Section 4: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 4: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Regional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 4: Risk Assessment Section 4: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment List of Tables Table 4.1: Cascading Hazards Resulting from Disasters............................................................................ 185 Table 4.2: Cass County Hazard Summary.................................................................................................. 186 Table 4.3: Cass County Hazard Summary.................................................................................................. 187 Table 4.4: Clay County Hazard Summary .................................................................................................. 188 Table 4.5: Jackson County Hazard Summary ............................................................................................ 189 Table 4.6: Platte County Hazard Summary ............................................................................................... 190 Table 4.7: Ray County Hazard Summary ................................................................................................... 191 List of Hazards Section 4.6 Tornadoes ............................................................................................................................194 Section 4.7 Severe Thunderstorms .........................................................................................................210 Section 4.8 Severe Winter Weather .......................................................................................................223 Section 4.9 Flooding ................................................................................................................................234 Section 4.10 Levee Failures .....................................................................................................................252 Section 4.11 Dam Failures .......................................................................................................................266 Section 4.12 Drought ..............................................................................................................................279 Section 4.13 Heat Waves ........................................................................................................................300 List of Attachments Section 4.14 Attachments .......................................................................................................................311 Attachment 4.1: Summary Assessment of Risk (Cass, Clay, Jackson, Platte and Ray Counties ..............311 Mid-America Regional Council 4.182 June 2020 Regional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 4: Risk Assessment Section 4: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Requirement The plan shall include a risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities §201.6(c)(2): proposed in the strategy to reduce losses from identified hazards. Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable the jurisdiction to identify and prioritize appropriate mitigation actions to reduce losses from identified hazards. 4.1 Overview and Changes from 2015 Plan For the 2020 Plan Update, the Planning Team focused on five natural hazards in the region, a decrease from the 18 previous hazards in the 2015 Plan. The selected hazards are consolidated into five main categories: tornadoes, severe thunderstorms, severe winter weather, heat, and flooding. The heat category includes a profile on drought and heat waves. The flooding category includes a profile on flooding, levee failures, and dam failures. Focusing the Plan on natural disasters was done to narrow each jurisdiction’s focus and simplify the selection of, and implementation for, mitigation efforts. The identification of these priority natural hazards was made by the project steering committee, after seeking input from stakeholders at the April 2, 2019, plan kickoff meeting. The statistical risk assessment, used to show maximum and minimum loss estimates, has been removed from all hazard profiles due to complicated calculations and its inability to assist in mitigation planning efforts. Due to this change, the hazard profile sections have been reformatted from the 2015 Plan. Each hazard profile includes: • Description • Historical Occurrences • Probable Location o Magnitude • Impact • Probability of Future Occurrence • Extent o Probable Duration • Vulnerability Analysis • Problem Statements Each profile may differ slightly due to the characteristics of the hazard. The areas that may be affected by weather-related natural hazards are very difficult to identify. Where possible, the locations or geographic areas that may be affected are mapped. Tornadoes, for example, may affect any part of the Kansas City metropolitan area. Severe thunderstorms, severe winter weather, drought, and heat waves are usually widespread weather events that affect parts of the region or the entire region. In the Probable Locations section of each hazard profile, a magnitude rating was given to the five-county area estimating the percent of a county that could be affected during a hazard event. The methodology is explained in Section 4.2. Mid-America Regional Council 4.183 June 2020 Regional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 4: Risk Assessment Certain locations — because of specific characteristics of the built environment, socio-economic conditions or a combination of these elements — may be more susceptible to these natural hazards. The Vulnerability Analysis in Section 4.5 highlights these areas and populations. Many sources were researched for data and information relating to hazards in the Kansas City metropolitan area. Principal sources of all-hazard information include FEMA and SEMA. The National Climate Data Center (NCDC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Weather Service (NWS) were primary sources of information and statistics on weather and/or climate- related hazards. Hazard-specific databases were also researched for this Plan. For instance, the National Drought Mitigation Center at University Nebraska Lincoln was used for the drought profile. The primary sources of information on dams and dam safety were the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Dam Safety Division and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) National Inventory of Dams (NID). The primary source for information on levees was the National Levee Database. Other sources of information include MARC Research Services Department; city and county Web sites and officials; existing county, regional and state plans, reports and documents; newspaper and news organization Web sites, articles and accounts of natural disasters; other state and federal agencies, such as the U.S. Census Bureau and Missouri Census Data Center (MCDC); and colleges and universities, especially the University of Missouri and University of Missouri Extension. References are noted at the end of each hazard profile with a bibliography of research sources in Appendix C: Maps and References. Several data deficiencies noted in the 2015 Plan have been corrected or new sources of information identified. These are noted where applicable. 4.1.1 Hazards Not Included and Reasons for Elimination While the Plan was consolidated to only include natural hazards, there are two natural hazards that were removed from the Plan. Wildland fires and earthquakes are not included in this Plan due to low probabilities. In the 2015 Plan, earthquakes rated ‘low’ in all modified Mercalli levels for future probable severity. From 2002-2015, the maximum percentage of any portion of any county affected by wildfires, was 7.5 percent. The majority of every county in the planning area was 0%-1% affected by wildland fires. All man-made hazards were removed from this Plan to help jurisdictions narrow their mitigation efforts. The following hazards may be of concern to one or more local jurisdictions but were not included in the 2020 plan: emerging infectious disease, transboundary animal disease, hazardous materials incidents, mass transportation accidents, cyber disruption, public mass shooter incidents, civil disorder, and terrorism. 4.2 Community-Driven Risk Assessment As part of the 2020 Plan Community Profile Survey, each jurisdiction was asked to re-assess its risks for the natural hazards identified in the Plan. “Cascading hazards,” those hazards resulting from a natural disaster, were listed to be taken into account when re-assessing risk. Table 4.1 shows the relationship between the region’s identified disasters and categories of possible cascading hazards. Any of these Mid-America Regional Council 4.184 June 2020 Regional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 4: Risk Assessment cascading hazards alone or in combination with the direct adverse effects of a disaster can potentially impact emergency response operations in affected communities. Table 4.1: Cascading Hazards Resulting from Disasters d/or Loss of Communications Interruption Water Supply Interruption Business Interruption Computer Failure an Records Transportation Interruption Health and/or Environmental Hazards Natural Disaster Power and Tornadoes X X X X X X Severe Thunderstorms X X X Severe Winter Weather X X X X X X Drought X X X Heat Waves X X X Floods X X X X X X Levee Failures X X X X X X Dam Failures X X X X X X X = 50 percent or greater chance of cascading effect resulting from disaster As each county noted the risk each hazard poses to their governance, hazards were re-prioritized or deleted. If a hazard was not of concern, the
Recommended publications
  • Genesis and Geographical Aspects of Glaciers - Vladimir M
    HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE – Vol. IV - Genesis and Geographical Aspects of Glaciers - Vladimir M. Kotlyakov GENESIS AND GEOGRAPHICAL ASPECTS OF GLACIERS Vladimir M. Kotlyakov Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Keywords: Chionosphere, cryosphere, equilibrium line, firn line, glacial climate, glacier, glacierization, glaciosphere, ice, seasonal snow line, snow line, snow-patch Contents 1. Introduction 2. Properties of natural ice 3. Cryosphere, glaciosphere, chionosphere 4. Snow-patches and glaciers 5. Basic boundary levels of snow and ice 6. Measures of glacierization 7. Occurrence of glaciers 8. Present-day glacierization of the Arctic Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary There exist ten crystal variants of ice and one amorphous form in Nature, however only one form ice-1 is distributed on the Earth. Ten other ice variants steadily exist only under a certain combinations of pressure, specific volume and temperature of medium, and those are not typical for our planet. The ice density is less than that of water by 9%, and owing to this water reservoirs are never totally frozen., Thus life is sustained in them during the winter time. As a rule, ice is much cleaner than water, and specific gas-ice compounds called as crystalline hydrates are found in ice. Among the different spheres surrounding our globe there are cryosphere (sphere of the cold), glaciosphere (sphere of snow and ice) and chionosphere (that part of the troposphere where the annual amount of solid precipitation exceeds their losses). The chionosphere envelopes the Earth with a shell 3 to 5 km in thickness. In the present epoch, snow and ice cover 14.2% of the planet’s surface and more than half of the land surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive High-Pressure Ices Eos for Icy World Interior
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 12, EPSC2018-579, 2018 European Planetary Science Congress 2018 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2018 Comprehensive high-pressure ices EoS for icy world interior Baptiste Journaux (1,2), J. Michael Brown (1), Anna Pakhomova (3), Ines Colligns, (4), Sylvain Petitgirard (5), Jason Ott (1) (1) University of Washington, Seattle, USA, (2) NASA Astrobiology Institute, (3) DESY, Hamburg, Germany, (4) ESRF, Grenoble, France, (5) Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Bayreuth, Germany. Abstract recovered quenched sample at ambient pressure [6]. Ice VI has been also poorly investigated, and even if New X-Ray diffraction (XRD) volume data on ice recent work has determined its compressibility above III, V and VI were collected in-situ in the 200-1800 300K [7], lower temperature data are still very MPa and 220-300 K range. The accuracy and density sparse. of the data allow to derive Mie-Gruneisen equations of state (EoS), providing other thermodynamic 2.Experimental approach parameter such as their thermal expansion coefficient, bulk modulus or heat capacity as a To complete the lack of volume data for high function of pressure and temperature. These new pressure ices, we performed in-situ single-crystal and comprehensive EoS enable accurate thermodynamic powder X-ray diffraction experiment on ices III and calculation of ice polymorphs in a framework V and VI grown in a cryostat cooled diamond anvil directly usable for planetary interior modelling. cell (DAC) at the ID15B beamline of the European Synchrotron Research Facility. We were able to 1.Introduction obtain many volume pressure-temperature data in the Water is distinguished for its rich pressure (P) – 200-1800 MPa and 220-300 K range for ice III, ice V temperature (T) phase diagram: currently, in which and ice VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Challenges Faced by Arctic Ships
    NTIS # PB2011- SSC-461 STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES FACED BY ARCTIC SHIPS This document has been approved For public release and sale; its Distribution is unlimited SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE 2011 Ship Structure Committee RADM P.F. Zukunft RDML Thomas Eccles U. S. Coast Guard Assistant Commandant, Chief Engineer and Deputy Commander Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security For Naval Systems Engineering (SEA05) and Stewardship Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Mr. H. Paul Cojeen Dr. Roger Basu Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Senior Vice President American Bureau of Shipping Mr. Christopher McMahon Mr. Victor Santos Pedro Director, Office of Ship Construction Director Design, Equipment and Boating Safety, Maritime Administration Marine Safety, Transport Canada Mr. Kevin Baetsen Dr. Neil Pegg Director of Engineering Group Leader - Structural Mechanics Military Sealift Command Defence Research & Development Canada - Atlantic Mr. Jeffrey Lantz, Mr. Edward Godfrey Commercial Regulations and Standards for the Director, Structural Integrity and Performance Division Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship Dr. John Pazik Mr. Jeffery Orner Director, Ship Systems and Engineering Research Deputy Assistant Commandant for Engineering and Division Logistics SHIP STRUCTURE SUB-COMMITTEE AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING (ABS) DEFENCE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CANADA ATLANTIC Mr. Craig Bone Dr. David Stredulinsky Mr. Phil Rynn Mr. John Porter Mr. Tom Ingram MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (MARAD) MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND (MSC) Mr. Chao Lin Mr. Michael W. Touma Mr. Richard Sonnenschein Mr. Jitesh Kerai NAVY/ONR / NAVSEA/ NSWCCD TRANSPORT CANADA Mr. David Qualley / Dr. Paul Hess Natasa Kozarski Mr. Erik Rasmussen / Dr. Roshdy Barsoum Luc Tremblay Mr. Nat Nappi, Jr. Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Blocking of Snow/Water Slurry Flow in Pipeline Caused by Compression-Strengthening of Snow Column
    Sustainability 2014, 6, 530-544; doi:10.3390/su6020530 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article Blocking of Snow/Water Slurry Flow in Pipeline Caused by Compression-Strengthening of Snow Column Masataka Shirakashi 1,*, Shuichi Yamada 2, Yoshitaka Kawada 3 and Takero Hirochi 4 1 Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Univeristi Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 53300, Malaysia 2 Nagaoka University of Technology, 1603-1 Kamitomioka, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Nagaoka National College of Technology, 888 Nishikatakai, Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Toba National College of Maritime Technology, 1-1 Ikegami, Toba, Mie, Japan; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +60-(0)3-2203-1318; Fax: +60-(0)3-2203-1266. Received: 7 November 2013; in revised form: 8 January 2014 / Accepted: 13 January 2014 / Published: 27 January 2014 Abstract: In earlier works by the present authors, two systems for sustainable energy were proposed: (i) a system for urban snow removal in winter and storage for air conditioning in summer, applied to Nagaoka City, which suffers heavy snow fall every winter, and (ii) a district cooling system utilizing latent heat of ice to reduce the size of storage reservoir and transportation pipeline system. In these systems, the hydraulic conveying of snow or ice through pump-and-pipeline is the key technique to be developed, since characteristics of snow (ice)/ water slurry is largely different from those of conventional non-cohesive solid particle slurries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Molecular Model Kit © Copyright 2015 Ryler Enterprises, Inc
    Super Models Ice Molecular Model Kit © Copyright 2015 Ryler Enterprises, Inc. Recommended for ages 10-adult ! Caution: Atom centers and vinyl tubing are a choking hazard. Do not eat or chew model parts. Kit Contents: 50 red 4-peg oxygen atom centers (2 spares) 100 white hydrogen 2-peg atom centers (2 spares) 74 clear, .87”hydrogen bonds (2 spares) 100 white, .87” covalent bonds (2 spares) Related Kits Available: Chemistry of Water Phone: 806-438-6865 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.rylerenterprises.com Address: 5701 1st Street, Lubbock, TX 79416 The contents of this instruction manual may be reprinted for personal use only. Any and all of the material in this PDF is the sole property of Ryler Enterprises, Inc. Permission to reprint any or all of the contents of this manual for resale must be submitted to Ryler Enterprises, Inc. General Information Ice, of course, ordinarily refers to water in the solid phase. In the terminology of astronomy, an ice can be the solid form of any element or compound which is usually a liquid or gas. This kit is designed to investigate the structure of ice formed by water. Fig. 1 Two water molecules bonded by a hydrogen bond. Water ice is very common throughout the universe. According to NASA, within our solar system ice is The symbol δ means partial, so when a plus sign is found in comets, asteroids, and several moons of added, the combination means partial positive the outer planets, and it has been located in charge. The opposite obtains when a negative sign interstellar space as well.
    [Show full text]
  • © Cambridge University Press Cambridge
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-80620-6 - Creep and Fracture of Ice Erland M. Schulson and Paul Duval Index More information Index 100-year wave force, 336 friction and fracture, 289, 376 60° dislocations, 17, 82, 88 indentation failure, 345 microstructure, 45, 70, 237, 255, 273 abrasion, 337 multiscale fracture and frictional accommodation processes of basal slip, 165 sliding, 386 acoustic emission, 78, 90, 108 nested envelopes, 377 across-column cleavage cracks, 278 pressure–area relationship, 349, 352 across-column confinement, 282 S2 growth texture, 246, 273 across-column cracks, 282, 306, SHEBA faults, 371 across-column loading, 275 SHEBA stress states, 377 across-column strength, 246, 249, 275 Arctic Ocean, 1, 45, 190, 361 activation energy, 71, 84, 95, 111, 118, 131 aspect ratio, 344 activation volume, 114, 182 atmospheric ice, 219, 221, 241, 243 activity of pyramidal slip systems, 158 atmospheric icing, 31 activity of slip systems, 168 atmospheric impurities, 113 adiabatic heating, 291, 348 atomic packing factor, 9 adiabatic softening, 291 audible report, 240 affine self-consistent model, 160 avalanches, 206 air bubbles, 38 air-hydrate crystals, 37 bands, 89 albedo, 363 basal activity, 162 aligned first-year sea ice, 246 basal dislocations, 77 along-column confinement, 282 basal planes, 214, along-column confining stress, 282, basal screw dislocations, 77, 87 along-column strength, 244, 275 basal shear bands, 163 ammonia dihydrate, 181 basal slip, 18, 77, 127, 228 ammonia–water system, 186 basal slip lines, 77 amorphous forms
    [Show full text]
  • Creep Displacements Induced from Waste Rock Loading
    Geotechnical Engineering Creep Displacements Induced from Waste Rock Loading J. Kurylo, M. Rykaart, & A. Lizcano SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc, Vancouver, BC, Canada ABSTRACT: Waste rock deformations were measured on a high altitude dump using survey prisms and inclinometers. Rates of downslope advancement of about 0.2 to 0.5 m/day (70 to 180 m/year) were measured. This waste dump is founded on very thick (greater than 40 m), warm (approximately -0.5oC) ice-rich permafrost moraine deposits. From satellite observations and site displacement measurements, it was concluded that the ob- served displacement was a result of both movement on the ground surface (sliding at the interface of the waste rock dump and foundation) and movement on a shear strain localization surface within the foundation (i.e. creep).This paper describes how the observational data were used to determine the deformation processes and offers potential mitigation solutions for stopping the continued movement of this waste rock dump. 1 INTRODUCTION Lisiy Glacier is a high altitude glacier (over 4,000 masl) located in a remote area of the Tian-Shan mountain range in Kyrgyzstan. This glacier is in the Kumtor mine project area, which is located about 350 km southeast of the capital of Bishkek and 80 km south of Lake Issyk-Kul, near the border with China (Fig. 1). Prior to mining, the Lisiy Glacier (which includes the Lisiy Cirque Glacier and the Lisiy Valley Glacier) was retreating. When mining started in the region, waste rock and ice was dumped onto the Lisiy Cirque Glacier; the glacier stopped retreating and then started advancing.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbs Energy of Ices III, V and VI: Wholistic Thermodynamics and Elasticity of the Water Phase Diagram to 2300 Mpa. 1. Abstract
    Gibbs energy of ices III, V and VI: wholistic thermodynamics and elasticity of the water phase diagram to 2300 MPa. B. Journaux*1, J.M. Brown1, A. Pakhomova2, I. E. Collings3,4, S. Petitgirard5, P. Espinoza1, J. Ott1,6, F. Cova3,7, G. Garbarino3, M. Hanfland3 1. Abstract: Gibbs energy representations for ice III, V and VI are reported. These were constructed using new measurements of volumes at high pressure over a range of low temperatures combined with calculated vibrational energies grounded in statistical physics. The collection of representations including ice Ih and water (released as the open source “SeaFreeze” framework) allow accurate determinations of thermodynamics properties (phase boundaries, density, heat capacity, bulk modulus, thermal expansivity, chemical potentials) and seismic wave velocities over the entire range of conditions encountered in hydrospheres in our solar system (220-500K to 2300 MPa). These comprehensive representations allow exploration of the rich spectrum of thermodynamic behavior in the H2O system. Although the results are broadly applicable in science and engineering, their use in habitability analysis in water-rich planetary bodies of our solar system and beyond is particularly relevant. 2. Introduction Water is a fundamentally important molecule in scientific fields ranging from biology to engineering, earth and environmental sciences, chemistry or astrophysics. As a common molecular species in our cosmic neighborhood, water ice polymorphs at high pressures in planetary interiors could be the most abundant “mineral group” in the Universe (Hanslmeier 2011). A focus on potentially habitable icy moons and ocean exoplanets hydrospheres (Sotin and Tobie 2004; Vance and Brown 2013; Journaux et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dielectric Anomalies in Crystalline Ice: Indirect Evidence of the Existence of a Liquid-Liquid Critical
    Dielectric Anomalies in Crystalline Ice: Indirect evidence of the Existence of a Liquid-liquid Critical Point in H 2O Fei Yen 1,2* , Zhenhua Chi 1,2 , Adam Berlie 1† , Xiaodi Liu 1, Alexander F. Goncharov 1,3 1Key Laboratory for Materials Physics, Institute of Solid State Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, P. R. China 2High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, P. R. China 3Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington D.C., 20015, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] †Present address: ISIS Neutron and Muon Source, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom “This document is the unedited Author’s version of a Submitted Work that was subsequently accepted for publication in [The Journal of Physical Chemistry C], copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review. To access the final edited and published work see http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07635 ” Abstract: The phase diagram of H 2O is extremely complex; in particular, it is believed that a second critical point exists deep below the supercooled water (SCW) region where two liquids of different densities coexist. The problem however, is that SCW freezes at temperatures just above this hypothesized liquid-liquid critical point (LLCP) so direct experimental verification of its existence has yet to be realized. Here, we report two anomalies in the complex dielectric constant during warming in the form of a peak anomaly near Tp=203 K and a sharp minimum near Tm=212 K from ice samples prepared from SCW under hydrostatic pressures up to 760 MPa.
    [Show full text]
  • Triple Point
    AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 1 of 2 www.accessscience.com Triple point Contributed by: Robert L. Scott Publication year: 2014 A particular temperature and pressure at which three different phases of one substance can coexist in equilibrium. In common usage these three phases are normally solid, liquid, and gas, although triple points can also occur with two solid phases and one liquid phase, with two solid phases and one gas phase, or with three solid phases. According to the Gibbs phase rule, a three-phase situation in a one-component system has no degrees of freedom (that is, it is invariant). Consequently, a triple point occurs at a unique temperature and pressure, because any change in either variable will result in the disappearance of at least one of the three phases. See also: PHASE EQUILIBRIUM . Triple points are shown in the illustration of part of the phase diagram for water. Point A is the well-known ◦ triple point for Ice I (the ordinary low-pressure solid form) + liquid + water + water vapor at 0.01 C (273.16 K) and a pressure of 0.00603 atm (4.58 mmHg or 611 pascals). In 1954 the thermodynamic temperature scale (the absolute or Kelvin scale) was redefined by setting this triple-point temperature for water equal to exactly 273.16 K. Thus, the kelvin (K), the unit of thermodynamic temperature, is defined to be 1 ∕ 273.16 of the thermodynamic temperature of this triple point. ◦ Point B , at 251.1 K ( − 7.6 F) and 2047 atm (207.4 megapascals) pressure, is the triple point for liquid water + Ice ◦ I + Ice III; and point C , at 238.4 K ( − 31 F) and 2100 atm (212.8 MPa) pressure, is the triple point for Ice I + Ice II + Ice III.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Modeling of the Densification of Snow/Firn and Ice in the Upper Part of Polar Ice Sheets
    Title Physical modeling of the densification of snow/firn and ice in the upper part of polar ice sheets Author(s) Arnaud, Laurent; Barnola, Jean M.; Duval, Paul Citation Physics of Ice Core Records, 285-305 Issue Date 2000 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/32472 Type proceedings Note International Symposium on Physics of Ice Core Records. Shikotsukohan, Hokkaido, Japan, September 14-17, 1998. File Information P285-305.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Physical modeling of the densification of snow/firn and ice III the upper part of polar ice sheets Laurent Arnaud, Jean M. Barnola and Paul Duval Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Geophysique de l'Environnement, CNRS, B.P. 96, 38402 St. Martin d'Heres Cedex, FRANCE x o 20 40 60 I .r:: CL -OJ so o 100 Age at .84 density SAE t5 data 2850 yrs Herron·Langway 2850 yrs '... ' ", Pimienta 2950 yrs , II 120 Alley-Arzt 2800 yrs , II , 1\ ----- Herron·Langway 7400 yrs ', \ ----- Pimienta 6750 yrs , 140 ----- Alley-Arzt 6450 yrs , 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 o.s 0_9 density Plalc 8. L. Arnaud el al. , Figure 3. X l Close-off Age 3000 4000 "'" .'!l'" 0; 0 5000 6000 a) Vc=I(T), OO=I(T) ---- b) Vc=I(Gas Cont.), OO=I(T) ---- c) Vc=I(Gas Cont.), OO=I(Gas Cont. ---- d Pimienta, VC=f(T) Close-Off depth 90 100 5 .<:: a.OJ 110 "C 120 130 o 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Depth (m) Plate 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Release on the Pressure Along the Melting and Sublimation Curves of Ordinary Water Substance
    IAPWS R14-08(2011) The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam Plzeň, Czech Republic September 2011 Revised Release on the Pressure along the Melting and Sublimation Curves of Ordinary Water Substance 2011 International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam Publication in whole or in part is allowed in all countries provided that attribution is given to the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam President: Mr. Karol Daucik Larok s.r.o. SK 96263 Pliesovce, Slovakia Executive Secretary: Dr. R. B. Dooley Structural Integrity Associates, Inc. 2616 Chelsea Drive Charlotte, NC 28209, USA email: [email protected] This revised release replaces the corresponding revised release of 2008 and contains 7 pages. This release has been authorized by the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS) at its meeting in Plzeň, Czech Republic, 4-9 September, 2011, for issue by its Secretariat. The members of IAPWS are: Britain and Ireland, Canada, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Japan, Russia, Scandinavia (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden), and the United States of America, and associate members Argentina and Brazil, France, Italy, and Switzerland. In 1993, IAPWS issued a “Release on the Pressure along the Melting and Sublimation Curves of Ordinary Water Substance.” The empirical equations presented were fitted to relatively old experimental data for the several sections of the melting curve and the sublimation curve. Thus, these equations are not thermodynamically consistent with the subsequently developed IAPWS equations of state for fluid and solid H2O. These equations are “The IAPWS Formulation 1995 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Ordinary Water Substance for General and Scientific Use” [1, 2] and “The Equation of State of H2O Ice Ih” [3, 4].
    [Show full text]