DOCSLIB.ORG

The Brass Check a Study of American Journalism by Upton Sinclair

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Digitized for Project Gutenberg by Jane Rutledge ([email protected]) on behalf of Friends of Libraries USA (http://www.folusa.org) and Betsy Connor Bowen (http://journal.maine.com/lore/loonalone/) on behalf of TeleRead (http://www.teleread.org). This is a preview version—not an official Gutenberg one. Questions? Contact David Rothman at [email protected]. July 16, 2003 The Brass Check A Study of American Journalism By Upton Sinclair Who owns the press, and why? When you read your daily paper, are you reading facts, or propaganda? And whose propaganda? Who furnishes the raw material for your thoughts about life? Is it honest material? No man can ask more important questions than those; and here for the first time the questions are answered in a book. ===========End of Cover Copy=========== Published by the Author Pasadena, California ====================== PART 1: THE EVIDENCE --- I. The Story of the Brass Check Sinclair, The Brass Check, p.2 of 412 II. The Story of a Poet III. Open Sesame! IV. The Real Fight V. The Condemned Meat Industry VI. An Adventure with Roosevelt VII. Jackals and a Carcase VIII. The Last Act IX. Aiming at the Public's Heart X. A Voice from Russia XI. A Venture in Co-operation XII. The Village Horse-Doctor XIII. In High Society XIV. The Great Panic XV. Shredded Wheat Biscuit XVI. An Interview on Marriage XVII. "Gaming" on the Sabbath XVIII. An Essential Monogamist XIX. In the Lion's Den XX. The Story of a Lynching XXI. Journalism and Burglary XXII. A Millionaire and an Author XXIII. The "Heart-Wife" XXIV. The Mourning Pickets XXV. The Case of the Associated Press XXVI. A Governor and His Lie XXVII. The Associated Press at the Bar XXVIII. The Associated Press and Its Newspapers XXIX. The Scandal-Bureau XXX. The Concrete Wall XXXI. Making Bomb-Makers XXXII. The Roof-Garden of the World XXXIII. A Fountain of Poison XXXIV. The Daily Cat-and-Dog Fight --- PART II: THE EXPLANATION --- XXXV. The Causes of Things XXXVI. The Empire of Business XXXVII. The Dregs of the Cup XXXVIII. Owning the Press XXXIX. The War-Makers XL. Owning the Owners XLI. The Owner in Politics XLII. Owning the Associated Press XLIII. The Owner and His Advertisers XLIV. The Advertising Boycott Page 2 Sinclair, The Brass Check, p.3 of 412 XLV. The Advertising Ecstasy XLVI. The Bribe Direct XLVII. The Bribe Wholesale XLVIII. Poison Ivy XLIX. The Elbert Hubbard Worm L. The Press and Public Welfare LI. The Press and the Radicals LII. The Press and the Socialists LIII. The Press and Sex LIV. The Press and Crime LV. The Press and Jack London LVI. The Press and Labor LVII. The Associated Press and Labor LVIII. "Poisoned at the Source" LIX. The Press and the War LX. The Case of Russia LXI. "Bolshevism" in America PART III: THE REMEDY --- LXII. Cutting the Tiger Claws LXIII. The Mental Munition-Factory LXIV. The Problem of the Reporter LXV. The Press Set Free LXVI. A Frame-up That Fell Down --- Conclusion A Practical Program Publisher's Note A LETTER FOR THE TIME VILLENEUVE, SWITZERLAND, Monday, Oct. 6, 1919 My Dear Confrere: I am happy to see you always so burning with energy, but your next book prepares for you some rude combats. It requires a bold courage to dare, when one is alone, to attack the monster, the new Minotaur, to which the entire world renders tribute: the Press. I return to Paris in a few weeks. Reaction there holds the center of the walk. It speaks already as master, and perhaps it will be master before the end of the winter. The wave of counter-revolution, of counter-liberty, passes over the Page 3 Sinclair, The Brass Check, p.4 of 412 world. It will drown more than one among us, but it will retire, and our ideas will conquer. Very cordially I press your hand. ROMAIN ROLLAND. INTRODUCTORY The social body to which we belong is at this moment passing through one of the greatest crises of its history, a colossal process which may best be likened to a birth. We have each of us a share in this process, we are to a greater or less extent responsible for its course. To make our judgments, we must have reports from other parts of the social body; we must know what our fellow-men, in all classes of society, in all parts of the world, are suffering, planning, doing. There arise emergencies which require swift decisions, under penalty of frightful waste and suffering. What if the nerves upon which we depend for knowledge of this social body should give us false reports of its condition? The first half of this book tells a personal story: the story of one man's experiences with American Journalism. This personal feature is not pleasant, but it is unavoidable. If I were taking the witness-chair in a court of justice, the jury would not ask for my general sentiments and philosophic opinions; they would not ask what other people had told me, or what was common report; the thing they would wish to know--the only thing they would be allowed to know--is what I had personally seen and experienced. So now, taking the witness-stand in the case of the American public versus Journalism, I tell what I have personally seen and experienced. I take the oath of a witness: the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God. After this pledge, earnestly given and earnestly meant, the reader must either believe me, or he must exclude me from the company of civilized men. My motive in writing this book is not to defend myself. We live in a time of such concentrated agony and peril that a man who would waste ink and paper on a defense of his own personality would be contemptible. What I tell you is: "Look! Here is American Journalism! Here is what it did to one man, systematically, persistently, deliberately, for a period of twenty years. Here are names, places, dates--such Page 4 Sinclair, The Brass Check, p.5 of 412 a mass of material as you cannot doubt, you cannot evade. Here is the whole thing, inside and out. Here are your sacred names, the very highest of your gods. When you have read this story, you will know our Journalism; you will know the body and soul of it, you will know it in such a way that you will not have to be told what it is doing to the movement for industrial freedom and self-government all over the world." In the second half of the book you will hear a host of other witnesses--several score of them, the wisest and truest and best people of our country. They are in every part of our country, in every class and every field of public life; and when you have heard their experiences, told for the most part in their own words, you must grant my claim concerning this book--that it is a book of facts. There are no mistakes in it, no guesses, no surmises; there are no lapses of memory, no inaccuracies. There are only facts. You must understand that I have had this book in mind for twenty years. For twelve years I have been deliberately collecting the documents and preserving the records, and I have these before me as I write. In a few cases of personal experiences I have relied upon my memory; but that memory is vivid, because the incidents were painful, they were seared into my soul, and now, as I recall them, I see the faces of the people, I hear their very tones. Where there is any doubt or vagueness in my recollection, or where there is hearsay testimony, I state the fact explicitly; otherwise, I wish the reader to understand that the incidents happened as I say they happened, and that upon the truth of every statement in this book I pledge my honor as a man and my reputation as a writer. One final word: In this book I have cast behind me the proprieties usually held sacred; I have spared no one, I have narrated shameful things. I have done this, not because I have any pleasure in scandal; I have not such pleasure, being by nature impersonal. I do not hate one living being. The people I have lashed in this book are to me not individuals, but social forces; I have exposed them, not because they lied about me, but because a new age of fraternity is trying to be born, and they, who ought to be assisting the birth, are strangling the child in the womb. PART I: THE EVIDENCE Page 5 Sinclair, The Brass Check, p.6 of 412 CHAPTER ONE: THE STORY OF THE BRASS CHECK Once upon a time there was a little boy; a nice little boy, whom you would have liked if you had known him--at least, so his mother says. He had been brought up in the traditions of the old South, to which the two most important things in the world were good cooking and good manners. He obeyed his mother and father, and ate his peas with a fork, and never buttered the whole slice of his bread. On Sunday mornings he carefully shined his shoes and brushed his clothes at the window, and got into a pair of tight kid gloves and under a tight little brown derby hat, and walked with his parents to a church on Fifth Avenue.
Recommended publications
  • Ida M. Tarbell and the Rise of Documentary Evidence

    Ida M. Tarbell and the Rise of Documentary Evidence

    UNIVERSITY-WIDE RESEARCH GRANTS FOR LIBRARIANS COVER SHEET NOTE: Grant proposals are confidential until funding decisions are made. INSTRUCTIONS: The applicant(s) must submit two (2) copies of their application packet. The application packet consists of the Cover Sheet and the Proposal. Applicants send 1 (one) printed copy of their application packet, with signatures, to the Chair of the divisional research committee, who forwards the packet to the Chair of the university-wide Research and Professional Development Committee. Applicants send the second copy of their application packet as an email attachment to the Chair of the divisional research committee who forwards it on to the Chair of the university-wide Research and Professional Development Committee. Date of Application: 12 January, 2011 Title of Proposal/Project: “Prepared Entirely From Documents and Contemporaneous Records”: Ida M. Tarbell and the Rise of Documentary Evidence in Journalism Expected Length of Project : 1 week for the archival research, 5 months to finish paper Total Funds Requested from LAUC University-Wide Research Funds: $1,924 Primary Applicant Your Name (include your signature on the paper copy): Dawn Schmitz Academic Rank and Working Title: Associate Librarian III, Archivist Bargaining Unit Member/Non-Member: Member Campus Surface Mail Address: P.O. Box 19557 Irvine, CA 92623-9557 Zot Code: 8100 Telephone and Email Address: 949-824-4935, [email protected] URL for home campus directory (will be used for link on LAUC University-Wide Funded Research Grants web page): http://directory.uci.edu/ Co-Applicant(s) 1 Name: Academic Rank and Working Title: Bargaining Unit Member/Non-Member: Campus Surface Mail Address: Telephone and Email Address: Proposal Abstract (not to exceed 250 words): This proposal is for funding to complete archival research for a paper that explores the early development of the use of public and corporate records in American investigative reporting.
  • Should Socialism Prevail

    Should Socialism Prevail

    ShouldSocialism Prevail , A DEBATE BETWEEN AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE ProfessorScott Nearing Rev. Dr. John L. Relford Mr. Morris Hillquit Prof. FrederickM. Davenport PUBLISHED BY Rand School of Social Science AND New York Call Rudy SocialismBy Correspondence You can get a thorough knowledge of Socialism and its application to Social Problems if you will study OUI courses by mail. Sent weekly to you, these lessons form a systematic course of study at a nominal fee: Form a class of students of any size and we will tell you how to conduct it. If youcannot form a class, take it by yourself. Three Courses are now available: Elements of Socialism-twelve lessons. Social History and Economics-twenty-two lessons, Social Problems and Socialist Policy-twelve lessons. Send for bulletin with complete description to Rand School of Social Science 140 East 19th Street New York City ShouldSocialism Prevail? A DEBATE HELD OCTOBER 21, 1915 BROOKLYN. NEW YORK . Under the Auspices of THE BROOKLYN INSfITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES, SUBJECT:- Resolved,,thirt Socialism ,ought to prevail in the United States. AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE Professor Scott Nearing Rev. Dr. John L. Belford Mr. Morris Hillquit Professor Frederick M. Davenport J. Herbert Lowe, Chairman Edited by William M. Feigenbaum Published by The Rand School of Social Science. New York, 1916 ,,\,: . _ *-?-:, _.. s-1’ -’ Kand School of Social Science Xc-x York City Introductory Note I ., , On the 21st of October, 1915, tbere \?ras held undeF.‘t& aus- pices of the Brooklyn Institute of Arts ,ana Sciences a &bate on the subject: “Resolved: that Socialism ought to prevail in the United States.” The Institute had under way the inauguration of a Public Fbrum for the discussion of important matters of pub- lic interest.
  • The Depiction of Women and Slavery in Margaret Mitchell's

    The Depiction of Women and Slavery in Margaret Mitchell's

    “Tomorrow is Another Day”: The Depiction of Women and Slavery in Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind and Robert Hicks’ The Widow of the South. Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter I: Before the Civil War ........................................................................................ 5 Chapter II: During the Civil War .................................................................................... 12 Chapter III: After the Civil War ..................................................................................... 23 Conclusion..………………………………………………………………………….....31 Works Cited……………………………………………………………………………34 1 Introduction Gone with the Wind and The Widow of the South are both Civil War novels written by first time writers. Margaret Mitchell‘s Gone with the Wind was published in 1936 and Robert Hicks‘ The Widow of the South was published in 2005. These two novels are written nearly seventy years apart. The protagonists of these two Civil War novels are very different, but still it is worth taking a look at the difference in attitude that the two novelists have in regard to women and slavery in the seventy-year span between the two novels. It is interesting to take a closer look at the portrayal by the two authors of the kind of lives these women lived, and what similarities and differences can be seen in the protagonists as pertaining to their education and upbringing. Also, how the women‘s lives were affected by living in a society which condoned slave ownership. The Civil War brought about changes in the women‘s lives both during its course and in its aftermath. Not only were the lives of the women affected but that of the slaves as well. The authors, through their writing, depicted aspects of the institution of slavery, especially how the slave hierarchy worked and what made one slave ―better‖ than the next.
  • NEW YORK TIMES BUILDING, 41 Park Row (Aka 39-43 Park Row and 147-151 Nassau Street), Manhattan

    NEW YORK TIMES BUILDING, 41 Park Row (Aka 39-43 Park Row and 147-151 Nassau Street), Manhattan

    Landmarks Preservation Commission March 16, 1999, Designation List 303 LP-2031 (FORMER) NEW YORK TIMES BUILDING, 41 Park Row (aka 39-43 Park Row and 147-151 Nassau Street), Manhattan. Built 1888-89; George B. Post, architect; enlarged 1903-05, Robert Maynicke, architect. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 101 , Lot 2. On December 15, 1998, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the (former) New York Times Bu ilding and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Three witnesses, representing the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Municipal Art Society, and the Historic Districts Council , spoke in favor of the designation. The hearing was re-opened on February 23 , 1999 for additional testimony from the owner, Pace University. Two representatives of Pace spoke, indicating that the university was not opposed to designation and looked forward to working with the Commission staff in regard to future plans for the building. The Commission has also received letters from Dr. Sarah Bradford Landau and Robert A.M. Stern in support of designation. This item had previously been heard for designation as an individual Landmark in 1966 (LP-0550) and in 1980 as part of the proposed Civic Center Hi storic District (LP-1125). Summary This sixteen-story office building, constructed as the home of the New York Times , is one of the last survivors of Newspaper Row, the center of newspaper publishing in New York City from the 1830s to the 1920s.
  • READING JOHN STEINBECK ^ Jboctor of $Iitldfi

    READING JOHN STEINBECK ^ Jboctor of $Iitldfi

    DECONSTRUCTING AMERICA: READING JOHN STEINBECK ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF ^ JBoctor of $IitlDfi;opI)p IN ENGLISH \ BY MANISH SINGH UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DR. MADIHUR REHMAN DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2013 Abstract The first chapter of the thesis, "The Path to Doom: America from Idea to Reality;'" takes the journey of America from its conception as an idea to its reality. The country that came into existence as a colony of Great Britain and became a refuge of the exploited and the persecuted on one hand and of the outlaws on other hand, soon transformed into a giant machine of exploitation, persecution and lawlessness, it is surprising to see how the noble ideas of equality, liberty and democracy and pursuit of happiness degenerated into callous profiteering. Individuals insensitive to the needs and happiness of others and arrogance based on a sense of racial superiority even before they take root in the virgin soil of the Newfoundland. The effects cf this degenerate ideology are felt not only by the Non-White races within America and the less privileged countries of the third world, but even by the Whites within America. The concepts of equality, freedom, democracy and pursuit of happiness were manufactured and have been exploited by the American ruling class.The first one to experience the crawling effects of the Great American Dream were original inhabitants of America, the Red Indians and later Blacks who were uprooted from their home and hearth and taken to America as slaves.
  • The Triumph and Anguish of the Russian Revolution: Bessie Beatty's

    The Triumph and Anguish of the Russian Revolution: Bessie Beatty's

    The Triumph and Anguish of the Russian Revolution: Bessie Beatty’s Forgotten Chronicle Lyubov Ginzburg … only time will be able to attribute both the political and the social revolution their true values. Bessie Beatty, the Bulletin, 25 September 1917 The centennial of the Russian Revolution celebrated two and a half years ago has been marked by a pronounced revival of interest in its origins and impact upon modern history all over the globe. The occasion presented an opportunity to revisit the unprecedented social and political upheaval that convulsed the country in 1917, defined the world order for much of the twentieth century, and continues to reverberate in Russian national and international politics to this day. Along with countless newly revealed primary sources which have gradually found their way into the public domain, this event has been encrusted with novel meanings spawned within a growing number of discourses previously excluded from his- torical scrutiny. An example of such a disparity would be an unfortunate slight to gendered narratives in the understanding and interpretation of one of the most controversial social experiments in human history. In spite of the fact that, as with their male counterparts, foreign female correspondents became chroniclers, witnesses, and, in some instances, participants in the thrilling social drama, there have been few references to their representation of the Revolution(s) in its histori- ography.1 Meanwhile, compelled to understanding Russia, while informing com- 1 Although disproportionally less than their men-authored counterparts, women’s narratives have previously sparked some occasional interest among historians and scholars of journalism and women studies.
  • The December 2012 Shofar

    The December 2012 Shofar

    The December 2012 Shofar Temple Beth El, 3 Marion Avenue, Glens Falls, New York 12801 (518) 792-4364 * [email protected] * www.TempleBethEl-gfny.com Affiliate member of the URJ since 1950 Close the Gap! Chanukah at Inside this issue: Temple Beth El Tasteful Traditions 2 This year's Project 21st Century campaign for building improvements is off to an Temple Beth El invites you to a Cooper’s Cave 2 outstanding start, with contributions Family Chanukah Service and Dinner received even before the pledge forms were Judaica Shop 2 catered by distributed! Although the fund-raising drive Entertainment Books 2 does not end until June 30, 2013, the close Monahan Chase Caterers of the Temple fiscal year, more than $1,500 on Spelling of Chanukah 2 has already been contributed. Friday, December 14, 2012 at 6 p.m. Blessings in a Bag 2 Remember that we have been offered a MENU: Don’t Be That 3 dollar-for-dollar matching grant of up to Brisket, Roasted Chicken, Latkes, Roasted $15,000, for pledges received by December Person! Sweet Potatoes, Chick Pea Salad, 15, 2012, with at least 25% per cent paid & Green Salad Crafter’s Club 3 by December 31. If you are in a position to meet these conditions, your gift is worth Your payment is your reservation: Chai Society 3 twice as much. If we can raise $15,000 in Adults: $18 per person Rabbi’s Message 4 pledges by the 15th, our goal of $30,000 is Children Ages 4-10: $12 per person achieved! Rabbi’s Classes 4 Children Age 3 and Under: Free Temple Beth El is counting on you.
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form

    Form No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS I NAME HISTORIC Ochs Building or Times Building AND/OR COMMON Dome Building I LOCATION STREET«t NUMBER Georgia Avenue _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Chattanooga VICINITY OF Third STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Tennessee 47 Hamilton 065 - CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT —PUBLIC —OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM .^BUILDING(S) ^.PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED 2LCOMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH X.WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE _SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS —X.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED —YES. UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME North American Royalties, Inc. STREET & NUMBER 200 East Eighth Street CITY. TOWN „ STATE Chattanooga VICINITY OF Tennessee ! LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS/ETC. Hamilton County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER Georgia Avenue CITY, TOWN STATE Chattanooga Tennessee TITLE Chattanooga-Hamilton County Historical and Architectural Survey DATE 1977 —FEDERAL —STATE X.COUNTY X.LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission CITY, TOWN STATE Chattanooga Tennessee DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE ^EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED —GOOD —RUINS JLALTERED —MOVED DATE. —FAIR —UNEXPOSED The Dome Building's richly decorated exterior is an imposing example of Italian Renaissance Revival architecture. This six-story office building (plus basement and cupola) gives an overall sense of verticality through two techniques: vertical lines that lead the eye upward, and floors that become progressively more decorative as they near the top.
  • Demonizing Unions: Religious Rhetoric in the Early 20Th

    Demonizing Unions: Religious Rhetoric in the Early 20Th

    DEMONIZING UNIONS: RELIGIOUS RHETORIC IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN STRIKE NOVEL A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by David Michael Cosca August 2019 © David Michael Cosca DEMONIZING UNIONS: RELIGIOUS RHETORIC IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN STRIKE NOVEL David Michael Cosca, Ph. D. Cornell University 2019 Demonizing Unions uncovers the significance of a Biblical idiom in American novels portraying violent labor conflicts from the 1910s to the 1930s. I reveal the different ways that Upton Sinclair’s King Coal and The Coal War, Mary Heaton Vorse’s Strike!, and Ruth McKenney’s Industrial Valley employ a Biblical motif both to emphasize the God-like power of Capital over society, and to critique an emergent socio-political faith in business power. The texts I examine demonstrate how it was clear to industrialists in the early 20th century that physical violence was losing its efficacy. Therefore, much of the brunt of the physical conflict in labor struggles could be eased by waging a war of ideas to turn public opinion into an additional, ultimately more powerful, weapon against the potential of organized labor. I argue that in these texts, the besmearing of the discontented workers as violent dupes of “outside agitators,” rather than regular folks with economic grievances, takes on Biblical proportions. In turn, these authors utilize Biblical stories oriented around conceptions of power and hierarchy to illuminate the potential of ordinary humans to effect their own liberation. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH David Cosca grew up in Santa Maria, CA.
  • John Ahouse-Upton Sinclair Collection, 1895-2014

    John Ahouse-Upton Sinclair Collection, 1895-2014

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8cn764d No online items INVENTORY OF THE JOHN AHOUSE-UPTON SINCLAIR COLLECTION, 1895-2014, Finding aid prepared by Greg Williams California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives & Special Collections University Library, Room 5039 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3895 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html ©2014 INVENTORY OF THE JOHN "Consult repository." 1 AHOUSE-UPTON SINCLAIR COLLECTION, 1895-2014, Descriptive Summary Title: John Ahouse-Upton Sinclair Collection Dates: 1895-2014 Collection Number: "Consult repository." Collector: Ahouse, John B. Extent: 12 linear feet, 400 books Repository: California State University, Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections Archives & Special Collection University Library, Room 5039 1000 E. Victoria Street Carson, California 90747 Phone: (310) 243-3013 URL: http://www.csudh.edu/archives/csudh/index.html Abstract: This collection consists of 400 books, 12 linear feet of archival items and resource material about Upton Sinclair collected by bibliographer John Ahouse, author of Upton Sinclair, A Descriptive Annotated Bibliography . Included are Upton Sinclair books, pamphlets, newspaper articles, publications, circular letters, manuscripts, and a few personal letters. Also included are a wide variety of subject files, scholarly or popular articles about Sinclair, videos, recordings, and manuscripts for Sinclair biographies. Included are Upton Sinclair’s A Monthly Magazine, EPIC Newspapers and the Upton Sinclair Quarterly Newsletters. Language: Collection material is primarily in English Access There are no access restrictions on this collection. Publication Rights All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Director of Archives and Special Collections.
  • The Pulitzer Prize for Fiction Honors a Distinguished Work of Fiction by an American Author, Preferably Dealing with American Life

    The Pulitzer Prize for Fiction Honors a Distinguished Work of Fiction by an American Author, Preferably Dealing with American Life

    Pulitzer Prize Winners Named after Hungarian newspaper publisher Joseph Pulitzer, the Pulitzer Prize for fiction honors a distinguished work of fiction by an American author, preferably dealing with American life. Chosen from a selection of 800 titles by five letter juries since 1918, the award has become one of the most prestigious awards in America for fiction. Holdings found in the library are featured in red. 2017 The Underground Railroad by Colson Whitehead 2016 The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen 2015 All the Light we Cannot See by Anthony Doerr 2014 The Goldfinch by Donna Tartt 2013: The Orphan Master’s Son by Adam Johnson 2012: No prize (no majority vote reached) 2011: A visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer Egan 2010:Tinkers by Paul Harding 2009:Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout 2008:The Brief and Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Diaz 2007:The Road by Cormac McCarthy 2006:March by Geraldine Brooks 2005 Gilead: A Novel, by Marilynne Robinson 2004 The Known World by Edward Jones 2003 Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides 2002 Empire Falls by Richard Russo 2001 The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay by Michael Chabon 2000 Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri 1999 The Hours by Michael Cunningham 1998 American Pastoral by Philip Roth 1997 Martin Dressler: The Tale of an American Dreamer by Stephan Milhauser 1996 Independence Day by Richard Ford 1995 The Stone Diaries by Carol Shields 1994 The Shipping News by E. Anne Proulx 1993 A Good Scent from a Strange Mountain by Robert Olen Butler 1992 A Thousand Acres by Jane Smiley
  • European Journal of American Studies, 8-1 | 2013 What’S the Matter with Benjamin O

    European Journal of American Studies, 8-1 | 2013 What’S the Matter with Benjamin O

    European journal of American studies 8-1 | 2013 Spring 2013 What’s the matter with Benjamin O. Flower? Populism, antimonopoly politics and the “paranoid style” at the turn of the century Jean-Louis Marin-Lamellet Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/10086 DOI: 10.4000/ejas.10086 ISSN: 1991-9336 Publisher European Association for American Studies Electronic reference Jean-Louis Marin-Lamellet, “What’s the matter with Benjamin O. Flower?”, European journal of American studies [Online], 8-1 | 2013, Online since 06 September 2013, connection on 08 July 2021. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/ejas/10086 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.10086 This text was automatically generated on 8 July 2021. Creative Commons License What’s the matter with Benjamin O. Flower? 1 What’s the matter with Benjamin O. Flower? Populism, antimonopoly politics and the “paranoid style” at the turn of the century Jean-Louis Marin-Lamellet 1 As an editor of several magazines and a publisher, Boston reformer Benjamin Orange Flower (1858-1918, figure 1) publicized and advocated many Progressive and radical causes of his times: Populism, woman suffrage, direct legislation, public ownership of utilities, public works for the unemployed, railroad regulation and temperance to name but a few examples.1 In the 1910s, he denounced the “medical monopolies” that wanted to crush alternative medicine. At the end of his life, he also edited a widely-circulated anti-Catholic newspaper, The Menace. Flower exemplified “how men of this era thought in strange theoretical combinations” and opened the pages of his magazines to all the unorthodox ideas of his times, thus acquiring the reputation of a “radical crank.”2 He believed that his editorial policy should illustrate the American spirit of freedom; the intense intellectual activity would then be conducive to reforms.3 European journal of American studies, 8-1 | 2013 What’s the matter with Benjamin O.