Stony Brook University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stony Brook University SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Exploratory Steatite Source Characterization in the Long Island Sound Watershed A Thesis Presented by Mark Stephenson Tweedie to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology (Archaeology) Stony Brook University December 2014 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Mark Stephenson Tweedie We, the thesis committee for the above candidate for the Master of Arts degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this thesis. John J. Shea, PhD. - Advisor Associate Professor, Anthropological Sciences E. Troy Rasbury, PhD. - Second Reader Associate Professor, Geosciences Nina M. Versaggi, PhD. - Outside Reader Associate Professor, Binghamton University This thesis is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Thesis Exploratory Steatite Source Characterization in the Long Island Sound Watershed by Mark Stephenson Tweedie Master of Arts in Anthropology (Archaeology) Stony Brook University 2014 For as long as humans have incorporated stone into their material culture, they have used cooperative strategies (i.e., exchange networks) to mitigate the uneven distribution of available resources on the landscape. The procurement, transport, and selective distribution of lithic materials are thus uniquely human social institutions. One of the few ways to examine the limited evidence for this behavior in the archaeological record is through the geochemical characterization of artifacts and their potential source areas. Steatite cooking vessels recovered on the outer coastal plain of Long Island, New York, are unique in that their acquisition required water-borne transportation from quarries in Connecticut, Massachusetts, or Rhode Island. This research project employs techniques of material source characterization to examine the geographic context for steatite vessel exchange in a discrete study area, the Long Island Sound Watershed. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) was performed with a Bruker Tracer III-V hand-held/portable X-Ray Fluorescence (HHpXRF) unit on steatite artifacts from Long Island archaeological sites, in conjunction with samples collected from prehistoric steatite quarries, historic mines, and geological source areas. From these preliminary data, long-held assumptions about the structure of steatite utilization in Northeastern prehistory can begin to be addressed. Ultimately, this research attempts to establish what geological outcrops were the source(s) for the vessels found on Long Island, and what watershed corridors were the physical conduits for prehistoric trade. EDXRF data suggests that steatite vessels and smoking pipes transported to Eastern Long Island, New York came primarily from two source areas in Rhode Island: the Oaklawn and Ochee Springs quarries. iii I dedicate this research project to my Mother, Donna Stephenson Tweedie. You are truly missed. iv Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………….iii Dedication Page...………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………….iv List of Figures/Tables/Illustrations……………………………………………………………...…………….…………………….vi Acknowledgements….…………………………………………………………..………….…………………….……………….viii Chapter 1 Introduction………..…….………………….…………………………………..……………………………....1 Chapter 2 Background...………………………………..….………………………………………...…………………….4 2.1 Regional Perspectives.…..…………………………………………………………...………………………....9 2.2 Study Area, Context, and Chronology……….………………………………………………………………..18 2.3 Geographic Context of Sampled Quarries and Quarrying Methodology……..………………………………38 Chapter 3 Methods and Materials……………….…..……………………………………………………………………46 3.1 Steatite Source Areas by State…………………………………………………………………………….......60 3.2 Problems with Sampling: Historic Mining and Prehistoric Resource Depletion..............................…………72 3.3 Sampled Long Island Archaeological Sites with Steatite Vessels………………………….............................76 Chapter 4 EDXRF Results..…………………………………………………………………………….…………….…..85 Chapter 5 Analysis..…………………………………………………...…………………………………….…………....86 Chapter 6 Discussion and Conclusion..….…………………………….…………………………………………………92 Figures......….……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….103 Tables.......….……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….140 References….……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….147 Appendices (A-C)…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………170 v List of Figures Figure 1.1 Decorated Steatite Vessel from the Latham Collection (Oysterponds Historical Society), Orient #2 Burial Complex………………………………………………………………...…………………103 Figure 2.1 Eastern North America, archaeological sites and locations mentioned in text....……………………………104 Figure 2.2 Holmes’ reduction sequence of a steatite bowl blank (after Meltzer and Dunnel 1992: Plate LXXVII)........105 Figure 2.3 Inter-regional variation of vessel morphology in New England (after Swigart 1974: 19-20)……………….106 Figure 2.4 Study Area Core, archaeological sites and locations mentioned in text……………………………………..107 Figure 2.5 Steatite Quarry End Picks/Chisels................................. ......................……………………………………...108 Figure 2.6 Middle-Eastern Steatite Vessel Morphology (after Harrell et al. 2008:60).....................................................109 Figure 2.7 Quarry extraction pattern observed at the Bakerville-Nepaug Quarry (after Neshko 1970: 2)….…………..110 Figure 3.1 Schematic model of X-Ray Fluorescence of atoms (after Palmer n.d.)……………………………………...111 Figure 3.2 Synchrotron XRF (S-XRF) spectra generated for Nepaug-Bakerville and Ochee Springs Quarries....……..112 Figure 3.3 Microflourescence Mapping, Nepaug Bakerville……………….................………………………………...113 Figure 3.4 Microflourescence Mapping, Ochee Springs …………………....…………………………………………..114 Figure 3.5 Bruker Tracer III-V with steatite vessel fragment from MPM Farm Site ......………………………………115 Figure 3.6 Uncalibrated EDXRF spectra generated by S1PXRF with the Bruker Tracer III-V unit, Skunk Lane Site....................………………………………………………………………………………...116 Figure 3.7 Prehistoric and historic steatite quarries of Southern New England sampled for EDXRF source characterization, only the Wissahickon Valley, PA source area is not shown (after Sterner 1995)…............117 Figure 3.8 Harwinton Quarry (bottom left), Cotton Hill System (center left), and Beckwith Brook Quarry (top right), shown in geological context with associated bedrock units labeled. (after Generalized Bedrock Geologic Map of Connecticut 1996, Torrington Quadrangle)…………………118 Figure 3.9 Harwinton Quarry (after Martin 1970, Geological Map, Torrington Quadrangle)……………………….....119 Figure 3.10 Steatite Bowl fragments from Beckwith Brook Quarry …………………….................................................120 Figure 3.11 Beckwith Brook Quarry (Stanley 1964), Geological Map, Collinsville Quadrangle………….……………121 Figure 3.12 Serpentinite deposit (shown in dark green) from Staten Island, NY (after USGS-MROSD).....…….……...122 Figure 3.13 Steatite sample collected by the author from Wissahickon Creek Source Area ………………………….…123 Figure 3.14 In-situ, unfinished bowls (e.g., bosses) and craters from the Ochee Springs Quarry ………….……………124 Figure 3.15 Skunk Lane Site excavations ….……………………….................................................................................125 Figure 3.16 Steatite vessel rim (left) and body (right) fragments from the Skunk Lane Site ……………….…………...126 Figure 3.17 Grit and Shell-Tempered Ceramics (top row) and Steatite Vessel Fragment (bottom row) from Locus A at the MPM Farm Site 2006)…………………………………………………………………….....127 Figure 3.18 Flat-Bottomed Steatite Vessel from the Latham Collection (Oysterponds Historical Society), Orient #1/2 Burial Complex ………………………………………………………………………................128 vi List of Figures (continued) Figure 3.19 Rim Fragment of Steatite Vessel from the Latham Collection (Oysterponds Historical Society), Orient #1/2 Burial Complex ………………………………………………………………………................129 Figure 3.20 Steatite Smoking Pipes, Latham Collection, Oysterponds Historical Society ………………………………130 Figure 5.1 Log10 EDXRF biplot for Cr/Ni………………………………………………………………………….......131 Figure 5.2 Log10 EDXRF biplot for As/Cr……………………………………………………………………………..132 Figure 5.3 Log10 EDXRF biplot for Co/As……………………………………...……………………………………...133 Figure 5.4 Log10 EDXRF biplot for Ca/Co...……………………………………………………………………….......134 Figure 5.5 Log10 EDXRF biplot for Cu/Zn...…………………………………………………………………………...135 Figure 5.6 Log10 EDXRF biplot for Cr/Zn……………………………………………………………………………..136 Figure 5.7 Log10 EDXRF biplot for Co/Ni……………………………………………………………………………..137 Figure 6.1 Three prepared quartz turtleback cores from N12/W21, Skunk Lane Site......………………………………138 Figure 6.2 Proposed Model for Steatite Vessel Exchange from two high ranking watersheds (Table 6.1), Connecticut River (Rank 1) and Narragansett Bay (Rank 2)..……………………………………...……….139 Tables Table 2.1 Prehistoric Chronology for Long Island Sound Watershed (after Bernstein 2006, Bernstein et al. 2009, Merwin 2010)…………………………………………….…..140 Table 4.1 Average Net Intensity (ppm) for Steatite Artifacts from Long Island, New York…………………………..141 Table 4.2 Average Net Intensity (ppm) for Steatite Source Areas by State Connecticut………………………………142
Recommended publications
  • Draft Report
    IPSWICH BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING GRANT FY17 DRAFT REPORT 20173509.001A JUNE 19, 2017 This project has been financed partially with State Capital Funds from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (the Department) under a Sustainable Water Management Initiative Grant. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Department, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. TOWN OF DANVERS TOWN OF MIDDLETON TOWN OF HAMILTON LYNNFIELD CENTER WATER DISTRICT TOWN OF TOPSFIELD TOWN OF WENHAM WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report © 2017 Kleinfelder THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report © 2017 Kleinfelder A Report Prepared for: The Town of Danvers, MA In partnership with: Town of Middleton, MA Town of Hamilton, MA Lynnfield Center Water District Town of Topsfield, MA Town of Wenham, MA IPSWICH BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING GRANT FY17 DRAFT REPORT Prepared by: Kirsten N. Ryan, P.G.(NH) Project Manager; Principal Hydrogeologist Reviewed by: Elizabeth C. Frederick Principal Planner KLEINFELDER 215 First Street, Suite 320 Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617.497.7800 Fax: 617.498.4630 June 19, 2017 20173509.001A WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report Page i of v DRAFT June 19, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS to be added WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report Page ii of v DRAFT June 19, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder TABLE OF CONTENTS ____________________________________________________________________________ Section Page 0 EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts
    Geology and Ground-Water Conditions in the Wilmington-Reading Are? Massachusetts By JOHN A. BAKER, HENRY G. HEALY, and O. M. HACKETT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WAT E R-S U P.PLY PAPER 1694 Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Public ff^orks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 IOT mIOR ^Ucrtlon appears after the The CONTENTS Page Abstract-...________.-_---_----_-_________________________-______-_ 1 Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Location and description of the area____-__-i________-___________ 2 Purpose and scope of the report.________________________________ 3 Acknowledgments.__-----_-___-________-___--___-_---____----_ 4 Previous investigations._-_-_--_______________-___-_----____-___ 5 Methods of investigation_______________________________________ 5 General features of the area.________________________________________ 6 Climate_ ________--_-__---_-_________-___-________-_-__-____-_ 6 Topography and drainage______________________________________ 8 Soils and land cover.__________________________________________ 9 Summary of general hydrology and water supply ______________________ 10 Geologic units and the occurrence of ground water_____________________ 13 Bedrock._____________________________________________________ 15 Tin consolidated deposits. -__-_-_____-__--____-_____._______----_ 21 Till-__-_-___-_--------_---______-----_----_-__----------_ 23 Ice-contact deposits..._____________________________________ 26 Outwash.________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 1 OF 8 MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 250176 ARLINGTON, TOWN OF 250177 Middlesex County ASHBY, TOWN OF 250178 ASHLAND, TOWN OF 250179 AYER, TOWN OF 250180 BEDFORD, TOWN OF 255209 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BELMONT, TOWN OF 250182 MELROSE, CITY OF 250206 BILLERICA, TOWN OF 250183 NATICK, TOWN OF 250207 BOXBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250184 NEWTON, CITY OF 250208 BURLINGTON, TOWN OF 250185 NORTH READING, TOWN OF 250209 CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF 250186 PEPPERELL, TOWN OF 250210 CARLISLE, TOWN OF 250187 READING, TOWN OF 250211 CHELMSFORD, TOWN OF 250188 SHERBORN, TOWN OF 250212 CONCORD, TOWN OF 250189 SHIRLEY, TOWN OF 250213 DRACUT, TOWN OF 250190 SOMERVILLE, CITY OF 250214 DUNSTABLE, TOWN OF 250191 STONEHAM, TOWN OF 250215 EVERETT, CITY OF 250192 STOW, TOWN OF 250216 FRAMINGHAM, TOWN OF 250193 SUDBURY, TOWN OF 250217 GROTON, TOWN OF 250194 TEWKSBURY, TOWN OF 250218 HOLLISTON, TOWN OF 250195 TOWNSEND, TOWN OF 250219 HOPKINTON, TOWN OF 250196 TYNGSBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250220 HUDSON, TOWN OF 250197 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 250221 LEXINGTON, TOWN OF 250198 WALTHAM, CITY OF 250222 LINCOLN, TOWN OF 250199 WATERTOWN, TOWN OF 250223 LITTLETON, TOWN OF 250200 WAYLAND, TOWN OF 250224 LOWELL, CITY OF 250201 WESTFORD, TOWN OF 250225 MALDEN, CITY OF 250202 WESTON, TOWN OF 250226 MARLBOROUGH, CITY OF 250203 WILMINGTON, TOWN OF 250227 MAYNARD, TOWN OF 250204 WINCHESTER, TOWN OF 250228 MEDFORD, CITY OF 250205 WOBURN, CITY OF 250229 Map Revised: July 7, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25017CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Introduction to the Upper East Branch Delaware Recreational Access Plan
    I. Introduction to the Upper East Branch Delaware Recreational Access Plan In the wake of Tropical Storm Irene, municipal leaders and other stakeholders can no longer underestimate the value of open space along streams and the role that floodplains play. The recommendations in this plan are consistent with floodplain protection that and advocate for encouraging recreational access in many instances, including when parcels are acquired as part of a flood buyout or when funding opportunities are available to communities after a disaster, such as a flood, in hazard-prone areas. Opportunities, such as flood hazard 1Photo. 1. Margaretville Access Point in 2011 mitigation projects or stream restoration projects, such as those presented by the NY Community Rising initiative (Community Reconstruction Zone), and the Local Flood Analysis (LFA give communities in the upper East Branch Delaware watershed an opportunity to not only plan and prepare better, but also opportunities to enhance recreation and tourism – the foundation of the local economy. These funding opportunities involve aspects of community planning and visioning aimed at reducing flood risk and community 2Photo 2. The same access point in September 2011 resiliency, but also support economic development. With the added support of the local leaders, the programs currently underway will provide for future opportunities to develop economically sustainable regions. The recreational opportunities coupled with resilient Main Street development in the Hub areas will enhance the local tourism economy in the future. Critical, But Often Over-Looked Types of Access In addition to traditional public access areas along waterbodies, such as for fishing and boat launches, two other forms of access, were often identified throughout this project – the need for information on and access to swimming holes and wildlife viewing/watching areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 81, No
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society Journals and Campus Publications 2020 Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 81, No. 1-2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society Follow this and additional works at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/bmas Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Archaeological Society This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. THE BULLETIN of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society Volume 81, Number 1 – 2 Spring–Fall 2020 PUBLISHED BY THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Bulletin of the Robbins Museum of Archaeology Massachusetts Archaeological Society www.masarchaeology.org Volume 81, Number 1 – 2 Phone: (508) 947 9005 October 2020 E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Officers Position Term Expires Editor’s Notes Suanna Selby Crowley President November 2020 Ryan Wheeler ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Victor Mastone Vice President November 2020 Rememberance: Frederica Rockefeller Dimmick (1934 - 2019) Grace Bello Clerk November 2020 Tonya Baroody Largy, Ian W. Brown, John Rempelakis, William A. Griswold, William P. Burke, and Philip Graham ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Low Flow Inventory
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by State Library of Massachusetts Electronic Repository Low Flow Inventory Summary In 2002, recognizing the need for deeper examination of streamflow alteration and depletion in Massachusetts, Riverways program staff embarked upon what was called the “Low Flow Inventory”. Staff made contact with people around the state regarding observed and/or measured flow alterations in streams large and small. The resulting Low Flow Inventory brought together existing information into one place to enable individuals, communities, and state agencies to access information and observations about streams with unnatural flow problems and to summarize the extent of streamflow alteration and depletion on a statewide basis. Riverways’ goal was to publicize and educate the public about the extent of the flow alteration and to empower local communities to prevent and restore more natural streamflow patterns and volumes in their rivers. For many years this information was accessible as a series of linked pages on our website. Over the years, it was less frequently updated, as our staff were focused on stream gaging through our resulting River Instream Flow Stewards (RIFLS) program. Through RIFLS, we work with local organizations to monitor and address specific cases of flow alteration. With our partners and volunteer gage readers, we have been able to more fully document flow stress in some of the streams identified in the Low Flow Inventory (see www.rifls.org). In recognition that many of the Low Flow Inventory pages were becoming out of date, RIFLS staff moved all of the information from those pages into this single document, accessible on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Mishoonash in Southern New England: Construction and Use of Dugout Canoes in a Multicultural Context
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses Dissertations and Theses November 2014 Mishoonash in Southern New England: Construction and Use of Dugout Canoes in a Multicultural Context Jacob M. Orcutt University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2 Part of the Anthropology Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Orcutt, Jacob M., "Mishoonash in Southern New England: Construction and Use of Dugout Canoes in a Multicultural Context" (2014). Masters Theses. 106. https://doi.org/10.7275/5652591 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2/106 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MISHOONASH IN SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND: CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF DUGOUT CANOES IN A MULTICULTURAL CONTEXT A Thesis Presented by JACOB MARK ORCUTT Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS September 2014 History © Copyright by Jacob Mark Orcutt 2014 All Rights Reserved MISHOONASH IN SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND: CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF DUGOUT CANOES IN A MULTICULTURAL CONTEXT A Thesis Presented by JACOB MARK ORCUTT Approved as to style and content
    [Show full text]
  • Revitalizing the Esopus/Delaware Region of the Central Catskills
    Revitalizing the Esopus/Delaware Region of the Central Catskills Towns of Andes, Middletown, and Roxbury Villages of Margaretville and Fleischmanns (Delaware County) Towns of Olive and Shandaken (Ulster County) June 2013 This document was prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Table of Contents SECTION 1 ‐ Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2 ‐ Revitalization Area Boundary .................................................................................................................. 5 SECTION 3 ‐ Completed and Ongoing Plans, Reports, and Studies ..................................................................... 6 SECTION 4 ‐ Assets and Constraints for Economic Revitalization ...................................................................... 9 SECTION 5 ‐ Area Profile and Inventory ...................................................................................................................... 14 5.1 Environmental Resources ........................................................................................................... 14 5.2 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................... 24 5.3 Waterfronts and Waterfront Access .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Spirit Leveling in New York
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED*STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 514= RESULTS OF SPIRIT LEVELING IN NEW YORK 1906 TO 1911, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER WASPIINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation............................ .............................. 5 Previous publication.................................................. 5 Corrections ............................................................ 5 Personnel............................................................. 7 Classification.......................................................... 7 Bench marks........................................................ 7 Datum............................................................... 8 Topographic maps...................................................... 8 Primary leveling........................................................... 12 Dannemora, Loon Lake, Lyou Mountain, and Santa Clara quadrangles (Clinton and Franklin counties)........................................ 12 Massena and Potsdam quadrangles (St. Lawrence County)................ 17 Antwerp, Canton, Hammond, and Ogdensburg quadrangles (Jefferson and St. Lawrence counties).............................................. 18 Big Moose, Carthage, Lowville, McKeever, Number Four, and Port Leyden quadrangles (Herkimer, Lewis, and Oneida counties)................. 23 Cooperstown, Hartwick, and New Berlin quadrangles (Chenango, Madison,
    [Show full text]
  • MERRIMACK RIVER a Com Prehensive W Atershed Assessm Ent Report 2001
    Powow River, Amesbury, MA MWT Executive Office of Environmental Affairs MERRIMACK RIVER A Com prehensive W atershed Assessm ent Report 2001 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 251 Causeway Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114-2119 JANE SW IFT GOVERNOR Tel. (617) 626-1000 BOB DURAND Fax (617) 626-1181 SECRETARY June 2002 http://www.m ass.gov/envir Dear Friends of the Merrimack River Watershed: I am pleased to present the Year 3 Assessment Report for the Merrimack River Watershed. This report outlines the main environmental issues that face the watershed and provides the most current status of the Merrimack River. This report will help formulate the 5-year watershed action plan that will guide state and local environmental actions within the Merrimack River Watershed. The plan will implement the goals of the Massachusetts Watershed Initiative including: improving water quality; restoring natural flows to rivers; protecting and restoring biodiversity and habitats; improving public access and balanced resource use; improving local capacity; and promoting a shared responsibility for watershed protection and management. The EOEA Merrimack River Watershed Team Leader has developed this Assessment Report after extensive research and input was provided from state and federal agencies, Regional Planning Agencies, watershed groups and organizations, and team members. The Watershed Initiative is unique because it focuses on the problems and challenges that are identified with stakeholders and local community partners in each watershed, rather than deciding these priorities solely at the state level. The priority issues identified in the Report include: Water Quality ‹ Water Quantity and Supply ‹ Open Space ‹ Habitat I commend all of those involved with the Merrimack River Assessment effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County, Massachusetts
    ESSEX COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS Essex County (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER AMESBURY, CITY OF 250075 ANDOVER, TOWN OF 250076 BEVERLY, CITY OF 250077 BOXFORD, TOWN OF 250078 DANVERS, TOWN OF 250079 ESSEX. TOWN OF 250080 GEORGETOWN, TOWN OF 250081 GLOUCESTER, CITY OF 250082 GROVELAND, TOWN OF 250083 HAMILTON, TOWN OF 250084 HAVERHILL, CITY OF 250085 IPSWICH, TOWN OF 250086 LAWRENCE, CITY OF 250087 LYNN, CITY OF 250088 LYNNFILED, TOWN OF 250089 MANCHESTER BY THE SEA, TOWN OF 250090 MARBLEHEAD, TOWN OF 250091 MERRIMAC, TOWN OF 250092 METHUEN, CITY OF 250093 MIDDLETON, TOWN OF 250094 NAHANT, TOWN OF 250095 NEWBURY, TOWN OF 250096 NEWBURYPORT, CITY OF 250097 NORTH ANDOVER, TOWN OF 250098 PEABODY, CITY OF 250099 ROCKPORT, TOWN OF 250100 ROWLEY, TOWN OF 250101 SALEM, CITY OF 250102 SALISBURY, TOWN OF 250103 SAUGUS, TOWN OF 250104 SWAMPSCOTT, TOWN OF 250105 TOPSFIELD, TOWN OF 250106 WENHAM, TOWN OF 250107 WEST NEWBURY, TOWN OF 250108 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25009CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New NewZone Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B XX C XX Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 74, No. 2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Journals and Campus Publications Society Fall 2013 Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 74, No. 2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/bmas Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Archaeological Society This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. BULLETIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 74 (2) FALL 2013 Editor’s Note . 34 Perry’s Shell Heap, North Truro, Massachusetts: New Insights from Old Archaeological Sites Lucianne Lavin. 35 Unpublished Papers on Cape Ann Prehistory Mary Ellen Lepionka . 45 Titicut Mullers William B. Taylor . 93 The Copper Projectile Points of North Plymouth Bernard Otto. 98 Contributors . 100 THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, Inc. P. O. Box 700, Middleborough, Massachusetts 02346-0700 THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, Inc. Robbins Museum of Archaeology Web Site address: www.massarchaeology.org phone: (508) 947-9005 email: [email protected] Officers: Philip Graham, 302 Summer St., Apt. #2, Plantsville, CT 06479 President Fred Robinson, 6 Christopher Drive, Greenville, RI 02828 Vice President Susan Jacobucci, 4 Columbian St. Unit 9, Weymouth MA 02190 Clerk Dan Lorraine, 63 Cranberry Terrace, Cranston, RI 02828 Treasurer David De Mello, P.O. Box 262, Mattapoisett, MA 02739 Museum Coordinator Curtiss Hoffman, 58 Hilldale Road, Ashland, MA 01721 Bulletin Editor Jane Lopes, P.O. Box 1273, Middleborough, MA 02346 Corresponding Secretary Frederica Dimmick, P.O. Box 33, Cataumet MA 02534 Past President Trustees: Term Expires Joseph Bagley, 195 Boston St., Dorchester MA 02125 October 2015 Edwin C.
    [Show full text]