DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Perform a Transrectal Ultrasound Examination of the Lumbosacral and Sacroiliac Joints

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Perform a Transrectal Ultrasound Examination of the Lumbosacral and Sacroiliac Joints DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING How to Perform a Transrectal Ultrasound Examination of the Lumbosacral and Sacroiliac Joints Erik H.J. Bergman, DVM, Diplomate ECAR, Associate Member LA-ECVDI*; Sarah M. Puchalski, DVM, Diplomate ACVR; and Jean-Marie Denoix, DVM, PhD, Agre´ge´, Associate Member LA-ECVDI Authors’ addresses: Lingehoeve Veldstraat 3 Lienden 4033 AK, The Netherlands (Bergman); Uni- versity of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA 95616 (Puchalski); E´ cole Nationale Ve´te´rinaire d’Alfort, 7 Avenue du Ge´ne´ral de Gaulle, 94700 Maisons- Alfort, France (Denoix); e-mail: [email protected]. *Corresponding and presenting author. © 2013 AAEP. 1. Introduction have allowed for identification of these structures 5 There is increasing interest in pathology of the and the inter-transverse joints. These authors urge lumbosacral and sacroiliac joints giving rise to stiff- caution in the interpretation of lesions identified on ness and/or lameness and decreased performance radiography in the absence of other diagnostic im- in equine sports medicine.1–3 Pain arising from aging and clinical examination. Nuclear scintigra- these regions can be problematic alone or in con- phy is an important component of work-up for junction with lameness arising from other sites sacroiliac region pain, but limitations exist. Sev- 9,10 (thoracolumbar spine, hind limbs, or forelimbs).4 eral reports exist detailing the anatomy and tech- Localization of pain to this region is critically impor- nique findings in normal horses11,12 and findings in tant through clinical assessment, diagnostic anes- lame horses.13 Patient motion, camera positioning, thesia, and imaging. and muscle asymmetry can cause errors in interpre- In general, diagnostic imaging of the axial skele- tation. In normal horses, the appearance of the ton and pelvis is difficult to perform and to interpret. sacroiliac region varies with age but is generally Radiography is infrequently performed. To obtain symmetric. In horses with sacroiliac problems, it is good-quality diagnostic radiographs, general anes- more difficult to distinguish the tubera sacrale from thesia, a high-output radiographic generator, and the sacroiliac joint than in normal horses, and, in special techniques must be performed.5,6 Variation horses with lameness, there is more asymmetry in the size and shape of the sacroiliac joints and detected.12,13 sacral wings and caudal sacral osteophytes are com- Techniques for percutaneous and transrectal ul- mon7,8; special techniques for taking radiographs trasound examination have been described, and NOTES AAEP PROCEEDINGS ր Vol. 59 ր 2013 229 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING their use is increasingly common.2,14–19 Ultra- sound is very useful for the evaluation of the joint margins and lumbosacral intervertebral disc.14 Similar to the radiographic anatomy of the region, variability exists in the appearance of the tubera sacrale, dorsal sacroiliac ligaments, thoracolumbar fasciae, and the lumbosacral joint.3,19 Artifacts of acquisition and interpretation can occur with im- proper technique in the ultrasound examination, and knowledge of reference images and the regional anatomy is paramount in accurate interpretation of diagnostic imaging studies of this region. All diag- nostic imaging techniques should also be interpreted in light of the anamnesis and the static and dynamic clinical examination. The purpose of this “How-to” presentation is to provide a review of the technique for transrectal ultrasound with reference images and ultrasound images of examples of pathology of the lumbosacral junction, lumbosacral intertransverse joints, and sacroiliac joints. This presentation will review im- aging findings in 231 horses presenting to Linge- hoeve Diergeneeskunde, Equine Referral Hospital, The Netherlands, for evaluation of stiffness or poor performance in 2012. Fig. 1. Schematic drawing by Denoix of the ventral aspect of the 2. Materials and Methods lumbosacral region illustrates the stepwise procedure of trans- The diagnostic imaging picture archiving and com- rectal evaluation of the lumbosacral and sacroiliac joints. Red munications system (PACS) of Lingehoeve Dierge- lines indicate probe orientation. A, Sixth lumbar vertebra; neeskunde was searched for all horses undergoing B, sacrum; C, sciatic nerve; a, L6 nerve root; b, S1 nerve transrectal ultrasound during 2012. Age and breed root; 1, lumbosacral intervertebral joint; 2, L5–6 intervertebral data were collected. All horses had a complete joint; 3, lumbosacral intervertebral foramen; 4, lumbosacral in- tertransverse joint; 5, S1–2 intervertebral foramen; 6, sacroiliac clinical evaluation for poor performance. After an- joint; 7, direction of imaging the psoas minor tendon. amnesis and static and dynamic examination, a per- cutaneous examination of the lumbar spine and a transrectal examination of the sacroiliac and lum- bosacral junction were performed. Transrectal ultrasound examination was per- the lumbosacral (LS) disc, the ventral longitudinal formed with the use of the technique described by ligament, and, occasionally, the dorsal longitudinal Denoix.20 and illustrated in Fig. 1. A 5- to 10-MHz ligament, can be identified (Fig. 2). At this loca- micro-convex intra-operative ultrasound probe was tion, scan the entire disc by moving the probe left used per rectum. All horses were sedated with an and right, maintaining a paramedian orientation of ␣-2 agonist and restrained in stocks. The rectum the probe. was cleaned, and copious lubricant was introduced into the rectum. A stand-off pad was not used. Step 2: Intervertebral Disc and Vertebral Bodies of Anti-spasmodic agents were used infrequently (nine L5–6 and L4–5 horses). The ultrasound images are oriented so From the LS disc, move the ultrasound probe in that ventral is to the bottom of the image display a cranial direction while maintaining the median screen, and, when appropriate, cranial is to the left. plane orientation. As the probe is moved forward, maintain visualization of the ventral vertebral Technique margin. The L5–6 disc is just dorsal and is usually caudal to the aortic bifurcation. The probe is Step 1: Lumbosacral Disc moved cranially to identify the L4–5 disc space dor- Transrectally, the aorta and its bifurcation (nor- sal to the aorta. mally at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebra) can be palpated. Place the ultrasound probe in a me- Step 3: Lumbosacral Intervertebral Foramen dian plane, caudal to the aorta and vena cava (bi- Identify the LS disc space. Move the probe in a furcation normally at the level of L5). The L6 and lateral direction, maintaining a paramedian imag- S1 vertebrae can be recognized by the well-defined ing plane. As the probe is moved laterally, look hyperechoic shadowing ventral margins, meeting for a smoothly demarcated defect in the bone surface at approximately a 140° to 150° angle. At this site, that represents the intervertebral foramen. Once 230 2013 ր Vol. 59 ր AAEP PROCEEDINGS DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Fig. 2. These images depict the desired ultrasound image and probe position for evaluation of the lumbosacral joint, including the LS disc, in a median plane (A1 and A2) and a transverse plane (B1 and B2). This represents Step 1 of the examination. Stars mark the spinal cord; X marks the ventral longitudinal ligament. the defect is identified, look for the L6 nerve root tified, the imaging plane will be oblique to the nerve, that can be identified as a bundle of long, parallel, and probe manipulation is needed to orient the ul- hyperechoic fibers. When the foramen is first iden- trasound probe parallel to the nerve root to char- Fig. 3. This image depicts a paramedian plane of the lumbosacral intertransverse joint and the associated probe position along the ventral aspect of the sacrum. This represents Step 4 of the examination. Arrow demarcates the joint space. AAEP PROCEEDINGS ր Vol. 59 ր 2013 231 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Fig. 4. These images depict longitudinal sections through three different sacroiliac joints (A) and the associated probe position (A1 and A2). Star marks the ventral sacroiliac ligament. This represents Step 6 of the examination. Arrow marks the joint space. acterize this structure as it passes through the L6 nerve root. The operator must maintain aware- foramen. ness of their orientation and location relative to the described landmarks in order to insure accurate Step 4: Lumbosacral Intervertebral Intertransverse identification of these structures. Joints From the LS intervertebral foramen, continue to Step 6: Sacroiliac Joint move in a lateral direction to cross the LS inter- From the S1 nerve root, move the entire probe in a transverse joint. The joint is identified as a small lateral direction, maintaining a paramedian probe defect in the bone surface (Fig. 3). Center the sur- orientation. The ventral surface of the sacral wing face defect (joint space) in the ultrasound image and has a convex contour, allowing it to be identified. move the probe in a medial to lateral direction while As the probe is moved along the convexity of the maintaining a paramedian probe orientation. This sacrum, a large artery, the caudal gluteal artery, allows for evaluation of the joint margins. will be identified. Immediately dorsal to the caudal gluteal artery, the convex surface of the sacral wing Step 5: S1–2 Intervertebral Foramen will form a junction with another hyperechoic shad- Return to the L6 nerve root at the LS intervertebral owing but flat bone surface. This junction repre- foramen (see Step 3). Move the entire probe in a sents the sacroiliac joint. The caudal gluteal artery caudal direction, maintaining the same probe orien- is used as an acoustic window for evaluation of the tation to identify the S1–2 intervertebral foramen sacroiliac joint margins. Additionally, the ventral and the S1 nerve root. The imaging characteristics sacroiliac ligament can be identified, providing an are similar to the LS intervertebral foramen and the additional landmark for the sacroiliac joint. The 232 2013 ր Vol. 59 ր AAEP PROCEEDINGS DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING Fig. 5. These composite images depict three different grades of alterations in echogenicity and homogenicity in the lumbosacral disc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basic Biomechanics
    Posture analysis • A quick evaluation of structure and function • Doctor views patient from behind (P-A) and from the side (lateral) • References points of patient’s anatomy relative to plumb (a position of balance) 9/3/2013 1 Posture analysis • Lateral View – Knees (anterior, posterior, plumb, genu recurvatum) – Trochanter (anterior, posterior, plumb) – Pelvis (anterior, posterior, neutral pelvic tilt) – Lumbar lordosis (hypo-, hyper-, normal) – Mid-axillary line (anterior, posterior, plumb) – Thoracic kyphosis (hyp-, hyper- normal) – Acromion (anterior, posterior, plumb) – Scapulae (protracted, retracted, normal) – Cervical lordosis (hypo-, hyper-, normal) – External auditory meatus (anterior, posterior, plumb) – Occiput (extended, neutral, flexed) 9/3/2013 2 Posture analysis • Posterior – Anterior View – Feet (pronation, supination, normal) – Achilles tendon (bowed in/out, normal) – Knees (genu valga/vera, normal - internal/external rotation) – Popliteal crease heights (low, high, level) – Trochanter heights (low, high, level) – Iliac crest heights (low on the right/left, normal) – Lumbar scoliosis (right/left, or no signs of) – Thoracic scoliosis (right/left, or no signs of) – Shoulder level (low on the right/left, or normal) – Cervical scoliosis (right/left, or no signs of) – Cervical position (rotation, tilt, neutral) – Mastoid (low on the right/left, or normal) 9/3/2013 3 …..poor postures 9/3/2013 4 Functional Anatomy of the Spine • The vertebral curvatures – Cervical Curve • Anterior convex curve (lordosis) develop in infancy
    [Show full text]
  • Diaphragm and Intercostal Muscles
    Diaphragm and intercostal muscles Dr. Heba Kalbouneh Associate Professor of Anatomy and Histology Skeletal System Adult Human contains 206 Bones 2 parts: Axial skeleton (axis): Skull, Vertebral column, Thoracic cage Appendicular skeleton: Bones of upper limb Bones of lower limb Dr. Heba Kalbouneh Structure of Typical Vertebra Body Vertebral foramen Pedicle Transverse process Spinous process Lamina Dr. Heba Kalbouneh Superior articular process Intervertebral disc Dr. Heba Inferior articular process Dr. Heba Facet joints are between the superior articular process of one vertebra and the inferior articular process of the vertebra directly above it Inferior articular process Superior articular process Dr. Heba Kalbouneh Atypical Vertebrae Atlas (1st cervical vertebra) Axis (2nd cervical vertebra) Dr. Heba Atlas (1st cervical vertebra) Communicates: sup: skull (atlanto-occipital joint) inf: axis (atlanto-axial joint) Atlas (1st cervical vertebra) Characteristics: 1. no body 2. no spinous process 3. ant. & post. arches 4. 2 lateral masses 5. 2 transverse foramina Typical cervical vertebra Specific to the cervical vertebra is the transverse foramen (foramen transversarium). is an opening on each of the transverse processes which gives passage to the vertebral artery Thoracic Cage - Sternum (G, sternon= chest bone) -12 pairs of ribs & costal cartilages -12 thoracic vertebrae Manubrium Body Sternum: Flat bone 3 parts: Xiphoid process Dr. Heba Kalbouneh Dr. Heba Kalbouneh The external intercostal muscle forms the most superficial layer. Its fibers are directed downward and forward from the inferior border of the rib above to the superior border of the rib below The muscle extends forward to the costal cartilage where it is replaced by an aponeurosis, the anterior (external) intercostal membrane Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Anatomy of the Hip RICARDO A
    Applied Anatomy of the Hip RICARDO A. FERNANDEZ, MHS, PT, OCS, CSCS • Northwestern University The hip joint is more than just a ball-and- bones fuse in adults to form the easily recog- socket joint. It supports the weight of the nized “hip” bone. The pelvis, meaning bowl head, arms, and trunk, and it is the primary in Latin, is composed of three structures: the joint that distributes the forces between the innominates, the sacrum, and the coccyx pelvis and lower extremities.1 This joint is (Figure 1). formed from the articu- The ilium has a large flare, or iliac crest, Key PointsPoints lation of the proximal superiorly, with the easily palpable anterior femur with the innomi- superior iliac spine (ASIS) anterior with the The hip joint is structurally composed of nate at the acetabulum. anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) just inferior strong ligamentous and capsular compo- The joint is considered to it. Posteriorly, the crest of the ilium ends nents. important because it to form the posterior superior iliac spine can affect the spine and (PSIS). With respect to surface anatomy, Postural alignment of the bones and joints pelvis proximally and the PSIS is often marked as a dimple in the of the hip plays a role in determining the femur and patella skin. Clinicians attempting to identify pelvic functional gait patterns and forces associ- distally. The biomechan- or hip subluxations, leg-length discrepancies, ated with various supporting structures. ics of this joint are often or postural faults during examinations use There is a relationship between the hip misunderstood, and the these landmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Training on Lumbar Spine Posture and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Active-Duty Marines
    The Effect of Training on Lumbar Spine Posture and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Active-Duty Marines Ana E. Rodriguez-Soto, PhDc, David B. Berry, MScc, Rebecca Jaworski, PhDd,1, Andrew Jensen, MScd,g,2, Christine B. Chung, MDe,f, Brenda Niederberger, MAd,g, Aziza Qadirh, Karen R. Kelly, PT, PhDd,g , Samuel R. Ward, PT, PhDa,b,c aDepartments of Radiology, bOrthopaedic Surgery, and cBioengineering University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive (0610), La Jolla, CA 92093 dDepartment of Warfighter Performance, Naval Health Research Center 140 Sylvester Road, San Diego, CA 92106-3521 eDepartment of Radiology, Veteran Administration San Diego Healthcare System 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161 fDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Medical Center 408 Dickinson Street, San Diego, CA 92103-8226 gSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University ENS Building room 351, 5500 Campanile, San Diego, CA 92182-7251 hVital Imaging Center 5395 Ruffin Rd Suite 100, San Diego CA 92123 Ana Elvira Rodriguez-Soto, PhD E-mail: [email protected] David Barnes Berry, MS E-mail: [email protected] Rebecca Jaworski, PhD E-mail: [email protected] Present Address: 1Office of the Naval Inspector General 1254 9th St. SE, Washington Navy Yard, DC 90374-5006 Andrew Jensen, MS E-mail: [email protected] Present address: 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California PED 107 3560 Watt Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0652 Christine B. Chung, MD E-mail: [email protected] Brenda Niederberger, MA E-mail: [email protected] Aziza Qadir E-mail: [email protected] Karen R.
    [Show full text]
  • Epithelia Joitns
    NAME LOCATION STRUCTURE FUNCTION MOVEMENT Temporomandibular joint Condylar head of ramus of Synovial Diarthrosis Modified hinge joint mandible and glenoid fossa of Rotation and gliding temporal bone Biaxial Zygapophyseal joint Between articular processes of Synovial Diarthrosis Gliding 2 adjacent vertebrae Non axial Atlanto-Occipital joints Atlas and occipital condyle of Synovial Diarthrosis Ellipsoid occipital bone Biaxial Atlantoaxial joints Atlas and axis Synovial Diarthrosis Pivot Uniaxial Joints of vertebral arches Ligaments Fibrous Amphiarthrosis Syndesmoses Intervertebral symphyseal Intervertebral disk between 2 Cartilaginous Amphiarthrosis joints vertebrae Symphysis Costovertebral Head of ribs and body of Synovial Diarthrosis Gliding thoracic vertebra Non axial Costotrasnverse joints Tubercle of rib and transverse Synovial Diarthrosis Gliding process of thoracic vertebra Non axial Lumbosacral Joint Left and right zygopophyseal Laterally Synovial joint Intervertebral symphyseal joint Symphysis SternoclavicularJoint Clavicular notch articulates Synovial Diarthrosis Gliding with medial ends of clavicle Non Axial Manubriosternal Joint Hyaline cartilage junction Cartilaginous Synarthrosis Sternal Angle between manubrium and body Symphysis Xiphisternal Joint Cartilage between xiphoid Synchondrosis Synarthrosis process and body Synostoses Sternocostal Joint (1st) Costocartilage 1 with sternum Cartilaginous Synchondrosis Synarthrosis NAME Location Section Anterior longitudinal runs down anterior surface of vertebral body Vertebral column ligament Posterior longitudinal in canal, runs down posterior surface of vertebral body ligament Interspinous ligament Connects spinous processes Ligamentum flavum Connects laminae ! Intra-articular Disc Between articulating surface of sternum and clavicle Sternoclavicular Joint Costoclavicular ligament 1st rib to clavicle !.
    [Show full text]
  • Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Status in Cervical Spine Bilateral Facet Dislocations
    Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty Papers Department of Orthopaedic Surgery November 2005 Posterior longitudinal ligament status in cervical spine bilateral facet dislocations John A. Carrino Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women's Hospital Geoffrey L. Manton Thomas Jefferson University Hospital William B. Morrison Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Alex R. Vaccaro Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and The Rothman Institute Mark E. Schweitzer New York University & Hospital for Joint Diseases Follow this and additional works at: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/orthofp Part of the Orthopedics Commons LetSee next us page know for additional how authors access to this document benefits ouy Recommended Citation Carrino, John A.; Manton, Geoffrey L.; Morrison, William B.; Vaccaro, Alex R.; Schweitzer, Mark E.; and Flanders, Adam E., "Posterior longitudinal ligament status in cervical spine bilateral facet dislocations" (2005). Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty Papers. Paper 3. https://jdc.jefferson.edu/orthofp/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital Commons. The Jefferson Digital Commons is a service of Thomas Jefferson University's Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). The Commons is a showcase for Jefferson books and journals, peer-reviewed scholarly publications, unique historical collections from the University archives, and teaching tools. The Jefferson Digital Commons allows researchers and interested readers anywhere in the world to learn about and keep up to date with Jefferson scholarship. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of the Jefferson Digital Commons. For more information, please contact: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction a Case Study
    NOR200188.qxd 3/8/11 9:53 PM Page 126 Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction A Case Study CPT William Murray Pain is a widespread issue in the United States. Nine of physical therapist. She was evaluated and her treatment 10 Americans regularly suffer from pain, and nearly every consisted of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimula- person will experience low back pain at one point in their lives. tion unit while in the PT clinic, aqua therapy, and ice Undertreated or unrelieved pain costs more than and heat application. $60 billion a year from decreased productivity, lost income, After several weeks, Ms. T returned to the primary care and medical expenses. The ability to diagnose and provide ap- provider and informed her that the pain has not decreased and “feels like that it is getting worse.” She also informed propriate medical treatment is imperative. This case study ex- the provider that she was having difficulty sleeping and amines a 23-year-old Active Duty woman who is preparing to constantly feeling tired secondary to pain. Throughout the be involuntarily released from military duty for an easily cor- next several months, the primary care provider tried nu- rectable medical condition. She has complained of chronic low merous medication trials with no relief for the patient. Ms. back pain that radiates into her hip and down her leg since ex- T gives a history of being prescribed numerous medica- periencing a work-related injury. She has been seen by numer- tions within several drug classifications. She stated vari- ous providers for the previous 11 months before being referred ous side effects that are related to the medications and to the chronic pain clinic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure and Movement of Clarinet Playing D.M.A
    The Structure and Movement of Clarinet Playing D.M.A. DOCUMENT Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Musical Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sheri Lynn Rolf, M.D. Graduate Program in Music The Ohio State University 2018 D.M.A. Document Committee: Dr. Caroline A. Hartig, Chair Dr. David Hedgecoth Professor Katherine Borst Jones Dr. Scott McCoy Copyrighted by Sheri Lynn Rolf, M.D. 2018 Abstract The clarinet is a complex instrument that blends wood, metal, and air to create some of the world’s most beautiful sounds. Its most intricate component, however, is the human who is playing it. While the clarinet has 24 tone holes and 17 or 18 keys, the human body has 205 bones, around 700 muscles, and nearly 45 miles of nerves. A seemingly endless number of exercises and etudes are available to improve technique, but almost no one comments on how to best use the body in order to utilize these studies to maximum effect while preventing injury. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the interactions of the clarinet with the body of the person playing it. Emphasis will be placed upon the musculoskeletal system, recognizing that playing the clarinet is an activity that ultimately involves the entire body. Aspects of the skeletal system as they relate to playing the clarinet will be described, beginning with the axial skeleton. The extremities and their musculoskeletal relationships to the clarinet will then be discussed. The muscles responsible for the fine coordinated movements required for successful performance on the clarinet will be described.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy and Function of the Equine Thoracolumbar Longissimus Dorsi Muscle
    Aus dem Veterinärwissenschaftlichen Department der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Lehrstuhl für Anatomie, Histologie und Embryologie Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Dr. Fred Sinowatz Arbeit angefertigt unter der Leitung von Dr. Renate Weller, PhD, MRCVS The Anatomy and Function of the equine thoracolumbar Longissimus dorsi muscle Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der tiermedizinischen Doktorwürde der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Vorgelegt von Christina Carla Annette von Scheven aus Düsseldorf München 2010 2 Gedruckt mit der Genehmigung der Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Dekan: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Joachim Braun Berichterstatter: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Johann Maierl Korreferentin: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Bettina Wollanke Tag der Promotion: 24. Juli 2010 3 Für meine Familie 4 Table of Contents I. Introduction................................................................................................................ 8 II. Literature review...................................................................................................... 10 II.1 Macroscopic anatomy ............................................................................................. 10 II.1.1 Comparative evolution of the body axis ............................................................ 10 II.1.2 Axis of the equine body ..................................................................................... 12 II.1.2.1 Vertebral column of the horse....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Treatment Sacroiliac Joint Pain | Blue Cross NC
    Corporate Medical Policy Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain File Name: diagnosis_and_treatment_of_sacroiliac_joint_pain Origination: 8/2010 Last CAP Review: 4/2021 Next CAP Review: 4/2022 Last Review: 4/2021 Description of Procedure or Service Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthrography using fluoroscopic guidance with injection of an anesthetic has been explored as a diagnostic test for sacroiliac joint pain. Duplication of the patient’s pain pattern with the injection of contrast medium suggests a sacroiliac etiology, as does relief of chronic back pain with injection of local anesthetic. Treatment of sacroiliac joint pain with corticosteroids, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), stabilization, or minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion has also been explored. Similar to other structures in the spine, it is assumed that the sacroiliac joint may be a source of low back pain. In fact, prior to 1928, the sacroiliac joint was thought to be the most common cause of sciatica. In 1928, the role of the intervertebral disc was elucidated, and from that point forward the sacroiliac joint received less research attention. Research into sacroiliac joint pain has been plagued by lack of a criterion standard to measure its prevalence and against which various clinical examinations can be validated. For example, sacroiliac joint pain is typically without any consistent, demonstrable radiographic or laboratory features and most commonly exists in the setting of morphologically normal joints. Clinical tests for sacroiliac joint pain may include various movement tests, palpation to detect tenderness, and pain descriptions by the patient. Further confounding the study of the sacroiliac joint is that multiple structures, such as posterior facet joints and lumbar discs, may refer pain to the area surrounding the sacroiliac joint.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumbar Degenerative Disease Part 1
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Lumbar Degenerative Disease Part 1: Anatomy and Pathophysiology of Intervertebral Discogenic Pain and Radiofrequency Ablation of Basivertebral and Sinuvertebral Nerve Treatment for Chronic Discogenic Back Pain: A Prospective Case Series and Review of Literature 1, , 1,2, 1 Hyeun Sung Kim y * , Pang Hung Wu y and Il-Tae Jang 1 Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul, Spine Surgery, Seoul 06048, Korea; [email protected] (P.H.W.); [email protected] (I.-T.J.) 2 National University Health Systems, Juronghealth Campus, Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore 609606, Singapore * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-6003-9767; Fax.: +82-2-3445-9755 These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 31 January 2020; Accepted: 20 February 2020; Published: 21 February 2020 Abstract: Degenerative disc disease is a leading cause of chronic back pain in the aging population in the world. Sinuvertebral nerve and basivertebral nerve are postulated to be associated with the pain pathway as a result of neurotization. Our goal is to perform a prospective study using radiofrequency ablation on sinuvertebral nerve and basivertebral nerve; evaluating its short and long term effect on pain score, disability score and patients’ outcome. A review in literature is done on the pathoanatomy, pathophysiology and pain generation pathway in degenerative disc disease and chronic back pain. 30 patients with 38 levels of intervertebral disc presented with discogenic back pain with bulging degenerative intervertebral disc or spinal stenosis underwent Uniportal Full Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation application through either Transforaminal or Interlaminar Endoscopic Approaches. Their preoperative characteristics are recorded and prospective data was collected for Visualized Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and MacNab Criteria for pain were evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biomechanical Model of the Lumbosacral Joint During Lifting Activities
    A BIOMECHANICAL MODEL OF THE LUMBOSACRAL JOINT DURING LIFTING ACTIVITIES CHARLES K. ANDERSON,* DON B. CHAFF1N.t GARY D. HERRINt and LARRY S. MATTHEWS% *Back Systems, Inc., 5495 Beltline Road, Suite 390, Dallas, TX 75240. U.S.A.; t Center for Ergonomics. Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.; SC4002 Outpatient Building, Box 054. University Hospital, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. U.S.A. Abstract-A biomechanical model of the lumbosacral region was constructed for the purpose of systematically studying the combined stresses and strains on the local ligaments, muscles and disc tissue during sagittal plane two-handed lifting. The model was validated in two ways. The first validation was a comparison ofexperimental study results with model predictions. In general predictions compared very reasonably with observed values of several authors with the exception of strain predictions on the articular ligaments. Second, a sensitivity analysis was performed over a wide range of lifting tasks. The predicted stress/strain values followed anticipated patterns and were of reasonable magnitudes. On the basis of the results of the sensitivity analysis it was concluded that typical lifting tasks can lead to excessive disc compressive forces, muscle moment generation requirements, and possibly lumbodorsal fascia strains. Conversely, annulus rupture of a healthy disc due to overstrain appears very unlikely. INTRODUCLION sacral endplate and strain in the posterior aspect of the outermost layer of the annulus. These tissue load The prevalence and cost of industrially-related low parameters were selected on the basis of their purpor- back pain underscores the need for a better under- ted role in the genesis of low-back pain.
    [Show full text]