DOCSLIB.ORG

The Year in Elections, 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 THE WORLD’S FLAWED AND FAILED CONTESTS Pippa Norris, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martínez i Coma February 2014 THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM The Electoral Integrity Project Department of Government and International Relations Merewether Building, HO4 University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Phone: +61(2) 9351 6041 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com Copyright © Pippa Norris, Ferran Martínez i Coma, and Richard W. Frank 2014. All rights reserved. Photo credits Cover photo: ‘Ballot for national election.’ by Daniel Littlewood, http://www.flickr.com/photos/daniellittlewood/413339945. Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 6 and 18: ‘Ballot sections are separated for counting.’ by Brittany Danisch, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bdanisch/6084970163/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 8: ‘Women in Pakistan wait to vote’ by DFID - UK Department for International Development, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8735821208/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 14: ‘Buena participación’ by Gabriel Flores Romero, http://www.flickr.com/photos/gabofr/7482482958/in/set- 72157630320052078. Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Printed and bound in Sydney, Australia. ISBN-10: 0646918222 ISBN-13: 978-0-646-91822-8 1 Page THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM Contents 1.Executive summary _________________________________________________________________________ 5 2. Introduction ______________________________________________________________________________ 6 3. The design of the survey ____________________________________________________________________ 7 The concept of electoral integrity ___________________________________________________________ 7 Measuring electoral integrity ______________________________________________________________ 7 The Electoral Integrity Project______________________________________________________________ 7 Election coverage _______________________________________________________________________ 7 Experts ________________________________________________________________________________ 7 Time-period ____________________________________________________________________________ 8 Confidence intervals _____________________________________________________________________ 8 Download the PEI_2 datase _______________________________________________________________ 8 4. Summary of results ________________________________________________________________________ 9 Figure 1: The Perceptions of Electoral Integrity index (PEI) _______________________________________ 9 High integrity contests___________________________________________________________________ 10 Figure 2: PEI, democracy and development _________________________________________________ 10 Moderate integrity elections ______________________________________________________________ 11 Low integrity elections __________________________________________________________________ 11 World regions _________________________________________________________________________ 11 Figure 3: PEI by world region______________________________________________________________ 12 Figure 4: The world map of electoral integrity ________________________________________________ 12 Major problems during the electoral cycle ___________________________________________________ 12 Figure 5: The PEI electoral cycle ___________________________________________________________ 13 Figure 6: Performance of each stage during the electoral cycle___________________________________ 13 Looking Ahead _________________________________________________________________________ 14 Table 1: Summary results by election _______________________________________________________ 15 Table 2: Summary of results by global region _________________________________________________ 18 Table 3: Summary of indicators by types of regimes ___________________________________________ 18 5. Results by election ________________________________________________________________________ 19 Albania _______________________________________________________________________________ 20 Angola _______________________________________________________________________________ 21 Argentina _____________________________________________________________________________ 22 Armenia ______________________________________________________________________________ 23 Australia______________________________________________________________________________ 24 Austria _______________________________________________________________________________ 25 2 Azerbaijan ____________________________________________________________________________ 26 Page THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM Barbados _____________________________________________________________________________ 27 Belarus _______________________________________________________________________________ 28 Bhutan _______________________________________________________________________________ 29 Bulgaria ______________________________________________________________________________ 30 Burkina Faso __________________________________________________________________________ 31 Cambodia ____________________________________________________________________________ 32 Cameroon ____________________________________________________________________________ 33 Chile _________________________________________________________________________________ 34 Congo, Republic of _____________________________________________________________________ 35 Cuba _________________________________________________________________________________ 36 Cyprus _______________________________________________________________________________ 37 Czech Republic ________________________________________________________________________ 38 Czech Republic ________________________________________________________________________ 39 Czech Republic ________________________________________________________________________ 40 Djibouti ______________________________________________________________________________ 41 Ecuador ______________________________________________________________________________ 42 Equatorial Guinea ______________________________________________________________________ 43 Georgia ______________________________________________________________________________ 44 Georgia ______________________________________________________________________________ 45 Germany _____________________________________________________________________________ 46 Ghana _______________________________________________________________________________ 47 Grenada ______________________________________________________________________________ 48 Guinea _______________________________________________________________________________ 49 Honduras _____________________________________________________________________________ 50 Iceland _______________________________________________________________________________ 51 Iran __________________________________________________________________________________ 52 Israel ________________________________________________________________________________ 53 Italy _________________________________________________________________________________ 54 Japan ________________________________________________________________________________ 55 Japan ________________________________________________________________________________ 56 Jordan _______________________________________________________________________________ 57 Kenya ________________________________________________________________________________ 58 Korea, Republic of ______________________________________________________________________ 59 Kuwait _______________________________________________________________________________ 60 Kuwait _______________________________________________________________________________ 61 3 Lithuania _____________________________________________________________________________ 62 Page THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM Madagascar ___________________________________________________________________________ 63 Malaysia______________________________________________________________________________ 64 Maldives _____________________________________________________________________________ 65 Mali _________________________________________________________________________________ 66 Malta ________________________________________________________________________________ 67 Mauritania ____________________________________________________________________________ 68 Mexico _______________________________________________________________________________ 69 Micronesia, Federated States _____________________________________________________________ 70 Mongolia _____________________________________________________________________________ 71 Montenegro __________________________________________________________________________ 72 Montenegro __________________________________________________________________________ 73 Nepal ________________________________________________________________________________ 74 Netherlands ___________________________________________________________________________ 75 Norway ______________________________________________________________________________ 76 Pakistan ______________________________________________________________________________ 77 Paraguay _____________________________________________________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Populists in Power Around the World | Institute for Global Change

    Populists in Power Around the World | Institute for Global Change

    Populists in Power Around the World JORDAN KYLE RENEWING LIMOR GULTCHIN THE CENTRE Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 The Trouble With Defining opulismP 9 Two Essential Features of Populism 12 Types of Populism 21 Cases of Populism in Power 26 Populism Trends Around the World 32 Conclusion 44 Appendix: Methodology 45 Downloaded from http://institute.global/insight/ renewing-centre/populists-power-around-world on November 7 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXE CUTIVE SUMMARY Populism is dramatically shifting the global political landscape. This report defines populism and identifies its global prevalence by introducing a global database “Populists in Power: 1990–2018”. Only with a clear and systematic understanding of the phenomenon of populism can political leaders begin to offer meaningful and credible alternatives. This report sets out to define populism from a global perspective and identify some of its key trends since 1990. Populism contains two primary claims: • A country’s ‘true people’ are locked into conflict with outsiders, including establishment elites. • Nothing should constrain the will of the true people. Although populism always shares these two essential claims, it can take on widely varying forms across contexts. This report identifies three types of populism, distinguished by how populist leaders frame the conflict between the ‘true people’ and outsiders: • Cultural populism claims that the true people are the native members of the nation-state, and outsiders can include immigrants, criminals, ethnic and religious minorities, and cosmopolitan elites. Cultural populism tends to emphasise 3 religious traditionalism, law and order, sovereignty, and painting migrants as enemies. • Socio-economic populism claims that the true people are honest, hard-working members of the working class, and outsiders can include big business, capital owners and actors perceived as propping up an international capitalist system.
  • The Year in Elections, 2013: the World's Flawed and Failed Contests

    The Year in Elections, 2013: the World's Flawed and Failed Contests

    The Year in Elections, 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Norris, Pippa, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martinez i Coma. 2014. The Year in Elections 2013: The World's Flawed and Failed Contests. The Electoral Integrity Project. Published Version http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11744445 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 THE WORLD’S FLAWED AND FAILED CONTESTS Pippa Norris, Richard W. Frank, and Ferran Martínez i Coma February 2014 THE YEAR IN ELECTIONS, 2013 WWW. ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM The Electoral Integrity Project Department of Government and International Relations Merewether Building, HO4 University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Phone: +61(2) 9351 6041 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com Copyright © Pippa Norris, Ferran Martínez i Coma, and Richard W. Frank 2014. All rights reserved. Photo credits Cover photo: ‘Ballot for national election.’ by Daniel Littlewood, http://www.flickr.com/photos/daniellittlewood/413339945. Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 6 and 18: ‘Ballot sections are separated for counting.’ by Brittany Danisch, http://www.flickr.com/photos/bdanisch/6084970163/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. Page 8: ‘Women in Pakistan wait to vote’ by DFID - UK Department for International Development, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8735821208/ Licence at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0.
  • 2021 Year Ahead

    2021 Year Ahead

    2021 YEAR AHEAD Claudio Brocado Anthony Brocado January 29, 2021 1 2020 turned out to be quite unusual. What may the year ahead and beyond bring? As the year got started, the consensus was that a strong 2019 for equities would be followed by a positive first half, after which meaningful volatility would kick in due to the US presidential election. In the spirit of our prefer- ence for a contrarian stance, we had expected somewhat the opposite: some profit-taking in the first half of 2020, followed by a rally that would result in a positive balance at year-end. But in the way of the markets – which always tend to catch the largest number of participants off guard – we had what some would argue was one of the strangest years in recent memory. 2 2020 turned out to be a very eventful year. The global virus crisis (GVC) brought about by the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic was something no serious market observer had anticipated as 2020 got started. Volatility had been all but nonexistent early in what we call ‘the new 20s’, which had led us to expect the few remaining volatile asset classes, such as cryptocurrencies, to benefit from the search for more extreme price swings. We had expected volatilities across asset classes to show some convergence. The markets delivered, but not in the direction we had expected. Volatilities surged higher across many assets, with the CBOE volatility index (VIX) reaching some of the highest readings in many years. As it became clear that what was commonly called the novel coronavirus would bring about a pandemic as it spread to the remotest corners of the world at record speeds, the markets feared the worst.
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr

    The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr

    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
  • Review-Chronicle of Human Violations in Belarus in 2009

    Review-Chronicle of Human Violations in Belarus in 2009

    The Human Rights Center Viasna Review-Chronicle of Human Violations in Belarus in 2009 Minsk 2010 Contents A year of disappointed hopes ................................................................7 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in January 2009....................................................................9 Freedom to peaceful assemblies .................................................................................10 Activities of security services .....................................................................................11 Freedom of association ...............................................................................................12 Freedom of information ..............................................................................................13 Harassment of civil and political activists ..................................................................14 Politically motivated criminal cases ...........................................................................14 Freedom of conscience ...............................................................................................15 Prisoners’ rights ..........................................................................................................16 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in February 2009................................................................17 Politically motivated criminal cases ...........................................................................19 Harassment of
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Outsider Politics: Radicalism

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Outsider Politics: Radicalism

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Outsider politics : Radicalism as a Political Strategy in Western Europe and Latin America A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Verónica Hoyo Committee in charge: Professor William Chandler, Chair Professor Matthew Shugart, Co-Chair Professor Akos Rona-Tas Professor Sebastian Saiegh Professor Kaare Strom 2010 Copyright Verónica Hoyo, 2010 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Verónica Hoyo is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION A mis padres, Irma y Gonzalo, y a mi hermana Irma. Gracias por ser fuente constante de amor, inspiración y apoyo incondicional. Esto nunca hubiera sido posible sin ustedes. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page.............................................................................................................. iii Dedication..................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents.......................................................................................................... v List of Abbreviations...................................................................................................... vi List of Tables................................................................................................................... xii List of Graphs................................................................................................................
  • Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in November 2009 in Belarus November Started with the Population's Pani

    Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in November 2009 in Belarus November Started with the Population's Pani

    Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in November 2009 In Belarus November started with the population’s panic caused by the epidemic of an acute virus disease that often brought such complication as pneumonia. Though the World Health Organization declared a swine influenza pandemic, on 1 November the deputy minister of health Valiantsina Kachan stated that there was no swine flu in Belarus, irrespective of the fact that tests for swine flu were carried out only in severe cases or after the death of patients. Everybody was well aware that one could die of pneumonia and the medical institutions were overcrowded. However, there was no information about the number of deaths and hospitalizations in Belarus, as the Belarusian officials kept silence. For several day the people bought up all antivirus medicines, masks, etc. Only on 6 November, after an avalanche of alarming news in independent media and internet, the authorities announced holding additional anti-epidemic actions in Minsk and closed educational establishments for quarantine. On the other hand, on 4 November the first deputy minister of information Liliya Ananich stated the ministry ‘will stop any attempts to misinform the population of the country’. The same day Valiantsina Kachan voiced the data from which it followed that 19 people died of pneumonia during the two last weeks. All of them were tested for swine flu and in seven cases the tests were positive. This was all official information. Meanwhile, for 2-29 November 170 819 cases of swine flu and acute respiratory viral infection were registered in Homel oblast alone.
  • Civil Liberties: 3 Aggregate Score: 60 Freedom Rating: 3.0 Overview

    Civil Liberties: 3 Aggregate Score: 60 Freedom Rating: 3.0 Overview

    Ecuador Page 1 of 7 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Ecuador Ecuador Country: Ecuador Year: 2018 Freedom Status: Partly Free Political Rights: 3 Civil Liberties: 3 Aggregate Score: 60 Freedom Rating: 3.0 Overview: Elections take place regularly, though there are persistent concerns about politicization of the National Electoral Council (NEC). A leftist government has ruled the country since 2007. While former president Rafael Correa imposed restrictions on the media and civil society, a new administration that came to power in 2017 has begun rolling back repressive Correa-era policies. Ratings Change: Ecuador's civil liberties rating improved from 4 to 3, and it received an upward trend arrow, due to reduced pressure on the media and civil society, as well as progress on anticorruption efforts, under newly elected president Lenín Moreno. Political Rights and Civil Liberties: POLITICAL RIGHTS: 25 / 40 (+1) A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 7 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 3 / 4 https://freedomhouse.org/print/49986 9/27/2018 Ecuador Page 2 of 7 The 2008 constitution provides for a directly elected president. The president has the authority to dissolve the legislature once in his term, which triggers new elections for both the assembly and the presidency, and to veto individual line items in legislation. In April 2017, Lenín Moreno of PAIS won the presidential runoff with 51 percent of the vote, defeating Guillermo Lasso of the Creating Opportunities–Society United for More Action (CREO-SUMA) alliance, who took 49 percent.
  • Review–Chronicle

    Review–Chronicle

    REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 Human Rights Center Viasna ReviewChronicle » of the Human Rights Violations in Belarus in 2005 VIASNA « Human Rights Center Minsk 2006 1 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 » VIASNA « Human Rights Center 2 Human Rights Center Viasna, 2006 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 INTRODUCTION: main trends and generalizations The year of 2005 was marked by a considerable aggravation of the general situation in the field of human rights in Belarus. It was not only political rights » that were violated but social, economic and cultural rights as well. These viola- tions are constant and conditioned by the authoritys voluntary policy, with Lu- kashenka at its head. At the same time, human rights violations are not merely VIASNA a side-effect of the authoritarian state control; they are deliberately used as a « means of eradicating political opponents and creating an atmosphere of intimi- dation in the society. The negative dynamics is characterized by the growth of the number of victims of human rights violations and discrimination. Under these circums- tances, with a high level of latent violations and concealed facts, with great obstacles to human rights activity and overall fear in the society, the growth points to drastic stiffening of the regimes methods. Apart from the growing number of registered violations, one should men- Human Rights Center tion the increase of their new forms, caused in most cases by the development of the state oppressive machine, the expansion of legal restrictions and ad- ministrative control over social life and individuals.
  • NGO Sustainability Index USAID

    NGO Sustainability Index USAID

    2009 NGO SUSTAINABILITY INDEX for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia 13th Edition – June 2010 Cover Photo: Volunteers work to preserve the Lietava castle in Slovakia during the project Naša Žilina (Our Žilina), an effort to which nearly 200 corporate volunteers contributed. Photo Credit: Pontis Foundation The 2009 NGO Sustainability Index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia Developed by: United States Agency for International Development Bureau for Europe and Eurasia Office of Democracy, Governance and Social Transition 2009 NGO SUSTAINABILITY INDEX SCORES COUNTRY Legal Service Viability Capacity Financial Financial Provision Advocacy Environment Public Image Overall Score Infrastructure Organizational Organizational NORTHERN TIER Czech Republic 3.0 3.0 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.5 2.7 Estonia 1.7 2.3 2.4 1.8 2.3 1.6 1.9 2.0 Hungary 1.7 3.0 3.6 3.1 2.6 2.2 3.3 2.8 Latvia 2.4 3.0 3.3 2.2 2.5 2.4 3.3 2.7 Lithuania 2.2 2.9 3.0 2.1 3.5 3.0 2.9 2.8 Poland 2.2 2.6 2.7 1.8 2.2 1.7 2.2 2.2 Slovakia 2.8 3.0 3.3 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.7 Slovenia 3.5 3.9 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.8 Average 2.4 3.0 3.2 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.8 2.7 SOUTHERN TIER Albania 3.8 3.9 4.6 3.4 3.7 4 3.8 3.9 Bosnia 3.4 3.4 4.8 3.1 4 3.9 3.3 3.7 Bulgaria 2.0 4.3 4.4 2.6 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.2 Croatia 2.8 3 4.1 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.9 3.1 Kosovo 3.5 3.7 4.8 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.7 3.9 Macedonia 3.2 3.7 4.5 3.2 3.8 3.2 3.9 3.6 Montenegro 3.6 4.4 4.9 3.5 4.0 3.9 4.4 4.1 Romania 3.5 3.5 4.2 3.4 3.1 3.2 3.7 3.5 Serbia 4.4 4.2 5.3 3.8 4.3 3.7 4.6 4.3 Average 3.4 3.8 4.6 3.3 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.7 EURASIA: Russia, West NIS, and
  • Ecuador in Times of Alianza PAIS

    Ecuador in Times of Alianza PAIS

    European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe No. 108 (2019): July-December, pp. 193-220 www.erlacs.org Political economy of state-indigenous liaisons: Ecuador in times of Alianza PAIS Rickard Lalander Södertörn University Magnus Lembke Stockholm University Pablo Ospina Peralta Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar Abstract This article analyses the contentious liaisons between the indigenous movement and the state in Ecuador during the government of Alianza PAIS under the presidency of Rafael Correa (2007-2017). The research question examines to which measure, how and why the shift from neoliberal to leftist administrations could have affected the principal strategic repertoire of the indigenous movement. Leaning on a political economy approach and social movement theorizing, and accentuating the relative power balance between the indigenous movement and the state, it focuses on indigenous oppositional strategies and the ambivalent attitude of the state regarding participatory democracy and the rights of the indigenous peo- ples. By contrasting this period with the neoliberal 1990s – considered the heyday of the indigenous struggle – we examine contemporary strategic responses of the movement amidst the new political setting characterized by hyper-presidentialism and a systematic effort to de-corporatize the state. A central finding is that, while retaining its powerful or- ganizational network which could be reactivated during critical situations, the indigenous movement weakened in relation to the 1990s. This relative decline is manifested in three types of social movement relationships: between leaders and grassroots (mobilizing capaci- ty); between the movement and its alliance partners (alliance politics); and between the movement and the legal institutional terrain of the state (institutional participation).
  • European and National Dimension in Research

    European and National Dimension in Research

    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION OF BELARUS Polotsk State University EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL DIMENSION IN RESEARCH HUMANITIES Electronic collected materials of IX Junior Researchers’ Conference (Novopolotsk, April 26–27, 2017) 26 Обновляется 1 раз в год Novopolotsk 2017 PUBLISHING BOARD: Prof. Dzmitry Lazouski ( chairperson ); Dr. Dzmitry Hlukhau (vice-chairperson ); Mr. Siarhei Piashkun ( vice-chairperson ); Dr. Maryia Putrava; Ms. Liudmila Slavinskaya РЕДАКЦИОННАЯ КОЛЛЕГИЯ : д-р техн . наук , проф . Д. Н. Лазовский ( председатель ); канд . техн . наук , доц . Д. О. Глухов ( зам . председателя ); С. В. Пешкун ( зам . председателя ); канд . филол . наук , доц . М. Д. Путрова ; Л. Н. Славинская EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL DIMENSION IN RESEARCH. HUMANITIES = ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЙ И НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ КОНТЕКСТЫ В НАУЧНЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯХ : Electronic collected materials of IX Junior Researchers’ Conference, Novopolotsk, April 26–27, 2017 / Polotsk State University ; ed. D. Lazouski [et al.]. – Novopolotsk, 2017. – 1 CD-ROM. Издается с 2017 года ( в печатном виде – с 2009 г.). Сборник включен в Государственный регистр информационного ресурса . Регистрационное свидетельство № 3991711555 от 17.04.2017 г. Первые два печатных издания вышли под заглавием « Материалы конференции молодых ученых », третье – « Национальный и европейский контексты в научных исследованиях » в 3 томах : «Гуманитарные науки », « Экономика » и « Технология ». В настоящем электронном сборнике « Европейский и национальный контексты в научных исследованиях . Гуманитарные науки » представлены работы молодых ученых