The Experience of Guatemalan Women Who Seek Asylum in United States Courts: a Legacy of Paternalism and Gendered Violence
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 The Experience of Guatemalan Women who Seek Asylum in United States Courts: A Legacy of Paternalism and Gendered Violence LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES HONORS THESIS Nina Harris Submitted: April 22, 2020 Defended: April 30, 2020 Advisor, First Reader: Professor Kristina Mani Other Readers: Professor Jan Cooper and Professor Patrick O’Connor 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support, guidance, and academic instruction of faculty across disciplines. First, I would like to thank Professor Kristina Mani for supporting this project from inception to conclusion. Her thoughtful critiques challenged me to take my investigation further and to think analytically about all aspects of this research. Despite the unforeseen challenges of this irregular Spring Semester, Professor Mani sustained her commitment to thoughtful examination of the research material—and to the development of my own authorial voice as a researcher. I would like to thank Professor Patrick O’Connor for his engagement with me since my freshman year. Professor O’Connor encouraged me to explore the academic curriculum at Oberlin and advised three Winter Term projects, in addition to his attention to this thesis. I am grateful to Professor Jan Cooper, who helped me think more broadly about the power and use of language in all forms. Professor Cooper has graciously provided academic and personal support throughout my time at Oberlin. I would also like to thank Professor KJ Cerankowski for their support in developing a set of resources for the feminist theory that grounded this research. Last, I would like to thank Professor Kathryn Miller, who taught the course that inspired my interest in this field over two years ago. I would also like to express my extraordinary gratitude to the staff at the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, in San Francisco. My time at CGRS last summer allowed me to expand my understanding of the asylum system, and to comprehend authentic justice for refugees and immigrants. I am grateful to Felipe Navarro and Isaac Bloch, who provided me with permission and instruction to utilize the CGRS database, shared extensive resources, and continued to answer questions and provide support throughout this academic year. Last, I would like to thank CGRS Executive Director and University of California Hastings College of Law Professor Karen Musalo for her generous mentorship. Professor Musalo guided me as I began to develop my position and arguments for this project. Her commitment to ensuring that the right to asylum remains a liberty in the United States is unmatched. Finally, I would like to express my appreciation to the Latin American Studies and Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies Departments and Faculty for your belief in the value of this research. Both departments’ multidisciplinary approach has shaped the way I engaged with this project and has had a lasting impact on my experience at Oberlin College. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Abstract _____________________________________________________________________5 II. Introduction _________________________________________________________________6 III. Chapter I—Epistemology and Methods: An Anti-colonial Feminist Understanding of Asylum _______________________________14 Feminist International Relations ___________________________________________15 From Colonialism and Coloniality to a Feminist Anti-Colonial Approach __________ 19 Methodology and Sources_________________________________________________24 IV. Chapter II—The United States and Guatemala: A History of Intervention, Instability, and Paternalism _____________________________30 The History of the U.S. Coup d’état_________________________________________34 Developing Economic Concerns and The United Fruit Company ___________34 The October Revolution and the “Ten Years of Springtime”_______________35 The 1954 Coup d’état _____________________________________________38 The Aftermath of the Coup d’état ____________________________________44 Developing Counterinsurgency and the Guatemalan Civil War ___________________46 Not a Showcase for Democracy, but a Laboratory for Repression: 1954-1963 ___ 46 The Counterinsurgency and Civil War Heighten ________________________47 The War’s Effect on Guatemalan Women ______________________________57 Moving into the 21st Century: Organized Crime and U.S. Involvement _______63 Conclusion ____________________________________________________________64 V. Chapter III—The System of Gender-Based Violence in Guatemala: Colonial Roots, Civil War Exacerbation, and an Inadequate Legal System ___________68 Types of Violence Against Women__________________________________________ 72 The Roots of Violence and The Legal Framework______________________________75 The Civil Code __________________________________________________ 75 Domestic Legal Framework ________________________________________78 Machismo_______________________________________________________82 Impunity for Crimes of Gender-Based Violence _______________________________ 85 Conclusion ____________________________________________________________89 VI. Chapter IV—The U.S. Asylum System___________________________________________ 91 Asylum Law in the United States ___________________________________________92 4 The Origins and Classification of International Asylum Policy _____________92 United States Domestic Policy ______________________________________ 93 The Adjudicatory Levels of the Asylum Process _________________________94 A Few Problems of Refugee and Asylum Law __________________________ 96 Gender-Based Asylum ___________________________________________________ 98 Conclusion __________________________________________________________ 101 VII. Chapter V—An Analysis of Asylum Decisions ___________________________________ 102 Introduction __________________________________________________________ 102 Rody Alvarado _________________________________________________ 105 Reina Izabel Garcia Martinez _____________________________________ 106 Aminita Cifuentes _______________________________________________ 107 Asylum Law Constructs and Challenges _____________________________ 108 How General Structural Problems Impact Gender-Based Asylum ________________109 The Enumerated Ground: The Use of the Term “Unable” _______________ 109 Proving Persecution_____________________________________________ 111 Nexus and Credibility: The Problems of Bias _________________________ 114 The Exaggeration of Paternalism in Guatemalan Women’s Asylum Cases _________ 117 Creating a PSG: Guatemalan Women Reposition their Claims ____________117 Proving Sufficient Inability________________________________________ 122 Defining Persecution_____________________________________________124 The Private vs. Public Sphere______________________________________ 126 Establishing Nexus_______________________________________________128 Credibility _____________________________________________________131 Framing Gender-Based Violence as Pervasive_________________________136 Rebutting Persecution, Deemphasizing Individual Harm_________________137 Conclusion: The Legacies of Colonialism___________________________________ 139 VIII. Conclusions_________________________________________________________________146 IX. Bibliography________________________________________________________________159 5 ABSTRACT Karen Musalo, a leading asylum attorney, explains, “In the United States, few refugee issues have been as controversial as that of gender asylum.” Despite perceived progress, inconsistent judicial decisions engender doubts about the viability of gender-based asylum cases. The U.S. courts continue to see violence against women as a personal or family matter rather than a pattern of accepted social behavior supported by the political and legal authorities. Using cases from Guatemalan women seeking asylum, my research scrutinizes the asylum system, and shows how the U.S. furthers a colonial, paternalistic narrative—allowing U.S. judges, adjudicators, and policymakers to decide who is worthy—or not worthy—of U.S. protection. The asylum system interacts with an embedded structure of power that disregards the impact of the historical relationship between the U.S. and Guatemala. Using a textual study of specific case documents, this paper analyzes the experience, ability, and process of seeking asylum as a method for examining the legacies of paternalism. In asylum cases, adjudicators can make decisions based on their own bias against a woman’s testimony. Judges can require women to reshape their experience to meet the provisions of the law and make rulings that deemphasize the experience of violence. My specific study of Guatemalan women seeking asylum shows how factual distortions, institutionalized prejudice, and misogyny impact the asylum process. 6 INTRODUCTION Inconsistencies in United States asylum decisions are not new, but the recent hyper- politicization of immigration policy has elevated the stakes. President Donald Trump is unabashedly anti-immigrant and has referred to immigrants as “criminals” and even “animals.”1 President Trump has insisted to the American public and to the international community that the asylum system is a “loophole.”2 To defend his perspective, he cites policies which allow unauthorized immigrants to be “caught and released” into the United States. In his election campaign, President Trump articulated plans to reduce immigration. The rallying cry of “Build the Wall!” saturated national and international media. Though the Trumpian shibboleth