DOCSLIB.ORG

Accident Reports (Incl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accident Reports (Incl MS-012 Richard G. Snyder Papers NTSB reports, safety recommendations, studies, etc. accident reports (incl. international) other reports: Univ. of Michigan GA Investigations Studies Drawer 57-60 Drawer 65-68 Drawer File Title Dates 57 (1 of 2) 1 NTSB 81-10 Northwest Airlines, DC-10-40, N143US, 1981 Leesburg, VA, 1/31/81 57 (1 of 2) 2 NTSB 81-12, N468AC, Air California Boeing 737-293, Santa 1981 Ana, Cal, 2-17-81 57 (1 of 2) 3 NTSB 81-16, DC-9-80, N1002G, Yuma, Arizona, 6-19-80 1981 57 (1 of 2) 4 NTSB-AAR-82-4 1982 Sky Train, Lear 24 Felt, OK, Oct. 1, 1982 1981 57 (1 of 2) 5 NTSB-AAR-82-6 Bell 206B/ Piper PA-34 Midair NJ, 9/23/81 1982 57 (1 of 2) 6 NTSB-AAR-82-7 1982 Pilgrim, DH6 Providence RI, Feb. 21, 1982 82 57 (1 of 2) 7 NTSB-AAR-82-8 1982, Jan 13, Air Flor.737, Wash, DC 1982 57 (1 of 2) 8 NTSB-AAR-82-9 3/27/82, Lufkin Beech BE-200 Parker, CO 1982 57 (1 of 2) 9 NTSB-AAR-82-10 1982 Midair col, FlllD Cessna 206 Clovis, 1982 NM, 2/6/80 57 (1 of 2) 10 NTSB-AAR-82-11 1982, Jan.5, Empire Piper-31, Ithaca, NY 1982 57 (1 of 2) 11 NTSB-84-02 Western Hellicopters, Bell UH-1B, N87701, 1984 Valencia, Cal, 7/23/83 57 (1 of 2) 12 NTSB-AAR-82-12 1/3/82 Ashland Cessna 414A Ashland VA 1982 57 (1 of 2) 13 NTSB-82-14 Reeve Aleutian Airways, N1HON-YS-11A 1982 N169RV, King Salmon, Alaska, 2/16/82 57 (1 of 2) 14 NTSB-82-15 World Airways, DC-10-30CF, N113WA, Boston, 1982 MA, 1/23/82 57 (1 of 2) 15 NTSB-82-16 Gifford Aviation, DHC-6, N103AQ, Hooper Bay, 1982 Alaska, 5/16/82 57 (1 of 2) 16 NTSB-83-01 Ibex Corp, Learjet 23, N100TA, Atlantic Ocean, 1983 5/6/82 57 (1 of 2) 17 NTSB-83-02 Pan Am, Boeing, 727-235, N4737, Kenner, 1983 Louisiana, 7/9/82 57 (1 of 2) 18 NTSB AAR-83/04 1983, Cessna Citation II N2CA, Mt, View, 1983 MO, 11/18/82 57 (1 of 2) 19 NTSB-83-05 A.G. Stanle, Canadiar CL-600 N805C, Hailev, 1983 Idaho, 1/3/83 57 (1 of 2) 20 NTSB-83-06 Eastern Airlines, Boeing 727-225, N8838E, 1983 Raleigh N, Carolina, 11-12-75 57 (1 of 2) 21 NTSB-83-08 Republic Airlines, Convair 580 N844H, Brainerd, 1983 Minn, 1/9/83 57 (1 of 2) 22 NTSB-AAR-82-10 2/6/80 USAF F-111D/Cessna Midair 1982 Clovis, NM 57 (1 of 2) 23 NTSB-84-01 McCauley Aviation, Mitsubishi MU-2B, N72B, 1984 Jeffersonville, Georgia, 3/24/83 57 (1 of 2) 24 NTSB-83-07 United Airlines, DC-8-54F, Detroit, MI, 1/11/83 1983 57 (1 of 2) 25 NTSB-84-03 Sierra Pacific Airlines, DHC-6-300, N361V, 1984 Hailev, Idaho, 2/15/83 57 (1 of 2) 26 NTSB-84-04 Eastern Airlines, Lockheed L-1011, N334EA, 1984 Miami, FL, 5/5/83 57 (1 of 2) 27 NTSB-84-05 Las Vegas Airlines, Piper PA-31-350, Grand 1984 Canyon, Arizona, 8/17/83 57 (1 of 2) 28 NTSB-84-06 Landry Aviation Lockheed L-18, N116CA, 1984 Silvana, Washington, 8/21/83 57 (1 of 2) 29 NTSB-84-07 Midair Collision, F-4C/Beech D-55, Cherry 1984 Point, N. Carolina, 1/9/83 57 (1 of 2) 30 NTSB AAR-84-08 Flying Tigers DC8-63, N797FT, Norfolk, 1984 VA, 10/25/83 57 (1 of 2) 31 NTSB-84-09 Air Canada, DC-9-32, C-FTLU Covington, 1984 Kentucky, 6/2/83 57 (1 of 2) 32 NTSB-84-10 Collision, DC-10-30 & Piper PA-31-350, 1984 Anchorage, Alaska, 12/23/83 57 (1 of 2) 33 NTSB-AAR-84/11, Central Airlines Learjet 25, Newark, N.J. 1984 3/30/83 57 (1 of 2) 34 NTSB/AAR-84/12 Pilgrim Airlines, Fokker F27-100 JFK N.Y. 1984 1/13/84 57 (1 of 2) 35 NTSB/AAR-84/12 (N.Y.) 1984, Fokker F27-100 Aircraft 1984 Accident Rept. 57 (1 of 2) 36 NTSB/AAR-84/13 Air Canada, Lockheed L-1011, C-FTNJ, 1984 Charleston, S.C. 11/24/83 57 (1 of 2) 37 NTSB/AAR-84/14 W. Helicopters, Bell UH-1B Valencia, CA, 1984 7/23/82, (Supercedes NTSB/AAT-84/02) 57 (1 of 2) 38 NTSB-RP-84/01, Aviation Acc. Investigation, April 26-28/83 1984 Springfield, VA 57 (1 of 2) 39 NTSB/AAR-85/06 Accid. Rept. 1982, World Airways- 1985 McDonnel Douglas(Boston) 57 (1 of 2) 40 AV. Week & Space Tech. 1984, Uncontrolled Decent Cited by 1984 NTSB 57 (1 of 2) 41 NTSB Annual 1981, Report to Congress 1981 57 (1 of 2) 42 NTSB Cockpit Recording 1985, Galaxy Electa Reno Crash- 1985 Jan. '85 57 (1 of 2) 43 NTSB Accident Rept 1986 Delta L-1011 Crash 1985, Dallas 1986 134 of 163 Fatal 57 (1 of 2) 44 NTSB Rules 1986, Limit role in investigation 1986 57 (1 of 2) 45 NTSB 79-6 Briefs, Civil Aviation 1979 1979 57 (1 of 2) 46 NTSB HUMAN FACTORS REPORT 6/1/79, SIKORSKY S- 1979 61L N618PA Newark 4-79 57 (1 of 2) 47 NTSB-AAS-79-2 1979, Twin Eng. Failures '72-'76 1979 57 (1 of 2) 48 NTSB Special Study, AAS-79-1 1979, Single Engine 1979 Accidents 72-76 57 (1 of 2) 49 NTSB Sp. Study 1979 SE Gen. Av. Accid. '72-'76 1979 57 (1 of 2) 50 NTSB Spec. Rept. 1974 G/A Fuel Starv. 70-72 1974 57 (2 of 2) 51 NTSB Stat, Review 1970, 1964-68 Corp/Exec. Accid. 1970 57 (2 of 2) 52 NTSB Accident. Briefs 1968?, Corp/ Exec Accid. 1967 1967? 57 (2 of 2) 53 NTSB Guidelines 1981, Deligation-Invest. FAA 1981 57 (2 of 2) 54 NTSB-AAR-81-17 Dec.81 Univ. Airways Beech 65-A80 1981 57 (2 of 2) 55 NTSB Sp. Invest. Rept. 1981, FSS Wx Briefing SIR-81-3 1981 57 (2 of 2) 56 NTSB-AAR-81-13 1981, Texas Av. Lockheed Jetstar, White 1981 Plains 2/11/81 57 (2 of 2) 57 NTSB-AAR-81-11 1/20/81, Cascade Beech99A Spok. 1981 57 (2 of 2) 58 USMC EA-6B Accid. Rept, USSN/MITZ 5/26/81 1982 57 (2 of 2) 59 NTSB Part 431A/C Accident Reporting 1974 57 (2 of 2) 60 NTSB-SIR-81-6 Spc. Invest. Rept. A/C Separation Incid. 1981 57 (2 of 2) 61 Av. Wk (NTSB Rept.) 1978, Learjet 24B Crash Palm Springs, 1978 1977 57 (2 of 2) 62 Av. Wk (NTSB) 1985, Zantop Electra 30 May 1984 Crash 1985 57 (2 of 2) 63 Av. Week (NTSB Invest.) 1985, China Airliner 747SP 4 Eng. 1985 Loss, 4.5 G Descent 57 (2 of 2) 64 NTSB Special Report 1984, Av. Accident Invest. Symposium 1984 57 (2 of 2) 65 Galaxy Electra 188 29/1/1985, Crash landing Dobbins AFB 1985 57 (2 of 2) 66 NTSB/ARC-84/01 1985, Annual Review Accidents, U.S 1985 Carrier Operations 1981 57 (2 of 2) 67 NTSB/AAR-85/03 1985, Air Illinois Hawker, Pinckneyville, 1985 IL, 10/11/83 57 (2 of 2) 68 NTSB Safety Recommend. May 1979, A-79-16 Thru -20 1979 57 (2 of 2) 69 NTSB Safety Recommend. June 1979, A-79-35 Thru -39 1979 57 (2 of 2) 70 NTSB Prelims 1979, Drug Related 1979 57 (2 of 2) 71 NTSB-AAR-79-16 Beech 70 Excal. Conv. Gulfport MS, 1979 3/1/79 57 (2 of 2) 72 NTSB-AAR-79-12, Nord 262, Clarksburg Wv, 2/12/79 1979 57 (2 of 2) 73 NTSB 1972, Recommendations 1972 57 (2 of 2) 74 NTSB AAR-79-10, Dehavillsrd DH6-300, Cheyenne WY, 1979 2/27/79 57 (2 of 2) 75 NTSB AAR-79-8, Piper PA-31-360, Las Vegas, NV, 8/30/78 1979 57 (2 of 2) 76 NTSB-AAR-75-8 1975, IBM, Grumman G-1159, SC, 6/74 1975 57 (2 of 2) 77 NTSB AAR-79-6 1979, Dehavilland DHC-6 Twin Otter, 1979 Steamboat Springs, CO, 12/4/78 57 (2 of 2) 78 NTSB Special Study 72-4, Radioactive Matrl. Cargo. 4/27/72 1972 57 (2 of 2) 79 NTSB AAR-79-4 1979 Convair 580 Kalamazoo, MI, 7/25/78 1978 57 (2 of 2) 80 NTSB AAR-79-3 1979 Cessna Citation And DC-9-30, La 1978 Guardia Airport, 6/21/78 57 (2 of 2) 81 NTSB 1982, Safety Recomm. 1982 57 (2 of 2) 82 NTSB AAR-79-2 1979, BAC 1-11, Rochester, NY, 7/9/78 1978 57 (2 of 2) 83 NTSB Special Study 79-2, Hazard. Matls. Non-Comp. 8/3/79 1979 57 (2 of 2) 84 NTSB 78-11 BRIEFS 1978, U.S. General Aviation-1976 1978 57 (2 of 2) 85 NTSB PRELIMINARY REPORT—AIR, CARRIER 1978 ACCIDENTS 1976-1977 57 (2 of 2) 86 NTSB. 79-1 1978, Continental DC-10, Los Angeles, Cal, 1978 3/1/78 57 (2 of 2) 87 NTSB 78-14 1978, Falcon Jet N121GW, Cessna 150M, 1978 Memphis Tenn, 5-18 57 (2 of 2) 88 NTSB AAR-78-15, Beech 99, Richland, WA, 2/10/78 1978 57 (2 of 2) 89 NTSB AAR-79-1 McDonnell-Douglas DC-10-10, Los 1979 Angeles, CA, 3/1/78 58 (1 of 2) 1 NTSB-AAR-79-13, Nord 262, Marina Del Ray, CA, 3/10/79 1979 58 (1 of 2) 2 NTSB AAR-78-14 Midair, Falcon Jet and Cessna 150M, 1978 Memphis, TN, 5/18/78 58 (1 of 2) 3 NTSB AAR-78-13, Boeing 727-235, Pensacola, FL, 5/8/78 1978 58 (1 of 2) 4 NTSB-AAS-79-1 Spec.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airline Schedules
    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Nov Hires Report
    Hire Heroes USA Confirmed Hires 2017 Through November 30 Service (Last) Branch Service Rank Other Hiring Company Name Position Hired For Army CW-2 Special Security Officer Navy CW-4 Black Knight Financial Services IT Production Manager Army CW-4 ASM Research Benefits Lead Army 0-1 General Dynamics Manufacturing Engineer Army 0-1 Scribe America Medical Scribe Gwinnett County Office of Strategy & Army 0-1 Performance Mgmt. Business Analyst Marines 0-1 Campus Hollywood Instructor- Theater History and Acting Air Force 0-1 Global Threat & Risk Analyst Navy 0-1 Advanced Systems Development Help Desk Specialist Army W-5 United Airlines Pilot Marines W-5 San Diego Passport Agency Passport Support Associate Army W-5 Selective Service System Program Analyst Marines W-5 Ulta Beauty Warehouse Manager Army W-5 DOD Pilot Military Program Analyst-Organization and Personnel Force Development Army W-5 US Army DOD Directorate Army W-5 NES Associates Technical Director Army W-5 Program Manager Army W-5 AFS Army Fleet Service Test Flight Pilot Army W-5 Investigator Navy W-5 R3 Strategic support Group Manager Army W-5 AFSC/Magellan Federal Training Center Manager Navy W-5 Naval Systems Incorporated Senior Logistics Analyst Army W-5 Aviation Specialties Unlimited Aviator Marines W-5 District Manager Army W-4 TFW - Tsay Ferguson-Williams Deputy Project Manager Army W-4 CACI International Lessons Learned Analyst Army W-4 Colorado Springs Police Department Criminal Investigator Army W-4 Intel Corporation D1D Manufacturing Technician Army W-4 Erickson Air Crane
    [Show full text]
  • USCIS - H-1B Approved Petitioners Fis…
    5/4/2010 USCIS - H-1B Approved Petitioners Fis… H-1B Approved Petitioners Fiscal Year 2009 The file below is a list of petitioners who received an approval in fiscal year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009) of Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, requesting initial H- 1B status for the beneficiary, regardless of when the petition was filed with USCIS. Please note that approximately 3,000 initial H- 1B petitions are not accounted for on this list due to missing petitioner tax ID numbers. Related Files H-1B Approved Petitioners FY 2009 (1KB CSV) Last updated:01/22/2010 AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 10042060. (Posted 04/20/10) uscis.gov/…/menuitem.5af9bb95919f3… 1/1 5/4/2010 http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resource… NUMBER OF H-1B PETITIONS APPROVED BY USCIS IN FY 2009 FOR INITIAL BENEFICIARIES, EMPLOYER,INITIAL BENEFICIARIES WIPRO LIMITED,"1,964" MICROSOFT CORP,"1,318" INTEL CORP,723 IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,695 PATNI AMERICAS INC,609 LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED,602 ERNST & YOUNG LLP,481 INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,440 UST GLOBAL INC,344 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP,328 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,320 CISCO SYSTEMS INC,308 ACCENTURE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS,287 KPMG LLP,287 ORACLE USA INC,272 POLARIS SOFTWARE LAB INDIA LTD,254 RITE AID CORPORATION,240 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO,236 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP,235 COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS US CORP,233 MPHASIS CORPORATION,229 SATYAM COMPUTER SERVICES LIMITED,219 BLOOMBERG,217 MOTOROLA INC,213 GOOGLE INC,211 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCH SYSTEM,187 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND,185 UNIV OF MICHIGAN,183 YAHOO INC,183
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1999 No. 133 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was SCHEDULE If Congress does not reauthorize the called to order by the President pro Mr. MCCAIN. Mr. President, today Airport Improvement Program (AIP), tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. the Senate will resume consideration the Federal Aviation Administration of the pending amendments to the FAA (FAA) will be prohibited from issuing PRAYER bill. Senators should be aware that much needed grants to airports in every state, regardless of whether or The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John rollcall votes are possible today prior not funds have been appropriated. We Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: to the 12:30 recess in an attempt to have now entered fiscal year 2000, and Lord of all life, our prayer is like complete action on the bill by the end we cannot put off reauthorization of breathing. We breathe in Your Spirit of the day. As a reminder, first-degree the AIP. The program lapsed as of last and breathe out praise to You. Help us amendments to the bill must be filed to take a deep breath of Your love, Friday. Every day that goes by without by 10 a.m. today. As a further re- an AIP authorization is another day peace, and joy so that we will be re- minder, debate on three judicial nomi- freshed and ready for the day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maine Airport System Plan : Summary Report
    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons Maine Collection 11-1977 The Maine Airport System Plan : Summary Report Systems Analysis & Research Corp. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection Part of the Management and Operations Commons, Other Business Commons, Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons, Tourism and Travel Commons, and the Transportation Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Systems Analysis & Research Corp., "The Maine Airport System Plan : Summary Report" (1977). Maine Collection. 42. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection/42 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Collection by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contents Page No. .fOREWORD iii OVERVIEW 2 Purpose of the Plan 2 Goals ..... 2 Other Issues . 3 Factors Considered 3 The Plan 4 Costs 5 Funding 5 Implementation . 5 System Plan/Master Plan Relationship 7 BACKGROUND 8 Introduction 8 Method of Approach 9 Participants 9 AVIATION IN MAINE 10 Scheduled Air Service 10 Air Cargo 10 General Aviation Facilities 11 Military Aviation 11 Airports ....... 12 Aircraft and Operations ..... 12 Problems ....... 13 PREPARATION OF THE PLAN ..... 14 Description of Alternative Plans . 15 Estimation of Required Development 16 Evaluation and Comparison of Alternative Plans 16 THE PLAN .......... 18 New Airports . 18 Privately-Owned Airports 20 Airport Developments Proposed 20 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN 22 Financial Assistance . 22 Technical Assistance . 25 Assignment of Priorities 25 Public Meetings 26 Legislation ....... 27 APPENDIX A -Airport Needs by County .
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S11921
    October 5, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE S11921 is going to create division and animus Mr. SCHUMER. I thank the Senators Association or by a State Federation of in this country of ours. from Arizona, Oklahoma, and Con- Police Chiefs. I don't think we have Mr. NICKLES. Mr. President, regular necticut for their courtesy, and the done that in my Senate career. order. I will answer a question. If the President as well. Does the Senator know of any in- Senator wants to make a speech, he I would like to make some remarks stance where we have ignored the rec- can make the speech on his own time. in contraposition to the Senator from ommendations of major law enforce- Mr. SCHUMER. I will yield back my Oklahoma. I say that without casting ment officers? time to the Senator, retract my ques- any impugning of any motivations as The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- tion, and ask unanimous consent that I to why people voted. ator's 3 minutes have expired. might speak for 3 minutes. It seems to me that this being, as I Mr. SCHUMER. I ask unanimous con- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there understand it, the first time we have sent for 30 seconds to respond to the objection? this year rejected a Senate candidate Senator's question. The Senator from Oklahoma. on the floorÐand I understand that The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without Mr. NICKLES. I didn't know my col- there were recommendations from the objection, it is so ordered. league wanted to engage in this. I was home StateÐI still find myself very Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Crash Short, Downeast Airlines, Inc., Dehavilland DHC-6-200, N68DE, Rockland, Maine, May 30, 1979
    Crash short, Downeast Airlines, Inc., DeHavilland DHC-6-200, N68DE, Rockland, Maine, May 30, 1979 Micro-summary: This DeHavilland DHC-6-200 crashed during a non-precision approach (the Nance crash) Event Date: 1979-05-30 at 2055 EDT Investigative Body: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), USA Investigative Body's Web Site: http://www.ntsb.gov/ Cautions: 1. Accident reports can be and sometimes are revised. Be sure to consult the investigative agency for the latest version before basing anything significant on content (e.g., thesis, research, etc). 2. Readers are advised that each report is a glimpse of events at specific points in time. While broad themes permeate the causal events leading up to crashes, and we can learn from those, the specific regulatory and technological environments can and do change. Your company's flight operations manual is the final authority as to the safe operation of your aircraft! 3. Reports may or may not represent reality. Many many non-scientific factors go into an investigation, including the magnitude of the event, the experience of the investigator, the political climate, relationship with the regulatory authority, technological and recovery capabilities, etc. It is recommended that the reader review all reports analytically. Even a "bad" report can be a very useful launching point for learning. 4. Contact us before reproducing or redistributing a report from this anthology. Individual countries have very differing views on copyright! We can advise you on the steps to follow. Aircraft Accident Reports on DVD, Copyright © 2006 by Flight Simulation Systems, LLC All rights reserved. www.fss.aero CONTENTS SYNOPSIS .........................
    [Show full text]
  • AIR NEW ENGLAND (1970-1974) a Case Study of a Commuter Air Carrier
    AIR NEW ENGLAND (1970-1974) A Case Study of a Commuter Air Carrier Raymond A. Ausrotas Terry P.Blumer October 1975 FTL Report R-75-9 AIR NEW ENGLAND (1970-1974) A Case Study of a Commuter Air Carrier Raymond A. Ausrotas Terry P. Blumer October 1975 Flight Transportation Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. 02139 FTL Report T5 7 -domin INNIIIINiilik Iiii Iw wiiii dMI1111 IWIwk i0im I I., , 1111,11IIIHIII IN& Table of Contents 1. Industry Background ................................................... 1 2. Chronological History of Air New England ............................. 12 3. Evolution of Route Structure, Fare Policy and Competitive Position ....16 4. Aircraft Fleet, Traffic and Financial Status.........................46 5. Summary .............................................................. 61 Acknowledgement This study was sponsored by the Department of Transportation. The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful assistance of Mr. James J. Gansle of the Industry Analysis Division, Department of Transportation. 'innmsniin ,siggi 1 1. INDUSTRY BACKGROUND Commuter air carriers operate under Part 298 of the Civil Aero- nautics Board's Economic Regulations as a sub-classification of air taxi operators. Commuters perform at least five round trips per week between two or more points pursuant to published flight schedules, or transport mail under contract with the U.S. Postal Service. They are currently allowed to operate aircraft with a maximum passenger capacity of 30 seats and a maximum payload capacity of up to 7,500 pounds. Apart from these aircraft capacity limitations, the CAB imposes almost no regulatory controls over commuter carriers: there is complete freedom of entry and exit from markets, and no rate or route control.
    [Show full text]
  • NAOMS Reference Report
    . NAOMS Reference Report Concepts, Methods, and Development Roadmap Prepared by Battelle Memorial Institute for NASA Ames Research Center Contract NNA05AC07C November 30, 2007 NAOMS Reference Report Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary............................................................................................. 1 2. Background .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Gore Commission Report ......................................................................... 3 2.2. Preexisting Sources of Aviation Safety Data......................................... 3 3. The NAOMS Concept .......................................................................................... 6 3.1. Tapping the Knowledge of System Operators...................................... 6 3.2. Data Reliability............................................................................................ 7 3.3 Emphasis on Experience Rather Than Opinion.................................... 7 3.4. Voluntary, Confidential, and Anonymous............................................. 8 3.5. Methodological Success Measures .......................................................... 8 3.5.1. Response Rate.............................................................................. 8 3.5.2. Data Quality.................................................................................. 8 4. Development Roadmap...................................................................................... 10
    [Show full text]
  • Major Airline Disasters
    Major Air Disasters -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Major Air Disasters Involving Commercial Airlines 1937-2021 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Incidents are listed in a table in chronological order giving details of Crash Date, Location, Aircraft Type, Airline, Likely Reason for Crash, Fatalities. Certain other ATC and Japan related incidents are also listed. Updated: January 31, 2021 / H. (Mike) Maekawa, [email protected] : Notify if an error noticed. Date: Crash Site: Aircraft: Airline: Likely Reason for Crash as Reported: Fatalities Pax+Crew 06/05/1937 Manchester Township, New Jersey, USA. The Hindenburg airship LZ 129 Hindenburg caught fire and was destroyed during its attempt to dock with its mooring mast at Naval Air Station Lakehurst. 35 fatalities (13 pax+22 crew) from the 97 on board (36 pax + 61 crew), and an additional fatality on the ground. (Personally. I was born 8days after this incident.HM) 1 Major Air Disasters 24/08/1938 Haneda, Tokyo, Japan, Japan Flight School (日本飛行学校) Hanriot HD.14 trainer airplane (J-BJDH) with 1 flight instructor and 1 student pilot and Japan Air Transport （日本航空輸送）Fokker Super Universal aircraft (J-BJDO) with 1 pilot and 2 student pilots, collided in the air over Omori, Tokyo. Japan’s first air accident in the history. Mid Air Collision. 85/5crew+80 on gnd. 16/01/1942 Potosi Mountain, Nevada, USA, TWA, DC-3, LAS-LAX, CFIT, 22/22, Carol Lombard killed. Carole Lombard 2 Major Air Disasters 28/10/1949 Pico da Vara, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal, Air France AF009, L-749A from Paris-Orly Airport, France to New York City, USA with a Stopover at Santa Maria Airport, Azores, Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Air Passenger Average Trip Lengths and Fare Levels in US Domestic Markets
    Institute of Transportation Studies University of California at Berkeley An Analysis of Air Passenger Average Trip Lengths and Fare Levels in US Domestic Markets Sheng-Chen Alex Huang WORKING PAPER UCB-ITS-WP-2000-1 Publications in the working paper series are issued for discussion and are not considered final reports. Comments are invited. February 2000 ISSN 0192 4141 Institute of Transportation Studies University of California at Berkeley An Analysis of Air Passenger Average Trip Lengths and Fare Levels in US Domestic Markets Sheng-Chen Alex Huang Working Paper UCB-ITS-WP-2000–1 NATIONAL CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR NEXTOR AVIATION OPERATIONS RESEARCH NEXTOR Working Paper WP-00-1 February 2000 ISSN 0192 4141 - ii - PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper analyzes the passenger trip length and fare patterns for each origin and destination market in the United States for the year of 1998. The U.S. Department of Transportation 10 percent origin and destination survey data for air passenger travel is used to evaluate the distribution of both passenger traffic and fares for different origin and destination distances. The author wishes to acknowledge the guidance and suggestions of Dr. Geoffrey Gosling at the University of California at Berkeley during the conduct of the research, as well as the support of Safire Aircraft Company in sponsoring the work. - iii - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS II TABLE OF CONTENTS III LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES IV 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. DATA SOURCES 2 Trip length of an origin-destination pair: 3 Market: 3 Fared passenger: 4 Average fare: 4 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Deadliest American Disasters and Large Loss
    DEADLIEST AMERICAN DISASTERS AND LARGE LOSS-OF-LIFE EVENTS A Catalog of, and Notes on, Natural and Man-Made Events Causing Ten or More Fatalities in America/The United States and its Territories Since 1492 Homepage: http://www.usdeadlyevents.com/ STATE Breakout Alphabetically Arranged (All States, the District of Columbia, and Territories) B. Wayne Blanchard, PhD Blue Ridge Summit, PA Copyright August 2017 Feb 18, 2018 Go to Homepage to access: Chronology of Events. Event Typology (e.g. aviation, epidemics, explosions, fires heat, mining, hurricanes, violence). Rank-Ordering within Types by State. Spreadsheet. 1 1. Alabama 167 Alphabetical Order 2. Alaska 87 3. Arizona 99 4. Arkansas 141 5. California 425 6. Colorado 110 7. Connecticut 82 8. Delaware 30 9. District of Columbia 25 10. Florida 194 11. Georgia 146 12. Hawaii 55 13. Idaho 28 14. Illinois 274 15. Indiana 150 16. Iowa 74 17. Kansas 70 18. Kentucky 117 19. Louisiana 247 20. Maine 54 21. Maryland 94 22. Massachusetts 354 23. Michigan 179 24. Minnesota 65 25. Mississippi 166 26. Missouri 196 27. Montana 38 28. Nebraska 51 29. Nevada 46 30. New Hampshire 42 31. New Jersey 205 32. New Mexico 64 33. New York 512 34. North Carolina 151 35. North Dakota 17 36. Ohio 228 37. Oklahoma 129 38. Oregon 81 39. Pennsylvania 420 Puerto Rico 19 40. Rhode Island 40 41. South Carolina 112 42. South Dakota 28 43. Tennessee 135 44. Texas 328 45. Utah 43 46. Vermont 31 47. Virginia 155 48. Washington 98 49. West Virginia 126 50. Wisconsin 88 51.
    [Show full text]