ACTA AGROBOTANICA Vol. 64 (4): 171–180 2011

THE GROWTH, FLOWERING AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF LEAVES OF THREE ECOTYPES OF ursinum L.

Marzena Błażewicz-Woźniak, Anna Michowska

Department of Cultivation and Fertilization of Horticultural , University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczyńskiego 58, 20-068 Lublin, Poland Poland, e-mail: [email protected]

Received: 07.07.2011

Abstract 1539 herbarium of Hieronymus Bock (Clarke, The experiment was conducted in the Botanical Garden 2001). The healing properties of wild forest were of UMCS in Lublin. A collection of three ecotypes of Allium already well known, and its health-promoting action ursinum L. from Dukla, Roztocze Region and Bieszczady mo- made it an equally valuable component in herbalism as untain range, were the subject of our study. The aim of the study common garlic. The usable part of the is usually was to compare the biometrical features and chemical composi- its delicate and fragile leaves, which should be collec- tion of garlic leaves. There were substantial differences both in ted in the first phase of blooming. The bear’s garlic growth characteristics and flowering characteristics of the eco- is a common “wild” vegetable in Ukraine, Russia, types of . The Dukla ecotype formed the longest and Caucasus. It is sold on local markets: fresh, pic- leaves, whereas the shortest ones were found in the Roztocze kled or salted. It is becoming increasingly popular in ecotype. The Bieszczady ecotype was characterized by the wi- the Czech Republic and Germany (Ł uczaj, 2004). dest leaf blades, the longest leaf stalk and flowering stems as Folk medicine recommends the use of bear’s garlic as well as the largest diameter of . The Roztocze eco- type had the largest number of flowers in an inflorescence, whi- an anti-scorbutic, fever-fighting, hunger-provoking le the Dukla ecotype had the shortest flowering stems and the agent, also recommended in problems with intestines fewest flowers in an inflorescence. The largest concentration of (Janeczko and Sobolewska, 1995). dry mass in leaves was detected in A. ursinum from Roztocze. The bear’s garlic (Allium ursinum L.) is charac- The largest concentration of proteins was detected in the leaves terized by its composition, which is similar to that of of A. ursinum from Bieszczady. The most flavonoids were as- common garlic (Chybowski, 1997; Kohlmün- sayed in the leaves of the Roztocze ecotype of A. ursinum, the zer, 1998). It has a large content of flavonoids (171.2 fewest in the Dukla one. Phenolic acids were at their highest mg×mg-1 protein), carotenoids (3.99 mg×mg-1 prote- concentration in the leaves of bear’s garlic from Dukla, while in), chlorophyll a (2.87 mg×mg-1 protein) and b (1.36 the lowest concentration was recorded in the leaves of the eco- mg×mg-1 protein) (Štajner et al. 2008). Due to the type from Bieszczady. The garlic leaves from Dukla had also content of allin, and other sulphuric compounds, the highest content of , while the Roztocze ones had it is characterized by its parasite-killing, fungicidal the lowest oil content. The ecotypes of Allium ursinum differed and anti-bacterial properties (Chybowski, 1997; substantially when it comes to the number of components of their essential oils and the amount of selected components. Gorecki, 2001; Saniewska and Ż uradzka, 2001). In vitro tests have proven that the presence of bear’s garlic flavonoids: -glucoside and -neohespe- Key words: Allium ursinum L., inflorescence, protein, flavo- noids, phenyl acids, essential oil ridose of kaempferol, acts as a slowing agent in aggre- gation of human blood thrombocytes (Carotenuto et al. 1996). Preuss et al. (2001) have even achieved INTRODUCTION a stronger therapeutic effect of Allium ursinum, when compared with Allium sativum. In exploring the anti- The bear’s garlic (Allium ursinum L.) has been -oxidizing properties of bear’s , Godevać known to folk medicine for ages. The genus was first et al. (2008) have proven its high capabilities in remo- described, including its botanical description, in the ving radicals and have also stressed the possibility of 172 Marzena Błażewicz-Woźniak, Anna Michowska using Allium ursinum in the field of conventional me- macopoeia VII 2008) as well as qualitative, quantitative dicine as a drug lowering blood pressure. Numerous and semi-quantitative analysis of the content of all oil scientific studies have proven the highly antioxidant components with the use of the GC/MS method. The properties of bear’s garlic. The analysis of , le- determination was done with a Varium 4000 GC/MS/ aves, and scapes has shown the activity of, inter alia, MS gas chromatograph. The results were subjected to SOD (SuperOxide Dismutase), catalase, peroxidase statistical analysis by variance analysis, with the signifi- and glutathione peroxidase in all parts of the plant. The cance of differences estimated with Tukey’s test for the strongest antioxidant properties were found in leaves level of significance set at =0.05. of bear’s garlic (Štajner et al. 2008). The analysis of bear’s garlic has also shown its high biolo- RESULTS gical value. Particularly its high content of proteins shows that it could potentially be used to fatten honey Biometric features of plants (Ż uraw, 2007). The length of leaves of the examined ecotypes The aim of the present study was to compare the of bear’s garlic, depending on the year of examination, biometrical features of plants and the chemical compo- varied in the range from 70 up to 244 mm (Table 1). sition of leaves of three ecotypes of bear’s garlic (Al- The longest leaves were produced by the plants of the lium ursinum L.). Dukla and Bieszczady ecotypes, the shortest ones by the Roztocze ecotype. The length of leaves increased MATERIAL AND METHODS significantly, 78 mm on average, during the month be- tween the two measurements. The Roztocze ecotype, The experiment was conducted in the Botanical whose leaves almost doubled in length reaching 200 Garden of the University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska mm, was characterized by the fastest pace of growth. o o in Lublin (Poland, 51 23’N, 22 56’E). The experiment Regardless of their growth rate, the leaves of the Roz- included a collection of three ecotypes of Allium ursi- tocze ecotype were significantly shorter when compa- num L.: from Dukla, Roztocze, and Bieszczady. The red with the leaves of the remaining two ecotypes of bulbs of garlic were planted at 20×30 cm intervals in Allium ursinum. Significant differences in length of four repeating patterns of 50 bulbs in each. The soil for garlic leaves were recorded between years. The longest the experiment contained (on average): 1.6% of humus, leaves were recorded in all ecotypes in May 2009, with -1 -1 20.0-21.7 mg P×100 g , 6.9-11.7 mg K×100 g , and the shortest ones being recorded in 2008. -1 11.3 -14.7 mg Mg×100 g and its reaction was in the The width of leaves in April, depending on the range between 6.9 and 7.2 pH. Before planting, the soil ecotype and year of examination, varied between 22 was cultivated with the use of a rototiller and nitrogen and 59 mm (Table 1). From April till May, the width . -1 fertilization was applied at a rate of 90 kg N ha in the increased significantly, 16 mm on average. The leaves form of ammonium nitrate (34% N). The soil surface of the Bieszczady ecotype were slightly wider in May, was covered with pine bark mulch. The plants grew in with the Roztocze ecotype characterized by the narro- the vicinity of broad-leaved trees. During the vegetation west leaves. The leaves with the largest diameter were period, the annual measurements of Allium ursinum recorded in 2009, while the most slender ones were ecotypes were taken. The length and width of leaves, the produced in 2008. length of leaf stem and of flowering stems were taken. The length of petiole of Allium ursinum in April The length of flower stalk, the diameter of inflorescen- varied between 25 and 74 mm (Table 1). The exami- ce and the number of flowers per inflorescence were ned ecotypes showed no significant differences in this also recorded. Chemical analyses were conducted for aspect during the examination. The length of petiole the plant material. The garlic leaves were collected in increased significantly within a month, 23 mm on ave- the first stage of blooming. Total N content was deter- rage. The Bieszczady ecotype of A. ursinum produced mined with the use of the Kjeldahl method and a Kjeltec the longest petiole, with the Roztocze ecotype having System 1002 Distilling Unit, as well as in 2.0% extract the shortest one. The longest petioles were recorded of acetic acid; K, Ca, Mg – with the use of AAS (ato- during the third year of the experiment, the shortest mic absorption spectrometry); and P – colorimetrically. ones in the plants from the first year of the experiment, Examination in the last year included the analysis of le- that is, 2007. aves and determining the sum of all flavonoids, expres- The Bieszczady ecotype produced the longest sed as quercetin equivalents, using spectrophotometry flowering stems, while the Dukla ecotype of A. ursi- (Polish Pharmacopoeia VII 2008), o-Dihydroxyphenyls num was characterized by the shortest ones (Table 2). (sum) expressed as caffeic acid equivalents using spec- The flowering stems were at their longest during the trophotometry (Singleton and Rossi, 1965), es- third year of the experiment. The shortest inflorescen- sential oils (quantitative) using distillation (Polish Phar- ces were recorded in 2007. The growth, flowering and chemical composition of leaves of three ecotypes of Allium ursinum L. 173

The diameter of the Allium ursinum inflorescen- lowing years of investigation. It was also confirmed by ce, depending on the ecotype and the year of examina- the number of flowers constituting the inflorescence. tion, varied between 28.3 and 39.4 mm (Table 2). The The of bear’s garlic contained, on ave- inflorescences of the largest diameter were formed by rage, 8 to 20 flowers (Table 2). The Roztocze ecotype the Bieszczady ecotype of bear’s garlic. The remaining was characterized by the largest amount of flowers in two ecotypes did not differ significantly in this aspect, the inflorescence, while the Dukla one had the fewest. the diameter of their inflorescence being almost 4 mm There were differences in the number of flowers be- shorter than in the Bieszczady ecotype. In 2007 the in- tween years. The plants had the largest amount of flo- florescences were significantly smaller than in the fol- wers in 2008, the lowest one in 2007.

Table 1 Biometric features of bear’s garlic leaves depending on the ecotype in years 2007-2009

Ecotype of 2007 2008 2009 Mean Features Allium ursinum from IV V IV V IV V IV V Mean Roztocze 90 151 70 153 194 296 118 200 159 Length of leaves Dukla 134 177 121 185 244 353 166 238 202 (mm) Bieszczady 135 188 122 156 213 362 157 235 196 Mean 120 172 104 165 217 337 147 225 186

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. 64.8 30.3 30.3 17.5 date of measurement - 30.3 - 30.3 - 30.3 - 11.9 - year 17.5 Roztocze 44 49 22 52 44 53 37 51 44 Width of leaves Dukla 44 49 25 59 55 64 42 57 49 (mm) Bieszczady 59 66 23 52 42 59 41 59 50 Mean 49 55 24 54 47 59 40 56 48

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s n.s. n.s n.s. n.s n.s. n.s n.s. 4.9 date of measurement - n.s. - 8.5 - 8.5 - 3.3 - year 4.9 Roztocze 25 29 69 62 42 86 45 59 52 Length of petiole Dukla 33 37 74 80 59 113 55 77 66 (mm) Bieszczady 29 35 67 80 58 144 51 86 69 Mean 29 34 70 74 53 114 51 74 62

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s n.s. n.s n.s. n.s n.s. n.s 13.9 8.0 date of measurement - n.s. - n.s. - 13.9 - 5.4 - year 8.0 * IV, V – month of measurement; n.s. – no significant differences

Table 2 Biometric features of bear’s garlic inflorescences depending on the ecotype in years 2007-2009

Features Ecotype of Allium ursinum from 2007 2008 2009 Mean Roztocze 222 290 273 262 Dukla 189 260 270 240 Length of flowering stems (mm) Bieszczady 192 328 310 277 Mean 201 293 284 259

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s. year 28.4 Roztocze 27.8 34.3 35.2 32.4 Dukla 28.3 35.2 33.8 32.4 Diameter of inflorescence (mm) Bieszczady 31.3 37.5 39.4 36.1 Mean 29.1 35.7 36.1 33.6

LSD0.05 for: ecotype 3.1 year 3.1 Roztocze 14.6 19.6 21.0 18.4 Number of flowers Dukla 13.6 20.0 8.0 13.9 per inflorescence Bieszczady 15.6 16.4 19.8 17.3 Mean 14.3 18.7 16.3 16.5

LSD0.05 for: ecotype 3.2 year 3.2 * n.s. – no significant differences 174 Marzena Błażewicz-Woźniak, Anna Michowska

The chemical composition of leaves dry mass (Table 3). A relatively larger concentration

The leaves of bear’s garlic contained, on ave- of N was detected in leaves of the Dukla ecotype of rage, from 6.69 to 15.70% of dry mass (Table 3). The garlic, the smallest one in the Roztocze ecotype. The Roztocze ecotype was the one with the highest amount bear’s garlic contained a large amount of proteins in its of dry mass, while the Dukla garlic leaves had its lo- leaves. The average content of this component in the west content. The amount of dry mass in leaves diffe- examined A. ursinum ecotypes was 23.61 g×kg-1 f.w. red between the years. The bear’s garlic produced the The Bieszczady ecotype contained the largest amount largest amount of dry mass in leaves in 2007 and the of proteins, while the Dukla garlic had the lowest. No lowest one in 2008. significant differences between N and protein contents The total content of nitrogen in the leaves of be- in the leaves of garlic were recorded between the years ar’s garlic ecotypes varied between 2.36 to 3.37% of of the experiment.

Table 3 The content of dry mass, N and protein in bear’s garlic leaves depending on the ecotype in years 2007-2009

Component Ecotype of Allium ursinum from 2007 2008 2009 Mean Roztocze 15.70 12.36 13.82 13.96 Dukla 14.14 6.69 10.19 10.34 Dry mass (%) Bieszczady 12.86 10.08 11.16 11.37 Mean 14.23 9.71 11.72 11.89

LSD0.05 for: ecotype 0.88 year 1.93 Roztocze 2.83 2.90 2.40 2.71 Dukla 3.37 3.17 2.88 3.14 N (% d.m.) Bieszczady 3.04 3.26 2.36 2.89 Mean 3.08 3.11 2.55 2.91

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s. year n.s. Roztocze 27.78 22.42 20.81 23.67 Dukla 29.78 13.26 18.31 20.45 Protein (g kg-1 f.w.) Bieszczady 24.51 20.57 34.91 26.70 Mean 27.36 18.75 24.68 23.61

LSD0.05 for: ecotype 6.12 year n.s. * n.s. – no significant differences

The amount of phosphorus in the leaves of between the three ecotypes. There were no notable dif- bear’s garlic varied between 0.010 and 0.182% d.m. ferences in the amount of phosphorus, potassium, cal- (Table 4). There were no significant differences in the cium, and magnesium in the leaves of Allium ursinum amount of this element in the examined ecotypes of Al- recorded between the years of examination. lium ursinum. The potassium levels, depending on the The content of biologically active substances ecotype, varied between 2.22 and 5.03% d.m. A little in the leaves of A. ursinum showed little differences less potassium was detected in the Bieszczady ecoty- (Fig. 1). On average, there was 0.3293 g of flavono- pe, whereas the largest concentration was found in the ids expressed as quercetin equivalents in 100 grams of plants from the Dukla ecotype. dry leaf mass. The largest amount of these substances The amount of calcium in the leaves of Allium was detected in the leaves of the Roztocze ecotype of ursinum varied between 0.37 and 2.12% d.m., depen- A. ursinum, the smallest one in the Dukla ecotype. The ding on the year of the study (Table 4). The garlic of content of phenolic acids was similar in the leaves of the Dukla ecotype showed a slightly higher concen- the studied ecotypes of bear’s garlic and on average it tration of calcium, and a slightly lower concentration amounted to 713.7 mg×100 g-1 d.m. of leaves. The Du- was recorded in case of the Bieszczady ecotype. The kla A.ursinum ecotype was characterized by the largest amount of magnesium in the leaves of bear’s garlic content of these compounds. The Bieszczady ecotype was low and, on average, it constituted 0.07 to 0.13% had the lowest content. The Dukla ecotype of A.ursi- d.m. The Bieszczady ecotype was characterized by the num accounted for the largest amount of essential oil, lowest content of this element, but no significant diffe- with an average of 0.218% d.m. The least amount was rences in accumulation of this element were recorded found in the Roztocze ecotype. The growth, flowering and chemical composition of leaves of three ecotypes of Allium ursinum L. 175

Table 4 The content of P, K, Ca and Mg in bear’s garlic leaves depending on the ecotype in years 2007-2009

Component (% d.m.) Ecotype of Allium ursinum from 2007 2008 2009 Mean Roztocze 0.048 0.166 0.068 0.094 Dukla 0.014 0.182 0.046 0.081 P Bieszczady 0.010 0.158 0.037 0.068 Mean 0.024 0.169 0.051 0.081

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s. year n.s. Roztocze 3.10 4.26 3.15 3.50 Dukla 2.38 5.03 3.28 3.56 K Bieszczady 3.45 4.07 2.22 3.25 Mean 2.98 4.45 2.88 3.44

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s. year n.s. Roztocze 0.37 1.85 1.40 1.21 Dukla 0.89 1.50 2.12 1.50 Ca Bieszczady 0.82 1.58 1.09 1.16 Mean 0.69 1.64 1.54 1.29

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s. year n.s. Roztocze 0.13 0.07 0.10 0.10 Dukla 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.11 Mg Bieszczady 0.07 0.10 0.08 0.09 Mean 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10

LSD0.05 for: ecotype n.s. year n.s. * n.s. – no significant differences

Flavonoids – recalculated to quercetin O-Dihydroxyphenyls g 100g-1d.m. recalculated to caffeic acid -1 0,350 0.3429 mg 100g d.m. 788.2 0,340 0.3293 709.0 713.7 0.3264 800 644.0 0,330 0.3185 600 0,320 400 0,310 200 0,300 0 Roztocze Dukla Bieszczady ĝrednia Mean Roztocze Dukla Bieszczady ĝredniaMean

Essential oil in %

% 0.218 0,220 0,210 0.203 0.198 0,200 0.194 0,190 0,180 Roztocze Dukla Bieszczady ĝredniaMean Fig. 1. The content of biologically active substances in the leaves of Allium ursinum depending on the ecotype

A total of 53 compounds were found in the es- fide, methyl 2-propenyl (7.39%)*; Phytol (7.18%)*; n- sential oils of the three ecotypes of bear’s garlic, but 11 -Hexadecanoic acid (7.15%)*; Phytol acetate (6.56%)*; of them remained unidentified (Table 5). The following Diallyl disulphide (5.22%)*; Cumene (4.75%)*; Trisul- compounds were the main components of the oil: Io- fide, methyl 2-propenyl (4.55%)1. none <(E)-beta – (10.20%)*; Nonanal (8.56%)*; Disul- * The average content for all the treatments. 176 Marzena Błażewicz-Woźniak, Anna Michowska

Table 5 The composition of essential oils from bear’s garlic leaves depending on the ecotypes Ecotype of Allium ursinum from No Component in % Roztocze Dukla Bieszczady 1 Disulfide, methyl 2-propenyl 16.05 ±0.25 2.45 ±0.13 3.67 ±0.16 2 Cumene - - 2.25 ±0.14 7.26 ±0.80 3 Disulfide, methyl propyl 0.13 ±0.00 0.99 ±0.04 1.03 ±0.28 4 Disulfide, methyl 1-propenyl 0.17 ±0.00 1.75 ±0.07 1.88 ±0.42 5 Benzene, 1-ethyl-4-methyl- - - 0.12 ±0.01 - - 6 Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethyl- tr. 2.75 ±0.14 6.30 ±0.41 7 Trisulfide dimethyl 12.07 ±0.46 2.29 ±0.12 3.67 ±0.37 8 5-Hepten-2-one, 6-methyl- - - 0.13 ±0.00 - - 9 Octanal tr. 0.60 ±0.01 0.47 ±0.07 10 Cyclohexanone, 2,2,6-trimethyl- 0.25 ±0.00 0.07 ±0.02 - - 11 ?? - - 0.27 ±0.02 - - 12 ?? - - 1.55 ±0.15 1.97 ±0.19 13 Disulfide, dimethyl 3.44 ±0.04 1.09 ±0.07 0.93 ±0.07 14 Diallyl disulphide 6.38 ±0.07 1.88 ±0.08 7.41 ±0.70 15 Nonanal 11.93 ±0.14 5.20 ±0.40 - - 16 ?? - - tr. - - 17 ?? 5.19 ±0.06 0.16 ±0.01 - - 18 Trisulfide, methyl 2-propenyl 3.40 ±0.04 4.89 ±0.25 5.36 ±0.18 19 1-Propene, 1-(metylthio)-, (Z)- 0.14 ±0.00 1.22 ±0.11 0.36 ±0.09 20 1-Propene, 1-(metylthio)-, (E)- 0.16 ±0.00 1.31 ±0.16 tr. 21 Decenal 0.14 ±0.00 0.46 ±0.02 tr. 22 Tetrasulfide, dimethyl 0.07 ±0.00 1.15 ±0.04 0.46 ±0.01 23 1-Cyclohexene-1-acetaldehyde, 2,6,6-trimethyl- tr. 0.28 ±0.03 - - 24 2H-1-Benzopyran, 3,4,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydro-2,5,5,8a- 0.43 ±0.15 0.48 ±0.01 0.57 ±0.07 tetramethyl- 25 2,6,10,10-Tetramethyl-1-oxa-spiro[4,5]dec-6-ene 1.26 ±0.01 0.27 ±0.01 - - 26 Trisulfide, di-2-propenyl 0.19 ±0.00 2.83 ±0.18 1.82 ±0.62 27 ?? 1.30 ±0.33 0.30 ±0.02 0.64 ±0.00 28 1-Propene, 3,3’-thiobis- CAS# 592-88-1 - - 2.71 ±0.16 1.52 ±0.00 29 Tetrasulfide, methyl 2-propenyl 0.11 ±0.00 0.94 ±0.04 0.31 ±0.00 30 2-Undecanone, 6,10-dimethyl- tr. 0.40 ±0.01 - - 31 ?? - - 0.34 ±0.01 - - 32 Caryophyllene 0.39 ±0.00 2.09 ±0.12 - - 33 Geranyl acetone 0.74 ±0.06 0.08 ±0.00 1.12 ±0.20 34 ?? 0.35 ±0.00 0.20 ±0.01 - - 35 Aromadendrene 0.63 ±0.04 0.19 ±0.01 - - 36 Ionone <(E)-beta-> 8.95 ±0.04 7.77 ±0.38 13.33 ±1.09 37 Tridecanone <2-> 0.54 ±0.01 1.44 ±0.09 0.22 ±0.00 38 ?? 0.11 ±0.00 0.33 ±0.02 - - 39 Tetrasulfide, di-2-propenyl 0.51 ±0.01 0.25 ±0.03 - - 40 1,6,10-Dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl- - - 0.30 ±0.01 - - 41 2-Hexadecanol - - 0.48 ±0.01 - - 42 Spathulenol 0.99 ±0.01 0.76 ±0.04 0.67 ±0.01 43 Caryophyllene oxide 0.32 ±0.00 0.33 ±0.03 0.24 ±0.02 The growth, flowering and chemical composition of leaves of three ecotypes of Allium ursinum L. 177

44 ?? 0.47 ±0.23 0.95 ±0.06 - - 45 Tetradecanal 1.25 ±0.01 0.78 ±0.05 1.04 ±0.18 46 ?? 0.23 ±0.00 0.92 ±0.05 0.85 ±0.03 47 Pentadecanal 0.73 ±0.08 3.85 ±0.17 1.04 ±0.07 48 2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl- 13.55 ±0.39 0.89 ±0.02 6.72 ±0.05 49 ?? 1.89 ±0.10 2.00 ±0.12 2.18 ±0.01 50 5,9,13-Pentadecatrien-2-one,6,10,14-trimethyl-,(E,E)- 2.14 ±0.53 1.28 ±0.04 3.32 ±0.02 51 Phytol 1.19 ±0.07 17.03 ±1.19 3.33 ±0.05 52 n-Hexadecanoic acid 1.34 ±0.30 16.57 ±2.24 3.55%±1.06 53 Phytol acetate 0.85 ±0.16 2.45 ±0.13 16.40 ±4.51 (-) – this value was not assayed (- -) – the compound was not detected ?? – an unidentified compound CAS# – in case of the systematic name, the CAS number was given - CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service, www.cas.org) tr. – trace amounts

These substances amounted to over 61% of to- (235 mm), the shortest ones by the Roztocze ecotype tal oil contents. Large differentiation within the com- (118 mm). In the work of Eggert (1992), the length position of essential oils was detected between the of the leaf blade of Allium ursinum varied between examined ecotypes of bear’s garlic. The plants from 293 and 326 mm, whereas Kuklová and Kukla Dukla had the largest number of essential compounds (2006) give the average length of bear’s garlic leaves (53), while the Bieszczady ecotype had the simplest as 449 mm. These values are slightly larger than tho- composition of its oil (34). Some of the main substan- se obtained in our experiment. It only confirms that, ces of the oils of two ecotypes were not detected in when planting those plants, one should aim at creating the third ecotype of garlic. Cumene, for example, was conditions similar to those which are present in natural found in both ecotypes – from the Dukla (2.25% on habitats of A. ursinum. In 2009 the plants of the Biesz- average) and Bieszczady (7.26%) ecotypes, but was czady ecotype formed leaves of 362 mm in length (on not found in the leaves of the Roztocze ecotype, whe- average). We can also assume that the length of leaves reas nonanal was found in the Roztocze (11.93%) and in the study of Kuklová and Kukla (2006) was Dukla (5.20%) ecotypes, but was not detected in the a direct result of age of the plants. Fully formed le- leaves of the Bieszczady garlic. The composition of aves of bear’s garlic, depending on the ecotype, were oils differed greatly in the content of essential substan- 53 to 64 mm in width. The Bieszczady ecotype was ces between the examined ecotypes. Even the domi- characterized by the widest leaves, the Roztocze eco- nant components of the oils of the three ecotypes were type by the narrowest ones. The literature reports the different. The essential oil of the Roztocze ecotype of width of A. ursinum leaves as 20 to 50 mm (Szafer Allium ursinum was dominated by Disulphide, methyl et al. 1986). In the present study, the bear’s garlic was 2-propenyl (16.05% on average), and 2-Pentadecano- able to produce leaves slightly wider than that. In May ne, 6,10,14-trimethyl – (13.55%), Nonanal (11.93%), the Bieszczady ecotype formed the longest petiole (86 and Trisulfide dimethyl (12.07%), while the content of mm on average) and the Roztocze ecotype the shortest these two substances in the oil of the remaining two one (59 mm). Those values differ significantly from ecotypes was a few times lower. The oil of the Du- those given in the literature. According to Szafer et kla ecotype of garlic was composed mainly of phytol al. (1986), the length of Allium ursinum petiole varies (17.03%) and n-Hexadecanoic acid (16.57%) where- from 5 to 20 mm. It is hard to explain such a big diffe- as the oil of the Bieszczady ecotype was dominated rence. It may be due to the fact that the petiole of bear’s by Phytol acetate (16.40%) and Ionone

K ę d z i a A ., 2009. Olejek czosnkowy – skład chemiczny, Trémoliè r e s M . , N o ë l V. , H é r a u l t B ., 2009. Pho- działanie farmakologiczne i lecznicze. / Garlic oil - che- sphorus and nitrogen allocation in Allium ursinum on an mical composition, pharmacological and therapeutic ef- alluvial floodplain (Eastern France). Is there an effect of fect. Post. Fitoterapii 3: 198-203. (in Polish) flooding history? Plant Soil, 324: 279-289. K o h l m ü n z e r S ., 1998. Farmakognozja. Wyd. Lekarskie Ż u r a w B ., 2005. Wpływ owadów zapylających na wiązanie PZWL Warszawa: 510-511. owoców i masę nasion 14 dzikich gatunków czosnku K u k l o v á M . , K u k l a J ., 2006. Natural Reserve Chy- (Allium L.). / Effect of pollinators on fruit set and seed noriansky luh floodplain, its ecology and biometry of weight of 14 wild species of garlic. Mat. XLII Nauk. dominant herb species. Ekológia (Bratislava), 25(4): Konf. Pszczelarskiej, Puławy 2005, Wyd. ISiK Oddz. 341-351. Pszczelnictwa: 128-130. (in Polish) Ł uczaj Ł ., 2004. Dzikie rośliny jadalne Polski. Wyd. Chemi- Ż u r a w B . , 2007. Biological value and morphological traits grafia, Krosno: 53-56. (in Polish) of pollen of selected garlic species Allium L. Acta Agro- Preuss H.G., Clouatre D., Mohamadi A., Jar- bot. 60(1): 67-71. r e l l S .T., 2001. Wild garlic has a greater effect than regular garlic on blood pressure and blood chemistries of rats. Int. Urol. Nephrology, 32: 525-530. Wzrost, kwitnienie i skład chemiczny liści Saniewska A., Ż u r a d z k a I ., 2001. Porównanie fun- trzech ekotypów Allium ursinum L. gistatycznych właściwości czterech odmian czosnku (Allium sativum L.) na przykładzie kilku gatunków patogenicznych grzybów. / Comparison of fungistatic Streszczenie properties of four varieties of garlic (Allium sativum L.) on the example of several species of pathogenic fungi. Doświadczenie przeprowadzono w Ogrodzie Folia Hort. 13/1A: 405-412. (in Polish) Botanicznym UMCS w Lublinie. Badaniami obję- Schmitt B., Schulz H., Storsberg J., Keus- to kolekcję 3 ekotypów Allium ursinum L.: z Dukli, g e n M ., 2005. Chemical characterization of Allium Roztocza i Bieszczad. Celem badań było porównanie ursinum L. depending on harvesting time. J Agric Food cech biometrycznych roślin i składu chemicznego liści Chem. 7, 53(18): 7288-7294. czosnku niedźwiedziego. Ekotypy A. ursinum różniły S e n d l A ., 1995. Allium sativum and Allium ursinum: Part 1. się istotnie cechami wzrostu i kwitnienia roślin. Naj- Chemistry, analysis, history, botany. Phytomedicine, 1: dłuższe liście wytworzył ekotyp z Dukli, a najsłabszy 323-339. wzrost liści stwierdzono w ekotypie roztoczańskim. S i n g l e t o n V. L . , R o s s i J . A . J r ., 1965. Colorimetry of Ekotyp z Bieszczad charakteryzował się najszerszą Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotung- blaszką liściową oraz najdłuższymi ogonkami liścio- stic Acid Reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16(3): 144-158. wymi, pędem kwiatostanowym a także średnicą kwia- Štajner D., Popović M.B., Č anadanović - tostanu. Największą liczbę kwiatów w kwiatostanie B r u n e t J . , Š t a j n e r M ., 2008. Antioxidant and posiadały rośliny ekotypu z Roztocza. Ekotyp z Dukli scavenger activities of Allium ursinum. Fitoterapia, tworzył najkrótsze pędy kwiatostanowe a w jego kwia- 79: 303-305. tostanach było najmniej kwiatów. Najwięcej suchej Š t a j n e r D . , Va r g a I . S ., 2003. An evaluation of the an- masy w liściach gromadził A. ursinum z Roztocza zaś tioxidant abilities of Allium species. Acta Biol. Szeged białka – z Bieszczad. Najwięcej flawonoidów ozna- 47 (1-4): 103-106. czono w liściach A. ursinum z Roztocza, a najmniej Szafer W., Kulczyń ski S., Pawł o w s k i B ., 1986. – z Dukli. Najwięcej kwasów fenolowych zawierały Rośliny polskie. Część II. Państwowe Wydawnictwo liście ekotypu z Dukli a najmniej – z Bieszczad. Naj- Naukowe Warszawa: 778-779. (in Polish) więcej olejku stwierdzono w liściach czosnku z Dukli, Thompson K., Parkinson J.A., Brand S.R., a najmniej z Roztocza. Ekotypy A. ursinum różniły się S p e n c e r R . E ., 1997. A comparative study of leaf znacznie liczbą składników olejku eterycznego oraz nutrient concentrations in a regional herbaceous flora. zawartością poszczególnych związków. New Phytol. 136: 679-689. Tr a c z y k T., 1989. Rośliny lasu liściastego. Wyd. Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa: 104-105. (in Polish)