ENGO Proposed Reserve Report
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and Related Scrub
Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and related scrub Eucryphia lucida Vegetation Condition Benchmarks version 1 Rainforest and Related Scrub RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum peatland facies Community Description: Athrotaxis cupressoides (5–8 m) forms small woodland patches or appears as copses and scattered small trees. On the Central Plateau (and other dolerite areas such as Mount Field), broad poorly– drained valleys and small glacial depressions may contain scattered A. cupressoides trees and copses over Sphagnum cristatum bogs. In the treeless gaps, Sphagnum cristatum is usually overgrown by a combination of any of Richea scoparia, R. gunnii, Baloskion australe, Epacris gunnii and Gleichenia alpina. This is one of three benchmarks available for assessing the condition of RPW. This is the appropriate benchmark to use in assessing the condition of the Sphagnum facies of the listed Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland community (Schedule 3A, Nature Conservation Act 2002). Benchmarks: Length Component Cover % Height (m) DBH (cm) #/ha (m)/0.1 ha Canopy 10% - - - Large Trees - 6 20 5 Organic Litter 10% - Logs ≥ 10 - 2 Large Logs ≥ 10 Recruitment Continuous Understorey Life Forms LF code # Spp Cover % Immature tree IT 1 1 Medium shrub/small shrub S 3 30 Medium sedge/rush/sagg/lily MSR 2 10 Ground fern GF 1 1 Mosses and Lichens ML 1 70 Total 5 8 Last reviewed – 2 November 2016 Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment http://www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au/tasveg RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum facies Species lists: Canopy Tree Species Common Name Notes Athrotaxis cupressoides pencil pine Present as a sparse canopy Typical Understorey Species * Common Name LF Code Epacris gunnii coral heath S Richea scoparia scoparia S Richea gunnii bog candleheath S Astelia alpina pineapple grass MSR Baloskion australe southern cordrush MSR Gleichenia alpina dwarf coralfern GF Sphagnum cristatum sphagnum ML *This list is provided as a guide only. -
Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation
Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Highland treeless vegetation Richea scoparia Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Highland treeless vegetation Community (Code) Page Alpine coniferous heathland (HCH) 4 Cushion moorland (HCM) 6 Eastern alpine heathland (HHE) 8 Eastern alpine sedgeland (HSE) 10 Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) 12 Western alpine heathland (HHW) 13 Western alpine sedgeland/herbland (HSW) 15 General description Rainforest and related scrub, Dry eucalypt forest and woodland, Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes. Highland treeless vegetation communities occur Likewise, some non-forest communities with wide within the alpine zone where the growth of trees is environmental amplitudes, such as wetlands, may be impeded by climatic factors. The altitude above found in alpine areas. which trees cannot survive varies between approximately 700 m in the south-west to over The boundaries between alpine vegetation communities are usually well defined, but 1 400 m in the north-east highlands; its exact location depends on a number of factors. In many communities may occur in a tight mosaic. In these parts of Tasmania the boundary is not well defined. situations, mapping community boundaries at Sometimes tree lines are inverted due to exposure 1:25 000 may not be feasible. This is particularly the or frost hollows. problem in the eastern highlands; the class Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) is used in There are seven specific highland heathland, those areas where remote sensing does not provide sedgeland and moorland mapping communities, sufficient resolution. including one undifferentiated class. Other highland treeless vegetation such as grasslands, herbfields, A minor revision in 2017 added information on the grassy sedgelands and wetlands are described in occurrence of peatland pool complexes, and other sections. -
World Heritage Values and to Identify New Values
FLORISTIC VALUES OF THE TASMANIAN WILDERNESS WORLD HERITAGE AREA J. Balmer, J. Whinam, J. Kelman, J.B. Kirkpatrick & E. Lazarus Nature Conservation Branch Report October 2004 This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment (World Heritage Area Vegetation Program). Commonwealth Government funds were contributed to the project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment or those of the Department of the Environment and Heritage. ISSN 1441–0680 Copyright 2003 Crown in right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any means without permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Published by Nature Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart Tasmania, 7001 Front Cover Photograph: Alpine bolster heath (1050 metres) at Mt Anne. Stunted Nothofagus cunninghamii is shrouded in mist with Richea pandanifolia scattered throughout and Astelia alpina in the foreground. Photograph taken by Grant Dixon Back Cover Photograph: Nothofagus gunnii leaf with fossil imprint in deposits dating from 35-40 million years ago: Photograph taken by Greg Jordan Cite as: Balmer J., Whinam J., Kelman J., Kirkpatrick J.B. & Lazarus E. (2004) A review of the floristic values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2004/3. Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, Tasmania, Australia T ABLE OF C ONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................1 1. -
Threatened Species Protection Act 1995
Contents (1995 - 83) Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 Long Title Part 1 - Preliminary 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Interpretation 4. Objectives to be furthered 5. Administration of public authorities 6. Crown to be bound Part 2 - Administration 7. Functions of Secretary 8. Scientific Advisory Committee 9. Community Review Committee Part 3 - Conservation of Threatened Species Division 1 - Threatened species strategy 10. Threatened species strategy 11. Procedure for making strategy 12. Amendment and revocation of strategy Division 2 - Listing of threatened flora and fauna 13. Lists of threatened flora and fauna 14. Notification by Minister and right of appeal 15. Eligibility for listing 16. Nomination for listing 17. Consideration of nomination by SAC 18. Preliminary recommendation by SAC 19. Final recommendation by SAC 20. CRC to be advised of public notification 21. Minister's decision Division 3 - Listing statements 22. Listing statements Division 4 - Critical habitats 23. Determination of critical habitats 24. Amendment and revocation of determinations Division 5 - Recovery plans for threatened species 25. Recovery plans 26. Amendment and revocation of recovery plans Division 6 - Threat abatement plans 27. Threat abatement plans 28. Amendment and revocation of threat abatement plans Division 7 - Land management plans and agreements 29. Land management plans 30. Agreements arising from land management plans 31. Public authority management agreements Part 4 - Interim Protection Orders 32. Power of Minister to make interim protection orders 33. Terms of interim protection orders 34. Notice of order to landholder 35. Recommendation by Resource Planning and Development Commission 36. Notice to comply 37. Notification to other Ministers 38. Limitation of licences, permits, &c., issued under other Acts 39. -
Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP
Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania Record 1997/04 Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP A Co-operatively Formulated Plan by Government Agencies, Statutory Bodies and Relevant Land Users for the Mt Read RAP SUMMARY The formulation of this plan by a co-operative committee, comprising representatives from Government Agencies, statutory bodies and relevant land users, is a ‘first’ for Tasmania. The effort by these various parties with an interest in the Mt Read area demonstrates the commitment to protect the area in the absence of any formal reserve. The Mt Read RAP is almost entirely covered by two current mining leases, ML7M/91 over the Henty gold deposit and ML28M/93 associated with the Rosebery silver-lead-zinc mine, and exploration licence EL5/96 held by Renison Limited. The RAP is within the Mt Read Strategic Prospectivity Zone, which means that if the status of the land is changed and this effectively prevents activities on the current mining tenements, then compensation may be payable. The vegetation around Lake Johnston is acknowledged as having exceptionally high conservation and scientific values, which is why a management plan for the area was written in 1992 and adopted by the lessee. There is a need to expand the scope of the previous plan so that all users of the Mt Read area are aware of the need to abide by measures to protect the vegetation. In addition, media reports have generated much interest in the ancient stands of Huon pine growing in one part of the Mt Read RAP. Studies indicate that the existing Huon pine on the site comprises one or a few individuals which may have vegetatively reproduced on the site since the last glaciation. -
South, Tasmania
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. -
Conservation Assessment of Future Potential Production Forest Land (FPPF Land)
Attachment 1 Conservation Assessment of Future Potential Production Forest land (FPPF land) A REPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE GROWTH Natural and Cultural Heritage Division DPIPWE Executive summary................. .................................................................. 3 Introduction .. ........................................................................................... 4 Method .................................................................................................... 5 Natural Values (Flora and Fauna) ........ ....... ...... ............ ...... ............ ....... ...... ....... 6 Heritage Tasmania ...... ....... ...... ............ ...... ............ ....... ...... ............ ....... ...... ....... 7 Aboriginal Heritage ...... ....... ...... ............ ...... ............ ....... ...... ............ ....... ...... ....... 7 Constraints and Potential Causes of Error ............. ....... ...... ........... ................... .. 7 Results and Discussion ............................................................................. 8 Natural Values (Flora and Fauna) ........ ....... ...... ............ ...... ............ ....... ...... ..... .. 8 Th reatened Flora ......... ....... ...... ............ ....... ...... ............ ...... ............ ....... ...... ....... 8 Th reatened Fauna ....... ....... ...... ............ ...... ............ ....... ...... ............ ....... ...... ....... 9 Heritage Tasmania ...... ....... ...... ............ ...... ................... ...... .................. -
Forest to Fjaeldmark: Rainforest and Related Scrub
Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Rainforest and related scrub Eucryphia lucida Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark (revised – May 2018) 1 Rainforest and related scrub Community (Code) Page Athrotaxis cupressoides-Nothofagus gunnii short rainforest (RPF) 10 Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland (RPW) 12 Athrotaxis cupressoides rainforest (RPP) 15 Athrotaxis selaginoides-Nothofagus gunnii short rainforest (RKF) 17 Athrotaxis selaginoides rainforest (RKP) 19 Athrotaxis selaginoides subalpine scrub (RKS) 21 Coastal rainforest (RCO) 23 Highland low rainforest and scrub (RSH) 25 Highland rainforest scrub with dead Athrotaxis selaginoides (RKX) 27 Lagarostrobos franklinii rainforest and scrub (RHP) 29 Nothofagus-Atherosperma rainforest (RMT) 31 Nothofagus-Leptospermum short rainforest (RML) 34 Nothofagus-Phyllocladus short rainforest (RMS) 36 Nothofagus gunnii rainforest scrub (RFS) 39 Nothofagus rainforest (undifferentiated) (RMU) 41 Rainforest fernland (RFE) 42 General description Diselma archeri and/or Pherosphaera hookeriana. These are mapped within the unit Highland This group comprises most Tasmanian vegetation coniferous shrubland (HCS), which is included within dominated by Tasmanian rainforest species (sensu the Highland treeless vegetation section. Jarman and Brown 1983) regardless of whether the dominant species are trees, shrubs or ferns. Rainforests and related scrub vegetation generally Tasmanian cool temperate rainforest has been occur in high rainfall areas of Tasmania that exceed defined floristically -
The City of Melbourne's Future Urban Forest
TheThe CitCityy ofof Melbourne’sMelbourne’s 5dcdaTDaQP]5^aTbc5dcdaTDaQP]5^aTbc Identifying vulnerability to future temperatures Authors: Dave Kendal, Jess Baumann Burnley Campus School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences The University of Melbourne 500 Yarra Boulevard VIC 3010 AUSTRALIA T: +61 3 8344 0267 Contact: [email protected] Epert advice from Stephen Frank, Steve Livesley, Peter Symes, Anna Foley, David Reid, Peter May, Ian Shears and David Callow. First printed June 2016. Published online November 2016 by the Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub: http:// www.nespurban.edu.au/publications-resources/research-reports/ CAULRR02_CoMFutureUrbanForest_Nov2016.pdf The Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub is funded under the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Programme with a mission to take a comprehensive view of the sustainability and liveability of urban environments. © The City of Melbourne 2016. Executive Summary Climate change is likely to have a significant effect on many trees in the City of Melbourne. Some species will perform better, while some will perform worse. The report describes the results of a project exploring the vulnerability of tree species currently planted in the City of Melbourne, and identifies some potential new species that may be more suitable for the City’s climate futures. A list of species combining those currently in the City of Melbourne’s urban forest with those being newly planted in the City of Melbourne was created. The global locations where species occur naturally and are in cultivation (and abundance where available) were compiled from existing datasets, such as ‘open data’ tree inventories and extracted from other published data, from approximately 200 cities around the world. -
Threatened Plant Species in Your Bush About This Kit This Kit Is Designed to Help You Identify Any Threatened Species That May Be Present in Your Remnant Native Bush
Threatened plant species in your bush About this kit This kit is designed to help you identify any threatened species that may be present in your remnant native bush. After a brief introduction about threatened species and their importance, the kit lists most of the plants that are thought to be extinct, endangered or vulnerable in Tasmania. The plants are listed alphabetically by their scientific name. A short description and a photograph are given for each species. Information on managing the species is also given where this is known — though in most cases this information is not currently available. An alphabetical list of the common names of the plants included in this kit can be found on page 41. Further information about threatened plant species can be obtained from the Threatened Species Unit botanist on (03) 6233 6556. What is a threatened species? A plant or animal species is described as threatened if it is at risk of becoming extinct. Plants and animals become threatened through a range of factors that may be natural or human induced. A plant population may be destroyed by fire, flood or disease, or by land clearance for development or agriculture. Some Tasmanian plant species are highly localised and therefore more vulnerable to destruction. By far the biggest threat to Tasmania’s wildlife is the loss of habitat through development and land practices such as forestry and agriculture. In Tasmania threatened species are categorised into three classes depending on the level of threat facing them. These are endangered (including extinct), vulnerable and rare. All species assigned to these classes are included in the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995. -
Environmental Adaptation in Stomatal Size Independent of the Effects of Genome Size
Research Environmental adaptation in stomatal size independent of the effects of genome size Gregory J. Jordan1, Raymond J. Carpenter1,2, Anthony Koutoulis1, Aina Price1 and Timothy J. Brodribb1 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; 2School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Benham Bldg DX 650 312, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia Summary Author for correspondence: Cell sizes are linked across multiple tissues, including stomata, and this variation is closely Gregory J. Jordan correlated with genome size. These associations raise the question of whether generic Tel: + 61 362267237 changes in cell size cause suboptimal changes in stomata, requiring subsequent evolution Email: [email protected] under selection for stomatal size. Received: 9 June 2014 We tested the relationships among guard cell length, genome size and vegetation type Accepted: 20 August 2014 using phylogenetically independent analyses on 67 species of the ecologically and structurally diverse family, Proteaceae. We also compared how genome and stomatal sizes varied at New Phytologist (2015) 205: 608–617 ancient (among genera) and more recent (within genus) levels. doi: 10.1111/nph.13076 The observed 60-fold range in genome size in Proteaceae largely reflected the mean chro- mosome size. Compared with variation among genera, genome size varied much less within Key words: adaptation, cell size, genera (< 6% of total variance) than stomatal size, implying evolution in stomatal size chromosome size, CO2, genome size, subsequent to changes in genome size. Open vegetation and closed forest had significantly palaeoproxy, Proteaceae, stomata. different relationships between stomatal and genome sizes. -
Management of the Flora of the Mt Read RAP
I~) Management of the flora of the Mt Read RAP byCABACON CONTENTS Introduction 2 Acknowledgements ............................................. '" ................. , ........ 2 Curient Tenure .................................. .. ... ........................................... 2 Existing Rights ................................................................................... 2 Access 2 Visitors 2 Permission to Visit Leases .................... , ........•...............••.................. , ... ... ••. 2 Existing Controls .......................................................................... , ... ... ... 2 ML 7M/91 .......................................................................... , ... ... ... 2 ML33M189 4 RAP Status 4 Vegetation ................................... , ............................................ , ... ... ... 4 Vegetation Studies .......................... , ............................................ , ... ... ... 5 Sampling Limits .................................................................... , ... ... ... 5 Data Collection and Floristic Classification ........................... '" .............. , ... ... ... 5 Plant Communities .......................................................... .. ... ... ... ... ... 5 CailidendrouslThamnic Nothofagus cunninghamii Rainforest .............................. 6 Tbamnic Athrotaxis selaginoides Rainforest '" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 6 Implicate Conifer Rainforest ........ , ....... , ......................... '" .......