DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Engagement for Onshore Wind Developments: Best Practice Guidance for England

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Community Engagement for Onshore Wind Developments: Best Practice Guidance for England © Crown copyright October 2014 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] URN: 14D/382 This document is also available from our website at www.gov.uk/decc. 2 Community Engagement for Onshore Wind Developments Best Practice Guidance for England Prepared by Regen SW for the Department of Energy and Climate Change 3 Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Ministerial Foreword ..................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 7 The opportunity ........................................................................................................................ 7 The reason ............................................................................................................................... 7 The audience ............................................................................................................................ 8 Using this guidance ................................................................................................................ 10 Principles of best practice .......................................................................................................... 13 For the developer: .................................................................................................................. 13 For local communities: ............................................................................................................ 13 For the local authority: ............................................................................................................ 13 What is best practice? ................................................................................................................ 16 Developers ............................................................................................................................. 16 Communities .......................................................................................................................... 17 Local authorities ..................................................................................................................... 18 Preparation phase guidance: ..................................................................................................... 19 Background ......................................................................................................................... 19 1. Site selection .................................................................................................................. 21 2. Preparing the engagement plan ...................................................................................... 22 3. Informing environmental studies ..................................................................................... 26 4. Scoping the community benefits package ....................................................................... 28 5. General pre-application consultation ............................................................................... 30 Planning phase guidance: .......................................................................................................... 31 6. Submission of a planning application .............................................................................. 31 Post-consent phase guidance: ................................................................................................... 34 7. Discharge of planning conditions and securing agreement on community benefits ........ 34 8. Tendering and use of local contractors ........................................................................... 37 9. Construction and grid connection.................................................................................... 38 Operational phase guidance: ..................................................................................................... 40 10. Commissioning and operation....................................................................................... 40 11. Decommissioning and repowering ................................................................................ 42 Related documents .................................................................................................................... 43 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 44 4 Ministerial Foreword Ministerial Foreword Communities hosting renewable energy play a vital role in meeting our national need for secure, clean energy and so it is important to foster the development of close and meaningful engagement between developers and local communities. The UK is facing an unprecedented energy challenge: we need to move from finite, high-carbon fossil fuels to clean, secure energy. Onshore wind has a key role to play in this future energy mix. Not only is it the cheapest form of large-scale renewable energy, which by 2020 is expected to power between 5.9m and 7m homes, it also has the potential to deliver significant benefits to local communities across the country. Whether by creating jobs and apprentices, funding local community projects and facilities or reducing electricity bills, onshore wind can make a real difference to local communities. The Coalition has been clear that the benefits of onshore wind projects must be shared with those communities hosting them. Seizing this opportunity requires ambition, innovation and commitment on all sides. Last year I was pleased to announce that the onshore wind industry, through its industry-wide community benefits protocol, had committed to a five-fold increase in the value of community benefit funds paid to local people. Now at a minimum level of £5,000 per MW per year, these funds are delivering millions of pounds worth of long-term investment to local communities. It is important however that we build on this commitment and assist communities and developers to work together to provide the types of benefits that local people truly want, in a way that is fair to all concerned and through a clear, transparent process. 5 Ministerial Foreword This guidance, drawn up in partnership between Government, community organisations and the onshore wind industry, sets out a typical development process and details when and where engagement fits within that. It also provides best practice and innovative examples to assist both developers and local communities in considering the best way to engage with one another, whilst recognising that every community is unique and no single approach fits all. Alongside this guide, I am also publishing new best practice guidance on community benefits and later this year we will launch a new Register of Community Benefits and Engagement to further help communities develop packages that are right for them. Furthermore, we have set up the Shared Ownership Taskforce to develop a framework to guide the offer of shared ownership to communities which is expected to be launched shortly. Taken together, this package is part of a step-change in the way that communities and onshore wind industry work in partnership, ensuring a future in which everyone is part of the renewable energy revolution. The Rt Hon Edward Davey 6 Introduction Introduction provide a better and more timely “Engagement is a two way consideration of the material benefits and impacts of the proposal, which is reflected process of openly sharing and in the decision-making process; and exchanging information, ensure that, if the proposal goes ahead, understanding different views, local people have the opportunity to shape listening and responding to how the development is actually realised suggestions, developing trust and and build an ongoing relationship with the dialogue to support effective developer2. working relationships to the mutual Supporting effective engagement is not about being in favour or against a particular 1 benefit of all involved. ” proposed development. It is about trying to make sure that: The opportunity decisions made in the planning system There is increasing recognition of the value are as well-informed, evidence-based and that good community engagement can bring to timely as possible; and developments, helping to make them locally appropriate and providing the foundations of any development that is permitted reflects positive long-term relationships between the an understanding of local interests and host community and those involved in the opportunities for positive local gain3. development. Standards of engagement are continually evolving and this guidance aims to The reason recognise, encourage and share this. The aim of this guidance is to set out best Effective engagement between a developer, practice on engagement, help people local community, local authority
Recommended publications
  • Cameron Tait P Post

    Cameron Tait P Post

    TRANSITION Meeting Britain’s energy BY needs together CONSENT Cameron Tait p post ABOUT THE FABIAN SOCIETY The Fabian Society is Britain’s oldest political think tank. Since 1884 the society has played a central role in developing political ideas and public policy on the left. It aims to promote greater equality of power and opportunity; the value of collective public action; a vibrant, tolerant and accountable democracy; citizenship, liberty and human rights; sustainable development; and multilateral international co-operation. Through a wide range of publications and events the society influences political and public thinking, but also provides a space for broad and open-minded debate, drawing on an unrivalled external network and its own expert research and analysis. Its programme offers a unique breadth, encompassing national conferences and expert seminars; periodicals, books, reports and digital communications; and commissioned and in-house research and comment. The Society is alone among think tanks in being a democratically-constituted membership organisation, with almost 7,000 members. Over time our membership has included many of the key thinkers on the British left and every Labour prime minister. Today we count over 200 parliamentarians in our number. The voluntary society includes 70 local societies, the Fabian Women’s Network and the Young Fabians, which is itself the leading organisation on the left for young people to debate and influence political ideas. The society was one of the original founders of the Labour party and is constitutionally affiliated to the party. We are however editorially, organisationally and financially independent and work with a wide range of partners from all political persuasions and none.
  • Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2017

    Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2017

    DIGEST OF UNITED KINGDOM ENERGY STATISTICS 2017 July 2017 This document is available in large print, audio and braille on request. Please email [email protected] with the version you require. Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics Enquiries about statistics in this publication should be made to the contact named at the end of the relevant chapter. Brief extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided that the source is fully acknowledged. General enquiries about the publication, and proposals for reproduction of larger extracts, should be addressed to BEIS, at the address given in paragraph XXVIII of the Introduction. The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) reserves the right to revise or discontinue the text or any table contained in this Digest without prior notice This is a National Statistics publication The United Kingdom Statistics Authority has designated these statistics as National Statistics, in accordance with the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 and signifying compliance with the UK Statistics Authority: Code of Practice for Official Statistics. Designation can be broadly interpreted to mean that the statistics: ñ meet identified user needs ONCEñ are well explained and STATISTICSreadily accessible HAVE ñ are produced according to sound methods, and BEENñ are managed impartially DESIGNATEDand objectively in the public interest AS Once statistics have been designated as National Statistics it is a statutory NATIONALrequirement that the Code of Practice S TATISTICSshall continue to be observed IT IS © A Crown copyright 2017 STATUTORY You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence.
  • Wind Powered Electricity in the UK Wind Powered Electricity in the UK

    Wind Powered Electricity in the UK Wind Powered Electricity in the UK

    Special feature – Wind powered electricity in the UK Wind powered electricity in the UK This article looks at wind powered electricity in the UK, examining how its position in the UK energy mix has shifted from 2010 to 20191, and how wind capacity may change in the future. Key points • Total wind generating capacity increased by 19 GW from 5.4 GW in 2010 to 24 GW in 2019. This is the result of sizeable increases in capacity both onshore and offshore, which are up 10 GW and 8.5 GW respectively. • In the last year, UK offshore wind capacity rose 1.6 GW following the opening of Hornsea One, Beatrice extension (partially operational in 2018) and East Anglia One (partially operational). Hornsea One is now the largest offshore wind farm in the world with an operational capacity of over 1.2 GW. • In 2019, wind generators became the UK’s second largest source of electricity, providing 64 TWh; almost one fifth of the UK’s total generation. This was achieved by record onshore and offshore generation despite suboptimal conditions for wind, with 2019 reporting the lowest average wind speeds since 2012. • Onshore generation exceeded offshore for every year 2010 to 2019, however the gap narrowed each year. In 2019 the difference was marginal with each providing 32 TWh of electricity and 9.9 per cent of the UK’s total generation. • Offshore sites are typically able to use more of their available capacity for generation, as wind speed and direction are more consistent offshore. This is measured by the load factor, the proportion of maximum generation achieved.
  • UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies

    UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies

    The UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies Final Report A report to the DTI Renewable Energy Development & Deployment Team June 2003 Imperial College London Centre for Energy Policy and Technology & E4tech Consulting ii Executive summary Background and approach This report considers how innovation systems in the UK work for a range of new and renewable energy technologies. It uses a broad definition of 'innovation' - to include all the stages and activities required to exploit new ideas, develop new and improved products, and deliver them to end users. The study assesses the diversity of influences that affect innovation, and the extent to which they support or inhibit the development and commercialisation of innovative new technologies in the UK. The innovation process for six new and renewable energy sectors is analysed: • Wind (onshore and offshore) • Marine (wave and tidal stream) • Solar PV • Biomass • Hydrogen from renewables • District and micro-CHP In order to understand innovation better, the report takes a systems approach, and a generic model of the innovation system is developed and used to explore each case. The systems approach has its origins in the international literature on innovation. The organising principles are twofold: • The stages of innovation. Innovation proceeds through a series of stages, from basic R&D to commercialisation – but these are interlinked, and there is no necessity for all innovations to go through each and every stage. The stages are defined as follows: Basic and applied R&D includes both ‘blue skies’ science and engineering/application focused research respectively; Demonstration from prototypes to the point where full scale working devices are installed in small numbers; Pre-commercial captures the move from the first few multiples of units to much larger scale installation for the first time; Supported commercial is the stage where technologies are rolled out in large numbers, given generic support measures; Commercial technologies can compete unsupported within the broad regulatory framework.
  • Reunification in South Wales

    Reunification in South Wales

    Power Wind Marine Delivering marine expertise worldwide www.metoc.co.uk re News Part of the Petrofac group www.tnei.co.uk RENEWABLE ENERGY NEWS • ISSUE 226 27 OCTOBER 2011 TAG on for Teesside spoils TAG Energy Solutions is in negotiations for a contract to fabricate and deliver a “significant” proportion of Reunification monopiles for the Teesside offshore wind farm. PAGE 2 Middlemoor winning hand in south Wales Vestas is in pole position to land a plum supply RWE npower renewables with Nordex for 14 N90 middle when two contract at one of the largest remaining onshore has thrown in the towel 2.5MW units and has landowners decided in wind farms in England, RWE npower renewables’ at an 11-turbine wind roped Powersystems UK 2005 to proceed instead 18-turbine Middlemoor project in Northumberland. farm in south Wales and to oversee electrical with Pennant. offloaded the asset to works. Parent company Years of wrangling PAGE 3 local developer Pennant Walters Group will take ensued between Walters. care of civil engineering. environmental regulators Huhne hits the high notes The utility sold the The 35MW project is due and planners in Bridgend Energy secretary Chris Huhne took aim at “faultfinders consented four-turbine online by early 2013. and Rhondda Cynon Taf and curmudgeons who hold forth on the impossibility portion of its Fforch Nest The reunification of who were keen to see of renewables” in a strongly worded keynote address project in Bridgend and Fforch Nest and Pant-y- the projects rationalised to RenewableUK 2011 in Manchester this week. is in line to divest the Wal brings to an end a using a shared access remaining seven units if decade-long struggle and grid connection.
  • Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management

    Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management

    Appendix A - Responsibilities for Flood Risk Management The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has overall responsibility for flood risk management in England. Their aim is to reduce flood risk by: • discouraging inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding. • encouraging adequate and cost effective flood warning systems. • encouraging adequate technically, environmentally and economically sound and sustainable flood defence measures. The Government’s Foresight Programme has recently produced a report called Future Flooding, which warns that the risk of flooding will increase between 2 and 20 times over the next 75 years. The report produced by the Office of Science and Technology has a long-term vision for the future (2030 – 2100), helping to make sure that effective strategies are developed now. Sir David King, the Chief Scientific Advisor to the Government concluded: “continuing with existing policies is not an option – in virtually every scenario considered (for climate change), the risks grow to unacceptable levels. Secondly, the risk needs to be tackled across a broad front. However, this is unlikely to be sufficient in itself. Hard choices need to be taken – we must either invest in more sustainable approaches to flood and coastal management or learn to live with increasing flooding”. In response to this, Defra is leading the development of a new strategy for flood and coastal erosion for the next 20 years. This programme, called “Making Space for Water” will help define and set the agenda for the Government’s future strategic approach to flood risk. Within this strategy there will be an overall approach to the assessing options through a strong and continuing commitment to CFMPs and SMPs within a broader planning framework which will include River Basin Management Plans prepared under the Water Framework Directive and Integrated Coastal Zone Management.
  • WIND ENERGY PROJECT FINANCING ONSHORE CASE STUDY with Zephir Lidar

    WIND ENERGY PROJECT FINANCING ONSHORE CASE STUDY with Zephir Lidar

    WIND ENERGY PROJECT FINANCING ONSHORE CASE STUDY with ZephIR Lidar “ZephIR delivers bankable, finance-grade wind data to Banks taking sites forward in a timely, cost effective and safe manner - correlations with a short mast are far better than often found when comparing two cup anemometers.” - REG Windpower world-leading lidar innovation finance-grade, ‘bankable’ wind data sets unparalleled data availability at all heights accurate, proven measurements in all terrains 650+ deployments and 3 million hours operation zephirlidar.com REG WINDPOWER LTD. Established in 1989 as Cornwall Light & Power, REG Windpower develops, builds and owns wind farms. The company now operate eleven wind farms (with a further two in construction) in England & Wales with an additional 900MW+ in development across the UK. In 2009, REG performed a strategic review of their approach to wind monitoring and the question was raised how to monitor wind more rapidly and more cost effectively against anemometry with traditional tall met masts. Zephir + short MAST MethodoLOGY REG implemented a strategy for 16 metre short met masts In 2009, REG purchased three ZephIRs to operate across the coupled with 6 month ZephIR lidar deployments for the rapid company’s entire portfolio of projects. The methodology is to and cost effective measurement of wind quality on potential install the short mast as the long term reference, collecting sites, for the following reasons: at least 12 months data covering seasonal variation. The ZephIR is installed for 6 months next to the mast - 6 months 1. Short masts are easier to get planning permission to is an adequate length of time to measure a significant range install on site - taller masts can take much longer.
  • CARBINIDAE of CORNWALL Keith NA Alexander

    CARBINIDAE of CORNWALL Keith NA Alexander

    CARBINIDAE OF CORNWALL Keith NA Alexander PB 1 Family CARABIDAE Ground Beetles The RDB species are: The county list presently stands at 238 species which appear to have been reliably recorded, but this includes • Grasslands on free-draining soils, presumably maintained either by exposure or grazing: 6 which appear to be extinct in the county, at least three casual vagrants/immigrants, two introductions, Harpalus honestus – see extinct species above two synathropic (and presumed long-term introductions) and one recent colonist. That makes 229 resident • Open stony, sparsely-vegetated areas on free-draining soils presumably maintained either by exposure breeding species, of which about 63% (147) are RDB (8), Nationally Scarce (46) or rare in the county (93). or grazing: Ophonus puncticollis – see extinct species above Where a species has been accorded “Nationally Scarce” or “British Red Data Book” status this is shown • On dry sandy soils, usually on coast, presumably maintained by exposure or grazing: immediately following the scientific name. Ophonus sabulicola (Looe, VCH) The various categories are essentially as follows: • Open heath vegetation, generally maintained by grazing: Poecilus kugelanni – see BAP species above RDB - species which are only known in Britain from fewer than 16 of the 10km squares of the National Grid. • Unimproved flushed grass pastures with Devil’s-bit-scabious: • Category 1 Endangered - taxa in danger of extinction Lebia cruxminor (‘Bodmin Moor’, 1972 & Treneglos, 1844) • Category 2 Vulnerable - taxa believed
  • Local Energy

    Local Energy

    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Local Energy Sixth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 9 May and 16 July 2013 Published on 6 August 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Rt Hon Peter Lilley MP (Conservative, Hitchin & Harpenden) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the Parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliament.uk/ecc.
  • Cornwall in the Bronze Age �A��ICIA M� C��IS�IE

    Cornwall in the Bronze Age AICIA M CISIE

    CORNISH ARCHAEOLOGY No. 25 (1986) Cornwall in the Bronze Age AICIA M CISIE The Concept of a Bronze 'Age' Any review of the Bronze Age in Cornwall, or indeed in other areas of the British Isles, must today present the writer with a very different prospect to that which lay before Bernard Wailes 28 years ago, although much of the basic information remains the same. We now know, for example, that metallurgy was introduced into these islands before the middle of the third millennium bc, probably from two continental quarters, the Rhineland and the Atlantic region. Our period has lengthened and the calibration of radiocarbon dates means that it not only overlaps the Late Neolithic but also merges into the Iron Age in the mid-first millennium BC, giving a total of some 2000 years. The accumulation of data and dates, togther with advances in excavation and research techniques and the recognition of regional variation, make the whole concept of a Bronze 'age' far more complex than hitherto. In the 1960s, HawkeV scheme for the divisions of the British Bronze Age provided the framework (Hawkes, 1960) and was widely accepted in principle. As more radiocarbon dates have become available, there have nevertheless been surprises and many refinements have been applied, allowing a broader, more flexible approach into which ceramics and metalwork can be fitted. Today the most widely accepted scheme is that propounded by Burgess (in 5/0 wo OE AGE SIES SS 00 SX - 2,0 Fig 1 Location map showing principal sites mentioned in the text. Settlements or occupation
  • LONDON GAZETTE, 19Rh SEPTEMBER. 1968

    LONDON GAZETTE, 19Rh SEPTEMBER. 1968

    10124 LONDON GAZETTE, 19rH SEPTEMBER. 1968 Provisional Register of Common Land—continued Registered Name of Common Approx. Acreage Parish Remarks Tawna Downs ... 240 Cardinham (a) Treslea Downs 200 Cardinham and Warleggan (a) Davidstow Moor 1100 Davidstow . (a) Shallow Water Common 440 Blisland (a) The Green 17 Gwinear-Gwithian (a) Kenneggy Downs or Greenbury Downs 18 Germoe Germoe Green 0-11 Germoe Treguth Common 21 Cubert . Rosenannon Downs ... 465 Saint Wenn (a) Wesifl Moor 8 Altarnun (a) High Moor 1480 Altarnun (a) Goonhilly Downs 330 Mawgan-in-Meneage Clodgy Moor 15 Paul (a) The whole of the Foreshore Tintagel The Prince of Wales Quarry —20 Tintagel Eastern Green ... 3-4 Breage (a) Rinsey Green 0-42 Breage Trew Well 0-495 Breage Caradon Hill and Fore Downs — also Five Parcels known as Caradon Common of Land Saint Cleer and Linkinhome (a) Chun Downs 40 Sancreed (a) Boswens Moor ... 16 Sancreed fa) Boswens Common 22 Sancreed (a) The Jacka, Portloe Veryan Un-named piece of land — Portloe ... — Veryan St. Breward Common and Rough — Tor Downs 2500 Saint Breward and Blisland (a) St. Breward Common and Rough Tor Downs — also part of an area Small Parcels known as Hamatethy Commons ... of Land Sairnt Breward (a) St. Breward Common and Rough Tor Downs — also known as Hamatethy Commons 73 Advent (a) St. Breward Common and Rough Tor Downs — also part of an area known as Hamatethy Commons ... 86 Saint Breward (a) "No Mans Land" Veryan Veryan The Wastrels, Constantine Bay ... — Saint Merryn (a) Rosuic Croft and Higher Green ... — Saint Keverne (a) The Lizard Green — Landewednack Cummings Memorial Recreation __ Ground Landewednack Boswednack Common v — Zennor (a) Tregeseall and Bosvargar Common two parcels St.
  • Spotlight on Northern Ireland Regional Focus

    Spotlight on Northern Ireland Regional Focus

    COMMUNICATION HUB FOR THE WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY ‘TITANIC’ SPOTLIGHT ON NORTHERN IRELAND REGIONAL FOCUS GLOBAL WIND ALLIANCE COMPETEncY BasED TRaininG FEBRUARY/MARCH 2012 | £5.25 www.windenergynetwork.co.uk INTRODUCTION COMMUNICATING YOUR THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS WIND ENERGY NETWORK TV CHANNEL AND ONLINE LIBRARY These invaluable industry resources continue to build and we are very YOU WILL FIND WITHIN THIS We hope you enjoy the content and pleased with the interest and support EDITION CONTRIBUTIONS WHICH please feel free to contact us to make of our proposed sponsors. Please give COULD BE DESCRIBED AS OPINION your feelings known – it’s good to talk. the team a call and find out how to get PIECES. THEY ARE THERE TO FOCUS involved in both. ATTENTION ON VERY IMPORTANT ‘SpoTLIGHT ON’ regIONAL FOCUS SUBJECT AREAS WITH A VIEW Our regional focus in this edition features Remember they are free to TO GALVANISING OPINION AND Northern Ireland. Your editor visited contribute and free to access. BRINGING THE INDUSTRY TOGETHER the area in late November 2011 when TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE PROGRESS reporting on the Quo Vadis conference Please also feel free to contact us AND THEREFORE SUCCESS. and spent a very enjoyable week soaking if you wish to highlight any specific up the atmosphere, local beverages as area within the industry and we will Ray Sams from Spencer Coatings well the Irish hospitality (the craic). endeavour to encourage debate and features corrosion in marine steel feature the issue within our publication. structures, Warren Fothergill from As you will see it is a very substantial Group Safety Services on safety feature and the overall theme is one of passports and Michael Wilder from excitement and forward thinking which Petans on competency based training will ensure Northern Ireland is at the standardisation.