DOCSLIB.ORG

Education and Sports Sector Development Plan 2021-2025

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Education and Sports Sector Development Plan 2021-2025 LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRACY UNITY PROSPERITY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SPORTS EDUCATION AND SPORTS SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2021-2025 Vientiane, October 2020 Lao People’s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Ministry of Education and Sports EDUCATION AND SPORTS SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2021-2025 Vientiane, October 2020 Table of content Preamble ................................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. iv List of Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... v PART I : EDUCATION AND SPORTS SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2021-2025 ....................................... 1 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Lessons learned from ESDP 2016-20 ....................................................................................... 1 1.2. Approach for the development of ESSDP 2021-25 ................................................................. 3 2. Main achievements during 2016-20 ................................................................................................ 3 3. Context for ESSDP 2021-25 ............................................................................................................. 8 3.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 8 3.2. Impact of COVID-19 ............................................................................................................... 11 3.3. Priority Policy Objectives for ESSDP 2021-25 ........................................................................ 12 3.4. Risks for ESSDP 2021-25 ........................................................................................................ 13 4. Overall Goal 2021-25 ..................................................................................................................... 13 5. Overarching Outcome 2021-25 ..................................................................................................... 14 6. Expected High Level Outcomes ..................................................................................................... 14 Important caveat regarding achieving the eight high-level outcomes ............................................. 14 6.1. High-Level Outcome 1: .......................................................................................................... 14 6.2. High-Level Outcome 2: .......................................................................................................... 19 6.3. High-Level Outcome 3: .......................................................................................................... 22 6.4. High-Level Outcome 4: .......................................................................................................... 26 6.5. High-Level Outcome 5: .......................................................................................................... 27 6.6. High-Level Outcome 6: .......................................................................................................... 31 6.7. High-Level Outcome 7: .......................................................................................................... 35 6.8. High-Level Outcome 8: .......................................................................................................... 37 7. Resources and Financial Requirements for ESSDP 2021-25 .......................................................... 38 8. Implementation M&E Framework for ESSDP 2021-25 .................................................................. 49 PART II: SUB-SECTOR PLAN 2021-2025 ................................................................................................. 69 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 69 I. EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION SUB-SECTOR PLAN ..................................................................... 70 II. PRIMARY EDUCATION SUB-SECTOR PLAN ..................................................................................... 77 III. LOWER SECONDARY EDUCATION SUB-SECTOR PLAN ................................................................... 86 IV. UPPER SECONDARY EDUCATION SUB-SECTOR PLAN .................................................................... 94 V. NON-FORMAL EDUCATION SUB-SECTOR PLAN ........................................................................... 100 VI. TEACHER EDUCATION SUB-SECTOR PLAN ................................................................................... 107 VII. TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING....................................................... 115 VIII. HIGHER EDUCATION SUB SECTOR PLAN ..................................................................................... 120 IX. SPORT-PHYSICAL EXERCISE SUB-SECTOR PLAN ........................................................................... 128 X. ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT SUB-SECTOR PLAN ....................................................... 136 i Table of content, Figure and annex Table 1: The Share of Education Budget during 2016-2020 ................................................................. 38 Table 2: The Education Budget Vs ESDP Financing Requirement ......................................................... 39 Table 3: The Share of Education Budget by Chapters ........................................................................... 41 Table 4: Priority Expenditure Programmes ........................................................................................... 42 Table 5: The key parameters for the two scenarios .............................................................................. 45 Table 6: Costs of the Steady-State scenario .......................................................................................... 46 Table 7: Costs of the Education Quality scenario .................................................................................. 46 Table 8: Financing Plan under Steady State scenario ........................................................................... 48 Table 9: Financing Plan under Education Quality scenario ................................................................... 48 Figure 1: ESSDP 2021-2025 and annual planning and performance monitoring and evaluation cycle 52 Table 10: ESSDP Indicators (Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a MTFF is not available from MoF and therefore there is uncertainty about the education budget, thus targets are indicative only, and will be updated after the MTFF becomes available) ................................................................................... 54 Table 11: Comparison of indicators of ECE from 2016-2020 ................................................................ 70 Table 12: Comparison of indicators of primary education from 2016-2020 ........................................ 77 Table 13: Comparison of internal efficiency for primary education ..................................................... 77 Table 14: Comparison of indicators of lower secondary education from 2016-2020 .......................... 86 Table 15: Comparison of internal efficiency for lower secondary education ....................................... 86 Table 16: Comparison of indicators of upper secondary education from 2016-2020 .......................... 94 Table 17: Comparison of internal efficiency for upper secondary education ....................................... 94 Table 18: Comparison of indicators of non-formal education from 2016-2020 ................................. 100 Table 19: Comparison of indicators of teacher education from 2016-2020 ....................................... 107 Table 20: Graduates from Teacher Education Institutions from 2016-2020 ...................................... 107 Table 21: Comparison of indicators of TVET from 2016-2020 ............................................................ 116 Table 22: Graduates from TVET from 2016-2020 ............................................................................... 116 Table 23: Comparison of indicators of higher education (four public universities) from 2016-2020 120 Table 24: Comparison of indicators of graduates from higher education from 2016-2020 ............... 121 Annex 1: Result Chain ......................................................................................................................... 149 Annex 2: ESSDP 2021-25: Consultation Process ................................................................................. 158 Annex 3: List of MoES 40 priority districts – identified on basis of poor educational performance .. 159 Annex 4: Comparison of education performance ............................................................................... 160 Annex 5: Risk and Mitigation ESSDP 2021-25 ..................................................................................... 162 Annex 6: Projected enrolments, required total financing and expected external financing .............. 172 Annex 7: Statistics of students studying
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 FAO/WFP Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to the Lao People's Democratic Republic
    ISSN 2707-2479 SPECIAL REPORT 2019 FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT MISSION (CFSAM) TO THE LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 9 April 2020 SPECIAL REPORT 2019 FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT MISSION (CFSAM) TO THE LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 9 April 2020 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME Rome, 2020 Required citation: FAO. 2020. Special Report - 2019 FAO/WFP Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission to the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8392en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISSN 2707-2479 [Print] ISSN 2707-2487 [Online] ISBN 978-92-5-132344-1 [FAO] © FAO, 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode).
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbon Surveys
    Gibbon Surveys Nam Phui National Protected Area and Dong Khanthung Provincial Protected Area Phaivanh Phiapalath, PhD Senior Programme Officer Protected Areas Management and Wildlife IUCN Lao PDR Office, Vientiane Veosavanh Saisavanh Technical Officer, Wildlife Unit, Division of Forest Resources Conservation, Department of Forestry With funding support from the United States Embassy to Lao PDR and Fauna & Flora International (FFI) June 2010 Table of Content Title Page Executive Summary…………………………………………………………….…….…….7 Acknowledgments……………………………………..……………………….…………..10 Acronyms………………………………………..…………………………….…………....10 1. Introduction…………………………………...……………………………….………...11 2. Survey Methods………………………………...…………………………….………….11 3. Key findings……………………………………...………………………………….…...16 3.1. Surveys of White-handed Gibbon in Nam Phui NPA………………………......16 3.1.1 Management Status of Nam Phui NPA………………………..………..….17 3.1.2 Current Records of White-handed Gibbons in Nam Phui NPA…...…..…18 3.1.3 Threats of Nam Phui NPA………………………………………………..…20 3.1.4 Other Interesting Findings from the Survey in Nam Phui NPA…….……21 3.1.5 Recommendations for Nam Phui NPA……………...………………….…..22 3.2. Surveys of Pileated Gibbons in Dong Khanthung PPA…………………...…....24 3.2.1 Management Status of Dong Khanthung PPA……………….………..…..24 3.2.2 Current Records of Pileated Gibbons in Dong Khanthung………….……25 3.2.3 Threats to Dong Khanthung PPA………………..…………………….…...25 3.2.4 Other Interesting Findings……………...…………………………….……..27 3.2.5 Confirmation of other Key Wildlife Species in Dong Khanthung PPA………………………………………………….……28 3.2.6 Recommendations for Dong Khanthung PPA………………………...…....32 4. Conclusion……………………..……………………………………………………..…..33 References………………………..……………………………………………….....…...…34 List of Key GPS on survey area and key wildlife records………………………….……35 2 List of Figures Figures Page Figure 1. Map of NPAs and Gibbon distribution in Lao PDR……………………………..12 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of Birds in Laos: a Review of Key Species
    Bird Conservation International (1998) 8:Supplement, pp. 1-159. © BirdLife International 1998 The conservation status of birds in Laos: a review of key species R. M. THEWLIS, R. J. TIMMINS, T. D. EVANS andj. W. DUCKWORTH Summary Laos is an important country for bird conservation. Bird surveys between 1992 and 1996, the first since 1949, covered 20 main areas, with incidental records from many others. This paper reviews the status of all Lao species reported to be of elevated conservation concern (key species) in any of the following categories: Globally Threatened or Globally Near-Threatened (sensu Collar and Andrew 1988 and Collar et ah 1994), and At Risk or Rare in Thailand {sensu Round 1988 and Treesucon and Round 1990). Several additional species are covered which have clearly undergone a National Historical Decline in Laos. A comprehensive review of other Lao species was not possible, and some species which are in truth of conservation concern have doubtless been overlooked. Historical and modern records were reviewed and population trends identified where possible. Current global status listings (Collar et ah 1994) were supported, except that consideration should be given to changing Red-collared Woodpecker Picus rabieri and Sooty Babbler Stachyris herberti from Threatened to Near-Threatened. If the Lao situation is representative of the species throughout their range, then consideration should also be given to placing Ratchet-tailed Treepie Temnurus temnurus and River Lapwing Vanellus duvaucelii as Near-Threatened. Twenty-seven Globally Threatened species are known from Laos, of which there are recent records of 22. There are recent unconfirmed records of two more.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Gibbon Status Review for Lao PDR 2008
    Preliminary Gibbon Status Review for Lao PDR 2008 J.W. Duckworth December 2008 This work was carried out with funding from the Arcus Foundation. Preliminary gibbon status review for Lao PDR 2008 This review is a work in progress for the conservation of gibbons in Lao PDR. It is intended to be updated periodically. Any comment on this document, including further records, would be gratefully received by the author and by Fauna & Flora International, at the addresses below. Citation: J. W. Duckworth, 2008, Preliminary gibbon status review for Lao PDR 2008, Fauna & Flora International, Unpublished report. Author: J. W. Duckworth, PO Box 5773, Vientiane, Lao PDR Email: [email protected] Date: December 2008 For more information or to send further comments contact: Paul Insua-Cao Fauna & Flora Asia-Pacific Programme, 340 Nghi Tam, Hanoi, Vietnam Tel: +84-(0)43-719 4117 Fax: +84-(0)43-719 4119 Email: [email protected] Front cover photo of a captive young yellow-cheeked crested gibbon by Monty Sly. All views expressed within are the author’s alone unless attributed otherwise and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Fauna & Flora International. While the authors and editors strive for rigour and accuracy in presenting this report, Fauna & Flora International make no representations as to completeness, suitability or validity of any information contained, and will not be liable for any errors or omissions. The editors and Fauna & Flora International take no responsibility for any misrepresentation of material resulting from translation of this report into any other language. Reproduction of any part of this report for educational, conservation and other non-profit purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Project for Development of Innovative Research Technique in Genetic
    Project for Development of Innovative Research Technique in Genetic Epidemiology of Malaria and Other Parasitic Diseases in Lao PDR for Containment of Their Expanding Endemicity Project leader: Dr. Shigeyuki Kano Member of staff: Moritoshi Iwagami, Phonepadith Xangsayarath, Phonepadith Khattignavong, Sengdeuane Keomalaphet, Pheovaly Soundala, Lavy Lorphachan, and other visiting scientists and students Background Malaria, Schistosomiasis Schistosoma( mekongi) and Opisthorchiasis (Opisthorchis viverrini) have tremendous health burden on the people in Lao PDR. Although significant reductions in malaria transmission have been reported due to the large-scale insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) distribution through the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, strategies based on the scientific evidence have not been developed to deal with the genetic variation in parasites and vectors population, and drug resistant malaria. Recently, artemisinin resistant malaria was reported in Attapeu province in 2014 (Ashley et al., 2014). Therefore, it is necessary to survey other provinces especially in the southern part of the country to monitor and contain the spread of drug resistant malaria. Lao Ministry of Health and WHO set a goal to eliminate malaria by 2030. To achieve this goal, we have to understand real malaria situation including drug resistant malaria and to develop elimination strategies. Since Schistosomiasis (S. mekongi) and Opisthorchiasis (O. viverrini) are localized to Lao PDR and surrounding countries, they are recognized as neglected tropical diseases. Nevertheless, the prevalence of Opisthorchiasis is estimated as high as 15-54% in Lao PDR. Little information on the molecular/genetic epidemiology of the Opisthorchiasis is available to develop effective measures for prevention and diagnosis of the diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Education (Girls) Project
    Completion Report Project Number: 29288 Loan Number: 1621 July 2008 Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Basic Education (Girls) Project CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – kip (KN) At Appraisal At Project Completion 30 April 1998 31 July 2007 KN1.00 = $0.000419 $0.000104 $1.00 = KN2,383.50 KN9,550 ABBREVIATIONS CCED – committee for community education and development DEB – district education bureau DNFE – Department of Non-Formal Education EA – executing agency EMIS – education management information system EQIP – Education Quality Improvement Project GDP – gross domestic product GEMEU – Gender and Ethnic Minorities Education Unit Lao PDR – Lao People’s Democratic Republic MOE – Ministry of Education NGO – nongovernment organization NRIES – National Research Institute for Educational Science PES – provincial education service PWG – project working group RRP – report and recommendation of the President TA – technical assistance TTC – teacher training center NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government ends on 30 September. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2008 ends on 30 September 2008. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars Vice President C. Lawrence Greenwood, Jr. Operations 2 Director General A. Thapan, Southeast Asia Department (SERD) Director G.H. Kim, Lao Resident Mission (LRM), SERD Team leader K. Chanthy, Senior Project Implementation Officer, LRM, SERD Team member S. Souannavong, Assistant Project Analyst, LRM, SERD iii CONTENTS Page BASIC DATA i I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 2 A. Relevance of Design and Formulation 2 B. Project Outputs 4 C. Project Costs 7 D. Disbursements 7 E. Project Schedule 7 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Progress Report July – September 2008
    Lao People's Democratic Republic Prime Minister Office (NLCRDPA) Poverty Reduction Fund Quarterly Progress Report July – September 2008 Program Management Team Vientiane, November 200 8 PRF National Office at Ministry for Planning and Investment Luang Prabang Road P.O. Box 4625 tel. +856 (0)21 261 479/480 fax +856 (0)21 261 481 [email protected] www.prflaos.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. 5 2. ACHIEVEMENTS IN CYCLE IV AND CYCLE V .............................................. 6 2.1. Brief summary of Cycle IV implementation ..................................................6 2.2. Cycle V implementation progress .....................................................................6 2.2.1. Work progress by province .............................................................................................. 6 2.2.2. Comparison of work progress and disbursement ............................................................. 8 2.3. Community Contribution for Cycle V ..............................................................8 2.4. Analysis of Cycle V subprojects’ implementation .........................................10 2.4.1. Variance of subproject changes by sector...................................................................... 10 2.4.2. Variance of budget changes by sector ........................................................................... 10 3. LAUNCH OF CYCLE VI ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF En Anglais
    The World Bank Asia Sustainable and Public Disclosure Authorized Alternative Energy Program Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Lao PDR Power to the People: Twenty Years of National Electrification Public Disclosure Authorized Copyright © 2012 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA All rights reserved First printing: January 2012 Manufactured in the United States of America. Photo credits (cover): Yan Li and Jie Tang The World Bank Asia Sustainable and Alternative Energy Program Lao PDR Power to the People: Twenty Years of National Electrification Copyright © 2012 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA All rights reserved First printing: January 2012 Manufactured in the United States of America. Photo credits: World Bank, EDL The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, or its affiliated organizations, or to members of its board of executive directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................v Abbreviations and Acronyms/Currency ................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lao Pdr: Transport Sector Brief
    LAO PDR: TRANSPORT SECTOR BRIEF East Asia and Pacific Region Transport Sector Unit Alberto Nogales - Version: May 1, 2004* 1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SECTOR Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR or Lao) has a population of 5.5 million (2002) that is growing at 2.6% per year. With 236,800 km2 of land area, it does not have access to the sea; has one of the lowest population densities in the region (23 people/km2) (its share of rural population is 65%); and a very low GNI per capita, estimated at US$300 in 2002. Lao is surrounded by roughly 244 million people from five countries: Vietnam (80), Cambodia (12), Thailand (61), Myanmar (48), and China’s Yunnan Province (43). During the last fifteen years Lao has been in the process of transforming its economy from a centrally planned system to one that is market-oriented. In the past ten years, the macroeconomic performance has improved significantly; yet, the situation remains fragile and further efforts are necessary to maintain stability. Despite all the progress achieved, Lao has some of the lowest social indicators in the Southeast Asia region. Agriculture remains the major sector of the economy contributing more than 50% of GDP and employing over 80% of the labor force. Vientiane the main capital city and largest urban concentration with 663,000 inhabitants (2001) has more than 60% of the country’s urban population. The three other main cities, are Luang Phrabang, Pakse, and Savannakhet. In the absence of a railway system and access to the sea, Lao PDR depends primarily on road transport and, to less extent, on river and air transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Champasak Province
    - 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 9 Investment Opportunities in LAOS CHAMPASAK PROVINCE Champasak Province Sky-rocketing FDIs since 2000 Untapped business potentials Strategic Location “The emerging Resource rich – low cost investment destina- Attractive Incentives tion in South East One Stop Shop Service Unit Asia” Conducive Investment Climate TABLE of CONTENTS Welcoming Address by the Governor 3 Champasak Province: Dynamism and Profile of the Local Economy 4 Geographic Location & Economic Data 5 Investment Climate 6 Foreign Direct Investment 7 Economic Map of Champasak Province 8 Foreign and Domestic Investment Calling List 9 Priority Investment Areas: Tourism, Agri-Business, Industry 12 Investment Incentives 16 Overview of Facilities and Costs 17 Human Resources 19 Financial Services 21 22 Quality of Life Official Agencies in Champasak Province 23 Welcoming Address by the Governor of Champasak Province s a result of the implementation of the socio-economic development A plan in the fiscal year 2007/2008, Champasak Province has seen an over- all increasing trend: Estimated income per capita rose from US$ 606 in 2006/2007 to US$ 730 in 2007/2008. At provincial level, poverty rate remains at 5% of a total of 107,092 families. In addition the GDP growth rate over the last ten years is very promising. Macro-economic indicators, embracing government‘s policies and objectives - have accomplished a considerable satisfactory level. Governor of Champasak Province Champasak Province authority in particular works hard to reduce poverty and to improve livelihood in rural areas. Provincial leaders together with departments, committees and relevant sectors, as well as the central government bodies, have put all their efforts in seeking additional funds for the provincial budget and utilizing all means for in- vestments into some fundamental infrastructures.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Local Ecological Knowledge to Monitor Threatened Mekong Megafauna in Lao PDR
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Using local ecological knowledge to monitor threatened Mekong megafauna in Lao PDR Thomas N. E. Gray1¤*, Amphone Phommachak2, Kongseng Vannachomchan2, Francois Guegan2 1 WWF Greater Mekong, 21, Boeun Keng Kang 1, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2 WWF-Laos, Unit 05, Saylom Village, Vientiane, Lao Democratic People's Republic ¤ Current address: Wildlife Alliance, Toul Tompoung 1, Phnom Penh, Cambodia * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 Pressures on freshwater biodiversity in Southeast Asia are accelerating yet the status and conservation needs of many of the region's threatened fish species are unclear. This impacts the ability to implement conservation activities and to understand the effects of infrastructure developments and other hydrological changes. We used Local Ecological Knowledge from fishing communities on the Mekong River in the Siphandone waterscape, OPEN ACCESS Lao PDR to estimate mean and mode last capture dates of eight rare or culturally significant Citation: Gray TNE, Phommachak A, fish species in order to provide conservation monitoring baselines. One hundred and twenty Vannachomchan K, Guegan F (2017) Using local ecological knowledge to monitor threatened fishermen, from six villages, were interviewed. All eight species had been captured, by at Mekong megafauna in Lao PDR. PLoS ONE 12(8): least one of the interviewees, within the waterscape within the past year. However the mean e0183247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. and mode last capture dates varied between the species. Larger species, and those with pone.0183247 higher Red List threat status, were caught less recently than smaller species of less conser- Editor: Z. Daniel Deng, Pacific Northwest National vation concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Transition in Lowland Southern Laos: Implications for Rural Livelihoods
    Agrarian Transition in Lowland Southern Laos: Implications for Rural Livelihoods Vongpaphane Manivong BSc (Economics) MPhil (Agricultural Economics) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of Agriculture and Food Sciences Abstract Despite being a low-income, agriculture-based country with a subsistence orientation, Laos is in the early stages of a major economic transformation whereby rural households have been experiencing rapid change in their farming and livelihood systems. Some households have begun to engage in semi-commercial farming while others have adopted labour-oriented or migration- oriented livelihood strategies. This study explores livelihood strategies of rural households in lowland rice-based farming systems in Southern Laos in relation to government policies for agricultural development and the agrarian transition occurring in Laos and the region. The analytical framework used for this study draws on farming systems economics, agrarian systems analysis, and rural livelihoods analysis. Data were obtained from six villages in the lowlands of Champasak Province in Southern Laos through key informant interviews, village group discussions, household surveys, and household case studies. Survey and case study data were supplemented with project and historical agronomic trial results in order to construct model budgets for various input scenarios of rice production. To allow for the production and market risks facing farmers, the budgeting analysis was supplemented by the techniques of sensitivity analysis, threshold analysis, and risk analysis. The study shows that Lao farmers in areas such as the lowlands of Champasak are caught up in, and contributing to, a much larger regional process of agrarian transition.
    [Show full text]