DOCSLIB.ORG

Rise of the API Copyright Dead: an Updated Epitaph for Copyright Protection of Network and Functional Features of Computer Software Peter S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rise of the API Copyright Dead: an Updated Epitaph for Copyright Protection of Network and Functional Features of Computer Software Peter S Berkeley Law Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship Spring 3-1-2018 Rise of the API Copyright Dead: An Updated Epitaph for Copyright Protection of Network and Functional Features of Computer Software Peter S. Menell Berkeley Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/facpubs Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rise of the API Copyright Dead: An Updated Epitaph for Copyright Protection of Network and Functional Features of Computer Software, 31 Harv. J. L. & Tech. 305 (2018) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Harvard Journal ofLaw & Technology Volume 31, Special Issue Spring 2018 RISE OF THE API COPYRIGHT DEAD?: AN UPDATED EPITAPH FOR COPYRIGHT PROTECTION OF NETWORK AND FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE Peter S. Menell* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 3 07 11. COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1. 0 ........... 313 A. A PersonalAccount .................................................................. 313 B. Setting the Stage ....................................................................... 314 1. The Intellectual Property Backdrop: Legislation and Legislative History .......................................................... 315 2. Network Economics .............................................................. 318 3. The Industrial Backdrop ........................................................ 319 C. The AP! Copyright War ........................................................... 321 1. Jurispmdence ......................................................................... 322 i. The Early Years .................................................................. 323 ii. The Modern Software Copyright Era ................................ 326 2. Legislative Developments ..................................................... 341 D. The End of the First AP! Copyright War and the Logic of the Intellectual Property System ........................................ 342 III. COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2. 0: THE ORACLE WAVE ....................................................................... 343 A. The Technological and Industrial Context ............................... 345 1. The Java Story ....................................................................... 346 i. The Corporate Environment: Sun Microsystems in the 1980s and 1990s ................................................. 346 ii. Development ofJava .......................................................... 34 7 iii. The Setting Sun ................................................................. 3 55 2. Google, the Mobile Computing Revolution, and Development of Android ................................................ 357 3. Oracle's Acquisition of Sun Microsystems ........................... 3 72 * Koret Professor of Law and Director of the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, University of California at Berkeley School of Law. I thank Jonathan Band, Dylan Hadfield­ Menell, Justin Hughes, Mark Lemley, David Nimmer, Tim Simcoe, aud Christopher Yoo as well as participants at various presentations (Boston University School of Law, Harvard Law School, New York University School of Law, University of Pennsylvania School of Law, U.C. Berkeley School of Law, U.C.L.A. School of Law) for comments on earlier drafts. Alex Barata, Louise Decoppet, Amit Elazari, aud Andrea Hall provided excellent research assistance. 306 Harvard Journal ofLaw & Technology [Vol. 31 B. The Oracle v. Google Litigation ............................................... 375 1. Oracle's Complaint and Pretrial Case Management... ........... 375 2. 2012 Trial .............................................................................. 378 3. Federal Circuit Appeal .......................................................... 386 i. Copyrightability .................................................................. 388 a. Declaring Code ............................................................... 3 8 8 b. SSO of the API Packages ............................................... 389 ii. Fair Use ............................................................................. 390 4. Interlocutory Certiorari Petition ............................................ 390 5. 2016 Fair Use Trial ............................................................... 391 i. Opening Arguments ............................................................ 393 ii. Google's Case in Chief ..................................................... 395 iii. Oracle 's Case in Chief. .................................................... 400 iv. Google's Rebuttal ............................................................. 404 v. Closing Arguments ............................................................. 405 vi. Jury Verdict ....................................................................... 410 6. The Road Ahead .................................................................... 410 C. The Current Murky State ofAP I Copyright Protection ........... 414 IV. THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF API COPYRIGHT PROTECTION .................................................................................. 416 A. Legal Analysis .......................................................................... 41 7 1. Overarching Principles .......................................................... 418 2. Critique of the Federal Circuit Copyrightability Decision .......................................................................... 421 i. Misinterpretation of the Copyright Act ............................... 422 a. Misreading Section 102 .................................................. 422 b. Legislative Intent and Purpose ....................................... 424 ii. Misreading Ninth Circuit Jurisprudence ........................... 427 a. Viability of the Lotus Decision in the Ninth Circuit ....... 427 b. Disregarding the Sega/Sony Decisions ........................... 429 c. Resurrecting the Third Circuit's Apple/Whelan Decisions .......................................................... 431 iii. Conflation ofExpressive and Technological "Creativity" ............................................................. 433 iv. Overly Rigid Approach to Limiting Doctrines .................. 43 8 v. Treating AP! Design as Variable Expression Rather than Unique Function ............................................... 442 3. Proper Legal Frameworks for Analyzing Copyright Protection for Computer Software .................................. 443 i. AP! Design .......................................................................... 444 ii. Computer Code .................................................................. 446 a. Independent Creation ...................................................... 44 7 b. Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison ................................ 450 Special Issue] API Copyright 307 iii. Other Software Elements .................................................. 451 B. Policy Analysis ......................................................................... 452 1. Economic Analysis of Legal Protection for Computer Software .......................................................................... 452 i. The Public Goods Problem ................................................. 452 ii. Network Externalities ........................................................ 456 2. The Evolution of Software Markets ...................................... 460 3. The Optimality of Limited Copyright Protection for Computer Software ......................................................... 464 4. Impediments to Achieving the Proper Copyright Balance Posed by the Oracle v. Google Litigation ......... 4 71 V. CONCLUSION ................................................................................ 473 APPENDIXA: GLOSSARY .................................................................. 474 APPENDIXB: PRINCIPAL PARTICIPANTS ........................................... 479 APPENDIXC: TIMELINE .................................................................... 482 APPENDIXD: THE37 JAVAAPI PACKAGES IMPLEMENTED IN ANDROID ....................................................................................... 486 APPENDIX E: 2016 FAIR USE TRIAL SUMMARY ............................... 489 I. INTRODUCTION As the great Yogi Berra redundantly said, "It's like deja vu all over again."1 For IP scholars and practitioners of my generation, Ora­ cle Corporation's lawsuit alleging that Google's Android mobile plat­ form infringes copyright in the Java application program interface ("API") elements has been a stroll down memory lane. 2 Or perhaps less nostalgically for those in the software industry, a zombie horror film set in Silicon Valley.3 1. See YOGI BERRA, THE YOGI BOOK: I DIDN'T SAY EVERYIBING I SAID 9 (1998) (ex­ plaining that the deja vu quotation was inspired by Yankees' sluggers Mickey Mantle and Roger Maris's repeated back-to-back home runs in the early 1960s). 2. As Judge Alsup noted in an early ruling in the Oracle litigation, "[t]he term API is slippery." See Order Partially Granting and Partially Denying Defendant's Mot. for Sum­ mary Judgment on Copyright Claim at 4, Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 1002, 1007 (N.D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why I Hate Microsoft by F.W
    Why I hate Microsoft by F.W. van Wensveen Why I hate Microsoft "A personal, lengthy, but highly articulate outburst" by F.W. van Wensveen Table of contents Introduction A brief introduction, or why this paper needed to be written Abstract The management summary 1. From the people who brought you EDLIN Microsoft and innovation 2. The not-so-good, the bad and the ugly The general quality of Microsoft products 3. The power to bind Formats and standards 4. World domination From business to megalomania 5. Bad practice, foul play Exploring the limits of lawful conduct 6. Caveat Emptor Think before you buy 7. Where are you forced to go today? Price gouging and other monopolist practices 8. The road ahead On diminishing returns and continuing trends Appendix A A brief overview of Windows' most serious design flaws Appendix B Links Introduction "One OS to bring them all and in the darkness bind them..." From the title of this paper you may have guessed that I am not very impressed with the guys in Redmond. One might even say that my dislike for Microsoft is a pet hate gone out of control in an almost quixotic fashion. Why is this? Of course I have been accused of personal antipathy, of being jealous of Bill Gates and his billions, and of being prejudiced against all things Microsoft without any reason whatsoever. None of this is true. I have nothing personal against Bill Gates. Why should I? I don't know the man, I've never met him. I agree with those who say he might be the most successful salesman in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Gates – a Story of Success
    Bill Gates – A story of Success William H. Gates is chairperson and chief software architect of Microsoft Corporation, the worldwide leader in software services and Internet technologies for personal and business computing. Bill Gates was born on October 28, 1955 in a family having rich business, political and community service background. His great-grandfather was a state legislator and a mayor, his grandfather was vice president of national bank and his father was a lawyer. Bill strongly believes in hard work. He believes that if you are intelligent and know how to apply your intelligence, you can achieve anything. From childhood Bill was ambitious, intelligent and competitive. These qualities helped him to attain top position in the profession he chose. In school, he had an excellent record in mathematics and science. Still he was getting very bored in school and his parents knew it, so they always tried to feed him with more information to keep him busy. Bill’s parents came to know their son's intelligence and decided to enroll him in a private school, known for its intense academic environment. It was a very important decision in Bill Gate's life where he was first introduced to a computer. Bill Gates and his friends were very much interested in computer and formed "Programmers Group" in late 1968. Being in this group, they found a new way to apply their computer skill in university of Washington. In the next year, they got their first opportunity in Information Sciences Inc. in which they were selected as programmers. ISI (Information Sciences Inc.) agreed to give them royalties whenever it made money from any of the group’s program.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Computing
    Personal Computing Thomas J. Bergin ©Computer History Museum American University Recap: Context • By 1977, there was a fairly robust but fragmented hobbyist-oriented microcomputer industry: – Micro Instrumentation Telemetry Systems (MITS) – Processor Technology – Cromemco – MicroStuf – Kentucky Fried Computers • Two things were needed for the personal computer revolution: 1) a way to store and retrieve data, and 2) a programming language in which to write applications. Homebrew Computer Club • March 5, 1975: the Amateur Computer Users Group (Lee Felsenstein, Bob Marsh, Steve Dompier, BobAlbrecht and 27 others) met in Gordon French’s garage, Menlo Park, CA • 3rd meeting drew several hundred people and was moved to the Coleman mansion • Stanford Linear Accelerator Center’s auditorium – Steve Wozniak shows off his single board computer – Steve Jobs attends meetings Homebrew-ed • 21 companies formed: – Apcose Apple – Cromemco Morrow – North Star Osborne • West Coast Computer Faire • Byte magazine, September 1975 • Byte Shop Both: images.google.com And then there was Traf-O-Data • October 28, 1955: William H. Gates III born – father: attorney mother: schoolteacher • Lakeside School: Lakeside Programming Group – Mothers Club: access to time-shared system at GE – Students hired by local firm to debug software – First computer program: Tic-Tac-Toe (age 13) – Traf-O-Data to sell traffic mgt. software (age 16) • 1973, Bill Gates enrolls at Harvard in pre-law. • Paul Allen is in his second year. January 1975, Popular Electronics: Altair • Allen shows
    [Show full text]
  • Download Assembly PDF (Pro Version)
    PARTS LIST Ω Ω Ω µ Ω µ Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω OTHER PARTS YOU MAY NEED ″ Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω µ Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω CONGRATULATIONS! YOUR ALTAIR 8800 IS COMPLETE! Altair 8800 Simulator © 2017-2019 David Hansel https://www.hackster.io/david-hansel/arduino-altair-8800- simulator-3594a6 https://github.com/dhansel/Altair8800 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................... - 2 - Highlights .............................................................................................. - 3 - Front Panel Elements ............................................................................ - 4 - Auxiliary Switch Functions .................................................................... - 5 - Serial ports .......................................................................................... - 12 - Interacting with software via a terminal ............................................. - 15 - Printer Emulation ................................................................................ - 18 - MITS Disk Controller Support .............................................................. - 19 - Tarbell Disk Controller Support ........................................................... - 21 - Hard Disk Support ............................................................................... - 23 - Cromemco Dazzler Support ................................................................ - 25 - - 1 - Processor Technology VDM-1 Support ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Gates, "Keynote Address to the Creating Digital Dividends Conference" (18 October 2000)
    Voices of Democracy 2 (2007): 227‐243 French 227 BILL GATES, "KEYNOTE ADDRESS TO THE CREATING DIGITAL DIVIDENDS CONFERENCE" (18 OCTOBER 2000) Sandra L. French Radford University Abstract: In the first twenty‐five years of Microsoft, Bill Gates established himself and his company as a powerful social force in the advancement of technology. Gates' keynote address to the 2000 Creating Digital Dividends conference, however, surprised attendees and the press by arguing against the establishment of technology in underdeveloped nations in favor of promotion world equity in healthcare. This speech presents a major shift in Gates' persona, and was largely derided as insincere philanthropy. Key Words: digital divide, technology, Bill Gates, health, crisis, computers. The influence of Bill Gates on technology, society, and global economics is undisputed. He co‐founded Microsoft in 1975 with the vision of a "computer on every desk and in every home"—a computer that would, of course, be running Microsoft software. In the first twenty‐five years of Microsoft, their software products have become the primary method for working, obtaining information, and communicating online. Gates' tenure as Microsoft's chief executive has come to symbolize for many the dawn of the information age and the resultant digital capitalism. Images of Gates are filtered to the public through the mass media and the increasing technological literacy of the global world. Technology is a popular subject of study for contemporary rhetoricians, and has been examined at the micro and macro levels. While much has been written about the development of the personal computer and its impact on society, little attention has been given to technology's business leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Software As a Service in Software Piracy”
    Universidade Católica Portuguesa Católica Lisbon School of Business and Economics “The impact of Software as a Service in Software Piracy” Has the change in the distribution and sale of software provided not only an accurate answer against software piracy but also an increase in consumer-value? Advisor: Professor Nicoletta Corrocher Discussant: Professor Lars Jeppesen Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of MSc in Business Administration, at the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, December, 2012. Master of Science Thesis of: João, Fonseca George 1609221 2012-2013 Table of Contents Abstract and Literature Review ....................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction .................................................................................... 2 What is Software? ....................................................................................... 5 How will we distinguish between the different software programs? ............. 5 What types of software are there according to function? ............................ 5 What types of software are there according to accessibility? ...................... 7 What is Innovation? ..................................................................................... 8 Section 2: The Evolution of the Software Industry ........................................ 9 Software Contracting and the Origins of the Industry ................................ 10 Development of the Software Industry: The Personal Computer as a platform
    [Show full text]
  • E Bill Gates
    E Bill Gates Bill Gates nacque il 28 Ottobre del 1955 a Seattle. Nel 1968, l'anno in cui si iscrisse alla prestigiosa scuola privata Lakeside , Gates e i suoi compagni ebbero accesso per la prima volta ad un computer , un DEC PDP- 11 di proprietà della Computer Center Corporation Alla fine del 1968, Gates, Allen ed altri due hacker del gruppo (Ric Weiland e Kent Evans), fondarono la Lakeside Programmers Group. Una società li assunse per trovare le debolezze del loro sistema, ed in cambio diede loro tempo illimitato al computer. Nel marzo del 1970 la società chiuse e la Lakeside Programmers Group dovette cercare altri modi per ottenere accesso ad un computer. Trovarono la Information Science Inc ., che li accettò per la creazione di un programma di gestione paghe, promettendo in cambio, oltre all'accesso al computer, anche una royalty se dai programmi del gruppo si fossero avuti dei guadagni. In quel periodo accade che gli altri tre del gruppo chiesero a Gates di lasciare il gruppo, perché il lavoro non sembrava sufficiente per tutti, ma Gates li convinse a tenerlo con loro. Successivamente, nel 1972, Bill e Paul fondarono la Traf-O-Data, che progettò un computer per misurare il traffico stradale La Traf-O-Data durò fino alla fine degli studi di Bill. I due lavorarono insieme anche per informatizzare il sistema di gestione della scuola . Negli ultimi anni di scuola, ebbero l'invito dalla TRW, non solo di trovare le debolezze del loro sistema ma anche di programmare i rimedi.Nel 1973, Gary Kildall scrisse un semplice sistema operativo nel suo linguaggio PL/M, il CP/M (Control Program/Monitor), e lasciò i sorgenti accessibili a tutti per scopi didattici.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discursive Coding of Software: a Study of the Relationship Between Stability and Change Jennifer Helene Maher Iowa State University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Repository @ Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2006 The discursive coding of software: a study of the relationship between stability and change Jennifer Helene Maher Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Discourse and Text Linguistics Commons, Other Communication Commons, Programming Languages and Compilers Commons, and the Rhetoric and Composition Commons Recommended Citation Maher, Jennifer Helene, "The discursive coding of software: a study of the relationship between stability and change" (2006). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 13941. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/13941 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The discursive coding of software: A study of the relationship between stability and change by Jennifer Helene Maher A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Rhetoric and Professional Communication Program of Study Committee: David Russell, Major Professor Carl Herndl Dorothy Winsor Diane Price Herndl David Schweingruber Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2006 Copyright © Jennifer Helene Maher, 2006. All rights reserved UMI Number: 3243534 UMI Microform 3243534 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Volume 31, Special Issue Spring 2018
    Harvard Journal ofLaw & Technology Volume 31, Special Issue Spring 2018 RISE OF THE API COPYRIGHT DEAD?: AN UPDATED EPITAPH FOR COPYRIGHT PROTECTION OF NETWORK AND FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE Peter S. Menell* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 3 07 11. COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1. 0 ........... 313 A. A PersonalAccount .................................................................. 313 B. Setting the Stage ....................................................................... 314 1. The Intellectual Property Backdrop: Legislation and Legislative History .......................................................... 315 2. Network Economics .............................................................. 318 3. The Industrial Backdrop ........................................................ 319 C. The AP! Copyright War ........................................................... 321 1. Jurispmdence ......................................................................... 322 i. The Early Years .................................................................. 323 ii. The Modern Software Copyright Era ................................ 326 2. Legislative Developments ..................................................... 341 D. The End of the First AP! Copyright War and the Logic of the Intellectual Property System ........................................ 342 III. COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2. 0: THE ORACLE WAVE ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pagetable.Com
    12/11/2019 Microsoft BASIC for 6502 Original Source Code [1978] – pagetable.com pagetable.com About Some Assembly Required Twitter: Microsoft BASIC for 6502 Original @pagetable Source Code [1978] Mastodon: 2015-01-13 by Michael Steil @pagetable@mastodo n.social This is the original 1978 source code of Microsoft BASIC for 6502 with all original comments, documentation and easter eggs: Categories 6502 Amiga Apple Archeology BASIC Bildschirmtext C64 C128 https://www.pagetable.com/?p=774 1/31 12/11/2019 Microsoft BASIC for 6502 Original Source Code [1978] – pagetable.com TITLE BASIC M6502 8K VER 1.1 BY MICRO-SOFT SEARCH M6502 Commodore SALL RADIX 10 ;THROUGHOUT ALL BUT MATH-PAK. Commodore Peripheral Digital Video DOS $Z:: ;STARTING POINT FOR M6502 SIMULATOR Bus Final ORG 0 ;START OFF AT LOCATION ZERO. SUBTTL SWITCHES,MACROS. Cartridge III Floppy REALIO=4 ;5=STM Disks Game Boy GEOS ;4=APPLE. ;3=COMMODORE. ;2=OSI GitHub Hacks ;1=MOS TECH,KIM Hardware KERNAL ;0=PDP-10 SIMULATING 6502 INTPRC==1 ;INTEGER ARRAYS. ADDPRC==1 ;FOR ADDITIONAL PRECISION. Literature LNGERR==0 ;LONG ERROR MESSAGES. TIME== 0 ;CAPABILITY TO SET AND READ A CLK. Operating Systems EXTIO== 0 ;EXTERNAL I/O PET Presentation M6502.MAC (1978-07-27, 6955 lines, 161,685 bytes) Puzzle SCUMM Security Tapes This is currently the oldest publicly available piece of source written by Bill Gates. Teardown TED Tricks Trivia Uncategorized Language VIC-20 Virtualization Whines X16 x86 Xbox Like the 8080 version, the 6502 version was developed on a PDP-10, using the MACRO-10 assembler. A set of macros developed by Paul Allen allowed MACRO-10 to understand and translate 6502 assembly, albeit in a modified format to fit the syntax of macros, for example: github MOS 6502 MACRO-10 LDA #0 LDAI 0 https://www.pagetable.com/?p=774 2/31 12/11/2019 Microsoft BASIC for 6502 Original Source Code [1978] – pagetable.com LDA (ADDR),Y LDADY ADDR MACRO-10 did not support hex numbers, which is why most numbers are in decimal mist64 format.
    [Show full text]
  • FPCUG Notes for January 2020 Editor: Frank Fota ([email protected])
    FPCUG Notes for January 2020 Editor: Frank Fota ([email protected]) SCHEDULE OF EVENTS (7:00 PM - Falmouth Firehouse, Butler Road): -- Wed, Jan 1: Happy New Year! -- Tues, Jan 9: Board of Directors (BoD) Meeting (Patty Davis, Presiding) -- Thu, Jan 11: General Meeting. Deaf and Hard of Hearing Coordinator, ReBecca Bennett and Deaf and Hard of Hearing Assistant, Diann Drew of the disAbility Resource Center will discuss Assistive Technology for the deaf and hard of hearing and how to get a Service Dog. The public is invited and refreshments will be served. -- Tues, Jan 14: All About Your Computer (Robert Monroe) -- Wed, Jan 15: Experimax Workshop – 1865-106 Carl D. Silver Parkway -- Mon, Jan 20: Martin Luther King Day -- Thu, Jan 24: Windows All Workshop (Jim Hopkins) – weather permitting TOP TECH OF 2019 In a CNET video review, Jason Hiner lists 44 outstanding products in five popular categories in tech: mobile; home entertainment; computers; smart home; and software, apps, and services. A video montage is embedded in the article linked above. 1. Mobile. CNET names the Motorola Moto G7 as a great budget phone. Their high-end nominee was the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 for its mix of style and substance. On a personal note, pardon the pun, the Note 10 was not prone to spontaneous combustion. Based on the additional features and a price drop, the iPhone 11 was noted in the middle. 2. Home Entertainment. Two TVs led this category. The TCL 6-Series image and color quality rival that of much more expensive televisions. The LG OLED B9 presented unmatched contrast and viewing angles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microprocessor and the Personal Computer
    2/18/20 15-292 History of Computing The microprocessor and the personal computer 1 Intel 4004 Considered the world's first microprocessor. 4-bit CPU. It was released November 15th, 1971. The 4004 circuit was built of 2,300 transistors. Originally designed for the Japanese company Busicom to be used in their line of calculators. The chief designers of the chip were Stan Mazor, Federico Faggin and Marcian “Ted” Hoff of Intel and Masatoshi Shima of Busicom. (L to R) Mazor, Faggin, Hoff, Shima 2 1 2/18/20 Intel 4004 • Federico Faggin leaves Intel in 1974 to start Zilog, a rival company (maker of the Z80 microprocessor). • Intel “disowns” his contribution to the invention of the microprocessor in patents and advertising. 3 The first 8-bit microprocessors The 8008 was an early CPU designed and manufactured by Intel, introduced in April 1972. The 8080 was designed and manufactured by Intel, released in April 1974 and sold for $360. The 6800 was produced by Motorola and released shortly after the Intel 8080 in 1975. The 6502 was designed by MOS Technologies and introduced in September 1975. The Z80 was designed and manufactured by Zilog from 1976 onwards. It was widely used both in desktop and embedded computer designs and is one of the most popular CPU's of all time 4 2 2/18/20 Altair 8800 A microcomputer design announced in January 1975, based on the Intel 8080 CPU. Sold as a kit through Popular Electronics Manufactured by Micro Instrumentation Telemetry Systems (MITS) in Abuquerque, NM by Ed Roberts and others.
    [Show full text]