missions • More accessible technologies -> more countries have access to space (e.g. Japan, China, India,…) • Could the ELTs contribute to Planetary Science in this context? 51 Years of Space Missions (2009) Naonal Geographic 51 Years of Space Missions Inner Solar System NEA 51 Years of Space Missions
    [Show full text]
  • India and China Space Programs: from Genesis of Space Technologies to Major Space Programs and What That Means for the Internati
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2009 India And China Space Programs: From Genesis Of Space Technologies To Major Space Programs And What That Means For The Internati Gaurav Bhola University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Bhola, Gaurav, "India And China Space Programs: From Genesis Of Space Technologies To Major Space Programs And What That Means For The Internati" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4109. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4109 INDIA AND CHINA SPACE PROGRAMS: FROM GENESIS OF SPACE TECHNOLOGIES TO MAJOR SPACE PROGRAMS AND WHAT THAT MEANS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY by GAURAV BHOLA B.S. University of Central Florida, 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2009 Major Professor: Roger Handberg © 2009 Gaurav Bhola ii ABSTRACT The Indian and Chinese space programs have evolved into technologically advanced vehicles of national prestige and international competition for developed nations. The programs continue to evolve with impetus that India and China will have the same space capabilities as the United States with in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus
    NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus NASAs Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus Committee on NASAs Strategic Direction Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu PREPUBLICATION COPYSUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study is based on work supported by Contract NNH10CC48B between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL Call for Papers & Registration of Interest
    ORGANIZED BY: HOSTED BY: st 71 INTERNATIONAL ASTRONAUTICAL CONGRESS 12–16 October 2020 | Dubai, United Arab Emirates Call for Papers & Registration of Interest Second Announcement SUPPORTED BY: Inspire, Innovate & Discover for the Benefit of Humankind IAC2020.ORG Contents 1. Message from the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 2 2. Message from the Local Organizing Committee 2 3. Message from the IPC Co-Chairs 3 4. Messages from the Partner Organizations 4 5. International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 5 6. International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) 10 7. International Institute of Space Law (IISL) 11 8. Message from the IAF Vice President for Technical Activities 12 9. IAC 2020 Technical Sessions Deadlines Calendar 49 10. Preliminary IAC 2020 at a Glance 50 11. Instructions to Authors 51 Connecting @ll Space People 12. Space in the United Arab Emirates 52 www.iafastro.org IAF Alliance Programme Partners 2019 1 71st IAC International Astronautical Congress 12–16 October 2020, Dubai 1. Message from the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 3. Message from the International Programme Committee (IPC) Greetings! Co-Chairs It is our great pleasure to invite you to the 71st International Astronautical Congress (IAC) to take place in Dubai, United Arab Emirates On behalf of the International Programme Committee, it is a great pleasure to invite you to submit an abstract for the 71st International from 12 – 16 October 2020. Astronautical Congress IAC 2020 that will be held in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The IAC is an initiative to bring scientists, practitioners, engineers and leaders of space industry and agencies together in a single platform to discuss recent research breakthroughs, technical For the very first time, the IAC will open its doors to the global space community in the United Arab Emirates, the first Arab country to advances, existing opportunities and emerging space technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 02/16/2021 11:18:01 AM
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 02/16/2021 11:18:01 AM 02/12/21 Friday This material is distributed by Ghebi LLC on behalf of Federal State Unitary Enterprise Rossiya Segodnya International Information Agency, and additional information is on file with the Department of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia. Lincoln Project Faces Exodus of Advisers Amid Sexual Harassment Coverup Scandal by Morgan Artvukhina Donald Trump was a political outsider in the 2016 US presidential election, and many Republicans refused to accept him as one of their own, dubbing themselves "never-Trump" Republicans. When he sought re-election in 2020, the group rallied in support of his Democratic challenger, now the US president, Joe Biden. An increasing number of senior figures in the never-Trump political action committee The Lincoln Project (TLP) have announced they are leaving, with three people saying Friday they were calling it quits in the wake of a sexual assault scandal involving co-founder John Weaver. "I've always been transparent about all my affiliations, as I am now: I told TLP leadership yesterday that I'm stepping down as an unpaid adviser as they sort this out and decide their future direction and organization," Tom Nichols, a “never-Trump” Republican who supported the group’s effort to rally conservative support for US President Joe Biden in the 2020 election, tweeted on Friday afternoon. Nichols was joined by another adviser, Kurt Bardella and by Navvera Hag, who hosted the PAC’s online show “The Lincoln Report.” Late on Friday, Lincoln Project co-founder Steve Schmidt reportedly announced his resignation following accusations from PAC employees that he handled the harassment scandal poorly, according to the Daily Beast.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Debris
    IADC-11-04 April 2013 Space Debris IADC Assessment Report for 2010 Issued by the IADC Steering Group Table of Contents 1. Foreword .......................................................................... 1 2. IADC Highlights ................................................................ 2 3. Space Debris Activities in the United Nations ................... 4 4. Earth Satellite Population .................................................. 6 5. Satellite Launches, Reentries and Retirements ................ 10 6. Satellite Fragmentations ................................................... 15 7. Collision Avoidance .......................................................... 17 8. Orbital Debris Removal ..................................................... 18 9. Major Meetings Addressing Space Debris ........................ 20 Appendix: Satellite Break-ups, 2000-2010 ............................ 22 IADC Assessment Report for 2010 i Acronyms ADR Active Debris Removal ASI Italian Space Agency CNES Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (France) CNSA China National Space Agency CSA Canadian Space Agency COPUOS Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, United Nations DLR German Aerospace Center ESA European Space Agency GEO Geosynchronous Orbit region (region near 35,786 km altitude where the orbital period of a satellite matches that of the rotation rate of the Earth) IADC Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee ISRO Indian Space Research Organization ISS International Space Station JAXA Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency LEO Low
    [Show full text]