Pipes Hillary H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pipes Hillary H Capital Raising in the Current Environment I: PIPEs Hillary H. Holmes and Eric Scarazzo June 18, 2020 PIPEs: Panelists Hillary H. Holmes is a partner in the Houston office of Eric Scarazzo ​is Of Counsel in the New York office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Co-Chair of the firm’s Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. He is a member of the firm’s Capital Markets practice group. Ms. Holmes advises Capital Markets, Securities and Regulation and companies in all sectors of the energy industry on long- Corporate Governance, Power and Renewables, Global term and strategic capital planning, disclosure and Finance, and Mergers & Acquisitions Practice Groups. reporting obligations under U.S. federal securities laws, Mr. Scarazzo’s practice covers both the conduct of and corporate governance. She represents issuers, securities offerings and service as clients’ outside underwriters, MLPs, financial advisors, private investors, corporate counsel. He advises in a wide range of areas, management teams and private equity firms in all forms such as capital raising transactions, reporting obligations of capital markets transactions. Her extensive experience under the Exchange Act (including significant advisory comprises IPOs, registered offerings of debt and equity work with respect to acquisition reporting), prospective securities, private placements of debt and equity and remedial stock exchange compliance, and beneficial securities, structured preferred equity, joint ventures and ownership reporting matters (particularly complex private equity investments. She frequently advises Section 13 and 16 disclosure matters). As day-to-day boards of directors, special committees, and financial outside counsel he also assists clients in communicating advisors in M&A transactions involving conflicts of with investors and the U.S. stock markets, and ensuring interest or unique complexities. that they fulfill their disclosure obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, he Ms. Holmes is Band 1 ranked by Chambers USA in has been a certified public accountant for nearly 20 Capital Markets: Central United States, and in Energy / years. Oil & Gas Transactions: Nationwide and Corporate / M&A: Texas. Mr. Scarazzo received his J.D. from UCLA and his Masters in Accounting and his B.S. from the University of Ms. Holmes received her J.D. from the University of Virginia. Pennsylvania Law School and her B.A., cum laude, from Duke University. Contact: Office - 212.351.2389 Contact: Email - [email protected] Office - 346.718.6602 https://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyer/scarazzo-eric/ Email - [email protected] https://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyer/holmes-hillary-h/ Special appreciation to Gibson Dunn associates Harrison Tucker and Jonathan Lee for their assistance with this presentation. Gibson Dunn 2 PIPEs: Table of Contents I. Overview of PIPE Transactions § Background on PIPEs, including current state § Advantages and disadvantages of PIPEs II. Deal Structure § Key terms (security, transaction and governance) § Select issuer and investor considerations III. Annexes § Case studies and other resources Gibson Dunn 3 Overview of PIPE Transactions Overview – Background PIPE: Private Investment in Public Equity • Definition. A private placement by a public company of equity or equity-linked securities to selected accredited investors. • Typical Characteristics. Generally less than 20% of issuer’s equity, with restrictions on trading issued securities for a certain period of time. Transactions are private and often highly negotiated. • Typical Context. Higher cost of capital than debt, so issuers traditionally utilize PIPEs when credit market is inaccessible or impractical. Tightening of credit market can also push financial sponsors to invest in PIPEs because of potential for high returns and difficulty of engaging in leveraged buyouts. Gibson Dunn 5 Overview – Current State of PIPEs PIPEs are on the rise, particularly among larger public companies and private equity sponsors. • Larger Deals. Since February 2020: Parallels to Great • More than 50 proposed or closed PIPE transactions of over $300 Recession million. • 14 companies have raised at least $1 billion, including Twitter Inc., Ø Similarities: Rise in PIPE Carnival Corp. and Dick’s Sporting Goods. activity given tightening of credit markets. • New Participants. Since February 2020, 44% of large PIPE transactions were completed by companies that have never previously accessed the PIPE Ø Differences: Influx of market, including Coty Inc., Under Armour Inc. and Lyft Inc. larger companies • Other Recent Notable Transactions. doing larger deals and some enhanced • Norwegian Cruise Lines Holdings Ltd.’s issuance of $400 million in interest from convertible debt to L Catterton. institutional • Expedia’s $1.1 billion preferred nonconvertible issuance to Apollo investors. Management and Silver Lake Partners. • Refer to Annex A (Selected Case Studies) and Annex B (Additional Precedent on PIPE Transactions) Gibson Dunn 6 Overview – Sponsor PIPE Issuances $22.0 PIPE Volume ($bn) $20.0 14 20 29 28 24 48 $18.0 $16.0 $15.5 $14.0 $10bn OXY ) PIPE Annualized bn $12.0 $10.0 $10.6 $8.4 $8.5 Volume ($ Volume $8.0 $0.5 $0.8 $7.0 $7.3 $2.5 $1.5 $6.0 $5.5 $1.6 $0.2 $5.0 $0.9 $2.2 $2.3 $4.0 $2.3 $1.8 $0.3 $1.2 $0.5 $0.3 $0.6 $2.0 $2.3 $0.4 $0.1 $0.7 $2.6 $2.1 $4.0 $2.3 $2.4 $0.0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 YTD Common Stock Common Stock with Warrants Convertible Note Convertible Preferred Non-Convertible Debt / Preferred ____________________ Gibson Dunn Source: Private Raise as of 5/8/2020. 7 Includes Unregistered Sponsor PIPEs, closed or in definitive agreement, of at least $100mm in size and at least 5% of market cap since 2015. Security types include Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Convertible Preferred, Convertible Debt, Non-Convertible Preferred and Non-Convertible Debt. Overview – Advantages of PIPEs PIPEs are highly customizable, fast and available when other financing sources may not be. Availability Execution Investment • Issuer. Can be executed when • Speedy and Confidential • Customization. Securities can be debt financing or public equity Transaction. Reduces burden on specifically tailored to objectives offering may not be possible. management and transactions of investor and issuer. costs and can be executed quickly • Financial Sponsor as Investor. and quietly without advance public • Investor Base. Issuer can target Attractive alternative to LBOs. disclosure. specific investors and expand base of institutional investors. • Diligence. May be limited due to investor sophistication and • Strong Platform. Investor can investors’ desire not to receive quickly gain significant position in MNPI, although many investors do promising public company. require significant due diligence. • Securities Registration. Registration not required and not subject to “baby shelf” restrictions. Gibson Dunn 8 Overview – Disadvantages of PIPEs The market for PIPEs may be opaque, and PIPEs may create post- investment obligations. Availability Execution Investment • Network Required. Knowledge of • Price Discount and Dilution. Purchase • Compromises. May signal investors required, given significant price often heavily discounted and may desperation, require giving up some participation in market by hedge funds be significantly dilutive. control and have chilling effect on and distressed investors. subsequent acquisition of issuer or • Approvals, Compliance and future financing activity. Issuer Registration. May require shareholder approval under NASDAQ or NYSE rules (refer to Annex C), HSR or other filings (refer to Annex D) or approvals or SEC registration on back end. • Limited Market. Limited and opaque • Limited Diligence. Diligence and • Ownership Hurdle. Significant market for PIPE issuers. transactional timeline may be NASDAQ and NYSE hurdles for accelerated. investments over 20% (refer to Annex C) Investor Gibson Dunn 9 Deal Structure Deal Structure – Key Terms PIPE terms generally revolve around the following: The Security Governance and Rights The Transaction Gibson Dunn 11 Deal Structure – The Security PIPE terms generally revolve around the following: Economic The Security 1. Size of investment 2. Type of security 3. Coupon/dividends 4. Priority 5. Maturity Governance 6. Liquidation preference and Rights Non-Economic 1. Redemption/repurchase rights 2. Conversion rights The 3. Anti-dilution protections 4. Voting rights Transaction 5. Registration rights 6. Change of control/fundamental change protections Gibson Dunn 12 Deal Structure – Governance and Rights PIPE terms generally revolve around the following: Investor Rights The Security 1. Board seats and observer rights 2. Consent and approval rights 3. Preemptive/participation rights 4. Information rights Governance 5. Covenants, defaults and remedies and Rights 6. Other Issuer Protections 1. Standstill 2. Restrictions on transfer The 3. Voting agreements Transaction 4. Other Gibson Dunn 13 Deal Structure – The Transaction PIPE terms generally revolve around the following: The Security Governance and Rights The 1. Fee and expense reimbursements 2. Closing conditions Transaction 3. Documentation Gibson Dunn 14 Deal Structure – Issuer Considerations Select Issuer considerations also include: State Law Contractual •Board fiduciary duties, including conflicts of interest •Existing preemptive, anti-dilution, registration and •Adequacy of authorized capital similar rights •Poison pill triggers •Debt covenants •DGCL § 203 and similar anti-takeover statutes •Standstill and
Recommended publications
  • 2017 Corporate Responsibility Report Corporate 2017 Stewardship
    alues V 2017 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT CORPORATE 2017 through STEWARDSHIP CenterPoint Energy 2017 Corporate Responsibility Report Stewardship through Values We will invest our capital to support safety, growth, reliability, grid hardening and infrastructure replacement, as well as to meet regulatory requirements. Approximately 7,000 Approximately trees planted and distributed $8.3 through our billion Right Tree Right 2018-22 capital Place program spending plan $6.5 million in contributions to nonprofits Nearly 8,000 dedicated employees In the communities where we live and work, we focus our time and energy on our three strategic giving pillars: education, community development, and health and human services. 2017 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT : PAGE 1 Our residential customers ranked us highest in customer satisfaction among large natural gas utilities in the South region in the annual study by J.D. Power and Associates. 1.3 million power restorations during Hurricane Added Harvey 70,000+ metered customers 1 million customers enrolled CenterPoint Energy strives in Power Alert to make a positive difference Service for all of our stakeholders through our values of safety, integrity, accountability, initiative and 146,000 respect. hours volunteered PAGE 2 : CENTERPOINT ENERGY Table of Contents About This Report About This Report 2 CenterPoint Energy is pleased to report continued progress Letter to Stakeholders 3 on our corporate responsibility efforts since we published our first Corporate Responsibility Report last year. Our 2017 About CenterPoint Energy 4 report provides more insight into our efforts regarding corporate Our Business 4 responsibility and stewardship. Operations Map 6 In line with our core values of safety, integrity, accountability, 2017 Results 7 initiative and respect, we strive to address issues that are Governance 10 important to our stakeholders in a thoughtful and transparent Approach 11 manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Update: Statewide Power Generation Emergency Expected to Extend Outages for Centerpoint Energy Customers
    For more information, contact Media Relations [email protected] For Immediate Release Page 1 of 3 Update: Statewide power generation emergency expected to extend outages for CenterPoint Energy customers Houston – Feb. 16, 2021 – The Texas electric system continues to face an unprecedented power shortage due to extreme winter weather. Because the state’s current power generation has fallen short of demand, significant electricity outages have resulted across Texas and are lasting longer than previously planned. CenterPoint Energy is required to comply with ERCOT’s directive to suspend electric service to a portion of its customers. The company does not generate electricity itself, so the current shortage of power capacity from the grid is not something that CenterPoint Energy directly controls. Due to the continued issues with power generators’ ability to produce electricity, CenterPoint Energy’s customers need to be prepared to be without power, potentially for the duration of the generation shortage event, which could last several more days. CenterPoint Energy continues to navigate this historic weather event to provide for the stabilization of its electric delivery system and the reliability of its natural gas infrastructure. The company’s transmission and distribution systems handled the severe weather well, and CenterPoint Energy is prepared to serve its customers when generating capacity from third-party generators is available. As an electric transmission and delivery company serving the Greater Houston area, CenterPoint Energy depends on electricity that is provided by third-party electricity generators and received through the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), which is responsible for managing and scheduling power on the electric grid in Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Centerpoint Energy Inc
    CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 02/26/16 for the Period Ending 12/31/15 Address 1111 LOUISIANA ST HOUSTON, TX 77002 Telephone 7132073000 CIK 0001130310 Symbol CNP SIC Code 4911 - Electric Services Industry Electric Utilities Sector Utilities Fiscal Year 12/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2016, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ______________________ Form 10-K (Mark One) þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO Commission File Number 1-31447 ______________________ CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Texas 74-0694415 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 207-1111 (Address and zip code of principal executive offices) (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange Chicago Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Order for Indirect License Transfer for South Texas, Units 1 and 2
    7590-01 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. ) Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499 TEXAS GENCO, LP ) ) (South Texas Project, ) License Nos. NPF-76 and NPF-80 Units 1 and 2) ) ORDER APPROVING APPLICATION REGARDING INDIRECT LICENSE TRANSFERS I. STP Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC or the licensee) and owners Texas Genco, LP (Texas Genco or the applicant), the City Public Service Board of San Antonio (CPS), and the City of Austin, Texas (COA) are holders of Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-76 and NPF-80, which authorize the possession, use, and operation of the South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 (the facility or STP). STPNOC is licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) to operate STP. The facility is located at the licensees' site in Matagorda County, Texas. II. By application dated June 28, 2005, as supplemented by letter dated August 4, 2005, (collectively referred to herein as the application), STPNOC, acting on behalf of Texas Genco, requested that the NRC, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, consent to the proposed indirect transfer of control of the STP licenses to the extent held by Texas Genco. Texas Genco is a 44 percent owner and non-operating licensee of STP. According to the application filed by STPNOC on behalf of Texas Genco, Texas Genco is -2- indirectly owned by Texas Genco Holdings, Inc., which in turn is wholly owned by Texas Genco LLC. Texas Genco LLC is owned by investment funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group, Hellman & Friedman LLC, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release Centerpoint Energy Asks Indiana South Natural
    For more information, contact Media Relations [email protected] For Immediate Release Page 1 of 1 CenterPoint Energy asks Indiana South natural gas customers to lower thermostats to conserve energy during extreme cold Evansville, Ind. – Feb. 16, 2021 – Due to high heating demand in response to the extremely cold temperatures, CenterPoint Energy is asking its Indiana South natural gas customers to temporarily lower their thermostat settings to help conserve natural gas. The utility serves approximately 113,000 natural gas customers in its southwestern Indiana territory. “We are not currently in an emergency situation, but we ask for our customers’ assistance in curbing their natural gas usage so that we can continue to provide reliable service and prevent any disruptions,” said Richard Leger, Vice President, Natural Gas Distribution, Indiana and Ohio. “We apologize for any inconvenience and thank our customers for all their energy conservation efforts during this time.” CenterPoint Energy asks its customers, if possible, to reduce their thermostat settings to 60-65 degrees during the day when at home – and lower the setting an additional 5-10 degrees when asleep or away from home – through Friday morning, Feb. 19. This step can help ensure that all customers continue to have gas service to stay safe and warm during the intensely cold weather. If a customer experiences a loss of gas service, they should contact the utility at 1-800-227-1376. The utility offers these additional energy saving tips for customers: • Lower the temperature setting on your water heater and limit your use of hot water. • Open blinds and shades to take advantage of the sun’s natural heat during the day.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): APRIL 13, 2005 ---------- CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) TEXAS 1-31447 74-0694415 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer of incorporation) Identification No.) 1111 LOUISIANA HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 207-1111 ---------- Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): [ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) [ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) ITEM 2.01 COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF ASSETS. ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS. On April 13, 2005, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. ("CenterPoint Energy") completed the sale of its nuclear generation assets, consisting of a 30.8% undivided interest in the South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, to Texas Genco LLC (formerly known as GC Power Acquisition LLC) for $700 million in cash. The sale was effected through the merger of CenterPoint Energy's wholly owned subsidiary, Texas Genco Holdings, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States ————
    No. 12-980 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— THE STATE OF NEVADA, ET AL., Petitioners, v. RELIANT ENERGY, INC., ET AL., Respondents. ———— On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada ———— BRIEF IN OPPOSITION ———— ORRIN L. HARRISON III J. GREGORY COPELAND AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & MARK R. ROBECK FELD LLP AARON M. STREETT 1700 Pacific Ave., Ste. 4100 Counsel of Record Dallas, Texas 75201-4624 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. (214) 969-2860 910 Louisiana St. Houston, Texas 77002 Counsel for Respondent (713) 229-1234 CenterPoint Energy, Inc. [email protected] JACK DICANIO Counsel for Respondents Reliant SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, Energy, Inc. and Reliant MEAGHER & FLOM, LLP Resources, Inc. 300 S. Grand Ave., Ste. 3400 Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 687-5430 Counsel for Respondent Kathleen M. Zanaboni WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether state-law antitrust claims asserting price fixing in wholesale natural-gas transactions within FERC’s exclusive jurisdiction are preempted by the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717 et seq, particularly where FERC determined both that it had jurisdiction over the transactions at issue and that the transactions were lawful. (i) ii CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to this Court’s Rule 29.6, Respondents submit this corporate disclosure statement. After the underlying lawsuit was filed, Respondents Reliant Energy, Inc. and Reliant Energy Services, Inc. were a part of a series of name changes and corporate transactions. Reliant Energy, Inc. changed its name to RRI Energy, Inc. and subsequently merged with Mirant Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Practices in Combined Gas and Electric Utility Energy Efficiency Programs
    Successful Practices in Combined Gas and Electric Utility Energy Efficiency Programs Seth Nowak, Marty Kushler, and Patti Witte August 2014 Report U1406 © American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy 529 14th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20045 Phone: (202) 507-4000 • Twitter: @ACEEEDC Facebook.com/myACEEE • www.aceee.org GAS AND ELECTRIC PROGRAMS © ACEEE Contents About the Authors .............................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ v Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Rationale for Natural Gas and Electric Energy Efficiency Program Level Cooperation ........... 2 Increased Savings Impact ......................................................................................................... 2 Reduced Program Costs ........................................................................................................... 3 Enhanced Customer Satisfaction ............................................................................................. 3 Other Benefits of Gas-Electric Collaboration ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • File No. 070-10128 UNITED STATES
    File No. 070-10128 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ------------------------------------------ FORM U-1/A POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 13 TO APPLICATION/DECLARATION UNDER THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 ------------------------------------------ CenterPoint Energy, Inc. 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 Utility Holding, LLC 200 West Ninth Street Plaza Suite 411 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 (Names of companies filing this statement and addresses of principal executive offices) ------------------------------------------ CenterPoint Energy, Inc. 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 (Name of top registered holding company parent) ------------------------------------------ Rufus S. Scott CenterPoint Energy, Inc. Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 207-7451 (Name and address of agent for service) ---------------------------------------- The Commission is also requested to send copies of any communications in connection with this matter to: James R. Doty Margo S. Scholin Joanne C. Rutkowski Baker Botts L.L.P. Baker Botts L.L.P. 3000 One Shell Plaza The Warner Houston, Texas 77002-4995 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (713) 229-1234 Washington, DC 20004-2400 (202) 639-7700 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED TRANSACTION............................. 2 A. INTRODUCTION....................................................... 2 B. BACKGROUND........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • File No. 070-10299 UNITED STATES
    File No. 070-10299 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM U-1/A AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO APPLICATION/DECLARATION UNDER THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 CenterPoint Energy, Inc. 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 Utility Holding, LLC 1011 Centre Road, Suite 324 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 CenterPoint Energy Service Company, LLC CenterPoint Energy Funding Company CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company, LLC CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company II, LLC Houston Industries FinanceCo GP, LLC CenterPoint Energy Investment Management, Inc. CenterPoint Energy Properties, Inc. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. Arkansas Louisiana Finance Corporation Arkla Industries Inc. CenterPoint Energy Alternative Fuels, Inc. CenterPoint Energy Field Services, Inc. CenterPoint Energy Gas Receivables, LLC CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company CenterPoint Energy - Illinois Gas Transmission Company CenterPoint Energy Intrastate Holdings, LLC Pine Pipeline Acquisition Company, LLC CenterPoint Energy Gas Services, Inc. CenterPoint Energy - Mississippi River Transmission Corporation CenterPoint Energy MRT Services Company CenterPoint Energy Pipeline Services, Inc. CenterPoint Energy OQ, LLC CenterPoint Energy Intrastate Pipelines, Inc. Minnesota Intrastate Pipeline Company NorAm Financing I HL&P Capital Trust II CenterPoint Energy Funds Management, Inc. CenterPoint Energy International, Inc. CenterPoint Energy Avco Holdings, LLC CenterPoint Energy Offshore Management
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): NOVEMBER 23, 2004 ------------------------------ CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) TEXAS 1-31447 74-0694415 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer of incorporation) Identification No.) 1111 LOUISIANA HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 207-1111 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): [ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) [ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT. ITEM 2.01 COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF ASSETS. ITEM 2.03 CREATION OF A DIRECT FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR AN OBLIGATION UNDER AN OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGMENT OF A REGISTRANT. On December 10, 2004, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. ("CenterPoint Energy") entered into the First Amendment (the "Amendment") to their Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2003, with the banks named therein.
    [Show full text]
  • File No. 070-10265 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
    File No. 070-10265 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FORM U-1 APPLICATION/DECLARATION UNDER THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 CenterPoint Energy, Inc. 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 Utility Holding, LLC 200 West Ninth Street Plaza Suite 411 Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (Name of companies filing this statement and address of principal executive offices) CenterPoint Energy, Inc. 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 (Name of top registered holding company parent of each applicant or declarant) Rufus S. Scott Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary CenterPoint Energy, Inc. 1111 Louisiana Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 207-7451 The Commission is also requested to send copies of any communications in connection with this matter to: James R. Doty, Esq. Margo S. Scholin, Esq. Joanne C. Rutkowski, Esq. Baker Botts L.L.P. Baker Botts L.L.P. 3000 One Shell Plaza The Warner Houston, Texas 77002-4995 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (713) 229-1234 Washington, D.C. 20004-2400 (202) 639-7700 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION From time to time, we make statements concerning our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements, that are not historical facts. These statements are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. You can generally identify our forward-looking statements by the words "contemplate," "may," "propose," "should," "will," "would" or other similar words.
    [Show full text]