DOCSLIB.ORG

ANI/WG/2017/1/06 Annex DOC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANI/WG/2017/1/06 Annex DOC EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate E: Sectoral and regional statistics Unit E-1: Agriculture and fisheries Luxembourg, 3 January 2017 ESTAT/E.1 CW/PM DOC. ANI/WG/2017/1/06 Annex DOC. ANI/REF/2017/M/MILK/1 Meeting of the Working Group on Animal Production Statistics 28 February-1 March 2017 ANNEX HANDBOOK ON STATISTICS OF MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS ITEM 6 ON THE AGENDA LIMITED Document available on Circabc: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/70efa81c-dae2-4bfa-bd2b-e816934055f5 Table of contents 0. VERSIONNING OF THE DOCUMENT ................................................................... 5 0.1. Acknowlegments ............................................................................................... 5 0.2. Versioning of the document .............................................................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................ 6 1.2. Structure of the handbook ................................................................................. 6 1.3. Purpose of statistics on milk and milk products ................................................ 7 1.4. Legal basis ......................................................................................................... 9 1.5. Implementation: minimum and extended requirements .................................. 10 1.6. The set of statistical tables ............................................................................... 10 1.7. Main material flows of milk and milk products .............................................. 11 2. STATISTICS ON AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (TABLE C AND I) ................ 13 2.1. Survey on statistics on milk and milk products on agricultural holdings ........ 13 2.2. Contrasted relevance amongst EU areas ......................................................... 14 2.3. Adapted survey ................................................................................................ 15 2.4. Filling in Table C ............................................................................................. 15 2.5. Filling in Table I .............................................................................................. 15 3. THE STATISTICS ON DAIRY ENTERPRISES (TABLES A, B, D TO G AND H) ..................................................................................................................... 15 3.1. Definition of the dairy enterprises ................................................................... 15 3.2. Main concepts used for the statistics on dairy enterprises .............................. 16 3.2.1. Used milk ........................................................................................... 16 3.2.2. Measurement of used materials or of fat and proteins....................... 17 3.2.3. Measured phenomena ........................................................................ 18 3.2.4. Reporting for the national dairy......................................................... 21 3.2.5. The national dairy – internal flows .................................................... 22 3.3. Cows’ milk collection by the national dairy: Table A and Table B ................ 24 3.3.1. Legal requirements ............................................................................ 24 3.3.2. Limits in usability .............................................................................. 25 3.4. The balance sheet for the national dairy: Tables B and H ............................... 26 3.5. Availabilities .................................................................................................... 26 3.6. Utilisations of milk by the national dairy ........................................................ 27 3.6.1. Description ........................................................................................ 27 3.6.2. Statistical differences and losses ....................................................... 27 3.7. Coherence of Table B with other statistics ...................................................... 28 3.8. Filling in Table A ............................................................................................ 29 3.9. Filling in Table B and H .................................................................................. 29 3.10. The statistics on structure of dairy enterprises (tables D to G) ....................... 30 ANNEX I INVENTORY OF WORKING DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT ................................................................................... 31 ANNEX II POLICY NEEDS ............................................................................... 35 1. NEEDS SERVED BY THE EU STATISTICS ON MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS .............................................................................................................. 35 2. LIST AND DEFINITION OF MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS ............................. 37 2 2.1. Products and definitions .................................................................................. 37 3. QUALITY OF THE COLLECTED DATA .............................................................. 38 3.1. Coverage .......................................................................................................... 38 3.2. Transmission deadlines ................................................................................... 39 3.3. Categories, Precision, Regional statistics ........................................................ 39 3.4. Completeness ................................................................................................... 39 3.5. Clarity .............................................................................................................. 39 4. ELEMENTS COLLECTED ...................................................................................... 40 4.1. Monthly statistics (Table A) ............................................................................ 40 4.2. Annual statistics on activity of dairies (Tables B and H) ................................ 41 4.3. Triennial statistics on the structure of dairy enterprises (Tables D to G5) ................................................................................................................... 41 4.4. Annual statistics on dairy agricultural holdings (Table C) .............................. 41 5. FREQUENCY AND TIMELINESS ......................................................................... 41 5.1. Frequency ........................................................................................................ 41 5.2. Timeliness ........................................................................................................ 42 6. CONFIDENTIALITY ............................................................................................... 42 6.1. Confidentiality charter ..................................................................................... 42 7. DATA CHECKS // ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS .......................................... 43 7.1. Data validation ................................................................................................. 43 7.2. Data checks for consistency ............................................................................ 43 ANNEX III GLOSSARY ...................................................................................... 44 ANNEX IV LEGAL REFERENCES .................................................................... 45 1. EU LEGISLATION .................................................................................................. 45 2. NATIONAL LEGISLATION IMPLEMENTING DIRECTIVE 96/16/EC ............. 45 ANNEX V COHERENCE OF THE STATISTICAL TABLES .......................... 46 1. DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 46 2. PARTICULAR STATISTICAL LINKS ................................................................... 47 2.1. Within the tables .............................................................................................. 47 2.2. Between the tables ........................................................................................... 48 2.3. With other statistics ......................................................................................... 48 2.4. Analyse of the content ..................................................................................... 49 2.5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 51 ANNEX VI DEFINITION OF THE STATISTICAL UNITS (DAIRY ENTERPRISES) AND OF DAIRY MATERIALS .................................................. 52 1. DEFINITION OF THE DAIRY ENTERPRISES ..................................................... 52 1.1. Legal definition ............................................................................................... 52 1.2. Direct interpretation ......................................................................................... 52 1.3. Revised interpretation ...................................................................................... 53 1.4. Extended interpretation ................................................................................... 53 1.5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 54 2. DAIRY MATERIALS .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Trade Representative + + + + + 301
    1 UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE + + + + + 301 COMMITTEE + + + + + SECTION 301 TARIFFS PUBLIC HEARING + + + + + MONDAY AUGUST 5, 2019 + + + + + The 301 Committee met in the Main Hearing Room of the U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Washington, D.C., at 9:30 a.m., Arthur Tsao, Chair, presiding. PRESENT ARTHUR TSAO, Chair, U.S. Trade Representative BARBARA BANAS, U.S. Department of Agriculture SARAH BONNER, Small Business Administration WON CHANG, Department of Treasury TERESA HOWES, U.S. Trade Representative JESSICA HUANG, Department of Commerce AGATHA KOPROWSKI, Department of Treasury TRACY ROY, Customs and Border Patrol ARI SULBY, Department of State DAVID WEINER, U.S. Trade Representative ALSO PRESENT WILLIAM BISHOP, U.S. International Trade Commission TYRELL BURCH, U.S. International Trade Commission NEAL R. GROSS COURT REPORTERS AND TRANSCRIBERS 1323 RHODE ISLAND AVE., N.W. (202) 234-4433 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3701 www.nealrgross.com 2 WITNESSES PRESENT PETER ALFORD, PNP Supply, LLC CHARLES BERNARD, Eagle Metals, Inc. MARK BOYCE, Kemper AIP Metals, LLC DENNIS BURRESON, OGCC Member DIMITAR DIMITROV, Sofia Med SA FRANZISKA ERDLE, WVMetalle BRENDAN FITZPATRICK, DuroTerra KYLE GILSTER, Gellert Global Group RICH HUDGINS, California Cling Peach Board and California Canning Peach Association ARLIE JACOBS, Hempler Foods Group MICHAEL JEMISON, Heyco Metal, Inc. PHIL KAFARAKIS, Specialty Food Association DANIEL KENDALL, ABC Metals DAVID KLOTZ, Precision Metalforming Association JAMES MILLER, Franconia Industries, Inc. JEFFREY NYSTROM, Aurubis Buffalo, Inc. BRIAN O'SHAUGHNESSY, Revere Copper JASON REDD, Consorzio Per La Tutela Del Formaggio Pecorino Romano MIKE RODGERS, The Miller Company NANCY ROSENTHAL, Rotax Metals, Inc. JOHN SHAY, KME America, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rt. 7A, Shaftsbury, VT • (802) 442-4273 I Delivery Available 9Am-3Pm Sunday-Manchester Clearbrookfarm.Com • (Across from the Chocolate Barn) Monday Through Friday
    ont Country Sam rm ple Ve r Free April 2012 • Statewide Calendar of Events, Map • Inns, B&B’s, Dining, Real Estate • Plenty of Good Reading! X-C SKIING • SNOWSHOEING • 1,300 ACRES FITNESS CENTER • SAUNA WHIRLPOOL • GOLF BIKING A great spot to gather. For all ages. To celebrate weddings, birthdays and family reunions. An Outstanding Place to Connect. ~ Only 3 miles from Exit 4 / I-89 ~ 802-728-5575 www.3stallioninn.com Lower Stock Farm Road • Randolph, Vermont The Sammis Family, Owners “Best Dining Experience in Central Vermont” WEDDINGS • REUNIONS RETREATS • CONFERENCES LIPPITT’S RESTAURANT • MORGAN’S PUB Children’s Book Illustrator Exhibits in Brattleboro, VT NYT Best Book Award Il- ous, other awards, recom- lustrator Barbara McClintock mended/best book lists, and will be exhibiting her illus- starred reviews. According trations at Brooks Memorial to Booklist reviewer Michael Library in Brattleboro, VT Cart, McClintock’s “beauti- through April. fully restrained use of color The library’s Fine Arts may evoke a long-ago time, Committee presents Mc- but her compositions are so Clintock’s work in the Chil- dynamic that there’s always dren’s Illustrator Bookcase something for contemporary on the 2nd Floor. The Book- children to discover.” case demonstrates the art- ist’s process in creating the The Brooks Memorial Li- illustrations that eventually brary is located at 224 Main become a book. St. in Brattleboro, VT. It is Barbara’s books have won open Mon–Wed 10–9; Thurs four New York Times Best 1–6; Fri 10–6; and Sat 10–2. Books awards, a New York For more information, call Times Notable Book citation, (802) 254-5290.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Effects of Policy Change on Households and Children's Milk
    University of Hohenheim Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics Rural Development Theory and Policy Assessing the effects of policy change on households and children’s milk consumption in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya Master thesis by Franziska Anna Schneider University of Hohenheim, February 2018 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree Master of Science Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics and Subtropics First supervisor: Prof. Dr. Manfred Zeller Second supervisor: Prof. Dr. Regina Birner Declaration I hereby declare that I, Franziska Anna Schneider, born on 12th of November 1991, matriculation number 638278, completed the Master’s thesis attached to this declaration independently and solely using the sources listed in the references and that it has not been submitted anywhere else. All passages of the thesis which were taken word-for- word or paraphrased from publications or other sources are marked appropriately. Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Manfred Zeller Second supervisor: Prof. Dr. Regina Birner Topic of Thesis: Assessing the effects of policy change on households and children’s milk consumption in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya Semester: 5 I declare, here within, that I have transferred the final digital text document (in the format doc, docx, odt, pdf, or rtf) to my mentoring supervisor and that the content and wording is entirely my own work. I am aware that the digital version of my document can and/or will be checked for plagiarism with the help of an analyses software program. City, Date, Signature ii ABSTRACT Although 86% of the Kenyan milk is supplied through informal markets, policy makers aim to decrease the milk sold through informal markets due to safety and quality concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calcium Challenge
    HEALTHY INGREDIENTS 45 The global market for bone health foods is now worth US$2.5Bn, and is expected to grow at over 4% per annum1. Here DR. GERHARD GERSTNER, technical service manager special salts for Jungbunzlauer Ladenburg GmbH, discusses important technological as well as economical aspects of calcium fortification in dairy products with a focus on micronised tricalcium citrate DAIRY PRODUCTS: the calcium challenge s everybody knows that dairy age of 50 are affected by an en- Calcium joins a range of products usually contain substantial hanced bone fragility and an increased fracture risk. ingredients that add value to Aamounts of calcium, they have been and During the conference, experts agreed to further in- dairy products still are an ideal food to be fortified with extra calcium crease efforts such as optimising diagnostics and treat- to meet nutritional needs by providing larger amounts ment and promoting adequate intake of calcium and in one single serving. vitamin D in the diet. However, the feasibility of calcium addition has to Looking at the ingredients list of dairy products, it be considered as technologically milk products repre- is evident that there is not a single source of calcium sent a complex food matrix. This challenge drives but rather a range of different possibilities which can mineral salt suppliers such as Jungbunzlauer to offer be used commercially: a range of different calcium salts to be able to tune ■ inorganic salts like calcium chloride, calcium car- them to food manufacturers’ applications: tricalcium bonate and calcium phosphate; citrate, calcium gluconate and the new product de- ■ milk minerals comprised mainly of calcium phos- velopment calcium lactate gluconate.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Plant Yangon, Myanmar
    OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box
    [Show full text]
  • Foods and Drinks in Fifteenth-Century Anatolia, As Recorded by Amirdovlat Amasiats‘I
    Journal o f the Society for Armenian Studies 14 (2005), pp. 155-166 Foods and Drinks in Fifteenth-Century Anatolia, as Recorded by Amirdovlat Amasiats‘i John L. Gueriguian INTRODUCTION The King of Moths has been kind to Amirdovlat Amasiats‘i, since it has pre­ served a number of his manuscripts, including the monumental description of pharmaceutical simples, humorously entitled Useless to the Ignorant.* The analy­ sis of this work yields a great number of information on what people ate and drank in fifteenth century Anatolia. This article will try to give a general idea of the edibles that were available to Anatolian populations at that time, without any pre­ tence of being exhaustive. In 1453 Mehmet II Fetih captures Constantinople. In 1487, Bartolomeo Diaz crosses the Horn of Tempests, later renamed Cape of Good Hope, inaugurating the Western era of exploration of the East, near and far. Ultimately, the West would displace the Near and Middle East from the trade routes they initially controlled. The life of Amirdovlat Amasiats'i straddles this crucial period of East-West rela­ tionships. AMIRDOVLAT’S BIOGRAPHY Amirdovlat,1 2 son of Eghia, was bom in Amasya around 1415-1420, in an Ar­ menian family of probably modest origin.3 Later, he remembered, in his work, his native city—its flowers,4 its edible plants,5 and even the fish in its rivers.6 1 This work, composed in Istanbul in 1478, has been translated and then published in the original Armenian by K.H. Basmajian, Angitats' anpet (Vienna: Mkit'arean Tparan, 1926) and translated into Russian by S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue
    ISSUE community newsletter PO BOX 147, GARFIELD, 3814 I INCORPORATION NO: A0053615E I ABN: 59 328 075 826 I ISSUE 109 DECEMBER 2019 FREE Garfield Spectator is proudly supported by GARFIELD SPECTATOR I www.garfieldspectator.com.au I ISSUE 109 DECEMBER 2019 1 Issue dueDEADLINE out 1st week IS THEof every 20 month.TH OF PleaseTHE MONTH (no edition for January 2020) send your contribution to - Issue due out 1st week every month TO SUBMIT ADVERTISEMENTS Submitting via email: TO SUBMIT ARTICLES Submitting via email: To: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject line: Advertiser, size of article and lay- Subject line: Editor, subject or name of out wanted (see below) name of business article with author's name (and photogra- pher's name) to be published Body of email: Your advertisement and any graphics attached (or flyer for full page) Body of email: Your article/photos attached Or write to: PO BOX 147. GARFIELD, 3814 Or write to: STANDARD ADVERTISING SIZES AND PRICING as PO BOX 147, GARFIELD, 3814 at 1st November 2017 Payment is required with copy by deadline for all advertisements, see table below for prices. Gar- field and District Not-For-Profit Community groups The Garfield Spectator is a community publica- and clubs are not charged for advertising. All ad- tion and as such the views, comments or details vertising in the printed copy will also appear on our published are not necessarily that of the com- website, www.garfieldspectator.com.au, in the mittee. Every effort is made to ensure what is downloaded versions of the current and previous printed is factual and correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Outlook BIANNUAL REPORT on GLOBAL FOOD MARKETS
    Food Outlook BIANNUAL REPORT ON GLOBAL FOOD MARKETS November 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Food Outlook report is a product of the FAO Trade and Markets Division. This report is prepared under the overall guidance of Boubaker Ben-Belhassen, Director, and Abdolreza Abbassian, Senior Economist. The report benefited from research support by many staff, namely, David Bedford, Julie Claro, Erica Doro, Lavinia Lucarelli, Emanuele Marocco, Marco Milo, Shirley Mustafa, Di Yang and the fisheries statistical team. Special thanks go to David Bedford and Lavinia Lucarelli for preparing the charts and statistical tables and to Valentina Banti for her administrative support. Additionally, the team is grateful to Ettore Vecchione for the desktop publishing and to Claire Pedrick for her valuable editorial assistance. Required citation: FAO. 2018 Food Outlook - Biannual Report on Global Food Markets – November 2018. Rome. 104 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Milk Quota Expiry Impacts and Sensitivity Analyses Using The
    Agrarwirtschaft 58 (2009), Heft 5/6 Milk quota expiry impacts and sensitivity analyses using the CAPSIM model Auswirkungen der Milchquotenabschaffung und Sensitivitätsanalysen mit dem CAPSIM Modell Heinz Peter Witzke* University of Bonn, Germany Axel Tonini* European Commission, Seville, Spain Abstract* Schlüsselwörter Various scenarios for an expiry of European Union milk quotas are 'Gesundheitscheck'; Milchquoten; Quotenrente; Preistransmission; analysed with the Common Agricultural Policy SIMulation (CAPSIM) Exportsubventionen model. This comparative-static, partial equilibrium modelling tool covering the whole of agriculture for all EU member states has been disaggregated to represent nine secondary dairy products. Impacts 1. Introduction are compared to a reference run where the 2003 Common Agricul- The aim of this study is to provide a multi commodity anal- tural Policy Reform is projected into the future. The main milk quota ysis on European Union milk market reform options in the expiry scenario is for 2020. Key results are that milk production would increase by 3.0% in EU-27 whereas milk prices would drop by context of the ongoing Common Agricultural Policy 'Health 7.2%. The resulting decline in butter prices is shown to be larger if Check' (HC). The analysis is carried with the Common EU authorities cannot rely on export subsidies for market manage- Agricultural Policy SIMulation (CAPSIM) model (WITZKE ment. The regional pattern of impacts is strongly determined by the et al., 2008). In a reference run or 'baseline scenario' the specification of quota rents. Furthermore, details of intra EU price 2003 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Reform is pro- transmission are shown to influence the differences between Mem- jected into the future (2014 and 2020) giving a yardstick for ber States.
    [Show full text]
  • What Information Do Consumers Consider, and How Do They Look for It, When Shopping for Groceries Online? ☆ Yael Benn A,*, Thomas L
    Appetite 89 (2015) 265–273 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Appetite journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/appet Research report What information do consumers consider, and how do they look for it, when shopping for groceries online? ☆ Yael Benn a,*, Thomas L. Webb a, Betty P.I. Chang a, John Reidy b a University of Sheffield, UK b Sheffield Hallam University, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Previous research investigating what information shoppers seek when purchasing groceries has used either Received 12 August 2014 lab-experiments or observed shoppers in supermarkets. The present research investigates this question Received in revised form 1 December 2014 in a relatively naturalistic online-grocery environment. Forty participants completed their weekly shop- Accepted 29 January 2015 ping online while their eye-movements were recorded. Ten of the participants were subsequently Available online 4 February 2015 interviewed to gain insight into their information seeking behaviour. We found that, when looking for products, 95% of participants navigated through the ‘virtual departments’, 80% used the ‘search’ facility, Keywords: and 68% browsed the special offer pages. Once on the product pages, participants tended to look at the Front-of package labelling Online grocery shopping pictures of products, rather than examine detailed product information. To explain these findings, we Label viewing suggest that online grocery sites simulate familiar supermarket environments, which may explain why Pre-purchase information seeking consumers prefer to browse categories of products rather than use search terms. We also suggest that behaviour additional strategies are needed if consumers are to be encouraged to view detailed product information.
    [Show full text]
  • Garfield Joins the Swiss Valley Team!!
    April 2006 Garfi eld joins the Swiss Valley Team!! SWISS VALLEY FARMS ELECTS NEW BOARD PRESIDENT t its yearly reorganization While Don was still in high school meeting in mid-February, the in 1958, he took over the 40-cow ASwiss Valley Farms Board of farm operation in Cashton, Wis., Directors elected Donald Peterson of from his father. On Coulee Crest Published Monthly by: Cashton, Wis. as its new president. Farm, Don and his wife Dorothy Swiss Valley Farms, Co. In this position, Don will follow and their son Kurt have developed P.O. Box 4493 long-time Board President Gerald an impressive herd of 170 Guernseys Davenport IA 52808 Bratland, who retired this year. that have included three consecutive James Schmitt, Sherrill, Iowa, was generations of #1 index cows in the 563.468.6600 FAX 563.468.6613 elected Board treasurer, replacing breed in the past fi ve years. www.swissvalley.com Peterson in this position. Don is a past American Randy Schaefer, Blue Grass, Guernsey Association (AGA) Board Nancy Feeney Iowa, was re-elected vice president. of Director and Finance Chairman. Editor/ Member Relations Mgr. Pam Bolin, Clarksville, Iowa was Don fi rst joined the Swiss Valley Karen Bohnert Member Relations Assistant re-elected secretary. James Oelfke, Farms Board as a Wisconsin-at-large Hamburg, Minn., was elected director in 1999. He was elected the director for District 16 in 2004. “Swiss Valley Farms Co., a farmer-owned cooperative, believes in market security by producing and marketing the highest quality products and services to customers, members and employees.” Swiss Valley Board Offi cers President Donald Peterson....................................Cashton, WI Vice President Co-CEO’s Boelens & Toyne present Newly appointed Board President Don Randy Schaefer....................................Blue Grass, IA Bratland with a good-bye gift.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1. the List of Dairy Products and High-Tryptophan Concentration Foods That Were Restricted During the Study
    Supplementary Table 1. The list of dairy products and high-tryptophan concentration foods that were restricted during the study. Category List of foods Do not eat: Dairy products Milk, Yogurt, Cheese Pork Tripe/Chitterlings Grilled tripe, Tripe hotpot Beans and related products Soybean, Tofu, Soy milk, Soy protein powder Others Chi-seed, Spirulina Limited (≤100g/day): Eggs 2 eggs, 10 quail eggs Poultry 1 chicken breast, 1 chicken leg, 10 smoked duck slices Meat Half portion of pork, 2 piece of tenderloin of lamb/veal Processed meat Half of spam, 10 small Vienna Sausages, 10 strips of bacon Nuts 1 cup of peanut, pumpkin seed, sunflower seed, sesame Fish 10 slices of smoked salmon, 1 piece of cod, 3/4 can of sea snail Supplementary Table 2. Differences of change in sleep parameters measured by polysomnography (PSG) between control (Placebo) and test (Alpha-s1 casein hydrolysate (ACH)) phases. Placebo ACH P-value* Variables Group* Week 0 Week 4 Week 0 Week 4 Group Time Time Time-in-bed (min) 393.4 ± 4.1 396.1 ± 5.3 393.0 ± 2.7 394.1 ± 4.4 0.718 0.613 0.841 Total sleep time (min) 326.5 ± 8.9 332.1 ± 8.1 330.6 ± 8.9 341.5 ± 9.0 0.352 0.286 0.729 Sleep latency (min) 8.7 ± 1.7 8.1 ± 1.4 10.7 ± 2.5 6.5 ± 0.9 0.808 0.620 0.437 Sleep efficiency (%) 83.0 ± 2.1 83.8 ± 1.7 84.0 ± 2.1 86.6 ± 1.9 0.183 0.324 0.599 WASO (min) 58.2 ± 8.1 55.9 ± 5.9 51.8 ± 7.6 46.1 ± 7.3 0.040 0.567 0.551 WASO (%) 15.1 ± 2.1 14.5 ± 1.6 13.6 ± 2.1 12.0 ± 1.9 0.055 0.530 0.545 Total arousal (N) 78.7 ± 6.4 80.9 ± 6.6 73.6 ± 6.4 77.9 ± 7.2 0.352 0.453 0.812 Arousal index (/hr)
    [Show full text]