DOCSLIB.ORG

A Wesleyan Open Inclusivist Approach to Religious Diversity and New Atheism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Wesleyan Open Inclusivist Approach to Religious Diversity and New Atheism Durham E-Theses A Wesleyan Open Inclusivist Approach to Religious Diversity and New Atheism DEVAN, BENJAMIN,BRADFORD How to cite: DEVAN, BENJAMIN,BRADFORD (2016) A Wesleyan Open Inclusivist Approach to Religious Diversity and New Atheism, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11464/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 A WESLEYAN OPEN INCLUSIVIST APPROACH TO RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY AND NEW ATHEISM By: Benjamin Bradford DeVan Abstract Probing the “New Atheism” reveals not an isolated phenomenon, but a contemporary expression of a longer tradition of atheist advocacy and antagonism toward religion, beliefs about the Divine, and associated practices. Although not all critics of religion are atheists, and atheists display diversity among themselves, A Wesleyan Open Inclusivist Approach to Religious Diversity and New Atheism argues that New Atheists are sufficiently similar to religious people to be fruitfully approached utilizing conceptual tools that pertain to religious diversity, interaction, and dialogue. Specifically, it proposes that an optimistic Open Inclusivist attitude from the philosophy of religion, grounded by and employing methodological, biblical, historical, and ethical resources supplied and integrated by the Wesleyan tradition, is productive for approaching religious diversity issues that incorporate atheism and New Atheists. A Wesleyan variety of Open Inclusivism lessens or eliminates difficulties that competing paradigms from philosophy of religion exhibit, and eschews complications implicit or explicit to select Reformed, Catholic, and Universalist theologies. It coherently urges genuinely significant, reciprocal learning among religious believers and atheists and a hopeful urgency about salvation. Insisting that every person possesses sacred worth or inherent dignity, it undergirds ir/religious liberty and constructive attempts to persuade. It prods collaboration around common priorities, empowers prudent opposition where necessary, and operates in what John Wesley called the more excellent way of love. As one exemplar of ecumenical, Creedal, and evangelical Christianity; A Wesleyan Open Inclusivist Approach to Religious Diversity and New Atheism aims to interpret the Bible faithfully and to critically utilize historical precedents, reason, logic, and the sciences listening to existential and practical experience. Honoring each voice in conference, it effectively mediates ongoing dialogue on topics vital to atheism and religion, including the relationships of religion and science, problems of evil and suffering, and optimal ethical flourishing for physical as well as spiritual realities. A Wesleyan Open Inclusivist Approach to Religious Diversity and New Atheism By: Benjamin Bradford DeVan Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Durham Department of Theology and Religion 2015 ii Table of Contents Abstract i Table of Contents iii Statement of Copyright vi Acknowledgements vii Dedication ix Introduction 1 1. The First Decade of “New Atheists” and their Critics 4 1.1. Beginnings 4 1.1.1 Sam Harris 4 1.1.2 Daniel Dennett 6 1.1.3 Richard Dawkins 7 1.1.4 Christopher Hitchens 9 1.1.5 Other Riders with the “Four Horsemen” 11 1.1.6 Interlocutors and Critics 17 1.2 Preliminary Analysis 23 1.2.1 Antecedents and Trajectories 24 1.2.2 Gaps in the Literature 31 2. Approaching Religious Diversity and New Atheism 36 2.1 Is Atheism akin to a “Religious” Position? Can Atheists Be Religious? 36 2.1.1 Sample Wesleyans on Atheism and (other) Religions 36 2.1.2 Is Religion Definable? 38 2.1.3 Is (New) Atheism Religion? 39 2.2 Three Distinct, Yet Mutually Influencing Inter-religious Concerns 45 2.3 The Exclusivist-Inclusivist-Pluralist Continuum and Its Variants 49 2.3.1 Exclusivism, Restrictivism, Ecclesiocentrism, and Particularism 50 2.3.2 Pluralism, Universalism, Relativism, and Religious Antipathy 56 2.3.3 Inclusivists and their Conceptual Kin 62 3. “Honoring Conference”: Wesleyan Foundations for Engagement and Dialogue 71 3.1 What Constitutes Wesleyan Theology? 71 3.2 Locating the Present Thesis 73 iii 3.3 Quadrilateral or Honoring Conference? 76 3.4 Conferring with the Bible, the Holy Spirit, and Hermeneutical Helps 77 3.5 Conferring with the Community of Saints 79 3.6 Conferring with Reason and Logic 81 3.7 Conferring with Personal and Corporate Experience 83 3.8 Conferring with the “Book of Nature” (the Sciences) 85 3.9 Conferring with the “Analogy” of Faith (Apostle’s Creed) 87 3.10 God’s Universal Holy Love and Pardoning Transforming Grace 89 3.11 Conferring Together 90 3.12 Speaking Ecumenically, Evangelically, and Holistically 91 4. The Bible: Wesleyan Inclusivist Pillars, Part 1 94 4.1 Open Inclusivist Themes in Hebrew and Christian Scripture 95 4.1.1 Gentile Exemplars in the Hebrew Bible and 95 Pre-Christians in the Gospels and Acts 4.1.2 God’s Care for the Nations 101 4.1.3 False Religion, Hypocrisy, and Idolatry 107 4.2 Dissenting Readings 110 4.2.1 Of Melchizedek, Abimelech, and Jethro 107 4.2.2 Of Pertinent New Testament Passages 112 4.3 Are Inclusivist Readings of the Bible Relevant to New Atheists? 115 4.3.1 Hearing the Hebrew Bible 115 4.3.2 Considering the New Testament 120 5. History, Reason, and other Honoring Conference Voices: 124 Wesleyan Inclusivist Pillars, Part 2 5.1 Proto-Inclusivist Themes in Christian Tradition 124 5.1.1 Truth Inclusivism 126 5.1.2 Hope for Salvation 133 5.2 Listening to Reason and other Honoring Conference Voices 147 5.2.1 The Apostle’s Creed 147 5.2.2 Science and Experience 149 5.2.3 Come, Let Us Reason Together 153 iv 6. Applying Wesleyan Reflection to Interaction and Relationships 159 6.1 New Atheists Possess “Sacred Worth” 159 6.2 Ir/Religious Liberty 162 6.3 A Bustling Marketplace of Ideas 166 6.4 Reciprocal Critique 170 6.5 Collaborating in Shared Concerns 174 6.6 Disciplined Opposition 177 6.7 The More (or Most) Excellent Way of Love 180 7. Dialogue Hard? With New Atheists at the “Religious Roundtable” 186 7.1 Dialoguing about “Science and Religion” 186 7.1.1 Wesleyan Open Inclusivist Attitudinal Advantages 187 7.1.2 “Science and Religion: Are They Compatible?” 192 Issues in Discussion and Debate 7.2 The “Problem of Evil” and Suffering 196 7.2.1 The “No God” Solution 197 7.2.2 Is God Helpless, Absent, Evil, Amoral, Semi-benevolent, 199 Ignorant, and/or Foolish? 7.2.3 Suffering as Punishment, Karma, or Divine Judgment 203 7.2.4 Adversity as a Transforming Means of Grace 204 7.2.5 Free Will 206 7.2.6 Meta-Defenses / Meta-Theodicies 209 7.3 Considering Life after Death 211 7.3.1 Qualified Concord 213 7.3.2 Temporal and Enduring Joy 214 7.3.3 Hell? 215 7.3.4 The Resurrection of the Body and the Life Everlasting 218 7.4 Ethics and Eternity 224 7.4.1 Once More to Attitudinal and Operational Advantages 225 7.4.2 Proleptic Epektasis 228 Conclusion 234 Bibliography 238 v Statement of Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the author's prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. vi Acknowledgements Although it is impossible to properly acknowledge everyone who has contributed to my doctoral study, I extend special gratitude to the following. First, to my wife Kartini who persevered through joy, prayer, and sometimes intense struggle in what seemed to be my endless research, writing, and revision. I am eternally thankful for her love. I am grateful to my supervisors David A. Wilkinson and Robert J. Song for their detailed critique, wisdom, and rapport, especially in the final year as we labored through substantial rewrites to bring this thesis to its final form. I am a better scholar because of them. Thanks also to Durham University and the Department of Theology and Religion for their flexibility in supporting my inter-institutional initiatives, to Christopher J. Insole for chairing my examination (Viva Voce), to my internal examiner Mike Higton and external examiner Randy L. Maddox for their graciously incisive feedback and critique. While I was a visiting doctoral student at Duke University, Randy L. Maddox as one of my instructors directed me to multiple resources, and Laceye Warner commented on the first draft of what is now chapter 6. Miriam Cooke, Charles Kurzman, and Bruce Lawrence graciously included me in their Duke / UNC-Chapel Hill Middle East Studies seminar. Other staff and students whose friendship, conversation, or assistance I appreciate include Jonathan Anderson, Abdullah Antepli, Jeff Coles, William English, W. Stephen Gunter, Jennifer Hawk, Nathan Hays, Morgan Hendrix, Andy Keck, Mike Lehman, Brooks Lindsey, Todd Maberry, Justin Noia, Steven Porter, McKennon Shea, William Turner, Sam Wells, Phil White, Joyce Wu, and in particular Steve Hinkle. Paul Chaffee, Courtney Choi, John and Aysegul Frame, Ari Gordon, Steve Hayner, Michael S. Jones, Todd Ream, Thomas Thangaraj, Jerry L. Walls, Tout Wang, and Ben Witherington were also among those who were encouraging to me at various stages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Being and Time-Less Faith: Juxtaposing Heideggerian Anxiety and Religious Experience
    Open Theology 2020; 6: 15–26 Phenomenology of Religious Experience IV: Religious Experience and Description Jonathan Lyonhart* Being and Time-less Faith: Juxtaposing Heideggerian Anxiety and Religious Experience https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0003 Received October 12, 2019; accepted December 19, 2019 Abstract: In Heidegger, fear reveals the thing to be feared in a fuller way than theory can. However, anxiety is distinct from fear, for while fear is directed towards a specific thing within the world, anxiety is anxious about existence itself, disclosing the totality of Being. A similar method could be applied to faith. Arguably, faith is a mood; a feeling of trust in the divine that can be phenomenologically consistent and overwhelming. However, faith is not necessarily directed towards a specific object within the world. One cannot point and say: “God is right there!” Indeed, attempts to do so through miracles, teleology or dialectics have been roundly critiqued by the Western tradition. But then what is this mood of faith disclosing if not something within the world? Perhaps, like anxiety, faith is not revealing an object within the world, but the world as a totality. Since God—at least the God central to much of the Judeo-Christian tradition—is not a being but Being itself (or in some formulations is actually ‘beyond being’), God therefore cannot be disclosed in the world as an object but has to be disclosed as that which is transcendently beyond it. Such a conclusion does not simply flee the realm of the everyday, but derives from, and legitimates, basic descriptions of religious experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Point of Departure of Fundamental Theology
    Teresianum 45 (1994/2) 439-455 THE POINT OF DEPARTURE OF FUNDAMENTAL THEOLOGY EDWIN DINIZ The course of fundamental theology is still subject to morphological changes and the various endeavours in the course of the history of theology show, that this course still re­ mains to be defined, if it is to be defined at all. Attempts have been made in this brief reflection to give a short historical glimpse on the subject and then to decipher its identity in the context of theological studies. Finally, without entering the field of the scope or aim of fundamental theology, attention has been concentrated on the point of de­ parture in the study of fundamental theology. Historical Glimpse The expression «fundamental theology» can lead one to think in different directions1 with various meanings, but it has certainly nothing to do with «fundamentalism».2 The fun­ damental theology is engaged in giving a justification for the faith in front of human reason and in the course of the his- 1 There are sufficient indications of literature in this field, given by M a x S e c k l e r , Fundamentaltheologie: Aufgaben und Aufbau, Begriff und Na­ men. in «Handbuch der Fundamentaltheologie» Bd. IV, pg. 513-514. See al­ so Pie’ i N i n o t , Tratado de Teologia Fundamental. ‘Dar razon de la esperanza’ (I. Pe. 3, 13), Salamanca, 1989, pg. 26-54.. 2 Regarding this argument of «fundamentalism» Cfr. K l a u s K ie n z l e r , Der neue Fundamentalismus, Duesseldorf, 1 9 9 0 ; W o l f g a n g R e i n e r t , Katholi­ scher Fundamentalismus, Regensburg, 1 9 9 1 ; C h r is t ia n J a e g g i and D a v id J .
    [Show full text]
  • A Parenting Primer for Humanistic Jews
    HUMANISTIC JUDAISM Volume XXXX Number 4 / Volume XXXXI Number 1-2 Autumn 2012 / Winter - Spring 2013 A PARENTING PRIMER FOR HUMANISTIC JEWS Jerald Bain Rabbi Binyamin Biber Stephanie Blum Rabbi Adam Chalom Rabbi Daniel Friedman Dale McGowan Joy Markowitz Jennifer Naparstek Klein Baudelia Taylor Wisdom from Wine: Demystifying Family Values The Atheist Rabbi and the Orthodox Women’s Seminary and more Humanistic Judaism is a voice for Jews who value their Jewish identity and who seek an alternative to conventional Judaism. Humanistic Judaism affirms the right of individuals to shape their own lives independent Humanistic Judaism is published quarterly by the of supernatural authority. Society for Humanistic Judaism, a non-profit orga- nization, 28611 West Twelve Mile Road, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48334, (248) 478-7610, Fax (248) 478-3159, [email protected], www.shj.org. This is a combined issue: Vol. XXXX, No. 4 / Vol. XXXXI Number 1 - 2, Autumn 2012 / Winter - Spring 2013. Signed articles do not necessarily represent the viewpoints or policies of the Society for Humanistic Judaism. All material © Copyright 2013 by the Society for Humanistic Judaism. No portion of this work may be reprinted or copied without written permission of the publisher. Subscription Rates: $21.00 per year. Canadian Subscriptions $31.00. Overseas Subscriptions $43.00 per year (U.S. Dollars). No refunds. Sample copies available at single issue price plus postage. Addi- tional copies of a single issue are available from the Society for Humanistic Judaism at the cover price plus postage. Address all inquiries and subscriptions to Humanistic Judaism, 28611 West Twelve Mile Road, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48334.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Dawkins • Daniel Dennett • Christopher Hitchins
    Impact Hour January 10, 2016 Why People Don’t Believe: 1. The Power of Religion 2. Reason To Fear 3. Religion and Violence: A Closer Look 4. Is Christianity Irrational and Devoid of Evidence? 5. Is Christianity Anti-Scientific? 6. Is Biblical Morality Appalling? 7. Living the Way Jesus Calls Us to Live 8. Christianity’s Gifts to the World 9. Is There a Way Forward? True Religion Two Areas of Need: • The need for people of faith to hear and truly understand the concerns and challenges raised against religion • The need to engage in thoughtful and frank dialogue with those who raise such objections Three Aims of The Book: • Accurately represent the concerns and challenges raised against religious faith, particularly those against Christianity • Respond to those challenges • Examine the many god and humane contributions Christianity has made to the world throughout the past two thousand years A “biblical worldview”: • absolute moral truth exists; • the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches; • Satan is considered to be a real being or force, not merely symbolic; • a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by trying to be good or doing good works; • Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; • and God is the all-knowing, all-powerful creator of the world who still rules the universe today. The New Naysayers, Newsweek, September 11, 2006 “New Critics of Religion” http://www.newsweek.com/new-naysayers-109697 • Sam Harris • Richard Dawkins • Daniel Dennett • Christopher Hitchins “New Critics of Religion” Sam Harris “New
    [Show full text]
  • Marquette History of Theology
    MARQUETTE HISTORY OF THEOLOGY VOLUME II: LATE MEDIEVAL TO 1800 Edited by Patrick Carey In Collaboration With Michel René Barnes Alexander Golitzin Mickey Mattox Marcus Wriedt David Schultenover Wanda Zemler-Cizewski 1 CONTENTS SECTION I: LATE MEDIEVAL THEOLOGY, 1350-1500 Jean Gerson ............................................................ 1 On Mystical Theology .............................................. 2 Jean Gerson: Selections from A Deo exivit, Contra curiositatem studentium and De mystica theologia speculativa, ed. and trans. Steven E. Ozment, Textus Minores, vol. 38 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1969), 47–73, 85–89. Gabriel Biel ........................................................... 13 The Circumcision of the Lord ....................................... 14 Heiko Augustinus Oberman, Forerunners of the Reformation: The Shape of Late Medieval Thought (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966), 165–74. Desiderius Erasmus ..................................................... 22 The Praise of Folly ................................................ 23 Karl F. Thompson, ed., Middle Ages, Renaissance, and Reformation, 3rd ed., Classics of Western Thought, vol. 2 (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1980), 286–302. Excerpts from Desiderius Erasmus, The Praise of Folly, trans. by Hoyt Hopewell Hudson (copyright 1941 © 1969 by Princeton University Press; Princeton Paperback, 1970), 16–125. SECTION II: BYZANTINE CHURCH, 1350-1800 Nicholas Cabasilas ...................................................... 36 The Life in Christ ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Public Reasons Works of John Finnis Available from Oxford University Press
    Religion and Public Reasons Works of John Finnis available from Oxford University Press Reason in Action Collected Essays: Volume I Intention and Identity Collected Essays: Volume II Human Rights and Common Good Collected Essays: Volume III Philosophy of Law Collected Essays: Volume IV Religion and Public Reasons Collected Essays: Volume V Natural Law and Natural Rights Second Edition Aquinas Moral, Political, and Legal Theory Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism with Joseph Boyle and Germain Grisez RELIGION AND PUBLIC REASONS Collected Essays: Volume V John Finnis 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © J. M. Finnis, 2011 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Crown Copyright material reproduced with the permission of the Controller, HMSO (under the terms of the Click Use licence) Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion
    ABSTRACT Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A., M.A. Mentor: T. Michael Parrish, Ph.D. The trouble with “definitions” is they leave no room for evolution. When a word is concretely defined, it is done so in a particular time and place. Contextual interpretations permit a better understanding of certain heavy words; Atheism as a prime example. In the post-modern world Atheism has become more accepted and popular, especially as a reaction to global terrorism. However, the current definition of Atheism is terribly inaccurate. It cannot be stated properly that pagan Atheism is the same as New Atheism. By interpreting the Atheisms from four stages in the term‟s history a clearer picture of its meaning will come out, hopefully alleviating the stereotypical biases weighed upon it. In the interpretation of the Atheisms from Pagan Antiquity, the Enlightenment, the New Atheist Movement, and the American Judicial and Civil Religious system, a defense of the theory of elastic contextual interpretations, rather than concrete definitions, shall be made. Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion by Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Approved by the J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies ___________________________________ Robyn L. Driskell, Ph.D., Interim Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ T.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday January 5, 2003
    Apr 12, 2015 Second Sunday of Easter Trinity Lutheran Church, Cottage Grove, OR James L. Markus See it. Hear it. Proclaim it. 1 John 1:1–4 (ESV) — 1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life— 2 the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us— 3 that which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. 4 And we are writing these things so that our joy may be complete. Earlier this year, Time Magazine did an extensive feature on possible breakthroughs in human longevity. If I remember right, an article suggested that soon it would be possible for humans to routinely live over 120 years up to even 150 years. Of course that is nothing when compared to Methuselah who lived 969 years. While we might not want to live that long in this corrupted body in this evil world, we certainly can be grateful for medical technology which is lengthening the human life span. And, we do look forward to eternity. I find it interesting that it is more than simply Christians who believe in an afterlife. The great pyramids of Egypt were built to assure the Pharaoh of a great afterlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Protestant Reformed Theological Journal
    Protestant Reformed Theological j Journal VOLUME XXXV April, 2002 Number 2 In This Issue: Editor's Notes 1 Setting in Order the Things That Are Wanting (5) Robert D. Decker 2 A Comparison ofExegesis: John Calvin and Thomas Aquinas Russell J. Dykstra 15 The Serious Call of the Gospel - What Is the Well-Meant Offer of Salvation (2) Lau Chin Kwee 26 Nothing but a Loathsome Stench: Calvin"s Doctrine ofthe Spiritual Condition ofFallen Man David-J. Engelsma 39 Book Reviews 61 ++++ ISSN: 1070-8138 PROTESTANT REFORMED THEOLOGICAL JOURNAL Published twice annually by the faculty of the Protestant Reformed Theological Seminary: Robert D. Decker, Editor Russell J. Dykstra, Book Review Editor David J. Engelsma ++++ The Protestant Reformed Theological Joumal is published by the Protestant Reformed Theological Seminary twice each year, in April and November, and mailed to subscribers free of charge. Those who wish to receive the Journal should write the editor, at the seminary address. Those who wish to reprint an article appearing in the Journal should secure the permission of the editor. Books for review should be sent to the book review editor, also at the address ofthe school. Protestant Reformed Theological Seminary 4949 Ivanrest Avenue Grandville, MI 49418 USA EDITOR'S NOTES Prof. Russell J. Dykstra presents the first article ofa series on "A Comparison of Exegesis: John Calvin and Thomas Aquinas." Because of the stature of these two theologians (Calvin in the Protestant, Le., especially Reformed Protestant tradition; Aquinas in the Roman Catholic tradition), Dykstra points out that for these two men to be "compared and contrasted in many areas oftheirwork and thought is only natural." And indeed there are many works published contrasting these giants.
    [Show full text]
  • Gandhi Wields the Weapon of Moral Power (Three Case Stories)
    Gandhi wields the weapon of moral power (Three Case Stories) By Gene Sharp Foreword by: Dr. Albert Einstein First Published: September 1960 Printed & Published by: Navajivan Publishing House Ahmedabad 380 014 (INDIA) Phone: 079 – 27540635 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.navajivantrust.org Gandhi wields the weapon of moral power FOREWORD By Dr. Albert Einstein This book reports facts and nothing but facts — facts which have all been published before. And yet it is a truly- important work destined to have a great educational effect. It is a history of India's peaceful- struggle for liberation under Gandhi's guidance. All that happened there came about in our time — under our very eyes. What makes the book into a most effective work of art is simply the choice and arrangement of the facts reported. It is the skill pf the born historian, in whose hands the various threads are held together and woven into a pattern from which a complete picture emerges. How is it that a young man is able to create such a mature work? The author gives us the explanation in an introduction: He considers it his bounden duty to serve a cause with all his ower and without flinching from any sacrifice, a cause v aich was clearly embodied in Gandhi's unique personality: to overcome, by means of the awakening of moral forces, the danger of self-destruction by which humanity is threatened through breath-taking technical developments. The threatening downfall is characterized by such terms as "depersonalization" regimentation “total war"; salvation by the words “personal responsibility together with non-violence and service to mankind in the spirit of Gandhi I believe the author to be perfectly right in his claim that each individual must come to a clear decision for himself in this important matter: There is no “middle ground ".
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15: Resources This Is by No Means an Exhaustive List. It's Just
    Chapter 15: Resources This is by no means an exhaustive list. It's just meant to get you started. ORGANIZATIONS African Americans for Humanism Supports skeptics, doubters, humanists, and atheists in the African American community, provides forums for communication and education, and facilitates coordinated action to achieve shared objectives. <a href="http://aahumanism.net">aahumanism.net</a> American Atheists The premier organization laboring for the civil liberties of atheists and the total, absolute separation of government and religion. <a href="http://atheists.org">atheists.org</a> American Humanist Association Advocating progressive values and equality for humanists, atheists, and freethinkers. <a href="http://americanhumanist.org">americanhumanist.org</a> Americans United for Separation of Church and State A nonpartisan organization dedicated to preserving church-state separation to ensure religious freedom for all Americans. <a href="http://au.org">au.org</a> Atheist Alliance International A global federation of atheist and freethought groups and individuals, committed to educating its members and the public about atheism, secularism and related issues. <a href="http://atheistalliance.org">atheistalliance.org</a> Atheist Alliance of America The umbrella organization of atheist groups and individuals around the world committed to promoting and defending reason and the atheist worldview. <a href="http://atheistallianceamerica.org">atheistallianceamerica.org< /a> Atheist Ireland Building a rational, ethical and secular society free from superstition and supernaturalism. <a href="http://atheist.ie">atheist.ie</a> Black Atheists of America Dedicated to bridging the gap between atheism and the black community. <a href="http://blackatheistsofamerica.org">blackatheistsofamerica.org </a> The Brights' Net A bright is a person who has a naturalistic worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins Is Another
    BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT ooks about science tend to fall into two categories: those that explain it to lay people in the hope of cultivat- Bing a wide readership, and those that try to persuade fellow scientists to support a new theory, usually with equations. Books that achieve both — changing science and reach- ing the public — are rare. Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859) was one. The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins is another. From the moment of its publication 40 years ago, it has been a sparkling best-seller and a TERRY SMITH/THE LIFE IMAGES COLLECTION/GETTY SMITH/THE LIFE IMAGES TERRY scientific game-changer. The gene-centred view of evolution that Dawkins championed and crystallized is now central both to evolutionary theoriz- ing and to lay commentaries on natural history such as wildlife documentaries. A bird or a bee risks its life and health to bring its offspring into the world not to help itself, and certainly not to help its species — the prevailing, lazy thinking of the 1960s, even among luminaries of evolution such as Julian Huxley and Konrad Lorenz — but (uncon- sciously) so that its genes go on. Genes that cause birds and bees to breed survive at the expense of other genes. No other explana- tion makes sense, although some insist that there are other ways to tell the story (see K. Laland et al. Nature 514, 161–164; 2014). What stood out was Dawkins’s radical insistence that the digital information in a gene is effectively immortal and must be the primary unit of selection.
    [Show full text]