The Economist/Yougov Poll September 8 - 10, 2019 - 1500 US Adult Citizens

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Economist/Yougov Poll September 8 - 10, 2019 - 1500 US Adult Citizens The Economist/YouGov Poll September 8 - 10, 2019 - 1500 US Adult citizens List of Tables 1. Direction of country............................................................................. 2 2. Direction of news stories about the economy ............................................................... 4 3. National unemployment problem...................................................................... 6 4. Local unemployment problem ....................................................................... 8 5. Best Economic Indicator .......................................................................... 10 6. Current unemployment rate......................................................................... 12 7. Knowledge of Direction of Previous Months Unemployment Rate .................................................... 14 8. Good Job Indicator ............................................................................. 16 9. Trump Best Economic Indicator....................................................................... 18 10. Improving Economy............................................................................ 20 11. Economy better if Democrat elected ................................................................... 22 12. Economy better if Trump reelected .................................................................... 24 13. Support for Trump policies......................................................................... 26 14. Attention to 2020 Election......................................................................... 29 15. Party unity - Democrats.......................................................................... 31 16. Party unity - Republicans ......................................................................... 33 17A. Future Event Likelihood — Donald Trump will not win reelection in 2020............................................... 35 17B. Future Event Likelihood — Donald Trump will not run for reelection in 2020 ............................................. 37 17C. Future Event Likelihood — Donald Trump will leave office before the next presidential election................................... 39 18A. Favorability of politicians — Michael Bennet .............................................................. 41 18B. Favorability of politicians — Joe Biden ................................................................. 43 18C. Favorability of politicians — Cory Booker................................................................ 45 18D. Favorability of politicians — Steve Bullock................................................................ 47 18E. Favorability of politicians — Pete Buttigieg ............................................................... 49 18F. Favorability of politicians — Julian Castro................................................................ 51 18G. Favorability of politicians — Bill de Blasio................................................................ 53 18H. Favorability of politicians — John Delaney ............................................................... 55 18I. Favorability of politicians — Tulsi Gabbard................................................................ 57 18J. Favorability of politicians — Kamala Harris ............................................................... 59 18K. Favorability of politicians — Amy Klobuchar............................................................... 61 18L. Favorability of politicians — Wayne Messam .............................................................. 63 18M. Favorability of politicians — Beto O’Rourke............................................................... 65 18N. Favorability of politicians — Tim Ryan.................................................................. 67 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll September 8 - 10, 2019 - 1500 US Adult citizens 18O. Favorability of politicians — Bernie Sanders .............................................................. 69 18P. Favorability of politicians — Mark Sanford................................................................ 71 18Q. Favorability of politicians — Joe Sestak................................................................. 73 18R. Favorability of politicians — Tom Steyer................................................................. 75 18S. Favorability of politicians — Elizabeth Warren ............................................................. 77 18T. Favorability of politicians — Joe Walsh ................................................................. 79 18U. Favorability of politicians — William Weld................................................................ 81 18V. Favorability of politicians — Marianne Williamson............................................................ 83 18W. Favorability of politicians — Andrew Yang ............................................................... 85 19. Vote in 2020 primary or caucus...................................................................... 87 20. Democratic candidates considered.................................................................... 89 21. Democratic candidate - first choice.................................................................... 92 22. Disappointed if Democratic nominee................................................................... 95 23. Satisfied with Democratic candidate choices............................................................... 99 24. Policy agreement or winning more important...............................................................100 25. Republican candidate - first choice....................................................................102 26. Generic Presidential Vote.........................................................................104 27A. Electability — Joe Biden.........................................................................106 27B. Electability — Cory Booker........................................................................108 27C. Electability — Pete Buttigieg.......................................................................110 27D. Electability — Julian Castro .......................................................................112 27E. Electability — Kamala Harris.......................................................................114 27F. Electability — Amy Klobuchar ......................................................................116 27G. Electability — Beto O’Rourke ......................................................................118 27H. Electability — Bernie Sanders......................................................................120 27I. Electability — Elizabeth Warren .....................................................................122 27J. Electability — Andrew Yang .......................................................................124 28. Interest in Democratic debates ......................................................................126 29. Debate participants ............................................................................128 30. Watch Democratic debate.........................................................................130 31. Democratic debate importance......................................................................131 32. Expected to do best in debate.......................................................................133 33. Looking forward to future debates.....................................................................135 34. Undersand environmental issues.....................................................................136 35A. Support for environmental policies — Requiring oil and gas companies to report methane emissions ...............................138 35B. Support for environmental policies — Banning the use of hydrofluorocarbons in air conditioners and regrigerators ........................139 35C. Support for environmental policies — Banning the use of gasoline that uses 15% ethanol during summertime ..........................140 35D. Support for environmental policies — Withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement.........................................141 2 The Economist/YouGov Poll September 8 - 10, 2019 - 1500 US Adult citizens 35E. Support for environmental policies — Water pollution regulations for fracking on federal and Indian lands .............................142 35F. Support for environmental policies — Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge........................................143 35G. Support for environmental policies — Opening most of U.S. coastal waters to oil and gas drilling..................................144 35H. Support for environmental policies — Prohibiting coal companies from dumping mining debris in local streams..........................145 35I. Support for environmental policies — Oil and gas exploration on federal or Indian lands.......................................146 35J. Support for environmental policies — Requiring all new lightbulbs to be energy efficient LED or flourescent ............................147 36A. Climate Change Plan — Joe Biden...................................................................148 36B. Climate Change Plan — Cory Booker..................................................................149 36C. Climate Change Plan — Pete Buttigieg.................................................................150 36D. Climate Change Plan — Julian Castro .................................................................151 36E. Climate Change Plan — Kamala Harris.................................................................152
Recommended publications
  • TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Introduction
    TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Teaching, Research & International Policy (TRIP) Project Global Research Institute (GRI) https://trip.wm.edu/home Principal Investigators: Susan Peterson, William & Mary Ryan Powers, University of Georgia Michael J. Tierney, William & Mary Data Contacts: Eric Parajon or Emily Jackson Phone: (757) 221-1466 Email: i [email protected] Methodology: We attempted to contact all international relations (IR) scholars in the U.S. We define IR scholars as individuals who are employed at a college or university in a political science department or professional school and who teach or conduct research on issues that cross international borders. Of the 4,752 scholars across the U.S. that we contacted, 971 responded. The resulting response rate is approximately 20.43 percent. The poll was open 10/30/2019-12/14/2019. Our sample is roughly similar to the broader International Relations scholar population in terms of gender, academic rank and university type. Our sample includes a higher percentage of men and a higher percentage of tenured and tenure track faculty than the overall scholar population. Introduction By Emily Jackson, Eric Parajon, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney We are pleased to share the results of the 12th Teaching, Research and International Policy (TRIP) Snap Poll, fielded with the support of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Our polls provide real-time data in the wake of significant policy proposals, during international crises, and on emerging foreign policy debates. In this poll, we asked questions on the 2020 Presidential Election, President Trump’s foreign policy actions, and impeachment.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks E1015 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS
    May 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks E1015 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS THE COURTS THWART THE EPA'S doing nothing at all and shutting down an CONGRATULATING THE MEN'S POWER GRAB industry. The governing case (Lead Indus- VOLLEYBALL TEAM OF BYU tries Association v. EPA) gave the EPA this broad power because it was issued by the HON. MICHAEL G. OXLEY D.C. Circuit five days before the Supreme HON. CHRIS CANNON OF OHIO Court's benzene decision, and thus was unaf- OF UTAH IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES fected by the latter ruling. But it was only a IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES matter of time before the EPA's power would Wednesday, May 19, 1999 collide with the Supreme Court's limita- Wednesday, May 19, 1999 Mr. OXLEY. Mr. Speaker, many of us tions. Mr. CANNON. Mr. Speaker, on May 8, 1999 voiced serious concern when the U.S. Envi- For those subject to the EPA's unchecked in Los Angeles, Brigham Young University ronmental Protection Agency approved strict authority, the day of reckoning came none won its first-ever NCAA men's volleyball title in new NAAQs standards affecting ozone and too soon. EPA issued these rules in July 1997 despite: their first-ever NCAA Tournament appearance. particulate matter levels. We warned that EPA They finished the season with a record of 30± was not basing the standards on good Its science advisory board's admonition that the new ozone rule did not deal with 1, suffering their only loss to Long Beach science, and indeed questioned whether the any new significant risk not already ad- State whom they beat in the finals.
    [Show full text]
  • International Child Abduction: Implementa- Tion of the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduc- Tion
    INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION: IMPLEMENTA- TION OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUC- TION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Thursday, October 14, 1999 Serial No. 106±89 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 63±699 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 12:44 Jul 17, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 63699.TXT HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois CYNTHIA A. MCKINNEY, Georgia EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida PETER T. KING, New York PAT DANNER, Missouri STEVE CHABOT, Ohio EARL F. HILLIARD, Alabama MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South BRAD SHERMAN, California Carolina ROBERT WEXLER, Florida MATT SALMON, Arizona STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey AMO HOUGHTON, New York JIM DAVIS, Florida TOM CAMPBELL, California EARL POMEROY, North Dakota JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts KEVIN BRADY, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BARBARA LEE, California PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York GEORGE RADANOVICH, California JOSEPH M.
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality
    Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality JEFFREY W. STEMPEL* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION:M EN WITH NO REGRETS AND INADEQUATE CONCERN................... 2 II. CAPERTON V. MASSEY: JUDICIAL ERROR; WASTED RESOURCES; NEW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—AND LIGHT TREATMENT OF THE PERPETRATOR ............................................................................................... 10 A. The Underlying Action............................................................................... 10 B. The 2004 West Virginia Supreme Court Elections..................................... 12 C. Review and Recusal ................................................................................... 13 D. The Supreme Court Intervenes .................................................................. 16 E. Caperton’s Test for Determining When Recusal Is Required by the Due Process Clause ........................................................................ 17 F. Comparing the “Reasonable Question as to Impartiality” Standard for Nonconstitutional Recusal Under Federal and State Law to the “Serious Risk of Bias” Standard for Constitutional Due Process Under Caperton....................................... 19 G. The Dissenters’ Defense of Justice Benjamin—And Defective Judging ...................................................................................... 25 H. Enablers: Reluctance To Criticize Justice Benjamin................................. 28 * © 2010 Jeffrey W. Stempel. Doris S. & Theodore B. Lee Professor
    [Show full text]
  • 106Th Congress 239
    SOUTH CAROLINA 106th Congress 239 SOUTH CAROLINA (Population 1998, 3,836,000) SENATORS STROM THURMOND, Republican, of Aiken, SC; attorney and educator; committees: chair- man, Senate Armed Services Committee; ranking member, Judiciary; senior member, Veterans' Affairs. Family: born December 5, 1902, in Edgefield, SC; son of John William and Eleanor Gertrude (Strom) Thurmond; married Jean Crouch, 1947 (deceased January 6, 1960); married Nancy Moore, 1968; four children: Nancy Moore (deceased April 14, 1993), James Strom II, Juliana Gertrude, and Paul Reynolds. Education: 1923 graduate of Clemson University; studied law at night under his father, admitted to South Carolina bar, 1930, and admitted to practice in all federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Professional career: teacher and athletic coach (1923±29), county superintendent of education (1929±33), city attorney and county attor- ney (1930±38), State Senator (1933±38), circuit judge (1938±46), Governor of South Carolina (1947±51), serving as chairman of Southern Governors Conference (1950); practiced law in Edgefield, SC (1930±38) and in Aiken, SC (1951±55); adjunct professor of political science at Clemson University and distinguished lecturer at the Strom Thurmond Institute; member, President's Commission on Organized Crime and Commission on the Bicentennial of the Con- stitution. Military service: Reserve officer for 36 years; while serving as judge, volunteered for active duty in World War II the day war was declared against Germany; served with Head- quarters First Army (1942±46), American, European, and Pacific theaters; participated in Nor- mandy invasion with 82nd Airborne Division and landed on D-day; awarded 5 battle stars and 18 decorations, medals, and awards, including the Legion of Merit with Oak Leaf Cluster, Bronze Star Medal with ``V'', Purple Heart, Belgian Order of the Crown, and French Croix de Guerre; major general, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • February 10, 2020 Kerri Kupec Director, Office of Public Affairs U.S
    February 10, 2020 Kerri Kupec Director, Office of Public Affairs U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Re: Request for Expedition of Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Ms. Kupec; Pursuant to Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 16.5(e)(2), Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) requests that you authorize the expedition of a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request CREW made today to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. I have enclosed a copy of this request. The FOIA request seeks copies of all records of communications between President Trump, White House employees, or personal attorneys to President Trump and the Department of Justice regarding investigations, requests for investigations, or other inquiries concerning concerning the family members, campaign committees, campaign staff, or businesses of past and current candidates for president in the 2020 election. The term “past and current candidates for president in the 2020 election” means Michael Bennet, Joe Biden, Michael Bloomberg, Cory Booker, Steve Bullock, Pete Buttigieg, Julian Castro, Bill De Blasio, Roque De La Fuente, John Delaney, Tulsi Gabbard, Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, John Hickenlooper, Jay Inslee, Amy Klobuchar, Wayne Meesam, Seth Moulton, Richard Ojeda, Beto O’Rourke, Deval Patrick, Tim Ryan, Bernie Sanders, Mark Sanford, Joe Sestak, Tom Steyer, Eric Swalwell, Joe Walsh, Elizabeth Warren, William (Bill) F. Weld, Marianne Williamson, and Andrew Yang. CREW has requested that DOJ search the records of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, including but not limited to the Office of United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 881
    1 Union Calendar No. 881 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–1114 ACTIVITIES OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 2, 2019 (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d)(1)) Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdys.gov http://oversight.house.gov/ JANUARY 2, 2016.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 33–945 WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 08, 2019 Jkt 033945 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR1114.XXX HR1114 SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM TREY GOWDY, South Carolina, Chairman JOHN DUNCAN, Tennessee ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland DARRELL ISSA, California CAROLYN MALONEY, New York JIM JORDAN, Ohio ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of MARK SANFORD, South Carolina Columbia JUSTIN AMASH, Michigan WILLIAM LACY CLAY, Missouri PAUL GOSAR, Arizona STEPHEN LYNCH, Massachusetts SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee JIM COOPER, Tennessee VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky ROBIN KELLY, Illinois MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina BRENDA LAWRENCE, Michigan DENNIS ROSS, Florida BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey MARK WALKER, North Carolina RAJA KRISHNAMOORTHI, Illinois ROD BLUM, Iowa JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland JODY B. HICE, Georgia JIMMY GOMEZ, California STEVE RUSSELL, Oklahoma PETER WELCH, Vermont GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Impacts of Proposed Changes to the Clean Water Act Jurisdictional Rule Hearing Committee on Transportation and Infrast
    POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE CLEAN WATER ACT JURISDICTIONAL RULE (113–73) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON WATER RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 11, 2014 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ committee.action?chamber=house&committee=transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 88–239 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 12:12 Jan 29, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\113\WR\6-11-1~1\88239.TXT JEAN COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman DON YOUNG, Alaska NICK J. RAHALL, II, West Virginia THOMAS E. PETRI, Wisconsin PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee, Columbia Vice Chair JERROLD NADLER, New York JOHN L. MICA, Florida CORRINE BROWN, Florida FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas GARY G. MILLER, California ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland SAM GRAVES, Missouri RICK LARSEN, Washington SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan TIMOTHY H. BISHOP, New York DUNCAN HUNTER, California MICHAEL H. MICHAUD, Maine ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas TIMOTHY J.
    [Show full text]
  • Paid Leave That Leaves No One Behind: Paid Leave in Congress and Campaign 2020
    DATA FOR PROGRESS PAID LEAVE THAT LEAVES NO ONE BEHIND: PAID LEAVE IN CONGRESS AND CAMPAIGN 2020 Americans need and want a plan that covers everyone and reflects the diversity of US families, with new revenue to support it. They also reject a plan that require cuts to other programs. Too Few Workers Have Paid Time to can use FMLA leave to take time away from work to care Care, and Nearly Everyone Will Need It for a new child; a seriously ill or injured parent, spouse, or child; their own serious health issue; or to address certain circumstances associated with the overseas deployment Babies are born and adopted. People get sick. At some of a service member or reserve member in their families. point, everyone will provide care to a loved one, receive It also guarantees up to twenty-six weeks of unpaid leave care for themselves, or both—and most people will need for family caregivers to a wounded service member or time away from their jobs to do so. Yet, US public policy veteran.7 and most employers’ policies stand in the way of people being able to care for one another. Workers, families, small The FMLA guarantees eligible workers who take leave businesses, the country’s economy, and taxpayers pay a the right to return to their job and to have their health high price. insurance maintained while they are on leave; some employees may have sick or vacation leave they can use Today, more than four in five US workers (81 percent) do during an FMLA leave but there is no guarantee.8 The 1 not have paid family leave from their jobs for family care, inability to take an unpaid leave means that even workers and 60 percent do not have short-term disability insurance who have FMLA protections may be unable to use them.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe: Democracy on the Line
    ZIMBABWE: DEMOCRACY ON THE LINE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFRICA OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 2000 Serial No. 106±138 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/internationalÐrelations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 66±616 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:50 Sep 21, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 66616.TXT HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina ROBERT E. ANDREWS, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois SHERROD BROWN, Ohio EDWARD R. ROYCE, California CYNTHIA A. MCKINNEY, Georgia PETER T. KING, New York ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida STEVE CHABOT, Ohio PAT DANNER, Missouri MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South EARL F. HILLIARD, Alabama Carolina BRAD SHERMAN, California MATT SALMON, Arizona ROBERT WEXLER, Florida AMO HOUGHTON, New York STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey TOM CAMPBELL, California JIM DAVIS, Florida JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York EARL POMEROY, North Dakota BILL LUTHER, Minnesota WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina GREGORY W.
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Creek Township, Precinct 1 Statistics
    Summary Results Report UNOFFICIAL RESULTS Presidential Primary March 10, 2020 Emmet County Bear Creek Township, Precinct 1 Statistics TOTAL Election Absentee Day Registered Voters - Total 2,575 Registered Voters - DEMOCRATIC 0 PARTY Registered Voters - REPUBLICAN 0 PARTY Registered Voters - NONPARTISAN 2,575 Ballots Cast - Total 954 375 579 Ballots Cast - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 591 290 301 Ballots Cast - REPUBLICAN PARTY 363 85 278 Ballots Cast - NONPARTISAN 0 0 0 Ballots Cast - Blank 2 0 2 Voter Turnout - Total 37.05% Voter Turnout - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 0.00% Voter Turnout - REPUBLICAN PARTY 0.00% Voter Turnout - NONPARTISAN 0.00% DEM President of the United States Vote For 1 TOTAL Election Absentee Day Michael Bennet 1 1 0 Joe Biden 285 121 164 Michael R. Bloomberg 31 2 29 Cory Booker 0 0 0 Pete Buttigieg 24 0 24 Julián Castro 0 0 0 John Delaney 0 0 0 Tulsi Gabbard 3 3 0 Amy Klobuchar 15 1 14 Bernie Sanders 209 158 51 Joe Sestak 0 0 0 Tom Steyer 1 1 0 Elizabeth Warren 16 1 15 Marianne Williamson 0 0 0 Andrew Yang 0 0 0 Uncommitted 5 2 3 Write-In Totals 0 0 0 Total Votes Cast 590 290 300 Contest Totals 591 290 301 Precinct Summary - 03/10/2020 10:30 PM 1 of 44 Report generated with Electionware Copyright © 2007-2019 Summary Results Report UNOFFICIAL RESULTS Presidential Primary March 10, 2020 Emmet County Bear Creek Township, Precinct 1 REP President of the United States Vote For 1 TOTAL Election Absentee Day Mark Sanford 8 2 6 Donald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Relations Authorization for Fiscal Year 2000-2001: Public Diplomcy Programs
    FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001: PUBLIC DIPLOMCY PROGRAMS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEEOF THE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 4, 1999 Serial No. 106-17 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 56-756CC WASHINGTON : 1999 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-058543-0 )44 -&8o COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois CYNTHIA A. McKINNEY, Georgia EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida PETER T. KING, New York PAT DANNER, Missouri STEVE CHABOT, Ohio EARL F. HILLIARD, Alabama MARSHALL "MARK" SANFORD, South BRAD SHERMAN, California Carolina ROBERT WEXLER, Florida MATT SALMON, Arizona STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey AMO HOUGHTON, New York JIM DAVIS, Florida TOM CAMPBELL, California EARL POMEROY, North Dakota JOHN M. McHUGH, New York WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts KEVIN BRADY, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BARBARA LEE, California PAUL E.
    [Show full text]