DOCSLIB.ORG

Governing the Pandemic the Politics of Navigating a Mega-Crisis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governing the Pandemic the Politics of Navigating a Mega-Crisis Governing the Pandemic The Politics of Navigating a Mega-Crisis Arjen Boin · Allan McConnell · Paul ’t Hart Governing the Pandemic Arjen Boin · Allan McConnell · Paul ‘t Hart Governing the Pandemic The Politics of Navigating a Mega-Crisis Arjen Boin Allan McConnell Department of Political Science Department of Government and Leiden University International Relations Leiden, The Netherlands University of Sydney Darlington, NSW, Australia Paul ‘t Hart School of Governance Utrecht University Driebergen-Rijsenburg, Utrecht The Netherlands ISBN 978-3-030-72679-9 ISBN 978-3-030-72680-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72680-5 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa- tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover illustration: © Melisa Hasan This Palgrave Pivot imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Preface For long-time students of crisis management, COVID-19 is ‘the big one’—the scary Future Crisis so often announced and discussed in the literature: truly global, arriving slowly and lasting for a very long time, with devastating impacts. COVID-19 was the ultimate stress test for plans and preparations, for political and administrative leadership, for societal and institutional resilience. In this book, we wield the tools of crisis studies to understand and explain the dynamics of governmental and societal responses during the first twelve months of this crisis. This is not a detailed case study with timelines and statistics. Our focus is on how governments, particularly those of the advanced economies (that we are most familiar with) have responded to the pandemic, to the complex, transboundary multi-crises it has generated, and the ways publics reacted to the various responses. To write a book about COVID-19 while it is still unfolding is an inherently premature endeavour. The pandemic is still with us. The long shadow it will cast on our societies is only beginning to form. Much about what has happened behind the scenes of political decision-making and public sector performance remains unknown. It is therefore inevitable that some of our findings and interpretations in this book will need to be nuanced or revised as new information emerges. Yet, we think it is important to take a good look—‘from the balcony’— at the governance of this crisis while it is unfolding. Governments and scholars cannot afford to begin the work of reflecting and learning until v vi PREFACE this crisis is truly ‘over’, which may be years from now. Future crises are in the making. We need to get ready. We need to learn what we can, as soon as we can. This book is intended to provide fuel for such a discussion. We offer a synthesis of what we believe to be the four main challenges that all governments face in a crisis of this magnitude: they must make sense of a highly uncertain and dynamic threat; get things done in the face of collective action problems; craft credible narratives about deeply unsettling events; and work towards closure of a crisis that has the poten- tial of destabilizing our societies and their political systems. In the final chapter, we offer some preliminary directions for the deep institutional learning required to make our communities and our governance systems more resilient when the next ‘big one’ comes along. We have made liberal use of the quick-response analyses published by social science colleagues around the world. Together, they covered most all dimensions of the responses of governments, political systems and societies. These scholars have provided a strong evidence base, while addressing a swathe of crisis management and public governance themes. We thankfully build on this body of work. We are particularly thankful to our research assistants, Marte Luesink and Friso Welten, who have done excellent work (ranging from desk research to the final commas in the bibliography). Leiden, The Netherlands Arjen Boin Sydney, Australia Allan McConnell Utrecht, The Netherlands Paul ‘t Hart January 2021 Contents 1 The Year of the Unthinkable 1 Annus Horribilis 2 A Crisis Perspective on Pandemic Governance 4 The Unique Characteristics of the COVID-19 Crisis 6 How Did It Go? First Impressions 11 A Preview of the Book 13 Bibliography 14 2 What’s Going On? 19 A Sense-Making Nightmare 20 Detecting COVID-19: Common Challenges 22 The Role of Experts 27 Navigating Uncertainty: Science-Policy Interface at Knife’s Edge 33 The Precarious Politics of Sense-Making 36 Bibliography 37 3 Getting Things Done 43 When the Rule Book No Longer Works 43 Governance Challenges 46 First Responses 48 Governance Capacity and Legitimacy 52 The Politics of Crisis Governance 58 Bibliography 60 vii viii CONTENTS 4 Crafting Crisis Narratives 65 Constructing the Meaning of the COVID-19 Crisis 66 The Rise and Fall of Crisis Narratives 67 The Power of Words 70 Framing Contests 71 Making Meaning of COVID-19 76 A Long Rollercoaster Ride 79 Bibliography 80 5 Towards Closure 87 The Need for Closure 88 The Politics of Accountability 89 The Politics of Learning 95 COVID’s Long Shadow and the Politics of Memory 100 Bibliography 101 6 Pathways to Resilience 107 Pivoting Forward 107 Overcoming Organized Blindness 108 Vigilant Decision-Making 110 Managing Fragmentation 112 Credible Crisis Narratives 114 Managing Collective Stress 115 What Matters Now 116 Bibliography 118 Index 121 List of Tables Table 2.1 Warning signals of the impending pandemic 23 Table 2.2 Periods between first infection and first measure in four European countries 23 Table 4.1 Meaning making in disruptive times: a roadmap 72 ix CHAPTER 1 The Year of the Unthinkable Abstract COVID-19 brought the ‘unthinkable’ to our doorstep. The pandemic caused a series of global, and interconnected, health, economic, social, institutional and political crises that are unprecedented in living memory. Political leaders struggled to contain the virus and persuade anxious, weary citizens to behave this or that way in order to overcome a giant collective action problem. This chapter is a primer for the detailed examination of political and policy responses to this impossible challenge. It describes pivotal governance challenges and the constraints operating on the crisis response. Keywords Transboundary crises · Pandemic · COVID-19 · Crisis politics · Crisis management Nobody wanted 2020 to be this way—Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. (Lum, 2020) Pandemics and plagues have a way of shifting the course of history, and not always in a manner immediately evident to the survivors. The COVID pandemic will be remembered as such a moment in history, a seminal event whose significance will unfold only in the wake of the crisis.—Anthropologist Wave Davis (2020) © The Author(s) 2021 1 A. Boin et al., Governing the Pandemic, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72680-5_1 2 A. BOIN ET AL. Annus Horribilis The year 2020 will be remembered for the global pandemic—a ‘sem- inal event’ (Davis, 2020)—that dwarfed all other global crises in living memory. By the year’s end, COVID-19 had directly caused the deaths of nearly two million people, jeopardizing the health, well-being and livelihoods of hundreds of millions more.1 It was also an unwanted event, as Trudeau said (see opening quote). Pandemic control measures have pushed economies around the world abruptly into recession while emptying government coffers at astonishing rates. Global debt incurred as a result of COVID-19 has been estimated at $10 trillion in 2020, rising up to $30 trillion by 2023 (Assi et al., 2020). Statistics alone cannot capture the human toll of the crisis. Families were separated from loved ones who died alone. One survivor, who had been hospitalized in the UK for several weeks, said that “I must have seen at least eight people die…… And the fear in people’s eyes is shocking. …. It’s like a nightmare with your eyes open” (Murray, 2020). A physician in New York described how his hospital was “… just getting destroyed. It’s very, very gruesome…. I have one face shield that I have to keep rewashing after seeing every patient…It’s pretty common to see [staff] crying in the hallway… The morale among ER people is extremely low.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5 / the Consequences of Legitimacy
    5 / THE CONSEQUENCES OF LEGITIMACY Legitimacy is a great social good. Sociological and psychological ac- counts stress its importance to human happiness because most indi- viduals prefer to relate to the powerful in moral rather than in self- interested terms. 1 Citizens strive to engage the state as moral agents, and a state that reciprocates will see its standing enhanced. Likewise, most rulers prefer to be esteemed rather than feared by their citizens: it is inherently desirable and it minimizes the time they spend worrying about their positions. 2 Prussian king Frederick the Great (r. 1740–86) fa- mously lamented to a courtier near the end of his life that he was “tired of ruling slaves.” 3 A legitimate state is less dominating over its citizens because the le- gitimate use of power minimizes the negative consequences of power.4 Whatever else legitimate states do for their citizens, one of the great- est public services they deliver is rightful rule itself. Political science is unique in having entire branch of philosophy attached to it for this reason: achieving rightful rule is a momentous social feat. By impli- cation, low-legitimacy states are failing to deliver an important public service, namely allowing citizens to esteem the rulers that claim their obedience. However, legitimacy’s importance does not end with its inherent value. If that were the case, its central place in the history of politi- cal thought would be inexplicable. Rather, legitimacy has instrumental benefi ts that suffuse many aspects of political life. In the last chapter, we saw how Uganda was transformed after 1986 with the coming to power of the National Resistance Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • So Many People Are Perplexed with the Covid-19 Lockdowns, Mask Requirements, Social Distancing, Loss of Jobs, Homes, and Their Very Sanity
    So many people are perplexed with the Covid-19 lockdowns, mask requirements, social distancing, loss of jobs, homes, and their very sanity. What lies behind all of this? There have been so many conflicting reports that one has to ask the question, Is there even a pandemic at all? Was there ever one? Let’s have a look. ======================== Strange advance hints (predictive programming) – A 1993 Simpsons episode called “Marge in Chains” actually accurately predicted the coronavirus outbreak. One scene depicted a boardroom meeting between government officials and major media moguls. The chairman opened with these words: “I’d like to call to order this secret conclave of America’s media empires. We are here to come up with the next phony baloney crisis to put Americans back where they belong…” Suddenly a delegate from NBC chimed in: “Well I think…” Then the chairman interrupted him, saying: “NBC, you are here to listen and not speak!” He then said: “I think we should go with a good old fashioned health scare.” Everyone then nodded in approval. Next, a female delegate remarked: “A new disease–no one’s immune–it’s like The Summer of the Shark, except instead of the shark, it’s an epidemic.” – Another Simpsons episode called “A Totally Fun Thing that Bart will Never Do Again,” first aired on April 29, 2012, featured an emergency broadcast announcing the outbreak of the deadly “Pandora Virus,” and how it was “spreading rapidly.” The announcer then said: “This unprecedented threat requires a world-wide quarantine. All ships must remain at sea until further notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    ISSN: 2051-0861 Publication details, including guidelines for submissions: https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/nmes From Dictatorship to “Democracy”: Neoliberal Continuity and Its Crisis in Tunisia Author(s): Mehmet Erman Erol To cite this article: Erol, Mehmet Erman (2020) ―From Dictatorship to ―Democracy‖: Neoliberal Continuity and Its Crisis in Tunisia‖, New Middle Eastern Studies 10 (2), pp. 147- 163. Online Publication Date: 30 December 2020 Disclaimer and Copyright The NMES editors make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information contained in the journal. However, the Editors and the University of Leicester make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability for any purpose of the content and disclaim all such representations and warranties whether express or implied to the maximum extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and not the views of the Editors or the University of Leicester. Copyright New Middle Eastern Studies, 2020. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from New Middle Eastern Studies, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed, in writing. Terms and Conditions This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Outbreaks in Residential Aged Care Facilities
    COVID-19 and other viral respiratory illness outbreaks in Residential Aged Care Facilities Toolkit to support planning, preparedness, and response We acknowledge and respect Tasmanian Aboriginal people as the traditional owners and ongoing custodians of the land on which we work and live and pay respect to Elders past and present. For around 40 000 years, Aboriginal people have lived on lutruwita/Tasmania, within strong and resilient communities. We acknowledge that as we work to strengthen resilience against respiratory illness across Tasmania. Version 7.1 20 August 2021 Respiratory Illness Outbreaks in Residential Aged Care – Toolkit – Version 7.1 Contents Abbreviations 1 Contacts 1 Introduction 1 Scope and purpose of this document 1 Background 1 Preparedness 4 Prevention 6 Implement hygiene measures 6 Restrict entry to your facility 6 Identification of respiratory illness in an RACF 7 Assessment of staff with fever or respiratory illness 9 Case and Outbreak Management 10 Information sharing 10 COVID-19 10 Other Respiratory illnesses 10 Roles and responsibilities in an outbreak of COVID-19 or other respiratory illness 12 The Outbreak Management Coordination Team 13 Key actions for the RACF in a COVID-19 outbreak 14 Models of care, including place of care 14 Key Resources 16 Appendix 1: Summary of testing process for COVID-19 and other respiratory illnesses in RACF 17 Appendix 2: COVID-19 Outbreak management Plan 18 Appendix 3: PPE Indications for use and purchasing guidance 20 Personal protective equipment for COVID-19 20 Estimating the quantity of PPE required 21 PPE purchasing guidance for COVID-19 22 Appendix 4: Personal protective equipment for contact and droplet precautions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Legitimation Formula - 1991-2000
    THE RUSSIAN LEGITIMATION FORMULA - 1991-2000 Carolina Vendil The Government Department LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Thesis submitted for PhD degree Supervisor: Professor Dominic Lieven Advisor: Professor Rodney Barker - 1 - UMI Number: U174000 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U174000 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Ti-f£$£ IP ^6^771 Abstract The Russian legitimation formula contains the arguments the Russian leadership advanced to promote its state-building project between 1991 and 2000. The period of investigation coincides with Yeltsin’s presidency. The focus is on how the legitimation rhetoric was adjusted both to changing circumstances over time and to three main audiences: the Russian domestic population, the Russian domestic elites and the international community. In order to analyse the contents of the legitimation formula a framework was developed which divided the different arguments used by the Russian leadership into six main categories (democratic, national, charismatic, eudaemonic, external and negative arguments). The material selected for analysis had to relate to basic features of statehood.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ETHICO-EPISTEMIC PERSPECTIVE on COVID-19 Jude I. Onebunne* Abstract the Chequered History of Humanity Is Reckoned with Diseas
    AN ETHICO-EPISTEMIC PERSPECTIVE ON COVID-19 Jude I. Onebunne* Abstract The chequered history of humanity is reckoned with diseases and has recorded outbreaks of dangerous and contagious diseases often referred to as plagues otherwise pandemics. These disease outbreaks ravage humanity interfering greatly in the course of history and at times, signaling the end of an entire civilization in other to reintroduce a complete new world order. At the dawn of Anno Domino 2020, amidst great expectations of pomp and pageantries of a promising new year, we woke up to the confusing news of COVID-19, the brouhaha of the novel Coronavirus disease. Like a joke amidst inherent confusion on its nature, structure and curative status, COVID-19 started spreading geometrically and like a wild fire with corresponding death tolls. This paper tries to critically view and review the whole episode surrounding COVID-19 Pandemic while at the same time appreciates the role of philosophy in the proper and effective handling of COVID- 19 that has come to stay like other pestilences of the past. Keywords: Philosophy, Ethics, Epistemic, COVID-19, Epidemic, Pandemic Introduction Humanity has over the time experienced deadly and brutal outbreak of virulent diseases. They were simply vicious and vile killers in human history. Epidemics, endemics, plagues and pandemics are all part and parcel of human existence that has to do with ill state or poor health of man. Most often, what may be regarded as worrisome as epidemic turns out to be mere sickness in other parts of the world like the dreaded Malaria and scary typhoid fever.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing a System from Within: Applying the Theory
    CHANGING A SYSTEM FROM WITHIN: APPLYING THE THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION FOR FUNDAMENTAL POLICY CHANGES IN KUWAIT A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Nasser Almujaibel May 10, 2018 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Nancy Morris, Advisory Chair, MSP / Media and Communication Dr. Brian Creech, Journalism. Media & Communication Dr. Wazhmah Osman, MSP/ Media & Communication Dr. Sean L. Yom, External Member, Political Science ABSTRACT Political legitimacy is a fundamental problem in the modern state. According to Habermas (1973), current legitimation methods are losing the sufficiency needed to support political systems and decisions. In response, Habermas (1987) developed the theory of communicative action as a new method for establishing political legitimacy. The current study applies the communicative action theory to Kuwait’s current political transformation. This study addresses the nature of the foundation of Kuwait, the regional situation, the internal political context, and the current economic challenges. The specific political transformation examined in this study is a national development project known as Vision of 2035 supported by the Amir as the head of the state. The project aims to develop a third of Kuwait’s land and five islands as special economic zones (SEZ). The project requires new legislation that would fundamentally change the political and economic identity of the country. The study applies the communicative action theory in order to achieve a mutual understanding between different groups in Kuwait regarding the project’s features and the legislation required to achieve them. ii DEDICATION ﻟﻠﺤﺎﻟﻤﯿﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ اﻟﻨﻮم ... اﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﯿﻦ ﺑﻌﺪه iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my parents, my wife Aminah, and my children Lulwa, Bader, and Zaina: Your smiles made this journey easier every day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arab Uprisings As Crises of Legitimacy
    The Arab Uprisings as Crises of Legitimacy Success and Failure of Strategies of Political Rule in Jordan and Algeria Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen vorgelegt von Maria Josua, M.A. aus Schorndorf Tübingen 2014 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 05.12.2014 Dekan: Prof. Dr. rer. soc. Josef Schmid 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Oliver Schlumberger 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Marie Duboc TABLE OF CONTENT List of Tables and Figures v List of Abbreviations vi A Note on the Use of Non-English Sources vii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. The Puzzle 1 1.2. Research Design 5 1.3. Outline of This Study 6 2. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 7 2.1. Strategies of Political Rule in Authoritarian Regimes 7 2.1.1. Concepts of Legitimacy – Including a Twist towards Autocracies 8 2.1.2. Definition and Elements of Legitimacy 13 2.1.3. Crises of Legitimacy 16 2.1.4. The Relationship between Legitimacy and Stability 18 2.1.5. Co-optation: Legitimation with Benefits 21 2.1.6. The Role of Repression 25 2.2. Strategies of Political Rule in the Arab World 26 2.2.1. Literature on Legitimation and Repression in the Arab World 27 2.2.2. Crises of Former Sources of Legitimacy in the Arab World 31 2.2.2.1. Traditional Legitimacy 34 2.2.2.2. Material Legitimacy 36 2.2.2.3. Ideological Legitimacy 37 2.2.2.4. Religious Legitimacy 39 2.3. The Arab Uprisings as a Crisis of Legitimacy 40 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus Community Member Survey Appendix
    Billings Community Coronavirus Assessment CORONAVIRUS COMMUNITY MEMBER SURVEY APPENDIX December 2020 AmeriCorps VISTAs: Blake Matthew & Amber Nichols Page 1 of 173 V12/14/202020 INDEX Q1. How has the coronavirus pandemic impacted you and/or your family since April 1, 2020? Check all that apply. 3 Q2. To what degree were/are you and or your family impacted by the following? 9 Q3. If you lost income, or lost your job, what is/was your job title or job type? 12 Q5. To what degree do you have a support system in each of the following areas? 19 Q7. How aware are you of the following resources available through the State of Montana? 20 Q8. Please provide the degree to which you and your family have CURRENT access to the following resources. 21 Q9. Did you, or anyone in your household, apply for public assistance BEFORE April 1, 2020? 22 Q10. Did you, or anyone in your household, apply for public assistance AFTER April 1, 2020? 23 Q13. Did your total household members, or household makeup, change AFTER April 1, 2020? 24 Q14. Please share the race / ethnicity with which you and your household members identify. Please select the number of household members in each race(s) line AND select yes or no within the Hispanic or Latino column. 30 Q19. What is your household's greatest need relative to the coronavirus pandemic? 31 Q20. What do you believe is the Billings community's greatest need related to the coronavirus pandemic? 79 Q21. Is there anything else you would like to say regarding coronavirus impact(s) or how the Billings community should respond? 134 Page 2 of 173 V12/14/202020 CORONAVIRUS COMMUNITY MEMBER SURVEY Community Comments from Survey Questions This document contains comments from the Coronavirus Community Member Survey of Fall 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Viruses and Malware Advances in Information Security
    Computer Viruses and Malware Advances in Information Security Sushil Jajodia Consulting Editor Center for Secure Information Systems George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030-4444 email: [email protected] The goals of the Springer International Series on ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SECURITY are, one, to establish the state of the art of, and set the course for future research in information security and, two, to serve as a central reference source for advanced and timely topics in information security research and development. The scope of this series includes all aspects of computer and network security and related areas such as fault tolerance and software assurance. ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SECURITY aims to publish thorough and cohesive overviews of specific topics in information security, as well as works that are larger in scope or that contain more detailed background information than can be accommodated in shorter survey articles. The series also serves as a forum for topics that may not have reached a level of maturity to warrant a comprehensive textbook treatment. Researchers, as well as developers, are encouraged to contact Professor Sushil Jajodia with ideas for books under this series. Additional tities in the series: HOP INTEGRITY IN THE INTERNET by Chin-Tser Huang and Mohamed G. Gouda; ISBN-10: 0-387-22426-3 PRIVACY PRESERVING DATA MINING by Jaideep Vaidya, Chris Clifton and Michael Zhu; ISBN-10: 0-387- 25886-8 BIOMETRIC USER AUTHENTICATION FOR IT SECURITY: From Fundamentals to Handwriting by Claus Vielhauer; ISBN-10: 0-387-26194-X IMPACTS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGY FOR INTERNET SECURITY.'Enabled Information Small-Medium Enterprises (TEISMES) by Charles A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Warfare Narratives May Chill Pandemic Cooperation No
    ISPSW Strategy Series: Focus on Defense and International Security Issue Bio-warfare Narratives May Chill Pandemic Cooperation No. 688 Dr Christina Lin April 2020 Bio-warfare Narratives May Chill Pandemic Cooperation Dr. Christina Lin April 2020 Abstract After a temporary détente between the US and China to put aside the blame game and cooperate to fight Covid- 19, it seems conspiracy theories are once again flaring up and sabotaging joint efforts to control the pandemic. Washington is pushing a narrative that the virus may have escaped from a Wuhan bioweapons lab, while Beijing has a counter-narrative that US soldiers may have brought the virus from a Fort Detrick bioweapons lab to the October Military Games in Wuhan. As this escalates, and just as both countries are flattening the curve to consider reopening their economies, the sudden tit-for-tat bio-warfare narratives may throw both countries back into chaos. About ISPSW The Institute for Strategic, Political, Security and Economic Consultancy (ISPSW) is a private institute for research and consultancy. The ISPSW is an objective, task-oriented and politically non-partisan institute. In the ever more complex international environment of globalized economic processes and worldwide political, ecological, social and cultural change, which occasions both major opportunities and risks, decision-makers in the economic and political arena depend more than ever before on the advice of highly qualified experts. ISPSW offers a range of services, including strategic analyses, security consultancy, executive coaching and intercultural competency. ISPSW publications examine a wide range of topics connected with politics, the economy, international relations, and security/ defense.
    [Show full text]