The Historical Process of the Two Constitutions in Ireland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Historical Process of the Two Constitutions in Ireland ௐ 3 ഇ! ࢱ 57-81! 2019 ѐ/ࡌ؞ཱི !ס έ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώ! ௐ 15 Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 57-81 Autumn 2019 愛爾蘭兩部憲法的歷史進程 ࡰ஽ܲ ૩̋ࡊԫ̂ጯઘିચܜ ၡ ࢋ Ą1922 ѐߏдຑႬᜋڱຑႬᜋд 1922 ѐͽ̈́ 1937 ѐЧѣ˘ొጳ ĻĄڱؠ˞˘ొ·႕ࡻ઼О੃۞ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳטҋϤ֣۞֗Њ˭Ă ࡻ۞̚ڱѐ۞ 15 ѐมĂຑႬᜋు႙ᕚ௲ҋϤ֣ጳ 1937 זଂ 1922 ѐ ९Ļڱѐ۞ĺຑႬᜋВ׶઼ 1948 זۡ˘Ąڱؠ˞າ۞ጳט৵Ă઼̮ ܜјڱࡻ઼үࠎຑႬᜋ΃நˠ۞ܑᇈĄ఺ቔኢ͛ଂ఺׌ొጳ˞̖ͤ̚ ؠטڱజതϔ઼छдጳژ።Ϋซ඀Ăͽ̈́׎ٙ΃ܑ۞পঅӣཌྷĂ̶۞ ԼតĄڱγ˧̒ᕘĂͽ̈́િૻ઼୉ᄮТٙ૲ֽ۞ጳ۞צ࿅඀̚ᅮٚ ९ڱᙯᔣෟĈຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ăࡻຑ୧ࡗăຑႬᜋВ׶઼ ăௐ 3 ഇĞ2019/ࡌ؞ཱིğס Įέ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώįௐ 15 58 壹、前言 ன̫೼࿆ᄮۢ۞ຑႬᜋफ˯̶јຑႬᜋВ׶઼ĞࡗҫБफࢬ᎕۞̶̱ ࡻ઼۞ΔຑႬᜋĞࡗҫБफ۞̶̱̝ٺΔొᔴᛳڌğͽ̈́дຑႬᜋफ̣̝ ຑႬᜋफ˯۞ᄮۢݒ̙ߏ఺ᇹĄдགྷ።˞ 700ٺğĄ൒҃Ă100 ѐ݈၆˘ Ă1916 ѐ۞ೇ߿༼੓ཌྷߏҋຑႬᜋ 1798ޢͽ̙̈́ᕝ۞ͅԩڼкѐ۞ࡻ઼௚ Ķࡻ઼۞П፟ಶߏຑႬᜋ۞ᖼ፟ķĂ༊ܫ྅ྻજĄિڠ౵ࢦࢋ۞ޢѐ੓ཌྷ ޢࡻ઼ણᄃௐ˘Ѩ͵ࠧ̂ጼॡӈ೩ֻ˞ຑႬᜋ੓ཌྷ۞፟ົĄ൒҃Ă̱͇̝ ຑႬـ֏Ăజᄮࠎߏ఼ކ༼ᗉᑅĂ࢕ְ˯ԆБεୀĂҭ˵൴ܑ˞ೇ߿זዎ ޙຑႬᜋٙᓝҖ۞ᏴᓝĂ༊͹ૺ۞ޢᜋВ׶઼۞ࢦࢋ֧඀༫Ąೇ߿༼੓ཌྷ ᛨĞSinn Féinğᛏ଀߆ᝋĂ֭ͷኚϠ˞ 1922 ѐĺຑ܆ϲຑႬᜋВ׶઼۞າ ᛨд 1932 ѐεΝ߆ᝋĂజ܆າޢĻĄд።གྷ 10 ѐ۞ે߆ڱႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ٺᙯ̚ڱ΃Ăд࣒ጳ۞࿅඀̚ຑႬᜋВ׶ᛨుՎᆿੵጳפຑႬᜋВ׶ᛨٙ Ąڱؠາ۞ጳטѐ 1937 ٺ෪ᇈĂ֭۞ވࡻ઼ͳ ።Ϋซ඀ĄϤ۞ڱຑႬᜋ 1922 ѐͽ̈́ 1937 ѐ׌ొጳٺ఺ቔኢ͛඾ࢦ ăטጳ߆វ̝ڱԛј̝ॡ۩ࡦഀЧளĂЧ઼ጳڱЧ઼ۤົ୧І̙ТĂጳٺ ЈăۤົయЇඈఢቑӮЧѣ׎পঅ҂ณĂܫି؟ᝋ˧ඕၹăˠϔᝋӀٕߏ ୧͛ࠎ͹คҬͼྵᙱࠎέ៉࠹ᙯᛉᗟ೩΍ኢࢗĄࠖѩĂඊ۰ڱ࣐ͽଣ੅ጳ ୧ٕ͛ߏጳ߆௡ᖐઇ࿅кྚ۞ڱдѩቔኢ̙֭͛̚ົ੫၆ຑႬᜋ׌ొጳ ԛј۞።Ϋࡦഀͽ̈́পঅӣཌྷĂ֭ྏဦڱд఺׌ొጳٸᛖĂώኢ͛൏ᕇ૟ ጳ࿅඀ֽͅߍజതϔ઼छ۞ೌݖ൑؉ͽ̈́િૻ઼୉ᄮТٙ૲טᖣϤຑႬᜋ ԼតĄ۞ֽ 貳、律法演變中的英愛關係 ଂҘ̮ 1171 ѐᘲ੺ିົᆿੵ˞ຑႬᜋ੼ͳᝋĞHigh Kingship of Ăࡻॾᜋ۞઼ͳд၁ኳ˯ಶߏຑႬޢIrelandğĂྋ೸˞ຑႬᜋ۞Οҁͳ઼ ຑႬᜋĄ1541 ѐຑႬᜋᛉڼᜋ۞͹ᝋ෪ᇈĂ֭ͽᅳ͹Ğlordshipğ۞̶֗௚ ९ĻĞCrown of Ireland Act 1542ğĂଂѩຑႬᜋڱވ఼࿅˞ĺຑႬᜋͳົ ።Ϋซ඀ 59۞ڱຑႬᜋ׌ొጳ ඕЪд˘੓ĞWikipedia 2019ağĄ၆ܮᅳ͹гҜᄃࡻ઼઼ͳ఺׌࣎ᐝᅟ۞ ९ĻඈТڱވȈˣ͵ࡔٙᎸ੓۞ຑႬᜋϔ୉͹ཌྷ۰҃֏ĂѩĺຑႬᜋͳٺ ڠĂຑႬᜋˠ۞ͅԩ֭Ϗ௣ͤĄ1798 ѐ۞˭̝ڼĄдࡻॾᜋ۞௚ڱӌ׀ٺ ९ĻĞAct of Union 1801ğĄڱĂมତ๊ܳ˞ 1801 ѐ۞ĺᓑ༖ޢ྅Җજεୀ ࡻٺ९Ļ۞ϫ۞ߏдᆿੵຑႬᜋᛉົĂ֭ϤຑႬᜋ۞ 134 Щјࣶڱĺᓑ༖ ෴ைͽ̈́ᙑᄃܛன۞ع९Ļдࡻ઼߆ڱᛉੰ̚΃ܑຑႬᜋĄѩĺᓑ༖˭઼ ၷ᜖˭ĂдຑႬᜋᛉົ̚ͽ 158 ை၆ 115 ை఼࿅ĞWikipedia, 2019b; Encyclopedia Britannica, 2009ğĄ ˝ᓏ঎̪̙അઃͤĄଂȈ۞ڼĂຑႬᜋࢋՐҋޢˢࡻ઼׀дຑႬᜋజ ९ĻĞHome Rule BillsğĂѩҋڱڼࡔϐฟؕĂຑႬᜋଯ΍࿅αѨ۞ĺҋ͵ ϲຑႬᜋБ઼ᛉົĂ่঻ొ̶Αਕдࡻ઼઼ົćᆿੵ 1801ޙજϫ۞дྻڼ ϲ˘࣎ҋࡻ઼ԆБ፾ϲ۞ຑႬᜋޙğć˧ڠ९ĻĞυࢋॡֹϡڱѐĺᓑ༖ ڼछĂࡻຑ׌઼В఼ᕇ่ߏѣВТ۞Ӗ͹Ą1886 ѐॡௐ˘ొĺຑႬᜋҋ઼ ९Ļдࡻ઼˭ᛉੰజӎՙć1893 ѐॡࡻ઼˭ᛉੰ఼࿅۞ௐ˟ొĺຑႬᜋڱ ९Ļд 1914 ఼࿅Ăڱڼ९ĻĂҭд˯ᛉੰజӎՙćௐˬొĺຑႬᜋҋڱڼҋ ڼݒЯࠎௐ˘Ѩ͵ࠧ̂ጼᇶॡͤ̚Ąତ඾ߏ 1916 ѐ۞ೇ߿༼੓ཌྷĂጱ࡭ҋ ;९ଂϏϠड़ĞLloyd 1998: 505-14ڱڼజଯᏵĂೱ֏̝Ăྍҋޘ९Гڱ Wikipedia, 2018cğĄ ѐ 1920 ٺ९ڱ९̚జ၁ኹĂྍڱڼࢋՐ౵௣дௐαొҋ۞ڼຑႬᜋҋ ९ĻĞGovernment of Ireland Act 1920ğĄனдԧࣇڱع࿴ҶࠎĺຑႬᜋ߆ ९Ļ̚ݒڱڼΔຑႬᜋᄃຑႬᜋВ׶઼д 1920 ѐ۞ĺຑႬᜋҋ۞ײ௫ၚჍ ፟ၹâइఢቑ˞ྍڼ९ఢؠ˞ຑႬᜋ۞׌इ̙ТҋڱĄྍײߏтѩჍ̙ ΔొజჍࠎΔຑႬᜋ۞гડĂΩ˘इ݋ఢቑྍफ۞׎ዶొ̶ĂჍࠎݑڌफ ѐĶ౫໭ķĞtroublesğ 1972 ז፟ၹ˘ۡྻүڼຑႬᜋĞтဦ 1ğĄΔຑႬᜋ۞ҋ ፟ၹଂϏઇࠎ˘࣎ѣड़۞ྻүĂ֭ڼĂઃͤྻүĄ҃ݑຑႬᜋ۞ҋޢᘕ൴ ΃ĞThe Irish Rising, 2010ğĄפѐజຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ٙ 1922 ٺ ăௐ 3 ഇĞ2019/ࡌ؞ཱིğס Įέ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώįௐ 15 60 फ़ֽ໚ĈWikipediaĞ2019dğĄྤ ဦ 1ċݑΔຑႬᜋ ९Ļ૟ຑႬᜋफထ̶ࠎݑຑႬᜋ׶ΔຑႬᜋ఺׌࣎ڱع༊ĺຑႬᜋ߆ ᙱநྋҫ˞̶̱̝̣ຑႬᜋफࢬ᎕۞г͞ޝ૞ѣЩෟॡĂ᝝۰౅࿅ဦ 1 ᑕ ౣజჍࠎĶݑຑႬᜋķĞѣᕇညາΔͽݑ۞έ៉జჍࠎĶݑέ៉ķ˘ᇹğĄ ຏ۞Ĉࡻ઼̙ਕୂ૱ܧຑႬᜋٙ΃ܑ۞ӣཌྷߏٺ၆ع९ͅߍ΍ࡻ઼߆ڱѩ ९ٙჍ۞ҋڱĄѩ̝ײΞͽϡຑႬᜋБЩჍعຑႬᜋफ˯ѣ˘࣎߆צତ វع׶ఱ။ඈĂ̪ᛳࡻ઼ᝋ˧Ą߆ٽĂдঘ઼̈́֨׶γϹְચĂ઼ᅫ෶ڼ ր۞౵੼ᝋ˧፟ၹߏຑႬᜋᓁ༛ĞLord Lieutenant of IrelandğĂߏຑႬᜋ׌ ந۞ڱгડ۞Ӗ͹΃ܑĄ఺჌ඕၹ௑Ъΐो̂׶፫̂Ӏֲതϔгጳڼ࣎ҋ ᓁ༛Ăͷ၆ᛉົ՟ѣநኢ˯۞యЇĄٺኢĂϺӈᝋ˧ᛳ ѐ 11 ͡ 11 ͟ᒔ଀ࡻ 1920 ٺ९ڱĂᄮࠎ఺࣎ژ९୧̶͛ڱߏಶ่ڍт ९ߏຑႬᜋˠ۞੠ՐϫᇾĂົயϠڱڼкᇴԲࣞĂಶᄮࠎ఺࣎ҋ̂ົ઼઼ ͡ Ăࡻ઼д 5ޢѐ 4 ͡۞ೇ߿༼੓ཌྷĂд࢕ְ߿જεୀ̝ 1916 זᄱྋĄа ᑂຑႬᜋ۞ݔใĂҭݒֹ଀ຑޱ఍ՙ˞ధк۞ݔใЊ̄Ąࡻ઼ຐᖣѩᓝֽ ።Ϋซ඀ 61۞ڱຑႬᜋ׌ొጳ ᛨ܆Ⴌᜋϔி၆ࡻ઼෸ֽ෸ᇲෛĄ1918 ѐ 12 ͡۞ຑႬᜋᛉົᏴᓝĂາ ĞSinnFéinğᛏ଀˞˭ᛉੰ 105 ࣎ຑႬᜋयҜ̚۞ 73 ࣎यҜĄ఺̙࣎അд ϲຑႬᜋВ׶઼ޙЯ͹ૺޢ࿅ΝᏴᓝ̚ѣ͹ጱгҜ۞߆ᛨĂдೇ߿༼੓ཌྷ ڒ೻ୂ೻প۞ࡻ઼ᛉົĂ҃ߏᏴፄдౌߦރᛨ١඗ٚᄮ܆ᛏ଀ᏴᓝĄາ҃ ᛨ۞ 27 Щ΃ܑĞѣೀҜЯ߇൑܆፟ၹĄ1919 ѐ 1 ͡າڱϲ˘࣎፾ϲ۞ϲޙ ຑႬᜋிᛉੰĄ۞ب˘јϲ˞ௐڒણΐĂ׎ዶ 30 кҜ̪జႾ༰ğдౌߦڱ ކοຑႬᜋ፾ϲĂԲࣞ˞ 1916 ѐೇ߿༼੓ཌྷ൴Ҷ۞ຑႬᜋВ׶઼ކ΁ࣇ ;Ğ่ዋϡҋ 1919 Ҍ 1922ğĞKeane, 2004-2006: 136ڱ֏Ă఼࿅˞ᓜॡጳ Wikipedia, 2019eğĂ൴ܑ˞ĺຑႬᜋ፾ϲކ֏ĻĞIrish Declaration of Independence, 1919ğăͽ̈́ĺග͵ࠧҋϤ઼छ۞ੈिĻĞMessage to the Free Nations of the World, 1919ğĞWikipedia, 2019f, 2019gğĈ 愛爾蘭民族按理是一個自由的民族。七百年來,愛爾蘭人民從未停 止拒絕、並一再抗議反對外國篡奪。而英國在這個國家的統治一直 是以武力和欺詐為基礎,並且藉由軍事佔領而違反人民明白的意 願……因此,現在,我們這些在國民議會中代表古老愛爾蘭民族的 民選代表,以愛爾蘭國家的名義,批准建立愛爾蘭共和國……我們 鄭重宣布在愛爾蘭的外國政府是侵犯我們的國家權利,我們永遠不 會容忍,並要求英國駐軍撤離我國……。 ……愛爾蘭的種族,語言,習俗和傳統與英語截然不同。愛爾蘭是 歐洲最古老的國家之一,雖然歷經七個世紀的外國壓迫,她保持了 她的民族完整性……她從未放棄自己的民族權利,並且在英國篡奪 的漫長時期,每一代的愛爾蘭人都頑強地宣稱她們不可剝奪的國家 權利,直到 1916 年她最後一次光榮的訴諸武力……今天的愛爾蘭在 新世界擺脫戰爭之際,更加自信地重申了她的歷史性國家地位,因 為她相信自由和正義是國際法的基本原則,因為她相信各國族之間 的平等合作,以平等權利反對古代暴政的既得特權,因為歐洲的永 久和平不能通過永久的軍事統治來保障帝國的利益,而只能透過自 由人民的自由意志。現有愛爾蘭和英國戰爭狀態永遠不會結束,除 非英國武裝部隊自愛爾蘭撤離。 ăௐ 3 ഇĞ2019/ࡌ؞ཱིğס Įέ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώįௐ 15 62 ϚຑႬܬࡻ઼ 700 кѐֽ۞ᑅ࢝Ăᄮؠࡻ઼ߏځͽ˯׌࣎͛Іੵ˞ᛚ ຑႬᜋિ޺үࠎ˘࣎፾ϲ۞઼छĄଂ 1919 ѐຑႬځγĂܑ֭عᜋ۞γ઼߆ ᜋિ޺፾ϲ઼छ۞ϲಞֽ࠻ĂѨѐĞ1920 ѐğ12 ͡ࡻ઼఼࿅۞ĺຑႬᜋҋ ܜ˞΃פ९Ļಶ௲ᗓ˞ຑႬᜋ۞ன၁Ąϔ୉͹ཌྷ۰၆ԆБ፾ϲ۞ࢋՐڱڼ ९Ļ૟ຑႬᜋ̶౷јΔຑႬڱعᅮՐĄт݈ࢗĺຑႬᜋ߆۞ڼഇͽֽ၆ҋ ᛉົĂЧѣ˘࣎ᓁ༛ĞLordטᜋ׶ݑຑႬᜋĄՏ࣎ຑႬᜋౌѣ׌࣎׌ੰ ͚޺ĂЯࠎΔຑଂϏವՐזצLieutenant of IrelandğĄ఺ี೩ᛉдΔຑႬᜋ ĂҭజݑຑႬᜋ۞ຑႬᜋВ׶ᛨˠăຑႬᜋϔ୉͹ཌྷ۰١඗Ă΁ࣇڼ࿅ҋ ҋؕӈعĞWikipedia, 2019hğĄࡻ઼߆ڱ١඗ࡻ઼ᛉົѣᝋӀࠎຑႬᜋϲ ١඗҂ᇋຑႬᜋВ׶઼۞јϲĂֹ࣐В׶઼ΞјϲĂੵ˞૟ጱ࡭ຑႬᜋ߆ ᙯܼγĂՀົឰࡻ઼ಉεд׎΁തϔг۞͹ጱгҜĄ۞ވᕝᄃࡻ઼ͳ̷ع ˞ĂдຑႬᜋొཌڱޠѐมĂࠎ˞ૻ˧ବᎿᄃેҖ 1921 זࡻ઼д 1919 ѐ Ă˧ڠຑႬᜋ΃ܑࣇຐࢋՀк۞ڍĄ၆ࡻ઼ֽᄲĂт˧ڠϒఢܧధкϒఢᄃ ᗉᑅĞLloyd, 1998: 516ğĄࡻ઼ᄃຑႬᜋ̝ม۞኏ࡎ޺˧ڠࡻ઼Ξͽ޺ᜈ ᛉĂ֭д 1921 ѐ 12 ͡ 6 ཱིᘪࢎ˞ĺࡻຑםѐ 7 ͡ᗕ͞ᘪཌઃጼ 1921 זᜈ ୧ࡗĻĄѨѐĞ1922ğ۞ 1 ͡ຑႬᜋᛉົ఼࿅ĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻĂТຍຑႬᜋ ΃В׶઼Ăࡻ઼઼ົᐌӈд 1922 ѐ۞ 3 ఼͡פֽטଳϡҋϤ֣۞Ӗ͹ϲጳ ९ĻĞIrish Free State ActğĂТѐ 10 ͡ຑႬᜋᛉົڱ࿅˞ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ ͡ ĻĞConstitution of the Irish Free StateğĂ12ڱ఼࿅˞ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ९ĻĞIrish Free State Constitutionڱڱࡻ઼઼ົ఼࿅˞ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ActğĞHudson, 1925: 150ğĄдឍቾᄃഘഔᆅ˭̝ᅫĂĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻдຑ Ⴌᜋிᛉੰͽ 64 ை͚޺Ă57 ைͅ၆Ă3 ைϏԸ఼҃࿅Ą˛ை̝मֹͅ၆୧ Ą઼ޓ၆ԩ̂ࡻֽ˧ڠࡗ۰޺ᜈͽ 參、愛爾蘭自由邦憲法的演進 Ҍ͌д 1914 ѐͽ݈ĂĶຑႬᜋķ఼૱జೡࢗј఺࣎फᑎĂ֭ͷຍஉ඾ ९ĻڱعຑႬᜋٕຑႬᜋВ׶઼Ą1920 ѐ۞ĺຑႬᜋ߆۞ڼഽ୕Ĉҋڼ߆ ᛨિ޺ຑႬᜋ̙ߏ˘࣎തϔгĂ҃ߏ˘࣎Οҁ۞܆౹ౄ˞׌࣎ຑႬᜋĂາ ።Ϋซ඀ 63۞ڱຑႬᜋ׌ొጳ ٚᄮߏ˘࣎ҋϤ۞઼छĂ֭ͷጾѣҋϤͽ̈́ԆፋّĂع୉Ą΁ࢋజࡻ઼߆઼ ఺˵ߏຑႬᜋҋϤ઼֣Щֹٙϡ۞ຍཌྷĞDaly, 2007: 74ğĄ̙࿅Ăĺࡻຑ ୧ࡗĻ̏ԯຑႬᜋफ̶౷ࠎݑొ۞ 26 ੤ĞϺӈຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ğͽ̈́Δొ۞ ΃ĄٙᏜפଂѩజຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ٙײ੤ĞϺӈΔຑႬᜋğĂݑຑႬᜋ۞Ⴭ 6 ҋՙ۞ᝋӀĂҭ၆γ߆ඉ̪дࡻ઼Ⴞ༛̝ڼຑႬᜋҋϤ֣Щཌྷ˯ֳѣҋ۞ Ąĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻᔘఢቑ˞ࡻ઼઼ͳ૟јࠎຑႬᜋҋϤ֣۞઼छ̮ࢵĂ֭˭ ĞᄰෟߏͽВمᄰड़ކϤᓁ༛΃ܑćᛉົ۞јࣶ૟జࢋՐШຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ ᚶٚˠğĂᛉົޠڱੳ˭ă΁۞ᚶٚˠ׶͵̣ڼͳಕ઼ٺمТ۞̳ϔ֗Њ ឰຑႬᜋڱགྷࡻ઼ᓁ༛Բ̖ࣞਕϠड़Ąೱ֏̝Ă1922 ѐ۞ጳืޠڱ఼࿅۞ Ąĺࡻຑڼ྿ 700 ѐ۞ࡻ઼തϔ௚ܜ˞Ă่ߏԛё˯ඕՁڼ၁னѣࢨ۞ҋ ޓ୧ࡗĻଵੵ˞ຑႬᜋјࠎВ׶઼۞ΞਕĂιٙ೩ֻ۞ߏຑႬᜋүࠎ̂ࡻ ᓑ༖ܧᜋ ݑ܆ᅳгҜĂᄃΐो̂ă፫̂Ӏֲă৸Ҙᜋă৸ڼЊ۞ҋొ˘઼ Тඈ৺Ąд઼ᅫ˯ĂຑႬᜋᄃຑႬᜋҋϤ֣఺׌࣎ЩჍҬͼߏϹആֹϡĄ ᅫᓑ༖ॡĂߏϡ઼۞ޢ༊ຑႬᜋд 1923 ѐ 9 ͡జ̯ధΐˢௐ˘Ѩ͵ࠧ̂ጼ ຑႬᜋ۞ЩჍĂ̙҃ߏຑႬᜋҋϤ֣Ą̙࿅ࡻ઼˘ۡ̒ঘຑႬᜋЩჍ۞ֹ ϡຑֹܧϡຑႬᜋֹ҃ٺϡĄּтд઼ᅫ౻̍௡ᖐ̚Ăࡻ઼۞౻̍ొಶ၆ ႬᜋҋϤ֣೩΍ԩᛉĂࡻ઼˘ۡдဘྏ඾ቁܲຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ѩЩჍ۞ֹϡ ĞDaly, 2007: 74-75ğĄ ጳົᛉטĻௐ 83 ୧ఢؠĂຑႬᜋڱॲፂ 1922 ѐ۞ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ཱི Ą1922 ѐ 10 ͡ 25ڱ׶ࡻ઼઼ົυืд 1922 ѐ 12 ͡ 6 ఼ཱི̝݈࿅ώጳ Ăࡻ઼݋ߏдТѐ۞ 12 ͡ 5 ఼ཱི࿅ĺຑႬᜋҋڱຑႬᜋிᛉੰ఼࿅˞ྍጳ ĻĂڱ९ĻĄೱ֏̝ĂຑႬᜋҋϤ఼֣࿅˞˘ొĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳڱڱϤ֣ጳ ,९ĻĞHudsonڱڱࡻ઼઼ົĂϤࡻ઼઼ົ఼࿅ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳזГो ĞscheduleğĂௐ˘࣎ߏܑܢ९̚ѣ׌࣎ڱ150ğĄдࡻ઼఼࿅۞఺࣎ :1925 Б͛Ăௐ˟࣎݋ߏĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻĄೱ֏̝ĂдຑႬᜋ઼ົ఼࿅۞ڱ఺ొጳ ९Ļ۞ڱĻߏдࡻ઼઼ົ̚ລ੨ĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻͽĺڱĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ۞ ѐĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ 1922 ژЩཌྷ఼࿅ĞDelany, 1960: 17-18ğĄ˵Яѩд̶ Ļ̰͛ॡĂυืᄃĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻүాඕ͞ਕ˘᎚БᄻĄڱጳ ९̚ĂАѣᖎಏ۞݈֏ͽ̈́ˬ̈߱ໄࢗĂତ඾ྶѣڱдࡻ઼఼ٙ࿅ྍ ăௐ 3 ഇĞ2019/ࡌ؞ཱིğס Įέ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώįௐ 15 64 ९˘ฟؕڱ2ĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻĄࡻ઼۞ ܑܢĻͽ̈́ڱ1ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ܑܢ ၁߉ຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ٺ९ߏд 1921 ѐ 12 ͡ 6 ཱིдࣖ೶ᘪཌ۞ᙯڱѩځӈᛚ Ϡड़ᑕྍͽ۞ڱ९Ą݈֏۞ௐ˟߱ૻአ˞ѩొጳڱ׶၁߉ĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻ۞ ̶͛̚ࠎĈ̬௜ّ୧ഠĞௐ̰ڱጳ۞ 1 ܑܢĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻϠड़ࠎ݈೩Ąд ׶̳ϔט፟ᙯĞௐ 13-46 ୧ğć౹ڱ୧ğćૄώᝋӀĞௐ 5-10 ୧ğćϲ 1-4 ࣒ϒ९Ğௐ 50 ୧ğć̰ᅦĞௐ 51-59 ୧ğćᓁڱԸைĞௐ 47-48 ୧ğćጳ Ğௐ 64-72 ୧ğͽ̈́ੰڱ༛Ğௐ 60 ୧ğć઼छੑ߆ႾგĞௐ 61-63 ୧ğć ᇶҖఢؠĞௐ 73-83 ୧ğĄ ፧ݓ۞ࡻ઼Ғ૾т˭ĈຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ߏ௡ј̂ࡻڱඊ۰Еᓝ΍఺ొጳ ᅫۤົ۞πඈјࣶĞௐ 1 ୧ğć઼ົᛉࣶ۞ᄰෟт˭Ĉԧఄᚑ۞઼۞ם઼ ̣ڼͳಕ઼ٺمĂԧ֭૟ڱຑႬᜋҋϤ֣۞ጳٺྕمЈ׶ܫϯৌϒ۞ކ ९̏གྷ఼࿅ٕజෛࠎ఼̏ڱĂ΁۞ᚶٚˠͽ̈́ᚶЇ۰Ğௐ 17 ୧ğćЇң͵ ΃ܑϺΞֶވ΃ܑ೩΍Ăͽ઼ͳ۞Щཌྷܑϯ઼ͳТຍĂͳވ࿅ĂυืШͳ ΐҭ३Ğௐ 41 ୧ğćຑႬᜋҋܢ९ڱͳຍԠ̝ϒё఼ۢܲ঻Тຍᝋٕ၆઼ ΃ܑᑕჍࠎຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ᓁވͳĞௐ 51 ୧ğćͳ઼ٺᕩᛳރϤ֣۞Җ߆ᝋ ༛Ă׎Ї׻͞ёᑕᄃΐो̂ᓁ༛˘ᇹĞௐ 60 ୧ğĄ гڱጳ۞઼̚ޓĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻՀ୻຾۞ܑ྿ຑႬᜋд̂ࡻ۞ 2 ܑܢ҃ ᓑ༖Ğௐ 1 ୧ğćܧᅳ׶ݑڼᅳă፫̂Ӏֲᓑ֣ă৸ҘᜋҋڼҜтТΐो̂ҋ ᅳ۞гҜ࿩ТĞௐ 2 ୧ăௐ 3 ୧ğćຑႬᜋ઼ົᛉࣶ۞ᄰෟڼᄃΐो̂ҋ ᑕྍ࢑ፉعĻௐ 17 ୧Ğௐ 4 ୧ğćຑᜋҋϤ֣߆ڱтТĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ЇચĞௐ 7 ୧ăௐ 8 ୧ğĄдຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ᛉົ఼࿅Բࣞྍ֨םࡻ઼࢕ฤ ၆ΔຑႬᜋ̙׍Җֹᝋع͛३̝͟੓˘̰࣎͡ĂຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ᛉົ׶߆ ९ĻᄃΔຑႬᜋ࠹ᙯ̝୧̪͛൒׍ѣԆБ۞ڱعĂ1920 ѐ۞ĺຑႬᜋ߆˧ аΔຑႬᜋ۞Ᏼܔड़˧Ă֭ͷ̙଀ᓝҖᏴᓝĂឰຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ᛉົ۞јࣶ ΔຑႬᜋᛉົ׌ੰд˘఼̰࣎͡࿅ՙᛉ͚޺ᓝҖѩᙷᏴᓝĞௐ 11ܧડĂੵ ഇ̝݈ĂΔຑႬᜋᛉົ׌ੰШ઼ͳੳ˭೩Ϲϒזд˯ࢗ˘࣎͡ڍ୧ğĄт ΔຑႬᜋĂ҃זᝋ˧૟̙Гؼҩ۞عёኛᙸĂ֤ᆃຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ᛉົ׶߆ ९Ļ̚ᄃΔຑႬᜋѣᙯ۞ఢؠĂᑕᚶᜈ׍ѣԆڱعͷ 1920 ѐ۞ĺຑႬᜋ߆ Б۞ड़˧Ăώ͛३ᑕдυࢋॡ࣒ԼăϠड़Ğௐ 12 ୧ğĄ ።Ϋซ඀ 65۞ڱຑႬᜋ׌ొጳ ΞਕĂ఺˘࣎۞׀ࡻ઼༊൒̙ົឰΔຑႬᜋᄃຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ѣЇңЪ ९ĻڱعĺຑႬᜋ߆זצഇࢨ˵Ϊߏणனࡻ઼෍઄۞ϔ͹Ą҃ΔຑႬᜋ۞͡ ௣ͤĄௐ 15ޢࢗ 1972 ѐĶ౫໭ķĞtroublesğ൴Ϡ݈זۡ˘ఢቑĂڼҋ۞ Ξͽع׶ݑຑႬᜋ߆عЇңॡ࣏ĂΔຑႬᜋ߆۞ޢؠ͟ഇם୧ఢؠĂдώ ΔຑႬᜋЇ׻ᝋ۞ٺ࠹ᙯఢؠĂΒ߁ᙯ۞זᓝҖົᛉĂ੅ኢ˘ֱ՟ѣజ೩ ׶̍ຽٽᇆᜩΔຑႬᜋ෶ٺΔຑႬᜋќˢ۞ܲᅪନ߉ćᙯٺᅪନ߉ćᙯܲ ΔຑႬٺΔຑႬᜋ͌ᇴϔ୉۞ܲᅪନ߉ćᙯٺซ΍˾ᙯඁ۞ܲᅪନ߉ćᙯ ᜋ༊гϔһ۞ᝋ˧፟ၹ̈́༊ᝋ۰۞щଵĂщଵΔຑႬᜋᄃຑႬᜋҋϤ֣̝ ᏉᙯܼĂͽ̈́ຑႬᜋҋϤ֣׶ΔຑႬᜋ֨኎˧ณ̝ม۞ᙯܼĄܛม۞ Ļߏͽ˛ை̝मдຑႬᜋᛉົ఼̚࿅ĄॲፂڱĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳٺϤ ༊ٺጳ֭д 1926 ѐјϲ۞ຑႬᜋВ׶ᛨĞFianna Fáilğט͹ጱ࣒ጳăޢ͟ ڱॡٙ߹఼۞็ಏĞϤ੃۰ Frank Gallagher ેඊğ̚۞ኢࢗĂ1922 ѐ۞ጳ ķ۞ۋĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻĂ҃ĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻߏຑႬᜋдĶϲӈͷΞُጼٺࢨצ ୧͛Ăధкڱጳົᛉٙਨᑢ۞ࣧؕጳטຑႬᜋܐ၆໰༊ڍؠĄтט˭਎ރ ਨ९̚՟ѣᄰڱ૲Νࡻ઼۞୧̙͛ಏಏజ࣒ԼĂ҃ͷᔘజࢦᆷĄּтдጳ ՟˯̝ੰڱෟć՟ѣ၆ࡻ઼઼ͳ۞ٚᄮć՟ѣࡻ઼ࠁዸ۞ᓁ༛ćдຑႬᜋ ̳۞઼ޓࡻ̂צć՟ѣٚᄮຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ᄃΔຑ۞̶ᗓć̙ତੰڱѣՀ੼ ϔ֗Њćᄃࡻ઼׎΁തϔг՟ѣВТπඈ۞યᗟĞЯࠎຑႬᜋ̙ߏതϔгĂ ćᛉົטᅮࢋࢫॾᄃࡻ઼തϔ۞ВТπඈğć၆ຑႬᜋ઼ᅫгҜ՟ѣࢨ̙ ,ĞCoffeyۋΡฟٕߏྋ೸̙ᅮࢋͽࡻ઼઼ͳ̝ЩćຑႬᜋ̙ᅮࢋଡˢࡻ઼ጼ 2012: 275-76; Farrell, 1970: 134-40ğĄ ຑႬٺĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻ۞ؠҜٙ޺ϲಞЧளĄ၆ٺࡻ઼ᄃຑႬᜋ̝ม၆ ᜋ҃֏ĂຑႬᜋд 1919 ѐ 1 ͡ 21 ͟јࠎ፾ϲ۞В׶઼Ă༊ॡдຑႬᜋֶ οႬᜋВކڒߦౌٺᏴᓝ҃யϠ۞ࡻ઼઼ົ΃ܑ١඗Νࡻ઼ಶᖚĂ֭ཏჸ ٚᄮ̖ѣٙعࡻ઼߆זצຑႬᜋ઼ົĄ1921 ѐॡب˘׶઼۞јϲĂ௡јௐ ຑႬᜋ઼ົͽ̈́ࡻ઼઼ົԲࣞĂ҃ௐب˟Ꮬ۞ĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻĂѩ୧ࡗజௐ ĻĂᔵ൒ࡻ઼઼ົԲࣞĺຑڱຑႬᜋ઼ົ݋ߏ఼࿅ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳبˬ ĻĂҭ֤ߏࡻ઼̰ొ۞ְଐĂᄃຑႬᜋ൑ᙯĄĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻڱႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ९۞ఢؠ൴Ϡड़˧Ą൒҃Ăࡻ઼۞៍ᕇ݋ڱдຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ЯຑႬᜋᏴᓝ ăௐ 3 ഇĞ2019/ࡌ؞ཱིğס Įέ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώįௐ 15 66 ڠεୀ۞ٺຑᜋ઼ົߏݔ઼۞ౚᏖĂ໚ҋ۞ب˘ߏၟ൒̙ТĄ΁ࣇᄮࠎௐ ͹۞˯ޠڱҖְ၁˯ᄃેڱຑႬᜋᅳ˿൑ٺะົ၆۞ڱ྅ݔใĄ఺჌࿁ થ۞ຑႬᜋ΃ܑĶޫμߏķםથĂ఺ֱםՙؠᄃݔ࢕عᝋĄ1921 ѐॡࡻ઼߆ ᄃ఺ֱ΃ܑٙᘪࢎ۞ع९ٙᏴ΍ֽ۞ຑႬᜋ઼ົᛉࣶĄࡻ઼߆ڱѐ 1920 ֶ ᛉܑ྿ࡻ઼ТຍຑႬᜋҋϤ֣םᛉĞagreementğ̙҃ߏ୧ࡗĄѩםߏ˘࣎ ϲຑႬᜋҋϤ֣࿅඀ޙĂֽેҖعᛉдຑႬᜋనϲ˞ᓜॡ߆םјϲĂѩ۞ ९ĻĂಶࡻ઼ڱҖ߆૷ચĄ༊ 1922 ѐࡻ઼઼ົ఼࿅˞ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣۞̚ ب˟९֭൑ٚᄮௐڱᛉĻϠड़Ąѩם९ֹܳĺࡻຑڱநኢ҃֏Ăѩڱޠ۞ ९ྋ೸˞ݑຑႬᜋ઼ົĂᓝҖᏴᓝᏴ΍າ઼ົĂତ඾ຑႬᜋ؎ࣶڱĂົ઼ ĻĂ֭གྷϤࡻ઼઼ົϠड़Ąࡻ઼઼ົ֭ܲ঻˞ᇆڱਨᑢĺຑᜋҋϤ֣ጳົ ຑႬᜋ઼ົ఼ٙ࿅۞ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳبˬᝋ˧Ąௐ۞ޠڱᜩႬᜋҋϤ֣ ९Ąೱ֏̝ĂຑᜋҋϤ֣ڱܧ९̚۞˘࣎Ķନ߉ķ҃ڱ९Ļ่ߏࡻ઼ڱڱ ९̚۞Ᏼᓝ่ڱĄٙѣдຑᜋҋϤ֣ڱޠ۞઼ޓࡻ̂ٺᖂ่ߏ໚ૄޠڱ۞ ᇹĂࡻ઼઼ົ౵˘ܧߏ˘࣎ϲጳ۞໤౯࿅඀ĂтТΐो̂ă፫̂Ӏֲăݑ Ϡड़۞ᝋ˧ĞDelany, 1957: 3-5; Keane, 2004-2006: 139ğĄޠڱ௣ኬ̟఺ֱ ன઼ޓĻߏ̂ࡻڱKennedy д 1923 ѐ۞͛ౢ̚஽៙ĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ಔͧڱጯ၆͵ࠧ۞੒ᚥķĄ΁ԯ఺ొጳڼ΃።Ϋ̚౵ዂ໴۞˘ࢱĂߏĶ߆ ன၁͹ཌྷ۞៍މѣϔ͹۞ԛёĄ΁ͽڱᇹĂჍధ఺ొጳ˘ڱјтТ઼࡚ጳ ߍ˞ĺࡻͅڱĄ΁ᄮࠎ఺ొጳܚኚϠಅ۞ڱĞobjective realismğࠎ఺ొጳ ຑ୧ࡗĻĂ෹෸˞ΐो̂ᅳг۞гҜĂপҾߏ΁ᄮࠎ၆ࡻ઼઼ͳ۞ᄰෟߏ ΁֭ᄮࠎຑᜋҋޢĞallegianceğĄ౵مĞfidelityğĂ̙֭ߏᕩึٕड़ྕم Ăజෛࠎߏ˘࣎͹ᝋ෪ᇈĞKennedy, 1923: 317-19ğĄڱϤ֣ҋ̎ਨᑢѩጳ ͛Іķ۞˲ܧĻߏ˘࣎ĶڱKeaneĞ2004-2006: 139ğ˵ᄮࠎĺຑᜋҋϤ֣ጳ Ğremarkable documentğĂЯࠎ఺ߏௐ˘Ѩ݈ࡻ઼ҫѣгĞpossessionğΞ ׎΁ࡻ઼ᅳгٺϠड़Ă၆ڱĂᖣϤҋ̎۞ጳ߆ᛉົֹጳڱϲҋ̎۞ጳޙͽ யϠĄڱ֏Ăּтΐो̂ĂଂϏѣтѩጳ҃ ຑႬᜋˠϔĂ҃ߏγд˧ณٙٺ໚ҋܧ֭ڱт݈ࢗຑႬᜋҋϤ֣۞ጳ ᄃĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻ኏ࡎॡĂĺࡻຑ୧ࡗĻ۞ड़ڱĄ༊ጳڱૻҖኬ̟۞˘ొጳ ຑႬᜋҋϤ֣۞хдߏЯࠎ 1922ٺĞMacNeill, 1923: 61ğĄϤڱጳٺ੼˧ ።Ϋซ඀ 67۞ڱຑႬᜋ׌ొጳ ᝋĞдຑႬᜋҋϤ֣Тຍڱ९Ăࡻ઼ܲ঻၆ຑႬᜋ۞ϲڱѐࡻ઼఼ٙ࿅۞ ˭९ڱğĄߊ൒ຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ߏдࡻ઼۞ڱĂࡻ઼Ξͽࠎ׎ϲ˭̝ڶଐ۞ :ᖂĞCoffey, 2012ૄڱјϲ۞Ăࡻ઼࠹၆۞ΞͽၣዚຑႬᜋҋϤ֣хд۞ϲ ၁Җ۞ 15 ѐมĞ1922-37ğ࣒ڱГΐ˯ጳڍDelany, 1960: 18ğĄт ;280-81 ᙱநྋٕᙒТĺຑޝĂኢ۰ᑕྍڱ౵௣ 1937 ѐΩࢎؠາ۞ጳזԼ˞ 27 ѨĂ ͛ІķĄ۞˲ܧጯ၆͵ࠧ۞੒ᚥķٕߏĶڼĻߏĶ߆ڱႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ Ļௐ 50 ୧ఢؠĈĶଂ 1922ڱ఺ᆃкѨ۞࣒ጳߏֶĺຑႬᜋҋϤ֣ጳ ۞ޢķĄ8 ѐഇࢨ̝ڱ࣒Լጳֽڱ၁Җ੓ 8 ѐ̰ĂΞͽ౅࿅˘ਠ۞ϲڱѐጳ ඀ԔγĂυืГ೩Ϲˠϔ̳ϔԸைĄ1929 ѐຑᜋ઼ڱ࣒ጳĂੵ˞˘ਠ۞ϲ ඾ຑႬᜋקҌ 16 ѐĂѩຍܜ೩΍ௐ 16 ཱི࣒ϒ९Ă૟ࣧࢎ۞ 8 ѐഇࢨؼົ ڱѣυࢋĂ઼ົΞͽ˘ۡ౅࿅˘ਠϲڍ࣒ጳΞͽ̙υགྷ࿅̳ϔԸைĂт۞ ГؼΩγ˘࣎ 8 ѐĞAnonymous, 1945: 34ğĄ ੵ˞ຑႬᜋ̰ొ࣒ጳᐛᐛγĂγొ۞ត̼˵೩ֻຑႬᜋ፟ྻഈШВ׶
Recommended publications
  • British Royal Banners 1199–Present
    British Royal Banners 1199 – Present Geoff Parsons & Michael Faul Abstract The presentation begins with the (accepted) date of 1199, the death of King Richard I, the first king known to have used the three gold lions on red. It continues to show how King Edward III added the French Royal Arms, consequent to his claim to the French throne. There is then the change from “France Ancient” to “France Modern” by King Henry IV in 1405, which set the pattern of the arms and the standard for the next 198 years. The story then proceeds to show how, over the ensuing 234 years, there were no fewer than six versions of the standard until the adoption of the present pattern in 1837. The presentation includes pictures of all the designs, noting that, in the early stages, the arms appeared more often as a surcoat than a flag. There is also some anecdotal information regarding the various patterns. Anne (1702–1714) Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Vexillology, Washington, D.C., USA 1–5 August 2011 © 2011 North American Vexillological Association (www.nava.org) 799 British Royal Banners 1199 – Present Figure 1 Introduction The presentation begins with the (accepted) date of 1199, the death of King Richard I, the first king known to have used the three gold lions on red. Although we often refer to these flags as Royal Standards, strictly speaking, they are not standard but heraldic banners which are based on the Coats of Arms of the British Monarchs. Figure 2 William I (1066–1087) The first use of the coats of arms would have been exactly that, worn as surcoats by medieval knights.
    [Show full text]
  • ISBN: 978-88-942588-0-6 1 GATES NO FRONTIERS Images and Memories Beyond the War Photo Exhibition Edited by Osservatorio Di Genere
    ISBN: 978-88-942588-0-6 1 GATES NO FRONTIERS Images and Memories beyond the War Photo exhibition edited by Osservatorio di Genere This communication reflects only the point of view of the author; the European Commission is not responsible for any possible use of it 2 Index Preface p. 5 Hungary 46 The logo 7 Historical Context: Hungary from 1945 47 The Project “Walls and Integration” 8 Budapest – 1945. View from the Royal Palace 49 Event 1 - Gates No Frontiers 10 (kilátás a Királyi Palotától) Spain 14 1945. The colleagues of Radio Free Europe are 51 1967 - Geneve – Spanish migrants at passport 15 packing balloons full of propaganda material control Hungary– Gerberstrasse, 1982. The image of 53 1977– Barcelona – Gay Pride demonstration 18 the Soviet “bloc”. 1987 – Gijón – working class mobilizations 21 Hungary – 1989. Dismantle of the “Iron Curtain” 55 against industrial dismantlement on the Austrian-Hungarian border (a “vasfügg 2014 – Melilla – golf course next to the fence 24 öny” lebontása a magyar–osztrák határon). with the Moroccan border Chronology 57 Asturias 27 Lithuania 58 Context Sheet: Asturias from 1940 to 1980 28 Historical Context: Lithuania 59 Imprenta 1954 - Pareya en vespa 1965 30 Chronology 65 Dìa de la Cultura 1976 32 Ukraine 66 Xura de bandera 1984 34 Historical Context: Ukraine 67 Germany 36 Kyiv - 1957. Some partecipants in the Congress 69 Ludwigsburg – 9 September, 1962. Charles de 37 of the World Federation of Democratic Youth Gaulle during his visit in Germany Central State Cine-Photo-Phono-Archive of Amsterdam – 10 March, 1966. The (difficult) 39 Ukraine “H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Irish Woman: Studies in Cultural Encounter and Exchange, 1714–1960
    Reading the Irish Woman: Studies in Cultural Encounter and Exchange, 1714–1960 Meaney, Reading the Irish Woman.indd 1 15/07/2013 12:33:33 Reappraisals in Irish History Editors Enda Delaney (University of Edinburgh) Maria Luddy (University of Warwick) Reappraisals in Irish History offers new insights into Irish history, society and culture from 1750. Recognising the many methodologies that make up historical research, the series presents innovative and interdisciplinary work that is conceptual and interpretative, and expands and challenges the common understandings of the Irish past. It showcases new and exciting scholarship on subjects such as the history of gender, power, class, the body, landscape, memory and social and cultural change. It also reflects the diversity of Irish historical writing, since it includes titles that are empirically sophisticated together with conceptually driven synoptic studies. 1. Jonathan Jeffrey Wright, The ‘Natural Leaders’ and their World: Politics, Culture and Society in Belfast, c.1801–1832 Meaney, Reading the Irish Woman.indd 2 15/07/2013 12:33:33 Reading the Irish Woman Studies in Cultural Encounter and Exchange, 1714–1960 GerArdiNE MEANEY, MARY O’Dowd AND BerNAdeTTE WHelAN liVerPool UNIVersiTY Press Meaney, Reading the Irish Woman.indd 3 15/07/2013 12:33:33 reading the irish woman First published 2013 by Liverpool University Press 4 Cambridge Street Liverpool L69 7ZU Copyright © 2013 Gerardine Meaney, Mary O’Dowd and Bernadette Whelan The rights of Gerardine Meaney, Mary O’Dowd and Bernadette Whelan to be identified as the authors of this book have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Annual Report 2020
    2020Annual Report Report published by the Supreme Court of Ireland with the support of the Courts Service An tSeirbhís Chúirteanna Courts Service Editors: Sarahrose Murphy, Senior Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Patrick Conboy, Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Case summaries prepared by the following Judicial Assistants: Aislinn McCann Seán Beatty Iseult Browne Senan Crawford Orlaith Cross Katie Cundelan Shane Finn Matthew Hanrahan Cormac Hickey Caoimhe Hunter-Blair Ciara McCarthy Rachael O’Byrne Mary O’Rourke Karl O’Reilly © Supreme Court of Ireland 2020 2020 Annual Report Table of Contents Foreword by the Chief Justice 6 Introduction by the Registrar of the Supreme Court 9 2020 at a glance 11 Part 1 About the Supreme Court of Ireland 15 Branches of Government in Ireland 16 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court 17 Structure of the Courts of Ireland 19 Timeline of key events in the Supreme Court’s history 20 Seat of the Supreme Court 22 The Supreme Court Courtroom 24 Journey of a typical appeal 26 Members of the Supreme Court 30 The Role of the Chief Justice 35 Retirement and Appointments 39 The Constitution of Ireland 41 Depositary for Acts of the Oireachtas 45 Part 2 The Supreme Court in 2020 46 COVID-19 and the response of the Court 47 Remote hearings 47 Practice Direction SC21 48 Application for Leave panels 48 Statement of Case 48 Clarification request 48 Electronic delivery of judgments 49 Sitting in King’s Inns 49 Statistics 50 Applications for Leave to Appeal 50 Categorisation of Applications for Leave to Appeal
    [Show full text]
  • A Letter from Ireland
    A Letter from Ireland Mike Collins lives just outside Cork City, Ireland. He travels around the island of Ireland with his wife, Carina, taking pictures and listening to stories about families, names and places. He and Carina blog about these stories and their travels at: www.YourIrishHeritage.com A Letter from Ireland Irish Surnames, Counties, Culture and Travel Mike Collins Your Irish Heritage First published 2014 by Your Irish Heritage Email: [email protected] Website: www.youririshheritage.com © Mike Collins 2014 All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilised in any form or any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or in any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the author. All quotations have been reproduced with original spelling and punctuation. All errors are the author’s own. ISBN: 978-1499534313 PICTURE CREDITS All Photographs and Illustrative materials are the authors own. DESIGN Cover design by Ian Armstrong, Onevision Media Your Irish Heritage Old Abbey Waterfall, Cork, Ireland DEDICATION This book is dedicated to Carina, Evan and Rosaleen— my own Irish Heritage—and the thousands of readers of Your Irish Heritage who make the journey so wonderfully worthwhile. Contents Preface ...................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................ 4 Section 1: Your Irish Surname .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XIX-2
    Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XIX-2 | 2014 La grande famine en irlande, 1845-1851 The Great Famine in Ireland, 1845-1851 Anne-Catherine de Bouvier et Christophe Gillissen (dir.) Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/194 DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.194 ISSN : 2429-4373 Éditeur CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 septembre 2014 ISSN : 0248-9015 Référence électronique Anne-Catherine de Bouvier et Christophe Gillissen (dir.), Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XIX-2 | 2014, « La grande famine en irlande, 1845-1851 » [En ligne], mis en ligne le 18 novembre 2014, consulté le 09 mai 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/194 ; DOI : https://doi.org/ 10.4000/rfcb.194 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 9 mai 2020. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. 1 SOMMAIRE Foreword H.E. Rory Montgomery Introduction Anne-Catherine de Bouvier et Christophe Gillissen Articles L’échec programmé de la Loi sur les Pauvres Anne-Catherine de Bouvier Les causes de la mortalité pendant la Grande Famine Philippe Brillet The British Relief Association and the Great Famine in Ireland Christine Kinealy ‘Il y a des larmes dans leurs chiffres’: French Famine Relief for Ireland, 1847-84 Grace Neville ‘And this in thriving and prosperous Antrim!’: An
    [Show full text]
  • William Pitt the Younger William Pitt the Younger (28 May 1759 – 23 January 1806) Was a Prominent British Tory Statesman of the Late 18Th and Early 19Th Centuries
    William Pitt the Younger William Pitt the Younger (28 May 1759 – 23 January 1806) was a prominent British Tory statesman of the late 18th and early 19th centuries. He became the youngest Prime Minister in 1783 at the age of 24. He left office in 1801, but was Prime Minister again from 1804 until his death in 1806. He was Chancellor of the Exchequer for most of his time as Prime Minister. He is known as "the Younger" to distinguish him from his father, William Pitt the Elder, who had previously served as Prime Minister. The younger Pitt's prime ministerial tenure, which came during the reign of George III, was dominated by major events in Europe, including the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars. Pitt, although often referred to as a Tory, or "new Tory", called himself an "independent Whig" and was generally opposed to the development of a strict partisan political system. He led Britain in the great wars against France and Napoleon. Pitt was an outstanding administrator who worked for efficiency and reform, bringing in a new generation of outstanding administrators. He raised taxes to pay for the great war against France and cracked down on radicalism. To meet the threat of Irish support for France, he engineered the Acts of Union 1800 and tried (but failed) to get Catholic Emancipation as part of the Union. He created the "new Toryism", which revived the Tory Party and enabled it to stay in power for the next quarter-century. The historian Asa Briggs argues that his personality did not endear itself to the British mind, for Pitt was too solitary, too colourless, and too often exuded superiority.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Isles= ______+ ______• the UK = Great Britain + Northern Ireland
    • The UK= __________ + _________ • Great Britain= _____ + ________ + ________ • The British Isles= ___________ + __________ • The UK = _Great Britain_ + _Northern Ireland_ • Great Britain = _England_ + _Wales_ + _Scotland_ • The British Isles = _the UK_ + _Ireland_ The UK = Great Britain + Northern Ireland • United Kingdom, island country located off the northwestern coast of mainland Europe. The United Kingdom comprises the whole of the island of Great Britain—which contains England,Wales, and Scotland—as well as the northern portion of the island of Ireland. The capital is London , which is among the world’s leading commercial, financial, and cultural centres. Other major cities include: • Birmingham, Liverpool, and Manchester in England, • Belfast and Londonderry in Northern Ireland, • Edinburgh and Glasgow in Scotland, • Swansea and Cardiff in Wales. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/615557/United-Kingdom Great Britain = England + Wales + Scotland • Great Britain , also known as Britain , is an island in the Atlantic Ocean, off the north-western coast of continental Europe. • It is the ninth largest island in the world and the largest island in Europe. • With a population of about 62 million people in mid- 2010, it is the third most populous island in the world, after Java (Indonesia) and Honshū (Japan). • It is surrounded by over 1,000 smaller islands and islets. • Politically, Great Britain refers to the island together with a number of surrounding islands, which constitute the territory of England, Scotland and Wales. • The island is part of the sovereign state of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, constituting most of its territory: most of England, Scotland and Wales are on the island of Great Britain, with their respective capital cities, London, Edinburgh and Cardiff.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime, Deviance, and the Social Discovery of Moral Panic In
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History Volume 1 of 1 Crime, Deviance, and the Social Discovery of Moral Panic in Eighteenth Century London, 1712-1790 by Christopher Thomas Hamerton Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2016 ABSTRACT This thesis utilises the theoretical device of Folk Devils and Moral Panics, instigated by Stanley Cohen and developed by Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yehuda, to explore the discovery of, and social response to, crime and deviance in eighteenth- century London. The thesis argues that London and its media in the eighteenth- century can be identified as the initiating historical site for what might now be termed public order moral panics. The scholarly foundation for this hypothesis is provided by two extensively researched chapters which evaluate and contextualise the historiography of public opinion and media alongside the unique character and power located within the burgeoning metropolis. This foundation is followed by a trio of supportive case studies, which examine and inform on novel historical episodes of social deviance and criminality. These episodes are selected to replicate a sequence of observable folk devils within Cohen’s original typology – youth violence, substance abuse, and predatory sex offending. Which are transposed historically as the Mohocks in 1712, Madam Geneva between 1720-1751, and the London Monster in 1790. Taken together, these three episodes provide historical lineage of moral panic which traverses much of the eighteenth-century, allowing for social change, and points of convergence and divergence, to be observed. Furthermore, these discrete episodes of moral panic are used to reveal the social problems of the eighteenth-century capital that informed the control narratives that followed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Union in Court: Allister and Others' Application for Judicial Review
    Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly Advance Vol. 72 AD1 (2021): 91–114 Commentaries and Notes DOI: 10.53386/nilq.v72iAD1.943 The Union in court: Allister and others’ Application for Judicial Review [2021] NIQB 64 Anurag Deb* Queen’s University Belfast Correspondence email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION n hour before the end of 2020, the Brexit implementation period Aended in the United Kingdom (UK). In much of the European Union (EU), 2021 had already begun. From that time, the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland (the Protocol) to the Withdrawal Agreement between the UK and EU1 has governed much of everyday life in Northern Ireland, but not Great Britain. A mere seven months on, the Protocol has had a tumultuous journey, with London and Brussels exchanging sharp words over its implementation, while nervously watching empty supermarket shelves and rising sectarian tensions in Northern Ireland. On 30 June 2021, the Northern Ireland High Court handed down judgment in Allister and others’ application for judicial review,2 in which the Protocol and its attendant legislation were challenged on multiple grounds. In a dense, comprehensive and keenly awaited judgment, Mr Justice Colton dismissed all five grounds of an extraordinary challenge. The unenviable difficulty of delving into the roots of the famously uncodified UK constitution was compounded by the febrile politics surrounding the Protocol itself. Colton J’s efforts are, therefore, considerable and commendable. In what follows, I examine the facts of the case before turning to the judgment in three main sections: first, its implications for * I am grateful to Dr Conor McCormick and to the anonymous peer reviewer for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this piece.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Political System (Allied- Political Science to History And
    Contemporary political system (Allied- Political science to History and Economics) Paper name: Contemporary political system Paper code:18BPO23C Class: II BA Allied Economics and History Faculty name: V. Senthil Kumar Contact: 9944004231 Unit-2 Political system of the Great Britain The history of the constitution of the United Kingdom concerns the evolution of UK constitutional law from the formation of England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland to the present day. The history of the UK constitution, though officially beginning in 1800, traces back to a time long before the four nations of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland were fully formed. The UK constitution is an accumulation of various statutes, judicial precedents, convention, treaties and other sources which collectively can be referred to as the British Constitution. It is thus more accurate to describe Britain's constitution as an ‘uncodified’ constitution, rather than an ‘unwritten’ one. Important events in the history of England comprises of Civil war, Cromwell and commonwealth and some notable social reforms. The salient features of the British constitution are as follows: Evolutionary, unitary, flexible, Parliamentary executive with sovereignty, mixed constitution, role of conventions and independence of judiciary. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was created on 1 January 1801, by the merger of the Kingdoms of Great Britain and Ireland under the Acts of Union 1800. The principle of ministerial responsibility to the lower House did not develop until the 19th century—the House of Lords was superior to the House of Commons both in theory and in practice. Members of the House of Commons (MPs) were elected in an antiquated electoral system, under which constituencies of vastly different sizes existed.
    [Show full text]
  • Law of Contract July 2010
    LEVEL 6 - UNIT 12 – PUBLIC LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JUNE 2016 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students should have included in their answers to the June 2016 examinations. The suggested answers set out a response that a good (merit/distinction) candidate would have provided. The suggested answers do not for all questions set out all the points which students may have included in their responses to the questions. Students will have received credit, where applicable, for other points not addressed by the suggested answers. Students and tutors should review the suggested answers in conjunction with the question papers and the Chief Examiners’ reports which provide feedback on student performance in the examination. SECTION A Question 1(a) Meaning of parliamentary sovereignty The traditional definition of parliamentary sovereignty is that of AV Dicey: (i) that Parliament can make or unmake any law whatever; (ii) that no other person or body (including the courts) is able to question the validity of an Act of Parliament. The modern concept of Parliamentary sovereignty can be traced back to the 17th century struggle between the Crown and Parliament for supremacy, culminating in the Bill of Rights 1689. The principle was subsequently accepted by the courts. The so-called ‘enrolled Act rule’ illustrates the courts’ reluctance to scrutinise primary legislation. In Edinburgh & Dalkeith Railway v Wauchope (1842) the claimant attempted to challenge the validity of an Act, arguing that proper procedures had not been followed; the House of Lords rejected this argument.
    [Show full text]