DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 39 April 2008 Number 3 the Presi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 39 April 2008 Number 3 the Presi ______________________________________________________________________________ VOLUME 39 APRIL 2008 NUMBER 3 INDEX TO THIS ISSUE days of lively, interactive sessions were again superbly chaired by Professor Weiss PRESIDENT’S CORNER…………...….....……….Page 1 and the SMA’s Austin Dooley, PhD. THE HIDDEN TRUTH……………………...….….Page 2 Also in February, NYMAR put on a D.G.HARMONY DECISION……….……….……..Page 3 vivid afternoon lecture/discussion by simu- ANDREW J. BARBERI DECISION……………….Page 5 lating the COSCO BUSAN accident (alli- sion with a bridge in San Francisco Bay and THE APPLICATION OF COGSA TIME BAR IN NEW YORK ARBITRATION………..….Page 7 subsequent oil spill) as having taken place in A COMMERCIAL MAN……...…………….……..Page 9 New York harbor: How prepared would New York be? The US Coast Guard CLEAN SHIPS…………………………...………..Page 12 (USCG) representatives from the New York HALL STREET V. MATTEL – EXPANDED JUDICIAL REVIEW…………………….…..Page 16 and New Jersey environmental agencies (EPA), spill responders, P&I Club, port au- SMA LUNCHEON SPEECHES…………......……Page 16 thority, pilot association, Owner and Char- OIL SPILL RESPONSE UPDATE..…………..…..Page 17 terer’s representatives all made this frighten- SMA WORKSHOP REPORT……….…….………Page 19 ingly real, but demonstrating that New York PUBLISH WE DO!...................................................Page 20 would be prepared to deal with such a mess, (MORE ON) SMA AWARDS……..………………Page 21 literally speaking. Further details on both BOOK REVIEW………………………..………….Page 21 events are provided in this issue. PEOPLE AND PLACES……………….………….Page 21 Then in March the whole shipping SOME PERSONAL NOTES………………………Page 23 world, at least so it seemed, came together in Stamford for CMA’s Shipping 2008 Confer- IN MEMORIAM – Neil J. Carey..…………...……Page 23 ence. And let us not forget the many visiting firemen (an expression for lawyers, barris- THE PRESIDENT’S CORNER ters, arbitrators and/or other shipping digni- taries from abroad or far away) to keep our Easter has come and gone and so has lunch tabs running. Spring, even if only as a calendar date, it is What’s ahead: first of all, we are barely April and events have been and are planning a fancy birthday party for our- th keeping up a fast pace. selves. It is the SMA’s 45 anniversary and The fourth annual SMA seminar on we aim to celebrate in style. The date is “Maritime Arbitration in New York under September 24 and the venue is the Union SMA Rules” in February had a majority of League Club. More details will follow. foreign attendees, including London, Nige- Then there is Maritime Americas Week ria, Venezuela and Mexico (we had two last 2008 in Miami in May (an annual event, but minute cancellations – isn’t it ever so frus- apparently this being the first), at which trating when business gets in the way). Two SMA members will participate in a Mock 2 THE ARBITRATOR APRIL 2008 Arbitration in conjunction with Petro- the England manager took a lot of stick for spot/IBIA’s Bunker Arbitration Experience, that umbrella. He let the fuss die down for a dealing with bunker related dispute issues. couple of months before then ruining every- We also hear that the busy people thing by claiming that he had only used the running NYMAR are working on another umbrella to keep his notebook dry. Reckon. afternoon seminar sometime between now All sorts of people are susceptible to and June. Finally, keep planning on attend- this foot-in-mouth syndrome. A barrister ing ICMA XVII in Hamburg, October 2009. who should have known better once told an I encourage the membership to par- ICMA meeting that it was not a good idea ticipate in these interesting events. Watch for London maritime arbitrators to publish our website and stay tuned, but in the mean- their awards because this would lead to “a time enjoy the spring, if and when it actually proliferation of citations of authority.” You shows up. try proliferating nothing. Then he com- pounded it by saying that publication had to Klaus Mordhorst be in a user-friendly format. Fat chance. The only vaguely comparable gaffe is that committed by a soldier in the British THE HIDDEN TRUTH armed forces who, some years ago, was by Chris Hewer court-martialed for coming back to barracks after lights-out, climbing in through his hut Roughly 95 per cent of people in window, and falling into bed in a drunken the world claim that they have never told a stupor with a lit cigarette still in his mouth, lie. That figure is official: 95 per cent, mind. thereby setting fire to the bed and to the en- But it depends on your definition of a lie. Do tire hut. His subsequent plea in court was, you favour “gross falsification or misrepre- “Not guilty, m’lud. The bed was already on sentation of the facts, with constant repeti- fire when I got into it.” tion and embellishment to lend credibility?” Obfuscation (let us call it that, for Or do you prefer the old English maxim, want of a better word, although heaven “Liar, liar, pants on fire?” knows there must be thousands) has reached American author Steven Covey once new heights of sophistication in the elec- said, “When you make a mistake, admit it, tronic age. At this very moment there is correct it, and learn from it – immediately.” somebody trying to hawk an “enterprise- Easier said than done. wide application for metadata removal and There is a fine line between telling a metadata management in law firms which lie and just giving voice to what you hope is uses sophisticated technologies to remove the truth and then not knowing when to stop. visible metadata and clean the hidden or dif- Take the former manager of the England ficult-to-reach file elements.” football team (nobody else has snapped him Oh, that old metadata chestnut, you up yet), who last year stood on the touchline are probably thinking. And you’d be right. protecting his lovingly created hairstyle un- For those who did not know, metadata is der a huge umbrella while watching his side data about data. The word ‘meta’ comes being eliminated from the European Cham- from the Greek, where it means ‘after’ or pionships. ‘beyond’. In epistemology, the prefix ‘meta’ Real football managers don’t stand is used to mean ‘about’, which just happens under umbrellas. They wear cheesecutters, to be a word that causes more trouble in and stand out in the rain. Not surprisingly, 3 THE ARBITRATOR APRIL 2008 shipping disputes than any other, and is by COGSA LIABILITY / no means exclusive to the Greeks. DG HARMONY But enough of that. The product on offer allows law firms the luxury of not hav- The following case summary ap- ing to “worry about file formats leaving peared in the Blank Rome March 2008 their electronic walls.” That’s a relief. And newsletter. it has an “email integration capability to prevent the inadvertent release of confiden- Second Circuit Decision Affects COGSA tial information.” The product can “require Liability for Shipment of Dangerous users to clean all documents sent outside the Cargo firm as part of a non-invasive automated On March 3, 2008, the United States workflow process.” Tidy. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in If we are reading this right, lawyers In re M/V DG HARMONY, 2008 U.S. App. are being offered an electronic means of, at LEXIS 4483, No. 05-6116-cv (2d Cir. best, keeping secrets, and, at worst, covering March 3, 2008), issued an important deci- up their mistakes. The days of dumping a sion which clarifies the standard used to de- job lot of lever-arch files in the East River termine the liability of shippers and carriers are clearly long gone. The environment ex- transporting hazardous cargo under the Car- hales. But does it help us choose the right riage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”), 46 lawyer? U.S.C. § 30701 note. Just the other day, an American law- Under the holding of this case, a yer sent out a press release telling the world shipper will not be held strictly liable for what to look for when hiring an attorney. damage caused by hazardous goods if both Among other things, this cautioned, “It is the shipper and the carrier had pre-shipment important to meet the lawyer, if possible, in knowledge of the dangerous nature of the the office. The client should see where the cargo, even if the carrier lacked information lawyer works. Observe the feel of the office about the precise characteristics of the cargo to see if it will be a good fit. There are no and its hazards. Instead, in such a case the secrets or surprises here.” And, oh yes, shipper’s liability will be determined on “Handshakes and a wink are not accept- negligence principles. In particular, where able.” the carrier alleges that the shipper failed This is all good advice, even though adequately to warn the carrier about the many of us grew up believing – and still be- characteristics of the particular shipment, the lieve – that handshakes, at least, are per- carrier must show (1) that the shipper had a fectly acceptable. A wink, meanwhile, is as duty to warn because the cargo presented good as a nod to a blind horse. But as for ‘no dangers of which the carrier could not rea- secrets and surprises’, what about those de- sonably have been expected to be aware, (2) leted files? What lies behind those electronic that the shipper failed to provide the ade- walls? What about the non-invasive auto- quate warning, and (3) that this failure mated workflow process? What about the caused the damage complained of.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 3-‐1 Historic Resources Evaluation
    Appendix 3-1 Historic Resources Evaluation HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION SEAWALL LOT 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project San Francisco, California April 11, 2016 Prepared by San Francisco, California Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall Lot 337 & Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project, San Francisco, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 1 III. Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 IV. Property Description ................................................................................................... ….....6 V. Historical Context ....................................................................................................... ….....24 VI. Determination of Eligibility.................................................................................... ……....44 VII. Evaluation of the Project for Compliance with the Standards ............................. 45 VIII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 58 IX. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 59 April 11, 2016 Historic Resource Evaluation Seawall
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    April 2017 Section 4.D. Cultural Resources 4.D CULTURAL RESOURCES This section discusses the potential of the proposed Mission Rock Project to adversely affect cultural resources. The section describes the applicable regulatory and environmental setting for cultural resources within and around the project site, and analyzes the project’s potential to adversely affect cultural resources, including historical resources, archeological resources, and human remains. The City and County of San Francisco (City) received one comment related to cultural resources in response to the notice of preparation (NOP) (Appendix 1) asking for an evaluation of potential impacts to submerged cultural resources in the project area. This section is based on the background information, historical resource evaluations, and information regarding potential project impacts on historical and other cultural resources provided in the following documents: Historic Resource Evaluation, Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed-Use Development Project, San Francisco, California (HRE);1 the associated Historic Resource Evaluation Response prepared by the Planning Department;2 Geoarcheological Assessment for the Seawall Lot 337/Pier 48 Mixed-Use Project (Geoarcheological Assessment);3 and the Environmental Planning Preliminary Archeological Review: Checklist for the Mission Rock Pier 48 and Seawall Lot 337 Project (PAR).4 These reports are included as Appendix 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3, 3-4, respectively. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project site’s environmental setting consists of the prehistoric and historical context for as yet unidentified archeological resources and a description of known historical resources within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) study area. For purposes of this analysis, the study area includes the project site and a surrounding one-block radius (approximately 0.1 mile) of the project site.
    [Show full text]
  • State City/County Project Improvement Amount Wilcox Gee's Bend
    State City/County Project Improvement Amount Upgrade ferry lines and Alabama Wilcox Gee’s Bend Ferry build new terminal at $1,419,000 Camden Replacement of aging Alaska Hoonah Hoonah Ferry structures to allow for safer $3,059,507 and more reliable service Replace aging tugboats to Arkansas Marion Peel Ferry provide safer and more $350,000 reliable service Ferry landing California San Francisco Sausalito Ferry improvements to include $3,200,000 better access Terminal improvements to Florida Duval Mayport Ferry include ramp upgrades for $3,000,000 safety Georgia Chatham Savannah River Ferry Construct new ferry boat $1,000,000 Construction and rehabilitation of ferry Kentucky Crittenden Cave-in-Rock Ferry $90,000 landing to reduce service delays Turkey Neck Bend Replace aging ferry and Kentucky Monroe $300,000 Ferry trailer Kentucky Butler Reeds Ferry Construct new ferry boat $300,000 Improve landing Plaquemine/Sunshine infrastructure with Louisiana Iberville $350,000 Ferry upgraded hydraulic systems Replace ferry boat engines with energy- Plaquemines Parish efficient/alternative fuel Louisiana Plaquemines $1,856,930 Ferry engines that improve speed and reduce emissions Replace main engine of Plaquemine/Sunshine M/V Ascension ferry boat Louisiana Iberville $650,000 Ferry to improve speed, efficiency and reliability M/V Acadia, M/V Replace navigational radar Iberville, Pointe Ascension, M/V St. systems on the four ferry Louisiana Coupee, and West Charles, M/V St. $300,000 boats to improve safety Feliciana Parishes Francisville Radar and efficiency
    [Show full text]
  • Ports Handbook for Orkney 6Th Edition CONTENTS
    Ports Handbook for Orkney 6th Edition CONTENTS General Contact Details 4 Introduction 5 Orkney Harbour Authority Area Map 6 Pilotage Services & Pilotage Index to PIERS & HARBOURS 45 Exemption Certificates 7 Main Piers Data 46-47 Orkney VTS 8 Piers: Reporting Points 9 Burray 48-49 Radar & AIS Coverage 10-11 Burwick 50-51 Port Passage Planning 12 Backaland 52-53 Suggested tracks Egilsay 54-55 Scapa Flow, Kirkwall, Stromness 13-15 Gibraltar 56-57 Prior notification requirements 16 Sutherland 58-59 Preparations for Port Entry 17 Graemsay 60-61 Harbour Craft 18 Holm 62-63 Port Security - (ISPS code) 19 Houton 64-65 Port Health 20 Longhope 66-67 Port Medical Officers Services 21 Lyness 68-71 Port Waste Reception Facilities 22 Moaness 72-73 Traffic Movements in Orkney 23 Kirkwall 74-78 Ferry Routes in & around Orkney 24 Hatston 79-83 Fishing Vessel Facilities 25 Hatston Slipway 84-85 Diving Support Boats 26 Nouster 86-87 Principal Wreck & Dive Sites Moclett 88-89 in Scapa Flow 27 Trumland 90-91 Towage & Tugs 28-31 Kettletoft 92-93 Ship to Ship Cargo Transhipments 32 Loth 94-95 Flotta Oil Terminal 34-38 Scapa 96-97 Guide to good practice for small Scapa Flow 98-99 vessel bunkering operations 39 Balfour 100-101 Guide to good practice for the Stromness 102-106 disposal of waste materials 40 Copland’s Dock 107-111 Fixed Navigation lights 41-44 Pole Star 112-113 Stronsay 114-115 Whitehall 116-117 Tingwall 118-119 Marinas 126-130 Pierowall 120-121 Tidal Atlas 131-144 Rapness 122-123 Pollution Prevention Guidelines 145 Wyre 124-125 2 3 PORTS HANDBOOK – 6TH EDITION The Orkney County Council Act of 1974 As a Harbour Authority, the Council’s aim, authorised the Orkney Islands Council through Marine Services, is to ensure that to exercise jurisdiction as a Statutory Orkney’s piers and harbours are operated Harbour Authority and defined the in a safe and cost effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Martha's Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan 2020–2040
    Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan 2020–2040 July 2019 Prepared by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission and the Martha’s Vineyard Joint Transportation Committee in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, and Massachusetts Department of Transportation Martha’s Vineyard MPO / Joint Transportation Committee c/o The Martha’s Vineyard Commission P.O. Box 1447 Oak Bluffs, MA 02557 Phone: 508-693-3453 Fax: 508-693-7894 The preparation of the Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Please note: All maps are included in this RTP for illustrative purposes only, and are available in higher quality from the MVC staff if requested. Cover (clockwise from top right): A Steamship Authority ferry docking in Vineyard Haven, taxis staging at the Vineyard Haven Terminal, bicyclists along Ocean Drive in Oak Bluffs, solar canopies at Cronig’s Market in West Tisbury. Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan 2020–2040 July 2019 CONTENTS Participants and Endorsement 1 Executive Summary 3 Transportation Planning Organizations 5 Section 1: Transportation Systems at a Glance 6 Woods Hole, Martha’s
    [Show full text]
  • Martha's Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan 2020–2040
    Martha’s Vineyard Regional Transportation Plan 2020–2040 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW June 23, 2019 Notes: The section on public outreach will be completed following the public review. The sections on financial constraints and proposed projects will be completed based on discussions with the Joint Transportation Committee. Underlined sections indicate information that was unavailable as of this draft. An earlier draft of this plan was approved by the Joint Transportation Committee on June 19, 2019. 1 Contents Participants and Endorsement Executive Summary (10) Transportation Planning Organizations (13) Section 1: Transportation Systems at a Glance (14) Woods Hole, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority Martha’s Vineyard Airport Roads and Automobiles Vineyard Transit Authority Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Section 2: RTP Guidance and Process (15) Federal Legislation MAP-21 and FAST Act Title VI and Environmental Justice State Legislation and Guidance Regional Planning weMove Massachusetts GreetDOT Policy Directive Greenhouse Gas Analysis Metropolitan Planning Organizations and the Global Warming Solutions Act Regional Greenhouse Gas Tracking and Evaluation in RTPs Planning and Outreach Performance Measures for Martha’s Vineyard Criteria for Project Prioritization Section 3: Martha’s Vineyard Overview (22) Introduction Demographics Population Age and Gender Population Projections Economy Economic Development Locations Notes on the Seasonal Economy Establishments and Employees Income and Earnings Housing and Seasonality Land
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Section 7
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 7 January 2006 Port of San Francisco Embarcadero Historic District Page 1 ============================================================================== TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 7 SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................. 10 ORGANIZATION OF SECTION 7 ............................................................................................. 12 CONTRIBUTING RESOURCES ................................................................................................ 13 SEAWALL ....................................................................................................................... 13 Description............................................................................................................ 14 History................................................................................................................... 16 BULKHEAD WHARF ..................................................................................................... 19 Introduction........................................................................................................... 19 Description................................................................................................ 19 History......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    Form No 10-306 (Rev 10-74) UNlTEDSTAThS DEPARTMENT OF THt INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ | NAME HISTORIC Ferryboat Eureka (formerly Ukiah) AND/OR COMMON Eureka LOCATION STREETS.NUMBER Historic Ships Unit, Hyde Street Pier, National Maritime Museum _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT San Francisco VICINITY OF Fifth STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 San Francisco 075 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _DISTRICT X.PUBLIC —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE JXMUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE XUNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL _PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE v PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _IN PROCESS XYES: RESTRICTED ^GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER: AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS inapplicable) National Park Service, Western Regional Office STREET & NUMBER 450 Golden Gate Avenue. Box 36063 CITY. TOWN STATE San Francisco VICINITY OF California 94102 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEos.ETc Golden Gate National Recreation Area STREET & NUMBER Building 201, Fort Mason CITY. TOWN STATE San Francisco, California 94123 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE National Register of Historic Places DATE February 28, 1973 -^FEDERAL —STATE _COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS National Park Service CITY. TOWN STATE Washington D.C DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED —ORIGINAL SITE .XGOOD —RUINS FALTERED —MOVED HATF N/A _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The historic ferry Eureka (formerly known as Ukiah) is moored in an early 20th Century ferry slip at Hyde Street Pier, a unit of the National Maritime Museum, San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • Allision of Staten Island Ferry Andrew J. Barberi St
    Allision of Staten Island Ferry Andrew J. Barberi St. George, Staten Island, New York October 15, 2003 Marine Accident Report NTSB/MAR-05/01 PB2005-916401 Notation 7628A National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C. Marine Accident Report Allision of Staten Island Ferry Andrew J. Barberi St. George, Staten Island, New York October 15, 2003 NTSB/MAR-05/01 PB2005-916401 National Transportation Safety Board Notation 7628A 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Adopted March 8, 2005 Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2005. Allision of Staten Island Ferry Andrew J. Barberi, St. George, Staten Island, New York, October 15, 2003. Marine Accident Report NTSB/MAR-05/01. Washington, DC. Abstract: This report discusses the allision of the passenger ferry Andrew J. Barberi with maintenance pier B-1 at the Staten Island ferry terminal on October 15, 2003. The ferry carried an estimated 1,500 passengers and 15 crewmembers. Ten passengers died in the accident and 70 were injured. An eleventh seriously injured passenger died 2 months later. Damages totaled more than $8 million, with repair costs of $6.9 million for the Andrew J. Barberi and $1.4 million for the pier. From its investigation of the accident, the Safety Board identified the following safety issues: actions of the assistant captain and captain, oversight of ferry operations by the New York City Department of Transportation, medical oversight of mariners, safety management systems, and the potential contribution of navigation technology to the safety of ferry operations. On the basis of its findings, the Safety Board made recommendations to the New York City Department of Transportation, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL REGISTER OF
    NPS FORM 10-900 ro cr <"- £T S \ / J%^- -3 OMB NO, 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service /i SEP 2 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM______________ This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual propertie^w^gjj^fi^^j^SeelnstfuctiQ^s in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Regisrei^Q^fm^fc$^/ Complete each item by marking "X" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any itemtW^^?Qgpl/to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classificatiSn>fQ^tefllals, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries ana narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Pier One_________________________________________________ other names/site number: N/A______________________________________________ 2. Location street & number Pier One. The Embarcadero fat Washington Street) not for publication N/A__________ city or town San Francisco_________________________vicinity ___N/A state California______ code CA___county San Francisco code 075 zip code 94111 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this __X__ nomination .____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedurai and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X_____ meets ______ does not meet the National Register Criteria, recommend that this property be considered significant ____ nationally ____ statewide _x__ locally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Train Sheet Preserving the Feather River Route"
    The Train Sheet Preserving The Feather River Route" NOVEKBER DECEKBER 1959 ISSUE NO. lio $1.50 Western Pacific car ferry LAS PLUMAS waits for its next load of freight cars to take from WP's San Francisco 25th Street Yard. A tug and barge No. 3 are still on standby in this WP photo taken in March, 1960. COVER STORY LAS PLUMAS by NORMAN HOLMIS Prior to the time Western Pacific's One of the two WP tug boats, the cE:1- ferry "LAS PLUMAS" was placed in service, HERCULES, has been preserved at the WP operated two steam tug boats to barge National Maritime Museum in San Fran- freight cars between Oakland and. San Fran- cisco. Located at the Hyde Street Pier, cisco. The tug and barge operation not she is undergoing restoration by only srved 25th Street yard, but also volunteers who hope to once again place delivered cars to the State Belt Railroad her into operating condition. near Fisherman's Wharf and serviced Information for this article was Alameda Belt's slip in Alameda. Due to gleaned from Pacific News, Western Rail- their age and limited capacity (11 cars on roader, WP Mileposts and the National a barge), management arranged for con- Maritime Museum news letter. Thanks to struction of a new self propelled car George Comer for assistance. ferry. The new LAS PLUMAS passed under the Golden Gpte bridge at 11 PM on July 10, 1957, on its way down from Portland, Oregon. It was believed this was the first train ferry to operate on thePacific Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation for Bids San Francisco Bay Area Water
    INVITATION FOR BIDS SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2021 VALLEJO FERRY TERMINAL DREDGING PROJECT IFB #21-008 VOLUME 2 DIVISION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS MAY 6, 2021 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Volume 2 IFB #21-008 SECTION 00001 ORDER OF WORK PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE OF WORK A. Order of Work shall be as delineated below. The Contractor may submit an alternative order of Work for review by the Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA). WETA reserves right of refusal or acceptance of the order of Work other than as noted below. Order of Work shall conform to the provisions in Section 5-1.05, “Order of Work,” of the Standard Plans and Specifications of the State of California, Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, May 2006 edition and these special provisions. B. Proposed sequence of Work: Vallejo Ferry Terminal: Contractor shall submit a sequence of Work to WETA for review. The Contractor shall base the sequence of Work on the following proposed sequence of Work, and shall include all necessary items, details and order of Work whether or not listed herein or on the plans. 1. Contractor shall set up operational communication protocol with San Francisco Bay Ferry - Vallejo Operations Manager, Peter Belden (telephone number (415)-850-0413) prior to the start of construction. Required communication will be determined before the start of construction and will include at least one telephone call to the Vallejo Operations Manager each day throughout the duration of the Project to confirm dredging events and other operations planned for the following day.
    [Show full text]