Cairo Supper Club Building 4015-4017 N
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Entablature Refers to the System of Moldings and Bands Which Lie Horizontally Above Columns, Resting on Their Capitals
An entablature refers to the system of moldings and bands which lie horizontally above columns, resting on their capitals. Considered to be major elements of classical architecture, entablatures are commonly divided into three parts: the architrave, frieze, and cornice. E ntablature by stromberg ARCHITRAVE The architrave is the supporting element, and the lowest of the three main parts of an entablature: the undecorated lintel resting on the columns. FRIEZE The frieze is the plain or decorated horizontal unmolded strip located between the cornice and the architrave. Clay Academy, Dallas, TX Stromberg offers you the freedom to choose. Whether your project requires authentic classical entablature, or a modern look, we will design your entablature to perfectly match your building’s unique style . We have extensive knowledge of all the major classical orders, including Ionic, Doric, and Corinthian, and we can craft columns and entablatures that comply with each order’s specifications. DORIC a continuous sculpted frieze and a The oldest and simplest of these three cornice. CORNICE orders of classical Greek architecture, Its delicate beauty and rich ornamentation typified by heavy, fluted columns with contrast with the stark unembellished The cornice is the upper plain capitals and no base. features of the Doric order. part of an entablature; a decorative molded IONIC CORINTHIAN projection at the top of a This order, considered to be a feminine The most ornate of the three classical wall or window. style, is distinguished by tall slim orders, characterized by a slender fluted columns with flutes resting on molded column having an ornate, bell-shaped bases and crowned by capitals in the capital decorated with acanthus leaves. -
Pittsfield Building 55 E
LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Pittsfield Building 55 E. Washington Preliminary Landmarkrecommendation approved by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, December 12, 2001 CITY OFCHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Departmentof Planning and Developement Alicia Mazur Berg, Commissioner Cover: On the right, the Pittsfield Building, as seen from Michigan Avenue, looking west. The Pittsfield Building's trademark is its interior lobbies and atrium, seen in the upper and lower left. In the center, an advertisement announcing the building's construction and leasing, c. 1927. Above: The Pittsfield Building, located at 55 E. Washington Street, is a 38-story steel-frame skyscraper with a rectangular 21-story base that covers the entire building lot-approximately 162 feet on Washington Street and 120 feet on Wabash Avenue. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. It is responsible for recommending to the City Council that individual buildings, sites, objects, or entire districts be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The Comm ission is staffed by the Chicago Department of Planning and Development, 33 N. LaSalle St., Room 1600, Chicago, IL 60602; (312-744-3200) phone; (312 744-2958) TTY; (312-744-9 140) fax; web site, http ://www.cityofchicago.org/ landmarks. This Preliminary Summary ofInformation is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation proceedings. Only language contained within the designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF INFORMATION SUBMITIED TO THE COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS IN DECEMBER 2001 PITTSFIELD BUILDING 55 E. -
OLD FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION Page 1 1. NAME of PROPERTY Historic Name
NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMBNo. 1024-0018 OLD FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Page 1 NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service_____________________________ National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: OLD FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Other Name/Site Number: The Downtown Presbyterian Church 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 154 Fifth Avenue North Not for publication: N/A City/Town: Nashville Vicinity: N/A State: TN County: Davidson Code: 41 Zip Code: 37219 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Buildingfs): X Public-Local:__ District:__ Public-State:__ Site:__ Public-Federal: Structure: Object: Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 __ buildings sites structures objects 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: N/A NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 OLD FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service_____________________________________National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria. -
V I R G I N I a C O M M O N W E a L T H U N I V E R S I
VCU Campus Maps 50. (E-6) McAdams House, 914 W. Franklin St. 97. (A-10) VISSTA 4 Building, 1435 W. Main St. 39. (U-30) Pocahontas Building – VCU Computer Center, 900 E. Main St. 51. (C-9) Meeting Center, 101 N. Harrison St.* 98. (A-11) VISSTA 5 Building, 1401 W. Main St. 40. (R-30) Procurement Office, VCU, 10 S. 6th St.* 52. (D-5) Meredith House, 1014 W. Franklin St. 99. (F-4) Welcome Center, 1111 W. Broad St.* 41. (V-28) Putney House, Samuel, 1010 E. Marshall St. 53. (E-6) Millhiser Carriage House, 916 W. Franklin St. (Rear) 100. (H-7) West Grace Street Student Housing, 701 W. Grace St.* 42. (V-28) Putney House, Stephen, 1012 E. Marshall St. 54. (E-6) Millhiser House, 916 W. Franklin St. 101. (G-7) White House, 806 W. Franklin St. 43. (Y-29) Randolph Minor Hall, 301 College St.* 55. (D-8) Moseley House, 1001 Grove Ave. 102. (G-8) Williams House, 800 W. Franklin St. 44. (U-24) Recreation and Aquatic Center, 10th and Turpin streets* 56. (C-11) Oliver Hall-Physical Science Wing, 1001 W. Main St.* 103. (D-6) Younger House, 919 W. Franklin St. 45. (W-27) Richmond Academy of Medicine, 1200 E. Clay St.* 57. (C-12) Oliver Hall-School of Education, 1015 W. Main St.* 46. (U-25) Rudd Hall, 600 N. 10th St.* 58. (D-1) Parking, Bowe Street Deck, 609 Bowe St.* MCV Campus 47. (W-29) Sanger Hall, 1101 E. Marshall St.* 59. (F-4) Parking, West Broad Street Deck, 1111 W. -
Early Islamic Architecture in Iran
EARLY ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE IN IRAN (637-1059) ALIREZA ANISI Ph.D. THESIS THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH 2007 To My wife, and in memory of my parents Contents Preface...........................................................................................................iv List of Abbreviations.................................................................................vii List of Plates ................................................................................................ix List of Figures .............................................................................................xix Introduction .................................................................................................1 I Historical and Cultural Overview ..............................................5 II Legacy of Sasanian Architecture ...............................................49 III Major Feature of Architecture and Construction ................72 IV Decoration and Inscriptions .....................................................114 Conclusion .................................................................................................137 Catalogue of Monuments ......................................................................143 Bibliography .............................................................................................353 iii PREFACE It is a pleasure to mention the help that I have received in writing this thesis. Undoubtedly, it was my great fortune that I benefited from the supervision of Robert Hillenbrand, whose comments, -
The Five Orders of Architecture
BY GìAGOMO F5ARe)ZZji OF 2o ^0 THE FIVE ORDERS OF AECHITECTURE BY GIACOMO BAROZZI OF TIGNOLA TRANSLATED BY TOMMASO JUGLARIS and WARREN LOCKE CorYRIGHT, 1889 GEHY CENTER UK^^i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/fiveordersofarchOOvign A SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF GIACOMO BAEOZZI OF TIGNOLA. Giacomo Barozzi was born on the 1st of October, 1507, in Vignola, near Modena, Italy. He was orphaned at an early age. His mother's family, seeing his talents, sent him to an art school in Bologna, where he distinguished himself in drawing and by the invention of a method of perspective. To perfect himself in his art he went to Eome, studying and measuring all the ancient monuments there. For this achievement he received the honors of the Academy of Architecture in Eome, then under the direction of Marcello Cervini, afterward Pope. In 1537 he went to France with Abbé Primaticcio, who was in the service of Francis I. Barozzi was presented to this magnificent monarch and received a commission to build a palace, which, however, on account of war, was not built. At this time he de- signed the plan and perspective of Fontainebleau castle, a room of which was decorated by Primaticcio. He also reproduced in metal, with his own hands, several antique statues. Called back to Bologna by Count Pepoli, president of St. Petronio, he was given charge of the construction of that cathedral until 1550. During this time he designed many GIACOMO BAROZZr OF VIGNOLA. 3 other buildings, among which we name the palace of Count Isolani in Minerbio, the porch and front of the custom house, and the completion of the locks of the canal to Bologna. -
A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Motor Row, Chicago, Illinois Street
NFS Form 10-900-b OMR..Np. 1024-0018 (March 1992) / ~^"~^--.~.. United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / / v*jf f ft , I I / / National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form /..//^' -A o C_>- f * f / *•• This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. x New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Motor Row, Chicago, Illinois B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Dealerships and the Development of a Commercial District 1905-1936 Evolution of a Building Type 1905-1936 Motor Row and Chicago Architects 1905-1936 C. Form Prepared by name/title _____Linda Peters. Architectural Historian______________________ street & number 435 8. Cleveland Avenue telephone 847.506.0754 city or town ___Arlington Heights________________state IL zip code 60005 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. -
Restoration of a Vintage Limestone Portico with Architectural Precast Concrete
PROJECT CASE STUDY Restoration of a Vintage Limestone Portico with Architectural Precast Concrete Presents a case study on the use of architectural precast concrete as a cost-effective approach to restore an historic park facility in Chicago, Illinois. The main entrance portico of the facility was originally constructed with an elaborate limestone beam or entablature, carried by massive limestone columns. The carved limestone architrave (soffit), frieze, and cornice (upper projection) pieces of the entablature were attached to backup brickwork and concealed steel lintel beams with metal anchors. After significant stone damage and movements occurred due to long-term corrosion of embedded steel components, several David B. Tigue, P.E., S.E. limestone soffit pieces were removed from the building for safety. Associate, Senior Project Engineer The restoration design utilized architectural precast concrete with a Raths, Raths & Johnson, Inc. Willowbrook, Illinois formed soffit having the identical proportions, texture and color as the damaged architrave stone pieces, and had structural capacity to replace the existing steel lintel beams. The design provided a unique, cost-effective approach for replacing deteriorated and damaged components, while retaining the original, intricate limestone carvings. he Douglas Park Field House stone pillars supporting an elaborate is one of many vintage facili- limestone beam, or entablature, and a Tties managed by the Chicago roof structure over the entry portico Park District in Chicago, Illinois. Con- (see Fig. 1). The limestone entablature structed in the early 1900s, it is cur- construction consisted of traditional rently listed in the National Registry carved limestone architrave (soffit), Kurt R. Hoigard, P.E. of Historic Buildings. -
Aws Edition 1, 2009
Appendix B WS Edition 1, 2009 - [WI WebDoc [10/09]] A 6 Interior and Exterior Millwork © 2009, AWI, AWMAC, WI - Architectural Woodwork Standards - 1st Edition, October 1, 2009 B (Appendix B is not part of the AWS for compliance purposes) 481 Appendix B 6 - Interior and Exterior Millwork METHODS OF PRODUCTION Flat Surfaces: • Sawing - This produces relatively rough surfaces that are not utilized for architectural woodwork except where a “rough sawn” texture or nish is desired for design purposes. To achieve the smooth surfaces generally required, the rough sawn boards are further surfaced by the following methods: • Planing - Sawn lumber is passed through a planer or jointer, which has a revolving head with projecting knives, removing a thin layer of wood to produce a relatively smooth surface. • Abrasive Planing - Sawn lumber is passed through a powerful belt sander with tough, coarse belts, which remove the rough top surface. Moulded Surfaces: Sawn lumber is passed through a moulder or shaper that has knives ground to a pattern which produces the moulded pro[le desired. SMOOTHNESS OF FLAT AND MOULDED SURFACES Planers and Moulders: The smoothness of surfaces which have been machine planed or moulded is determined by the closeness of the knife cuts. The closer the cuts to each other (i.e., the more knife cuts per inch [KCPI]) the closer the ridges, and therefore the WS Edition 1, 2009 - [WI WebDoc [10/09]] smoother the resulting appearance. A Sanding and Abrasives: Surfaces can be further smoothed by sanding. Sandpapers come in grits from coarse to [ne and are assigned ascending grit numbers. -
National Register of Historic Places Inventory — Nomination Form Date Entered 1. Name 2. Location 3. Classification 4. Owner O
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places Inventory — Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries — complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Dubuque County Jail ______________ and or common 2. Location street & number 36 East 8th Street not for publication city, town Dubuque vicinity of Congressional District: Second state Iowa code IA county Dubuque code 061 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X public X occupied agriculture museum X building(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress X educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted X government scientific being considered - yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military __ other: 4. Owner of Property name Dubuque County (Contact: Donna Smith, Chairman, Cmmt-y Board of Supervisors') street & number 720 Central AVenue city, town Dubuque vicinity of state Ibwa 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Dubuque County Courthouse street & number 720 Central Avenue city, town state 6. Representation in Existing Surveys __________ Historic American Buildings Survey; Iowa Windshield Survey; Dubuque Historic Sites Field Survey; National Register of Historic has this property been determined eligible? —— yes —— no Places date 1967, 1977; 1974; 1973. 1972 L federal X_ state __ county X_ local Library of Congress; State Historical Society of Iowa; depository for survey records National Park Service ________ Districtof Columbia; Iowa city, town ; T)p..«=i Mm'TIPS; Waghingtrm state^District of Columbia 7. -
The Art of Architecture
LEARNING TO LOOK AT ARCHITECTURE LOOK: Allow yourself to take the time to slow down and look carefully. OBSERVE: Observation is an active process, requiring both time and attention. It is here that the viewer begins to build up a mental catalogue of the building’s You spend time in buildings every day. But how often visual elements. do you really look at or think about their design, their details, and the spaces they create? What did the SEE: Looking is a physical act; seeing is a mental process of perception. Seeing involves recognizing or connecting the information the eyes take in architect want you to feel or think once inside the with your previous knowledge and experiences in order to create meaning. structure? Following the steps in TMA’s Art of Seeing Art™* process can help you explore architecture on DESCRIBE: Describing can help you to identify and organize your thoughts about what you have seen. It may be helpful to think of describing as taking a deeper level through close looking. a careful inventory. ANALYZE: Analysis uses the details you identified in your descriptions and LOOK INTERPRET applies reason to make meaning. Once details have been absorbed, you’re ready to analyze what you’re seeing through these four lenses: OBSERVE ANALYZE FORM SYMBOLS IDEAS MEANING SEE DESCRIBE INTERPRET: Interpretation, the final step in the Art of Seeing Art™ process, combines our descriptions and analysis with our previous knowledge and any information we have about the artist and the work—or in this case, * For more information on the Art of Seeing Art and visual literacy, the architect and the building. -
Etruscan and Early Roman Architecture Free
FREE ETRUSCAN AND EARLY ROMAN ARCHITECTURE PDF Axel Boethius | 264 pages | 25 Nov 1992 | Yale University Press | 9780300052909 | English | New Haven, United States Etruscan Architecture | Art History Summary. Periods and movements through time. The study of Etruscan and Early Roman Architecture architecture suffers greatly in comparison with its Greek and Roman counterparts because of the building materials used. Whereas Greek temples, such as Etruscan and Early Roman Architecture Parthenon in Athens, and Roman public buildings, such as the immense bath complex of Caracalla in Rome, immediately catch the attention and admiration of students and travelers, Etruscan architectural remains consist for the most part of underground tombs, foundation walls, models of huts and houses, and fragments of terracotta roof decoration. At the same time, thanks to the description by the Roman architectural historian Vitruvius Ten Books on Architecture 4. The perception of Etruscan architecture has, however, changed Etruscan and Early Roman Architecture since the advent of large-scale excavations Etruscan and Early Roman Architecture the late 19th century, and since the s new evidence has produced important results for our understanding of the architectural traditions in ancient Italy. The overviews on Etruscan architecture address very different kinds of audiences, and each has its own focus and strengths. Colonna and Donati are chapters in general books on the Etruscans for Italian as well as international readers, while Damgaard Andersen covers all aspects of early Etruscan architecture in a very systematic presentation. Barker and Rasmussen emphasizes the landscape of Etruria with accounts of excavations and remains, including architecture. A recent topic of discussion concerns the relationship between Etruscan architecture in general and the architectural traditions of ancient Rome.