The Experience of Guatemalan Women Who Seek Asylum in United States Courts: a Legacy of Paternalism and Gendered Violence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Experience of Guatemalan Women Who Seek Asylum in United States Courts: a Legacy of Paternalism and Gendered Violence 1 The Experience of Guatemalan Women who Seek Asylum in United States Courts: A Legacy of Paternalism and Gendered Violence LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES HONORS THESIS Nina Harris Submitted: April 22, 2020 Defended: April 30, 2020 Advisor, First Reader: Professor Kristina Mani Other Readers: Professor Jan Cooper and Professor Patrick O’Connor 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support, guidance, and academic instruction of faculty across disciplines. First, I would like to thank Professor Kristina Mani for supporting this project from inception to conclusion. Her thoughtful critiques challenged me to take my investigation further and to think analytically about all aspects of this research. Despite the unforeseen challenges of this irregular Spring Semester, Professor Mani sustained her commitment to thoughtful examination of the research material—and to the development of my own authorial voice as a researcher. I would like to thank Professor Patrick O’Connor for his engagement with me since my freshman year. Professor O’Connor encouraged me to explore the academic curriculum at Oberlin and advised three Winter Term projects, in addition to his attention to this thesis. I am grateful to Professor Jan Cooper, who helped me think more broadly about the power and use of language in all forms. Professor Cooper has graciously provided academic and personal support throughout my time at Oberlin. I would also like to thank Professor KJ Cerankowski for their support in developing a set of resources for the feminist theory that grounded this research. Last, I would like to thank Professor Kathryn Miller, who taught the course that inspired my interest in this field over two years ago. I would also like to express my extraordinary gratitude to the staff at the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, in San Francisco. My time at CGRS last summer allowed me to expand my understanding of the asylum system, and to comprehend authentic justice for refugees and immigrants. I am grateful to Felipe Navarro and Isaac Bloch, who provided me with permission and instruction to utilize the CGRS database, shared extensive resources, and continued to answer questions and provide support throughout this academic year. Last, I would like to thank CGRS Executive Director and University of California Hastings College of Law Professor Karen Musalo for her generous mentorship. Professor Musalo guided me as I began to develop my position and arguments for this project. Her commitment to ensuring that the right to asylum remains a liberty in the United States is unmatched. Finally, I would like to express my appreciation to the Latin American Studies and Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies Departments and Faculty for your belief in the value of this research. Both departments’ multidisciplinary approach has shaped the way I engaged with this project and has had a lasting impact on my experience at Oberlin College. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Abstract _____________________________________________________________________5 II. Introduction _________________________________________________________________6 III. Chapter I—Epistemology and Methods: An Anti-colonial Feminist Understanding of Asylum _______________________________14 Feminist International Relations ___________________________________________15 From Colonialism and Coloniality to a Feminist Anti-Colonial Approach __________ 19 Methodology and Sources_________________________________________________24 IV. Chapter II—The United States and Guatemala: A History of Intervention, Instability, and Paternalism _____________________________30 The History of the U.S. Coup d’état_________________________________________34 Developing Economic Concerns and The United Fruit Company ___________34 The October Revolution and the “Ten Years of Springtime”_______________35 The 1954 Coup d’état _____________________________________________38 The Aftermath of the Coup d’état ____________________________________44 Developing Counterinsurgency and the Guatemalan Civil War ___________________46 Not a Showcase for Democracy, but a Laboratory for Repression: 1954-1963 ___ 46 The Counterinsurgency and Civil War Heighten ________________________47 The War’s Effect on Guatemalan Women ______________________________57 Moving into the 21st Century: Organized Crime and U.S. Involvement _______63 Conclusion ____________________________________________________________64 V. Chapter III—The System of Gender-Based Violence in Guatemala: Colonial Roots, Civil War Exacerbation, and an Inadequate Legal System ___________68 Types of Violence Against Women__________________________________________ 72 The Roots of Violence and The Legal Framework______________________________75 The Civil Code __________________________________________________ 75 Domestic Legal Framework ________________________________________78 Machismo_______________________________________________________82 Impunity for Crimes of Gender-Based Violence _______________________________ 85 Conclusion ____________________________________________________________89 VI. Chapter IV—The U.S. Asylum System___________________________________________ 91 Asylum Law in the United States ___________________________________________92 4 The Origins and Classification of International Asylum Policy _____________92 United States Domestic Policy ______________________________________ 93 The Adjudicatory Levels of the Asylum Process _________________________94 A Few Problems of Refugee and Asylum Law __________________________ 96 Gender-Based Asylum ___________________________________________________ 98 Conclusion __________________________________________________________ 101 VII. Chapter V—An Analysis of Asylum Decisions ___________________________________ 102 Introduction __________________________________________________________ 102 Rody Alvarado _________________________________________________ 105 Reina Izabel Garcia Martinez _____________________________________ 106 Aminita Cifuentes _______________________________________________ 107 Asylum Law Constructs and Challenges _____________________________ 108 How General Structural Problems Impact Gender-Based Asylum ________________109 The Enumerated Ground: The Use of the Term “Unable” _______________ 109 Proving Persecution_____________________________________________ 111 Nexus and Credibility: The Problems of Bias _________________________ 114 The Exaggeration of Paternalism in Guatemalan Women’s Asylum Cases _________ 117 Creating a PSG: Guatemalan Women Reposition their Claims ____________117 Proving Sufficient Inability________________________________________ 122 Defining Persecution_____________________________________________124 The Private vs. Public Sphere______________________________________ 126 Establishing Nexus_______________________________________________128 Credibility _____________________________________________________131 Framing Gender-Based Violence as Pervasive_________________________136 Rebutting Persecution, Deemphasizing Individual Harm_________________137 Conclusion: The Legacies of Colonialism___________________________________ 139 VIII. Conclusions_________________________________________________________________146 IX. Bibliography________________________________________________________________159 5 ABSTRACT Karen Musalo, a leading asylum attorney, explains, “In the United States, few refugee issues have been as controversial as that of gender asylum.” Despite perceived progress, inconsistent judicial decisions engender doubts about the viability of gender-based asylum cases. The U.S. courts continue to see violence against women as a personal or family matter rather than a pattern of accepted social behavior supported by the political and legal authorities. Using cases from Guatemalan women seeking asylum, my research scrutinizes the asylum system, and shows how the U.S. furthers a colonial, paternalistic narrative—allowing U.S. judges, adjudicators, and policymakers to decide who is worthy—or not worthy—of U.S. protection. The asylum system interacts with an embedded structure of power that disregards the impact of the historical relationship between the U.S. and Guatemala. Using a textual study of specific case documents, this paper analyzes the experience, ability, and process of seeking asylum as a method for examining the legacies of paternalism. In asylum cases, adjudicators can make decisions based on their own bias against a woman’s testimony. Judges can require women to reshape their experience to meet the provisions of the law and make rulings that deemphasize the experience of violence. My specific study of Guatemalan women seeking asylum shows how factual distortions, institutionalized prejudice, and misogyny impact the asylum process. 6 INTRODUCTION Inconsistencies in United States asylum decisions are not new, but the recent hyper- politicization of immigration policy has elevated the stakes. President Donald Trump is unabashedly anti-immigrant and has referred to immigrants as “criminals” and even “animals.”1 President Trump has insisted to the American public and to the international community that the asylum system is a “loophole.”2 To defend his perspective, he cites policies which allow unauthorized immigrants to be “caught and released” into the United States. In his election campaign, President Trump articulated plans to reduce immigration. The rallying cry of “Build the Wall!” saturated national and international media. Though the Trumpian shibboleth
Recommended publications
  • Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy, Piperlime, Athleta, Intermix
    GAP INC Brands: Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy, Piperlime, Athleta, Intermix WORKER EMPOWERMENT: COMMITMENT & PRACTICE: COLLABORATIVE APPROACH: STRATEGY: 12345768910 12345768910 12345768910 12345768910 TOTAL SCORE: 123457689101112131415116 7 18 19 20 21 22 2324252627 28 29 30 31 32 3334353637 38 39 40 COMPANY POSITION ON THE LIVING WAGE: IN MORE DETAIL: “We remain committed to the principle that wages for Has living-wage benchmarks? a standard working week should meet the basic needs No. of factory workers and provide them with discretionary income. We want to do our part to help ensure workers are being treated fairly and that their compensation Worker empowerment: reflects that ... While there is no universally agreed-upon Gap says: “We use a wide range of approaches to ensure calculation for a living wage, we have made it a priority that FOA [freedom of association] rights are respected to ensure that our suppliers comply with legal wage and communicated clearly with both management and and benefits laws, the violation of which is an ongoing workers. These range from supporting open dialogue problem in the apparel industry.” between factory workers and managers to partnering with workers’ rights groups and trade unions when appropriate. We believe that helping ensure FOA in both WHAT WE SAY: principle and practice is important to laying a foundation for increased wages.” Gap’s submission, although containing many fine words and sentiments, shows little proof of real work that will Gap says factory managers are obliged to inform workers improve wages for workers making its clothes. This is of unions operating in the factory, provide their contact disappointing.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Update Inter-Agency Response Mixed Movements from the North of Central America (Nca)
    FLASH UPDATE INTER-AGENCY RESPONSE MIXED MOVEMENTS FROM THE NORTH OF CENTRAL AMERICA (NCA) 14 - 17 January 2019 IOM, the International Organization for Migration, is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As the leading international organization for migration, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to assist in meeting the growing operational challenges of migration management, advance understanding of migration issues, encourage social and economic development through migration and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, supports States in providing international protection to asylum-seekers and refugees, those who have fled their countries of origin because their lives are at risk. UNHCR holds periodic discussions with governments, other UN agencies and NGOs at the field level with the aim of facilitating a coordinated response in terms of shelter, humanitarian assistance, basic services, and access to asylum procedures, as well as on finding durable solutions to the plight of asylum-seekers and refugees. UNICEF works with local and national governments and civil society to protect the rights of refugee and migrant children, through addressing the root causes of forced and irregular migration and ensuring the integral protection of the rights of children in countries of origin, transit and destination. UNICEF works in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador where it provides immediate support to children and families
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Hope U.S
    Killing Hope U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II – Part I William Blum Zed Books London Killing Hope was first published outside of North America by Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London NI 9JF, UK in 2003. Second impression, 2004 Printed by Gopsons Papers Limited, Noida, India w w w.zedbooks .demon .co .uk Published in South Africa by Spearhead, a division of New Africa Books, PO Box 23408, Claremont 7735 This is a wholly revised, extended and updated edition of a book originally published under the title The CIA: A Forgotten History (Zed Books, 1986) Copyright © William Blum 2003 The right of William Blum to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Cover design by Andrew Corbett ISBN 1 84277 368 2 hb ISBN 1 84277 369 0 pb Spearhead ISBN 0 86486 560 0 pb 2 Contents PART I Introduction 6 1. China 1945 to 1960s: Was Mao Tse-tung just paranoid? 20 2. Italy 1947-1948: Free elections, Hollywood style 27 3. Greece 1947 to early 1950s: From cradle of democracy to client state 33 4. The Philippines 1940s and 1950s: America's oldest colony 38 5. Korea 1945-1953: Was it all that it appeared to be? 44 6. Albania 1949-1953: The proper English spy 54 7. Eastern Europe 1948-1956: Operation Splinter Factor 56 8. Germany 1950s: Everything from juvenile delinquency to terrorism 60 9. Iran 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings 63 10.
    [Show full text]
  • PIER Summer Institutes 2014 Lesson Plan for Classroom Teachers Based on the SEED Common Core of Teaching (CCT) Rubric for Effective Teaching
    PIER Summer Institutes 2014 Lesson Plan for Classroom Teachers Based on the SEED Common Core of Teaching (CCT) Rubric for Effective Teaching Title of Lesson: How Far is Too Far? Ellen H. Cohen, Metairie Park Country Day School, Spanish Language and Culture, Grades 11 and 12, 85 minute lesson Introduction: This lesson plan investigates the lengths that a government may go in protecting its interests in another country. Guatemala between the years 1900-1954 will be the example used. Geographic Connections: D1.1.9-12 Explain how a question reflects an enduring issue in the field. D1.4.9-12 Explain how supporting questions contribute to an inquiry and how, through engaging source work, new compelling and supporting questions emerge. Vocabulary: Imperialism, monopoly, revolution, coup d’état, insurrection Content Standards: CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.3 Evaluate various explanations for actions or events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves matters uncertain. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.11-12.7 Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, as well as in words) in order to address a question or solve a problem. Essential Question: How far is too far? Literacy through the Content Area: This lesson can be modified easily for use in an intermediate to advanced Spanish-language classroom. Translation of teacher materials and use of primary sources in Spanish will teach literacy, in Spanish, in the content area. Placement of Lesson within Broader Curriculum/Context: This lesson can be taught independently, but it will work best within the broader curriculum of Maya Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Justo Rufino Barrios, Perteneciente a Una Segunda Generación De Liberales Y Uno De Los Líderes De La Revuelta Contra Los Conse
    Ciclos, Año 24, Nro. 43, julio-diciembre 2014 ISSN 1851-3735 GUATEMALA EN LA MIRA: LA OPERACIÓN BPSUCCESS Ricardo Vicente* Resumen En 2014 se cumplen sesenta años del primer golpe de Estado pergeñado por la central de inteligencia estadounidense (CIA) en Latinoamérica. En ese momento histórico, en Guatemala, se ensayó un operativo modelo que luego sirvió de inspiración para otros que le sucedieron en el resto de Latinoamérica. El gobierno nacional, popular y democrático de Jacobo Árbenz Guzmán fue su víctima y los golpistas fueron coordinados y apoyados por la CIA: varios embajadores, militares reaccionarios, poderosos empresarios norteamericanos y locales y altos prelados de la Iglesia Católica. Esta conspiración incorporó a América Latina como nuevo escenario de la Guerra Fría. Palabras clave: America Latina, Guatemala, golpe, Estados Unidos Abstract In 2014 marks sixty years of the first coup concocted by the Central American Intelligence (CIA) in Latin America. In that historical moment, an operating model was tested in Guatemala, which then served as inspiration for others in the rest of Latin America. The national, popular and democratic government of Jacobo Árbenz Guzmán was its victim and the coup leaders were coordinated and supported by the CIA: several ambassadors, reactionary military, powerful American and local entrepreneurs and high prelates of the Catholic Church. This conspiracy joined Latin America as a new stage of the Cold War. Keywords: Latin America, Guatemala, coup d’État, United States * Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, profesor de la Maestría de Historia Económica y de las Políticas Económicas, investigador del IDEHESI, Ricardo Vicente, Un castillo armado: el primer golpe de la CIA en América Latina Ciclos, Año 24, Nro.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlos Castillo Armas, the United States and the 1954 Counterrevolution in Guatemala
    CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA Andres Alberto Tapia B.A., University of California, Davis, 2009 THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO FALL 2011 CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA A Thesis by Andres Alberto Tapia Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Joseph Palermo __________________________________, Second Reader Patrick Ettinger ____________________________ Date ii Student: Andres Alberto Tapia I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Mona Siegel Date Department of History iii Abstract of CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA by Andres Alberto Tapia Statement of Problem The 1954 overthrow of President Jacobo Arbenz Gúzman orchestrated by the United States has been approached by various points of view by different historians. While many aspects of the overthrow such as the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency, the influence of the United Fruit Company, and the Guatemalan government’s relation to communism have all been covered, one crucial player in the overthrow, Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas, has not gained the same critical attention. Castillo Armas acted as the counterrevolutionary the CIA chose to lead the overthrow of Arbenz therefore understanding how he received the role and how he performed his task is important to understanding this historical moment.
    [Show full text]
  • American Imperialism
    11/9/12 Study Island Lesson Prev 1 American Imperialism 2 Listed below are some of the important ideas and events 3 involving American diplomacy during the 19th and early 20th Next centuries. Monroe Doctrine President Monroe outlined his foreign policy in a speech given to Congress in 1823. This policy became known as the Monroe Doctrine. It stated that European countries would no longer be allowed to create new colonies or interfere with the affairs of independent nations in the Western Hemisphere. The United States would be willing to fight to prevent new colonies from falling under European control. This doctrine was used as justification for U.S. involvement in the affairs of various countries in Latin America. Manifest Destiny First used in a newspaper article written by John O'Sullivan in 1845, the term "Manifest Destiny" described the idea that the westward expansion of the United States was inevitable because of fate. In 1845, John O'Sullivan wrote a newspaper article on the annexation of Texas in which he said it was America's "manifest destiny to overspread the continent." The concept of Manifest Destiny was also used to justify expansion into California, Oregon, and Alaska. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, Manifest Destiny experienced a brief resurgence. Some politicians began to use the ideas of Manifest Destiny to justify expansion overseas, especially to areas of Asia, Latin American, and the Pacific. In 1898 two distinct phases of expansion occurred. The U.S. signed a resolution to annex the Republic of Hawaii, while the Treaty of Paris that ended the Spanish- American War included the acquisition of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines from Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrestricted Version
    Unrestricted Version Regional Program Plan In Support of the Regional Strategy for Central America and Mexico FY 2003-2008 The Regional Program Plan was approved by the Agency on July 19, 2004. It sets forth the Agency’s policy and strategic direction for regional programs and assistance in Central America and Mexico. Budget data contained in this document are estimates and do not represent a U.S. government commitment to provide a specific level of funding. Release Date: July 31, 2004 C O N T E N T S Page I. Rationale for Assistance and Summary Analysis of the Assistance Environment......................1 A. Summary of Regional Program Plan and Relationship to CAM Regional Strategy ...........1 B. Foreign Policy Interests and Goals in the Region...............................................................2 C. Overview of Regional Needs and Development Challenges ..............................................2 D. Regional Role of Other Donors ...........................................................................................3 E. Proposed Regional Program Plan ......................................................................................4 F. Cross-Cutting Issues...........................................................................................................5 II. Strategic Objectives ....................................................................................................................5 A. SO 2 Economic Freedom: Open, Diversified, Expanding Economies ...............................5 B. SO 3 Investing
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemalan Exiles, Caribbean Basin Dictators, Operation PBFORTUNE
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2016 Guatemalan Exiles, Caribbean Basin Dictators, Operation PBFORTUNE, and the Transnational Counter-Revolution against the Guatemalan Revolution, 1944-1952 Aaron Coy Moulton University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Latin American History Commons, and the Latin American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Moulton, Aaron Coy, "Guatemalan Exiles, Caribbean Basin Dictators, Operation PBFORTUNE, and the Transnational Counter- Revolution against the Guatemalan Revolution, 1944-1952" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1533. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1533 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Guatemalan Exiles, Caribbean Basin Dictators, Operation PBFORTUNE, and the Transnational Counter-Revolution against the Guatemalan Revolution, 1944-1952 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Aaron Moulton University of Arkansas Bachelor of Arts in Latin American Studies, Spanish, and Mathematics, 2007 University of Kansas Master of Arts in Latin American Studies, 2009 May 2016 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. __________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Background on the Guatemalan Coup of 1954
    Educational materials developed through the Baltimore County History Labs Program, a partnership between Baltimore County Public Schools and the UMBC Center for History Education. RS#01: Background on the Guatemalan Coup of 1954 Read the background on the Guatemalan coup, and complete the chart and questions at the end of the reading. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Latin American governments were characterized by economic policies that allowed for liberal foreign investments from wealthy countries like the United States. Military dictators led a number of these Latin American governments. The United Fruit Company (UFCO), an extremely successful American owned and run company, profited greatly from investments it made in Guatemala. The business of United Fruit was bananas, and from bananas it had built a business empire in the Central American nations of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. The United States government was also interested in bananas, and had sponsored initiatives to promote the fruit in the American diet. Guatemala became known as a “banana republic,” a disdainful term for poor, developing countries that relied on a single cash crop, such as bananas, and were ruled by corrupt governments. Under the Guatemalan dictator Jorge Ubico, the United Fruit Company gained control of 42% of Guatemala’s land, and was exempted from paying taxes and import duties. Seventy-seven percent of all Guatemalan exports went to the United States; and 65% of imports to the country came from the United States. The United Fruit Company was, essentially, a state within the Guatemalan state. It not only owned all of Guatemala's banana production and monopolized banana exports, it also owned the country's telephone and telegraph system, and almost all of its railroad track.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence of Territory and Human Rights in Petén: Resisting Mega Projects, a High Risk Activity
    Defence of territory and human rights in Petén: Resisting mega projects, a high risk activity Author: Eva Virgilli Recasens Coordination: Amaya de Miguel Vallés Support to the production of the report: Silvia Weber Translation: Adam Paul Lunn Published and distributed: PBI Guatemala Photos: PBI 2014-2015 Design: Rubén Carricondo June 2016 Creative Common: This work has been published under Creative Commons’s licence. It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of this publication provided it is without means of profit, the source is mentioned and PBI Guatemala is notified about the use (mail to [email protected]). PEACE BRIGADES INTERNATIONAL BRIGADAS INTERNACIONALES DE PAZ INDEX 1. Brief history: Petén, no man’s land? .................................................................................................. 4 1.1. The XX century: from state colonization to conservation ......................................... 4 1.2. The XXI century and the expansion of mega projects in the region ...................................6 2. Communities in Resistance: Laguna del Tigre and Sierra del Lacandon .......................................7 2.1. Between Forced evictions and cooperation agreements ...................................................... 7 2.2. Obstacles to defending human rights ......................................................................................11 3. Living among palm trees ....................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Banana Republics
    Creating Banana Republics Introduction Written in a yearning voice, “La United Fruit Co,” a poem by Chilean Nobel laureate Pablo Neruda, draws attention to US capitalist imperialism in Latin America. In this poem, Neruda refers pejoratively to some of the countries in Central America and the Caribbean as banana republics under the influence of several US corporations. In fact, as Neruda laments, in the 20th century, numerous South American and Caribbean countries became banana republics. The term banana republic was coined in 1904 by American writer William Sydney Porter, who wrote under the pen name O. Henry. Porter had briefly visited the north coast of Honduras and used his experiences in his book Cabbages and Kings. This novel was a collection of interwoven short stories describing the adventures and misadventures of several foreigners in an invented country in Latin America called Anchuria. In it, one of the characters explains: “At that time we had a treaty with about every foreign country except Belgium and that banana republic....” (Henry 1904) Thus, by association, a banana republic came to describe a small, tropical, and politically unstable Latin American country with an agrarian economy. Over time, the phrase had been applied to describe any Latin American countries with non-democratic governments and mono-economies under foreign control, i.e., economies in which foreign corporations have monopolistic control over one of the nation’s major natural resources. The Dawn of the Banana Trade The United States developed an interest in the banana trade in 1870, when Captain Lorenzo D. Baker brought some bananas from the Caribbean to Boston, where he was able to sell them with an exorbitant profit margin.
    [Show full text]