DOCSLIB.ORG

Book Reviews Jeffrey Herf, Undeclared Wars with Israel: East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Book Reviews Jeffrey Herf, Undeclared Wars with Israel: East Book Reviews Jeffrey Herf, Undeclared Wars With Israel: East Germany and the West German Far Left, 1967–1989. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 493 pp. $29.99. Reviewed by Jeffrey Kopstein, University of California, Irvine In a fitting sequel to his book Divided Memory: The Nazi Past and the Two Germanys (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), Jeffrey Herf provides a mountain of evidence documenting how the Communist regime in the German Democratic Re- public (GDR) and the extreme-left opposition in West Germany supported Palestinian Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-pdf/18/4/217/700114/jcws_r_00689.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 terrorists who murdered Jews both in Israel and in numerous other countries for more than two decades, from 1967 to 1989. If the 11th commandment of West German politics was to bolster the Jewish state or at least do no harm to Jews, the East German regime and the West German extreme left felt bound by no such strictures. The GDR provided weapons, training, medical care, vacation spots, and steady support in the United Nations (UN) for Israel’s enemies. The West German far left offered a steady drumbeat of propaganda about the evils of Zionism and occasionally backed up their rhetoric with violent acts against Jews. How did these Germans justify violence against Jews so soon after World War II? Herf points to a combination of Realpolitik and ideology. West Germany’s Hallstein Doctrine left East Germany isolated and desperate for diplomatic recognition. Once the Soviet Union threw its full weight behind the Arab side after 1967, the GDR (which alone among the Warsaw Pact states had never established diplomatic relations with Israel) became the most ardent backer of the radical rejectionist states: Syria, Iraq, Libya, and—until Anwar al-Sadat’s break with the USSR in 1972—Egypt. By consistently backing these states and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), including the most violent factions within the Palestinian movement, the East Germans ultimately succeeded in breaking the diplomatic blockade. The West German extreme left faced a different dilemma. Having formed within the student movement in Frankfurt and elsewhere, its problem was less political (since it had no real power) than moral and ideological. The question of violence against Jews could be justified only with astonishingly twisted dialectics. The far-left depicted Israel as an imperialist state, a product of colonialism and U.S. power, and argued that Germans had to get over their “Jewish complex” to support the oppressed Palestinians in their armed national liberation struggle against Israel (they remained silent on Zionism itself being a national liberation struggle). Jews, so the argument went, would ultimately benefit from this anti-Jewish violence (even if carried out against synagogues, Jewish old age homes, Jewish kindergartens, and Jewish communal institutions in Germany) because Zionism was bad for the Jews, just as it was bad for everyone. The logic was strained and some on Germany’s far left rejected it. But not everyone did, and the West German extremists plotted or participated in violence against Jews within Germany and as the lead hijackers at Entebbe, which involved coordination and planning with Uganda’s dictator Idi Amin, an ardent admirer of Adolf Hitler. The German hijackers even designed a small Selektion of their own a` la the Nazis and separated their hostages into Jewish and non-Jewish groups. 217 Book Reviews Ultimately, however, the West German far left’s bark was far worse than its bite; it did little damage to Israel and killed few Jews. Far more serious and deadly were the arms deliveries from the East German state. Secrecy remained paramount, but the East German regime’s fingerprints were everywhere. When the Israelis ultimately expelled the PLO from Lebanon in 1982 they uncovered a vast quantity of weapons and documents, most of which could be traced back to the Soviet bloc, above all to East Germany. Herf has mined numerous important archives and German-language materials to Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-pdf/18/4/217/700114/jcws_r_00689.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 show in clear detail the mendacity of the East German regime’s policy toward Israel. Not only did East German diplomats join the chorus at the UN condemning any Israeli response to terrorist attacks, not only did the regime publicly equate Zionism and Israel with Nazism (along with published newspaper cartoons that drew on traditional anti- Semitic tropes of Jewish grasping, greed, and hidden power), it also criticized the very use of the word “terrorism” to describe the dozens and dozens of bombings, shootings, and shellings deliberately targeting Israeli civilians in the decades after 1967. Behind closed doors, however, things were different. East German officials did not hesitate to use the word “terrorism” when talking with Arab diplomats or in internal State Security (Stasi) reports. They knew very well what they were doing. The GDR played a tricky game in supporting Arab terrorists, with the risk of angering the Western allies. Herf describes the East German doctrine regarding terrorism as “Eurocentric.” Killing civilian Jews in Israel or elsewhere in the developing world was praiseworthy “resistance.” In Europe, however, terrorism was forbidden. The Stasi insisted on this with their Palestinian clients. The U.S. government warned the Soviet authorities about security risks associated with opening a PLO embassy in East Berlin because it provided easy access to the West. The Stasi kept their Palestinians guests on a short leash. Oil wealth, however, afforded the Libyan government a degree of independence, and in 1986 agents from their embassy in East Berlin bombed a discotheque in West Berlin frequented by U.S. military personnel. The expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon in 1982 marked a huge defeat for the Soviet loc’s strategy, but East Germany and its Arab partners sustained their mutual admiration until the regime’s collapse. PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat and PLFP founder George Habash both worried about the political changes in the Soviet bloc and the loss of their most ardent friends in East Germany. They were right to be worried because one of the first acts of the post-Communist government in East Germany in 1990, before unification, was to apologize for having supported decades of violence and to renounce all treaties with its erstwhile Arab clients. Herf ’s book is a landmark of scholarship on this understudied and tragic episode of German-Jewish relations. Two elements of context would have strengthened the book: first, some deeper discussion of the Palestinian question and Arab reasoning and, second, a more extensive consideration of how East German policy fit into the more general Soviet attitude towards Jews and Zionism. Some of my favorite passages in the book are those that ponder the motivation of the East German regime and its leaders to act as they did. It is not a simple 218 Book Reviews question. Political expediency undoubtedly drove much of their actions, but it is hard to ignore the anti-Semitic stereotypes in some of the GDR’s public stances; and senior Communist officials were certainly more than willing to indulge the not very well concealed anti-Semitism of their Arab interlocutors. In any case, twenty years after the Holocaust how can we not use the word “anti-Semitic” to describe German leaders who promoted and taught the killing of Jewish civilians? Even more profound than the (ultimately failed) policy of trying to destroy Israel by supporting its enemies may be the impact of so many years of poisonous propaganda Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-pdf/18/4/217/700114/jcws_r_00689.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 on the minds of ordinary East Germans. It is here, in particular, that historians may wish to build on Herf ’s fine study of East German policy. What were the effects of decades of distortion and moral degeneracy on the population? Did it bother ordinary East Germans that their leaders supported a terrorist organization that killed relatives of the same people their grandparents had annihilated? Those interested in answering these questions will have to start with Herf ’s study. ✣✣✣ Stephen G. Craft, American Justice in Taiwan: The 1957 Riots and Cold War Foreign Policy. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 2016. 267 pp. $45.00. Reviewed by Hsiao-ting Lin, Stanford University One spring evening in 1957, in a small house outside Taipei, the wife of U.S. Army Master Sergeant Robert G. Reynolds screamed for her husband. Someone had peeped at her through a bathroom window while she was in the shower. Reynolds grabbed his pistol, rushed outside, and shot a Chinese man, Liu Ziran, who was in their garden. In keeping with bilateral agreements, a U.S. military court in Taipei tried Reynolds for manslaughter. On 23 May 1957 the court found the sergeant innocent, and a U.S. Air Force plane flew him and his wife to the Philippines the next day, provoking an uproar in the Taiwan press. Liu’s widow tearfully protested in front of the U.S. embassy in Taipei, and her woes were broadcast throughout the island. Hundreds of young demonstrators began gathering outside the U.S. embassy to protest the acquittal, and by midday the original crowd of 200 had swelled to 6,000. In mid-afternoon, rumors that Reynolds had departed Taiwan sparked riots that escalated into violent rampages against the embassy and the nearby U.S. Information Agency (USIA) facility. Order was not restored until the evening of 24 May, when 33,000 Nationalist troops were deployed. Two days later, President Chiang Kai-shek offered his personal apologies to the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich Max Schiller Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2012 Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich Max Schiller Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Schiller, Max, "Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich" (2012). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 358. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/358 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction The formation and subsequent actions of the Nazi government left a devastating and indelible impact on Europe and the world. In the midst of general technological and social progress that has occurred in Europe since the Enlightenment, the Nazis represent one of the greatest social regressions that has occurred in the modern world. Despite the development of a generally more humanitarian and socially progressive conditions in the western world over the past several hundred years, the Nazis instigated one of the most diabolic and genocidal programs known to man. And they did so using modern technologies in an expression of what historian Jeffrey Herf calls “reactionary modernism.” The idea, according to Herf is that, “Before and after the Nazi seizure of power, an important current within conservative and subsequently Nazi ideology was a reconciliation between the antimodernist, romantic, and irrantionalist ideas present in German nationalism and the most obvious manifestation of means ...modern technology.” 1 Nazi crimes were so extreme and barbaric precisely because they incorporated modern technologies into a process that violated modern ethical standards. Nazi crimes in the context of contemporary notions of ethics are almost inconceivable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failed Post-War Experiment: How Contemporary Scholars Address the Impact of Allied Denazification on Post-World War Ii Germany
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected Masters Essays Master's Theses and Essays 2019 THE FAILED POST-WAR EXPERIMENT: HOW CONTEMPORARY SCHOLARS ADDRESS THE IMPACT OF ALLIED DENAZIFICATION ON POST-WORLD WAR II GERMANY Alicia Mayer Follow this and additional works at: https://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays Part of the History Commons THE FAILED POST-WAR EXPERIMENT: HOW CONTEMPORARY SCHOLARS ADDRESS THE IMPACT OF ALLIED DENAZIFICATION ON POST-WORLD WAR II GERMANY An Essay Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts & Sciences of John Carroll University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Alicia Mayer 2020 As the tide changed during World War II in the European theater from favoring an Axis victory to an Allied one, the British, American, and Soviet governments created a plan to purge Germany of its Nazi ideology. Furthermore, the Allies agreed to reconstruct Germany so a regime like the Nazis could never come to power again. The Allied Powers met at three major summits at Teheran (November 28-December 1,1943), Yalta (February 4-11, 1945), and Potsdam (July 17-August 2, 1945) to discuss the occupation period and reconstruction of all aspects of German society. The policy of denazification was agreed upon by the Big Three, but due to their political differences, denazification took different forms in each occupation zone. Within all four Allied zones, there was a balancing act between denazification and the urgency to help a war-stricken population in Germany. This literature review focuses specifically on how scholars conceptualize the policy of denazification and its legacy on German society.
    [Show full text]
  • German Transitions in the French Occupation Zone, 1945
    Forgotten and Unfulfilled: German Transitions in the French Occupation Zone, 1945- 1949 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Guy B. Aldridge May 2015 © 2015 Guy B. Aldridge. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Forgotten and Unfulfilled: German Transitions in the French Occupation Zone, 1945- 1949 by GUY B. ALDRIDGE has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Mirna Zakic Assistant Professor of History Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract ALDRIDGE, GUY B., M.A., May 2015, History Forgotten and Unfulfilled: German Transitions in the French Occupation Zone, 1945- 1949 Director of Thesis: Mirna Zakic This thesis examines how local newspapers in the French Occupation Zone of Germany between 1945 and 1949 reflected social change. The words of the press show that, starting in 1945, the Christian narrative was the lens through which ‘average’ Germans conceived of their past and present, understanding the Nazi era as well as war guilt in religious terms. These local newspapers indicate that their respective communities made an early attempt to ‘come to terms with the past.’ This phenomenon is explained by the destruction of World War II, varying Allied approaches to German reconstruction, and unique social conditions in the French Zone. The decline of ardent religiosity in German society between 1945 and 1949 was due mostly to increasing Cold War tensions as well as the return of stability and normality.
    [Show full text]
  • Freya Von Moltke Passes Away in Norwich, Vermont, at Age 98
    the bulletin of the carolyn and leonard miller center for holocaust studies SPRING 2010 The Bulletin of the Carolyn and leonard Miller Center for holoCaust studies voluMe 14 the university of verMont spring 2010 Coming in Fall 2010 Lecture by Henry Rousso, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, France Lecture by Simone Schweber, University of Wisconsin-Madison The Raul Hilberg Memorial Lecture, to be delivered by Jeffrey Herf, University of Maryland at College Park Lecture by Aram Yengoyan, University of California, Davis Please check our website for Freya von Moltke Passes Away schedules and other details as in Norwich, Vermont, at Age 98 they become available: http://www.uvm.edu/~uvmchs One of the Last Survivors of the German Resistance to Hitler by Peter Hoffmann InsIde freye von moltke reya von Moltke was born the 1930s, the Moltkes lived in Berlin, on 29 March 1911 as the when Helmuth was in law practice faculty news F daughter of Carl Theodor there. The Moltkes never lived in student news Deichmann, a Cologne banker whose a grand way. Moltke father and son “child euthanasia” bank failed in the Great Depression regarded themselves as democrats, catholic church in Poland in 1931. She met Helmuth James Freya´s husband with his socialistic steven aschheim Count von Moltke, a law student, tendencies was the most radical one. 2009 hilberg lecture in 1929, and soon began the study In 1932, when the old President Paul criminals with doctorates of law at the universities in Cologne von Hindenburg – reluctantly – stood holocaust Geographies and Bonn; she received a doctorate for re-election, both Helmuth and Writing as freedom in law at Berlin University in 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • Undeclared Wars with Israel: East Germany and the West German Far Left, 1967-1989'
    H-Judaic Lenhard on Herf, 'Undeclared Wars with Israel: East Germany and the West German Far Left, 1967-1989' Review published on Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Jeffrey Herf. Undeclared Wars with Israel: East Germany and the West German Far Left, 1967-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Illustrations. 493 pp. $29.99 (paper), ISBN 978-1-107-46162-8; $99.99 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-107-08986-0. Reviewed by Philipp Lenhard (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Historisches Seminar Jüdische Geschichte und Kultur) Published on H-Judaic (November, 2017) Commissioned by Katja Vehlow Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=50839 When the German terrorists Wilfried Böse and Brigitte Kuhlmann hijacked Air France Flight 139 on June 27, 1976, and separated Jewish and Israeli from non-Jewish hostages, the Nazi past seemed to resurge in a new, left-radical disguise. Since 1969, German leftists had maintained close contacts with Palestinian terrorist groups, such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and Fatah, the two largest groups forming the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). As a result of this collaboration, a series of anti-Jewish attacks were carried out in West Germany throughout the 1970s in the name of a so-called resistance against US imperialism and Zionist racism. The hijacking of the Air France flight and the “selection” of the Jewish passengers represent the zenith of German left-wing anti-Zionism that declined in the 1980s and has been increasingly challenged by leftist supporters of Israel since the 1990s.[1] However, the fine line between criticism of Israeli politics, hatred against Israel, and antisemitism remains an urgent issue today.[2] Historical research takes on an important role in uncovering the history of anti-Zionism and antisemitism in their manifold forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology and Terror in Germany
    An Age of Murder: Ideology and Terror in Germany Jeffrey Herf It is best to begin with the obvious. This is a series of lectures about murder, indeed about an age of murder. Murders to be sure inspired by politi- cal ideas, but murders nevertheless. In all, the Rote Armee Fraktion (Red Army Faction, hereafter the RAF) murdered thirty-four people and would have killed more had police and intelligence agencies not arrested them or prevented them from carrying out additional “actions.” Yesterday, the papers reported that thirty-two people were killed in suicide-bomb attacks in Iraq, and thirty-four the day before, and neither of those war crimes were front-page news in the New York Times or the Washington Post. So there is an element of injustice in the amount of time and attention devoted to the thirty-four murders committed by the RAF over a period of twenty- two years and that devoted to the far more numerous victims of radical Islamist terror. Yet the fact that the murders of large numbers of people today has become horribly routine is no reason to dismiss the significance of the murders of a much smaller number for German history. Along with the murders came attempted murders, bank robberies, and explosions at a variety of West German and American institutions. The number of dead could have been much higher. If the RAF had not used pistols, machine guns, bazookas, rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), remote-controlled . This article was originally delivered as the opening lecture of the lecture series “The ‘German Autumn’ of 977: Terror, State, and Society in West Germany,” held at the German Historical Institute in Washington, DC, on Thursday, September 7, 007.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Propaganda for the Arab World'
    H-German Curp on Jeffrey Herf, 'Nazi Propaganda for the Arab World' Review published on Friday, November 18, 2011 Jeffrey Herf. Nazi Propaganda for the Arab World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. 252 pp. $30.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-300-14579-3. Reviewed by T. David Curp (Ohio University)Published on H-German (November, 2011) Commissioned by Benita Blessing Information and Propaganda Warfare in Nazi Propaganda in the Arab World The physical detritus of war is deadly. From the unexploded Anglo-American bombs that to this day still claim German lives to the depleted uranium munitions that litter the battlefields of the Middle East, the remains of the weapons designed for the wars of the twentieth century continue their work of physical destruction. Other remnants of the war cultures of twentieth-century European militarism and imperialism retain a more subtle lethality. At a time when various radical Islamists, including the current president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, call into question the universal condemnation of National Socialist Germany and the Shoah, while the Israeli foreign minister proposes population transfers/expulsions of his country's Palestinian Arab minority as a means of ensuring peace, Jeffrey Herf's study of the immediate and long-term impact of Nazi propaganda in the Arab world is a timely call for deeper historically grounded, international analysis of the impact of World War II on the Middle East. Based upon a wide range of English- and German-language archival resources, including American embassy translations of Nazi radio propaganda in Arabic, Nazi Propaganda for the Arab World examines the desperate Nazi efforts to propagate and weaponize their antisemitic visions and ideals in the Arab world, and the responses of both the Arabs and their Anglo-American hegemons to these efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • “Displacement, Abstraction and Historical Specificity: Comments on the Frankfurt School's Critical Theory” Jeffrey Herf De
    “Displacement, Abstraction and Historical Specificity: Comments on the Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory” Jeffrey Herf Department of History University of Maryland 2115 Francis Scott Key Hall College Park, MD 20742 Email: [email protected] For delivery at the Conference on “The Weimar Moment: Liberalism, Political Theology and Law,” Interdisciplinary Conference, Sponsored by the Law School, Department of History and the Lubar Institute for the Study of the Abrahamic Religions, of Wisconsin-Madison, October 24-26, 2008 Jeffrey Herf / 1 In this paper, I argue that a defining feature of the Frankfurt School’s critical theory of society was the displacement of proper nouns referring to particular times and places with abstractions that had no geographical and only vague temporal referents. I argue that though displacement and abstraction were a component of the Marxist tradition before World War I, the radical leftist, that is, Leninist response to the war was a key factor in its intensification. Georg Lukacs’ History and Class Consciousness was a more philosophically elaborated version of a displacement and abstraction presented in simpler in Lenin’s Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism and in the manifestos issued by the radical left (including Lenin) in the midst of World War I from its conferences in Kienthal and Zimmerwald. One defining feature of the radical left during the war, and in Germany during the Weimar Republic, was the view that nothing of significance had distinguished the competing sides in the Great War. As all were variations of capitalist imperialism which was held to be responsible for the slaughter of Verdun and ths Somme, the response of the radical left was to turn the war into the opportunity for revolution in all of the contending states.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Schlosser on Hitler
    A. N. Wilson. Hitler. New York: Basic Books, 2012. 215 pp. $24.99, cloth, ISBN 978-0-465-03128-3. Reviewed by Nicholas J. Schlosser Published on H-Empire (September, 2012) Commissioned by Charles V. Reed (Elizabeth City State University) Is there room in the already crowded feld of much that has not been written about before. In literature on the history of Nazi Germany for yet this brief, highly interpretive account of Hitler’s another biography of Adolf Hitler? With excellent life, Wilson asks questions that have been asked biographies already written on this subject by Ian before and examines sources that have been ex‐ Kershaw (Hitler 1889-1936: Hubris [1998] and amined before, and ultimately presents conclu‐ Hitler 1936-1945: Nemesis [2000]) and Alan Bul‐ sions that are highly conjectural, speculative, and lock (A Study in Tyranny [1962]), not to mention unsubstantiated by a careful reading of the avail‐ the vast corpus of works examining specific ele‐ able evidence and historical literature. ments of Hitler’s ideology, the Third Reich, and Much ink has already been spilled over this their place within the broader context of German work.[1] After its publication, British historian history, do we need yet another book on this par‐ Richard J. Evans wrote a critical review of it for ticular topic? New Statesman in which he pointed out numer‐ The answer, of course, is yes. There is always ous factual errors, criticized the work’s broad gen‐ room for new works on any historical topic, pro‐ eralities, and noted that the author made little ef‐ vided they bring something new to the table.
    [Show full text]
  • The “New World Order”: from Unilateralism to Cosmopolitanism
    1 Program for the Study of Germany and Europe Working Paper No. 04.1 The “New World Order”: From Unilateralism to Cosmopolitanism by Jeffrey Herf Jürgen Neyer Department of History Heisenberg Fellow of the Deutsche University of Maryland Forschungsgemeinschaft 2115 Francis Scott Key Hall Freie Universität Berlin College Park, Maryland 20742 Center for Transatlantic Foreign and O: 301 405 7667 or 301 405 4265 Security Policy Fax: 301 314 9399 Ihnestr. 21, 14195 Berlin, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +49-(0)30-838-55527 (Secy) Fax: +49-(0)30-838-54160 e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT On January 26, 2004, the topic of the CES-Berlin Dialogues was “The ‘New World Order’: From Unilateralism to Cosmopolitanism.” It was the second in a series of four meetings organized in Berlin under the heading “Redefining Justice.” The session was intended to examine successful and failed arenas of cooperation between the US and Europe; political misunderstandings and conscious manipulation; and models for future transatlantic relations. The presenters were Jeffrey Herf, Professor of History, University of Maryland, and Prof. Dr. Jürgen Neyer, Professor of International Political Economy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, and Heisenberg Fellow of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft at the Department of Political and Social Sciences of the Freie Universität Berlin. Jeffrey Herf was asked to speak on the basic tenets of U.S. foreign policy in the administration of President George W. Bush, and Jürgen Neyer focused on the European view of international relations and conduct in the period since the invasion of Iraq. For further information on the CES-Berlin Dialogues, please check our website www.fas.harvard.edu/~ces-ber/ 2 Jeffrey Herf It is a pleasure again to contribute to an event sponsored by the Center for European Studies, where I spent so many fine times in the 1980s at Harvard.
    [Show full text]
  • “Nazi Germany and the Arab and Muslim World: Old and New Scholarship”
    “Nazi Germany and the Arab and Muslim World: Old and New Scholarship” Jeffrey Herf Professor Department of History University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 Email: [email protected] Draft, not for quotation without permission. To be presented on June 6, 2008 at the Historical Society’s 2008 Conference on “Migration, Diaspora, Ethnicity, & Nationalism in History,” Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, Charles Commons Conference Center, “L” Level, 10 East 33rd Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, June 5-7, 2008 The Nazi regime’s efforts to gain adherents in the Arab and Muslim Middle East were brief but intense. My paper today is about those efforts. It is part of a sequel to The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust, my study that examined the core themes of the radical anti-Semitism produced by the Nazi regime. In working on that book and also observing, among radical Islamists, the peculiar re-emergence of radical anti-Semitic ideas whose origins lay in Europe, I decided to extend the comparative historical enterprise beyond its Eurocentric limit and to explore the similarities and differences between the Nazi regime’s radical anti-Semitism and that of the radical Islamism that emerged first in the 1930s and 1940s and which has subsequently came to play such an important role in recent history.1 In the immediate aftermath of World War II, in part stimulated by interest in the prominent role played by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el-Husseini, the Nazi regime’s efforts to spread its ideology to the Arab and Muslim world was the subject of interest at the successor war crimes trials in Nuremberg and in several books.2 It attracted relatively little interest in the subsequent decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Antisemitism to the Middle East: Nazi Propaganda During the Holocaust
    Jeffrey Herf Broadcasting Antisemitism to the Middle East: Nazi Propaganda during the Holocaust With the emergence of radical Islam in recent decades, the question of the rela- tionship between antisemitism in Europe, and hatred of the Jews in Muslim, Arab, and Persian societies has remained the subject of intense political discussion. To what extent can the Jew-hatred expressed by the radical Islamists of varying ideological hues in Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah and the government of Iran be explained by factors indigenous to these societies and cultures experiencing the pressures of attempted modernization? Or do they also have roots in antisemitic currents that came to the Middle East from twentieth-century Europe, especially during the era of fascism and Nazism.¹ Historians of modern Europe have exhaus- tively documented and analyzed the European impact on Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia in the era of colonialism. Until recently, however, the impact of Nazism and fascism outside Europe was less examined. In recent years, in part under the impact of contemporary events, this relative disinterest has given way to a flurry of scholarly interest in Nazi Germany’s efforts to spread its ideology and policies in the Arab, Persian, and Muslim countries. As a result of recent research, we have a better understanding of a meeting of hearts and minds, not a clash of civilizations, that took place in wartime Berlin between pro- Nazi Arab exiles, on the one hand, and Nazi leaders, on the other. The result of that conjuncture was the production of thousands of hours of Arabic radio broad- casts and hundreds of thousands of Arabic leaflets and pamphlets that trans- lated and diffused Nazism’s radical antisemitism into an easily understandable political discourse adapted to the political realities of local circumstances in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]