COONAWARRA \ Little Black Book Cover Image: Ben Macmahon @Macmahonimages COONAWARRA \
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2019 BAROSSA WINE SHOW RESULTS CA TALOGUE Ne
#BarossaWS19 | #barossa |#barossawine |#barossa #BarossaWS19 SHARE THE GOODNEWS: 2019 BAROSSA WINE SHOW RESULTS CATALOGUE 42nd43rd BarossaBarossa WineWine ShowShow Major Sponsors 20192018 Barossa Wine Show Results Catalogue printed by: Judges & Committee Judges Committee Chairman of Judges Wine of Provenance Committee Chair Nick Ryan Judges Andrew Quin, Hentley Farm Andrew Wigan Panel Chair Judges Phil Reedman Committee PJ Charteris Louisa Rose Alex MacClelland, Bethany Wines Sue Bell Amanda Longworth, Adam Wadewitz Wine of Provenance Barossa Grape & Wine Association Associate Judge Bernadette Kaeding, Rojomoma Judges Katie Spain John Hughes, Rieslingfreak Mark Pygott, MW Peter Kelly, Thorn-Clarke Wines Tash Mooney Richard Langford, Two Hands Wines Phil Lehmann Brock Harrison, Elderton Wines Tim Pelquest-Hunt Will John, Yalumba Adrian Sparks Marie Clay, Treasury Wine Estates Kelly Wellington Helen McCarthy, Mountadam Vineyards Dave Bursey, Henschke Wines Associate Judges Mark Bulman Kate Hongell Ben Thoman Angus Seabrook Clare Dry Simon Mussared Greg Clack Caitlin Brown Brooke Blair Premium Section CLASSES 1 to 20 For wines vintaged from grapes grown in the Barossa Valley (Minimum 85%) Fortified Section CLASSES 21 to 24 For fortified wines vintaged from grapes grown in the Barossa Valley (Minimum 85%). Wines not necessarily commercially available. BAROSSA WINE SHOW 2019 1 RESULTS CATALOGUE Trophies 2019 Winners THE PERNOD RICARD WINEMAKERS - L HUGO GRAMP MEMORIAL TROPHY Best 2019 Riesling, Class 1 Class 1 – Entry 23 – 2019 Dandelion Vineyards -
FY2020 Invitational Fellowships for Research in Japan (Long-Term
List of Fellows (FY2020 Invitational Fellowships for Research in Japan (Long-term) Humanities The following list inclueds the names of the selected fellows, their host researchers and research themes under the FY2020 JSPS Invitational Fellowships for Research in Japan (Long-term). Under this recruitment, 187 applicants were received, among which 61 fellowships were awarded. Fellow' name Nationality Host Researcher Host Institution Research Theme (Family/First/Middle) ZERNIK Clelia FRANCE MORI Yoshitaka Tokyo University of the Arts A New Future Through the Eyes of Contemporary Japanese Artists HILLERT Dieter Gilberto GERMANY FUJITA Koji Kyoto University The Evolution of Higher Ordered Structures in Sequential Behavior DING Xixia CHINA GUO Junhai Kyushu University Research on Zatsuji Literatures Compiled by Japanese Experts during the Edo and Meiji Era RUSSIA Tokyo University of Foreign SYURYUN Arzhaana KOGURA Norikazu A new collaborative approach with Russia to the documentation and studies on Altaic languages FEDERATION Studies RUSSIA National Institutes for the The salvation and discrimination in the history of Japanese religion (focusing on the Hachiman DULINA Anna ISOMAE Junichi FEDERATION Humanities cult) BATMUNKH Tsogtbaatar MONGOLIA SHIRAISHI Noriyuki Niigata University Archaeological researches on the Mongol empire BORLONGAN Tokyo University of Foreign VILOG Ron bridget Tiburcio PHILIPPINES Language Issues of Migrants in Japan: The Case of Filipinos Ariane macalinga Studies - 1 - List of Fellows (FY2020 Invitational Fellowships for Research in Japan (Long-term) Social sciences The following list inclueds the names of the selected fellows, their host researchers and research themes under the FY2020 JSPS Invitational Fellowships for Research in Japan (Long-term). Under this recruitment, 187 applicants were received, among which 61 fellowships were awarded. -
'Geo-Log' 2016
‘Geo-Log’ 2016 Journal of the Amateur Geological Society of the Hunter Valley Inc. Contents: President’s Introduction 2 Gloucester Tops 3 Archaeology at the Rocks 6 Astronomy Night 8 Woko National Park 11 Bar Beach Geology and the Anzac Walkway 15 Crabs Beach Swansea Heads 18 Caves and Tunnels 24 What Rock is That? 28 The Third Great Numbat Mystery Reconnaissance Tour 29 Wallabi Point and Lower Manning River Valley Geology 32 Geological Safari, 2016 36 Social Activities 72 Geo-Log 2016 - Page 1 President’s Introduction. Hello members and friends. I am pleased and privileged to have been elected president of AGSHV Inc. for 2016. This is an exciting challenge to be chosen for this role. Hopefully I have followed on from where Brian has left off as he has left big shoes to fill. Brian and Leonie decided to relinquish their long held posts as President and Treasurer (respectively) after many years of unquestionable service to our society, which might I say, was carried out with great efficiency and grace. They have set a high standard. Thank you Brian and Leonie. We also welcomed a new Vice President, Richard Bale and new Treasurer John Hyslop. Although change has come to the executive committee the drive for excellence has not been diminished. Brian is still very involved with organising and running activities as if nothing has changed. The “What Rock Is That” teaching day Brian and Ron conducted (which ended up running over 2 days) at Brian’s home was an outstanding success. Everyone had samples of rocks, with Brian and Ron explaining the processes involved in how these rocks would have formed, and how to identify each sample, along with copious written notes and diagrams. -
Great Ocean Road and Scenic Environs National Heritage List
Australian Heritage Database Places for Decision Class : Historic Item: 1 Identification List: National Heritage List Name of Place: Great Ocean Road and Rural Environs Other Names: Place ID: 105875 File No: 2/01/140/0020 Primary Nominator: 2211 Geelong Environment Council Inc. Nomination Date: 11/09/2005 Principal Group: Monuments and Memorials Status Legal Status: 14/09/2005 - Nominated place Admin Status: 22/08/2007 - Included in FPAL - under assessment by AHC Assessment Recommendation: Place meets one or more NHL criteria Assessor's Comments: Other Assessments: : Location Nearest Town: Apollo Bay Distance from town (km): Direction from town: Area (ha): 42000 Address: Great Ocean Rd, Apollo Bay, VIC, 3221 LGA: Surf Coast Shire VIC Colac - Otway Shire VIC Corangamite Shire VIC Location/Boundaries: About 10,040ha, between Torquay and Allansford, comprising the following: 1. The Great Ocean Road extending from its intersection with the Princes Highway in the west to its intersection with Spring Creek at Torquay. The area comprises all that part of Great Ocean Road classified as Road Zone Category 1. 2. Bells Boulevarde from its intersection with Great Ocean Road in the north to its intersection with Bones Road in the south, then easterly via Bones Road to its intersection with Bells Beach Road. The area comprises the whole of the road reserves. 3. Bells Beach Surfing Recreation Reserve, comprising the whole of the area entered in the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR) No H2032. 4. Jarosite Road from its intersection with Great Ocean Road in the west to its intersection with Bells Beach Road in the east. -
Victoria's Hidden Gems
Victoria’s Hidden Gems Delve into the cosmopolitan sophistication and natural beauty of Victoria, journeying past elegant Melbournian arcades, sandstone peaks and the Twelve Apostles that stand imposingly along the spectacular coastline. From trendy cityscapes to quaint villages, scenic coastal drives to white-capped surf, Victoria’s intoxicating charm is revealed on this Inspiring Journey. Their original names: What we now call the Twelve Apostles were originally called The Sow and Piglets. The Sow was Mutton Bird Island, which stands at the mouth of Loch Ard Gorge, and her Piglets were the 12 Apostles. The Twelve Apostles 7 Days Victoria’s Hidden Gems IJVIC Flagstaff Hill Maritime Village Australian Surfing Museum Hepburn Bathhouse & Spa 7 DAYS Melbourne • Daylesford • Dunkeld • The Grampians • Warrnambool • Great Ocean Road • Mornington Peninsula Dunkeld Kitchen Garden Discover The eclectic town of Daylesford, with antique shops, bazaars and cottage industries The iconic Melbourne Cricket Ground Explore Melbourne’s vibrant laneways and arcades Green Olive Farm at Red Hill on the Mornington Peninsula Immerse Visit Creswick Woollen Mills, the last coloured woollen spinning mill in Australia Call in at the high-tech Eureka Centre in Ballarat Experience a Welcome to Country ceremony in the Grampians Browse the Australian National Surfing Museum in Torquay Relax Indulge in a relaxing mineral bath at the historic Hepburn Bathhouse & Spa Melbourne’s shopping arcades On a scenic coastal drive along the Great Ocean Road 7 Days Victoria’s Hidden -
Bellarine Peninsula – Distinctive Areas and Landscapes Phase Two Community Engagement Key Findings Report
Bellarine Peninsula – Distinctive Areas and Landscapes Phase Two Community Engagement Key Findings Report FINAL, 15 July 2020 REPORT © Capire Consulting Group Pty Ltd. This document belongs to and will remain the property of Capire Consulting Group Pty Ltd. All content is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without express written consent of Capire Consulting Group Pty Ltd. Authorisation can be obtained via email to [email protected] or in writing to: 96 Pelham Street Carlton VIC Australia 3053. Privacy Capire Consulting Group and any person(s) acting on our behalf is committed to protecting privacy and personally identifiable information by meeting our responsibilities under the Victorian Privacy Act 1988 and the Australian Privacy Principles 2014 as well as relevant industry codes of ethics and conduct. For the purpose of program delivery, and on behalf of our clients, we collect personal information from individuals, such as e-mail addresses, contact details, demographic data and program feedback to enable us to facilitate participation in consultation activities. We follow a strict procedure for the collection, use, disclosure, storage and destruction of personal information. Any information we collect is stored securely on our server for the duration of the program and only disclosed to our client or the program team. Written notes from consultation activities are manually transferred to our server and disposed of securely. Comments recorded during any consultation activities are faithfully transcribed however not attributed to individuals. Diligence is taken to ensure that any comments or sensitive information does not become personally identifiable in our reporting, or at any stage of the program. -
Evaluation of Humic Substances Used in Commercial Fertilizer Formulations
Final report FREP Project 07-0174 Evaluation of humic substances used in commercial fertilizer formulations T.K. Hartz Extension Specialist Department of Plant Sciences University of California 1 Shields Ave Davis, CA 95616 (530) 752-1738 [email protected] Executive summary: This project examined the effects of five commercial humic acid formulations on soil microbial activity, seed germination, early growth, nutrient uptake and crop productivity of lettuce and processing tomato. Humic acid solutions ranging from 250-750 PPM a.i. were used to imbibe coated lettuce seed; those seeds germinated at the same rate and frequency as seed imbibed with deionized water. In a greenhouse trial lettuce plants were grown from seed in pots of four field soils differing in phosphorus availability. The pots received pre-seeding banded application of humic acid alone, P fertilization (liquid 10-34- 0) alone, both humic acid and P fertilization, or neither treatment. In one of the four soils humic acid plus P increased lettuce growth above that of P fertilization alone. In the absence of P fertilization, no humic acid formulation increased lettuce growth in any soil. P fertilization increased plant P uptake in all soils, but humic acid did not increase P uptake in any soil. The effect of humic acid on soil microbial activity was evaluated in a laboratory assay using a low organic matter soil and a high organic matter soil (0.8 and 2.5% organic matter, respectively). The soils were wetted with tap water alone, P fertilizer solution, humic acid solution, or a solution containing both humic acid and P fertilizer. -
Hydrologic Soil Groups
AppendixExhibitAppendix A: Hydrologic AB Soil Synthetic Groups Hydrologic for theRainfall United SoilStates Distributions Groups and Rainfall Data Sources Soils are classified into hydrologic soil groups (HSG’s) Disturbed soil profiles to indicate the minimum rate of infiltration obtained for bareThe highest soil after peak prolonged discharges wetting. from Thesmall HSG watersheds’s, which arein the UnitedAs a result States of areurbanization, usually caused the soil by profileintense, may brief be rain- con- A,falls B, that C, and may D, occur are one as distinctelement eventsused in or determining as part of a longersiderably storm. These altered intense and the rainstorms listed group do not classification usually ex- may runofftended curve over anumbers large area (see and chapter intensities 2). For vary the greatly. conve- One commonno longer practice apply. inIn rainfall-runoffthese circumstances, analysis use is tothe develop follow- niencea synthetic of TR-55 rainfall users, distribution exhibit A-1 to uselists in the lieu HSG of actualclassifi- storming events. to determine This distribution HSG according includes to themaximum texture rainfall of the cationintensities of United for the States selected soils. design frequency arranged in a sequencenew surface that soil, is critical provided for thatproducing significant peak compaction runoff. has not occurred (Brakensiek and Rawls 1983). TheSynthetic infiltration raterainfall is the rate distributions at which water enters the soil at the soil surface. It is controlled by surface condi- HSG Soil textures tions.The length HSG ofalso the indicates most intense the transmission rainfall period rate contributing—the rate to the peak runoff rate is related to the time of concen- A Sand, loamy sand, or sandy loam attration which (T thec) for water the watershed.moves within In thea hydrograph soil. -
Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One
Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One Volume 1: Contextual Overview, Methodology, Lists & Appendices Prepared for Heritage Victoria October 2008 This report has been undertaken in accordance with the principles of the Burra Charter adopted by ICOMOS Australia This document has been completed by David Wixted, Suzanne Zahra and Simon Reeves © heritage ALLIANCE 2008 Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Project Brief .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Contextual Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Places of Potential State Significance .................................................................................... 35 3.1 Identification Methodology .......................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Verification of Places .................................................................................................................. 36 3.3 Application -
Varieties Barossa Chapters
Barossa Chapters Varieties Barossa Chapters Varieties Barossa owes much to Europe. Its name, cultural instincts, languages, food, viticultural and winemaking heritage, are all transportations that have been moulded and honed by 175 years of Australian innovation. Cover Image: Robert Hill-Smith & Louisa Rose Yalumba Barossa One could be forgiven for thinking Entrepreneurs with big visions built white wines such as Riesling and Barossa was settled by the Spanish. stone wineries and started making Chardonnay as well as medium body Its name can certainly be traced fortified “ports” and “sherries” as well reds such as Shiraz and Cabernet. back to the windswept Barrosa Ridge as fine table wines called “claret” and Now Barossa is the most recognised in the Spanish region of Andalusia “hermitage” and “burgundy”, paying name in Australian winemaking, due to where in March 1811 Lieutenant homage to European tradition. Barossa its forgiving viticultural environment, General Thomas Graham of the became the largest wine-producing its treasure-trove of century old British Army defeated the French region in Australia by the turn of the pre-phylloxera vines and its six Marshal Victor, during the Napoleonic century, sustaining a community of generations of grapegrowing and Peninsular Wars. grapegrowers, winemakers, cellar winemaking heritage. hands and coopers and earning Graham received a peerage and significant export income for the state But it has also evolved over 175 years was named Lord Lynedoch but it was of South Australia. into much more than a wine region. his young aide-de-camp Lieutenant Old Silesian cultural food traditions William Light who was to remember Through the 20th century Barossa had continue to be celebrated, such as the the name. -
NATIONAL VINEYARD SCAN 2018 Summary Report
NATIONAL VINEYARD SCAN 2018 Summary Report Date: 7 June 2019 Report Number: CT-TR-2019-00029 Document Version 1.0 Authors: Anthony Milton, Sebastien Wong, Sarah Hibbard Acknowledgements of project contributions: Adam Gatt, Bruce Hampton, Dale Ward, Eriita Jones, Hayden Hohns, Holly Whittenbury, John Campbell, Joseph Sclauzero, Joshua Kirkman, Juan Deng, Kristijan Ramesa, Lisa Neldner, Lucas Sargent, Mark McDonnell, Michael Rocca, Peter Bailey, Peter Kinne, Sandy Hathaway, Seth Thuraisingham, Scott Sleep, Travis Muirhead. Consilium Technology Pty Ltd ABN 44 143 250 882 1102/147 Pirie St, Adelaide SA 5000 [email protected] National Scan 2018 Foundation Data relating to wine production capability is of strategic importance to the Australian wine sector. Vineyard planting data was last made available by the Australia Bureau of Statistics (ABS) in 2015. Consilium Technology was engaged by Wine Australia in August 2018 to deliver a technical capability to resume the measurement of the production capacity of the Australian wine industry. The capability Consilium Technology developed1 is offered as a product known as GAIA (http://projectgaia.ai). This document outlines the methodology of how GAIA was used to deliver the National Scan 2018 and summarises the per-state, per-GI values for vineyard area and vine row length reported for the National Scan 2018. GAIA allows Wine Australia to obtain Foundation Data about the Australian wine industry on an ongoing basis by virtue of the radically different approach used, compared to previous methods. Previously, the ABS was tasked with producing a Vineyards Census. The ABS surveyed industry participants by sending the census to establishments identified as undertaking viticulture activity, with involvement in the survey being voluntary (there was an 87% response rate in 2015). -
Soil Fertility Research in Sugarcane in 2007
SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN 2007 Brenda S. Tubaña, Chuck Kennedy, Allen Arceneaux and Jasper Teboh School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station Summary Two experiments were conducted in 2007 to test the effect of different N rates on the yield and yield components of current sugarcane varieties. Spring application of N at rates of 0, 40, 80 and 120 lbs N ac -1 to LCP85-384, HoCP96-540 and L99-226 had no effect on plantcane yield. However, 40 and 80 lbs N ac -1 resulted in significantly higher sugar yield when compared with 120 lbs N ac -1 application rate. Stubble cane yield of LCP85-384, Ho95-988, and L97-128 showed response to spring N fertilization. Linear-plateau models estimated N rates that ranged from 42 to 80 lbs N ac -1 for optimum cane and sugar yield of these varieties. Two trials were also conducted to determine the effect of fertilizer adjuvant. Applications of Trimat, PGR and foliar NPK in addition with normal fertilization did not result in significant increases in the first- stubble cane and sugar yield of Ho95-988 and L97-128. Similarly, application of Helena Chemical products on top on standard practices did not result in significant increases in second- stubble cane and sugar yield of L97-128. Objectives This research was designed to provide information on soil fertility in an effort to help cane growers produce maximum economic yields and increase profitability in sugarcane production. This annual progress report is presented to provide the latest available data on certain practices and not as a final recommendation for growers to use all of these practices.