DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Reference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report Reference Report International experience in transboundary mountain governance: insights for Andean cooperation BALSIGER, Jörg, DUPUITS, Emilie Françoise, SCOLOBIG, Anna & United Nations Environment Programme Reference BALSIGER, Jörg, DUPUITS, Emilie Françoise, SCOLOBIG, Anna & United Nations Environment Programme. International experience in transboundary mountain governance: insights for Andean cooperation. Geneva : United Nations Environment Programme, 2020, 126 p. Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:145756 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 International Experience in Transboundary Mountain Governance: Insights for Andean Cooperation Jörg Balsiger, Emilie Dupuits, Anna Scolobig October 2020 Institute for Environmental Governance and Territorial Development, University of Geneva, Switzerland Proposed citation Balsiger, J., Dupuits, E., Scolobig, A. 2020. International Experience in Transboundary Mountain Go!ernance" Insights $or Andean %ooperation. Geneva" Institute $or Environ&ental Go!ernance and Territorial Develop&ent, University of Geneva. Corresponding author J(rg Balsiger, Institute o$ Environ&ental overnance and Territorial Develop&ent, 'niversity o$ Geneva, Boulevard Carl)*ogt 6+, 120- Geneva, S.it/erland. Contact" [email protected]# Acknowledgments T#is report .as produced t#rough an agree&ent .it# '1 Environ&ent 2rogra&&e, 34ce for 5atin A&erica and t#e %aribbean 6SS7A85atin A&erica %aribbean8%%89++820,:;, .it# <nancial support by t#e pro=ect “Accelerating Cli&ate Action under Eurocli&a?@. T#e report .as elaborated at t#e 'niversity o$ enevaAs Institute o$ Environ&ental Go!ernance and Territorial Develop&ent, wit# inputs fro& %arolina Adler, Executive Director of t#e Mountain Researc# Initiative. T#e reportAs contents are t#e sole responsibility o$ its aut#ors and do not necessarily reCect t#e vie.s of U1 Environ&ent Progra&&e. T#e aut#ors .is# to t#anD t#e staE o$ t#e '1 Environ&ent 2rogra&&e o4ce in 2ana&a and o$ %ondesan for t#eir support and co&&ents on t#e .orD as .ell as $or t#e organi/ation o$ a dedicated session at t#e Ministerial %onsultation o$ t#e Andean Mountain Initiative #eld in Fuito on ,G)20 1ove&ber 20,:. Table of Contents Executive Su&&ary.....................................................................................................................- Abbreviations............................................................................................................................,H ,. %ontext and objectives...........................................................................................................,- 2. I#at &aDes &ountain go!ernance .orDJ............................................................................,+ 2., Assess&ent fra&e.orD..................................................................................................................,+ 2.,., Analytical concepts.................................................................................................................,+ 2.2 E&pirical scope of t#e assess&ent................................................................................................,9 2.H Assess&ent approac#....................................................................................................................,: 2.H., Sources and met#ods.............................................................................................................,: 2.H.2 Analysis...................................................................................................................................,G H. Insig#ts $ro& &ountain go!ernance around t#e .orld........................................................,G H., Overvie. of mountain range go!ernance pro<les.........................................................................,G H.,., Europe.....................................................................................................................................,G H.,.2 Asia..........................................................................................................................................21 H.,.H A$rica.......................................................................................................................................22 H.,.K Nort# A&erica........................................................................................................................22 H.2 Institutional features of t#e regional go!ernance opportunity structure.....................................22 H.2., Territoriality............................................................................................................................23 H.2.2 Institutional for&ality............................................................................................................24 H.2.H Sectoral integration...............................................................................................................2- H.2.4 Civil society participation.......................................................................................................29 H.2.- Science)policy interface........................................................................................................2: H.2.+ Cli&ate c#ange......................................................................................................................29 K. Mainstrea&ing ecosyste&)based adaptation......................................................................H0 4., EbA and Eco)DBB8%%A in post)20,- global policy agree&ents..................................................H2 4.2 EbA and C%A in Mountain Range Go!ernance..............................................................................HH 4.2., Carpat#ian Convention..........................................................................................................HK 4.2.2 Alpine Convention.................................................................................................................HK 4.H EbA in Sout# A&erica....................................................................................................................H- 4.H., Regional and subregional policy instru&ents.......................................................................H: 4.4 In)dept# case analysis...................................................................................................................HG 4.4., T#e TacanL Iaters#eds transboundary .ater go!ernance t#rough local co&&unity ecosyste&)based action (Mexico)Guate&ala;, Central A&erica..................................................HG 4.4.2 Sustainable &ountain ecosyste&s &anage&ent in t#e Mig# 2a&ir and 2a&ir)Alai Mountains (Ta=iDistan)Nyrgy/stan;, Central Asia..........................................................................KK 4.4.H Upscaling EbA in Peru...........................................................................................................K+ 4.4.4 Isar river ecosyste&)based restoration (Austria)Ger&any;, Europe..................................K: 4.- Regional governance opportunity structure..................................................................................-, Balsiger et al. 62020;" International Experience in Transboundary Mountain o!ernance , 4.-., Territoriality............................................................................................................................-, 4.-.2 Institutional for&ality............................................................................................................-2 4.-.H Sectoral integration...............................................................................................................-H 4.-.4 Vertical integration...............................................................................................................-K 4.-.- CS3 participation..................................................................................................................-- 4.-.+ Science)policy interface........................................................................................................-+ 4.-.9 Funding arrange&ents..........................................................................................................-9 4.+ Conclusions for EbA Mainstrea&ing.............................................................................................-G -. Begionalization efforts in 5atin A&erica...............................................................................+, -., Cata&ayo)%#ira transboundary river basin, Ecuador)2eru..........................................................+, Territoriality.....................................................................................................................................+, 7or&ality and funding.....................................................................................................................+2 %ross)sectoral and vertical integration..........................................................................................+2 %S3 Participation...........................................................................................................................+K Science)policy interaction..............................................................................................................+K %li&ate c#ange adaptation............................................................................................................+K Institutional fit and Transition pat#s..............................................................................................+-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flash Update Inter-Agency Response Mixed Movements from the North of Central America (Nca)
    FLASH UPDATE INTER-AGENCY RESPONSE MIXED MOVEMENTS FROM THE NORTH OF CENTRAL AMERICA (NCA) 14 - 17 January 2019 IOM, the International Organization for Migration, is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As the leading international organization for migration, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to assist in meeting the growing operational challenges of migration management, advance understanding of migration issues, encourage social and economic development through migration and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, supports States in providing international protection to asylum-seekers and refugees, those who have fled their countries of origin because their lives are at risk. UNHCR holds periodic discussions with governments, other UN agencies and NGOs at the field level with the aim of facilitating a coordinated response in terms of shelter, humanitarian assistance, basic services, and access to asylum procedures, as well as on finding durable solutions to the plight of asylum-seekers and refugees. UNICEF works with local and national governments and civil society to protect the rights of refugee and migrant children, through addressing the root causes of forced and irregular migration and ensuring the integral protection of the rights of children in countries of origin, transit and destination. UNICEF works in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador where it provides immediate support to children and families
    [Show full text]
  • Unrestricted Version
    Unrestricted Version Regional Program Plan In Support of the Regional Strategy for Central America and Mexico FY 2003-2008 The Regional Program Plan was approved by the Agency on July 19, 2004. It sets forth the Agency’s policy and strategic direction for regional programs and assistance in Central America and Mexico. Budget data contained in this document are estimates and do not represent a U.S. government commitment to provide a specific level of funding. Release Date: July 31, 2004 C O N T E N T S Page I. Rationale for Assistance and Summary Analysis of the Assistance Environment......................1 A. Summary of Regional Program Plan and Relationship to CAM Regional Strategy ...........1 B. Foreign Policy Interests and Goals in the Region...............................................................2 C. Overview of Regional Needs and Development Challenges ..............................................2 D. Regional Role of Other Donors ...........................................................................................3 E. Proposed Regional Program Plan ......................................................................................4 F. Cross-Cutting Issues...........................................................................................................5 II. Strategic Objectives ....................................................................................................................5 A. SO 2 Economic Freedom: Open, Diversified, Expanding Economies ...............................5 B. SO 3 Investing
    [Show full text]
  • Defence of Territory and Human Rights in Petén: Resisting Mega Projects, a High Risk Activity
    Defence of territory and human rights in Petén: Resisting mega projects, a high risk activity Author: Eva Virgilli Recasens Coordination: Amaya de Miguel Vallés Support to the production of the report: Silvia Weber Translation: Adam Paul Lunn Published and distributed: PBI Guatemala Photos: PBI 2014-2015 Design: Rubén Carricondo June 2016 Creative Common: This work has been published under Creative Commons’s licence. It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of this publication provided it is without means of profit, the source is mentioned and PBI Guatemala is notified about the use (mail to [email protected]). PEACE BRIGADES INTERNATIONAL BRIGADAS INTERNACIONALES DE PAZ INDEX 1. Brief history: Petén, no man’s land? .................................................................................................. 4 1.1. The XX century: from state colonization to conservation ......................................... 4 1.2. The XXI century and the expansion of mega projects in the region ...................................6 2. Communities in Resistance: Laguna del Tigre and Sierra del Lacandon .......................................7 2.1. Between Forced evictions and cooperation agreements ...................................................... 7 2.2. Obstacles to defending human rights ......................................................................................11 3. Living among palm trees ....................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Final Evaluation
    Summary of Final Evaluation ዘ ዚ I. Outline of the Project Countryዖ Honduras Project titleዖ Chagas disease control project Issue/Sectorዖ Cooperation schemeዖ Technical Cooperation Project Health- Infectious Disease Control Division in chargeዖ Total cost (estimated at completion of the Project)ዖ Infectious Disease Control Team, Approximately 247 million Japanese Yen Group IV (Health II), Human Development Department (R/D): Partner Country’s Implementing Organizationዖ Period of From September 2, Secretariat of Health headquarters and its departmental offices in Cooperation 2003 to September 1, Copan, Lempira, Ocotepeque and Intibuca departments 2007 Supporting Organization in Japanዖ Tecnical Committee for Chagas Disease Control in Central America Other organization related: Pan American Health Organization of World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) 1 Background of the Project Chagas disease is called a “neglected disease” or an “illness of the poor stratum”. The insect vectors (Triatominae) thrive in houses with mud walls and thatch roofs feeding on humans and transmit Trypanosoma cruzi – causative agent of Chagas disease. There are treatment medicines for acute cases, but not for chronic cases leading death by heart problem a decade to two decades after infection. Chagas disease is considered to be one of the serious tropical diseases with malaria and dengue fever in Central and South America. The number of patients in the region is estimated more than 20 million. In Central America, it is supposed that about 2.44 million people are infected, which is about 9% of the total population. In case of Honduras, it is assumed that about 0.3 million people (7% of population) are infected.
    [Show full text]
  • "Lived Religion, Identity, and Collective Action Among the Maya of Jupiter
    - “Transnationalism and Collective Mobilization among the Maya of Jupiter: Ambiguities of Transnational Identity and Lived Religion” Prepared for the: Transnational Religion in Contemporary Latin America and the United States Conference Sponsored by the Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin American Studies January 26-27th, 2006 The University of Texas at Austin Latin American Studies & Library (LLILAS) 1 University Station D 0800 Austin, TX 78712-0331 Dr. Timothy J. Steigenga ([email protected]) Wilkes Honors College Florida Atlantic University 561-799-8610 [email protected] 1 - Politics and Religion As a social scientist who studies religion, I find myself frequently caught between the elusiveness and the explanatory power of my research subject. As a political scientist I have been conditioned to abridge, quantify, and correlate variables in the most parsimonious fashion possible. At the same time, everything I have learned from the field of religious studies pulls me back toward qualifiers, layers of analysis, and the shifting meanings and interpretations of religious variables across contexts and time. The most consistent finding I have discovered in the study of religion and politics is the fact that religious beliefs, identities, practices, and institutions always have complex and even contradictory effects. Religion imposes hierarchy while granting freedom, empowers agency while placing powerful restraints, and builds community while fostering conflict. This complexity is what continues to draw me to the subject of religion and politics in general, and to the subject of this paper in particular. Transnational Identity, Reactive Ethnicity, and the Ambiguity of “Home” One of the primary goals of our initial grant proposal to the Ford Foundation was to understand the impact that various forms of religious transnationalism have on the formation or continuation of collective identities among immigrants in South Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Evaluation Report of the Republic of Guatemala
    Mutual Evaluation Report of the Republic of Guatemala NOVEMBER 2016 Mutual Evaluation Report of Guatemala CONTENTS TABLE OF ACRONYMS.................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 4 MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT ..................................................................................................11 Preface............................................................................................................................................11 CHAPTER 1. ML/TF RISKS AND CONTEXT ...............................................................................12 CHAPTER 2. NATIONAL AML/CFT POLICIES AND COORDINATION .....................................25 Immediate Outcome 1 (Risk, Policy and Coordination) ......................................................................26 CHAPTER 3. LEGAL SYSTEM AND OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS .............................................33 Immediate Outcome 6 (financial intelligence ML/TF) ........................................................................34 Immediate Outcome 7 (investigation and prosecution of ML) .............................................................43 Immediate Outcome 8 (confiscation).................................................................................................57 CHAPTER 4. TERRORIST FINANCING AND FINANCING OF PROLIFERATION ..........................64
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Mesoamerica Ecosystem Profile
    Ecosystem Profile THE SOUTHERN REGION of the MESOAMERICA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT NICARAGUA, COSTA RICA, PANAMA Final version December 11, 2001 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 THE ECOSYSTEM PROFILE 4 THE CORRIDOR APPROACH TO CONSERVATION 4 BACKGROUND 5 BIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF THE MESOAMERICA HOTSPOT 6 LEVELS OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND ENDEMISM 7 PRIORITIZATION OF CORRIDORS WITHIN THE HOTSPOT 7 STATUS OF PROTECTED AREAS IN MESOAMERICA 10 SYNOPSIS OF THREATS 13 DEFORESTATION 13 CONFLICTS IN LEGAL FRAMEWORK 13 ILLEGAL LOGGING AND SQUATTING 14 TOURISM 14 AGRIBUSINESS 14 ADMINISTRATIVE CORRUPTION AND INEFFICIENCY 14 HYDROELECTRIC DAMS 15 OIL DRILLING AND PIPELINES 15 ROADS 15 MINING 15 CATTLE GRAZING 15 POACHING, OVERFISHING AND ILLEGAL HUNTING 16 WEAK NGO PRESENCE 16 LAND TENURE ISSUES 16 POPULATION GROWTH 16 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 16 SPECIFIC THREATS IN THE CERRO SILVA-INDIO MAIZ-LA SELVA CORRIDOR 17 SPECIFIC THREATS IN THE TALAMANCAS-PIEDRAS BLANCAS-OSA CORRIDOR 17 SPECIFIC THREATS IN THE TALAMANCAS-BOCAS DEL TORO CORRIDOR 18 SYNOPSIS OF CURRENT INVESTMENTS 19 MULTILATERAL DONORS 20 PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS 21 NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS 21 NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS 23 CEPF NICHE FOR INVESTMENT IN THE REGION 27 CEPF INVESTMENT STRATEGY AND PROGRAM FOCUS 29 STRENGTHEN KEY CONSERVATION ALLIANCES AND NETWORKS WITHIN CORRIDORS 30 CONNECT CRITICAL AREAS THROUGH ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES 31 PROMOTE AWARENESS AND CONSERVATION OF FLAGSHIP SPECIES 32 SUPPORT IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF KEY PROTECTED AREAS 32 SUSTAINABILITY 33 CONCLUSION 33 LIST OF ACRONYMS 34 2 INTRODUCTION The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is designed to better safeguard the world's threatened biodiversity hotspots in developing countries. It is a joint initiative of Conservation International (CI), the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Beyond Borders: the International Dimensions Of
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, History, Department of Department of History Spring 5-2016 Conflict Beyond Borders: The nI ternational Dimensions of Nicaragua's Violent Twentieth- Century, 1909-1990 Andrew William Wilson University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Latin American History Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Wilson, Andrew William, "Conflict Beyond Borders: The nI ternational Dimensions of Nicaragua's Violent Twentieth-Century, 1909-1990" (2016). Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History. 87. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss/87 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CONFLICT BEYOND BORDERS: THE INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS OF NICARAGUA’S VIOLENT TWENTIETH-CENTURY, 1909-1990 by Andrew W. Wilson A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: History Under the Supervision of Professor Thomas Borstelmann Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2016 CONFLICT BEYOND BORDERS: THE INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS OF NICARAGUA’S VIOLENT TWENTIETH CENTURY, 1909-1990 Andrew William Wilson, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2016 Advisor: Thomas Borstelmann The purpose of this research is to identify the importance of Nicaraguan political contests in the global twentieth century. The goal is to demonstrate that, despite its relatively small size, Nicaragua significantly influenced the course of modern history.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Evaluation for the 5-Year Status Review of the Golden-Cheeked Warbler
    1 2 3 4 SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION FOR THE 5-YEAR STATUS REVIEW OF THE 5 GOLDEN-CHEEKED WARBLER 6 7 November 2010 8 9 10 Prepared for 11 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 12 13 14 Prepared by 15 Julie E. Groce, Heather A. Mathewson, Michael L. Morrison, and Neal Wilkins 16 17 Institute of Renewable Natural Resources 18 and the 19 Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences 20 Texas A&M University, College Station,Texas 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 1 Table of Contents 35 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 9 36 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 12 37 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 12 38 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 12 39 1.3 Authors and Review Panel .................................................................................................. 13 40 1.3.1 Status Review Team .................................................................................................... 13 41 1.3.2 Review Panel ............................................................................................................... 13 42 1.3.3 Peer review..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • No Se Trata Solo De Migrantes Se Trata De La Soberanía Y La Fraternidad Entre Los Pueblos Centroamericanos
    It’s Not Just Migrants, It’s the Sovereignty and Fraternity of the Central American Peoples On this September 29, which the Catholic Church and affiliated organizations celebrate as World Migrants and Refugees Day, the following organizations offer this statement to public opinion and public authorities: Since the month of June, the United States has pressured Mexico to be a “Safe Third Country” in order to impede citizens of Guatemala from reaching the United States, and then pressured Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Panama to change their migration policies. In the last decades we have not seen such a crushing intervention, not only using diplomacy but economic blackmail: threats of tariffs on our products, and taxes on remittances. Nor have we seen a such a servile and humiliating response from our governments who compete to see who can better obey Donald Trump. The president of El Salvador requested from the United States different treatment than Honduras and Guatemala, and on September 12 deployed 1,100 border patrol to stop migration, funded by the United States. In June, the government of Guatemala offered the Trump administration the possibility of allowing North American troops to control the borders of Guatemala. On June 26, the government then signed a dishonorable migration agreement, which in the United States is called “Safe Third Country,” and in Guatemala is called by a different name to disguise its impact. It is an agreement whose content was hidden from Congress, the future president, and the office of the United Nations in charge of these matters, such as UNHCR, in a mockery of our people and our sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Conqueror As a Business Man: a Chapter in the History
    New Mexico Quarterly Volume 28 | Issue 1 Article 2 1958 The pS anish Conqueror as a Business Man: a chapter in the history of Fernando Cortes France V. Scholes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmq Recommended Citation Scholes, France V.. "The pS anish Conqueror as a Business Man: a chapter in the history of Fernando Cortes." New Mexico Quarterly 28, 1 (1958). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmq/vol28/iss1/2 This Contents is brought to you for free and open access by the University of New Mexico Press at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Quarterly by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Scholes: The Spanish Conqueror as a Business Man: a chapter in the history ... Presented here is the University of New Mexico Fourt~ Annual Research Lecture, delivered by Dr. Scholes on May 3,1957. The Serra Award of the Americas, an international citation "in recognition of his contributions to the progress of Spanish American History," was conferred upon Dr. Scholes in 1956 by the Academy of American Franciscan History. Now Research Professor at the University of New Mexico, Dr. Scholes has served this institution as professor, Chairman of the Department of I Iistory, Dean of the Graduate School, and Academic Vice-President. He is author of more than forty published titles, primarily in fields of the colonial history of Spain in the New W orId. Published by UNM Digital Repository, 1958 1 New Mexico Quarterly, Vol. 28 [1958], Iss.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in the Past Is in the Past?
    What’s in the past is in the past? Communication about Guatemala’s civil war with the next generation Romy Nieuwenhuizen What’s in the past is in the past? Communication about Guatemala’s civil war with the next generation Romy Nieuwenhuizen [email protected] 3360334 2010/2011 ‐ 1 ‐ Contents A word of gratitude 4 Introduction 5 1. Conflict and education in Guatemala 8 1.1 Guatemala 8 1.2 Post conflict 9 1.3 Education in Guatemala 10 1.4 Learning about the war 11 2. A useful lesson? Education about the war 13 2.1 The CEH and a culture of peace 14 2.2 La Escuelita 15 2.3 Higher education 17 2.4 Peace education 20 3. Between closed doors: Communication about the war with parents 23 3.1 Transmission 23 3.2 The parents 25 3.3 The unaffected 26 3.4 The passionate 27 3.5 The traumatized 29 4. The children speak: How do they feel? 31 4.1 Hatred or reconciliation? 31 4.2 Fear and anger 32 4.3 Biases 33 4.4 Peace 34 5. Conclusion 36 ‐ 2 ‐ 6. Bibliography 38 6.1 Websites 40 7. Appendix 41 7.1 Reflection 41 7.2 Summary in Spanish 44 7.3 Agreement by the Guatemalan ministry of education on the promotion of peace 46 7.4 Photographs 48 ‐ 3 ‐ A word of gratitude On Thursday morning of my first week in Uspantán I walked for fifteen minutes up a hill towards a small school. I could hear children’s voices from far which was a good sign; the school was closed the day before, according to the distant noises, it was open today! I noticed that I started walking slower and slower as I approached the school.
    [Show full text]