Understanding Tissue-Specific Gene Regulation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding Tissue-Specific Gene Regulation bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/110601; this version posted August 11, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Understanding Tissue-Specific Gene Regulation Abhijeet R. Sonawane1, John Platig2;3, Maud Fagny2;3, Cho-Yi Chen2;3, Joseph N. Paulson2;3, Camila M. Lopes-Ramos2;3, Dawn L. DeMeo1, John Quackenbush2;3;4, Kimberly Glass1;y;∗, Marieke L. Kuijjer2;3;y;∗ 1Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 2Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 3Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 4Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA Although all human tissues carry out common processes, tissues are distinguished by gene expres- sion patterns, implying that distinct regulatory programs control tissue-specificity. In this study, we investigate gene expression and regulation across 38 tissues profiled in the Genotype-Tissue Ex- pression project. We find that network edges (transcription factor to target gene connections) have higher tissue-specificity than network nodes (genes) and that regulating nodes (transcription fac- tors) are less likely to be expressed in a tissue-specific manner as compared to their targets (genes). Gene set enrichment analysis of network targeting also indicates that regulation of tissue-specific function is largely independent of transcription factor expression. In addition, tissue-specific genes are not highly targeted in their corresponding tissue-network. However, they do assume bottleneck positions due to variability in transcription factor targeting and the influence of non-canonical reg- ulatory interactions. These results suggest that tissue-specificity is driven by context-dependent regulatory paths, providing transcriptional control of tissue-specific processes. 1. INTRODUCTION some biological insight concerning the associations be- tween both tissue-specific and other genes [11, 12], they do not explicitly model key elements of the gene regula- Although all human cells carry out common processes tory process. that are essential for survival, in the physical context of their tissue-environment, they also exhibit unique func- PANDA (Passing Attributes between Networks for tions that help define their phenotype. These common Data Assimilation) is an integrative gene regulatory net- and tissue-specific processes are ultimately controlled by work inference method that models the complexity of gene regulatory networks that alter which genes are ex- the regulatory process, including interactions between pressed and control the extent of that expression. While transcription factors and their targets [13]. PANDA tissue-specificity is often described based on gene expres- uses a message passing approach to optimize an initial sion levels, we recognize that, by themselves, individual network between transcription factors and target genes genes, or even sets of genes, cannot adequately capture by integrating it with gene co-expression and protein- the variety of processes that distinguish different tissues. protein interaction information. In contrast to other net- Rather, biological function requires the combinatorial work approaches, PANDA does not directly incorporate involvement of multiple regulatory elements, primarily co-expression information between regulators and tar- transcription factors (TFs), that work together and with gets. Instead, edges in PANDA-predicted networks re- other genetic and environmental factors to mediate the flect the overall consistency between a transcription fac- transcription of genes and their protein products [1, 2]. tor's canonical regulatory profile and its target genes' co-expression patterns. A number of studies have shown Gene regulatory network modeling provides a mathe- that analyzing the structure of the regulatory networks matical framework that can summarize the complex in- estimated by PANDA can help elucidate the regulatory teractions between transcription factors, genes, and gene context of genes and transcription factors and provide products [3{6]. Despite the complexity of the regulatory insight in the associated biological processes [14{17]. process, the most widely used network modeling methods are based on pairwise gene co-expression information [7{ The transcriptomic data produced by the Genotype- 10]. While these correlation-based networks may provide Tissue Expression (GTEx) consortium [18] provide us with an unprecedented opportunity to investigate the complex regulatory patterns important for maintaining the diverse functional activity of genes across different ∗[email protected]; [email protected] tissues in the human body [19, 20]. These data include yEqual contribution high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) informa- bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/110601; this version posted August 11, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. 2 tion from 551 research subjects, sampled from 51 post- GTEx Expression data from 38 Tissues/Tissue-Sites mortem body sites and cell lines derived from two tissue types. In this study, we apply PANDA to infer gene regu- latory networks for thirty-eight different tissues by inte- grating GTEx RNA-Seq data with a canonical set of tran- (1) Integrate Regulatory scription factor to target gene edges (based on a motif Information (PANDA) scan of proximal promoter regions) and protein-protein 0.1 0.05 interactions. We then use these tissue-networks to iden- + + 0 tify tissue-specific regulatory interactions, to study the -0.05 -0.1 tissue-specific regulatory context of biological function, PPI Motif Co-expression and to understand how tissue-specificity manifests itself Regulatory Networks for 38 Tissues/Tissue-Sites within the global regulatory framework. By studying the ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● structure of these networks and comparing them between ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● tissues, we are able to gain several important insights into ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● tissue-specific gene regulation. Our overall approach is summarized in Figure 1. (2) Identify Tissue-Specific Network Elements 2. RESULTS 2.1. Identifying Tissue-Specific Network Edges Tissue-Specific Edges Tissue-Specific Nodes (TFs and Genes) We started by reconstructing genome-wide regulatory networks for each human tissue. We downloaded GTEx (3) Characterize Tissue-Specific Regulation of Biological Processes RNA-Seq data from dbGaP (phs000424.v6.p1, 2015-10- 05 release). The RNA-Seq data were preprocessed and then normalized in a sparse-aware manner [21] so as to retain genes that are expressed in only a single or small number of tissues. After filtering and quality control, GO Terms GO our RNA-Seq data included expression information for 4) Investigate the 30; 243 genes measured across 9; 435 samples and 38 dis- Regulatory Context TF Targeting Profiles across tinct tissues (Supplemental Materials and Methods). For 38 Tissues/Tissue-Sites of Tissue-Specificity each tissue, we used PANDA to integrate gene-gene co- expression information from this data set with an ini- tial regulatory network based on a genome-wide motif Figure 1: Schematic overview of our approach to character- scan of 644 transcription factors [22] and pairwise tran- ize tissue-specific gene regulation using the GTEx expression data. We started with gene expression for 9; 435 samples scription factor protein-protein interactions (PPI) from across 38 tissues; the relative sample size of each of the 38 StringDb v10 [23] (Figure 1 and Supplemental Mate- tissues in the GTEx expression data is
Recommended publications
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • POU Domain Family Values: Flexibility, Partnerships, and Developmental Codes
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW POU domain family values: flexibility, partnerships, and developmental codes Aimee K. Ryan and Michael G. Rosenfeld 1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department and School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, Califiornia 92093-0648 USA Transcription factors serve critical roles in the progres- primary focus of this review. Crystallization of the Oct-1 sive development of general body plan, organ commit- and Pit-1 POU domains on DNA and in vitro studies ment, and finally, specific cell types. It has been the hope examining the specificity of POU domain cofactor inter- of most developmental biologists that comparison of the actions suggest that the flexibility with which the POU biological roles of a series of individual members within domain recognizes DNA-binding sites is a critical com- a family will permit at least some predictive generaliza- ponent of its ability to regulate gene expression. The tions regarding the developmental events that are likely implications of these data with respect to the mecha- to be regulated by a particular class of transcription fac- nisms utilized by the POU domain family of transcrip- tors. Here, we present an overview of the developmental tion factors to control developmental events will also be functions of the family of transcription factors charac- discussed. terized by the POU DNA-binding motif afforded by re- cent in vivo studies. Conformation of the POU domain on DNA The POU domain family of transcription factors was defined following the observation that the products of High-affinity site-specific DNA binding by POU domain three mammalian genes, Pit-l, Oct-l, and Oct-2 and the transcription factors requires both the POU-specific do- protein encoded by the Caenorhabditis elegans gene main and the POU homeodomain (Sturm and Herr 1988; unc-86 shared a region of homology, known as the POU Ingraham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • ATAC-Seq Footprinting Unravels Kinetics of Transcription
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/869560; this version posted February 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Beyond accessibility: ATAC-seq footprinting unravels kinetics 2 of transcription factor binding during zygotic genome 3 activation 4 Authors 5 Mette Bentsen1, Philipp Goymann1, Hendrik Schultheis1, Kathrin Klee1, Anastasiia Petrova1, 6 René Wiegandt1, Annika Fust1, Jens Preussner1,3, Carsten Kuenne1, Thomas Braun2,3, 7 Johnny Kim2,3, Mario Looso1,3 8 Affiliation 9 1 Bioinformatics Core Unit (BCU), Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad 10 Nauheim, Germany 11 2 Department of Cardiac Development and Remodeling, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and 12 Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany 13 3 German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Rhein-Main, Frankfurt am 14 Main, 60596 Germany 15 Corresponding author email address 16 [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/869560; this version posted February 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 17 Abstract 18 While footprinting analysis of ATAC-seq data can theoretically enable investigation of 19 transcription factor (TF) binding, the lack of a computational tool able to conduct different 20 levels of footprinting analysis has so-far hindered the widespread application of this method. 21 Here we present TOBIAS, a comprehensive, accurate, and fast footprinting framework 22 enabling genome-wide investigation of TF binding dynamics for hundreds of TFs 23 simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Abnormal Mesenchymal Differentiation in the Superior Semicircular Canal of Brn4/Pou3f4 Knockout Mice
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE 2 Abnormal Mesenchymal Differentiation in the Superior Semicircular Canal of Brn4/Pou3f4 Knockout Mice Steven E. Sobol, MD, MSc; Xiuyin Teng, MSc; E. Bryan Crenshaw III, PhD Objective: To examine the developmental time course of the SSCC in Brn4 knockout mice was initially detect- of the mutant phenotype and cellular mechanisms that able at P14. Interestingly, the mutant SSCC is indistin- result in malformations of the superior semicircular ca- guishable from control mice at earlier neonatal time points. nal (SSCC) in Brn4 knockout mice. Mutations in the Brn4/ In mutant neonates, there is persistence of immature wo- Pou3f4 gene result in characteristic inner ear abnormali- ven bone with high cellularity surrounding the perilym- ties in mutant mouse pedigrees, and the findings in these phatic space of the SSCC. These findings are not pres- mice are similar to those in human X-linked deafness type ent in control animal specimens, which demonstrate III. appropriate lamellar bony architecture. Design: Mutant and control mice were killed at vari- Conclusions: In Brn4 knockout mice, constriction of the ous neonatal time points to assess the development of SSCC with narrowing of the bony labyrinth develops in the SSCC. Measurements of SSCC diameter were made the postnatal period at approximately P14. The persis- on paint-perfused specimens at postnatal day (P) 0, P7, tence of immature bone in affected mice indicates that P10, and P14. Histologic evaluation of the SSCC was signaling abnormalities disrupt normal mesenchymal dif- made on hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections at P10. ferentiation in the SSCC. Results: A dysmorphic constriction of the superior arc Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Agent and Antibodies B-Raf Inhibitor RAF265
    Supplemental Materials and Methods: Chemical agent and antibodies B-Raf inhibitor RAF265 [5-(2-(5-(trifluromethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)pyridin-4-yloxy)-N-(4-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-1-methyl-1H-benzp{D, }imidazol-2- amine] was kindly provided by Novartis Pharma AG and dissolved in solvent ethanol:propylene glycol:2.5% tween-80 (percentage 6:23:71) for oral delivery to mice by gavage. Antibodies to phospho-ERK1/2 Thr202/Tyr204(4370), phosphoMEK1/2(2338 and 9121)), phospho-cyclin D1(3300), cyclin D1 (2978), PLK1 (4513) BIM (2933), BAX (2772), BCL2 (2876) were from Cell Signaling Technology. Additional antibodies for phospho-ERK1,2 detection for western blot were from Promega (V803A), and Santa Cruz (E-Y, SC7383). Total ERK antibody for western blot analysis was K-23 from Santa Cruz (SC-94). Ki67 antibody (ab833) was from ABCAM, Mcl1 antibody (559027) was from BD Biosciences, Factor VIII antibody was from Dako (A082), CD31 antibody was from Dianova, (DIA310), and Cot antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-373677). For the cyclin D1 second antibody staining was with an Alexa Fluor 568 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, A10042) (1:200 dilution). The pMEK1 fluorescence was developed using the Alexa Fluor 488 chicken anti-rabbit IgG second antibody (1:200 dilution).TUNEL staining kits were from Promega (G2350). Mouse Implant Studies: Biopsy tissues were delivered to research laboratory in ice-cold Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) buffer solution. As the tissue mass available from each biopsy was limited, we first passaged the biopsy tissue in Balb/c nu/Foxn1 athymic nude mice (6-8 weeks of age and weighing 22-25g, purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley, USA) to increase the volume of tumor for further implantation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Principles Underlying Neural Lineage Conversion
    F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):1548 Last updated: 16 SEP 2019 REVIEW Evolving principles underlying neural lineage conversion and their relevance for biomedical translation [version 1; peer review: 4 approved] Lea Jessica Flitsch, Oliver Brüstle Institute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, University of Bonn School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine Wesphalia, 53127, Germany First published: 30 Aug 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):1548 ( Open Peer Review v1 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18926.1) Latest published: 30 Aug 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):1548 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18926.1) Reviewer Status Abstract Invited Reviewers Scientific and technological advances of the past decade have shed light 1 2 3 4 on the mechanisms underlying cell fate acquisition, including its transcriptional and epigenetic regulation during embryonic development. version 1 This knowledge has enabled us to purposefully engineer cell fates in vitro published by manipulating expression levels of lineage-instructing transcription 30 Aug 2019 factors. Here, we review the state of the art in the cell programming field with a focus on the derivation of neural cells. We reflect on what we know about the mechanisms underlying fate changes in general and on the F1000 Faculty Reviews are written by members of degree of epigenetic remodeling conveyed by the distinct reprogramming the prestigious F1000 Faculty. They are and direct conversion strategies available. Moreover, we discuss the commissioned and are peer reviewed before implications of residual epigenetic memory for biomedical applications such publication to ensure that the final, published version as disease modeling and neuroregeneration. Finally, we cover recent developments approaching cell fate conversion in the living brain and is comprehensive and accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryonic Origins of Virus-Induced Hearing Loss: Overview of Molecular Etiology
    viruses Review Embryonic Origins of Virus-Induced Hearing Loss: Overview of Molecular Etiology Maryam Karimi-Boroujeni 1,†, Ali Zahedi-Amiri 2,3,† and Kevin M. Coombs 2,3,4,* 1 School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada; [email protected] 2 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada; [email protected] 3 Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P4, Canada 4 Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P4, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors have contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Hearing loss, one of the most prevalent chronic health conditions, affects around half a billion people worldwide, including 34 million children. The World Health Organization estimates that the prevalence of disabling hearing loss will increase to over 900 million people by 2050. Many cases of congenital hearing loss are triggered by viral infections during different stages of pregnancy. However, the molecular mechanisms by which viruses induce hearing loss are not sufficiently explored, especially cases that are of embryonic origins. The present review first describes the cellular and molecular characteristics of the auditory system development at early stages of embryogenesis. These developmental hallmarks, which initiate upon axial specification of the otic placode as the primary root of the inner ear morphogenesis, involve the stage-specific regulation of several molecules and pathways, such as retinoic acid signaling, Sonic hedgehog, and Wnt. Different RNA and DNA viruses contributing to congenital and acquired hearing loss are then discussed in terms of their potential effects on the expression of molecules that control the formation of the auditory and Citation: Karimi-Boroujeni, M.; vestibular compartments following otic vesicle differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of the PROX1 Gene from Upstream Conserved Elements in a Complex Inversion/ Translocation Patient with Hypoplastic Left Heart
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2009) 17, 1423 – 1431 & 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Separation of the PROX1 gene from upstream conserved elements in a complex inversion/ translocation patient with hypoplastic left heart Harinder K Gill1,2, Sian R Parsons3, Cosma Spalluto3, Angela F Davies4, Victoria J Knorz3, Clare EG Burlinson1, Bee Ling Ng5, Nigel P Carter5, Caroline Mackie Ogilvie1,4, David I Wilson3 and Roland G Roberts*,1 1Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King’s College London, London, UK; 2Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 3Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Human Genetics Division, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; 4Department of Cytogenetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 5Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK Hypoplastic left heart (HLH) occurs in at least 1 in 10 000 live births but may be more common in utero. Its causes are poorly understood but a number of affected cases are associated with chromosomal abnormalities. We set out to localize the breakpoints in a patient with sporadic HLH and a de novo translocation. Initial studies showed that the apparently simple 1q41;3q27.1 translocation was actually combined with a 4-Mb inversion, also de novo, of material within 1q41. We therefore localized all four breakpoints and found that no known transcription units were disrupted. However we present a case, based on functional considerations, synteny and position of highly conserved non-coding sequence elements, and the heterozygous Prox1 þ /À mouse phenotype (ventricular hypoplasia), for the involvement of dysregulation of the PROX1 gene in the aetiology of HLH in this case.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Novel Candidate Genes and Variants for Hearing
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Identification of Novel Candidate Genes and Variants for Hearing Loss and Temporal Bone Anomalies Regie Lyn P. Santos-Cortez 1,2,3,*, Talitha Karisse L. Yarza 3,4, Tori C. Bootpetch 1, Ma. Leah C. Tantoco 3,4,5, Karen L. Mohlke 6, Teresa Luisa G. Cruz 3,5, Mary Ellen Chiong Perez 7, Abner L. Chan 3,5, Nanette R. Lee 8, Celina Ann M. Tobias-Grasso 9, Maria Rina T. Reyes-Quintos 3,4,5, Eva Maria Cutiongco-de la Paz 10,11 and Charlotte M. Chiong 3,4,5,12,* 1 Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; [email protected] 2 Center for Children’s Surgery, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA 3 Philippine National Ear Institute, University of the Philippines (UP) Manila–National Institutes of Health (NIH), Manila 1000, Philippines; [email protected] (T.K.L.Y.); [email protected] (M.L.C.T.); [email protected] (T.L.G.C.); [email protected] (A.L.C.); [email protected] (M.R.T.R.-Q.) 4 Newborn Hearing Screening Reference Center, UP Manila—NIH, Manila 1000, Philippines 5 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, UP Manila College of Medicine—Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH), Manila 1000, Philippines 6 Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; [email protected] 7 Department of Anesthesiology, UP Manila College of Medicine, Manila 1000, Philippines; [email protected] Citation: Santos-Cortez, R.L.P.; 8 Office of Population Studies and Department
    [Show full text]
  • BMC Biology Biomed Central
    BMC Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Classification and nomenclature of all human homeobox genes PeterWHHolland*†1, H Anne F Booth†1 and Elspeth A Bruford2 Address: 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK and 2HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK Email: Peter WH Holland* - [email protected]; H Anne F Booth - [email protected]; Elspeth A Bruford - [email protected] * Corresponding author †Equal contributors Published: 26 October 2007 Received: 30 March 2007 Accepted: 26 October 2007 BMC Biology 2007, 5:47 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-47 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/5/47 © 2007 Holland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The homeobox genes are a large and diverse group of genes, many of which play important roles in the embryonic development of animals. Increasingly, homeobox genes are being compared between genomes in an attempt to understand the evolution of animal development. Despite their importance, the full diversity of human homeobox genes has not previously been described. Results: We have identified all homeobox genes and pseudogenes in the euchromatic regions of the human genome, finding many unannotated, incorrectly annotated, unnamed, misnamed or misclassified genes and pseudogenes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Chromatome As a Driver of Disease: a Panoramic View from Different Methodologies
    The changing chromatome as a driver of disease: A panoramic view from different methodologies Isabel Espejo1, Luciano Di Croce,1,2,3 and Sergi Aranda1 1. Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain 2. Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain 3. ICREA, Pg. Lluis Companys 23, Barcelona 08010, Spain *Corresponding authors: Luciano Di Croce ([email protected]) Sergi Aranda ([email protected]) 1 GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT Chromatin-bound proteins regulate gene expression, replicate and repair DNA, and transmit epigenetic information. Several human diseases are highly influenced by alterations in the chromatin- bound proteome. Thus, biochemical approaches for the systematic characterization of the chromatome could contribute to identifying new regulators of cellular functionality, including those that are relevant to human disorders. 2 SUMMARY Chromatin-bound proteins underlie several fundamental cellular functions, such as control of gene expression and the faithful transmission of genetic and epigenetic information. Components of the chromatin proteome (the “chromatome”) are essential in human life, and mutations in chromatin-bound proteins are frequently drivers of human diseases, such as cancer. Proteomic characterization of chromatin and de novo identification of chromatin interactors could thus reveal important and perhaps unexpected players implicated in human physiology and disease. Recently, intensive research efforts have focused on developing strategies to characterize the chromatome composition. In this review, we provide an overview of the dynamic composition of the chromatome, highlight the importance of its alterations as a driving force in human disease (and particularly in cancer), and discuss the different approaches to systematically characterize the chromatin-bound proteome in a global manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical and Molecular Characterization of POU3F4
    Su et al. BMC Medical Genetics (2018) 19:157 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-018-0630-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Clinical and molecular characterization of POU3F4 mutations in multiple DFNX2 Chinese families Yu Su1,2†, Xue Gao1,4†, Sha-Sha Huang1†, Jing-Ning Mao3, Bang-Qing Huang2, Jian-Dong Zhao1, Dong-Yang Kang1, Xin Zhang1 and Pu Dai1* Abstract Background: Many X-linked non-syndromic hearing loss (HL) cases are caused by various mutations in the POU domain class 3 transcription factor 4 (POU3F4) gene. This study aimed to identify allelic variants of this gene in two Chinese families displaying X-linked inheritance deafness-2 (DFNX2) and one sporadic case with indefinite inheritance pattern. Methods: Direct DNA sequencing of the POU3F4 gene was performed in these families and in 100 Chinese individuals with normal hearing. Results: There are characteristic imaging findings in DFNX2 Chinese families with POU3F4 mutations. The temporal bone computed tomography (CT) images of patients with DFNX2 are characterized by a thickened stapes footplate, hypoplasia of the cochlear base, absence of the bony modiolus, and dilated internal acoustic meatus (IAM) as well as by abnormally wide communication between the IAM and the basal turn of the cochlea. We identified three causative mutations in POU3F4 for three probands and their extended families. In family 1468, we observed a novel deletion mutation, c.973delT, which is predicted to result in a p.Trp325Gly amino acid frameshift. In family 2741, the mutation c. 927delCTC was identified, which is predicted to result in the deletion of serine at position 310.
    [Show full text]