DOCSLIB.ORG

The Napoleon Series

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Napoleon Series The Napoleon Series List of Officers, Killed, Wounded, and Missing at Waterloo: 18 June 1815 (Extracted from the London Gazette.) KILLED General Staff—Lieutenant-General Sir Thomas Picton, G. C. B.; Major-General Sir W. Ponsonby, K. C. B.; Colonel Baron Charles Ompteda; Lieutenant-Colonel E. Currie, Ninetieth Foot, A. A. General. Brigade Major Staff, K. G. L.—Captain Henry Weigman. General Staff—Captain Honourable William Curzon, Sixty-ninth Foot, D. A. A. G.; Captain Walter Crofton, Fifty-fourth Foot, Brigade-Major; Captain T. Reignolds (Major), Second R. N. B. Dragoons, Brigade-Major; Captain Charles Eccles, Ninety-fifty Foot, Brigade-Major, Captain de Cloudt, K. G. L. First Life-Guards—Major Samuel Ferrior (Lieutenant-Colonel), and Captain M. Lind. Second Life-Guards—Richard Fitzgerald (Lieutenant-Colonel). Royal Regiment Horse-Guards Blue—Major Robert C. Pack. First Dragoon Guards—Captain John D. Bringhurst (Major); Captain George Battersby; and Adjutant Thomas Shelver. Second or R. N. B. Dragoons—Lieutenant-Colonel James J. Hamilton; Captain G. L. Barnard; Lieutenant Trotter; Cornets Edward Westly, F. C. Kinchant, and L. Shuldham. Sixth Dragoons—Adjutant Michael Cluskey. Tenth Hussars—Major Hon F. Howard, and Lieutenant George Gunning. Eleventh Light Dragoons—Lieutenant Edward Phillips. Twelfth Light Dragoons—Lieutenant L. J. Bertie, and Cornet J. F. Lockhart. Thirteenth Light Dragoons—Captain James Gubbins. Fifteenth Hussars—Major Edward Griffith, and Lieutenant Isaac Sherwood. Sixteenth Light Dragoons—Captain J. P. Buchanan; and Cornet Alexander Hay. First Light Dragoons, K. G. L.—Captain Frederick Peters; and Lieutenants C. F. Sevetson and Otto Kuhlmann. Second Light Dragoons, K. G. L.—Captain F. B. Bulow, and Cornet H. Drangmeister. Third Hussars, K. G. L.—Captain Augustus Kerssenbruh and George Jansen; Cornet William Deickmann; and Adjutant Henry Bruggemann. Royal Artillery, K. G. L.—Lieutenant Detlef de Schulzen. First Guards, second battalion—Sir Francis D’Oyley (Lieutenant-Colonel). First Guards, third battalion—Captains Edward Stables (Lieutenant-Colonel), and Charles Thomas (Lieutenant-Colonel); Ensign Edward Pardoe. Coldstream Guards, second battalion—Lieutenant John Lucie Blackman. Third Guards, second battalion—Lieutenants Honourable Hastings Forbes (Captain), Thomas Crawford (Captain), and John Ashton (Captain). First Foot, third battalion—Lieutenant William Young, and Ensign William Anderson. Twenty-third Foot, first battalion— Captains Joseph Hawtyn (Major), Charles Joliffe, and Thomas Farnier; Lieutenant G. Fensham. Twenty-seventh Foot, first battalion—Captain George Holmes; Ensign Samuel Ireland. Twenty-eighth Foot—Captain W. Meacham. Thirtieth Food, second battalion—Major J. W. Chambers; Captain Alexander M’Nabb; Lieutenants Henry Beere and Edward Prendergast; Ensigns John James and James Bullen. Thirty-third Foot—Lieutenants R. H. Buck and James Hart. Fortieth Foot, first battalion—Major A. R. Heyland; Captain W. Fisher. Fifty-second Foot—Ensign W. Nettles. Sixty-ninth Foot—Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Morice (Colonel); Captains Benjamin Hobhouse and R. Blackwood. Seventy-first Foot—Ensign John Todd. Seventy-third Foot—Captains Alexander Robertson and John Kennedy; Lieutenant Matthew Hollis; Ensigns Samuel Lowe and Charles Page. Seventh-ninth Foot, first battalion—Lieutenants D. M’Pherson and E. Kennedy. Ninety-fifth Foot, first battalion—First Lieutenant Edward Duncan Johnstone. First Light Battalion, K. G. L.—Captains Philip Holzermann, Henry Marschalk, and Alexander Goeben; Lieutenant Anthony Albert. Second Battalion, K. G. L.—Captains A. Boseweil (Major), and William Schaumann; Ensign Frederick Robertson. First Line Battalion, K. G. L.—Captain Charles Holle. Second Line Battalion, K. G. L.—Captain George Tibe. Third Line Battalion, K. G. L.—Captain Frederick Didel. Fourth Line Battalion, K. G. L.—Ensign Frederick Cronhelm. Fifth Line Battalion, K. G. L.—Captain C. Wurmb, Adjutant Laves Schuck. Eighth Line Battalion, K. G. L.—Captains William Voight and T. Westernhagen; Lieutenant William Mahrenholz. WOUNDED General Staff—General His Royal Highness the Prince of Orange, G. C. B. severely; Lieutenant-General the Earl of Uxbridge, G. C. B. severely (right leg amputated); Lieutenant-General Sir Charles Alten, K. C. B. severely; Major-General Cooke, severely (left arm amputated); Major-General Sir E. Barnes, K. C. B. severely; Major-General Frederick Adam, severely; Major-General Sir James Kempt, K. C. B. slightly; Major- General Sir Charles Halket, K. C. B. severely; Major-General Sir William Doernberg, K. C. B. severely; Major-General Sir Denis Pack, K. C. B. slightly; Colonel Charles Duplat, severely (since dead); Colonel Sir John Elley, K. C. B. Royal Horse Guards (Blue), D. A. G. severely. Permanent Staff—Colonel Sir William Delancey, K. C. B. Deputy-Quarter-Master- General, severely (since dead). General Staff—Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Henry Bradford, K. C. B. First Guards, Assistant- Quarter-Master-General, severely; Lieutenant-Colonel Honourable Alexander Abercrombie, Coldstream Guards, Assistant-Quarter-Master-General, slightly. Unattached—Lieutenant-Colonel John Waters, A. A. G. slightly. General Staff—Lieutenant-Colonel Sir H. Berkeley, K. C. B. Thirty-fifth Foot, A. A. G. severely; Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Alexander Gordon, K. C. B. Third Guards, Aid-de-camp to His Grace the Duke of Wellington, severely (since dead); Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Fox Canning, Aid-de-camp to His Grace the Duke of Wellington, severely (since dead); Major Honourable George Dawson, A. Q. M. G. slightly; Major Charles Beckwith, Ninety-fifth Foot, A. Q. M. G. severely; Major Andrew Hamilton, Fourth West-Indian Regiment Aid-de-camp to Major-General Sir E. Barnes, slightly; Major L’Estrange, Seventy-first Foot, Aid-de-camp to Major-General Sir D. Pack, severely (since dead); Captain Honourable E. S. Erskine, Sixtieth Foot, D. A. A. G. severely (left arm amputated); Captain Edward Fitzgerald, Twenty-fifth Foot, D. A. Q. M. G. slightly; Captain T. Hunter Blair (Major), Ninety-first Foot, Brigade-Major, severely; Captain G. de Eureur, Staff, K. G. L. severely; Captain T. Noel Harris, half-pay, severely (right arm amputated); Captain Henry Baines, Royal Artillery, slightly; Captain William Stothert, Third Guards, severely (since dead); Captain Orlando Bridgman, First guards, Aid-de- camp to Lord Hill, slightly; Captain Henry Dumaresq, Ninth Foot, Aid-de-camp to Major- General Byng, severely; Captain William Morey, Extra Aid-de-camp to Major-General Grant, severely; Lieutenant Ralph Mansfield, Fifteenth Hussars Aid-de-camp to Major- General Grant, slightly; Lieutenant James Rook, half-pay, Extra Aid-de-camp to His Royal Highness the Prince of Orange, slightly; Lieutenant J. H. Hamilton, Forty-sixth Foot D. A. A. G. slightly; Major William Thornhill, Seventh Hussars, Aid-de-camp to Lieutenant-General the earl of Uxbridge, severely; Captain Thomas Wildman, Seventh Hussars, Aid-de-camp to Lieutenant-General the Earl of Uxbridge, slightly; J. J. Fraser, Seventh Hussars, Aid-de-camp to Lieutenant-General the Earl of Uxbridge, slightly; Lieutenant Horace Seymour, Eighteenth Hussars, Aid-de-camp to Lieutenant-General the Earl of Uxbridge, slightly. First Life Guards—Captain Edward Kelly; Cornets William Richardson and Samuel Cox, severely. Royal Regiment Horse-Guards (Blue)—Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Robert C. Hill, severely; Lieutenant-Colonel Clement Hill, slightly; Lieutenants William Cunliffe Shawe and Everard William Bouverie, slightly. First Dragoon Guards—Captain Michael Turner, severely; Captain J. F. Naylog, slightly; Captain J. P. Sweney, severely; Lieutenant W. D. Irvine, slightly. First (Royal) Dragoons—Captain C. E. Radcliffe (M.) severely; Captain A. R. Clarke; Lieutenants G. Gunning and Sig. Trafford, slightly; T. R. Kelly, severely; Sam. Wyndowe, slightly; C. Ommany, S. Goodenough, and Charles Blois, severely. Second (R. N. B.) Dragoons—Majors J. B. Clarke (Lieutenant-Colonel), severely; J. P. Hankin (Lieutenant-Colonel), slightly; Captains James Poole (Major) and Richard Vernon, severely; Lieutenant John Mills, slightly; Francis Stupart, James Carruthers, Severely (since dead); and Charles Wyndham, severely. Sixth Dragoons—Lieutenant-Colonel Muter (Colonel), slightly; Major F. S. Miller (Lieutenant-Colonel); Captains W. F. Brown and Honourable S. Douglas; Lieutenant Alexander Hassard, severely. Seventh Hussars—Captains Thomas William Robins, William Vernor, and P. A. Heyliger; Lieutenants R. Douglas, Edward Peters, and Robert Beattie, severely. Tenth Hussars—Lieutenant-Colonel George Quentin (Colonel), severely; Captain John Grey, slightly; Captains John Gurwood and Charles Wood; Lieutenants Robert Arnold and Anthony Bacon, severely. Eleventh Light Dragoons—Captain J. A. Schreiber, slightly; Lieutenants Frederick Wood, severely; Richard Coles, slightly; and Robert Milligan, severely. Twelfth Light Dragoons—Lieutenant-Colonel Honourable F. C. Ponsonby (Colonel), and Captain Edwin Sandys, severely; Lieutenant W. H. Dowbeggen, slightly. Thirteenth Light Dragoons—Lieutenant-Colonel S. Boyce; Captains Joseph Doherty, George Doherty, and Charles Bowers, slightly; Lieutenant John Gale, severely (since dead); Lieutenant John Pym, severely (since dead); Lieutenants John H. H. Irwin, James Mill, and George H. Pack, slightly. Fifteenth Hussars—Lieutenant-Colonel Leighton Dalrymple, severely (leg amputated); Captain Joseph Thackwell, severely (arm amputated); Captain John R. Whiteford, and Lieutenant William Byam, severely; Lieutenants
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Young People's Gatherings in the Urban Public Realm Enhancement
    Young People's Gatherings Ref 066 in the Urban Public Realm enhancement of or distraction from its liveability Reem Zako University College London, London, United Kingdom [email protected] Keywords spatial configuration; social structures; urban space; public realm; young people Abstract This paper focuses on where young people gather in the urban public realm, and the effect that this may have on the perceived liveability of an area. Gatherings of young people have become very topical in the UK in recent years, especially because of the way that the public perceives this activity as intimidating and potentially aggressive. This has resulted in much concern by the public and interest by the press about the consequential antisocial nature of these gatherings, leading to government debate and legislation to control the antisocial behaviour of young children and adolescents in public space. The study is based on a questionnaire/survey distributed to residents in twenty housing estates and residential developments in London's city fringe district of Clerkenwell. The aim of the study was to capture the residents' perceptions about the liveability of their locality through an assessment of twenty-four different types of criteria relating to the built environment, including the condition of the urban fabric, the effects of traffic, and the prevalence of anti-social activities and behaviour. The dominant factor affecting the perceived liveability of an area was found to be the extent to which the public realm was blighted by the threatening nature
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of POLICING Foreword This Is My Report to the Secretary of State Under Section 54 of the Police Act 1996
    © PA Images STATE OF POLICINGOF STATE Foreword This is my report to the Secretary of State under section 54 of the Police Act 1996. It contains my assessment of the efectiveness FOREWORD and efciency of policing in England and Wales, based on the inspections we carried out between April 2018 and May 2019. My report on the efectiveness and efciency of fire and rescue services in England will be published separately. This report’s structure and purpose Part 1 contains my assessment of the state of policing in England and Wales. In making my assessment, I have drawn on the inspections we carried out over the past year, as well as the fndings and reports of other organisations, and other information and analysis available to me. Part 2 gives an overview of the fndings of the inspections we carried out between 1 April 2018 and 2 May 2019, including a summary of our police effciency, effectiveness and legitimacy (PEEL) inspections. Part 3 sets out the full list of our inspections and other work in the year in question. The results of our individual inspections enable an assessment of the performance of individual forces, or a more general assessment of performance in specifc aspects of policing. I hope that people, including the public, who hold policing to account will draw on the overall conclusions in this report just as much as they draw on the specifc conclusions we have reached for each force. 6 STATE OF POLICINGOF STATE FOREWORD © Sussex Police Changes to our PEEL programme Inspection is a continuous process of design, monitoring and reporting; it isn’t just when we have ‘boots on the ground’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metropolitan Police Act of 1829
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 55 Article 18 Issue 1 March Spring 1964 The etrM opolitan Police Act of 1829 J. L. Lyman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation J. L. Lyman, The eM tropolitan Police Act of 1829, 55 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 141 (1964) This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. POLICE SCIENCE THE METROPOLITAN POLICE ACT OF 1829: An Analysis of Certain Events Influencing the Passage and Character of the Metropolitan Police Act in England J. L. LYMAN J. L. Lyman, D. Pub. Adm. (Oxon.) is an Assistant Professor, Department of Social Science, Youngstown (Ohio) University. In addition to graduate study in history and political institutions at London University, Dr. Lyman spent time as an observer with the Metropolitan Police and various other English police units. In 1958 she lectured before the Ohio Chiefs of Police Association on the Organization and Administration of the Metropolitan Police, and has published articles in several other professional journals.-EDroR. The Metropolitan Police Act of 1829 introduced system had become ineffective. Tradition and the a centralized and unified system of police in concepts of tlhe new industrial capitalism delayed England. The Act constituted a revolution in both the recognition of, and the willingness to deal traditional methods of law enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland and the Waterloo Campaign of 1815 Peter Molloy
    Journal of Military History and Defence Studies Volume 1. Issue 1. (January 2020) Ireland and the Waterloo campaign of 1815 Peter Molloy Abstract Ireland’s experience of the Waterloo campaign has been consistently under- explored, despite the degree of attention paid to the campaign by historians. This paper shows that that experience was far more significant and multi-faceted than has generally been recognised. Irish people played an important practical role in the events of 1815. Irish soldiers saw service in their thousands during the campaign, at every rank from private to general. These men represented a comprehensive cross-section of contemporary Ireland, coming from every county on the island and from every kind of socio-economic background. Some Irish soldiers and military units earned distinction for their actions on the battlefield and a number of participants from the country left valuable primary testimony. Civilian Irish women and children were also caught up in events in Belgium. Domestically, Ireland was a centre of activity as hostilities against Napoleon developed and analysis of contemporary media coverage and private correspondence makes it clear that ongoing events on the Continent had a keenly engaged Irish audience. Waterloo also left a distinctive legacy for Ireland and for Irish people. This paper explores all of these issues in detail, providing a thorough examination based on primary sources to address the impact of Waterloo on Ireland, and of the Irish on Waterloo. This paper is a reproduction of an MA thesis submitted for the MA in Military History and Strategic Studies at Maynooth University in 2011 and published online via the Maynooth University Research Archive Library MURAL in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Confidence in the Police: Balancing Public Image with Community Safety - a Comparative Review of the Literature
    Confidence in the police: Balancing public image with community safety - A comparative review of the literature Author Keane, John, Bell, Peter Published 2013 Journal Title International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.06.003 Copyright Statement © 2013 Elsevier. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/64986 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Confidence in the police: balancing public image with community safety – a comparative review of the literature Examining the evolution of British and Australian policing, this comparative review of the literature considers the impact of community legitimacy derived from early concepts of policing by consent against contemporary policing challenges. Using the August 2011 disorder in Britain as a lens, this paper considers whether, in striving to maintain community confidence, undue emphasis is placed on the police’s public image at the expense of community safety. Examining the path of policing reform, the impact of bureaucracy on policing and the evolving debate surrounding police performance, this review suggests that, while largely delivering on the ideal of an ethical and strong police force, a preoccupation with self-image may in fact result in tarnishing the very thing British and Australian police forces strive to achieve – their standing with the public. This paper advocates for a more realistic goal of gaining public respect rather than affection in order to achieve the difficult balance between maintaining trust and respect as an approachable, ethical entity providing firm, confident policing in this ever-evolving, modern society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of the Irish Soldier to the British Army During the Peninsula Campaign 1808 – 1814
    The Journal of Military History and Defence Studies Volume 1 Issue 1 (January 2020) The contribution of the Irish soldier to the British Army during the Peninsula campaign 1808 – 1814 James Deery The majority of the historiography concerning the Irish contribution to the British army during their campaign on the Iberian Peninsula (1808 -1814) has focused on the Irish regiments and their service with Wellington in Portugal, Spain and France. While the significance of research into these regiments is undeniable it has unintentionally resulted in an under appreciation of the true extent of the Irish soldier’s contribution. The purpose of this paper is to add to the existing historiography by examining the wider Irish contribution in order to arrive at an empirical based assessment as to the criticality of the Irish soldier to Wellington’s victory during the Peninsula war. The majority of Irish soldiers who served in the Peninsula did so in English and Scottish infantry regiments. Their abilities and crucially their integration into the British army were key success factors for Wellington during the Peninsula campaign. An examination of how this was achieved forms a key part of this paper which finds that the capabilities of the Irish soldier and the British army organisational structure and system mutually supported each other. Furthermore, the Irish officer’s contribution has only been assessed based on individual accounts and narratives in the absence of any in-depth evaluation of their actual numbers. With over 30 per cent of Wellington’s officers being Irish an analysis of their levels of command was undertaken to demonstrate their significance to the overall conduct and operation of the Peninsula army.
    [Show full text]
  • Listed Building Appraisal 18 Charles Rowan House, Islington, London
    Listed Building Appraisal 18 Charles Rowan House, Islington, London wc1x 0eh Listed Building Consent Application by David Gibson Architects May 2013 David Gibson Architects 35 Britannia Row London N1 8QH (fax 020 7704 6946) 020 7226 2207 1315 / 130514 | | | page CONTENTS 1 LOCATION AND CONTEXT 2 SIGNIFICANCE 3 LISTING and DESCRIPTION 4 CONDITION 5 OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY 6 DESIGN AND LAYOUT PROPOSALS 7 DRAWINGS LIST David Gibson Architects 35 Britannia Row London N1 8QH (fax 7704 6946) 020 7226 2207 1315: 130514 Page 2 of 10 | | | Location and Context The intention of this report is to apply for listed building consent to renovate No 18 Charles Rowan House, a third floor, 3 bedrooms flat within the building. The building is surrounded by Margery Street to the north Amwell Street to the east Wilmington Street to the west and Merlin Street to the South. The internal court yard within offers bike cycle storage communal gardens and areas of seating, entrance to the court yard is from Margery Street and Merlin Street. It is a Grade II listed building and therefore the flat falls under the curtilage. Significance The building is within the New River Conservation area. Charles Rowan House was built as part of the development of Amwell Street in 1928 to 1930, built in the 1920s as married quarters for Metropolitan policemen to the designs of Gilbert McKenzie Trench, the Met’s architect. Sir Charles Rowan was one of the first Commissioners of the force when it was formed in the 1820s. Stylistically the building is unusual for the United Kingdom and exhibits a powerful Expressionist manner most often associated with continental design of this period.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Chief Constable of Shropshire, Captain Dawson Mayne by TONY MOORE
    Journal of the Police History Society | 31 (2017) The First Chief Constable of Shropshire, Captain Dawson Mayne By TONY MOORE Richard Mayne, later Sir Richard, is Guard Service,3 during which he one of the most famous policemen resided, for some of the time at least, in Britain, if not the world. With at 34 Norfolk Square in London.4 He Colonel Sir Charles Rowan, he was remained on the navy’s active list appointed by Sir Robert Peel in until retiring from it in 1856.5 1829 to set up the Metropolitan Police in London. Shortly after his appointment as chief constable, Dawson Mayne After being joint-commissioner married Elizabeth Mary Hewitt, with Rowan for 21 years, until daughter of William Hewitt of 1850, joint-commissioner with Jamaica, on 14 May 1840.6 Hewitt was a cousin of Rowland Hill, years, and sole Commissioner for the Member of Parliament for Shropshire from 1821 to 1832 and, in December 1868.1 But, what is often overlooked is that a younger on the re-alignment of boundaries, brother of Richard’s, Dawson for North Shropshire from 1832 to Mayne, set up the Shropshire County 1842 when, on the death of his uncle, Constabulary and served as its chief he succeeded to the title of 2nd Viscount Hill. Between 1845 and 1875 Viscount Hill was Lord Lieutenant of Shropshire. Whether his future wife’s Sir Richard Mayne, Early Life elder brother of Dawson Mayne his appointment as chief constable is Dawson Mayne was born in Ireland 1812 at the age of 13 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Use of Social Media to Support Community Engagement — Its Rise in Police Practice in the Uk
    EUROPEAN POLICE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH BULLETIN SPECIAL CONFERENCE EDITION POLICE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT — ITS RISE IN POLICE PRACTICE IN THE UK Nicholas John Keane United Kingdom Keywords: Police, social media, engagement Abstract: This essay looks at the adoption by the United Kingdom Police Forces of social media (i.e. Facebook and Twitter) as part of their engagement strategies. It highlights the policy drivers that have informed this work. It indicates areas for future research. There are many dimensions concerning police use Kingdom throughout the following decades; of social media — some commentators identify Reiner argued that it was a central theme of three main areas: engagement, intelligence UK policing in the 1970’s and 1980’s (Reiner, and enforcement (Bartlett et al, 2013). This 1992), however Hough argued that in the 1990’s essay focuses on police use of social media newer systems of police management meant with regard to engagement, defined by Myhill the concept was less in favour (Hough, 2007) as ‘the process of enabling the participation The current century, it is argued, has found two of citizens and communities in policing at different models of policing in tension with each their chosen level, ranging from providing other: the crime control model based on law information and reassurance to empowering enforcement and punishment and more subtle them to identify and implement solutions to models of social control based on procedural local problems and influence strategic priorities justice. (Hough et al, 2010). The procedural and decisions.’ (Myhill, 2006: iv). While the other justice model moves the emphasis away from two areas ´intelligence and enforcement’ will be understanding why people commit offences and mentioned in passing.
    [Show full text]
  • “Peel's” Principles of Policing
    Notes on “Peel’s” Principles of Policing Professor Peter Moskos Robert Peel, the creator of the first modern police force in 1829 London, and the first commissioners, Charles Rowan and Richard Mayne, wrote the original Patrol Guide: “Instructions to Police Officers.”1 It emphasized the prevention of crime, regular foot patrol, police discretion, and a professional demeanor. The following general instructions [do not apply] to every circumstance... something must necessarily be left to the intelligence and discretion of individuals. The principal object to be attained is “the prevention of crime.” To this great end every effort of the police is to be directed rather than by the detection and punishment of the offender after he has succeeded in committing the crime. When in any area offenses are frequently committed, there must be reason to suspect that the police are not in the area properly conducted. The absence of crime is the best proof of the efficiency of the police. He should be able to see every part of his beat, at least once in ten minutes or a quarter of an hour. It is indispensably necessary, that he should make himself perfectly acquainted with all the parts of his beat or section, with the streets, thoroughfares, courts, and houses. He will be expected to possess such a knowledge of the inhabitants of each house, as will enable him to recognize their persons. ... He will keep in mind that prevention of crime will be best attained by making it evident, that they are known and strictly watched, and that certain detection will follow any attempt to commit a crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Rowan Companies, Inc
    ROWAN COMPANIES, INC. 2001 Annual Report COMPANY PROFILE DRILLING Rowan Companies, Inc., founded in 1923, is a major international offshore and land drilling contractor. MANUFACTURING LeTourneau, Inc. operates a mini-steel mill, a manufacturing facility that produces heavy equipment for the mining, timber and transportation industries, and a drilling products division that has designed or built about one-third of all mobile offshore jack-up drilling rigs. AVIATION Era Aviation, Inc. is an international aviation organization operating helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. TABLE OF CONTENTS Financial Highlights 1 Letter to Stockholders 4 Questions and Answers about Rowan 6 Operations Review 8 Equipment 12 Ten-Year Financial Review 14 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 16 Selected Quarterly Financial Data 22 Common Stock Price Range, Cash Dividends and Stock Splits 22 Independent Auditors’ Report 23 Consolidated Balance Sheet 24 Consolidated Statement of Operations 25 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) 25 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity 26 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 27 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 28 Corporate Directory 38 Stockholders’ Information 39 Directors and Officers 40 2 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, (In thousands except per share amounts and ratios) 2001 2000 1999 Revenues $ 731,064 $ 645,959 $ 460,562 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 120,207 $ 110,863 $ (14,536) Net income (loss) $ 76,998
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland and the Waterloo Campaign of 1815’
    ‘Ireland and the Waterloo campaign of 1815’ by Peter Molloy In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MA in Military History and Strategic Studies Department of History National University of Ireland Maynooth Supervisor of research: Dr David Murphy October 2011 Contents 1. Introduction (p. 4) 2. The Hundred Days and the Waterloo campaign, March-July 1815 (p. 10) 3. Ireland and the outbreak of hostilities (p. 13) 4. Irish soldiers and the Waterloo campaign (p. 20) 5. Irish military experiences during the Waterloo campaign (p. 36) 6. Ireland and the aftermath of hostilities (p. 49) 7. Conclusion (p. 59) 8. Appendices: (i) Illustrations (p. 62) (ii) Irish Waterloo campaign veterans – 3rd Battalion, 1st Foot (p. 68) (iii) Irish Waterloo campaign veterans – 1st Battalion, 32nd Foot (p. 73) 9. Bibliography (p. 78) 2 Acknowledgements Over the course of my year as a postgraduate student at NUI Maynooth, and in some cases well before that, a number of people have been of tremendous help and assistance. I wish in particular to thank my supervisor for this thesis, Dr David Murphy, who has been an unfailing and good-humoured source of advice and encouragement; not simply during the drafting of this work, but indeed throughout the MA programme in Military History and Strategic Studies. I would also like to thank the other staff, lecturers and students I have encountered on the course, all of whom have contributed to a most enjoyable and enlightening year of study. Mr Michael Wardick, Head Heritage Guide at the former Royal Hospital Kilmainham, was enormously helpful with my enquiries for information about the Irish veterans of the Waterloo campaign who became in-patients of that institution during the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]