Unbound: a Literary Series with BAM and Greenlight Bookstore Returns with Jonathan Lethem (Sep 10) and Richard Dawkins (Sep 23)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Richard Dawkins • Daniel Dennett • Christopher Hitchins
Impact Hour January 10, 2016 Why People Don’t Believe: 1. The Power of Religion 2. Reason To Fear 3. Religion and Violence: A Closer Look 4. Is Christianity Irrational and Devoid of Evidence? 5. Is Christianity Anti-Scientific? 6. Is Biblical Morality Appalling? 7. Living the Way Jesus Calls Us to Live 8. Christianity’s Gifts to the World 9. Is There a Way Forward? True Religion Two Areas of Need: • The need for people of faith to hear and truly understand the concerns and challenges raised against religion • The need to engage in thoughtful and frank dialogue with those who raise such objections Three Aims of The Book: • Accurately represent the concerns and challenges raised against religious faith, particularly those against Christianity • Respond to those challenges • Examine the many god and humane contributions Christianity has made to the world throughout the past two thousand years A “biblical worldview”: • absolute moral truth exists; • the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches; • Satan is considered to be a real being or force, not merely symbolic; • a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by trying to be good or doing good works; • Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; • and God is the all-knowing, all-powerful creator of the world who still rules the universe today. The New Naysayers, Newsweek, September 11, 2006 “New Critics of Religion” http://www.newsweek.com/new-naysayers-109697 • Sam Harris • Richard Dawkins • Daniel Dennett • Christopher Hitchins “New Critics of Religion” Sam Harris “New -
The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins Is Another
BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT ooks about science tend to fall into two categories: those that explain it to lay people in the hope of cultivat- Bing a wide readership, and those that try to persuade fellow scientists to support a new theory, usually with equations. Books that achieve both — changing science and reach- ing the public — are rare. Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859) was one. The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins is another. From the moment of its publication 40 years ago, it has been a sparkling best-seller and a TERRY SMITH/THE LIFE IMAGES COLLECTION/GETTY SMITH/THE LIFE IMAGES TERRY scientific game-changer. The gene-centred view of evolution that Dawkins championed and crystallized is now central both to evolutionary theoriz- ing and to lay commentaries on natural history such as wildlife documentaries. A bird or a bee risks its life and health to bring its offspring into the world not to help itself, and certainly not to help its species — the prevailing, lazy thinking of the 1960s, even among luminaries of evolution such as Julian Huxley and Konrad Lorenz — but (uncon- sciously) so that its genes go on. Genes that cause birds and bees to breed survive at the expense of other genes. No other explana- tion makes sense, although some insist that there are other ways to tell the story (see K. Laland et al. Nature 514, 161–164; 2014). What stood out was Dawkins’s radical insistence that the digital information in a gene is effectively immortal and must be the primary unit of selection. -
Complete Dissertation
VU Research Portal Miracles in the age of science Bersee, A.N.J.M. 2020 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Bersee, A. N. J. M. (2020). Miracles in the age of science: A philosophical analysis and evaluation of arguments used in the debate between science and Western theology. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT Miracles in the age of science: A philosophical analysis and evaluation of arguments used in the debate between science and Western theology ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor of Philosophy aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr. V. Subramaniam, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van de promotiecommissie van de Faculteit Religie en Theologie op woensdag 25 maart 2020 om 13.45 uur in de aula van de universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105 door Anthonius Nicolaas Johannes Maria Bersee geboren te Bloemendaal promotoren: prof.dr. -
Suggested Titles: April, 2014
Suggested Titles: April, 2014 For Library Collection Development (arranged alphabetically by subject) 1 Suggested Titles List April, 2014 Table of Contents Accounting .............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Art ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Biology ................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Business Administration ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 Child Study ............................................................................................................................................................................ 31 Computer Information Science & Mathematics ................................................................................................................... 41 Criminal Justice ..................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Economics ............................................................................................................................................................................ -
The Interviews
Jeff Schechtman Interviews December 1995 to April 2017 2017 Marcus du Soutay 4/10/17 Mark Zupan Inside Job: How Government Insiders Subvert the Public Interest 4/6/17 Johnathan Letham More Alive and Less Lonely: On Books and Writers 4/6/17 Ali Almossawi Bad Choices: How Algorithms Can Help You Think Smarter and Live Happier 4/5/17 Steven Vladick Prof. of Law at UT Austin 3/31/17 Nick Middleton An Atals of Countries that Don’t Exist 3/30/16 Hope Jahren Lab Girl 3/28/17 Mary Otto Theeth: The Story of Beauty, Inequality and the Struggle for Oral Health 3/28/17 Lawrence Weschler Waves Passing in the Night: Walter Murch in the Land of the Astrophysicists 3/28/17 Mark Olshaker Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs 3/24/17 Geoffrey Stone Sex and Constitution 3/24/17 Bill Hayes Insomniac City: New York, Oliver and Me 3/21/17 Basharat Peer A Question of Order: India, Turkey and the Return of the Strongmen 3/21/17 Cass Sunstein #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media 3/17/17 Glenn Frankel High Noon: The Hollywood Blacklist and the Making of an American Classic 3/15/17 Sloman & Fernbach The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Think Alone 3/15/17 Subir Chowdhury The Difference: When Good Enough Isn’t Enough 3/14/17 Peter Moskowitz How To Kill A City: Gentrification, Inequality and the Fight for the Neighborhood 3/14/17 Bruce Cannon Gibney A Generation of Sociopaths: How the Baby Boomers Betrayed America 3/10/17 Pam Jenoff The Orphan's Tale: A Novel 3/10/17 L.A. -
Henry Thoreau, Ralph Ellison, and Jonathan Lethem
American (De)solitudes: Henry Thoreau, Ralph Elison, and Jonathan Lethem Jack Horton A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in English Department of English Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © Jack Horton, Ottawa, Canada, 2019 $ii Acknowledgements iv List of abbreviations vi Abstract vii Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Threshold 35 Chatper 2: Praxis 82 Chapter 3: Dispossession 128 Chapter 4: Parabola 191 Chapter 5: de/solitude 261 Conclusion 320 Works Cited 336 $iii The prison system must be dismantled and never rebuilt. $iv Acknowledgements The list of people who supported me, who helped me reach this end, and who asked nothing in return is too long to contain on these bare pages. The group of people formative in the development of this thesis are done an injustice if all we have to offer them is a mention on a page. In no way does being on this list oblige you to read this thesis. In no way does not being on this list mean you were not important to me. Here’s somewhat of a list, in alphabetical order. To: Alec Shaw, who made me a better person; your support was endless, as was your friendship. Alex Roodman, who can go ahead and put this work in read-only mode. Amir Nazempour, who is far away but never lost in translation. Ariel Airey-Lee, who—OK, thank. Brady Steeper, who has been my best friend for over a decade. [Dr.] Craig Gordon, who deserved so very much better than this. Dan Baker, who always, always asked. -
Emily S. Fine
Running head: THE DRIVE TO WRITE The Drive to Write: Inside the Writing Lives of Five Fiction Authors by Emily S. Fine B.A., Oberlin College, 2004 M.S., Antioch University New England, 2011 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Psychology in the Department of Clinical Psychology at Antioch University New England, 2015 Keene, New Hampshire THE DRIVE TO WRITE ii Department of Clinical Psychology DISSERTATION COMMITTEE PAGE The undersigned have examined the dissertation entitled: THE DRIVE TO WRITE: INSIDE THE WRITING LIVES OF FIVE FICTION AUTHORS presented on December 10, 2015 by Emily S. Fine Candidate for the degree of Doctor of Psychology and hereby certify that it is accepted*. Dissertation Committee Chairperson: Theodore Ellenhorn, PhD Dissertation Committee members: Barbara Belcher-Timme, PsyD Daniel Greif, PsyD Accepted by the Department of Clinical Psychology Chairperson George Tremblay, PhD on 12/10/15 * Signatures are on file with the Registrar’s Office at Antioch University New England. THE DRIVE TO WRITE iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I am exceedingly grateful to the authors who participated in this study for offering me a glimpse into their writing processes and inner lives. Thank you to Richard Russo, Christopher Paolini, Tova Mirvis, Jonathan Lethem, and Mary Doria Russell. Your authenticity, openness, and insight inspired and sustained me. Thank you to my advisor, Ted Ellenhorn, and my committee, Barbara Belcher-Timme and Daniel Greif, for patiently awaiting the final product. You encouraged but didn’t pressure me, which is exactly what I needed at this phase in my life and academic career. -
Jonathan Lethem
Jonathan Lethem Jonathan Allen Lethem wurde 1964 in Brooklyn, New York, geboren. Der Autor zahlreicher Romane, Essays und Kurzgeschichten entwickelte schon in jungen Jahren ein Interesse an Literatur. Vor allem das Lesen von Science Fiction prägte ihn dauerhaft. Nach Abbruch eines Kunststudiums in Vermont zog er 1984 nach Kalifornien, wo er sich mit Jobs in Buchläden über Wasser hielt. Sein erster Roman, Gun, with Occasional Music, wurde 1994 veröffentlicht. Der Verkauf der Verfilmungsrechte des Romans ermöglichte Lethem, seine Arbeit in den Buchläden aufzugeben und sich ganz dem Schreiben zu widmen. In den 1990er Jahren veröffentlichte er weitere Romane sowie einen Band mit Kurzgeschichten. 1996 zog Lethem zurück in seine Heimatstadt Brooklyn. 1999 veröffentlichte er mit Motherless Brooklyn einen Roman, der zum Bestseller avancierte, zahlreiche Preise erhielt und Lethem zum Durchbruch bei der Kritik verhalf. 2009 folgte mit Chronic City ein weiterer Stadtroman, den die New York Times auf die Liste der zehn besten Werke des Jahres stellte. Derzeit lebt Lethem mit seiner Familie in Brooklyn und Berwick, Maine. Seit 2011 unterrichtet er als Nachfolger von David Foster Wallace Kreatives Schreiben am Pomona College in Kalifornien. Lethems Werke- Auswahl: Englische Ausgaben Lethems Werke- Auswahl: Deutsche Ausgaben Gun, with Occasional Music (1994) Knarre mit Begleitmusik (1998) Amnesia Moon (1995) Der kurze Schlaf (1995) Motherless Brooklyn (1999) Motherless Brooklyn (1999) The Fortress of Solitude (2003) Die Festung der Einsamkeit (2003) You Don't Love Me Yet (2007) Du liebst mich, du liebst mich nicht (2007) Chronic City (2009) Chronic City (2011) Reaktionen auf Jonathan Lethems Werke / Chronic City “Dieser witzige, scharfe, schillernde Roman ist .. -
2017 : What Scientific Term Or Concept Ought to Be More
Copyright © 2017 By Edge Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved. To arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves. https://www.edge.org/responses/what-scientific-term-or%C2%A0concept-ought-to-be-more-widely-known Printed On Thu January 5th 2017 2017 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC TERM OR CONCEPT OUGHT TO BE MORE WIDELY KNOWN? Contributors [ 206 ] | View All Responses [ 206 ] 2017 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC TERM OR CONCEPT OUGHT TO BE MORE WIDELY KNOWN? Richard Dawkins Evolutionary Biologist; Emeritus Professor of the Public Understanding of Science, Oxford; Co-Author, with Yan Wong, The Ancestor’s Tale (Second Edition); Author, The Selfish Gene; The God Delusion; An Appetite For Wonder The Genetic Book of the Dead Natural Selection equips every living creature with the genes that enabled its ancestors—a literally unbroken line of them—to survive in their environments. To the extent that present environments resemble those of the ancestors, to that extent is a modern animal well equipped to survive and pass on the same genes. The ‘adaptations’ of an animal, its anatomical details, instincts and internal biochemistry, are a series of keys that exquisitely fit the locks that constituted its ancestral environments. Given a key, you can reconstruct the lock that it fits. Given an animal, you should be able to reconstruct the environments in which its ancestors survived. A knowledgeable zoologist, handed a previously unknown animal, can reconstruct some of the locks that its keys are equipped to open. -
Brief Candle in the Dark: My Life in Science
Twin Research and Human Genetics Volume 19 Number 2 p. 166 C The Author(s) 2016 BOOK REVIEW Brief Candle in the Dark: My Life in Science Richard Dawkins (2015), Bantam Press (Transworld Publishers) ISBN 9780593072561 Reviewed by Dorret I. Boomsma, Department of Biological Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands doi:10.1017/thg.2016.10 Richard Dawkins continues his two-part autobiography (page 406). The Extended Phenotype also explored the idea with Brief Candle in the Dark,subtitledasMy Life in Science. that the phenotype does not stop ‘at the body wall’, an idea In the first part of his memoirs, An Appetite for Wonder, now taking root in behavior genetics where studies more Dawkins chronicled the first 35 years of his life from his and more focus on the heritability and the influence of the childhood in Africa up till the publication of The Selfish genome on phenotypes that were traditionally labeled as en- Gene, the first of the 12 books that he has published so far. vironment, including print exposure, social environment, In this second installment of his memoirs there is much and the amount of time people spend on exercise or playing to enjoy, from reminiscences about the art of teaching, tu- the violin. toring students (under the Oxford system), to how to best Whereas the first volume of Dawkins’s autobiography grade papers and interview Oxford applicants, and going to focused in a more traditional way on his ancestors, family conferences. There is an entire chapter on attending con- history, childhood, and school days in Africa and England, ferences, entitled ‘The Delegate’s Tale,’ which begins with a with only the latter chapters discussing his scientific work quote from David Lodge’s novel Small World:‘Themodern in mathematical modeling of evolution, this second vol- conference resembles the pilgrimage of medieval Christen- ume is more targeted at science and his life in science. -
Why Accept the Pythagorean Theorem?
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Effective Evangelism: JAE393 WHY ACCEPT THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM? by Paul A. Nelson This article first appeared in the Effective Evangelism column of the CHRISTIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, volume 39, number 03 (2016). For further information or to subscribe to the CHRISTIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, go to: http://www.equip.org/christian-research-journal/. Suppose I said that you knew the Pythagorean theorem (A2 + B2 = C2) because you were educated in the United States, where students routinely study geometry. “You’re right, Paul,” you would probably reply, wondering if we could perhaps find something more interesting to discuss. But then I add that because you had to learn the Pythagorean theorem, you have no good reason to believe the theorem is true. You were taught it as a matter of standard educational practice, leaving you no choice but to memorize it. Anything soaked up from one’s culture in that fashion, however, should be doubted. Now you’re puzzled. The Pythagorean theorem follows deductively from the axioms of Euclidean geometry, you point out, but how or when one learns those axioms is irrelevant to the truth of the theorems derived from them. A2 + B2 = C2 is true as a proposition of geometry, whether one memorized it in a math classroom, or proved it thousands of years earlier on a sunny afternoon in ancient Alexandria. Logicians have a name for your argument, you tell me. They call it the genetic fallacy. Such arguments are fallacious because they confuse the causal origin of one’s beliefs (their genesis) with the entirely independent question of whether those beliefs are true. -
Journal of Stevenson Studies Volume 8
Journal of Stevenson Studies Volume 8 Stevenson8.indb 1 01/10/2011 16:04 ii Journal of Stevenson Studies Stevenson8.indb 2 01/10/2011 16:04 Journal of Stevenson Studies iii Editors Professor Linda Dryden Professor Emeritus Centre for Literature and Roderick Watson Writing English Studies School of Arts and Creative University of Stirling Industries Stirling Napier University FK9 4LA Craighouse Scotland Edinburgh Tel: 01786 467500 EH10 5LG Email: [email protected] Scotland Tel: 0131 455 6128 Email: [email protected] Contributions to volume 10 are warmly invited and should be sent to either of the editors listed above. The text should be submitted in MS WORD files in MHRA format. All contributions are subject to review by members of the Editorial Board. Published by The Centre for Scottish Studies University of Stirling © The contributors 2011 ISSN: 1744-3857 Printed and bound in the UK by Antony Rowe Ltd. Chippenhan, Wiltshire. Stevenson8.indb 3 01/10/2011 16:04 iv Journal of Stevenson Studies Editorial Board Professor Richard Ambrosini Professor Gordon Hirsch Universita’ di Roma Tre Department of English Rome University of Minnesota Professor Stephen Arata Professor Katherine Linehan School of English Department of English University of Virginia Oberlin College Dr Hilary Beattie Ohio Department of Psychiatry Professor Barry Menikoff Columbia University Department of English Professor Oliver Buckton University of Hawaii at School of English Manoa Florida Atlantic University Professor Glenda Norquay Dr Jenni Calder Department of