776 69,3% 326 77% 453,3Cad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Component 1000 DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE INSTRUMENTS STRATEGIC ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNING SERVICES Assessment of the quality 776 439 337 of administrative services 660 781 points* points* community, businessness 16 and CNAP’s operations and government implementationimp representatives monitoringm involved systems 2017 2018 326 recommendations * з 1000 можливих 16 provided LOCAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES 16 77% recommendations implemented eco-screeningse 16 and SEAs implementationntation plansns 16 DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE gender analyses AND DEVELOPMENT 69,3% INITIATIVES SUPPORT FUND relevant tasks implemented Amount of co-funding Partner cities PLEDDG Practical Guide CAD CAD "Local Economic Development: 453,3 thou. 317 thou. Funding Models, Resources, and Instruments" 18 PROJECTS 1 1 5 THEMES Marketing and tourism 6 Administrative services Open governance 5 Environmental sustainability Investment attraction MARKETING STRATEGIES AND BRANDING OF CITIES GENDER-RESPONSIVE 11 marketing strategies 6 brand visualizations BUDGETING Vinnytsia, Melitopol, Vinnytsia, Yaremche, Enerhodar, Ivano-Frankivsk, 10 cities 16 gender-sensitive Ivano-Frankivsk, Kolomyia, Enerhodar, Melitopol, Myrhorod, Khmilnyk, Yaremche, Khmilnyk are implementing programs Berdyansk, Poltava, Horishni Plavni in the fields of education; cultuure; physicall trainraining and sports; social security; SME developmement KEY DELIVERABLES 2015-2021 Component 1000 DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE INSTRUMENTS OPEN GOVERNANCE PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING In16 partner cities: 15 cities are implementing 3 cities are implementing school participatory Local governments decisions 154 1 implemented at the budgeting regulate local democracy issues level of Poltava Oblast Vinnytsia, Kremenchuk, Ivano-Frankivsk Local democracy instruments 221 are being implemented Amount of funding UAH229,8 million City Democracy Index 2019 17,3 31,5 36,9 62,5 81,6 Highest level of democracy: Khmilnyk, Vinnytsia, Ivano-Frankivsk 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Local Budget Transparency Voted for projects 636 809 persons Index 2018, 2019 Winning projects 958 Implemented projects 661 Highest level of transparency: Vinnytsia, Khmilnyk, Kremenchuk Case Study “Implementation and Improvement 383 recommendations given of Participatory Budgeting: 43,9% of recommendations implemented Experiences of Ukrainian Cities and Recommendations” LOCAL GOVERNMENTS COMMUNICATIONS 11 cities adopted communications strategies or plans Vinnytsia, Khmilnyk, Ivano-Frankivsk, Kolomyia, Berdyansk, Myrhorod, Yaremche, Enerhodar, Melitopol, Horishni Plavni, Poltava ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM System implemented by 16 cities Ptactical Guide “Community Trust: Number of auctions 1490 Local Governments Crisis Communications” Income from selling UAH 139,7million communal property data as of February 1, 2021 as a ruunningun total (the system has been operatingg sinces late 2017) KEY DELIVERABLES 2015-2021.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
English Version ITLOS/PV.19/C26/1/Rev.1 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA 2019 Friday, 10 May 2019, at 10 a.m., at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Hamburg, President Jin-Hyun Paik presiding CASE CONCERNING THE DETENTION OF THREE UKRAINIAN NAVAL VESSELS (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) Verbatim Record Present: President Jin-Hyun Paik Vice-President David Attard Judges José Luís Jesus Jean-Pierre Cot Anthony Amos Lucky Stanislaw Pawlak Shunji Yanai James L. Kateka Albert J. Hoffmann Zhiguo Gao Boualem Bouguetaia Elsa Kelly Markiyan Kulyk Alonso Gómez-Robledo Tomas Heidar Óscar Cabello Sarubbi Neeru Chadha Kriangsak Kittichaisaree Roman Kolodkin Liesbeth Lijnzaad Registrar Philippe Gautier ITLOS/PV.19/C26/1/Rev.1 ii 10/05/2019 a.m. Ukraine is represented by: H.E. Olena Zerkal, Deputy Foreign Minister, as Agent; and Ms Marney L. Cheek, Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia; Covington & Burling LLP, Mr Jonathan Gimblett, Member of the Bar of Virginia and the District of Columbia; Covington & Burling LLP, Professor Alfred H.A. Soons, Utrecht University School of Law; Associate Member of the Institute of International Law, Professor Jean-Marc Thouvenin, University Paris Nanterre; Secretary General of the Hague Academy of International Law; Member of the Paris Bar; Sygna Partners, as Counsel and Advocates; Ms Oksana Zolotaryova, Director, International Law Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Colonel Leonid Zaliubovskyi, Colonel of Justice, Naval Forces of Ukraine, Mr Nikhil V. Gore, Covington & Burling
[Show full text]
Ukrainian and Russian Waterways and the Development of European Transport Corridors
European Transport \ Trasporti Europei n. 30 (2005): 14-36 Ukrainian and Russian waterways and the development of European transport corridors Michael Doubrovsky1∗ 1Odessa National Maritime University, Odessa, Ukraine Abstract Four of the nine international transport corridors pass through the territory of Ukraine: №3, №5, №7, and №9. In recent years Ukraine conducted an active policy supporting the European initiatives on the international transport corridors and offered variants of corridors to the European community. In the field of a water transport it is planned to carry out the construction of new and reconstruction of existing infrastructure (regarding corridors № 9; TRACECA; Baltic - Black Sea) in the main Ukrainian ports. The paper considers the situation in the Ukrainian waterways as a part of the international transport corridors. It presents an analysis of the existing situation and some planning measures. In order to optimize and rationally development the inland waterways and seaports of the Black Sea – Azov Sea region it is necessary to speed up the working out and official approval of the regional transport ways network. Regarding Ukrainian seaports this task is carried out within the framework of program TRACECA, and also by Steering Committee of Black Sea PETRA and working group on transport of the Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation. To connect the new members countries of EU two approaches are considered: (1) the use of the Danube River due to restoration of navigation in its Ukrainian part, providing an exit to the Black Sea; (2) the creation of new inland water-transport links providing a more rational and uniform distribution of freight traffics from the Central and Northern Europe (using the third largest river in Europe - Dnepr River running into the Black Sea).
[Show full text]
STATEMENT by MR. ALEXANDER LUKASHEVICH, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION, at the 1209Th MEETING of the OSCE PERMANENT COUNCIL
PC.DEL/1544/18 14 December 2018 ENGLISH Original: RUSSIAN Delegation of the Russian Federation STATEMENT BY MR. ALEXANDER LUKASHEVICH, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, AT THE 1209th MEETING OF THE OSCE PERMANENT COUNCIL 13 December 2018 More on Ukraine’s military provocation in the Black Sea Mr. Chairperson, Over the past two weeks, we have heard many unfounded accusations against Russia in connection with the actions of Russian border guards in the Black Sea on 25 November in response to the provocation by the Ukrainian navy. Using these events as a pretext, the Ukrainian delegation frustrated the adoption at the Ministerial Council meeting in Milan of a document on the settlement of the internal Ukrainian crisis and a political declaration. The situation surrounding this recent incident requires a detailed analysis. We shall therefore set out in detail the chronology of events so that no one is left with any doubt as to the provocative nature of the Ukrainian navy’s actions. I might add that they posed a danger to the countless non-military vessels that were present at that time in the waters of the Kerch Strait. In parallel, we shall show you some slides indicating where and how this happened. So, at 11.37 hours on 24 November, the Russian State Border Service reported the movement of four Ukrainian navy ships in the Black Sea heading towards the Russian coast: two support vessels and two gunboats. At 16.40, two Ukrainian navy ships, the Horlivka support vessel and the Yany Kapu ocean-going tugboat, were identified in Russia’s exclusive economic zone 20 nautical miles from the border.
[Show full text]
Unfpa Ukraine Gbv Programme Newsletter June' 20
UNFPA UKRAINE GBV PROGRAMME NEWSLETTER JUNE’ 20 INCREASED NUMBER OF GBV SURVIVORS SEEKING HELP DURING COVID-19 OUTBREAK “CLIENTS MORE OFTEN (c) unsplash.comPhoto: unsplash.com SUFFER FROM OVERLAPPING Upon introduction of travel restrictive Specialists of UNFPA-supported daycare centres VULNERABILITIES: MANY OF measures as part of COVID-19 response on observe a similar trend. In the ﬁrst month of quarantine, 15 March, six mobile teams of psychosocial 5 daycare centres provided assistance to 49% more THEM LOST THEIR INCOME- support to ATO/JFO veterans and their clients compared to the pre-quarantine month. In families supported by UNFPA adjusted their the second month after the introduction of restrictive GENERATING OPPORTUNITIES operation. Standing ready to make urgent measures, specialists of daycare centres observed DUE TO COVID-19 visits within their service area in Mykolaiv a further 36% increase in the number of GBV survivors and Kyiv regions, mobile teams’ sta started seeking help, compared to ﬁrst month of the OUTBREAK” providing consultations via phone, Skype quarantine, or 67% growth compared to the month and messengers. Oering their support to prior the COVID-19 outbreak. Specialist of PSS mobile teams everyone in need nationwide, psychologists Operators of the national hotline for GBV survivors for ATO/JFO veterans have been weekly addressing a seven-fold (managed by La Strada with UNFPA support) also volume of GBV cases compared to the register a notable increase in the number of pre-quarantine period. The increase is requests for assistance. Overall, a month after the largely due to shift in modality – if prior to introduction of quarantine saw a 23% growth in the quarantine, MTs were giving around 100 number of calls compared to the pre-quarantine in-person consultations per week, they month.
[Show full text]
Summary Executive
Comprehensive analysis EXECUTIVE of regional labour market and review of the State Employment Service activity in Zaporizhzhia SUMMARY Oblast Oksana Nezhyvenko PhD in Economics Individual Consultant EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - 2020 3 This executive summary is the result of the study of the labour market of Zaporizhzhia Oblast and the activities of the State Employment Service in Zaporizhzhia Oblast held during January-May 2020. The study was conducted within the United Nations Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme, which operates in six oblasts of Ukraine: Donetsk, Luhansk, Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv; the Rule of Law Prog- ram operates in Zhytomyr Oblast. This study was conducted within the framework of Economic Recovery and Restoration of Critical Infrastructure Component. FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES WERE CARRIED OUT AS PART OF THIS STUDY: — statistical data analysed to conduct comprehensive analysis of the labour market dynamics of Zaporizhzhia Oblast; — review of the Zaporizhzhia Oblast Employment Centre activities provided in terms of services and types of benefits it ensures to the unemployed and employers in the Oblast; — interviews with representatives of the Zaporizhzhia Oblast Employment Centre and employers of Zaporizhzhia Oblast on the local labour market conducted, description of these interviews provided; — survey of employers of Zaporizhzhia Oblast was conducted and responses were analysed; — forecast of the Zaporizhzhia Oblast labour market demand carried out. Executive summary is structured in accordance with the above points. The author of the study expresses her gratitude to the representatives of the State Employment Service, the Zaporizhzhia Oblast Employment Centre, district and city-district branches of the Zaporizhzhia Oblast Employment Centre, employers and experts who helped to collect the necessary information and complete the full pic- ture of the labour market of Zaporizhzhia Oblast to deliver it to the reader of this executive summary.
[Show full text]
Kyiv Kyiv Lviv Lviv ... Kyiv Kyiv Sumy ... Kyiv Zaporizhia Ternopil Kyiv
Rank University Town 1 National Technical University of Ukraine Kyiv Polytechnic Institute Kyiv 2 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Kyiv 3 Ivan Franko National University of Lviv Lviv 4 Lviv Polytechnic National University Lviv ... 5 Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Kyiv 6 National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Kyiv 7 Sumy State University Sumy ... 8 National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine Kyiv 9 Zaporizhzhya National University Zaporizhia 10 Ternopil State Medical University Ternopil 11 National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Kyiv 12 O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv Kharkiv ... 13 V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Simferopol 14 National Mining University Dnipro ... 15 V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Kharkiv 16 Vinnytsia National Technical University Vinnytsia 17 National University of Pharmacy Kharkiv 18 National Aviation University Kyiv ... 19 Odessa National University Odesa ... 20 Melitopol State Pedagogical University Melitopol 21 National University of Food Technologies Kyiv 22 Uman State Pedagogical University Uman 23 National Technical University Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute Kharkiv ... 24 Ternopil National Economic University Ternopil 25 Tavria State Agrotechnological University Melitopol 26 Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Kharkiv 27 Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University Kremenchuk 28 Bukovinian State Medical University Chernivtsi 29 National University of Ostroh Academy Ostroh 30 Dnipropetrovsk National University
[Show full text]
Case Study “Implementation and Improvement of Participatory
Case Study IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING Experiences of Ukrainian Cities and Recommendations The international technical assistance project “Partnership for Local Economic Development and Democratic Governance” (PLEDDG) implemented from April 2015 to December 2020 by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, with the financial support of the Ministry of Global Affairs Canada, aimed to strengthen the municipal sector, ensure effective democratic governance, and accelerate the economic development of cities in Ukraine. This publication recounts the experiences of PLEDDG in the field of participatory budgeting, based on the examples of five cities and one region of Ukraine. We invite you to familiarize yourself not only with the best practices and recommendations for the implementation of participatory budgeting and the involvement of residents in the decision- making process in communities, but also with the obstacles that often arise when introducing new participation tools. Currently, PLEDDG is partnered with 15 cities to facilitate public budgeting: Vinnytsia, Zhmerynka, Khmilnyk, Ivano-Frankivsk, Dolyna, Kolomyia, Poltava, Myrhorod, Kremenchuk, Horishni Plavni, Zaporizhia, Enerhodar, Melitopol, and Berdyansk. This tool of participatory democracy enables all citizens, without exception, to participate in the distribution of local budget funds through the creation of projects to address issues of local importance and/or by voting for said projects. The inclusion of participatory budgeting contributes both to
[Show full text]
Kerch Strait En Route to the Ukrainian Port of Berdyansk, on the Sea of Azov, According to Official Ukrainian and Russian Reports (See Figure 1)
CRS INSIGHT Russia's Use of Force Against the Ukrainian Navy December 3, 2018 (IN11004) | Related Author Cory Welt | Cory Welt, Analyst in European Affairs ([email protected], 7-0530) Naval Incident Escalates Tensions On November 25, 2018, Russian coast guard vessels in the Black Sea forcibly prevented two small Ukrainian armored artillery boats and a tugboat from transiting the Kerch Strait en route to the Ukrainian port of Berdyansk, on the Sea of Azov, according to official Ukrainian and Russian reports (see Figure 1). After ramming the tugboat and blockading all three boats for hours, the Russian vessels reportedly fired on them as they sought to leave the area, injuring six sailors. The Ukrainian boats and their 24 crew members were detained and taken to Kerch, in the Russian-occupied Ukrainian region of Crimea. The sailors were arrested and placed in pretrial detention on charges of illegally crossing what Russia refers to as its state border (i.e., the territorial waters around occupied Crimea). Observers generally viewed the incident as a major escalation of tensions between Russia and Ukraine. Russia Tightens Control In May 2018, Russian President Vladimir Putin opened a new 12-mile-long bridge linking Russia to Crimea over the Kerch Strait, the waterway connecting the Black Sea to the Sea of Azov. The bridge was designed to accommodate an existing shipping lane, but it imposes new limits on the size of ships that transit the strait. Observers note that since the bridge's opening, Russia has stepped up its interference with commercial traffic traveling to and from Ukrainian ports in Mariupol and Berdyansk, which export steel, grain, and coal.
[Show full text]
DRC Legal Alert Issue 48
DRC-DDG LEGAL ALERT: Issue 48 January 2020 1. Parliament Adopts Law On Free Meals for IDP Children On 16 January 2020, the Parliament adopted Law No. 474-IX coming in force on 20 May 2020 and entitling IDP children1 to free meals. Free meals have already been available for orphans, children deprived of parental care, children from low-income families, and differently-abled children. Scope of the assistance: parents of IDP children will be provided with free baby food until a child reaches 3 years of age; free meals will be made available for IDP children at schools, and vocational schools. Free meals have to be funded by local authorities who also define the size of a budget per child for a free meal. In 2019, daily budget for free meals per pupil of 1-4 grades was as follows: Cherkasy – 10 UAH, Berdyansk – 10.2 UAH, Kharkiv – 14 UAH, Zhytomyr – 18.3 UAH, Dnipro – 19 UAH. The law, despite its positive intent, may cause unintended negative consequences as it creates scope for inscribing an IDP label on a child and stigmatising his factual situation. Related concerns: Rooting the IDP identity: The fact of being an IDP is not considered as a legal status, as restated by the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. Rather, the internal displacement of a person reflects a factual situation of an IDP, who is entitled to the same rights as other citizens.2 Any effort to create a separate legal identity for an IDP is against the spirit of IDPs rights under international law.
[Show full text]
2021 Half Year Results
4 August 2021 Ferrexpo plc (“Ferrexpo”, the “Group” or the “Company”) Interim Results for the six months ended 30 June 2021 Investment in high grade pellets enables strong financial performance, with further growth ahead Financial Highlights Revenues rise by 74% to US$1,353 million, reflecting market conditions and investments in increasing pellet quality. Underlying EBITDAA increases by 147% to US$868 million (1H 2020: US$352 million). Profit after tax of US$661 million, representing an increase of 165% (1H 2020: US$250 million). Net cashA position of US$213 million (31 December 2020: US$4 million). Capital investment increases to US$142 million (1H 2020: US$96 million). Interim dividend of 39.6 US cents per share (1H 2020: 13.2 US cents per share) in respect of strong performance in 1H 2021. Lucio Genovese, Non-executive Chair, said: “Today’s strong interim financial results reflect our multi-year investment programme in our assets, which has enabled us to not only take full advantage of the current strength of the iron ore market through our high grade iron ore products, but also deliver these results alongside excellent safety performance and continued progress in cutting carbon emissions. The Group has shown resilience throughout the global COVID-19 pandemic, and we remain vigilant in our approach to protect our workforce and local communities from the spread of this virus. We continue to deliver growth, in terms of our operations, marketing and financial results, culminating in underlying EBITDAA of US$868 million for the first half of 2021, an increase of 147%.
[Show full text]
Ukraine: Background, Conflict with Russia, and U.S
Ukraine: Background, Conflict with Russia, and U.S. Policy Cory Welt Specialist in European Affairs Updated April 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R45008 SUMMARY R45008 Ukraine: Background, Conflict with Russia, and April 29, 2020 U.S. Policy Cory Welt In 2019, Ukraine transitioned to a new government under President Volodymyr Zelensky and his Specialist in European Servant of the People party. During Zelensky’s presidency, Ukraine has enacted difficult Affairs economic and governance reforms and renewed talks with Russia on conflict resolution. In [email protected] March 2020, a reshuffling of a six-month-old cabinet that had gained international confidence but lost domestic popularity raised concerns for some. The emergence in Ukraine of Coronavirus For a copy of the full report, Disease 2019 (COVID-19) created further difficulties but also led the government to advance key please call 7-.... or visit reforms necessary to unlock international financial support. www.crs.gov. The United States supports Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders and promotes the implementation of domestic reforms. Since Ukraine’s independence in 1991, and especially after Russia’s 2014 invasion and occupation of Ukrainian territory, Ukraine has been a leading recipient of U.S. foreign and military aid in Europe and Eurasia. Nonmilitary aid averaged about $321 million a year from FY2015 to FY2019, plus a total of almost $240 million in humanitarian aid since 2014. The United States also provides military assistance to Ukraine: more than $1.6 billion since 2014, mainly though the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative.
[Show full text]
|State Archives of Odessa Region
r r | STATE ARCHIVES OF ODESSA REGION Guardian Committee for Foreign Settlers in South Russia FOND 6, INVENTORY 4 1856-1863 Prepared by Lilia Belousova File Title of the file in Russian Title of the file in English and description of documents Inclusive dates Quant Lang. # of ECONOMIC Dept. DESK 1 1 17683* O6 ycTpoiicTBe Ha MepaaKe 3flaHHfl About arrangement of a room at the attic-storey of the Khortiza Central College. 03.11.1856-27.111856 5 XopTMlJKOft UeHTpanbHOM UlKOiibl KOMH3TbK MISSING 2 17694* O6 OTO6paHMM nOK33aHMfl OT About taking evidences from the heirs of Barteis and about overseas inheritances of 12.11.1856-04.08.1862 15 HacneAHMKOB EapTenbca m o the mennonites Klassen and Warkontin. 3arpaHMMKOM HacneACTBe MeHHo- hmtob KnacceH m BapKetmiH. MISSING 3 17706* O6 OTflaneHMM kojiohhh About separation of the colony of Kronenthal from the Neusatz District. 07.12.1856-17.09.1857 6 KpoHem-ajib ot Hefoauicoro oKpyra. MISSING 4 17707* no npeflnMcaHMio 1-ro flenapTa- On direction of the 1st Department of State Domains to transfer 78 rubles & 99 kopecks 08.12.1856-11.11.1857 6 MeHTa FocyAapcTBeHHbix MMymecTB of inherited money to the mennonite of the colony of Neuburg in Ekaterynoslav c npenpoBO)KfieHMeM 78 py6.99 Kon. Guberniya Peter Enns after death of his father. flOBOAfllMMXCfl B HaCJieflCTBO MeHHOHMTy EKaTepMHocnascKOM MISSING ry6opHMM, kojiohmm Hetf6ypr, FleTpy 3ncy nocne yMepuero ero OTua. 5 17710* O6 ynpa3AHeHMM Kommccmh cenb- About abolition of the Agricultural Commission in Berdyansk District. 12.12.1856-20.11.1862 21 CKOro XO3flMCTBa B BepflflHCKOM OKpyre. MISSING ECONOMIC Dept.
[Show full text]