Stephen Dixon.Pdf (11.27Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stephen Dixon.Pdf (11.27Mb) ABSTRACT Archaeological and Anthropological Aspects of the Holocaust from a Jewish Perspective by Stephen Dixon B.Sc. The intention of this research is to offer innovative ideas on methods that can be utilised by academics and historians within a conflict context. The framework that will support the overall research is from that of an archaeological, anthropological and memory driven perspective. Discussion will turn to individual components such as liminality, monumentality, the built environment and landscape theory highlighting Nazi segregation policies. Analysis of ghettoisation, deportation and extermination policy through archaeological sub-disciplines and anthropology as well as comparison to other world atrocity sites will take place. This will illustrate that detection of similar techniques of incarceration are recognisable as modes of controlling fear whilst simultaneously achieving a terror regime. Initially propaganda policy of the National Socialist Party in both pre and World War II settings in Germany and throughout parts of Europe helped to fuel the already present culture of antisemitism. A significant and sinister shift in decision-making witnessed a move from persecution to exclusion and isolation that saw major cities already damaged by invasion and warfare ‘holding’ Jews in purposefully manufactured locations that was a preparatory step towards genocide. Ghettoisation facilitated the next stage in the process, deportation by train to extermination centres, as communities were despatched from ‘round-up’ points to ‘unknown destinations’ further east. At all times Jews were vulnerable and were placed into landscapes of terror, although either the strong individual or Nazi methods of control, at times, suppressed fear. Arrival at industrialised death camps was the final stage of a journey for the majority that culminated in death, but not before further measures that reduced the individual to a state beyond life, a liminal entity in a place where extreme conditions prevailed. Each component of the strategy was monitored and managed, as fear was euphemistically dismissed by the perpetrator and the by-stander. i Acknowledgements This author would like to thank supervisor Chris Read, Institute of Technology, Sligo (I.T.Sligo) for his assistance and encouragement throughout the last two years. Also I.T. Sligo for allowing me the opportunity to further advance research and knowledge on a subject that was initiated as part of an under-graduate degree in Applied Archaeology in 2010. In addition I would like to thank examiners Dr. Marion Dowd (I.T.Sligo) and Dr. Caroline Sturdy-Colls (Staffordshire University) for their direction and encouragement. It is necessary to mention the authors of the publications that have been utilised for reference material. This includes academics and historians who have written at length on the subject of The Holocaust, and to those who publish ‘websites’ and ‘blogspots’ that have further enhanced and embellished information that is available. Finally I would like to thank my family who have continued to support me throughout my return to studies in recent years. ii Declaration I declare that I am the sole author of this thesis and that all the work presented in it, unless otherwise referenced, is my own. I also declare that this work has not been submitted, in whole or in part, to any other University or College for any degree or qualification. Stephen Dixon (Author) Chris Read (Supervisor) (August 2013) iii Contents...................................................................................v List of Figures.........................................................................viii List of Plates............................................................................ix Hypothesis Statement.............................................................xi Glossary..................................................................................xii iv Contents 1 Introduction...........................................................................................................1 2 Literature Review..................................................................................................8 2.1 Archaeology; Holocaust and Conflict................................................................9 2.2 Anthropology; Social Memory.........................................................................17 2.3 Propaganda...................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Ghettoisation................................................................................................... 24 2.5 Built Environment.......................................................................................... 27 2.6 Monumentality................................................................................................ 29 2.7 Liminality (incorporating Deportation)............................................................32 2.8 Landscapes........ ............................................................................................. 35 3 Methodology...................................................................................................... 38 3.1 Definitions........................................................................................................39 4 Genocide...............................................................................................................46 4.1 Introduction....................................................................................................46 4.2 The Soviet Gulag............................................................................................50 4.3 Cambodia, Pol Pot and The Khmer Rouge....................................................52 4.4 The Bosnian War-Srebrenica.........................................................................56 4.5 Visible Components of Genocide................................................................. 58 5 Deception, Fear and Terror-An Introduction..................................................64 5.1 Managing the threat of death; Terror Management Theory..........................64 5.2 Fear based analyses of Nazi Germany..........................................................65 5.3 Holocaust survivors and Genocide remembered...........................................67 5.4 Victim, perpetrator and bystander.................................................................68 5.5 Consequences................................................................................................69 6 Propaganda-The Art of Deception.....................................................................71 6.1 Definition.........................................................................................................71 6.2 National Socialism and Propaganda.............................................................. .71 6.3 Propaganda and Anti-Semitism......................................................................76 6.4 Propaganda in Action-Theresienstadt............................................................78 6.4.1 Warsaw Ghetto.............................................................................................80 7 Ghettoisation.........................................................................................................82 7.1 Aspects of the Initiation of Ghettoisation ........................................................82 v 7.2 Ghettoisation and German Jews.......................................................................88 7.3 Ghettos; Exclusion and Isolation......................................................................89 7.4 Ghettos of Budapest, Łódź, andWarsaw................................................ ….....90 8 Deportation..........................................................................................................95 8.1 Part of the Process..........................................................................................97 9 Internment and Extermination........................................................................102 9.1 The Process................................................................................................. 102 9.2 Internment and Extermination Locations.....................................................105 9.2.1 Chełmno....................................................................................................105 9.2.2 Bełżec........................................................................................................107 9.2.3 Sobibór..................................................................................................... 109 9.2.4 Treblinka...................................................................................................110 9.2.5 Majdanek...................................................................................................113 9.2.6 Auschwitz-Birkenau..................................................................................115 10 Liminality.......................................................................................................118 10.1 Liminality; The Yellow Star and Ghosts.................................................118 10.2 Liminality and Ghettoisation...................................................................121 10.3 Liminality and Deportation.....................................................................124 10.4 Internment, Extermination and Liminality..............................................129
Recommended publications
  • Holocaust Archaeology: Archaeological Approaches to Landscapes of Nazi Genocide and Persecution
    HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY: ARCHAEOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO LANDSCAPES OF NAZI GENOCIDE AND PERSECUTION BY CAROLINE STURDY COLLS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The landscapes and material remains of the Holocaust survive in various forms as physical reminders of the suffering and persecution of this period in European history. However, whilst clearly defined historical narratives exist, many of the archaeological remnants of these sites remain ill-defined, unrecorded and even, in some cases, unlocated. Such a situation has arisen as a result of a number of political, social, ethical and religious factors which, coupled with the scale of the crimes, has often inhibited systematic search. This thesis will outline how a non- invasive archaeological methodology has been implemented at two case study sites, with such issues at its core, thus allowing them to be addressed in terms of their scientific and historical value, whilst acknowledging their commemorative and religious significance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of National Socialist Visual Culture: Iconoclasm, Censorship, and Preservation in Germany, 1945–2020
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Fall 1-5-2021 The Fate of National Socialist Visual Culture: Iconoclasm, Censorship, and Preservation in Germany, 1945–2020 Denali Elizabeth Kemper CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/661 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Fate of National Socialist Visual Culture: Iconoclasm, Censorship, and Preservation in Germany, 1945–2020 By Denali Elizabeth Kemper Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History, Hunter College The City University of New York 2020 Thesis sponsor: January 5, 2021____ Emily Braun_________________________ Date Signature January 5, 2021____ Joachim Pissarro______________________ Date Signature Table of Contents Acronyms i List of Illustrations ii Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Points of Reckoning 14 Chapter 2: The Generational Shift 41 Chapter 3: The Return of the Repressed 63 Chapter 4: The Power of Nazi Images 74 Bibliography 93 Illustrations 101 i Acronyms CCP = Central Collecting Points FRG = Federal Republic of Germany, West Germany GDK = Grosse Deutsche Kunstaustellung (Great German Art Exhibitions) GDR = German Democratic Republic, East Germany HDK = Haus der Deutschen Kunst (House of German Art) MFAA = Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives Program NSDAP = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Worker’s or Nazi Party) SS = Schutzstaffel, a former paramilitary organization in Nazi Germany ii List of Illustrations Figure 1: Anonymous photographer.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Students Know and Understand About the Holocaust? Evidence from English Secondary Schools
    CENTRE FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Stuart Foster, Alice Pettigrew, Andy Pearce, Rebecca Hale Centre for Holocaust Education Centre Adrian Burgess, Paul Salmons, Ruth-Anne Lenga Centre for Holocaust Education What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Cover image: Photo by Olivia Hemingway, 2014 What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Stuart Foster Alice Pettigrew Andy Pearce Rebecca Hale Adrian Burgess Paul Salmons Ruth-Anne Lenga ISBN: 978-0-9933711-0-3 [email protected] British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A CIP record is available from the British Library All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permissions of the publisher. iii Contents About the UCL Centre for Holocaust Education iv Acknowledgements and authorship iv Glossary v Foreword by Sir Peter Bazalgette vi Foreword by Professor Yehuda Bauer viii Executive summary 1 Part I Introductions 5 1. Introduction 7 2. Methodology 23 Part II Conceptions and encounters 35 3. Collective conceptions of the Holocaust 37 4. Encountering representations of the Holocaust in classrooms and beyond 71 Part III Historical knowledge and understanding of the Holocaust 99 Preface 101 5. Who were the victims? 105 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust/Shoah the Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-Day Poland
    NOW AVAILABLE remembrance a n d s o l i d a r i t y Holocaust/Shoah The Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-day Poland in 20 th century european history Ways of Survival as Revealed in the Files EUROPEAN REMEMBRANCE of the Ghetto Courts and Police in Lithuania – LECTURES, DISCUSSIONS, remembrance COMMENTARIES, 2012–16 and solidarity in 20 th This publication features the century most significant texts from the european annual European Remembrance history Symposium (2012–16) – one of the main events organized by the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity in Gdańsk, Berlin, Prague, Vienna and Budapest. The 2017 issue symposium entitled ‘Violence in number the 20th-century European history: educating, commemorating, 5 – december documenting’ will take place in Brussels. Lectures presented there will be included in the next Studies issue. 2016 Read Remembrance and Solidarity Studies online: enrs.eu/studies number 5 www.enrs.eu ISSUE NUMBER 5 DECEMBER 2016 REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY EDITED BY Dan Michman and Matthias Weber EDITORIAL BOARD ISSUE EDITORS: Prof. Dan Michman Prof. Matthias Weber EDITORS: Dr Florin Abraham, Romania Dr Árpád Hornják, Hungary Dr Pavol Jakubčin, Slovakia Prof. Padraic Kenney, USA Dr Réka Földváryné Kiss, Hungary Dr Ondrej Krajňák, Slovakia Prof. Róbert Letz, Slovakia Prof. Jan Rydel, Poland Prof. Martin Schulze Wessel, Germany EDITORIAL COORDINATOR: Ewelina Pękała REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY PUBLISHER: European Network Remembrance and Solidarity ul. Wiejska 17/3, 00–480 Warszawa, Poland www.enrs.eu, [email protected] COPY-EDITING AND PROOFREADING: Caroline Brooke Johnson PROOFREADING: Ramon Shindler TYPESETTING: Marcin Kiedio GRAPHIC DESIGN: Katarzyna Erbel COVER DESIGN: © European Network Remembrance and Solidarity 2016 All rights reserved ISSN: 2084–3518 Circulation: 500 copies Funded by the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media upon a Decision of the German Bundestag.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Survival in Budapest, March 1944 – February 1945
    DECISIONS AMID CHAOS: JEWISH SURVIVAL IN BUDAPEST, MARCH 1944 – FEBRUARY 1945 Allison Somogyi A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2014 Approved by: Christopher Browning Chad Bryant Konrad Jarausch © 2014 Allison Somogyi ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Allison Somogyi: Decisions amid Chaos: Jewish Survival in Budapest, March 1944 – February 1945 (Under the direction of Chad Bryant) “The Jews of Budapest are completely apathetic and do virtually nothing to save themselves,” Raoul Wallenberg stated bluntly in a dispatch written in July 1944. This simply was not the case. In fact, Jewish survival in World War II Budapest is a story of agency. A combination of knowledge, flexibility, and leverage, facilitated by the chaotic violence that characterized Budapest under Nazi occupation, helped to create an atmosphere in which survival tactics were common and widespread. This unique opportunity for agency helps to explain why approximately 58 percent of Budapest’s 200,000 Jews survived the war while the total survival rate for Hungarian Jews was only 26 percent. Although unique, the experience of Jews within Budapest’s city limits is not atypical and suggests that, when fortuitous circumstances provided opportunities for resistance, European Jews made informed decisions and employed everyday survival tactics that often made the difference between life and death. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank everybody who helped me and supported me while writing and researching this thesis. First and foremost I must acknowledge the immense support, guidance, advice, and feedback given to me by my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statements
    Opening Statements Opening Ceremony Remarks at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Mr. Miles Lerman CHAIRMAN, UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL COUNCIL UNITED STATES It is proper and most fitting that this conference began with a symbolic ceremony of silent contemplation in the Hall of Remembrance of the Holocaust Memorial Museum where we invoked memory and paid tribute to those who were consumed in the Nazi inferno. Now let me welcome you to the Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum is pleased to co-chair with the State Department this historic event. For the next three days representatives of 44 countries will have the opportunity to explore a just and orderly return of confiscated assets to their rightful owners. It took over 50 years for the world to come to grips with the fact that the biggest murder of the century; it was also, as my friend Ben Meed reminds us, the biggest robbery in history. This fact is not limited to one country only. What really shocked the conscience of the world was the discovery that even after the war, some countries tried to gain materially from this cataclysm by refusing to return to the rightful owners what was justly theirs. The refusal to respond to these rightful claims was a great injustice, a moral wrong which can not be ignored. And this is what brings us together today. We are here to make sure that these wrongs are corrected in a just and proper manner. 4 WASHINGTON CONFERENCE ON HOLOCAUST-ERA ASSETS Under Secretary Eizenstat and Edgar Bronfman deserve our gratitude for their unrelenting efforts to bring about full accountability for all wrongs that must be made right.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Journeys:Parallel Teacher’S Guide
    Teacher’s Parallel Journeys: The Holocaust through the Eyes of Teens Guide GRADES 9 -12 Phone: 470 . 578 . 2083 historymuseum.kennesaw.edu Parallel Journeys: The Holocaust through the Eyes of Teens Teacher’s Guide Teacher’s Table of Contents About this Teacher’s Guide.............................................................................................................. 3 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Georgia Standards of Excellence Correlated with These Activities ...................................... 5 Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust .......................................................................... 12 CORE LESSON Understanding the Holocaust: “Tightening the Noose” – All Grades | 5th – 12th ............................ 15 5th Grade Activities 1. Individual Experiences of the Holocaust .......................................................................... 18 2. Propaganda and Dr. Seuss .................................................................................................. 20 3. Spiritual Resistance and the Butterfly Project .................................................................. 22 4. Responding to the St. Louis ............................................................................................... 24 5. Mapping the War and the Holocaust ................................................................................. 25 6th, 7th, and 8th Grade Activities
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    Cultural Policy and Political Oppression: Nazi Architecture and the Development of SS Forced Labor Concentration Camps* Paul B. Jaskot Beyond its use as propaganda, art was thoroughly integrated into the implementation of Nazi state and party policies. Because artistic and political goals were integrated, art was not only subject to repressive policies but also in turn influenced the formulation of those very repressive measures. In the Third Reich, art policy was increasingly authoritarian in character; however, art production also became one means by which other authoritarian institutions could develop their ability to oppress. The Problem We can analyze the particular political function of art by looking at the interest of the SS in orienting its forced labor operations to the monumental building economy. The SS control of forced labor concentration camps after 1936 linked state architectural policy to the political function of incarcerating and punishing perceived enemies of National Socialist Germany.1 The specific example of the Nuremberg Reich Party Rally Grounds reveals three key aspects of this SS process of adaptation. The first aspect is the relationship between architectural decisions at Nuremberg and developments in the German building economy during the early war years. Before the turning tide of the war led to a cessation of work at the site, agencies and firms involved with the design and construction of the Nuremberg buildings secured a steady and profitable supply of work as a result of Hitler’s emphasis on a few large architectural projects. The second aspect focuses on how the SS quarrying enterprises in the forced labor concentration camps were comparable to their private-sector competitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance in the Ghettos
    Say 76 Resistance in the Ghettos Tim Say While some scholars like Raul Hilberg have argued that there was little resistance from Jews during the Holocaust, the large amount of evidence available has demonstrated that this is false, and that Jews resisted in many different ways. Specifically in the ghettos throughout Europe, resistance took many different forms which can be categorized as either active or passive resistance. The most well-known examples of resistance are the various uprisings, such as in the Warsaw ghetto, though it also includes other active forms such as raids to attack German supply lines or train stations. Active resistance was not common throughout the ghettos, however, as it created controversy because of the very real threat of reprisals from the Germans, who had no compunction about killing dozens of Jews in retaliation for one German death. This threat divided many ghettos about whether or not active resistance was the appropriate action to take. The concept of passive resistance was perhaps more important, as it was much more prevalent throughout the ghettos and affected the everyday lives of the majority of the inhabitants. It included life giving examples such as the smuggling of food, as well as more psychological examples such as religious education, or cultural activities like music and theatre. These types of examples are especially important because they specifically address the German strategy of demoralizing the inhabitants of the ghettos. Additionally, they serve to demonstrate that resistance was not only common throughout the ghettos, but was integral in maintaining the health and identity of the Jewish community in the face of the desperate circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Behavior During the Holocaust
    VICTIMS’ POLITICS: JEWISH BEHAVIOR DURING THE HOLOCAUST by Evgeny Finkel A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON 2012 Date of final oral examination: 07/12/12 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Yoshiko M. Herrera, Associate Professor, Political Science Scott G. Gehlbach, Professor, Political Science Andrew Kydd, Associate Professor, Political Science Nadav G. Shelef, Assistant Professor, Political Science Scott Straus, Professor, International Studies © Copyright by Evgeny Finkel 2012 All Rights Reserved i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation could not have been written without the encouragement, support and help of many people to whom I am grateful and feel intellectually, personally, and emotionally indebted. Throughout the whole period of my graduate studies Yoshiko Herrera has been the advisor most comparativists can only dream of. Her endless enthusiasm for this project, razor- sharp comments, constant encouragement to think broadly, theoretically, and not to fear uncharted grounds were exactly what I needed. Nadav Shelef has been extremely generous with his time, support, advice, and encouragement since my first day in graduate school. I always knew that a couple of hours after I sent him a chapter, there would be a detailed, careful, thoughtful, constructive, and critical (when needed) reaction to it waiting in my inbox. This awareness has made the process of writing a dissertation much less frustrating then it could have been. In the future, if I am able to do for my students even a half of what Nadav has done for me, I will consider myself an excellent teacher and mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • Grace in Auschwitz: a Glimpse of Light in Utter Darkness
    Grace in Auschwitz: A Glimpse of Light in Utter Darkness By Jean-Pierre Fortin A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Theology of the University of St. Michael‟s College and the Department of Theology of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology Awarded by the University of St. Michael‟s College © Copyright by Jean-Pierre Fortin 2014 Grace in Auschwitz: A Glimpse of Light in Utter Darkness Jean-Pierre Fortin Doctor of Philosophy in Theology University of St. Michael‟s College 2014 Abstract Since the postmodern human condition and relationship to God were forged directly in the crucible of or in response to Auschwitz (the Shoah), the Christian theology of grace cannot elude the challenge of radical evil it paradigmatically embodies and symbolizes. The present dissertation attempts to provide a theology of grace that would enable twenty-first century postmoderns to meaningfully relate to the Christian tradition. A theological interface accomplishing the transposition of the theology and categories of the traditional account of grace into ones accessible to twenty-first century westerners is therefore constructed. By means of the study of landmark literary, philosophical and theological works on Auschwitz produced by individuals who directly suffered it, an attempt at monitoring the human (and ultimately postmodern) condition, experience and evolution (in themselves and in relation to the transcendent) through time from before, through the event and up to the experience of renewed freedom is made. This is followed by the consideration of the reality of grace as it has been experienced, reflected upon and understood by western Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannah Arendt Und Die Frankfurter Schule
    Einsicht 03 Bulletin des Fritz Bauer Instituts Hannah Arendt Fritz Bauer Institut und die Frankfurter Schule Geschichte und MMitit BeiträgenBeiträgen vonvon LLilianeiliane WWeissberg,eissberg, Wirkung des Holocaust MMonikaonika BBolloll uundnd Ann-KathrinAnn-Kathrin PollmannPollmann Editorial haben wir uns in einer Ringvorlesung den zentralen Exponenten die- ser Auseinandersetzung zugewandt: Peter Szondi, Karl Löwith, Jacob Taubes, Ernst Bloch und anderen. Unsere Gastprofessorin, Prof. Dr. Liliane Weissberg, hat in einem Seminar Hannah Arendts umstrittene These von der »Banalität des Bösen« neu beleuchtet, während das Jüdische Museum sich mit den Rückkehrern der »Frankfurter Schu- le« (Horkheimer, Adorno, Pollock u.a.) beschäftigte. Im Rahmen ei- ner internationalen Tagung führte Liliane Weissberg die beiden The- men »Hannah Arendt« und »Frankfurter Schule« zusammen. Zwei der dort gehaltenen Vorträge drucken wir in diesem Heft ab. Sie werden ergänzt durch einen Artikel zu Günther Anders, dessen Überlegungen zu »Auschwitz« und »Hiroshima« einen deutlich anderen Denkansatz in dieser deutsch-jüdischen Nachkriegsgeschichte darstellen. Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, Die vom Fritz Bauer Institut gemeinsam mit dem Jüdischen Mu- seum Frankfurt, dem Deutschen Filminstitut – DIF und CineGraph die Herbstausgabe unseres Bulletins, – Hamburgisches Centrum für Filmforschung e.V. organisierte Jah- Einsicht 02, war dem Prozess gegen John restagung der Arbeitsgruppe »Cinematographie des Holocaust« fand Demjanjuk gewidmet. Die Gerichts- dieses Jahr im Jüdischen Museum statt und hatte Benjamin Murmel- verhandlung in München hat erst nach stein (1905–1989) zum Thema. Der Rabbiner, Althistoriker, Gelehr- dem Erscheinen unseres Heftes begon- te und umstrittene letzte »Judenälteste« von Theresienstadt gewährte nen, sodass wir uns darin vor allem auf Claude Lanzmann 1975 in Rom – zur Vorbereitung seines Shoah- die Vorgänge, die zum Schwurgerichts- Films – ein 11-stündiges Interview.
    [Show full text]