Bulletin )Berlin College Fall 1972

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bulletin )Berlin College Fall 1972 ILLEN MEMORIAL ART MUSEUM BULLETIN )BERLIN COLLEGE FALL 1972 , ( ALLEN MEMORIAL ART MUSEUM BULLETIN VOLUME XXX, NUMBER 1 FALL 1972 Contents Pompeo Batoni's Portrait of John Wodehouse by Anthony M. Clark ----- 2 The Dating of Creto-Venetian Icons: A Reconsideration in Light of New Evidence by Thalia Gouma Peterson - 12 A Sheet of Figure Studies at Oberlin and Other Drawings by Daniele da Volterra by Paul Barolsky ----- 22 Notes Oberlin-Ashland Archaeological Society 37 Baldwin Lecture Series 1972-73 37 Loans to Museums and Institutions 37 Exhibitions 1972-73 40 Friends of Art Film Series - - - - 41 Friends of Art Concert Series 41 Friends of the Museum ----- 42 Published three times a year by the Allen Art Museum, Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio. $6.00 a year, this issue $2.00; mailed free to members of the Oberlin Friends of Art. Printed by the Press of the Times, Oberlin, Ohio. 1. Pompeo Batoni, John Wodehouse Oberlin Pompeo Batoni's Portrait of John Wodehouse In March, 1761, Giovanni Battista Tiepolo wrote Count Algarotti regarding sketches of his for a commission for S. Marco in Rome: 'You then do me the pleasure of sending me the news of Batoni's indulgence about the small sketches. ."' One wonders what Raphael Mengs, just finishing his Villa Albani ceiling, thought of Tiepolo's sketches. Three decades younger than Tiepolo, Mengs was now a famous painter whose opinion would have carried weight. Both Batoni (1708-1787) and Mengs were favored by the new Venetian pope, Clement XIII (whom they painted in 1760 and 1758 respectively), and by this pope's dis­ tinguished family; also, both artists at least indirectly can be connected with the Venetian church in Rome, S. Marco at Palazzo Venezia. Batoni, a decade younger than Tiepolo, apparently admired the Venetian paint­ er. Mengs sailed from Italy in October, 1761 to become court painter at Madrid, to be followed by Tiepolo the next year. Mengs' absence from Rome until 1771, and again from 1773 to 1777 (he died in Rome in 1779), was not unfavorable to Pompeo Batoni, who remained unrivalled as the most famous native Italian master. From the 1740's Batoni had been the leading painter in Rome. By 1754 most connoisseurs considered him the finest painter in Italy and from this year he had become also Italy's prime portrait painter. In 1759 Winckelmann, Mengs' friend, gave his extraordinarily high praise to Batoni's Wyndham portrait, and, despite the slightly later puffs of "Ella poscia mi fa il piacere di avanzarmi le Notizie del Compatimento datto dal sig. Battoni di Roma alii piccioli Modelli . ." (P. G. Molmenti, Tiepolo, Paris, 1911, 24 and 41). Mengs' more "modern" portraits, the German artist was never truly to surpass the Italian as the portraitist. Yet, as if shepherding Batoni away from prominence in subject painting and towards a more exclusive trade in portraits (to the advantage of Mengs), Winckelmann, in January 1761, tore Batoni's latest historical masterpiece, The Departure of Hec­ tor, to pieces.2 The handsome Batoni portrait at Oberlin (fig. I)3 bears the inscribed date of 1762, and this is possibly correct for its commission. The subject is also given in the inscription although this cannot be dated earlier than 1797 when John Wodehouse (1741-1834), a Baronet's son, was created 1st Baron Wodehouse of Kimbcrley in appreciation of his serv­ ice as Member of Parliament for Norfolk (1784-1797). Wodehouse appears as a stylish and prosperous twenty-one year old on the Grand Tour; his main memorial, aside from his title, is the Batoni portrait. I know little else about him excepting a September, 1771 report from Rome that a certain (possibly the same) "Mr. Wodehouse is still in Sicily,"4 and his presence in Rome, as we shall see, in 1764. Wodehouse is shown in the portrait at an imaginary site in the Roman Campagna, leaning on a plinth which supports the pedestal of a marble vase with a Bacchic relief otherwise unknown to me. He wears a sword, the hilt of which is silver parcel-gilt, and a suit of deep ultra­ marine with gold trim, fresh lace, and a loose black cravat. Wodehouse also wears his own hair, mouse-colored except as it moves blonde into the light and brown into deeper shadow. The face is lively and fleshy, pink and healthy, and looks away, rather ironical and appetitive, with blue eyes under cocked blonde brows. It is a secure and telling likeness of a self-assured, mature but very young man. Although there is ob­ vious accuracy in the likeness one can tell very little about the man, who is shown favorably and typically. The typicality seems to me to depend on what Professor Gombrich might wish to call a "conceptual" rather than an "evocative" presentation; on Batoni's accurate flattery; and on Wodehouse's youth. Subtly, learnedly and genially wrought, the portrait has force and animation but avoids "psychological depth" or at least skepticism. The vivid and careful craft may itself possess 2 For a more detailed account of Batoni's career and his portrait practices, see the author's essay in: Pompeo Batoni, Catalogo della Mostra, Lucca 1967, pp. 23-50. 3 Ace. No. 70.60. Oil on fabric, 53W"x38Vi" (138x100 cm.). Sale in London (Sotheby), December 2, 1964, lot 10, the property of the Earl of Kimberley (bought in?); Ferdinando Peretti, London. 4 Letter from James Byres in Rome to Sir William Constable, 30 Sept., 1771, in East Riding Co. Records Office, Beverly, Yorks. I owe this reference to the kind­ ness of Mr. G. W. Beard. 2. Pompeo Batoni, Georgina, Countess Spencer Courtesy of the Earl Spencer, Althorp 3. Pompeo Batoni, David Garrick Ashmolean, Oxford psychological depth, and somehow one does not feel that Wodehouse bought only a fashionable or frivolous portrait. We know the material origins of the Oberlin portrait as far as its sitter, artist and date are concerned. We also know that it was on view in Batoni's showroom on the 6th of May 1764, in the artist's palace several blocks from Piazza di Spagna where it was painted. On that date another British Grand Tourist, James Martin, recorded in his travel diary:5 "wt. to Battoni's the Portrait Painter & saw7 some very strong Likenesses of Lady Spencer, Mrs. Macartey, Mr. Garrick, Mr. Wod- house [sic], ac [etc.]. He has also painted an excellent Picture represent­ ing Hercules between Virtue & Pleasure." On May 7th Martin went about Rome (and back to Batoni's) with Lord Exeter, William Chambers the architect, Abbe Grant, and others including Wodehouse. The "Macartey" portrait is lost; presumably it was of a Macarthy who accompanied his mother and Lord Exeter to Italy in 1763-64. The seated portrait of Georgina, Countess Spencer, signed and dated 1764, exists and is the same size as the Wodehmtse (fig. 2). The portrait of David Garrick (fig. 3) dates also to 1764, and hangs in the Ashmolean Museum. It is a smaller, more particular likeness than either Wode- house's or Countess Spencer's. The great actor's right hand, hanging over an illustrated volume of Terence, may be compared with Wode- house's left hand dangling over the plinth: they are contemporary cousins. Finally, the Hercules at the Crossroads (fig. 4) which Martin saw is the large picture then in progress (it is signed and dated 1765) and now in the Hermitage. The young English buck at Oberlin has obviously chosen a road different from that of the introspective hero. Batoni would have produced over a dozen full- and three-quarter length portraits in both 1762 or 1764 and about a half-dozen half-lengths. The latter would not necessarily have been cheaper — most of them were even more carefully detailed and more exquisitely fine than the Garrick. The superb 1762 three-quarter length Cardinal de Roche- chouart formerly in the New York Historical Society, or the 1764 half- length Archbishop Mansi, and the 1764 three-quarter length Edward, Duke of York, are all of the more studied, highly wrought variety which Batoni reserved for his grandest customers — and which was less appli­ cable to Wodehouse than to the Countess Spencer and David Garrick. The price, according to size, was probably the same for all customers, although the "fringe benefits" from the grandees, both direct and in­ direct, were considerable. I owe this unpublished information to the very great generosity of Mr. Brinsley Ford. There are many varieties of Batoni poses and there is no dichotomy between what can be termed the more characteristic and the more in­ formal poses. Though popes and princes are raised occasionally to iconic heights, it is usually the attention and craft refinement that overwhelms the spectator before their portraits, and they are carefully observed and characteristically but quite informally posed. The matter of grace, so carefully arranged in eighteenth century art, perhaps obscures this point (as in the Countess Spencer's portrait), but it is nevertheless in Batoni faithful and true to experience. Although his portraits are more idealized and typical than those of the slightly more hard-boiled contemporary French and later British portrait painters, Batoni, with so many vacationing customers on his hands, was necessarily a master of informal poses. The credit due him for "natural" poses in outdoors or "realistic" settings has, however, been somewhat exaggerated, owing to ignorance of his Roman predecessors. Also, Batoni quite obviously depended on stock poses, which he handled with considerable social discretion (cleverly gauging the tolerance and ignorance of the consumer), although a computer could dispose of them in a wink.
Recommended publications
  • The Ieonography of Sanctuary Doors from Patmos and Its Place in The
    The Ieonography of Sanctuary Doors from Patmos and its Place in the Iconographie program of the Byzantine Ieonostasis By Georgios Kellaris A thesls sutmitted to the Facu1ty of Graduate Studies { and Research in partial fulfi1lment of the requirernents for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Art history McGill University March, 1991 © Georgios Kellaris 1991 Montréal, Québec, canada ---------~~- - ---- il The lconostasis is the most characteristic feature of the Orthodox Church. The metaphyslcal conception of the space of the church prQnpted its emergence, and the ~tical Interpretation of the Liturgy deter~ned its evolution. These aspects were reflected in the iconographie program of the iconostasis. The sanctuary dOOIS are the only part of tt.e Patmlan iconostases bearing figurative decoIatlon. The study of the themes on the doors reveals an iconographie program with strong lituIglcal character. Furthermore, this program encompasses the entire range of the ~tical syrrbol1sm pertaining to the iconostasis. The anal}JSis indicates that the doors are instrumental in the function of the iconostasis as a liturgical device aim1ng at a greater unitY between the earthly and the divine realms. ill 1 L t iconostase est un élément Indispe... .Able de l'Église OrthodoAe. La raison de sa naissance se trouve dans la conception métaphysique de l'éspace ecclésiastique et sa évolution a été determlné par l'interprétë.\tion mystique de la 11 turgie. Ces aspects sont reflétés par le progranme iconographique de l'iconostase. Dctns les iconostases de PatIOOs la porte est la seule section où se trouve des décorations figuratives. L'étude de thémes trouvé sur ces portes révéle un programne iconographique de caractère liturgique.
    [Show full text]
  • Icone Di Roma E Del Lazio 1
    Icone di Roma e del Lazio 1 Icone di Roma Giorgio Leone Icone di Roma e del Lazio 1 Giorgio Leone Repertori dell’Arte del Lazio - 5/6 G. LEONE ICONE DI ROMA E DEL LAZIO ISBN 978-88-8265-731-4 Museo Soprintendenza per i Beni Storici, Artistici In copertina: Diffuso ed Etnoantropologici del Lazio Direzione Regionale per i Beni Culturali Madonna Advocata detta Madonna di San Sisto, tavola, cm 71.5 x 42.5, Chiesa del Rosario Lazio e Paesaggistici del Lazio a Monte Mario, Roma, particolare «L’ERMA» «L’ERMA» di BRETSCHNEIDER Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali Soprintendenza per i Beni Storici, Artistici ed Etnoantropologici del Lazio (Repertori, 5-6) Giorgio Leone Icone di Roma e del Lazio I TOMO «L’ERMA» di BRETSCHNEIDER GIORGIO LEONE Icone di Roma e del Lazio Repertori dell'Arte del Lazio 5-6 Soprintendenza per i Beni Storici, «L’ERMA» di BRETSCHNEIDER Artistici ed Etnoantropologici del Lazio Direzione editoriale Progetto scientifico e Roberto Marcucci direzione della collana Soprintendente ANNA IMPONENTE Redazione ROSSELLA VODRET Elena Montani Segreteria del Soprintendente Daniele Maras Laura Ceccarelli Dario Scianetti Direzione scientifica Rosalia Pagliarani Maurizio Pinto ANNA IMPONENTE con la collaborazione di Giorgia Corrado Rossella Corcione Coordinamento scientifico Archivio Fotografico Elaborazione immagini e impaginazione integrata GIORGIO LEONE Graziella Frezza, responsabile Soprintendenza Speciale per il Alessandra Montedoro Dario Scianetti Claudio Fabbri Maurizio Pinto Patrimonio Storico, Artistico ed Rossella Corcione
    [Show full text]
  • The Madre Della Consolazione Icon in the British Museum: Post-Byzantine Painting, Painters and Society on Crete*
    JAHRBUCH DER ÖSTERREICHISCHEN BYZANTINISTIK, 53. Band/2003, 239–255 © 2003 by Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien ANGELIKI LYMBEROPOULOU / BIRMINGHAM THE MADRE DELLA CONSOLAZIONE ICON IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM: POST-BYZANTINE PAINTING, PAINTERS AND SOCIETY ON CRETE* With two plates A small portable icon (350 × 270 mm), now in the British Museum, Department of Medieval and Later Antiquities (reg. No. 1994, 1–2, 6), depicts the Virgin and Child (fig. 1). It is painted on a single panel of pine wood, apparently without fabric between the ground and wood support. The icon was bequeathed by Guy Holford Dixon JP, who bought it from the Temple Gallery. A label on the back, attached when the icon was in the possession of the Temple Gallery, describes it as being Russian of the six- teenth century. In a preliminary Museum catalogue, however, the origin was given as Italy or Crete and the date as seventeenth century.1 The truth about the origin and the dating of the icon, as we shall see, lies in the mid- dle: I will argue that it is from Crete and of the sixteenth century. The Virgin is depicted half-length, holding the Christ-Child in her right arm while touching His left leg gently with her left hand. Her head is tilted towards the Child, although she does not look at Him. She wears a green garment and a purple maphorion on top, which bears pseudo-kufic decoration on the edges; decorative motives are also visible on the gar- ment’s collar and left sleeve. The maphorion is held together in front of the Virgin’s chest with a golden brooch, which apparently used to have decora- tion, now lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Raphael in Rome. Style, Technique, Conservation
    Raphael in Rome. Style, technique, conservation The restoration of the frescoes carried out in the This publication is the result of the skilful work Vatican’s Stanza della Segnatura and Stanza di Eliodoro, undertaken by several specialists, within the Vatican and on the Madonna del Divino Amore in the Capodimonte outside. Museum in Naples, and on La Perla and Lo Spasimo in the Prado in Madrid, and the programme of technical The studies proposed at the 2014 conference are now investigations which has run alongside this work, has available for the many interested people who were made a substantial body of documentary material unable to attend the meeting or who wish to refresh available. New academic hypotheses formulated on the RRaphael in Rome their knowledge of what was said at the time. basis of these materials are here discussed by specialists in problems concerning Raphael and early sixteenth- SStyle, technique, conservation The editors of this work have been able to harmonize century Italian painting. contributions that present different aspects of Raphael, The fruits of the dialogue between art historians and the master of the Vatican Rooms, into a coherent text, restorers, the texts and the sensational photographic important for studies on Raphael. documentation that we present in this volume, allow us to look with new eyes and from a previously unexplored Barbara Jatta angle – but one which in some cases, as we have seen, boasts very early precedents – at the grand unfolding of stylistic development and inspired inventiveness in Raphael’s technical researches. Barbara Agosti and Silvia Ginzburg ISBN 978-88-8271-395-9 EDIZIONI MUSEI VATICANI € 59,00 Foreword Barbara Agosti, Silvia Ginzburg In the papers developed for this volume, restorers and art historians propose the results of conservation and research focused on works that represent some of the most significant stages in Raphael’s Roman period, beginning in 1508 and concluding with his death in 1520.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Art and Architecture
    Renaissance Art and Architecture from the libraries of Professor Craig Hugh Smyth late Director of the Institute of Fine Arts, New York University; Director, I Tatti, Florence; Ph.D., Princeton University & Professor Robert Munman Associate Professor Emeritus of the University of Illinois; Ph.D., Harvard University 2552 titles in circa 3000 physical volumes Craig Hugh Smyth Craig Hugh Smyth, 91, Dies; Renaissance Art Historian By ROJA HEYDARPOUR Published: January 1, 2007 Craig Hugh Smyth, an art historian who drew attention to the importance of conservation and the recovery of purloined art and cultural objects, died on Dec. 22 in Englewood, N.J. He was 91 and lived in Cresskill, N.J. The New York Times, 1964 Craig Hugh Smyth The cause was a heart attack, his daughter, Alexandra, said. Mr. Smyth led the first academic program in conservation in the United States in 1960 as the director of the Institute of Fine Arts at New York University. Long before he began his academic career, he worked in the recovery of stolen art. After the defeat of Germany in World War II, Mr. Smyth was made director of the Munich Central Collecting Point, set up by the Allies for works that they retrieved. There, he received art and cultural relics confiscated by the Nazis, cared for them and tried to return them to their owners or their countries of origin. He served as a lieutenant in the United States Naval Reserve during the war, and the art job was part of his military service. Upon returning from Germany in 1946, he lectured at the Frick Collection and, in 1949, was awarded a Fulbright research fellowship, which took him to Florence, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ieonography of Sanctuary Doors from Patmos and Its Place In
    The Ieonography of Sanctuary Doors from Patmos and its Place in the Iconographie program of the Byzantine Ieonostasis By Georgios Kellaris A thesls sutmitted to the Facu1ty of Graduate Studies { and Research in partial fulfi1lment of the requirernents for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Art history McGill University March, 1991 © Georgios Kellaris 1991 Montréal, Québec, canada ---------~~- - ---- il The lconostasis is the most characteristic feature of the Orthodox Church. The metaphyslcal conception of the space of the church prQnpted its emergence, and the ~tical Interpretation of the Liturgy deter~ned its evolution. These aspects were reflected in the iconographie program of the iconostasis. The sanctuary dOOIS are the only part of tt.e Patmlan iconostases bearing figurative decoIatlon. The study of the themes on the doors reveals an iconographie program with strong lituIglcal character. Furthermore, this program encompasses the entire range of the ~tical syrrbol1sm pertaining to the iconostasis. The anal}JSis indicates that the doors are instrumental in the function of the iconostasis as a liturgical device aim1ng at a greater unitY between the earthly and the divine realms. ill 1 L t iconostase est un élément Indispe... .Able de l'Église OrthodoAe. La raison de sa naissance se trouve dans la conception métaphysique de l'éspace ecclésiastique et sa évolution a été determlné par l'interprétë.\tion mystique de la 11 turgie. Ces aspects sont reflétés par le progranme iconographique de l'iconostase. Dctns les iconostases de PatIOOs la porte est la seule section où se trouve des décorations figuratives. L'étude de thémes trouvé sur ces portes révéle un programne iconographique de caractère liturgique.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniele Da Volterra. I Dipinti D'elci
    Daniele da Volterra. I dipinti d'Elci Gallerie Nazionali di Arte Antica - Galleria Corsini Roma, via della Lungara 10 mostra a cura di Barbara Agosti e Vittoria Romani Preview stampa: giovedì 16 febbraio, ore 11.00 Inaugurazione e apertura straordinaria: giovedì 16 febbraio, ore 18.30 – 22.00 Apertura mostra: 17 febbraio - 7 maggio 2017 COMUNICATO STAMPA Le Gallerie Nazionali di Arte Antica presentano nella sede della Galleria Corsini dal 17 febbraio al 7 maggio 2017 Daniele da Vol- terra. I dipinti d'Elci, una mostra a cura di Barbara Agosti e Vitto- ria Romani incentrata su due dipinti di Daniele da Volterra (Vol- terra, 1509 – Roma, 1566), l’artista che più fu vicino a Michelangelo nella sua esperienza creativa e umana. Un evento di grande interesse, infatti la tela con Elia nel deserto e la tavola con la Madonna con il Bambino, san Giovannino e santa Barbara, sottoposte a vincolo di tutela sin dal 1979, sono due delle rare opere mobili dell’artista che si sono conservate. Custoditi da oltre un secolo in una collezione privata senese, quella dei Conti Pannocchieschi d’Elci, cui pervennero per via ereditaria da Casa Ricciarelli, i due quadri, riconosciuti come capo- lavori da una ormai antica e autorevole tradizione critica, raramen- te sono stati esposti al pubblico e, come scrive nella prefazione del catalogo Flaminia Gennari Santori, direttore del Museo: “È questa la prima occasione nel corso della mia direzione in cui le Gallerie Barberini Corsini ospitano dipinti provenienti da una colle- zione privata: ritengo che il dialogo tra il museo e l’universo del collezionismo possa innescare un circolo virtuoso di conoscenza, scoperta e condivisione pubblica del nostro patrimonio artistico ed è un percorso che le Gallerie proseguiranno nel futuro”.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 09: Michelangelo- from High Renaissance to Mannerism
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Art Appreciation Open Educational Resource 2020 Lesson 09: Michelangelo- From High Renaissance to Mannerism Marie Porterfield Barry East Tennessee State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/art-appreciation-oer Part of the Art and Design Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Editable versions are available for this document and other Art Appreciation lessons at https://dc.etsu.edu/art-appreciation-oer. Recommended Citation Barry, Marie Porterfield, "Lesson 09: Michelangelo- rF om High Renaissance to Mannerism" (2020). Art Appreciation Open Educational Resource. East Tennessee State University: Johnson City. https://dc.etsu.edu/art-appreciation-oer/10 This Book Contribution is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Art Appreciation Open Educational Resource by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Michelangelo from High Renaissance to Mannerism” is part of the ART APPRECIATION Open Educational Resource by Marie Porterfield Barry East Tennessee State University, 2020 Introduction This course explores the world’s visual arts, focusing on the development of visual awareness, assessment, and appreciation by examining a variety of styles from various periods and cultures while emphasizing the development of a common visual language. The materials are meant to foster a broader understanding of the role of visual art in human culture and experience from the prehistoric through the contemporary. This is an Open Educational Resource (OER), an openly licensed educational material designed to replace a traditional textbook.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Gallery Review of the Year 2007-2008
    NG Review 2008 cover.qxd 26/11/08 13:17 Page 1 the national gallerythe national of the year review 2008 april 2007 ‒ march THE NATIONAL GALLERY review of the year april 2007 ‒ march 2008 the national gallery the national NG Review 2008 cover.qxd 28/11/08 17:09 Page 2 © The National Gallery 2008 Photographic credits ISBN 978-1-85709-457-2 All images © The National Gallery, London, unless ISSN 0143 9065 stated below Published by National Gallery Company on behalf of the Trustees Front cover: Paul Gauguin, Bowl of Fruit and The National Gallery Tankard before A Window (detail), probably 1890 Trafalgar Square London WC2N 5DN Back cover: A cyclist stops in a London street to admire a reproduction of Rubens’s Samson and Tel: 020 7747 2885 Delilah, part of The Grand Tour www.nationalgallery.org.uk [email protected] Frontispiece Room 29, The National Gallery © Iain Crockart Printed and bound by Westerham Press Ltd. St Ives plc p. 9 Editors: Karen Morden and Rebecca McKie Diego Velázquez, Prince Baltasar Carlos in the Riding Designed by Tim Harvey School, private collection. Photo © The National Gallery, London p. 18 Sebastiano del Piombo, Portrait of a Lady, private collection © The National Gallery, courtesy of the owner Paul Gauguin, Still Life with Mangoes © Private collection, 2007 p. 19 Richard Parkes Bonington, La Ferté © The National Gallery, London. Accepted in lieu of Tax Edouard Vuillard, The Earthenware Pot © Private collection p. 20 Pietro Orioli, The Virgin and Child with Saints Jerome, Bernardino, Catherine of Alexandria and Francis © Ashmolean Museum, University of Oxford p.
    [Show full text]
  • Sebastiano Del Piombo and His Collaboration with Michelangelo: Distance and Proximity to the Divine in Catholic Reformation Rome
    SEBASTIANO DEL PIOMBO AND HIS COLLABORATION WITH MICHELANGELO: DISTANCE AND PROXIMITY TO THE DIVINE IN CATHOLIC REFORMATION ROME by Marsha Libina A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland April, 2015 © 2015 Marsha Libina All Rights Reserved Abstract This dissertation is structured around seven paintings that mark decisive moments in Sebastiano del Piombo’s Roman career (1511-47) and his collaboration with Michelangelo. Scholarship on Sebastiano’s collaborative works with Michelangelo typically concentrates on the artists’ division of labor and explains the works as a reconciliation of Venetian colorito (coloring) and Tuscan disegno (design). Consequently, discourses of interregional rivalry, center and periphery, and the normativity of the Roman High Renaissance become the overriding terms in which Sebastiano’s work is discussed. What has been overlooked is Sebastiano’s own visual intelligence, his active rather than passive use of Michelangelo’s skills, and the novelty of his works, made in response to reform currents of the early sixteenth century. This study investigates the significance behind Sebastiano’s repeating, slowing down, and narrowing in on the figure of Christ in his Roman works. The dissertation begins by addressing Sebastiano’s use of Michelangelo’s drawings as catalysts for his own inventions, demonstrating his investment in collaboration and strategies of citation as tools for artistic image-making. Focusing on Sebastiano’s reinvention of his partner’s drawings, it then looks at the ways in which the artist engaged with the central debates of the Catholic Reformation – debates on the Church’s mediation of the divine, the role of the individual in the path to personal salvation, and the increasingly problematic distance between the layperson and God.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelangelo Buonarotti
    MICHELANGELO BUONAROTTI Portrait of Michelangelo by Daniele da Volterra COMPILED BY HOWIE BAUM Portrait of Michelangelo at the time when he was painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. by Marcello Venusti Hi, my name is Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni, but you can call me Michelangelo for short. MICHAELANGO’S BIRTH AND YOUTH Michelangelo was born to Leonardo di Buonarrota and Francesca di Neri del Miniato di Siena, a middle- class family of bankers in the small village of Caprese, in Tuscany, Italy. He was the 2nd of five brothers. For several generations, his Father’s family had been small-scale bankers in Florence, Italy but the bank failed, and his father, Ludovico di Leonardo Buonarroti Simoni, briefly took a government post in Caprese. Michelangelo was born in this beautiful stone home, in March 6,1475 (546 years ago) and it is now a museum about him. Once Michelangelo became famous because of his beautiful sculptures, paintings, and poetry, the town of Caprese was named Caprese Michelangelo, which it is still named today. HIS GROWING UP YEARS BETWEEN 6 AND 13 His mother's unfortunate and prolonged illness forced his father to place his son in the care of his nanny. The nanny's husband was a stonecutter, working in his own father's marble quarry. In 1481, when Michelangelo was six years old, his mother died yet he continued to live with the pair until he was 13 years old. As a child, he was always surrounded by chisels and stone. He joked that this was why he loved to sculpt in marble.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Review/La Revue Historique
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by National Documentation Centre - EKT journals The Historical Review/La Revue Historique Vol. 11, 2014 Index Hatzopoulos Marios https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.339 Copyright © 2014 To cite this article: Hatzopoulos, M. (2014). Index. The Historical Review/La Revue Historique, 11, I-XCII. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.339 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 21/02/2020 08:44:40 | INDEX, VOLUMES I-X Compiled by / Compilé par Marios Hatzopoulos http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 21/02/2020 08:44:40 | http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 21/02/2020 08:44:40 | INDEX Aachen (Congress of) X/161 Académie des Inscriptions et Belles- Abadan IX/215-216 Lettres, Paris II/67, 71, 109; III/178; Abbott (family) VI/130, 132, 138-139, V/79; VI/54, 65, 71, 107; IX/174-176 141, 143, 146-147, 149 Académie des Sciences, Inscriptions et Abbott, Annetta VI/130, 142, 144-145, Belles-Lettres de Toulouse VI/54 147-150 Academy of France I/224; V/69, 79 Abbott, Bartolomew Edward VI/129- Acciajuoli (family) IX/29 132, 136-138, 140-157 Acciajuoli, Lapa IX/29 Abbott, Canella-Maria VI/130, 145, 147- Acciarello VII/271 150 Achaia I/266; X/306 Abbott, Caroline Sarah VI/149-150 Achilles I/64 Abbott, George Frederic (the elder) VI/130 Acropolis II/70; III/69; VIII/87 Abbott, George Frederic (the younger) Acton, John VII/110 VI/130, 136, 138-139, 141-150, 155 Adam (biblical person) IX/26 Abbott, George VI/130 Adams,
    [Show full text]