DOCSLIB.ORG

Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon Oncorhynchus Keta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Synopsis of Biological Data on the Chum Salmon Oncorhynchus Keta FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 41 BCF/S 41 SAST Chum ea1mon - 1,23(O1),009,03 SYNOPSIS OF BlOLOGîCAL DATA ON THE CHUM SALMON,, Oncorhy.nchus kéta (Wàîba urn) 1792 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Circular 315 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Walter J. Hickel, Secretary Russell E. Train, Under Secretary Leslie L. Glasgow, Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife, Parks, and Marine Resources Charles H. Meacham, Comlni8eioner, U.S. FISH AND WILDUJFE SERVICE Philip M. Roedel, Director, BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Synopsis of Biological Data onthe Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum) 1792 By RICHARD G. BAKKALA FAO Species Synopsis No, 41 Circular 315 Washington, D.C. March 1970 CONTENTS Pag e Introduction i Identity i 1.1 Nomenclature i 1.2 Taxonomy i 1.3 Morphology 5 2 Distribution 8 2.1Total areas 8 2.2 Differential distribution 9 2.3 Determinants of distribution 10 2.4 Hybridization il 3 Bionomics and life history 12 3.1 Reproduction 12 3.2 Preadult phase 24 3.3 Adult phase 28 3.4 Nutrition and growth ¿9 3.5 Behavior 39 4 Population 42 4.1 Structure 42 4.2 Abundance and density (of population) 46 4.3 Natality and recruitment 50 4.4 Mortality and morbidity 51 4.5 Dynamics of population 57 4.6 Population in community and ecosystem 59 5 Fishery 60 5.1 Fishing equipment 60 5.2 Fishing areas 64 5.3 Fishing seasons 65 5.4 Fishing operations and results 65 6 Protection and management .. 73 6.1 Regulatory (legislative) measures 73 6.2 Control or alteration of physical features of the environment 73 6.3 Control or alteration of chemical features of the environment 74 6.4 Control or alteration of the biological features of the environment 74 6.5 Artificial stocking 74 7 Pond fish culture 76 Literature cited 76 'il. Synopsis ofBiologicalData on the Chum Salmon, Oncorhynchus keta(Walbaum) 1792 By RICHARD G. BAKKALA, Fishery Biologist Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Biological Laboratory Seattle, Washington 98102 ABSTRACT Information presented on the chum salmon includes nomenclature, taxonomy, morphology, distribution, ecology and life history, population dynamics, fishery, and protection and management. INTRODUCTION i IDENTITY The Fisheries Biology Branch of FAO has 1.1 Nomenclature formed a "Synopsis Association," composed of fishery agencies willing to contribute to the 1.11Valid name preparation of synopses on fishes and other Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum) Jordan and Gil- aquaticorganismsofcommercialvalue. bert (1882: 305, fig. 1). Several organizations, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Commercial 1.12 Synonymy Fisheries, have agreed to collaborate with FAO Adapted from Jordan and Evermann(1896). inthisundertaking. Synopses prepared by Bureau personnel will be published in the Salmo keta vel kayko Walbaum(179272). circular series and will follow the format pre- scribed by Rosa (1965). Salmo lagocephalus Pallas (1811: 372). Salmo japonensis Pallas (1811:382). The primarypurposeofthis series is to make existinginformation r e a di ly available to Salmo consuetus Richardson (1854:167). fishery scientistsaccording to a standard format, and thereby to draw attention to gaps Salmo dermatinus Richardson(1854: 169), in knowledge. It is hoped that synopses in thig Salmo canis Suckley (1862: series will be useful to scientists initiating 9). investigations of the species concerned, or of Oncorhynchus lagocephalus G'únther (1866: related ones, as a means of exchange of knowl- 161), edge among those already working on the species and as the basis for comparative study Oncorhynchus keta Jordan and Gilbert (1882: of fishery resources. 305). 1.2 Taxonomy The chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) spawns in five countries (the United States, 1.21 Affinities (According to Berg, Canada, Japan, Korea, and the U.S.S.R.) and 1947) is most abundant on theAsian continent; there- fore, a complete synopsis on its biology should Suprageneric be based on studies from all five countries. I Phylum Verteb rata tried to achieve this aim as nearly as possible. Subphylum Craniata My review of the literature was restricted, Superclass Gnathostomata however, to the studies published in English Series Pisces or to the Japanese and Russian studies that Cias s Teleostomi had been translated into English. Consequently Subclass Actinopterygii some important information has undoubtedly Order Clupeiformes been omitted, and I hope that it willbe added Suborder Salmonoidei to the synopsis when it is updated inthe future. Family Salmonidae i Figure l.--The chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum). (Photograph courtesy of National Fisherman) Generic Pacific in North America and Asia, spawning in the fall." Oncorhynchus Suckley, 1861 (1862:313) Specific Genotype: The type specimen is SalmoketaofWalbaum Salmo scouleri (Richardson) (1792: 72) from the Kamchatka River. The original description, as cited by Okada (1960) The generic name is derived from Greek is: Onkos (hook) and rhynchos (snout). Salmo keta VEL KAYKO WALBAUM The generic concept used here is that of 0. 14. P. 15. V. 11. A. 18. Jordan and Evermarin (1896): "Caput breve, obtusum. Corpus immac- "Body elongate, subfusiform, or com- ulatum. Cauda Lunata. Caroalba. pressed. Mouth wide; the maxillary long, Squamae argenteae. Dorsum viridescens. lanceolate, usually extending beyond the Capitur copiose in flumininbus Kamtsch- eye; jaws with moderate teeth, which be- atkae. come in the adult male enormously en- larged in front. Vomer long and narrow, "Salmo keta VEL KAYKO, Kraschein- flat, with a series of teeth both on the nikow, l.c. pag. 181. Salmonem Narkam head and the shaft, the latter series com- magnitudine aliquatenus superat: Caput paratively short and weak; palatines with oblongum, planum. Rostrum resimum, a series of teeth; tongue with a marginal Dentes, post quam aliquamdin in flumine series on each side; teeth ori vomer and moratus est, canins similes fuint. Lingua tongue often lost with age; no teeth on the acuta. Cauda parum bifurca. Dorsum hyoid bone. Branchiostegals more or less atro-viride, latera & abdomen similiter increased in number. Scales moderate or colorata ac allis selmonibus sed absque small. Dorsal fin moderate; anal fin maculis." comparatively elongate, of 14 to 20 rays. Pyloric appendages in increased number. Species diagnosis according to Clemens and Gill rakers rather numerous. Ova large. Wilby (1946): Sexual peculiarities very strongly devel- oped; the snout in the adult males in sum- "Body elongate, somewhat compressed; mer and fall greatly distorted; the pre- caudal peduncle slender, Head conical; maxillaries prolonged, hooking over the mouth terminal; teeth conical, strongly lower jaw, which in turn is greatly elong- developed, becoming fang-like in mature ate and somewhat hooked at tip; the teeth males; branchiostegals, 10 to 16; rakers on these bones also greatly enlarged. The on first gill arch, 19 to 26, short, stout, body becomes deep and compressed; a smooth, widely spaced. Fins: dorsal (1), fleshy hump is developed before the dor- 10 to 13; adipose, small, slender, fleshy; sal fin, and the scales of the back become anal,13 to17; pelvic, abdominal, each embedded in the flesh; the flesh, which is with fleshy appendage atbase;caudal, red and rich in spring, becomes dry and emarginate. Lateral line: slightly de- poor. Salmon, mostly of large size, as- curved, then straight. Scales: cycloid; in cending the rivers tributary to the North first row above lateral line, 130 to 153; ¿ on lateral line, 126 to 151. Pyloric caeca: Lateral-line scales 130- 147 (average 140 to 185. Colour: metallic blue on dor- about 139); branchiostegals 10-16; sal surface with occasional black speck- pyloric caeca 140-254 (average about Ungs; no black spots; black tinge on tips 205); anal rays 16-20 (complete of pectoral, anal and caudal fins, especi- count);gill rakers 19-26 (average ally in male; in maturing adults in fresh about22), rakers wide apart and water irregular reddish to dusky streaks without teeth; caudal peduncle slen- or bars across sides of body, white on der; parr marks short, elliptical or tipsof pelvic and anal fins. Flesh pale oval, extending little, if any, below pink. Young with parr marks as slender lateral line; no black speckling on bars,scarcely extending below lateral back or fins; breeding color anterior line and green iridescence on back. two-thirds of sides with bold jagged reddish line, posterior third of sides with jagged black line; mouth lining 'Length to 3 feet 2 inches. dark; obligatory anadromous, long seamigrations, abundant far off- "Distinguished by the absence of large shore Oncorhynchus keta, chum black spots from the body and the fins, salmon. the slender caudal peduncle, the tips of CC. Lateral-line scales 130- 165(average all fins except dorsal tinged with black, about 146); branchiostegals13-19; the series of dusky streaks or bars pyboric caeca 85-244 (average about across the sides of the body in mature 158);anal rays16-22 (complete adults in fresh water, the 20 to 26 smooth count);gill rakers 20-28 (average widely spaced rakers on the first gill about 24), rakers wide apart with arch, and the large number of pyloric large teeth; caudal peduncle stout; caeca. The young are readily recognized parr marks large vertical bars al- by the slender parr marks, scarcely ex- most bisected by lateral line; small tending below the lateral line, and the black speckling on back, dorsal fin, green iridescence on the back." and upper lobe of caudal fin, some- times extending onto adipose fin and The following key to the species of Oncor- lower lobe of caudal and faintly onto hynchus in North America is from Rourisefell anal fin; breeding adults without red (1962). on sides; mouth lining black; obliga- tory anadromous; long sea migra- "A. Lateral-line scales 160-198 (average tions; not abundant far offshore- -On- about 184); branchiostegals 9-15;py- corhynchustshawytscha, king bric caeca 95-224 (average about salmon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Solution for Universal Classification of Species Based on Genomic
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Plant Genomics Volume 2007, Article ID 27894, 8 pages doi:10.1155/2007/27894 Research Article A Solution for Universal Classification of Species Based on Genomic DNA Mariko Kouduka,1 Daisuke Sato,1 Manabu Komori,1 Motohiro Kikuchi,2 Kiyoshi Miyamoto,3 Akinori Kosaku,3 Mohammed Naimuddin,1, 4 Atsushi Matsuoka,5 and Koichi Nishigaki1, 6 1 Department of Functional Materials Science, Saitama University, Saitama, Japan 2 Chitose Salmon Aquarium Chitose, Youth Educational Foundation, Chitose, Hokkaido, Japan 3 Institute of Medical Science, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan 4 Biol. Res. and Functions, National Inst. AIST, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 5 Department of Geology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan 6 Rational Evolutionary Design of Advanced Biomolecules, Saitama Small Enterprise Promotion Corporation, SKIP City, Saitama, Japan Received 22 July 2006; Revised 8 October 2006; Accepted 8 October 2006 Recommended by Cheng-Cang Wu Traditionally, organisms have been classified on the basis of their phenotype. Recently, genotype-based classification has become possible through the development of sequencing technology. However, it is still difficult to apply sequencing approaches to the analysis of a large number of species due to the cost and labor. In most biological fields, the analysis of complex systems compris- ing various species has become an important theme, demanding an effective method for handling a vast number of species. In this paper, we have demonstrated, using plants, fish, and insects, that genome profiling, a compact technology for genome analysis, can classify organisms universally. Surprisingly, in all three of the domains of organisms tested, the phylogenetic trees generated from the phenotype topologically matched completely those generated from the genotype.
    [Show full text]
  • Cottus Poecilopus Heckel, 1836, in the River Javorin- Ka, the Tatra
    Oecologia Montana 2018, Cottus poecilopus Heckel, 1836, in the river Javorin- 27, 21-26 ka, the Tatra mountains, Slovakia M. JANIGA, Jr. In Tatranská Javorina under Muráň mountain, a small fish nursery was built by Christian Kraft von Institute of High Mountain Biology University of Hohenlohe around 1930. The most comprehensive Žilina, Tatranská Javorina 7, SK-059 56, Slovakia; studies on fish from the Tatra mountains were writ- e-mail:: [email protected] ten by professor Václav Dyk (1957; 1961), Dyk and Dyková (1964a,b; 1965), who studied altitudinal distribution of fish, describing the highest points where fish were found. His studies on fish were likely the most complex studies of their kind during that period. Along with his wife Sylvia, who illus- Abstract. This study focuses on the Cottus poe- trated his studies, they published the first realistic cilopus from the river Javorinka in the north-east studies on fish from the Tatra mountains including High Tatra mountains, Slovakia. The movement the river Javorinka (Dyk and Dyková 1964a). Feri- and residence of 75 Alpine bullhead in the river anc (1948) published the first Slovakian nomenclature were monitored and carefully recorded using GPS of fish in 1948. Eugen K. Balon (1964; 1966) was the coordinates. A map representing their location in next famous ichthyologist who became a recognised the river was generated. This data was collected in expert in the fish fauna of the streams of the Tatra the spring and summer of 2016 and in the autumn mountains, the river Poprad, and various high moun- of 2017. Body length and body weight of 67 Alpine tain lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Edna Assay Development
    Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
    [Show full text]
  • Barbatula Leoparda (Actinopterygii, Nemacheilidae), a New Endemic Species of Stone Loach of French Catalonia
    Scientific paper Barbatula leoparda (Actinopterygii, Nemacheilidae), a new endemic species of stone loach of French Catalonia by Camille GAULIARD (1), Agnès DETTAI (2), Henri PERSAT (1, 3), Philippe KEITH (1) & Gaël P.J. DENYS* (1, 4) Abstract. – This study described a new stone loach species in France, Barbatula leoparda, which is endemic to French Catalonia (Têt and Tech river drainages). Seven specimens were compared to 49 specimens of B. bar- batula (Linnaeus, 1758) and 71 specimens of B. quignardi (Băcescu-Meşter, 1967). This new species is char- acterized by the presence of blotches on the belly and the jugular area in individuals longer than 47 mm SL and by a greater interorbital distance (35.5 to 41.8% of the head length). We brought moreover the sequence of two mitochondrial markers (COI and 12S, respectively 652 and 950 bp) of the holotype, which are well distinct from all other species, for molecular identifications. This discovery is important for conservation. Résumé. – Barbatula leoparda (Actinopterigii, Nemacheilidae), une nouvelle espèce endémique de loche fran- che en Catalogne française. © SFI Submitted: 4 Jun. 2018 Cette étude décrit une nouvelle espèce de loche franche en France, Barbatula leoparda, qui est endémique Accepted: 23 Jan. 2019 Editor: G. Duhamel à la Catalogne française (bassins de la Têt et du Tech). Sept spécimens ont été comparés à 49 spécimens de B. barbatula (Linnaeus, 1758) et 71 spécimens de B. quignardi (Băcescu-Meşter, 1967). Cette nouvelle espèce est caractérisée par la présence de taches sur le ventre et dans la partie jugulaire pour les individus d’une taille supérieure à 47 mm LS et par une plus grande distance inter-orbitaire (35,5 to 41,8% de la longueur de la tête).
    [Show full text]
  • Huchen (Hucho Hucho) ERSS
    Huchen (Hucho hucho) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, April 2011 Revised, January 2019, February 2019 Web Version, 4/30/2019 Photo: Liquid Art. Licensed under CC-SA 4.0 International. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Danube_Salmon_-_Huchen_(Hucho_hucho).jpg. (January 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Europe: Danube drainage [Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, and Ukraine].” “Population has declined [in Slovenia] due to pollution and river regulation. Conservation measures include artificial propagation and stocking [Povz 1996]. Status of threat: Regionally extinct [Bianco and Ketmaier 2016].” 1 “Considered locally extinct (extirpated) in 1990 [in Switzerland] [Vilcinskas 1993].” “Extinct in the wild in 2000 [in Czech Republic] [Lusk and Hanel 2000]. This species is a native species in the basin of the Black Sea (the rivers Morava and Dyje). At present, its local and time- limited occurrence depends on the stocking material from artificial culture. Conditions that will facilitate the formation of a permanent population under natural conditions are not available [Lusk et al. 2004]. […] Status of threat: extinct in the wild [Lusk et al. 2011].” From Freyhof and Kottelat (2008): “The species is severely fragmented within the Danube drainage, where most populations exclusively depend on stocking and natural reproduction is very limited due to habitat alterations and flow regime changes.” From Grabowska et al. (2010): “The exceptional case is huchen (or Danubian salmon), Hucho hucho. The huchen’s native range in Poland was restricted to two small rivers (Czarna Orawa and Czadeczka) of the Danube River basin, […]” Status in the United States Froese and Pauly (2019) report an introduction to the United States between 1870 and 1874 that did not result in an established population.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleuronectidae
    FAMILY Pleuronectidae Rafinesque, 1815 - righteye flounders [=Heterosomes, Pleronetti, Pleuronectia, Diplochiria, Poissons plats, Leptosomata, Diprosopa, Asymmetrici, Platessoideae, Hippoglossoidinae, Psettichthyini, Isopsettini] Notes: Hétérosomes Duméril, 1805:132 [ref. 1151] (family) ? Pleuronectes [latinized to Heterosomi by Jarocki 1822:133, 284 [ref. 4984]; no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Pleronetti Rafinesque, 1810b:14 [ref. 3595] (ordine) ? Pleuronectes [published not in latinized form before 1900; not available, Article 11.7.2] Pleuronectia Rafinesque, 1815:83 [ref. 3584] (family) Pleuronectes [senior objective synonym of Platessoideae Richardson, 1836; family name sometimes seen as Pleuronectiidae] Diplochiria Rafinesque, 1815:83 [ref. 3584] (subfamily) ? Pleuronectes [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Poissons plats Cuvier, 1816:218 [ref. 993] (family) Pleuronectes [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Leptosomata Goldfuss, 1820:VIII, 72 [ref. 1829] (family) ? Pleuronectes [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Diprosopa Latreille, 1825:126 [ref. 31889] (family) Platessa [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Asymmetrici Minding, 1832:VI, 89 [ref. 3022] (family) ? Pleuronectes [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Platessoideae Richardson, 1836:255 [ref. 3731] (family) Platessa [junior objective synonym of Pleuronectia Rafinesque, 1815, invalid, Article 61.3.2 Hippoglossoidinae Cooper & Chapleau, 1998:696, 706 [ref. 26711] (subfamily) Hippoglossoides Psettichthyini Cooper & Chapleau, 1998:708 [ref. 26711] (tribe) Psettichthys Isopsettini Cooper & Chapleau, 1998:709 [ref. 26711] (tribe) Isopsetta SUBFAMILY Atheresthinae Vinnikov et al., 2018 - righteye flounders GENUS Atheresthes Jordan & Gilbert, 1880 - righteye flounders [=Atheresthes Jordan [D.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Series No
    IARCHIVES FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Ser3esA No. 181 ON THE SCALE PATTERN OF KAMCHATKA SOCKEYE OF DIFFERENT LOCAL POPULATIONS By F. V. Krogiusa Doctor of Biological Sciences, Kamchatka Branch9 Pacific Research Institute for Fisheries and Oceanography (TINRO) Original titles 0 stroenii cheshui Kamchatskoi krasnoi raznykh lokalnykh stad Froms Materialy po biologii morskovo perioda zhizni dalnevostochnykh lososeie pp. 52-63, 1958. Published by Vsesoiuznyi Nauchno-Issledovatelskii Institut Morskovo Rybnovo Khoz.iaistva 3 Okeanografii (VNIRO)9 Moscow Translated by R. Eo Foerster Distributed by the Fisheries Research Board of Ganada9 Biological Station9 Nanaimoq B. C. 1958 [b. 521 In connection with studies of the distribution and routes of migration of salmon in the northwest portion of the Pacific Ocean, conducted by the Kamchatka Division of `fllüE?.0, it became necessary to ascertain if it is possible to determine9 by some method other than tagging, from what spawning river basins the sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka Walb) caught in the ocean origlnateo Conditions during the residence of sockeye in the spawning-nursery areas of Kamchatka and during the ocean period of their life on the routes of migration, and probably also in the marine feeding areas, are dissimilar for different stockso Thus differences arise in the periods of residences of the young sockeye in different nursery areas and in the ocean, i.e., variations occur in the rate of maturity and growth of sockeye of separate stocks. All these characteristics of life and growth of the sockeye are reflected in the pattern of their soaleso Long age.^ it was established that the scales of sonkeye, reared in different spawningGnursery a,reas, had dissimilar patterns (Gilbert, 1914m1925-, Foerster, 1929? Krogius and K.•okhin, 1956? Gerry Kiddq 19^°^6)o Howeverf, not baving a sufficiently representative knowledge of the patterns of scaleWp by which the fish, c•aughi, in the ocean, could be related to thd particular stocks produced in the different rivers, much confusion existed.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INVERTEBRATE SPECIES in the EASTERN BERING SEA By
    Effects of areas closed to bottom trawling on fish and invertebrate species in the eastern Bering Sea Item Type Thesis Authors Frazier, Christine Ann Download date 01/10/2021 18:30:05 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/5018 e f f e c t s o f a r e a s c l o s e d t o b o t t o m t r a w l in g o n fish a n d INVERTEBRATE SPECIES IN THE EASTERN BERING SEA By Christine Ann Frazier RECOMMENDED: — . /Vj Advisory Committee Chair Program Head / \ \ APPROVED: M--- —— [)\ Dean, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences • ~7/ . <-/ / f a Dean of the Graduate Sch6oI EFFECTS OF AREAS CLOSED TO BOTTOM TRAWLING ON FISH AND INVERTEBRATE SPECIES IN THE EASTERN BERING SEA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 6 By Christine Ann Frazier, B.A. Fairbanks, Alaska December 2003 UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS ABSTRACT The Bering Sea is a productive ecosystem with some of the most important fisheries in the United States. Constant commercial fishing for groundfish has occurred since the 1960s. The implementation of areas closed to bottom trawling to protect critical habitat for fish or crabs resulted in successful management of these fisheries. The efficacy of these closures on non-target species is unknown. This study determined if differences in abundance, biomass, diversity and evenness of dominant fish and invertebrate species occur among areas open and closed to bottom trawling in the eastern Bering Sea between 1996 and 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • XIV. Appendices
    Appendix 1, Page 1 XIV. Appendices Appendix 1. Vertebrate Species of Alaska1 * Threatened/Endangered Fishes Scientific Name Common Name Eptatretus deani black hagfish Lampetra tridentata Pacific lamprey Lampetra camtschatica Arctic lamprey Lampetra alaskense Alaskan brook lamprey Lampetra ayresii river lamprey Lampetra richardsoni western brook lamprey Hydrolagus colliei spotted ratfish Prionace glauca blue shark Apristurus brunneus brown cat shark Lamna ditropis salmon shark Carcharodon carcharias white shark Cetorhinus maximus basking shark Hexanchus griseus bluntnose sixgill shark Somniosus pacificus Pacific sleeper shark Squalus acanthias spiny dogfish Raja binoculata big skate Raja rhina longnose skate Bathyraja parmifera Alaska skate Bathyraja aleutica Aleutian skate Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Bathyraja lindbergi Commander skate Bathyraja abyssicola deepsea skate Bathyraja maculata whiteblotched skate Bathyraja minispinosa whitebrow skate Bathyraja trachura roughtail skate Bathyraja taranetzi mud skate Bathyraja violacea Okhotsk skate Acipenser medirostris green sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus white sturgeon Polyacanthonotus challengeri longnose tapirfish Synaphobranchus affinis slope cutthroat eel Histiobranchus bathybius deepwater cutthroat eel Avocettina infans blackline snipe eel Nemichthys scolopaceus slender snipe eel Alosa sapidissima American shad Clupea pallasii Pacific herring 1 This appendix lists the vertebrate species of Alaska, but it does not include subspecies, even though some of those are featured in the CWCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Framework for Management of Aquatic Invasive Species of Concern for Yukon: Literature Review, Risk Assessment and Recommendations
    DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGEMENT OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR YUKON: LITERATURE REVIEW, RISK ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared by: Maria Leung and Al von Finster Prepared for: Fish and Wildlife Branch, Environment Yukon April 2016 DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGEMENT OF AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR YUKON: LITERATURE REVIEW, RISK ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Yukon Department of Environment Fish and Wildlife Branch MRC-14-01 Maria Leung and Al von Finster prepared the report under contract to Environment Yukon. This report and its conclusions are not necessarily the opinion of Environment Yukon and this work does not constitute any commitment of Government of Yukon. © 2016 Yukon Department of Environment Copies available from: Yukon Department of Environment Fish and Wildlife Branch, V-5A Box 2703, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 Phone (867) 667-5721, Fax (867) 393-6263 Email: [email protected] Also available online at www.env.gov.yk.ca Suggested citation: LEUNG M. AND A. VON FINSTER. 2016. Development of a framework for management of aquatic invasive species of concern for Yukon: Literature review, risk assessment and recommendations. Prepared for Environment Yukon. Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Report MRC-14-01, Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. Preface Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) are non-native aquatic species that have a detrimental impact on environments that they invade. In Canada, millions of dollars are spent each year on control alone. From experiences across the country and around the world, experts have found that strategies aimed at preventing the spread of AIS are preferable to diverting financial resources to programs aimed at managing AIS after they have established.
    [Show full text]