DOCSLIB.ORG

Boris Nemtsov, 1959–2015: Seeking Justice, Securing His Legacy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boris Nemtsov, 1959–2015: Seeking Justice, Securing His Legacy BORIS NEMTSOV, 1959–2015: SEEKING JUSTICE, SECURING HIS LEGACY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 28, 2018 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 115–2–1] ( Available via www.csce.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–910PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:38 Apr 13, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 X:\_HS\WORK\28910.TXT NINA COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi, Co-Chairman Chairman ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas CORY GARDNER, Colorado STEVE COHEN, Tennessee MARCO RUBIO, Florida RICHARD HUDSON, North Carolina JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois THOM TILLIS, North Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas TOM UDALL, New Mexico GWEN MOORE, Wisconsin SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Vacant, Department of State Vacant, Department of Commerce Vacant, Department of Defense [II] VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:38 Apr 13, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 X:\_HS\WORK\28910.TXT NINA BORIS NEMTSOV, 1959–2015: SEEKING JUSTICE, SECURING HIS LEGACY FEBRUARY 28, 2018 COMMISSIONERS Page Hon. Roger F. Wicker, Chairman, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ..................................................... 1 Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin, Ranking Member, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ................................. 2 Hon. Jeanne Shaheen, Commissioner, Commission on Secu- rity and Cooperation in Europe .............................................. 14 Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Co-Chairman, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe ...................................... 19 Hon. Cory Gardner, Commissioner, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe WITNESSES Zhanna Nemtsova, daughter of Boris Nemtsov ........................ 3 Vladimir Kara-Murza, Chairman, Boris Nemtsov Foundation for Freedom .............................................................................. 5 Vadim Prokhorov, lawyer for the Nemtsov family ................... 7 APPENDIX Prepared statement of Hon. Roger F. Wicker ........................... 29 Prepared statement of Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin .................... 31 Prepared statement of Hon. Christopher H. Smith ................. 33 (III) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:38 Apr 13, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 0484 X:\_HS\WORK\28910.TXT NINA VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:38 Apr 13, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 0484 X:\_HS\WORK\28910.TXT NINA BORIS NEMTSOV, 1959–2015: SEEKING JUSTICE, SECURING HIS LEGACY February 28, 2018 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE WASHINGTON, DC The hearing was held at 3:32 p.m. in Room 138, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, DC, Hon. Roger F. Wicker, Chairman, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, presiding. Commissioners present: Hon. Roger F. Wicker, Chairman, Com- mission on Security and Cooperation in Europe; Hon. Benjamin L. Cardin, Ranking Member, Commission on Security and Coopera- tion in Europe; Hon. Christopher H. Smith, Co-Chairman, Commis- sion on Security and Cooperation in Europe; Hon. Jeanne Shaheen, Commissioner, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe; and Hon. Cory Gardner, Commissioner, Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Witnesses present: Zhanna Nemtsova, daughter of Boris Nemtsov; Vladimir Kara-Murza, Chairman, Boris Nemtsov Foundation for Freedom; and Vadim Prokhorov, lawyer for the Nemtsov family. HON. ROGER F. WICKER, CHAIRMAN, COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE Mr. WICKER. If it seems that Senator Cardin and I are rushing, it’s because we have a lot to do in an hour. Senator Cardin and I have a series of votes that begin at 4:30. I don’t know if any House members are expected today, but Senator Cardin and I will have some brief comments and then we’ll get to our witnesses. We’re turning our attention in today’s hearing to the loss of one of Russia’s great democratic reformers, Boris Nemtsov, who was gunned down within sight of the Kremlin three years ago yester- day. Although the triggermen were apprehended and tried for their crime, the masterminds behind it have never been identified. Our witnesses today are people who knew Boris Nemtsov well. I stood behind them yesterday at the ceremony to rename a section of Wis- consin Avenue as Boris Nemtsov Plaza. I am very pleased that this hearing will focus on the legacy of Boris Nemtsov as Russians pre- pare to cast their votes in another presidential election next month. We are honored to have his daughter, Ms. Zhanna Nemtsova, join us and reflect on her father’s work and the prospects for real- izing his dream of a free and democratic Russia. Ms. Nemtsova is joined by someone who is no stranger to members of the Helsinki Commission nor in the halls of Congress, thanks to his tireless and (1) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:38 Apr 13, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 X:\_HS\WORK\28910.TXT NINA 2 courageous work for democracy in Russia. Mr. Vladimir Kara- Murza knows better than almost anyone about the intense and all- too-often lethal pressure being applied to brave Russians like him and Boris Nemtsov, who engage in opposition politics. Mr. Kara- Murza directed the documentary film, ‘‘Nemtsov,’’ a truly remark- able tribute to Boris, which opened in Nizhny Novgorod, and was screened in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Washington, where many people in the room had a chance to see it. We’re also very fortunate to have Mr. Vadim Prokhorov, the lawyer for the Nemtsov family, who’s worked for years now to see the masterminds of this heinous act brought to justice. As I mentioned, yesterday our witnesses participated in the nam- ing ceremony for the Boris Nemtsov Plaza. As an American, I’m proud that Washington held the very first such official memorial of Boris Nemtsov anywhere in the world. The Russian people should know that we will continue to build legislative monuments to their heroes here, until stone monuments can be built in Russia. Let me offer a word about the posters on display at the front of the room. They serve as a reminder that brave Russians have gath- ered on a regular basis to ask for justice for Boris Nemtsov. The photo of these flowers at the site of his murder could have been taken virtually any day in the past three years. Despite being re- moved every day the flowers are always replaced by the many peo- ple who revere the memory of Boris Nemtsov. I think these people deserve to be recognized for their devotion to democracy in Russia, and for their dedication to honoring one of Russia’s great demo- cratic leaders. I’ll place the rest of my statement in the record and recognize my colleague and dear friend Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland. Senator Cardin. HON. BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, RANKING MEMBER, COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE Mr. CARDIN. Well, first, let me thank our Chairman, Senator Wicker, for calling this hearing. Senator Wicker’s been one of the great champions in the United States Senate on human rights. And we’re very proud of his leadership here on the Helsinki Commis- sion. And it’s very appropriate that we have this hearing in regards to Boris Nemtsov. I just really want to put this in context, Mr. Chairman, if I might. And that is, in Russia Mr. Putin uses an asymmetric arse- nal of weapons in order to control his country, to oppress his peo- ple, and to interfere with the democratic principles of countries in Europe, and, as we’ve seen, in the United States in our 2016 elec- tions. So this is a pattern of conduct. And I mentioned that we issued a report, and Damian Murphy of the Senate Foreign Rela- tions Committee is here. He spent a year of his life writing this re- port on Mr. Putin and what he does in Russia, and the tools that he uses to compromise our way of life. He uses his military. We know that. We saw that in Ukraine. We see that in Georgia and Moldova. He uses financing of fringe par- ties. We’ve seen that in several countries, including France, financ- ing a coup in Montenegro, cyberattacks in the United States, mis- information in Germany and the U.K., support for fringe groups, VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:38 Apr 13, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 X:\_HS\WORK\28910.TXT NINA 3 including corruption—he uses corruption of his oligarchs in Russia in order to finance his own operations, but then gets involved in corrupt enterprises in other countries, as has been documented in Italy and elsewhere, uses energy as a tool, which we saw, again, in Ukraine. I mention all that because he also uses murder. He also uses in- timidation against his own people. And Boris Nemtsov was a victim of that violence. And it’s very appropriate that we have this hear- ing. Mr. Chairman, I recall how Boris joined me for the screening of ‘‘Justice for Sergei’’ in November 2010, and almost immediately after was assaulted at the airport upon returning to Russia. He helped us in getting justice for Sergei Magnitsky, who was also a victim of Mr. Putin’s violence in Russia. So this is not an isolated example. We have not yet had justice for Mr. Nemtsov. We know that the gunman who shot four bullets into Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OPERATION NEMTSOV”: 307 Disinformation, Confusion MARCH and Some Worrying Hypotheses 2015
    Centro de Estudios y Documentación InternacionalesCentro de Barcelona E-ISSN 2014-0843 D.L.: B-8438-2012 opiniónEuropa “OPERATION NEMTSOV”: 307 Disinformation, confusion MARCH and some worrying hypotheses 2015 Nicolás de Pedro, Research Fellow, CIDOB Marta Ter, Head of the North Caucasus department at the Lliga dels Drets dels Pobles he investigation into the assassination of Boris Nemtsov reminds previ- ous ones on high-profile political killings, although the uncertainties grow with every new revelation. The verified, documented connec- Ttion between the main suspect, Zaur Dadayev, and Ramzan Kadyrov, Chechen strongman and close ally of Putin strengthens the theory linking the crime to the Kremlin and suggests possible internal fighting within the state security apparatus. Nemtsov joins a long list of critics and opponents who have been assassinated in the last fifteen years. Among the most prominent are:Sergey Yushenkov, member of parliament for the Liberal Russia party (assassinated on April 17th, 2003); Yuri Shchekochikhin, journalist on the Novaya Gazeta (July 3rd, 2003); Paul Klebnikov, US journalist of Russian origin and editor of the Russian edition of Forbes (July 9th, 2004); Anna Politkovskaya, journalist for Novaya Gazeta (October 7th, 2006); Alexander Litvinenko, former KGB/FSB agent (November 23rd, 2006); and Na- talya Estemirova, human rights activist for the Chechen branch of the NGO Me- morial (July 15th, 2009). Each of these assassinations has its own particularities, but none has been properly explained and all of the victims were people who dis- comfited the Kremlin. Despite this, political motivations and possible connections with state apparatus are the only lines of investigation that have been systemati- cally ignored or explicitly denied in all of these cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Boris Nemtsov 27 February 2015 Moscow, Russia
    Boris Nemtsov 27 February 2015 Moscow, Russia the fight against corruption, embezzlement and fraud, claiming that the whole system built by Putin was akin to a mafia. In 2009, he discovered that one of Putin’s allies, Mayor of Moscow City Yury Luzhkov, BORIS and his wife, Yelena Baturina, were engaged in fraudulent business practices. According to the results of his investigation, Baturina had become a billionaire with the help of her husband’s connections. Her real-estate devel- opment company, Inteco, had invested in the construction of dozens of housing complexes in Moscow. Other investors were keen to part- ner with Baturina because she was able to use NEMTSOV her networks to secure permission from the Moscow government to build apartment build- ings, which were the most problematic and It was nearing midnight on 27 February 2015, and the expensive construction projects for developers. stars atop the Kremlin towers shone with their charac- Nemtsov’s report revealed the success of teristic bright-red light. Boris Nemtsov and his partner, Baturina’s business empire to be related to the Anna Duritskaya, were walking along Bolshoy Moskovo- tax benefits she received directly from Moscow retsky Bridge. It was a cold night, and the view from the City government and from lucrative govern- bridge would have been breathtaking. ment tenders won by Inteco. A snowplough passed slowly by the couple, obscuring the scene and probably muffling the sound of the gunshots fired from a side stairway to the bridge. The 55-year-old Nemtsov, a well-known Russian politician, anti-corrup- tion activist and a fierce critic of Vladimir Putin, fell to the ground with four bullets in his back.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Aggression Against Ukraine and the West’S Policy Response
    The Senate Foreign Relations Committee Subcommittee on Europe and Regional Security Cooperation Statement for the Record Russian Aggression against Ukraine and the West’s Policy Response Steven Pifer Senior Fellow, Center on the United States and Europe The Brookings Institution March 4, 2015 1 Russian Aggression against Ukraine and the West’s Policy Response Introduction Mr. Chairman, Senator Shaheen, distinguished members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify on Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, and the U.S. and West’s policy response. What began as an internal Ukrainian political dispute became a Ukraine-Russia crisis in early 2014. Since then, Moscow has used military force to seize Crimea, supported armed separatists and ultimately sent regular Russian army units into eastern Ukraine. A ceasefire agreement was reached in Minsk last September, but the separatists and Russians failed to implement its terms. The Minsk II ceasefire agreed on February 12 may now be taking effect but seems fragile at best. Implementing other terms of the agreement will prove difficult. Driving Russia’s aggression has been a mix of geopolitical and domestic political considerations. The Kremlin’s goal over the past year appears to have been to destabilize and distract the Ukrainian government, in order keep that government from addressing its pressing economic, financial and other challenges as well as from drawing closer to the European Union through implementation of the EU-Ukraine association agreement. Beyond Ukraine, the United States and Europe face a broader Russia problem. Moscow has operated its military forces in a more provocative manner near NATO members and has asserted a right to “protect” ethnic Russians and Russian speakers wherever they are located and whatever their citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom's New Weakness Offers Opportunity by Anders Åslund
    CASE Network E-briefs 6/2009 June 2009 Gazprom's New Weakness Offers Opportunity By Anders Åslund Gazprom has gone from being a great commercial hope Gazprom also lacks a comparative advantage in the to an ailing giant. Gazprom's owners need to face up to transportation of gas. No other company has so many the crisis and institute reforms. explosions on major pipelines. Moreover, Gazprom is notorious for including shady intermediaries, which A year ago, Gazprom was the third‐most valuable later prompt the company to shut off its deliveries. company in the world with a market capitalization of over $350 billion. Today, it has shrunk by two‐thirds to Finally, few companies procure at more excessive about $120 billion, declining to become the world's prices. When Gazprom built Blue Stream, Hermitage 40th‐largest company, even though it still accounts for Capital Management showed that Gazprom's cost per about 20 percent of Russia's market capitalization and kilometer of pipeline was three times greater than on roughly 10 percent of its gross domestic product. the Turkish side. This seems to be a standard excess cost for Gazprom. In the first quarter, the country's gas exports plunged by 56 percent from last year, compelling Gazprom to cut its Gazprom's only comparative advantage is its control of production ever more. During the first 10 days of May, it one‐quarter of the world's gas reserves, but these plummeted by 34 percent. Even in the fourth quarter of reserves do not actually belong to the company. They 2008 ‐‐ when production, exports and prices were still are only licenses granted by the government.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA WATCH No.2, August 2000 Graham T
    RUSSIA WATCH No.2, August 2000 Graham T. Allison, Director Editor: Ben Dunlap Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project Production Director: Melissa C..Carr John F. Kennedy School of Government Researcher: Emily Van Buskirk Harvard University Production Assistant: Emily Goodhue SPOTLIGHT ON RUSSIA’S OLIGARCHS On July 28 Russian President Vladimir Putin met with 21 of Russia’s most influ- ential businessmen to “redefine the relationship between the state and big busi- ness.” At that meeting, Putin assured the tycoons that privatization results would remained unchallenged, but stopped far short of offering a general amnesty for crimes committed in that process. He opened the meeting by saying: “I only want to draw your attention straightaway to the fact that you have yourselves formed this very state, to a large extent through political and quasi-political structures under your control.” Putin assured the oligarchs that recent investi- The Kremlin roundtable comes at a crucial time for the oligarchs. In the last gations were not part of a policy of attacking big business, but said he would not try to restrict two months, many of them have found themselves subjects of investigations prosecutors who launch such cases. by the General Prosecutor’s Office, Tax Police, and Federal Security Serv- ice. After years of cozying up to the government, buying up the state’s most valuable resources in noncompetitive bidding, receiving state-guaranteed loans with little accountability, and flouting the country’s tax laws with imp u- nity, the heads of some of Russia’s leading financial-industrial groups have been thrust under the spotlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam As a Tool of the Kremlin?
    Notes de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Visions 99 Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam as a Tool of the Kremlin? Marlène LARUELLE March 2017 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the few French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European and broader international debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. This text is published with the support of DGRIS (Directorate General for International Relations and Strategy) under “Observatoire Russie, Europe orientale et Caucase”. ISBN: 978-2-36567-681-6 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2017 How to quote this document: Marlène Laruelle, “Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam as a Tool of the Kremlin?”, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 99, Ifri, March 2017. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel.: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Ifri-Bruxelles Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 1000—Brussels—BELGIUM Tel.: +32 (0)2 238 51 10—Fax: +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan).
    [Show full text]
  • CORRUPTION PIPELINE: the Threat of Nord Stream 2 to EU Security and Democracy
    CORRUPTION PIPELINE: the threat of Nord Stream 2 to EU Security and Democracy Ilya Zaslavskiy Ilya Zaslavskiy | Corruption Pipeline: The Threat of Nord Stream 2 to EU Security and Democracy | Free Russia Foundation, 2017 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 NS2 AS A TOOL OF KREMLIN’S POLITICAL INFLUENCE AGAINST NEIGHBORS AND CORRUPTION 4 ACTUAL RESULTS OF NORD STREAM 1 7 ROOTS OF GAZPROM’S APPEASEMENT IN EUROPE 10 IMPLICATIONS OF NS2 FOR WESTERN POLICY-MAKERS 16 Corruption Pipeline: The Threat of Nord Stream 2 CONTENTS to EU Security and Democracy I. INTRODUCTION his paper is a continuation of publications on security architecture. This Moscow-led pipeline Tthe Kremlin’s subversive activity in Europe seemingly being served as a free and lucrative prepared by Free Russia Foundation. The first gift to European energy corporations in reality paper, The Kremlin’s Gas Games in Europe, comes at the expense of taxpayers and the published jointly with the Atlantic Council, reasonable long-term development of gas looked at Gazprom’s overall current tactics in resources in Russia. Nord Stream 1 and 2 have Europe, including its pipeline plans, energy already started bringing the Kremlin’s business propaganda, and other policies.1 However, after practices and political cooptation to Europe, and our presentations in the US and Europe earlier they will further undermine EU aspirations for this year,2 we realized that a separate paper better governance, democratic institutions and specifically focused on certain aspects of Nord security. Stream 2 was required. To understand why this development is accepted Gazprom and its Western partners that are slated in Germany, and meets with weak and confused to benefit from Nord Stream 2 are aggressively resistance in the EU, it is important to look at advancing the pipeline as a purely commercial the roots of the friendship between big Western project that will only bring benefits to Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 132 March 2019
    Romanov News Новости Романовых By Ludmila & Paul Kulikovsky №132 March 2019 The monument to the Royal Martyrs at the St. Seraphim Cathedral in Vyatka "For the first time in 100 years, a descendant of the Romanovs appeared in Vyatka" From 17 to 20 of March the great-great-grandson of Alexander III, the great-grandson of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna - the sister of Emperor Nicholas II - Paul E. Kulikovsky and his wife Ludmila visited Vyatka. They were invited by the regional public organization "Revival of Vyatka". Paul E. Kulikovsky - "Kirov, or Vyatka as we prefer to call the city, was one of the places on our "to-visit-list", as we want to visit all the places in Russia directly related to the Romanovs, and especially those in which the Romanovs were in exile after the revolution. That is why first of all were visited Romanov related locations and city landmarks. But for the local citizens the main event was a presentation of the book of memoirs of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna “25 Chapters of my life”, followed by a press- conference. City history The city is actually called Kirov - in honour of one of the Stalin co- workers – Sergei Kirov killed in 1934 – but many citizens still use the historical name Vyatka. It was established in 1174. From 1457 to 1780 it was called Khlynov, from 1780 to 1934 Vyatka, and now Kirov. It is the administrative centre of the Kirov region and located on the Vyatka River, 896 km northeast of Moscow. Population is about 507,155 (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Place-Names of 'Hidden' Or 'Indirect' Scottish Origin
    Russian place-names of ‘hidden’ or ‘indirect’ Scottish origin (the case of Hamilton – Khomutov) Alexander Pavlenko and Galina Pavlenko In Russia there are numerous toponyms going back to personal or place names of western European origins. This phenomenon resulted from several waves of massive immigration from the West, first to Muscovite Rus’ and later, in greater numbers, to the Russian Empire. Among the immigrants, most of whom originated from Germany, there was quite a number of Scotsmen – active participants in all the major historical events in both Western and Eastern Europe. The first Scotsmen in Russia, called Shkotskie Nemtsy (literally ‘Scottish Germans’) by locals, belonged to the military class and came to this country either as mercenaries or prisoners of war in the late sixteenth century in the reign of Ivan the Terrible. Most of them were captured during the Livonian War and continued their military service in the Russian troops (Anderson 1990: 37). In the seventeenth century with the accession of the Romanovs dynasty to the throne, Scotsmen started to arrive in Russia in ever increasing numbers. Some of those who abandoned their motherland, driven by circumstances managed to inscribe their names in Russian history as prominent soldiers, engineers, doctors, architects, etc. Scottish mercenaries and adventurers considered the remote Russian lands to be a place where they could build their career and hopefully make a fortune. Of course, as is well known, Russia was only one of a multitude of destinations which Scotsmen sought to reach. The late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries saw a more abundant influx of Scots due to the Petrine reforms and a high demand for foreign professionals in all fields (Dukes 1987: 9–23; Cross 1987: 24–46).
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Secretary Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade PO Box 6021 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600, Australia
    Committee Secretary Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade PO Box 6021 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600, Australia 30 January 2020 Dear Members of the Committee, It is my privilege to write to you as part of your ongoing Parliamentary inquiry in strong support of the passage of legislation comparable to the United States Magnitsky Act of 2012. By way of brief background, I am a Russian journalist, historian, and political activist, and was a candidate for the Russian Parliament representing the pro-democracy opposition. For more than fifteen years, I had the honour of working with the late Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov, and I currently chair the Boris Nemtsov Foundation for Freedom. Below this letter you will find an addendum with a more detailed biography for your reference. On 31 December 2019, Russia marked two decades under Vladimir Putin’s rule. An entire generation has grown up not knowing any other ruler or political reality. These years have been marked, above all, by the dismantling of political freedoms and of our country’s nascent democratic institutions. Freedom of the media has been the first target of Mr. Putin’s regime, with all independent nationwide television channels shut down or taken over within the first three years. Today, Russian television – still the primary source of information for the majority of citizens – provides a continuous propaganda drumbeat, with laudatory coverage of the authorities and with attacks on the Kremlin’s opponents who are denounced as “traitors” and “foreign agents”. Indeed, “foreign agent” is now an official designation, introduced by a recent law designed to target non-governmental organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Opportunities, Barriers and Enablers of Nature-Based Solutions in Russia the REACT Programme’S UK–Russia Exchange on Climate Change Transition
    Report Scoping opportunities, barriers and enablers of nature-based solutions in Russia The REACT programme’s UK–Russia exchange on climate change transition Paul Sayers, Olena Borodyna, Beatrice Tanjangco and Alexandra Didcock March 2021 Readers are encouraged to reproduce material for their own publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. ODI requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. For online use, we ask readers to link to the original resource on the ODI website. The views presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of ODI or our partners. This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. How to cite: Sayers, P.B., Borodyna, O., Tanjangco, B. and Didcock, A. (2021) Scoping opportunities, barriers and enablers of nature-based solutions in Russia: the REACT programme’s UK–Russia exchange on climate change transition. London: ODI (www.odi.org/publications/ 17998-scoping-opportunities-barriers-and-enablers-nature-based-solutions-russia). Cover photo: River Pra, Meshchera. © EIPC Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of experts from the Environmental Industrial Policy Centre (EIPC) in arranging our participation in several federal, regional and sectoral events in Russia, and the contribution of the attendees. The authors also thank the internal ODI peer reviewers, Rebecca Nadin, Sarah Colenbrander and Sarah Opitz-Stapleton. About the authors ORCID numbers are given where available. Please click on the ID icon next to an author's name in order to access their ORCID listing. Paul Sayers Senior Research Associate within the ODI Global Risks and Resilience programme and a partner at the applied research consultancy Sayers and Partners LLP.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the American Historical Society of Germans from Russia
    Journal of the American Historical Society of Germans from Russia Vol. 13, No. 2 Summer 1990 COVER PHOTO: Franz Ullrich and Marie Elisabeth Dinkelacker. The picture was taken in Neu-Messer, circa 1913. Depicted left to right are: unknown boy, Franz Ullrich, unknown child, Marie Elisabeth (Dinkelacker) Ullrich, unknown man and child. INDEX THE TIES THAT BIND—THE DINKELACKER LETTERS...................……………….…..... 1 William Seibel THE BEGINNING OF AN ODYSSEY Ella (Wasemiller) and Werner K. Wadewitz............................................………………………………………........ 12 ETHNIC WOMEN HOMESTEADING ON THE PLAINS OF NORTH DAKOTA H. Elaine Lindgren ........................................................................………………………………...…… 15 SUFFERINGS OF THE FIRST GERMAN COLONISTS DURING THE FIRST TWO DECADES, 1764 TO 1784 John Erbes ..........................................................................………………………………………..…… 26 THE TREK OF 1921-1922 Glenn Mueller ......................................................................……………………………………………….………..... 29 VILLAGE LIFE Alex Bauer ...............................................………………………………………………….............…...... 34 RESTING IN PEACE V. Krasnovsky ........................................................……………………………………………………………...…...... 37 KUKKUS, ONCE . AND TODAY Reinhold Keil................................................................……………………………………………………………..….. 38 DONATIONS TO AHSGR LIBRARY ....................................……………………………………....… 39 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CREATION OF
    [Show full text]