The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit in the General Epistles and the Book of Hebrews1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 23/2 (2012):72-111. Article copyright © 2012 by Larry L. Lichtenwalter. The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit in the General Epistles and the Book of Hebrews1 Larry L. Lichtenwalter Middle East University Beirut, Lebanon Introduction Few discussions of the New Testament pneumatology focus on either the General Epistles2 or the Book of Hebrews3 where references to the Holy 1 Presented at the Seventh-day Adventist South American Division Biblical-Theological Symposium on Pneumatology, Iguassu Falls, PR, Brazil, May 20-23, 2011. 2 The letters of James; 1 and 2 Peter; 1, 2 and 3 John; and Jude are known collectively as the General or Catholic Epistles on the grounds that they were originally addressed to early Christians in general rather than to specific individuals or congregations. See Philip B. Harner, What Are They Saying About the Catholic Epistles? (New York, NY: Paulist Press, 2004), 1. 3 While Hebrews has been included among the letters of Paul since ancient times, it’s placement between the letters of Paul and the General Epistles reflects awareness among earlier scholars of the work’s distinctiveness (James W. Thompson, Hebrews (ed. Mikeal G. Parsons and Charles H. Talbert; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008), 4.) The book identifies neither the author nor its recipients. There is absence too, of normal epistolary conventions. There are few clues for its dating or location. Though many maintain that Hebrews is a letter written to Jewish Christians who were tempted to return to Judaism, the book gives rather a coherent reorienting picture of the issues any Christians living during the time were facing. Hebrews challenges every reader with a vision of reality, an understanding of Jesus Christ, and a sense of Christian identity and hope in a world of ambiguity and uncertainty. See Luke Timothy Johnson, Hebrews: A Commentary (ed. C. Clifton Black; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2006), 1-3; Thompson, Hebrews, 7, 20-21. In light of these observations, this study purposefully includes the book of Hebrews in a discussion of pneumatology along with that of the General Epistles. While 72 LICHTENWALTER: PERSON AND WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT Spirit are rare, brief, and passing—seemingly more of an aside than a well- defined focus. Since the clearest emphasis on the lively activity of the Holy Spirit in the early years of the Church is found in the writings of Luke, Paul, and John’s Gospel,4 what more could these oft “forgotten books in the back of the New Testament”5 bring to the discussion? What do they have to say on pneumatology? What more might they tell us about the Holy Spirit within the early Church—or within normative Christian experience? What model, if any, would they provide? What further insight might they give into the Church’s pneumatology as its members encountered the challenges of the Greco-Roman world, the variety and ferment of its own expanding membership, the emergence within of subtle enervating heresies, and the articulation of its beliefs and praxis? What continued link between the Spirit’s decent at Pentecost and the church’s sustained vision of the resurrected Christ would we observe? Any inquiry into the pneumatology of the General Epistles or the Book of Hebrews inevitably asks such questions—and more. We begin by placing these books in historical context. The outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost enabled the early Church to envision (as well as experience and proclaim the benefits of) the not a General Epistle as such, the message of Hebrews is nevertheless addressed to early Christians in general rather than to specific individuals or congregations. In doing so this author does not deny Pauline authorship of the book. 4 Gary M. Burge, The Anointed Community: The Holy Spirit in the Johannine Tradition (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1987), xi. 5 In comparison to the rest of the New Testament writings, the General Epistles and the Book of Hebrews for the most part have been neglected with regard to discussions on many New Testament matters. It is felt that one can hardly find an elaborate theology in such short letters like the General Epistles. Recent scholarship however, is bringing a greater understanding of these books as well as a deeper appreciation for their rich contribution to Christian faith and life. See ibid.; Craig L. Blomberg & Miriam J. Kamell, James (ed. Clinton E. Arnold; Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008), 21-35. The enigmatic nature of Hebrews together with its breadth of ideas, stately flow of argument (the longest sustained argument in the NT) and challenging assertions have likewise led it to be a neglected part of New Testament theological reflection. See Marie E. Isaacs, Reading Hebrews and James: A Literary and Theological Commentary (Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Publishing, Inc., 2002), 3-17; Johnson, Hebrews: A Commentary, 1-3; William G. Johnsson, In Absolute Confidence: The Book of Hebrews Speaks to Our Day (Nashville, TN: Southern Publishing Association, 1979), 9-11; George R. Knight, Exploring Hebrews: A Devotional Commentary (Hagerstown, MD: Review & Herald Publishing Association, 2003), 21; Thompson, Hebrews, 3-20. 73 JOURNAL OF THE ADVENTIST THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY exaltation and coronation of Christ (Acts 2:1-36). The Spirit was to fall on all because Jesus was Lord of all (Acts 2:36). The Spirit’s coming shattered the church’s understanding of reality with a new image of Jesus and discipleship. The Holy Spirit was a worldview transforming sign from heaven (Acts 2:16-22; cf. Eph 1:13; 4:30; Heb 2:4; 6:4, 5). Thus the Spirit’s decent animated the Church’s identity and zeal for mission to the world, so much so that the Church literally burst upon the Greco-Roman world(Acts 2:40-47; 4:4; 5:14; Col 1:23; cf. Acts. 28:30-31; 1:8). Within one generation the gospel of the exalted Christ reached across the civilized world turning it upside down (Acts 17:6). This incredible expansion was not without opposition both from the Greco-Roman world, which the Church sought to win, and from the ferment of enervating heresies within her own community. How could the Church sustain momentum and maintain spiritual/doctrinal integrity against these counter realities? How could she sustain her vision of the exalted Christ? Would matters of the Spirit still factor large? The answer in part is found in the General Epistles together with the Book of Hebrews. Written in the turbulence of the above-mentioned challenges, their respective messages unfold theological and practical concerns during the chaotic years at the beginning, the close, and throughout first century Christian writing.6 They reveal, so to speak, “a 6 James is the first of the so-called Catholic or General Epistles and likely provides one of the earliest New Testament documents written—perhaps the first Christian writing of any kind of which we know of very early Jewish Christianity—suggesting to the modern reader that these are our roots. Scholars place James’ death in A.D. 62 and suggest the letter may have been written somewhere before the apostolic council in Jerusalem (A.D. 48-49). The thinking is that if the letter had been written after the apostolic council in Jerusalem it surely would have mentioned the issues from that momentous occasion. Thus the letter was most likely written in the early to mid-40s. See Andrew Chester, “The Theology of James,” in The Theology of the Letters of James, Peter, and Jude (ed. James D. G. Dunn; Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1994), 1-62; Harner, What Are They Saying About the Catholic Epistles? , 1- 20; D. Edmond Hiebert, The Epistles of James: Tests of Living Faith (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1979), 39-41; Kamell, James, 35; Ralph P. Martin. “The Theology of Jude, 1 Peter, and 2 Peter,” in The Theology of the Letters of James, Peter, and Jude (ed. James D. G. Dunn; Cambridge: University Press, 1994), 63-168. The letters of Paul are also quite early with scholars placing Galatians as early as A.D. 48 (see Carl P. Cosaert, Galatians: A Fiery Response to a Struggling Church [Review and Herald Publishing Association, 2011], 19- 22). On the other end of the century’s spectrum, the Epistles of John highlight spiritual and ecclesiological issues at the close of the first century. 74 LICHTENWALTER: PERSON AND WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT theology on the run”7 where much is assumed, tacit, unfinished. Throughout, significant elements of faith regarding the Holy Spirit emerge by way of passing comments or brief points made during the course of arguments. The Church’s pneumatology however, is more pervasive than the few references might suggest. Each writer worked within a larger triune God mindset; where two persons of the Godhead could be related together and by implication includes the third.8 The implications of this Trinitarian mindset comprise distinctness of persons, ontological equality/oneness, and role diversity: in other words, the three members of the Godhead equally share in the divine being.9 Christian experience in effect, is envisioned as one with the Triune God. It means—from the standpoint of the Godhead—Triune atonement (Heb 9:14; 10:29-31), invitation to know the Triune God (Acts 2:38-39), Trinitarian salvation (Rom 5:5-6; 8:9, 11; Eph 7 The experience of each leader/writer together with the Holy Spirit led to corresponding Spirit guided theological reflection and exhortation, which in turn would mold the church’s understanding and way of life (experience). 8 Within the same thought context, the authors may casually refer to the different members of the Trinity.