Mortality Investigation of the Mekong Irrawaddy River Dolphin (Orcaella Brevirostris) in Cambodia Based on Necropsy Sample Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mortality Investigation of the Mekong Irrawaddy River Dolphin (Orcaella Brevirostris) in Cambodia Based on Necropsy Sample Analysis MORTALITY INVESTIGATION OF THE MEKONG IRRAWADDY RIVER DOLPHIN (ORCAELLA BREVIROSTRIS) IN CAMBODIA BASED ON NECROPSY SAMPLE ANALYSIS Dr Verné Dove (BVSc hons BAnim SC hons MVS cons med. Dip Cons) WWF Technical Report April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.........................................................................................................3 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...........................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (KHMER) .........................................................................5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (ENGLISH).............................................................12 2. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................18 3. METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................20 3.1. Necropsies.........................................................................................................20 3.2. Epidemiology in disease surveillance...............................................................20 3.3. Sample analysis.................................................................................................21 4. RESULTS ............................................................................................................24 4.1. Microbiological Testing at Pasteur Institute.....................................................24 4.2. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Pathogen Screen .......................................25 4.3. Histopathology..................................................................................................25 4.4. Heavy Metal Analysis.......................................................................................26 4.5. Dioxin Analysis ................................................................................................27 4.6. Persistent Organochlorine Pesticides (POPs) ...................................................28 4.7. Genetic analysis ................................................................................................30 DISCUSSION..............................................................................................................31 4.8. Neck Lesions and Pathogen Screening.............................................................34 4.8.1. Aeromonas hydrophila..............................................................................36 4.9. Histopathology Findings...................................................................................38 4.10. Heavy Metal Analysis.....................................................................................39 4.11. Dioxin Analysis ..............................................................................................41 4.12. Persistent Organochlorine Pesticides (POPs) Analysis ..................................42 4.13. Genetic Analysis .............................................................................................45 4.14. Contaminants, Disease and Immunosuppression............................................45 4.15. Threats Contributing to the Mekong River Dolphin Population Decline.......47 4.15.1. Inbreeding and Contaminants Resulting in Immuno-suppression and Disease.................................................................................................................47 5. CONCLUSION....................................................................................................52 6. RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................................53 7. GLOSSARY ........................................................................................................54 8. REFERENCES ....................................................................................................57 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Details of the tissues exported in 2006..........................................................22 Table 2: Tests carried out on each sample...................................................................23 Table 3: Bacterial Culture Results from Pasteur Institute Phnom Penh. .....................24 Table 4: Irrawaddy Dolphin Sample Pathogen screen.................................................25 Table 5: Mercury and Selenium results from the Irrawaddy dolphin in µmol/g-wet weight...................................................................................................................26 Table 6: Mercury and Selenium results from the Irrawaddy dolphin in µg/g-wet weight...................................................................................................................27 Table 7: Average results for 5 dolphins sampled for Dioxins and Furans...................28 Table 8: Total lipid and lipid classesa in blubber of Irrawaddy dolphins collected in Cambodia 2004-2006...........................................................................................29 Table 9: Concentrations (ng/g, Lipid) of POPs measured in blubber of Irrawaddy dolphins collected in Cambodia 2004-2006 ........................................................29 Table 10: Mean concentrations (ng/g, Lipid) of Organochlorine contaminants measured in blubber of Irrawaddy dolphins collected in Chilika Lake, India, 2000-2001 ............................................................................................................30 Table 11: Comparison of various mercury levels........................................................39 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Some of the 8 dead dolphins that were buried under instruction in 2007....32 Figure 2: Some of the dolphins withheld from necropsy examination for up to one month ...................................................................................................................33 Figure 3: Neck lesions visible to the naked eye commonly seen in dead dolphins.....34 Figure 4: Difference in muscle colour of neck lesion area compared to the rest of the body......................................................................................................................35 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge my supervisors in this project, Dr Carly Palmer, Dr Kristin Warren, Dr Martin Gilbert and Dr Ian Roberts for all their help and support. I would like to thank and acknowledge the research team, with out which this project could not be done, Dr Fernando Trujillo, Lor Kim San, Kim Sokha, Vinn Bunna, Tan Someth Bunvath, Bart Kluskens, Phay Somany, David Dove, Mr Vuth, Mr Lipine, Troy Saville, Gerard Ryan and Laura Parker, as well as Richard Zanre the project manager of CMDCP (Cambodian Mekong Dolphin Conservation Project). In addition, I would like to extend my gratitude to the Cambodian Fisheries Administration and Commission for Dolphin Conservation and Ecotourism Development for their ongoing support for this project, particularly His Excellency T.S. Tana for supporting this work. In addition I would like to acknowledge WWF-Cambodia and WWF-Denmark for the financial and logistical support for this project, and the WCS- field veterinary program for all the support they have provided to this project. I would also like to acknowledge Murdoch University for providing funding towards equipment needed for this project, and for funding to present a paper on the research findings at an international conference. 4 esckþIsegçb stVepSatk,alRteLakTenøemKgÁ ¬Orcaella brevirostris¦ KWCastVepSatmYyRkum kñúgcMeNamstVepSatTenøcMnYnbIRkumepSgKña EdlRtUv)ancat;fñak;CaRbePTrgeRKaHbMputQan eTArkPaBputBUC. bc©úb,nñ cMnYn)a:n;RbmaNsrubénstVepSatk,alRteLakTenøemKgÁKWsßitenA cenøaHBI 66 eTA 86k,al b:ueNÑaH. cab;BIqñaM 2003 rhUtmkTl;bc©úb,nñenH stVepSatsrub cMnYn 88 k,al)ansøab;. GaRtasøab;d_x<s;enHkMBugeFVI[stVepSatk,alRteLakTenøemKgÁkøay CaRkumstVepSatEdlTTYlrgkarKMramkMEhgxøaMgCageKkñúgcMeNamstVepSatTenøTaMgbIRkum nig kMBugQaneTArkPaBvinasputBUCEtmþg. r)aykarN_enH kt;RtalT§plEdlTTYl)anBIkarviPaKelIsMNakstVepSatsøab;tam ry³karsikSacMnYnBIrdac;edayELkBIKña dUcxageRkam³ karsikSaRbePTTI1 karviPaKedIm,IBinitüemIlRbePT)ak;etrIEdlbgá[manCm¶W RtUv)aneFVIeLIgelIsMNak EdlRbmUl)anBIstVepSatEdlsøab;cMnYn 11k,al cab;taMgBI qñaM2007. karviPaKenH)aneFVI eLIgenAmnÞIrBiesaFn_viC¢asaRsþ)araMgénviTüasßan)a:sÞ½rRkugPñMeBjénRbeTskm<úCa . karsikSaRbePTTI2 sMNakstVepSatcMnYn 21EdlRbmUl)anBIkarvHkat;enAkñúgcenøaHqñaM 2004 nig2006 RtUv )ansRmaMgeRCIserIs nigepJIrecjeTAkan;mnÞIrBiesaFn_enARbeTskaNada nigshrdæGaemrik. sMNakTaMgenaHRtUv)anviPaKrkRbePTeraKsBaØaepSg² dUcxageRkam³ • BinitüemIlRbePT)ak;etrIEdlbgá[stVepSatmanCm¶W . PCR Pathogen (Disease) screening • BinitüemIlbMErbMrYlénCalikaEs,kEdlbgáeLIgedayCm¶W . Histopathology (microscopy) • BinitüemIlCatiKImIBulEdlmanenAkñúgbrisßan . Toxicology (environmental contaminants) • BinitüemIlBIsarFatuelah³ ¬)ar:t nigeseLj:Úm¦ Heavy Metal (Mercury and Selenium) • viPaKemIlCatiBulDIGuksIun (Dioxin/Furan analysis) • viPaKemIlBITMnak;TMngEh‘Sn (Genetic analysis) 5 karsikSaRbePTTI1 lT§plénkarsikSaBIkarviPaKrkemIlRbePT)ak;etrI EdlbgáCm¶Wdl;stVepSat)aneFVI eLIgenAviTüasßan)a:sÞ½rkñúgRkugPñMeBj)ankMnt;BImuxsBaØaénRbePTCm¶W EdlCamUlehtunaM[stV epSat cMnYn10k,al søab;enAkñúgcMeNamsMNakstVepSatsrubcMnYn11EdlRtUv)aneFVIkarviPaK enAmnÞIrBiesaFn_. PaKeRcInénsaksBstVepSatEdlsøab;RbmUl)anPøam KWmansñamenARtg;k emIleTAdUcCasñamCaMRkem:A. enAeBleFVIkarvHkat; eKsegáteXIjfasñamCaMenARtg;kTaMgenH hak;dUcCadMe)ArlYy. )ak;etrImYyRbePTkñúgcMeNam)ak;etrICaeRcInRbePTEdlbgá[mansñam
Recommended publications
  • Damming the Irrawaddy Contact [email protected]
    Damming the Irrawaddy Contact [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank the donors that supported this report project. We thank DCMF and GGF for support to begin the initial research and writing. We thank BRC for their ongoing support, and E-desk and ERI for their technical assistance. Most importantly we would like to say thanks to our staff and field researchers from the KDNG network, including from the Kachin Environmental Organization and All Kachin Students and Youth Union, and other environmental organizations from Burma that gave us suggestions and advice. Kachin Development Networking Group (KDNG) KDNG is a network of Kachin civil society groups and development organizations inside Kachin State and overseas that was set up in 2004. KDNGs purpose is to effectively work for sustainable development together with locally-based organizations in Kachin State. Its aim is to promote a civil society based on equality and justice for the local people in the struggle for social and political change in Burma.KDNG is a network of Kachin civil society groups and development organizations inside Kachin State and overseas that was set up in 2004. KDNGs purpose is to effectively work for sustainable development together with locally-based organizations in Kachin State. Its aim is to promote a civil society based on equality and justice for the local people in the struggle for social and political change in Burma. Kachin Environmental Organization (KEO) is a member of the KDNG and is the main author of this report. Kachin Environmental Organization The Kachin Environmental Organization (KEO) was formed in April 2004 by Kachin people concerned about environment issues inside Kachin State, especially the rapid loss of natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Factors Influencing Group Sizes of River Dolphins (Inia Geoffrensis and Sotalia Fluviatilis)
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, **(*): ***–*** (*** 2011) C 2011 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00496.x Ecological factors influencing group sizes of river dolphins (Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis) CATALINA GOMEZ-SALAZAR Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4J1, Canada and Foundation Omacha, Calle 86A No. 23–38, Bogota, Colombia E-mail: [email protected] FERNANDO TRUJILLO Foundation Omacha, Calle 86A No. 23–38, Bogota, Colombia HAL WHITEHEAD Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4J1, Canada ABSTRACT Living in groups is usually driven by predation and competition for resources. River dolphins do not have natural predators but inhabit dynamic systems with predictable seasonal shifts. These ecological features may provide some insight into the forces driving group formation and help us to answer questions such as why river dolphins have some of the smallest group sizes of cetaceans, and why group sizes vary with time and place. We analyzed observations of group size for Inia and Sotalia over a 9 yr period. In the Amazon, largest group sizes occurred in main rivers and lakes, particularly during the low water season when resources are concentrated; smaller group sizes occurred in constricted waters (channels, tributaries, and confluences) that receive an influx of blackwaters that are poor in nutrients and sediments. In the Orinoco, the largest group sizes occurred during the transitional water season when the aquatic productivity increases. The largest group size of Inia occurred in the Orinoco location that contains the influx of two highly productive whitewater rivers. Flood pulses govern productivity and major biological factors of these river basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Patterns in Marine Mammal Distributions
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TAXONOMIC DECISIONS In this work we followed Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Reeves, Stewart, and Clapham’s (2002) taxonomy. In the last 20 years several new species have been described such as Mesoplodon perrini (Dalebout 2002), Orcaella heinsohni (Beasley 2005), and the recognition of several species have been proposed for orcas (Perrin 1982, Pitman et al. 2007), Bryde's whales (Kanda et al. 2007), Blue whales (Garrigue et al. 2003, Ichihara 1996), Tucuxi dolphin (Cunha et al. 2005, Caballero et al. 2008), and other marine mammals. Since we used the conservation status of all species following IUCN (2011), this work is based on species recognized by this IUCN to keep a standardized baseline. II. SPECIES LIST List of the species included in this paper, indicating their conservation status according to IUCN (2010.4) and its range area. Order Family Species IUCN 2010 Freshwater Range area km2 Enhydra lutris EN A2abe 1,084,750,000,000 Mustelidae Lontra felina EN A3cd 996,197,000,000 Odobenidae Odobenus rosmarus DD 5,367,060,000,000 Arctocephalus australis LC 1,674,290,000,000 Arctocephalus forsteri LC 1,823,240,000,000 Arctocephalus galapagoensis EN A2a 167,512,000,000 Arctocephalus gazella LC 39,155,300,000,000 Arctocephalus philippii NT 163,932,000,000 Arctocephalus pusillus LC 1,705,430,000,000 Arctocephalus townsendi NT 1,045,950,000,000 Carnivora Otariidae Arctocephalus tropicalis LC 39,249,100,000,000 Callorhinus ursinus VU A2b 12,935,900,000,000 Eumetopias jubatus EN A2a 3,051,310,000,000 Neophoca cinerea
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS and CONSERVATION of FRESHWATER POPULATIONS of IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D
    WORKING PAPER NO. 31 MAY 2007 STATUS AND CONSERVATION OF FRESHWATER POPULATIONS OF IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D. Smith, Robert G. Shore and Alvin Lopez WORKING PAPER NO. 31 MAY 2007 sTATUS AND CONSERVATION OF FRESHWATER POPULATIONS OF IRRAWADDY DOLPHINS Edited by Brian D. Smith, Robert G. Shore and Alvin Lopez WCS Working Papers: ISSN 1530-4426 Copies of the WCS Working Papers are available at http://www.wcs.org/science Cover photographs by: Isabel Beasley (top, Mekong), Danielle Kreb (middle, Mahakam), Brian D. Smith (bottom, Ayeyarwady) Copyright: The contents of this paper are the sole property of the authors and cannot be reproduced without permission of the authors. The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) saves wildlife and wild lands around the world. We do this through science, conservation, education, and the man- agement of the world's largest system of urban wildlife parks, led by the flag- ship Bronx Zoo. Together, these activities inspire people to imagine wildlife and humans living together sustainably. WCS believes that this work is essential to the integrity of life on earth. Over the past century, WCS has grown and diversified to include four zoos, an aquarium, over 100 field conservation projects, local and international educa- tion programs, and a wildlife health program. To amplify this dispersed con- servation knowledge, the WCS Institute was established as an internal “think tank” to coordinate WCS expertise for specific conservation opportunities and to analyze conservation and academic trends that provide opportunities to fur- ther conservation effectiveness. The Institute disseminates WCS' conservation work via papers and workshops, adding value to WCS' discoveries and experi- ence by sharing them with partner organizations, policy-makers, and the pub- lic.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status and the Use of Irrawaddy Dolphins As a Flagship
    Conservation status and the use of Irrawaddy dolphins as a flagship species for climate adaptation in the Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia Building Resilience to Climate Change Impacts in Coastal Southeast Asia (BCR) Brian Smith, Sun Kong and Lieng Saroeun INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE The designation of geographical entities in this Citation: Smith, B., Kong, S., and Saroeun, L. book, and the presentation of the material, do not (2014). Conservation status and the use of imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on Irrawaddy dolphins as a flagship species for climate adaptation in the Peam Krasop Wildlife the part of IUCN or the European Union concerning Sanctuary, Cambodia. Thailand: IUCN. 80pp. the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its Cover photo: Dolphins in Koh Kong Province, frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this Cambodia © IUCN Cambodia/Sun Kong publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, the European Union or any other participating Layout by: Ria Sen organizations. Produced by: IUCN Southeast Asia Group This publication has been made possible by funding from the European Union. Available from: IUCN Asia Regional Office Published by: IUCN Asia in Bangkok, Thailand 63 Soi Prompong, Sukhumvit 39, Wattana 10110 Bangkok, Thailand Copyright: © 2014 IUCN, International Union for Tel: +66 2 662 4029 Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources IUCN Cambodia Reproduction of this publication for educational or #6B, St. 368, Boeng Keng Kang III, other non-commercial purposes is authorized Chamkarmon, PO Box 1504, Phnom Penh, without prior written permission from the copyright Cambodia holder provided the source is fully acknowledgeRia d.
    [Show full text]
  • Whale Watching New South Wales Australia
    Whale Watching New South Wales Australia Including • About Whales • Humpback Whales • Whale Migration • Southern Right Whales • Whale Life Cycle • Blue Whales • Whales in Sydney Harbour • Minke Whales • Aboriginal People & Whales • Dolphins • Typical Whale Behaviour • Orcas • Whale Species • Other Whale Species • Whales in Australia • Other Marine Species About Whales The whale species you are most likely to see along the New South Wales Coastline are • Humpback Whale • Southern Right Whale Throughout June and July Humpback Whales head north for breading before return south with their calves from September to November. Other whale species you may see include: • Minke Whale • Blue Whale • Sei Whale • Fin Whale • False Killer Whale • Orca or Killer Whale • Sperm Whale • Pygmy Right Whale • Pygmy Sperm Whale • Bryde’s Whale Oceans cover about 70% of the Earth’s surface and this vast environment is home to some of the Earth’s most fascinating creatures: whales. Whales are complex, often highly social and intelligent creatures. They are mammals like us. They breath air, have hair on their bodies (though only very little), give birth to live young and suckle their calves through mammary glands. But unlike us, whales are perfectly adapted to the marine environment with strong, muscular and streamlined bodies insulated by thick layers of blubber to keep them warm. Whales are gentle animals that have graced the planet for over 50 million years and are present in all oceans of the world. They capture our imagination like few other animals. The largest species of whales were hunted almost to extinction in the last few hundred years and have survived only thanks to conservation and protection efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Translocation of Trapped Bolivian River Dolphins (Inia Boliviensis)
    J. CETACEAN RES. MANAGE. 21: 17–23, 2020 17 Translocation of trapped Bolivian river dolphins (Inia boliviensis) ENZO ALIAGA-ROSSEL1,3AND MARIANA ESCOBAR-WW2 Contact e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Bolivian river dolphin, locally known as the bufeo, is the only cetacean in land-locked Bolivia. Knowledge about its conservation status and vulnerability to anthropogenic actions is extremely deficient. We report on the rescue and translocation of 26 Bolivian river dolphins trapped in a shrinking segment of the Pailas River, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Several institutions, authorities and volunteers collaborated to translocate the dolphins, which included calves, juveniles, and pregnant females. The dolphins were successfully released into the Río Grande. Each dolphin was accompanied by biologists who assured their welfare. No detectable injuries occurred and none of the dolphins died during this process. If habitat degradation continues, it is likely that events in which river dolphins become trapped in South America may happen more frequently in the future. KEYWORDS: BOLIVIAN RIVER DOLPHIN; HABITAT DEGRADATION; CONSERVATION; STRANDINGS; TRANSLOCATION; SOUTH AMERICA INTRODUCTION distinct species, geographically isolated from the boto or Small cetaceans are facing several threats from direct or Amazon River dolphin (I. geoffrensis) (Gravena et al., 2014; indirect human impacts (Reeves et al., 2000). The pressure Ruiz-Garcia et al., 2008). This species has been categorised on South American and Asian river dolphins is increasing; by the Red Book of Wildlife Vertebrates of Bolivia as evidently, different river systems have very different problems. Vulnerable (VU), highlighting the need to conserve and Habitat degradation, dam construction, modification of river protect them from existing threats (Aguirre et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Myitsone Hydroelectric Dam Myanmar
    Myitsone hydroelectric dam Myanmar Sectors: Hydroelectric Power Generation On record This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: Oct 12 2016 Contact: Project website Sectors Hydroelectric Power Generation Location About Myitsone hydroelectric dam The Myitsone Hydroelectric Project is the largest of seven dams (total capacity 13,360MW) planned on the headwaters of the Irrawaddy (confluence of Mali Hka, and N’Mai Hka rivers) in Burma. The USD$3.6 billion project is located in an area recognized as one of the world’s eight hotspots of biodiversity, and will submerge “the birthplace of Burma” in local myths, including a number of historical churches and temples, and the sacred banyan tree. There are serious doubts about the quality and independence of the Environmental Impact Assessment for this mega-dam project, as well as concerns regarding the resettlement process and the role of the project in exacerbating the long-standing conflict between the ethnic Kachin people and the military government. Latest developments Project Status Apr 19 2012 What must happen The project must be cancelled because of the local opposition and continued fighting caused by the project in Kachin State. There must be an independent and comprehensive investigation of the environmental and social impacts including downstream impacts, of the remaining 6 dams planned on the headwaters of the Irrawaddy River. Impacts Social and human rights impacts Thousands of people’s livelihoods are directly impacted by the Myitsone project. The government has underreported the number of people directly affected by the dam as few as 2146 people from five villages will be relocated to new homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammal Collections in Australia
    Proceedings of the 7th and 8th Symposia on Collection Building and Natural History Studies in Asia and the Pacific Rim, edited by Y. Tomida et al., National Science Museum Monographs, (34): 117–126, 2006. Marine Mammal Collections in Australia Tadasu K. Yamada1, Catherine Kemper2, Yuko Tajima3, Ayako Umetani4, Heather Janetzki5 and David Pemberton6 1 Department of Zoology, National Science Museum (e-mail: [email protected]) 2 Vertebrates Department, South Australian Museum (e-mail: [email protected]) 3 Univeristy of Texas, Medical Branch (e-mail: [email protected]) 4 Graduate School of Veterinary Science, Azabu University (e-mail: [email protected]) 5 Section of Vertebrates, Queensland Museum (e-mail: [email protected]) 6 Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (e-mail: [email protected]) with assistance in compiling museum collections from: Wayne Longmore, National Museum of Victoria Sandy Ingleby, Australian Museum Norah Cooper, Western Australian Museum Brian Smith, Queen Victoria Museum Gavin Dally, Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory Robert Palmer, National Wildlife Collection (CSIRO) Abstract Museums in Australia house over 5500 marine mammal specimens in nine major institu- tions. These collections are here summarized with a view to making them more accessible to re- searchers throughout the world. Fifty-eight species of marine mammal are known from Australian waters. These and many more from elsewhere are represented in the collections. Australian museums are an important source of material for wide-ranging studies on marine mammals, including refining the taxonomy of difficult and cosmopolitan genera such as Tursiops and Delphinus, and species such as beaked whales that are rare in world collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Snubfin Dolphin ©
    Species Fact Sheet: Snubfin dolphin © G u i d o J . P a r r a Snubfin Dolphin Orcaella heinsohni In 2005 a new species of dolphin was found in Australian waters, the Australian snubfin dolphin. The discovery of a new mammal is extremely rare. Until recently the snubfin dolphin was thought to be an Irrawaddy dolphin, which is found in coastal areas and major rivers of south-east Asia, and is in serious decline. The snubfin dolphin is Australia’s only endemic dolphin, meaning it is unique to northern Australia. Coastal and river dolphins are among the most threatened species of mammal in the world. Snubfin dolphins, like all dolphin species, are toothed cetaceans and therefore have one blow hole and are generally smaller in size compared with the baleen cetaceans like the humpback whale. © G u i d o J . P a r r a Conservation status The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Redlist of Threatened Species: Data deficient Australian Government - Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Data deficient Did you know? Conservation action • Snubfin dolphins were named after George Because so little is known about Australia’s coastal Heinsohn, an Australian biologist who worked at dolphins, research is essential in order to identify important James Cook University in the 1960s and 1970s - habitat, collect baseline information and determine if the Orcaella heinsohni. different populations are related to each other. • Snubfin dolphins are cetaceans, like whales, and Using boat-based surveys, photo-identification and tissue have a blow hole, which is the equivalent to a sampling methods, vital information will be gathered about human nostril that they breathe through.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Flows for the Ayeyarwady (Irrawaddy) River Basin, Myanmar
    UNESCO-IHE Online Course on Environmental Flows Environmental Flows for the Ayeyarwady (Irrawaddy) River Basin, Myanmar Written by Alison Simmance MSc BSc April. 2013 E:[email protected] Environmental Flows for the Ayeyarwady River Basin, A.Simmance Environmental Flows for the Ayeyarwady (Irrawaddy) River Basin, Myanmar UNESCO-IHE Online Course on Environmental Flows Citation: Simmance, A. 2013. Environmental Flows for the Ayeyarwady (Irrawaddy) River Basin, Myanmar. Unpublished. UNESCO-IHE Online Course on Environmental Flows. Environmental Flows for the Ayeyarwady River Basin, A.Simmance Table of Contents 1. Chapter 1: Introduction to the Ayeyarwady River Basin 2 1.1. Overview- Country Context 2 1.2. Introduction to the Ayeyarwady River Basin 4 1.2.1. Hydrological Characteristics of the Ayeyarwady River Basin 4 1.2.2. Climate 5 1.3. The Ayeyarwady River Basin’s Natural Resources 6 1.3.1. Biodiversity and Conservation 6 1.3.2. Habitats 9 1.3.3. Watersheds and Freshwater Resources 10 1.3.4. Oil and Gas 11 1.3.5. Minerals 11 1.4. Socio-economic Conditions of the Ayeyarwady River Basin 11 1.5. Problems and Issues in the Ayeyarwady River Basin 12 1.5.1. Irrigation and drainage development 13 1.5.2. Hydropower Developments 13 1.5.3. Land-use change and Deforestation 15 1.5.4. Oil and Gas Extraction 16 1.5.5. Mining 16 1.5.6. Climate Change 17 1.5.7. Unsustainable Fishing Practices 18 1.5.8. Biodiversity Loss 18 1.5.9. Conclusions 18 2. Chapter 2: Governance of Natural Resource Management in the Ayeyarwady River Basin 19 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure2 Taxonomic Revision of the Dolphin Genus Lagenorhynchus
    A) LeDuc et al. 1999, Figure 1 - cyt b (1,140 bp) B) May-Collado & Agnarsson 2006, Figure 2 - cyt b (578 or 1,140 bp) C) Agnarsson & May-Collado 2008, Figure 5 - cyt b (578 or 1,140 bp) 100/100/34 100 100/100 Phocoena spp. Phocoenidae Phocoenidae 65/92 100/100/23 85 Monodontidae 100/100 Feresa attenuata 100 Monodontidae Monodontidae 58/79/1 94/92 Peponocephala electra Orcaella brevirostris 98/99/6 100 Cephalorhynchus commersonii Orcinus orca Globicephala spp. 97/97/9 98 Cephalorhynchus eutropia 100/100 Globicephala spp. Grampus griseus 51/57 80 Cephalorhynchus hectori 55/69 Peponocephala electra Pseudorca crassidens Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 100/100 58/77 Feresa attenuata Orcinus orca 100/100 96 Lagenorhynchus australis Grampus griseus 98/89/9 Orcaella sp. Lagenorhynchus cruciger Pseudorca crassidens 100 99 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens 100/100/13 Lissodelphis borealis 100/100 Cephalorhynchus commersonii Lissodelphis peronii Lagenorhynchus obscurus 99/99 Cephalorhynchus eutropia 56/69/1 Lagenorhynchus obscurus 100 Lissodelphis borealis 73/78 Cephalorhynchus hectori Lagenorhynchus obliquidens Lissodelphis peronii 64/62 Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 100/100/9 100/99/8 Lagenorhynchus cruciger 100 27/X 100/100 Lagenorhynchus australis Delphinus sp. 95/96 Lagenorhynchus australis Lagenorhynchus cruciger 98/99/12 99 Cephalorhynchus heavisidii 59 95 Stenella clymene 100/100 100/100 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens 63/57/ Lagenorhynchus obscurus 2 Cephalorhynchus hectori 100 Stenella coeruleoalba Cephalorhynchus eutropia Stenella frontalis 100/100 Lissodelphis borealis 98/99/5 Cephalorhynchus commersonii 57 Tursiops truncatus Lissodelphis peronii Lagenodelphis hosei Lagenorhynchus albirostris 100/100 100 Sousa chinensis Delphinus sp. Lagenorhynchus acutus 77/77 * Stenella attenuata 99/99 Stenella clymene Steno bredanensis 69 93/89 * Stenella longirostris Stenella coeruleoalba 37/X 99/99 Sotalia fluviatilis 68 51 Sotalia fluviatilis 100 100/100 Stenella frontalis Steno bredanensis Sousa chinensis 43/88 Tursiops aduncus 76/78/2 Lagenorhynchus acutus Tursiops truncatus Stenella spp.
    [Show full text]