DOCSLIB.ORG

Dominion Voting Systems Ballot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SAMPLE - NOUDFCD . Precinct: 2233364037 Official General Election Ballot Ballot Style: 037 City and County of Broomfield, Colorado Tuesday, November 06, 2018 City and County Clerk How to vote If you make a mistake Optional write-in Correct Incorrect · Cross out the entire name or choice · Completely fill the oval to the left of · Use blue or black ink that you marked by mistake the words “Write-in” · Completely fill the oval to the left of · Completely fill another oval to the left · Then legibly print the name of an your choice of the correct choice eligible write-in candidate on the line · Do not vote for more candidates or choices than indicated for each ballot contest · Do not erase or white out mistakes · Do not sign or initial your ballot or mistakes · You don't have to vote in every race or contest WARNING: Any person who, by use of force or other means, unduly influences an eligible elector to vote in any particular manner or to refrain from voting, or who falsely makes, alters, forges, or counterfeits any mail ballot before or after it has been cast, or who destroys, defaces, mutilates, or tampers with a ballot is subject, upon conviction, to imprisonment, or to a fine, or both. Section 1-7.5-107(3)(b), C.R.S. Federal Offices Colorado Court of Appeals Judge State Measures Representative to the 116th United Shall Judge Rebecca Rankin Freyre of the Amendment Z (CONSTITUTIONAL) Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in office? States Congress Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado District 2 constitution concerning a change to the manner in (Vote for One) Yes No which state senate and state house of representatives districts are drawn, and, in Democratic Shall Judge Elizabeth L. Harris of the Colorado Joe Neguse connection therewith, reforming the existing Court of Appeals be retained in office? legislative reapportionment commission by expanding the commission to twelve members and Peter Yu Republican Yes No authorizing the appointment of members who possess specified qualifications; prohibiting any Shall Judge David J. Richman of the Colorado one political party's control of the commission by Court of Appeals be retained in office? Libertarian requiring that one-third of commissioners will not Roger Barris be affiliated with any political party, one-third of the Yes No commissioners will be affiliated with the state's largest political party, and one-third of the Nick Thomas Independent District Court Judge commissioners will be affiliated with the state's (Signed declaration to limit service to no second largest political party; prohibiting certain more than 3 terms) Shall Judge Jaclyn Brown of the 17th Judicial persons, including professional lobbyists, federal District be retained in office? campaign committee employees, and federal, state, and local elected officials, from serving on Write-in: Yes No the commission; limiting judicial review of a map to a determination by the supreme court of whether State Offices Shall Judge Sharon D. Holbrook of the 17th the commission or its nonpartisan staff committed Judicial District be retained in office? an abuse of discretion; requiring the commission Governor / Lieutenant Governor to draw state legislative districts using . communities of interest as well as political (Vote for One Pair) Yes No subdivisions, such as cities and counties, and then Jared Polis / Democratic Shall Judge Edward Moss of the 17th Judicial to maximize the number of competitive state Dianne Primavera District be retained in office? legislative seats to the extent possible; and prohibiting maps from being drawn to dilute the electoral influence of any racial or ethnic group or Republican Walker Stapleton / Yes No to protect any incumbent, any political candidate, Lang Sias Shall Judge Donald S. Quick of the 17th Judicial or any political party? District be retained in office? Bill Hammons / Unity Yes/For No/Against Eric Bodenstab Yes No Amendment A (CONSTITUTIONAL) Scott Helker / Libertarian County Court Judge Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Michele Poague constitution that prohibits slavery and involuntary Shall Judge Amy Elizabeth Bockman of the servitude as punishment for a crime and thereby Broomfield County Court be retained in office? prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude in all Secretary of State circumstances? . (Vote for One) Yes No Yes/For No/Against Wayne Williams Republican Ballot Measures Amendment 73 (CONSTITUTIONAL) Democratic Ballot questions referred by the general assembly or any Jena Griswold political subdivision are listed by letter, and ballot SHALL STATE TAXES BE INCREASED questions initiated by the people are listed numerically. $1,600,000,000 ANNUALLY BY AN American Amanda Campbell Constitution A ballot question listed as an "amendment" proposes a AMENDMENT TO THE COLORADO change to the Colorado constitution, and a ballot CONSTITUTION AND A CHANGE TO THE Blake Huber Approval Voting question listed as a "proposition" proposes a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes. A "yes/for" vote on any COLORADO REVISED STATUTES ballot question is a vote in favor of changing current law CONCERNING FUNDING RELATING TO State Treasurer or existing circumstances, and a "no/against" vote on . PRESCHOOL THROUGH HIGH SCHOOL (Vote for One) any ballot question is a vote against changing current law or existing circumstances. PUBLIC EDUCATION, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, CREATING AN Brian Watson Republican State Measures EXCEPTION TO THE SINGLE RATE STATE INCOME TAX FOR REVENUE THAT IS Democratic Amendment V (CONSTITUTIONAL) Dave Young DEDICATED TO THE FUNDING OF PUBLIC Gerald F. Kilpatrick American Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado SCHOOLS; INCREASING INCOME TAX RATES Constitution constitution concerning a reduction in the age INCREMENTALLY FOR INDIVIDUALS, TRUSTS, Attorney General qualification for a member of the general assembly AND ESTATES USING FOUR TAX BRACKETS . STARTING AT .37% FOR INCOME ABOVE (Vote for One) from twenty-five years to twenty-one years? $150,000 AND INCREASING TO 3.62% FOR Democratic INCOME ABOVE $500,000; INCREASING THE Phil Weiser Yes/For No/Against CORPORATE INCOME TAX RATE BY 1.37%; George Brauchler Republican Amendment W (CONSTITUTIONAL) FOR PURPOSES OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY TAXES, REDUCING THE CURRENT William F. Robinson III Libertarian Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT RATE OF 7.2% constitution concerning a change in the format of TO 7.0% AND THE CURRENT State Board of Education Member the election ballot for judicial retention elections? NONRESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT RATE OF Congressional District 2 29%TO 24%; REQUIRING THE REVENUE Yes/For No/Against (Vote for One) FROM THE INCOME TAX INCREASES TO BE Johnny Barrett Republican Amendment X (CONSTITUTIONAL) DEPOSITED IN A DEDICATED PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND AND ALLOWING THE Angelika Schroeder Democratic Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado REVENUE COLLECTED TO BE RETAINED AND constitution concerning changing the industrial SPENT AS VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE Regent of the University of Colorado hemp definition from a constitutional definition to a CHANGES; REQUIRING THE LEGISLATURE TO At Large statutory definition? ANNUALLY APPROPRIATE MONEY FROM THE (Vote for One) FUND TO SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO SUPPORT Lesley Smith Democratic Yes/For No/Against EARLY CHILDHOOD THROUGH HIGH SCHOOL PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS ON AN Ken Montera Republican Amendment Y (CONSTITUTIONAL) EQUITABLE BASIS THROUGHOUT THE STATE WITHOUT DECREASING GENERAL FUND Unity Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Christopher E. Otwell APPROPRIATIONS; DIRECTING THE constitution concerning a change to the way that LEGISLATURE TO ENACT, REGULARLY James K. Treibert Libertarian congressional districts are drawn, and, in REVIEW, AND REVISE WHEN NECESSARY, A connection therewith, taking the duty to draw NEW PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE LAW THAT State Representative congressional districts away from the state MEETS SPECIFIED CRITERIA; UNTIL THE District 33 legislature and giving it to an independent LEGISLATURE HAS ENACTED A NEW PUBLIC (Vote for One) commission, composed of twelve citizens who SCHOOL FINANCE LAW, REQUIRING THE Republican possess specified qualifications; prohibiting any Eric Rutherford MONEY IN THE FUND TO BE ANNUALLY one political party's control of the commission by Democratic APPROPRIATED FOR SPECIFIED EDUCATION Matt Gray requiring that one-third of commissioners will not PROGRAMS AND PURPOSES; REQUIRING be affiliated with any political party, one-third of the Libertarian THE MONEY IN THE FUND TO BE USED TO Kim Tavendale commissioners will be affiliated with the state's SUPPORT ONLY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; Independent largest political party, and one-third of the Jay Geyer REQUIRING GENERAL FUND commissioners will be affiliated with the state's APPROPRIATIONS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION second largest political party; prohibiting certain Judicial Retention Questions TO INCREASE BY INFLATION, UP TO 5%, persons, including professional lobbyists, federal ANNUALLY; AND REQUIRING THE (Vote Yes or No) campaign committee employees, and federal, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TO state, and local elected officials, from serving on COMMISSION A STUDY OF THE USE OF THE Colorado Supreme Court Justice the commission; limiting judicial review of a map to MONEY IN THE FUND WITHIN FIVE YEARS? Shall Justice Richard L. Gabriel of the Colorado a determination by the supreme court of whether Supreme Court be retained in office? the commission or its nonpartisan staff committed an abuse of discretion; requiring the commission
Recommended publications
  • Unfunded Mandates: a Unifying Principle of All Counties Ecounty Lines | November 2020

    Unfunded Mandates: a Unifying Principle of All Counties Ecounty Lines | November 2020

    Protection from Unfunded Mandates: A Unifying Principle of All Counties eCounty Lines | November 2020 There are various protections in place for local governments from unfunded mandates, both in state statute, as well as the execution of laws by the Governor and his departments. However, there is no absolute protection. Collectively, commissioners—assisted by Colorado Counties Inc.—are the strongest defense against unfunded mandates. A statute enacted in 1991 prohibits unfunded mandates, with some exceptions. “No new state mandate or an increase in the level of service…shall be mandated by the general assembly or any state agency on any local government unless the state provides additional moneys to reimburse such local government for the costs …such mandate or increased level of service for an existing state mandate shall be optional on the part of the local government” (CRS 29-1-304.5). The Colorado Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR) took this statute a step further by allowing local governments to end their participation in a program, if funding was inadequate. “Except for public education through grade 12 or as required of a local district by federal law, a local district may reduce or end its subsidy to any program delegated to it by the general assembly for administration” (Article X, Section 20(9)). Unfortunately, in 1995 these two provisions were defeated twice via State Supreme Court decisions. In the first case, Weld County attempted to withhold their portion of payments towards a public assistance program administered through the county. However, the court did not find this payment to be a subsidy (as referenced in TABOR) and declared that as an arm of the state, counties were essentially part of the state and therefore could not subsidize themselves, so the exemption was not allowed [Romer v.

  • 2010 General Election

    Official Ballot State Offices State Offices Judiciary General Election GOVERNOR/LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 51 JUSTICE OF THE Larimer County, Colorado (Vote for One Pair) (Vote for One) COLORADO SUPREME COURT Tuesday, November 2, 2010 (Vote Yes or No) Shall Justice Alex J. Martinez of the John Hickenlooper / Joseph Garcia Brian DelGrosso Colorado Supreme Court be retained in Democratic Republican SAMPLE BALLOT office? Dan Maes / Tambor Williams Bill McCreary YES Republican Democratic NO Jaimes Brown / Ken Wyble STATE REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 52 JUSTICE OF THE Libertarian (Vote for One) COLORADO SUPREME COURT Scott Doyle (Vote Yes or No) Clerk and Recorder Shall Justice Nancy E. Rice of the Colorado Tom Tancredo / Pat Miller Bob Morain Supreme Court be retained in office? American Constitution Republican Instructions to Voters YES Jason R. Clark / Victoria A. Adams John Kefalas NO To vote, fill in the oval completely. Please Unaffiliated Democratic use black ink. COURT OF APPEALS (Vote Yes or No) Correct Paul Noel Fiorino / Heather A. McKibbin STATE REPRESENTATIVE - DISTRICT 53 Unaffiliated (Vote for One) Shall Judge John Daniel Dailey of the Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in office? Randy Fischer YES Democratic NO Write-In If you mark in any of the incorrect ways SECRETARY OF STATE Dane Brandt COURT OF APPEALS shown below it may be difficult to determine (Vote for One) Republican (Vote Yes or No) your intent. Shall Judge Richard L. Gabriel of the Incorrect Colorado Court of Appeals be retained in Scott Gessler County Offices office? Republican COMMISSIONER - DISTRICT 1 YES (Vote for One) Bernie Buescher NO Democratic Adam Bowen COURT OF APPEALS Democratic (Vote Yes or No) If you make a mistake please ask for a new Amanda Campbell ballot.
  • Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin

    Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin

    Florida Law Review Volume 65 | Issue 3 Article 3 May 2013 Vicarious Aggravators Sam Kamin Justin Marceau Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Sam Kamin and Justin Marceau, Vicarious Aggravators, 65 Fla. L. Rev. 769 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol65/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kamin and Marceau: Vicarious Aggravators VICARIOUS AGGRAVATORS Sam Kamin∗ & Justin Marceau∗∗ Abstract In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court held that the death penalty was constitutional so long as it provided a non-arbitrary statutory mechanism for determining who are the worst of the worst, and therefore, deserving of the death penalty. As a general matter, this process of narrowing the class of death eligible offenders is done through the codification of aggravating factors. If the jury finds beyond a reasonable doubt that one or more aggravating factors exists, then a defendant convicted of murder is eligible for the ultimate sentence. There is, however, a critical, unanswered, and under-theorized issue raised by the use of aggravating factors to serve this constitutionally mandated filtering function. Can death eligibility be predicated on vicarious aggravating factor liability—is there vicarious death penalty liability? A pair of cases, collectively known as the Supreme Court’s Enmund/Tison doctrine, recognize that there is no per se bar on the imposition of the death penalty for non-killing accomplices.
  • The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures

    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures

    The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures The Vermont Public Interest Action Project Office of Career Services Vermont Law School Copyright © 2021 Vermont Law School Acknowledgement The 2021-2022 Guide to State Court Judicial Clerkship Procedures represents the contributions of several individuals and we would like to take this opportunity to thank them for their ideas and energy. We would like to acknowledge and thank the state court administrators, clerks, and other personnel for continuing to provide the information necessary to compile this volume. Likewise, the assistance of career services offices in several jurisdictions is also very much appreciated. Lastly, thank you to Elijah Gleason in our office for gathering and updating the information in this year’s Guide. Quite simply, the 2021-2022 Guide exists because of their efforts, and we are very appreciative of their work on this project. We have made every effort to verify the information that is contained herein, but judges and courts can, and do, alter application deadlines and materials. As a result, if you have any questions about the information listed, please confirm it directly with the individual court involved. It is likely that additional changes will occur in the coming months, which we will monitor and update in the Guide accordingly. We believe The 2021-2022 Guide represents a necessary tool for both career services professionals and law students considering judicial clerkships. We hope that it will prove useful and encourage other efforts to share information of use to all of us in the law school career services community.
  • Jan G. Laitos

    Jan G. Laitos

    Jan G. Laitos John A Carver, Jr. Professor of Law Constitutional Law Environmental and Natural Resources Law B.A., 1968, Yale University J.D., 1971, University of Colorado S.J.D., 1975, University of Wisconsin Jan Laitos holds the John A. Carver Jr. Chair at the Sturm College of Law. He is a regional board member of the Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute; and since 1981 a Trustee of the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation. He was Vice Chair of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission. He was also the Director of the nationally ranked Environmental and Natural Resources Law Program at the University of Denver Law School from 1981 until 2004. In 1996, he was given the University of Denver’s distinguished Teaching Award, and in 2005, he was selected a “DU Law Star.” Prior to joining the faculty at the Law school, he was the law clerk to the Chief Justice for the Colorado Supreme Court, and an attorney with the Office of Legal Counsel within the United States Department of Justice. He is the author of several books and treatises, published by Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, West Academic, Foundation Press, Aspen, Wolters Kluwer, Duke University Press, and Bradford Press. He has worked as a consultant on several cases decided by the 9th Circuit Court of Federal appeals, the Montana Supreme Court, the Nevada Supreme Court, the Idaho Supreme court, and the Colorado Supreme Court, and on several cert. petitions before the United States Supreme Court. He has lectured at Austral University Law School in Buenos Aires, Argentina, at the European Network for Housing Research Institute in Istanbul, Turkey, at the Central European University, Budapest, Hungary, the National University of Ireland at Galway, Ireland, the University of Oslo, Norway, the University of Tarragona, Spain, the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, and the University of Western Sydney, Australia.
  • Supreme Court of Caloratia

    Supreme Court of Caloratia

    Supreme Court of Caloratia 2 East 14lh Avenue Denver, CO 80203 (720)625-5410 BRIAN D. BOATRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Order Regarding Safety in Colorado Courthouses With the recent shift in federal and state guidance regarding mask and social distancing requirements, and given the inconsistency in local public health guidance throughout the pandemic, I am hereby entering this order to ensure safe operations in Colorado courthouses. Safety is paramount in state court operations. Not only do our courthouses see a large volume ofin- person traffic, our necessary and critical operations compel attendance from members of the public for extended periods of time, Colorado courts should continue to err on the side of safety for assembly in both public and private areas to promote public safety and public confidence in our operations. Accordingly, I hereby order that all persons continue to wear facial coverings in all public areas of courthouses and probation offices through June 18,2021. Mask and social distancing requirements in non-public areas of our courthouses are to be determined by the chief judges after consultation with local health officials and in consideration of local circumstances regarding COVID risk and staffing needs. Concerning physical distancing requirements in public areas, our chief judges have discretion, in consultation with local public health officials, to decide appropriate standards for each courthouse after consideration of local circumstances, including vaccination rates, COVID positivity rates and other metrics, and courthouse layout. I will continue to monitor our public health situation and will amend this order as appropriate.
  • 2010-2019 Election Results-Moffat County 2010 Primary Total Reg

    2010-2019 Election Results-Moffat County 2010 Primary Total Reg

    2010-2019 Election Results-Moffat County 2010 Primary Total Reg. Voters 2010 General Total Reg. Voters 2011 Coordinated Contest or Question Party Total Cast Votes Contest or Question Party Total Cast Votes Contest or Question US Senator 2730 US Senator 4681 Ken Buck Republican 1339 Ken Buck Republican 3080 Moffat County School District RE #1 Jane Norton Republican 907 Michael F Bennett Democrat 1104 JB Chapman Andrew Romanoff Democrat 131 Bob Kinsley Green 129 Michael F Bennett Democrat 187 Maclyn "Mac" Stringer Libertarian 79 Moffat County School District RE #3 Maclyn "Mac" Stringer Libertarian 1 Charley Miller Unaffiliated 62 Tony St John John Finger Libertarian 1 J Moromisato Unaffiliated 36 Debbie Belleville Representative to 112th US Congress-3 Jason Napolitano Ind Reform 75 Scott R Tipton Republican 1096 Write-in: Bruce E Lohmiller Green 0 Moffat County School District RE #5 Bob McConnell Republican 1043 Write-in: Michele M Newman Unaffiliated 0 Ken Wergin John Salazar Democrat 268 Write-in: Robert Rank Republican 0 Sherry St. Louis Governor Representative to 112th US Congress-3 Dan Maes Republican 1161 John Salazar Democrat 1228 Proposition 103 (statutory) Scott McInnis Republican 1123 Scott R Tipton Republican 3127 YES John Hickenlooper Democrat 265 Gregory Gilman Libertarian 129 NO Dan"Kilo" Sallis Libertarian 2 Jake Segrest Unaffiliated 100 Jaimes Brown Libertarian 0 Write-in: John W Hargis Sr Unaffiliated 0 Secretary of State Write-in: James Fritz Unaffiliated 0 Scott Gessler Republican 1779 Governor/ Lieutenant Governor Bernie Buescher Democrat 242 John Hickenlooper/Joseph Garcia Democrat 351 State Treasurer Dan Maes/Tambor Williams Republican 1393 J.J.
  • Colorado 2018 Primary Election Results and Analysis

    Colorado 2018 Primary Election Results and Analysis

    June 27, 2018 Colorado 2018 Primary Election Results and Analysis Colorado held its primary election last night, setting the stage for the November general election where Walker Stapleton (R) and Jared Polis (D) will compete to replace term-limited Gov. John Hickenlooper (D). In all the statewide races, substantially more votes were cast in Democratic primary contests than in Republican races. Figures from the secretary of state’s office indicate that, as of midnight, 1,158,700 voters had returned their mail-in ballots, a number that represents more than 30 percent of the state’s total registered voters. Ballots are still being processed, with July 5 being the last day for military and overseas ballots to arrive and the last day for a voter to cure a missing signature or signature discrepancy. Even without the final numbers, it is clear that voter turnout was up significantly from the 2016 primary election when only 21 percent of the electorate participated—an all-time low. This year’s high primary turnout was due in part to Colorado’s new law allowing unaffiliated voters to participate for the first time. Of the 1,158,700 ballots tallied thus far, 280,958 were cast by unaffiliated voters, 412,411 by Republicans and 465,331 by Democrats. Ballots cast in the Democratic primary for governor exceeded those cast in the Republican primary by more than 100,000. This difference was consistent in congressional and state legislative races as well. In a state with voter registration roughly even among Republican, Democrat and unaffiliated voters, this trend is notable and may reflect intensity.
  • COLORADO SUPREME COURT Updated January, 2021

    COLORADO SUPREME COURT Updated January, 2021

    COLORADO SUPREME COURT Updated January, 2021 In FYE 2020, 1,474 new cases were filed in the Supreme Court. Of those 1,272 cases were either petitions for certiorari, asking the court to review decisions of the court of appeals, or original proceedings, asking the court to intervene in cases pending in the trial courts. In both types of cases, the court has discretion to choose which ones it will hear. The remainder of the new filings are direct appeals which the Supreme Court must review. Included in this category are attorney discipline cases, water cases, Public Utility Commission cases, prosecutorial appeals from trial court orders suppressing evidence, and ballot title appeals. The court hears oral arguments in most of the cases it decides. Arguments are scheduled two or three days each September through June with approximately four to eight cases heard in each session. Unlike the court of appeals, which hears and decides cases in panels of three, all seven Supreme Court justices decide each case unless a justice is disqualified in a particular case. The Supreme Court writes between 75 to 100 opinions per year. Three-fifths are civil cases and two- fifths are criminal. The civil cases are varied and may include any type of case tried in the state courts. Many are matters of first impression which involve issues not previously decided in Colorado. In addition to work directly connected with deciding cases, each justice participates in two or three committees which address particular matters related to the court system or the administration of the Judicial Branch.
  • Colorado Political Climate Survey Topline Election Report

    Colorado Political Climate Survey Topline Election Report

    Colorado Political Climate Survey Topline Election Report October 2018 Carey E. Stapleton E. Scott Adler Anand E. Sokhey Survey Lead Director Associate Director About the Study: American Politics Research Lab The American Politics Research Lab (APRL) is housed in the Department of Political Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. APRL is a non-partisan academic unit that supports basic research, educational activities, and public engagement on issues related to American politics. Lab faculty, student fellows, and affiliates pursue scholarly activities over a broad range of topics, utilizing a wide variety of research methodologies and analysis. Current lab projects include research on political behavior, state and local politics, and political agendas and recurring legislation in the U.S. Congress. The Lab is also home to the annual Colorado Political Climate Survey. APRL hosts a seminar series that includes talks by lab associates as well as distinguished scholars doing work related to the study of American politics. Colorado Political Climate Survey In October 2018, the American Politics Research Lab (APRL) conducted the third annual Colorado Political Climate (CPC) survey. The CPC is a survey of the political and policy attitudes of Coloradans. The study is designed to gauge the public’s political and partisan leanings, their opinions on a number of key issues facing the state, their attitudes toward major statewide and national political figures, and the outlook for the 2018 election. Methodology The sample is representative of registered voters in Colorado. It consists of 800 individual responses and has an overall margin of error of +/- 3.5%. The margin of error for subgroups is larger due to smaller sample sizes.
  • December 7-8, 2017 Hilton Denver Inverness Hotel • Englewood #HIHC17 Hotel Map

    December 7-8, 2017 Hilton Denver Inverness Hotel • Englewood #HIHC17 Hotel Map

    Informing Policy. Advancing Health Leading Through the Divide December 7-8, 2017 Hilton Denver Inverness Hotel • Englewood #HIHC17 Hotel Map WiFi Instructions Locate and connect to the network named Hilton Denver Inverness. You should be taken to a login page in your browser. Scroll down past sign-in and click on the Guest WiFi Connect button, then click “I have a promotional code.” Enter the code hotissues2017. Happy surfing! Livestreaming We will be livestreaming portions of the conference for those who are unable to join us in person. Interested viewers may find the video stream on CHI’s website, coloradohealthinstitute.org. Welcome to Hot Issues in Health. We have heard a lot this year about all that Gold Sponsors, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue divides us – politics, race, gender, income and Shield and the Colorado Hospital Association; geography. our Silver Sponsor, UnitedHealthcare; and our Bronze Sponsor, COPIC. The health world is coping with divides as well. Despite much progress over the past decade, We are grateful to the elected officials joining health outcomes and access to care still us at this forum, including state legislators, depend a great deal on a person’s social and county commissioners, city council members economic circumstances. And every day we and candidates for important positions deal with gaps between the public and private throughout our state. Your presence sends a sectors, the rapid pace of technology and the strong message about your commitment to slow, deliberate speed of public policy. health in Colorado. This year’s Hot Issues in Health conference My colleagues at the Colorado Health Institute confronts these divides and seeks to bridge have been working for months to bring you the gaps.
  • Election Summary Report General Election Montrose County November 06, 2018 Summary For: All Contests, All Districts, All Tabulators, All Counting Groups OFFICIAL

    Election Summary Report General Election Montrose County November 06, 2018 Summary For: All Contests, All Districts, All Tabulators, All Counting Groups OFFICIAL

    Page: 1 of 10 11/26/2018 2:03:37 PM Election Summary Report General Election Montrose County November 06, 2018 Summary for: All Contests, All Districts, All Tabulators, All Counting Groups OFFICIAL Ballots Cast: 19,314 Representative to the 116th United States Congress - District 3 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total Scott R. Tipton REP 12,767 Diane Mitsch Bush DEM 5,388 Gaylon Kent LBR 299 Mary M. Malarsie IND 575 Total Votes 19,029 Total Richard Tetu WRITE-IN 0 Bruce Lohmiller WRITE-IN 0 Gary Swing WRITE-IN 0 Unresolved Write-In 0 Governor / Lieutenant Governor (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total Jared Polis / Dianne DEM 5,855 Primavera Walker Stapleton / Lang Sias REP 12,466 Bill Hammons / Eric UNI 171 Bodenstab Scott Helker / Michele LBR 445 Poague Total Votes 18,937 Total Unresolved Write-In 0 Page: 2 of 10 11/26/2018 2:03:37 PM Secretary of State (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total Wayne Williams REP 12,686 Jena Griswold DEM 5,489 Amanda Campbell ACN 466 Blake Huber APV 84 Total Votes 18,725 Total Unresolved Write-In 0 State Treasurer (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total Brian Watson REP 12,713 Dave Young DEM 5,342 Gerald F. Kilpatrick ACN 584 Total Votes 18,639 Total Unresolved Write-In 0 Attorney General (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total Phil Weiser DEM 5,339 George Brauchler REP 12,866 William F. Robinson III LBR 522 Total Votes 18,727 Total Unresolved Write-In 0 Regent of the University of Colorado - At Large (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Total Lesley Smith DEM 5,304 Ken Montera REP 11,866 Christopher E.