DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment Scoping Statement Southampton Biomass

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Scoping Statement Southampton Biomass Switching On The Green Light Environmental Assessment Scoping Statement Southampton Biomass Power Ltd Proposed 100MW Biomass Fuelled Electricity Generating Plant, Southampton Port September 2010 Version 4.0 Prepared By: Helius Energy Plc 242 Marylebone Road London NW1 6JL Tel: 020 7723 6272 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Consultation 3.0 The Proposed Development Site 4.0 The Development Proposals 5.0 Planning Policy Context 6.0 Baseline Conditions 7.0 Identifying Environmental Issues 8.0 Scoping the Environmental Statement 9.0 Non Significant Issues 10.0 Proposed Structure of the Environmental Statement SCHEDULE OF APPENDICES Appendix A EIA Scope of Significant Issues Appendix B Maps of International and National Nature Conservation Designations within 5 km Appendix C Southampton City Council Highways Consultation PLAN SPTN-9001-2.0 Site Boundary SPTN-9002-2.0 Aerial View of Primary Development Area SPTN-9003-1.0 Site Location Plan SPTN-1002-1.0 Site Elevation SPTN-1003-1.0 Site Elevation SPTN-1004-2.0 Associated Development SPTN-1005-2.0 Primary Development Layout FIGURES Figure 4.16 Process Flow Southampton Scoping Statement v4.0 Page 2 September 2010 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Helius Energy plc (“Helius Energy”) is seeking to obtain development consent under Section 31 of the Planning Act 2008 in respect of a biomass fuelled electricity generating plant capable of generating approximately 100 Megawatts (Declared Net Capacity) of electricity and associated biomass processing and fuel store, boiler house, turbine building, cooling assembly, ancillary buildings, structures, plant and equipment together with other engineering and building works located within the Port of Southampton (Grid Reference SU 396 124). The general location of the site is shown on plan number SPTN-9003-1.0. The proposed site area is shown on plan number SPTN-9001-2.0 and SPTN-9002-2.0. Detailed Description of Development for which Consent will be Sought 1.2 Consent will be sought for a biomass fuelled electricity generating plant as the primary development. This will be capable of generated approximately 100 Megawatts (declared net capacity) of electricity and comprise the following principal buildings, structures, plant and engineering works: i Main Biomass Store Building; ii Auxiliary Biomass Fuel Stores; iii Fuel Delivery Building (Road Deliveries); iv Boiler House (comprising one circulating fluidised bed boiler); v Steam Turbine Building (accommodating one steam turbine) vi Transformer Building; vii Motor Control Centre Building; viii Electrical Switch Gear Compound; ix Water Treatment Plant; x Grey/fresh water Storage Tanks; xi Stack Assembly; xii Flue Gas Cleaners; xiii Cooling Assembly (Hybrid Towers or Air Cooled Condenser); xiv Office Accommodation; xv Storage/Workshop/Control Building; xvi Pipes for Hot Water/ Steam Pass Outs and Returns; xvii Weighbridges and Security Gatehouse; xviii Internal Site Access Roads, Hardstandings, Parking Facilities and Pedestrian Walkways Including Access to the Internal Dock Road Network; and xix Bunding, Earthworks, Landscaping, Site Lighting and Boundary Treatments. 1.3 Consent will also be sought for associated development comprising: Southampton Scoping Statement v4.0 Page 3 September 2010 i Underground connections for cooling water supply and discharge, potable and grey water supply, discharge of process water, discharge of foul water, surface water management systems and surface water discharge; ii Grey water extraction structure and Pump house; and iii Underground electrical connection to the existing electricity grid infrastructure. 1.4 Consent will also be sought for the following ancillary works: i Demolishing existing substation and removal of existing hardstandings. 1.5 The scheme will also incorporate a conveyor from the site to the quayside. Planning permission is already granted for this by virtue of Class B Part 17 of Schedule 2 to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995. 1.6 Deemed Listed Building Consent will also be sought, if necessary, for any works that may be undertaken to the George V Dock, pursuant to the grey water extraction structure and Pump house. Need for Environment Impact Assessment 1.7 It is considered that the proposed development falls within Schedule 2, Category 3(1) of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009. It is of a scale and nature that could give rise to significant effects and, therefore, the applicant has undertaken to submit an Environmental Statement (ES) with the application for a Development Consent Order. 1.8 As part of the project development and assessment process, the project team has carried out a scoping study to identify the key environmental issues and the need for specific investigations and other technical studies. The scope for the proposed environmental impact assessment (EIA), as presented in this document, has been determined by the following: i Desktop and baseline field studies; ii Consideration of the relevant development plans for the area including the saved policies from the Southampton Revised Local Plan (2006) and the Southampton Core Strategy (2010); and iii Identification of potential sources of environmental effects and an evaluation of likely duration in magnitude and significance. 1.9 The ES will be a comprehensive account of all significant environmental and associated issues, as required in the EIA Regulations. Southampton Scoping Statement v4.0 Page 4 September 2010 EIA and Scoping 1.10 Government Circular 02/99 on environmental impact assessment defines EIA as: “a means of drawing together, in a systematic way, an assessment of a project's likely significant environmental effects. This helps to ensure that the importance of the predicted effects, and the scope for reducing them, are properly understood by the public and the relevant competent authority before it makes its decision.” (Circ. 02/99, Paragraph 9). 1.11 The importance of scoping in the EIA process is highlighted in the Good Practice to the Preparation of Environmental Statements, produced by the Department of the Environment (1995). This states that: “Defining its scope is one of the most critical parts of an EIA in that it sets the context for what follows. If the scope is defined too narrowly, some critical areas of uncertainty or adverse impact may emerge late in the day. Decisions on the shape of the project may then be too far advanced to allow for any real change. On the other hand, if the scope of work is too loosely defined, then much time, effort and costs may be spent on pursuing unnecessary detail.” (Good Practice Guide, Paragraph 2.2). 1.12 Guidance on the content of a Scoping Report is provided in Circular 2/99, which states that it: “Should include a plan indicating the proposed location of the development, a brief description of the nature and purpose of the proposal and its possible environmental effects, giving a broad indication of the likely scale.” (Circular 2/99, Paragraph 55). 1.13 It further states that: “A developer may also wish to submit a draft outline of the ES, giving an indication of what he considers to be the main issues, to provide a focus for the local planning authorities considerations”. (Circular 2/99, Paragraph 90). 1.14 Regulation 8(1) of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 provides the applicant with the opportunity to seek a formal Scoping Opinion from the Commission. This Statement has been prepared for agreement with relevant statutory and other consultees on the scope of the environmental impact assessment. Other Supporting Documents 1.15 In addition to the ES, and in accordance with Regulation 5 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009, the planning application will be accompanied by: Southampton Scoping Statement v4.0 Page 5 September 2010 i A draft Development Consent Order, pursuant to Section 27 (3)(d) of ‘The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 and accompanied by an Explanatory Memorandum; ii A Book of Reference; iii A Flood Risk Assessment; iv A statement regarding Section 79(10) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990; v A Habitats Regulations Assessment Report; vi A Transport Assessment; vii A Travel Plan; viii A Statement of Community Consultation; ix A Community Consultation Strategy document; and x A Consultation Report. 1.16 The ES, or it’s appendices, will include the following plans, in accordance with Regulation 5 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009: i A land plan identifying the proposed location of the site; ii A land plan identifying the boundary of the site; iii A land plan identifying any statutory or non-statutory sites or features of nature conservation importance, habitats of protected species and water bodies within the South East River Basin Management Plan; iv A land plan identifying any statutory or non statutory sites or features of the historic environment; and v Indicative elevations of the proposed scheme. 1.17 The ES will refer to relevant parts of the reports listed in paragraph 1.10 and plans listed in paragraph 1.11 as appropriate. Programme 1.18 The applicant envisages that the application will be submitted to the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) in March 2011. Southampton Scoping Statement v4.0 Page 6 September 2010 2.0 CONSULTATION 2.1 The process of undertaking consultation assists in identifying the likely environmental and other effects of the proposed development, and enables the refinement of the project to incorporate appropriate mitigation measures to minimise adverse effects and maximise the positive effects of the scheme. Consultation with Section 42 Statutory Consultees 2.2 Helius Energy requested and attended an initial meeting with the IPC to introduce the project and discuss the pre-application procedures. In addition, Helius Energy has invited the IPC to visit the site, along with the key statutory consultees, as per the guidance contained in ‘Advice Note Three: Scoping opinion consultation’, published by the IPC in March 2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • D-Day Marshalling and Embarkation Areas
    SECOND WORLD WAR - D-Day Marshalling and Embarkation Areas 1. Operation Overlord From April 1944, the east-coast, the south and west coastal areas of England and parts of south Wales were divided into a number of concentration areas known as Marshalling Areas (MAs). One or more MAs served an Embarkation Area (EA). Preliminary planning as regards to the layout of each area had been worked out the previous year, such as exercise 'Harlequin' – carried out within the Sussex District and Central Sussex Sub- District during August and September 1943. By mid-March 1944, the Overlord Marshalling & Concentration Area plans were being finalised, this was called the 'Sausage Plan' on account of the shape given to the MA boundaries when identified on a map. Command Responsibilities Eastern Command was required to provide concentration areas for all troops passing through Tilbury and London Docks. This included an infantry division plus accumulated residues totalling 104,000 troops. Felixstowe and Tilbury Docks were each to be allocated one reinforcement holding unit of 1,600 troops and one reinforcement group of three units of 4,800 troops within the concentration area. Southern Command's primary responsibility was to provide concentration areas for US Forces by direct arrangement with SOS ETOUSA. This was in addition to two British armoured brigades located in the Bournemouth /Poole Area, and 21 Army Group. One reinforcement holding unit was also required to be accommodated in each of the Portsmouth and Southampton MAs. British Airborne Forces required tented accommodation for 800 (all ranks) at certain airfields within the command from which the forces would operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020
    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Database Results Hampshire
    Baker's Rithe, Hampshire Record ID 29 Authors Year Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 6926 1041 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Preserved timbers (oak and yew) on peat ledge. One oak stump in situ. Peat layer 0.15-0.26 m deep [thick?]. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available -1 m OD Yes Notes 14C details ID 12 Laboratory code R-24993/2 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description [-1 m OD] Oak stump Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3735 ± 60 BP 2310-1950 cal. BC Notes Stump BB Bibliographic reference Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 'Our changing coast; a survey of the intertidal archaeology of Langstone Harbour, Hampshire', Hampshire CBA Research Report 12.4 Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 86 Bury Farm (Bury Marshes), Hampshire Record ID 641 Authors Year Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 3820 1140 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available Yes Notes 14C details ID 491 Laboratory code Beta-93195 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description SU 3820 1140 -0.16 to -0.11 m OD Transgressive contact. Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3080 ± 60 BP 3394-3083 cal. BP Notes Dark brown humified peat with some turfa. Bibliographic reference Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 'Stratigraphic architecture, relative sea-level, and models of estuary development in southern England: new data from Southampton Water' in ' and estuarine environments: sedimentology, geomorphology and geoarchaeology', (ed.s) Pye, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02
    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • (Public) 17/09/2013, 17.00
    Public Document Pack CABINET DOCUMENTS FOR THE MEMBERS ROOM Tuesday, 17th September, 2013 at 5.00 pm MEMBERS ROOM DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO THE LISTED REPORTS Contacts Cabinet Administrator Judy Cordell Tel: 023 8083 2766 Email: [email protected] MEMBERS ROOM DOCUMENTS 14 HAMPSHIRE MINERALS AND WASTE PLAN: ADOPTION Inspectors’ report into the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (2013). Saved policies of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan (1998). Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (2007). Minerals and Waste Plan for adoption (2013). Inspector’s ‘Main Modifications’. Inspector’s ‘Additional Modifications’. Hampshire County Council’s Cabinet report. List of Southampton sites in background document potentially suitable for waste management facilities. Summary of consultation responses (2013). Monday, 9 September HEAD OF LEGAL , HR AND DEMOCRATIC SERVICES 2013 Agenda Item 14 Report to Hampshire County Council, Portsmouth City Council, Southampton City Council, New Forest National Park Authority and South Downs National Park Authority by Andrew S Freeman, BSc(Hons) DipTP DipEM FRTPI FCIHT MIEnvSc an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government rd Date : 23 May 2013 PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 (AS AMENDED) SECTION 20 REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION INTO THE HAMPSHIRE MINERALS AND WASTE PLAN LOCAL PLAN Document submitted for examination on 29 February 2012 Examination hearings held between 6 to 8 June 2012, 11 to 15 June 2012 and 13 to 14 March 2013 File Ref: PINS/Q1770/429/7 ABBREVIATIONS USED
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • HBIC Annual Monitoring Report 2018
    Monitoring Change in Priority Habitats, Priority Species and Designated Areas For Local Development Framework Annual Monitoring Reports 2018/19 (including breakdown by district) Basingstoke and Deane Eastleigh Fareham Gosport Havant Portsmouth Winchester Produced by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre December 2019 Sharing information about Hampshire's wildlife The Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Partnership includes local authorities, government agencies, wildlife charities and biological recording groups. Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre 2 Contents 1 Biodiversity Monitoring in Hampshire ................................................................................... 4 2 Priority habitats ....................................................................................................................... 7 3 Nature Conservation Designations ....................................................................................... 12 4 Priority habitats within Designated Sites .............................................................................. 13 5 Condition of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs)....................................................... 14 7. SINCs in Positive Management (SD 160) - Not reported on for 2018-19 .......................... 19 8 Changes in Notable Species Status over the period 2009 - 2019 ....................................... 20 09 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council .......................................................................... 28 10 Eastleigh Borough
    [Show full text]
  • BITTERNE AFTER the ROMANS. DOMESDAY Book Is Usually
    148 : HAMPSHIRE FIELD CLUB BITTERNE AFTER THE ROMANS. By O. G. S". CRAWFORD, B.A., F.S.A. OMESDAY Book is usually regarded as a measure of antiquity, conferring the hall-mark of authentic age upon such places D as are there mentioned. Bitterne is not mentioned by this name in Domesday, but the history of the manor can be traced back to before Domesday. In the year 1045 King "Edward the Confessor gave land at Stanham to the monastery of St. Peter and Paul at Winchester, that is to say, to the Cathedral. The bounds of this land are given ; their identification is not at all easy, but one thing is quite certain, namely, that they include a portion- of South Stoneham ; for an earlier grant of land (in 932).to-the new Minster at Winchester can be identified by the bounds with part of North Stoneham. We must therefore exclude all the land included in that earlier grant from the present one (of 1045). We may also exclude all manors known to exist at the time of Domesday, for it is highly improbable that any such would be included in the grant of a manor made only 41 years previously. That cuts out the manors of Allington, Woolston, Shirley and Chilworth. Unfor- tunately the exact extent of these manors is unknown, but the possible extent of the Stoneham grant is to some extent defined. The bounds begin at Swaythlihg well, which must have been somewhere near Swaythling. The " old Itchen " and the " new river " (niwan ea) are then mentioned, and then, after a number of unidentifiable bound-marks (loam-pits, Wadda's stoc, white stone) we come to " wic hythe." This last must mean the hithe or quay of the old Saxon town of Southampton, whose alternative names were Homwic and Horn- or Ham-tun.
    [Show full text]
  • (SLAA) - Hound/Netley and Hamble-Le-Rice
    Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) - Hound/Netley and Hamble-le-Rice Eastleigh Borough Boundary Parish Boundary SLAA-10-9-C SLAA-10-28-C SLAA-10-11-C SLAA-10-8-C SLAA-10-24-C SLAA-10-29-C SLAA-10-15-C SLAA-10-14-C SLAA-10-16-C SLAA-10-17-C SLAA-10-19-C SLAA-10-6-C SLAA-10-20-C SLAA-10-5-C SLAA-10-21-C SLAA-10-7-C SLAA-10-26-C SLAA-10-27-C SLAA-10-4-U SLAA-10-25-C SLAA-10-3-U SLAA-8-13-C SLAA-10-2-U SLAA-10-22-C SLAA-10-23-U SLAA-8-2-C SLAA-8-12-C SLAA-8-3-C SLAA-8-5-C SLAA-8-11-C SLAA-8-4-C SLAA-8-9-C SLAA-8-10-C SLAA-8-8-C © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey LA100019622 Not to Scale SITE REFERENCE: SLAA-10-2-U SIZE (ha): 0.32 SOURCE: EBC officers Net site area (ha): 0.32 ADDRESS: Rear gardens of 11-13 & 25-29 Sea View Estate & PARISH: Hound Orchard west of Sea View Estate, Netley Abbey REASON FOR ASSESSING: Identified from aerial photography for further consideration SITE DETAILS Site Description & Character of SurrounDing Area: The site is located on the eastern side of Netley Village Centre. It comprises of the residential curtilages of a number of properties on the Sea View Estate and a separate undeveloped parcel of land. The site does not currently have vehicular access to it.
    [Show full text]
  • 59 EDITORIAL. VOL. XVIII, Pt. 2, of the Proceedings Will Be Published In
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS " 59 EDITORIAL. OL. XVIII, Pt. 2, of the Proceedings will be published in July, 1953. It is hoped that this volume, which will include Vreviews of books received since 1950, notes of Field Meetings, and a list of those periodicals on the H.F.C. exchange list, will bring the Proceedings up to date, e.g., up to the end of 1952. Material intended for publication should be sent to the Hon. Editor, 10 The Close, Winchester. CORRESPONDENCE. THE STEAM PLOUGH IN HAMPSHIRE. Mr. Frank Warren writes concerning Mr. FusselFs article (Vol. XVII, p. 286) : " Richard Stratton of Broad Hinton, and Salthrop, Wiltshire (who lies buried in Winchester Cemetery), bought in 1859 the first Fowler steam plough for use on his farms. His son, James Stratton, came to farm Chilcombe, Winchester, in 1866 and introduced steam ploughing to Hampshire." CORRECTION. In the article on Hampshire Drawings in the Bodleian Library, Oxford, published in the Hampshire' Field Club Proceedings, Vol. XVII, page 139, the reference to the manuscript album should be " Western MSS. 17,507." PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 71 SUBJECT SECRETARIES' REPORTS. BIOLOGICAL SECTION. Weather 1951. " Deplorable" seems to be the only suitable adjective to describe the meteorological setting of the year 1951. Only once in the whole year, on July 2nd, did the temperature reach 80°, and on 18th, 20th and 28th of that month 79°. The highest shade temperatures in any other months were 75'5° on April 25th, 75° on September 6th, 74° on two days in June, the 5th and 21st, and on August 1st.
    [Show full text]
  • R1989 Vol 1 Chapter 8
    Environmental Statement for Port of Southampton: Main Channel Widening (Marchwood) Works Volume 1: Main Report 8. Physical Processes Executive Summary: Chapter 8. Physical Processes A package of technical evaluations, based on standard practice, has been used to determine the magnitude and extent of physical changes that are likely to result from the proposed dredging works. The assessment is based upon conservative assumptions to offer a realistic worst-case scenario. 1) Dispersion of Sediment during Dredging During dredging, heightened suspended sediment concentrations and a slight increase in sedimentation will occur due to local mechanical disturbance of sediments. The magnitude of the change, with respect to background conditions, is considered to be negligible to small. It is considered that these changes will not affect the physical functioning of the estuary. The impact on the estuary is therefore considered to be insignificant. Impacts on other receptors are considered elsewhere. 2) Bed Accumulation and Dispersion of Sediment during Disposal Modelling studies show that the deposit of the capital dredge sediments from the proposed dredging will be widely dispersed from the Nab Tower Deposit Ground, with all effects of the disposal returning to background conditions within one or two weeks after cessation of the disposal operations. The magnitude of the change is small, particularly given ongoing maintenance and capital dredge deposits at the site. Overall, the impact on physical functioning of the estuary is therefore considered to be insignificant. Impacts on other receptors are considered elsewhere. 3) Changes to Hydrodynamics Attributable to Dredging Only small changes in tidal range are anticipated, which are confined to the widening area.
    [Show full text]