DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents Section 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Section 7 NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 7 January 2006 Port of San Francisco Embarcadero Historic District Page 1 ============================================================================== TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 7 SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................. 10 ORGANIZATION OF SECTION 7 ............................................................................................. 12 CONTRIBUTING RESOURCES ................................................................................................ 13 SEAWALL ....................................................................................................................... 13 Description............................................................................................................ 14 History................................................................................................................... 16 BULKHEAD WHARF ..................................................................................................... 19 Introduction........................................................................................................... 19 Description................................................................................................ 19 History....................................................................................................... 23 Pier 45 Section ...................................................................................................... 26 Description................................................................................................ 26 Summary ........................................................................................... 26 Description ........................................................................................ 27 History....................................................................................................... 27 Section 2................................................................................................................ 28 Description................................................................................................ 28 Summary ........................................................................................... 28 Description ........................................................................................ 29 History....................................................................................................... 30 Section 3................................................................................................................ 32 Description................................................................................................ 32 Summary ........................................................................................... 32 Description ........................................................................................ 33 History....................................................................................................... 34 Section 4................................................................................................................ 36 Description................................................................................................ 37 Summary ........................................................................................... 37 Description ........................................................................................ 37 History....................................................................................................... 38 Section 5................................................................................................................ 40 Description................................................................................................ 40 NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 7 January 2006 Port of San Francisco Embarcadero Historic District Page 2 ============================================================================== Summary ........................................................................................... 40 Description ........................................................................................ 40 History....................................................................................................... 42 Section 6................................................................................................................ 45 Description................................................................................................ 45 Summary ........................................................................................... 45 Description ........................................................................................ 45 History....................................................................................................... 47 Section 7................................................................................................................ 49 Description................................................................................................ 49 Summary ........................................................................................... 49 Description ........................................................................................ 49 History....................................................................................................... 51 Section 8a.............................................................................................................. 53 Description................................................................................................ 53 Summary ........................................................................................... 53 Description ........................................................................................ 53 History....................................................................................................... 54 Section 8b.............................................................................................................. 56 Description................................................................................................ 56 Summary ........................................................................................... 56 Description ........................................................................................ 57 History....................................................................................................... 58 Section 8................................................................................................................ 63 Description................................................................................................ 63 Summary and Description ................................................................. 63 History....................................................................................................... 63 Section 9................................................................................................................ 65 Description................................................................................................ 66 Summary ........................................................................................... 66 Description ........................................................................................ 66 History....................................................................................................... 67 Section 10.............................................................................................................. 68 Description................................................................................................ 68 Summary ........................................................................................... 68 Description ........................................................................................ 68 History....................................................................................................... 69 NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 7 January 2006 Port of San Francisco Embarcadero Historic District Page 3 ============================================================================== Section 11a............................................................................................................ 70 Description................................................................................................ 71 Summary ........................................................................................... 71 Description ........................................................................................ 71 History....................................................................................................... 72 Section 11.............................................................................................................. 73 Description...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 39 April 2008 Number 3 the Presi
    ______________________________________________________________________________ VOLUME 39 APRIL 2008 NUMBER 3 INDEX TO THIS ISSUE days of lively, interactive sessions were again superbly chaired by Professor Weiss PRESIDENT’S CORNER…………...….....……….Page 1 and the SMA’s Austin Dooley, PhD. THE HIDDEN TRUTH……………………...….….Page 2 Also in February, NYMAR put on a D.G.HARMONY DECISION……….……….……..Page 3 vivid afternoon lecture/discussion by simu- ANDREW J. BARBERI DECISION……………….Page 5 lating the COSCO BUSAN accident (alli- sion with a bridge in San Francisco Bay and THE APPLICATION OF COGSA TIME BAR IN NEW YORK ARBITRATION………..….Page 7 subsequent oil spill) as having taken place in A COMMERCIAL MAN……...…………….……..Page 9 New York harbor: How prepared would New York be? The US Coast Guard CLEAN SHIPS…………………………...………..Page 12 (USCG) representatives from the New York HALL STREET V. MATTEL – EXPANDED JUDICIAL REVIEW…………………….…..Page 16 and New Jersey environmental agencies (EPA), spill responders, P&I Club, port au- SMA LUNCHEON SPEECHES…………......……Page 16 thority, pilot association, Owner and Char- OIL SPILL RESPONSE UPDATE..…………..…..Page 17 terer’s representatives all made this frighten- SMA WORKSHOP REPORT……….…….………Page 19 ingly real, but demonstrating that New York PUBLISH WE DO!...................................................Page 20 would be prepared to deal with such a mess, (MORE ON) SMA AWARDS……..………………Page 21 literally speaking. Further details on both BOOK REVIEW………………………..………….Page 21 events are provided in this issue. PEOPLE AND PLACES……………….………….Page 21 Then in March the whole shipping SOME PERSONAL NOTES………………………Page 23 world, at least so it seemed, came together in Stamford for CMA’s Shipping 2008 Confer- IN MEMORIAM – Neil J. Carey..…………...……Page 23 ence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phoenix Tech Story
    THE PHOENIX TECH STORY How talent, a pro-business environment and quality of life are shaping the Phoenix tech scene TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 03 05 The Phoenix The Tech Population Workforce Tech Story Sector and Phoenix Roots 07 11 13 17 19 21 Workforce Education Cost of Doing Quality of Taxes Regulatory Business Life Policy THE PHOENIX TECH STORY 01 ©2018 GPEC & CBRE, INC. 02 >> This report examines the Phoenix value proposition to tech companies and how Phoenix compares to some of the most dynamic tech cities in the country. Although companies continue to operate—and in some cases, expand—in established markets such as the Bay Area, New York, Washington, D.C., and Seattle, rising costs and intense competition for talent have continued to motivate business leaders to consider alternative locations. The most competitive alternative locations are generally smaller, have a strong talent pool and business-friendly environment and also offer a high quality THE PHOENIX TECH STORY THE PHOENIX of life. Phoenix is an attractive place, not just because of its competitive advantage with regard to cost, but because of its deep talent pool; existing and growing portfolio of tech companies, universities and tech resources; and quality of life. Testimonials “Fueled by a diverse, motivated talent pool “For nearly two decades, University and an excellent transportation hub.” of Advancing Technology (UAT) has been committed to producing the best Bruce Hoechner cybersecurity talent in the world. This next CEO, Rogers Corporation generation of cyber warriors
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3-‐1 Historic Resources Evaluation
    Appendix 3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION SEAWALL LOT 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project San Francisco, California April 11, 2016 Prepared by San Francisco, California Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall Lot 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project, San Francisco, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 1 III. Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 IV. Property Description ................................................................................................... ….....6 V. Historical Context ....................................................................................................... ….....24 VI. Determination of Eligibility.................................................................................... ……....44 VII. Evaluation of the Project for Compliance with the Standards ............................. 45 VIII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 58 IX. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 59 April 11, 2016 Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You for Choosing Smart Destinations. Remember to Print Your
    Attraction Guide (866) 628-9028 Thank you for choosing Smart Destinations. IMPORTANT: This packet contains your printable admission passes. Each person for whom you have purchased a pass will have a single unique SCANNABLE CODE. The code is your Go San Francisco Card. This code is REQUIRED for admission to each attraction. You MUST print it and have it with you. Remember to RETAIN it after each scan for use at the next attraction. How to use your GO San Francisco Card (with scannable code): You must present your Go San Francisco Card for admission at every attraction you visit. The FIRST time you use your Go San Francisco Card at an attraction, your card will be ACTIVATED. It is important to remember that your Go San Francisco Card is valid for the number of calendar days purchased (not 24-hour periods) and can be used for entry until 5:30 pm on each of the valid days. The included attraction guide contains valuable information about how to gain entry to each of the attractions, and also, how to use your pass to access the special discounts on shopping and dining. Keep an eye out for special icons: Each attraction and special o!er has a color-coded and numbered locator, which will help you locate it on the map provided. Included Reservations A colored circle on the maps and next to the name indicates the type 1 Attraction required of attraction it is and the number corresponds to the maps. The colored squares indicate special conditions for visiting the attraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    April 2017 Section 4.D. Cultural Resources 4.D CULTURAL RESOURCES This section discusses the potential of the proposed Mission Rock Project to adversely affect cultural resources. The section describes the applicable regulatory and environmental setting for cultural resources within and around the project site, and analyzes the project’s potential to adversely affect cultural resources, including historical resources, archeological resources, and human remains. The City and County of San Francisco (City) received one comment related to cultural resources in response to the notice of preparation (NOP) (Appendix 1) asking for an evaluation of potential impacts to submerged cultural resources in the project area. This section is based on the background information, historical resource evaluations, and information regarding potential project impacts on historical and other cultural resources provided in the following documents: Historic Resource Evaluation, Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project, San Francisco, California (HRE);1 the associated Historic Resource Evaluation Response prepared by the Planning Department;2 Geoarcheological Assessment for the Seawall Lot 337/Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project (Geoarcheological Assessment);3 and the Environmental Planning Preliminary Archeological Review: Checklist for the Mission Rock Pier 48 and Seawall Lot 337 Project (PAR).4 These reports are included as Appendix 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3, 3-4, respectively. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project site’s environmental setting consists of the prehistoric and historical context for as yet unidentified archeological resources and a description of known historical resources within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) study area. For purposes of this analysis, the study area includes the project site and a surrounding one-block radius (approximately 0.1 mile) of the project site.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferry Terminal San Francisco Transit Information
    Sidney Walton Park Pier 3 TransitJ A C K S O N S T Stops Paradas del tránsito 公車站地圖 Pier 1 To Fisherman’s Wharf Golden Gateway Center Tiburon Transit WASHINGTON ST 200 Vallejo SAN FRANCISCO B A T T E R Y S T Information Gate B Vallejo BAY 5 Maritime Sue Bierman - Plaza Park ® Larkspur/Sausalito 1 F Y E R R Ferry Terminal M Ferry Building I F Gates C L AY S T N San Francisco D R U M M S T C&D To Chinatown Three Four U One Two Embarcadero Embarcadero Embarcadero Embarcadero Center Center T Map Key Center Center Justin 1•41•82X 41•82X F E You Are Here Herman Alameda/Oakland Plaza 1000-Foot (305m) Radius F R O N T S T Thruway D A V I S S T W (ve minute walk) S A C R A M E N T O S T Alameda Harbor Bay BART Train A Bus (Motor Coach, Trolley Coach) Owl Owl L 6•21•31•L •N Gate E Cable Car 2 K Hyatt South San Francisco Ferry California Regency F 41•82X One Market Historic Streetcar C A L I F O R N I A S T Plaza THE EMBARCADERO Thruway Metro Light Rail A1 14•14X•NOwl Amtrak Major Transit Terminal 31AX•31BX•38BX F Ofce B1 Market Street Transit Stop 1AX•1BX•38AX Railway Museum Underground Station Pier 14 14•14L•14X•30X•41•82X Hotel Vitale A1 Station Entrance/Exit A2 2•4•8•18•24 B2 14 Station Elevator Spear P I N E S T Tower Ferry Tickets A3 Embarcadero Station Transit Information 9•9L Inside Embarcadero Station: S T E U A R T S T B3 EM, FE, TT-B SFO & East Bay Stations 14•14X Transit Lines One 14L Front Metro J•K•L•M•N•T Rincon Center San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni) Bldg Cable Car Historic Streetcar California Street F Market and Wharves B
    [Show full text]
  • Three Bear Hut Natalie Coffin Greene Park Ross, California
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION Three Bear Hut Natalie Coffin Greene Park Ross, California April 27, 2016 Prepared by Historic Resource Evaluation Three Bear Hut, Ross, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 2 III. Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 2 IV. Property Description ....................................................................................... ….….….......2 V. Historical Context ........................................................................................ ….…….............8 VI. Determination of Eligibility.............................................................................. ….…..…...21 VII. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 24 VIII. Bibliography ...................................................................................................................... 25 IX. Appendix ............................................................................................................................. 28 A. Plate II D-1 from the National Park Service Publication: Park and Recreation Structures (1938) B. Deed, Grant and Reservation of Easements and
    [Show full text]
  • State City/County Project Improvement Amount Wilcox Gee's Bend
    State City/County Project Improvement Amount Upgrade ferry lines and Alabama Wilcox Gee’s Bend Ferry build new terminal at $1,419,000 Camden Replacement of aging Alaska Hoonah Hoonah Ferry structures to allow for safer $3,059,507 and more reliable service Replace aging tugboats to Arkansas Marion Peel Ferry provide safer and more $350,000 reliable service Ferry landing California San Francisco Sausalito Ferry improvements to include $3,200,000 better access Terminal improvements to Florida Duval Mayport Ferry include ramp upgrades for $3,000,000 safety Georgia Chatham Savannah River Ferry Construct new ferry boat $1,000,000 Construction and rehabilitation of ferry Kentucky Crittenden Cave-in-Rock Ferry $90,000 landing to reduce service delays Turkey Neck Bend Replace aging ferry and Kentucky Monroe $300,000 Ferry trailer Kentucky Butler Reeds Ferry Construct new ferry boat $300,000 Improve landing Plaquemine/Sunshine infrastructure with Louisiana Iberville $350,000 Ferry upgraded hydraulic systems Replace ferry boat engines with energy- Plaquemines Parish efficient/alternative fuel Louisiana Plaquemines $1,856,930 Ferry engines that improve speed and reduce emissions Replace main engine of Plaquemine/Sunshine M/V Ascension ferry boat Louisiana Iberville $650,000 Ferry to improve speed, efficiency and reliability M/V Acadia, M/V Replace navigational radar Iberville, Pointe Ascension, M/V St. systems on the four ferry Louisiana Coupee, and West Charles, M/V St. $300,000 boats to improve safety Feliciana Parishes Francisville Radar and efficiency
    [Show full text]
  • Ports Handbook for Orkney 6Th Edition CONTENTS
    Ports Handbook for Orkney 6th Edition CONTENTS General Contact Details 4 Introduction 5 Orkney Harbour Authority Area Map 6 Pilotage Services & Pilotage Index to PIERS & HARBOURS 45 Exemption Certificates 7 Main Piers Data 46-47 Orkney VTS 8 Piers: Reporting Points 9 Burray 48-49 Radar & AIS Coverage 10-11 Burwick 50-51 Port Passage Planning 12 Backaland 52-53 Suggested tracks Egilsay 54-55 Scapa Flow, Kirkwall, Stromness 13-15 Gibraltar 56-57 Prior notification requirements 16 Sutherland 58-59 Preparations for Port Entry 17 Graemsay 60-61 Harbour Craft 18 Holm 62-63 Port Security - (ISPS code) 19 Houton 64-65 Port Health 20 Longhope 66-67 Port Medical Officers Services 21 Lyness 68-71 Port Waste Reception Facilities 22 Moaness 72-73 Traffic Movements in Orkney 23 Kirkwall 74-78 Ferry Routes in & around Orkney 24 Hatston 79-83 Fishing Vessel Facilities 25 Hatston Slipway 84-85 Diving Support Boats 26 Nouster 86-87 Principal Wreck & Dive Sites Moclett 88-89 in Scapa Flow 27 Trumland 90-91 Towage & Tugs 28-31 Kettletoft 92-93 Ship to Ship Cargo Transhipments 32 Loth 94-95 Flotta Oil Terminal 34-38 Scapa 96-97 Guide to good practice for small Scapa Flow 98-99 vessel bunkering operations 39 Balfour 100-101 Guide to good practice for the Stromness 102-106 disposal of waste materials 40 Copland’s Dock 107-111 Fixed Navigation lights 41-44 Pole Star 112-113 Stronsay 114-115 Whitehall 116-117 Tingwall 118-119 Marinas 126-130 Pierowall 120-121 Tidal Atlas 131-144 Rapness 122-123 Pollution Prevention Guidelines 145 Wyre 124-125 2 3 PORTS HANDBOOK – 6TH EDITION The Orkney County Council Act of 1974 As a Harbour Authority, the Council’s aim, authorised the Orkney Islands Council through Marine Services, is to ensure that to exercise jurisdiction as a Statutory Orkney’s piers and harbours are operated Harbour Authority and defined the in a safe and cost effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Martha's Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan 2020–2040
    Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan 2020–2040 July 2019 Prepared by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission and the Martha’s Vineyard Joint Transportation Committee in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, and Massachusetts Department of Transportation Martha’s Vineyard MPO / Joint Transportation Committee c/o The Martha’s Vineyard Commission P.O. Box 1447 Oak Bluffs, MA 02557 Phone: 508-693-3453 Fax: 508-693-7894 The preparation of the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Please note: All maps are included in this RTP for illustrative purposes only, and are available in higher quality from the MVC staff if requested. Cover (clockwise from top right): A Steamship Authority ferry docking in Vineyard Haven, taxis staging at the Vineyard Haven Terminal, bicyclists along Ocean Drive in Oak Bluffs, solar canopies at Cronig’s Market in West Tisbury. Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan 2020–2040 July 2019 CONTENTS Participants and Endorsement 1 Executive Summary 3 Transportation Planning Organizations 5 Section 1: Transportation Systems at a Glance 6 Woods Hole, Martha’s
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Emergency-Response Services After the Earthquake
    THE LOMA PRIETA, CALIFORNIA, EARTHQUAKE OF OCTOBER 17,1989: STRONG GROUND MOTION AND GROUND FAILURE MARINA DISTRICT PERFORMANCE OF EMERGENCY-RESPONSE SERVICES AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE By Charles R. Scawthom and Keith A. Porter, EQE Engineering and Design; and Frank T. Blackbum, PWSS Co., Ltd. CONTENTS rary loss of computer-aided dispatch. A fire that grew to near-conflagration proportions demonstrated both the strengths and weaknesses of emergency response. The fire- Page F195 boat Phoenix, the San Francisco Fire Department's Porta- Intr&uction ................................................................ 195 ble Water Supply System, and the tactics and training for The Marina District before the earthquake ........................... 195 using them were critical in controlling the fire. In contrast, San Francisco Police Department ...................................... 196 the city's Auxiliary Water Supply System was poorly uti- San Francisco Fire Department ......................................... 196 lized because of overwhelmed procedures for emergency San Francisco Department of Public Health, Paramedic 200 operations, communication, and command and control. Earthquake damage in the Marina District ........................... 200 SmD response --------A ................................................... 202 SFFD response ............................................................ 202 INTRODUCTION First response: Building collapse at 2 Cervantes 202 The earthquake severely tested the preparedness of emer- 202 gency-response services throughout the San Francisco Bay 203 area. San Francisco itself sustained moderate to strong ground shaking, with intensities ranging from VI to IX on 203 205 the modified Mercalli intensity (MMI) scale (Benuska, 205 1990). The most severe damage occurred in the Marina 206 District, an area of approximately % mi2 with 14,000 resi- 206 dents at the end of the San Francisco peninsula. This area, 206 assigned an MMI of IX by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sffd | New Fire Boat Station 35 at Pier 22.5
    SFFD | NEW FIRE BOAT STATION 35 AT PIER 22.5 MARITIME COMMERCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE – SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 BAYSIDE CONFERENCE ROOM, PIER 1, THE EMBARCADERO, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 AGENDA: • ESER 2014 Background • Site and Project History • Design-Build Procurement • Project Approach Building Design & Construction NEW FIRE BOAT STATION 35 AT PIER 22.5 Project Management Maritime Commerce Advisory Committee | September 21, 2017 1 ESER 2014 BACKGROUND ESER Program Project Map $400M General Obligation Bond authorized in June 2014 with approval by 79% of voters • Neighborhood Fire Stations $85M • Emergency Firefighting Water System $55M • District Police Stations and Infrastructure $30M • Motorcycle Police and Crime Lab $165M • Medical Examiner Facility $65M Building Design & Construction NEW FIRE BOAT STATION 35 AT PIER 22.5 Project Management Maritime Commerce Advisory Committee | September 21, 2017 2 COLLABORATION AMONG CITY DEPARTMENTS Building Design & Construction NEW FIRE BOAT STATION 35 AT PIER 22.5 Project Management Maritime Commerce Advisory Committee | September 21, 2017 3 PARTNERING Partnering Level 3 • External Professional Neutral Facilitator • Kick-off Partnering Workshop • Partnering Charter and Mission Statement • Partnering Sessions • Design Phase • Construction Phase • Executive Group • From senior most levels of City and Design-Builder organizations • Stakeholder Group • Resolution Ladder • Quarterly Project Scorecards • International Partnering Institute Members • San Francisco Public Works • Swinerton Builders • “A Mini
    [Show full text]