DOCSLIB.ORG

Neuroethics Event Calendar Members Are Encouraged to Submit Event Listings for Consideration to [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neuroethics Event Calendar Members Are Encouraged to Submit Event Listings for Consideration to Info@Neuroethicssociety.Org Neuroethics Society www.neuroethicssociety.org — Volume 2, Number 3 May, 2008 Writing Prize in Neuroethics: Winners Announced Megan Kaufman, NS Assistant Administrator The Neuroethics Society is nal’s sixth bi-annual issue is centered Geneva University Medical School, proud to announce the winners of the around neuroethics with the NS publiciz- Heather Knapp of the University of Neuroethics Prize in Writing, jointly ing the call for papers and helping to se- Washington, Mike Kuhar of Emory Uni- sponsored by the Society and the edito- lect winners for the writing contest. Bo rial board of the Penn Bioethics Journal Peng described the nature of the collabo- Continued on page 2 (PBJ). Awards went to the top three ration: “We often have themed issues for neuroethics-themed articles submitted by the journal such as public health, organ undergraduates to PBJ, the nation’s pre- transplantation, and international bio- miere undergraduate bioethics journal, ethics, so with the growing nature of neu- published and edited by students at the roethics, it was very appropriate to cre- University of Pennsylvania. The editorial ate this issue. We received a number of board at the Journal initially reviewed all neuroethics and other bioethics papers the submitted articles and nominated from undergrads at ten different schools three outstanding pieces for review by a and ran them through our normal review committee of Neuroethics Society mem- process with the editorial board. We bers. The committee selected the winner were left with 3 papers to be judged for and two runners up, each receiving a the writing prizes.” prize for their work. The winning papers A committee of eight NS mem- can be found online at bers reviewed the three nominated pa- www.bioethicsjournal.com. pers and selected the winner and runners The collaboration began with a up based upon the strength of each piece. meeting between the editor in chief of The committee included Tom Buller of PBJ, University of Pennsylvania junior Bo the University of Alaska, Daofen Chen of Peng, and NS Communication and Mem- the National Institute of Neurological bership Chair, Martha Farah. The Jour- Disease and Stroke, Samia Hurst of the MacArthur Program in Law and Neuroscience Established Megan Kaufman, NS Assistant Administrator Ten million dollars is being put instead of “more accurate predictions, Project include developing a primer for toward neuroethics in a new grant more effective interventions, and less judges on using new research findings and through the Law and Neuroscience Pro- bias.” The Project answers the call by the creation of a textbook for law ject. The Project brings together the lead- supporting joint research between scien- schools. The Project also features a series ers of two diverse fields to promote con- tists and legal scholars. of articles relevant to its work on their versation between neuroscience and law. The project is directed by Neu- website. The Project was inaugurated in October roethics Society members Michael S. Gaz- More information on the Project 2007 and is funded by the John D. and zaniga and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and is available on the website at Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation organized into three research networks: www.lawandneuroscienceproject.org. through a three-year grant to the Univer- Differing Brains, Addiction and Antisocial Public events pertaining to neuroethics sity of California at Santa Barbara. Ac- Behavior, and Decision-making. Each net- will be publicized on the NS event calen- cording to the Foundation, the explosive work will convene at least three times a dar as well as in the newsletter. The crea- growth of scientific knowledge in the past year to discuss the gaps in knowledge tion of the Law and Neuroscience Project decade necessitates reform in the judicial requiring further research and propose is a landmark in the development of neu- system. Without careful consideration on recommendations for judicial and ethical roethics and draws public attention to both sides, misuse of technology could reform. Year two of the Project involves the field. lead to false convictions and skepticism funding for research. Other goals of the Page 2 Continued: Writing Prize Winners Announced versity, Jim Olds of George Mason Uni- the challenging questions that it strives ginia, George Mason University, and the versity, Maarje Schermer of the Erasmus to answer, and the issues that we all University of Calgary. The journal is Academic Medical Center, and Kevin must think critically about.” After taking published twice-annually, with funding Wilson of Gettysburg College. a year off, she hopes to apply to gradu- and support from the Student Activities Courtney Beoff of the College ate school. Council, the Center for Undergraduate of Saint Catherine won top honors for Runners-up include Sheheryar Research and Fellowships, and the Cen- her work entitled “The ethical consid- Kabraji, Edmund Naylor, and Daniel ter for Bioethics, all of the University of erations of nootropic drugs: memory Wood’s article entitled “Reading minds? Pennsylvania. The editorial board is boom or drug bust?”. The article, based Ethical implications of recent advances in open to Penn undergraduates, and in- upon her honors thesis, highlights the neuroimaging” and Janitza Montalvo- cludes 30 students advised by Penn fac- similarity in ethical concerns between Ortiz’s article entitled “Should f-MRI lie- ulty members Jonathan Moreno, Connie steroid and nootropic drug use in nor- detection technology be admitted in Ulrich and Dr. Paul Wolpe. mal populations. It also calls for further courtrooms?” The first article, written While each issue of PBJ includes research into the long term effects of by Oxford Medical School students, dis- papers based on a selected theme, sub- nootopic drugs, which are currently be- cusses the ethical implications of the use missions are always open to all topics ing used as a treatment method for pa- of functional magnetic resonance imaging and undergraduate authors. NS mem- tients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease, (fMRI) to determine levels of conscious- bers are encouraged to advise their stu- because “otherwise, the memory net- ness in comatose patients. The later arti- dents to submit papers (including neuro- works that define individuals and enable cle “intends to assess some of the argu- ethics-focused) to future issues. More people to remember good and bad ex- ments that raise many ethical, civil and information can be found on the website. periences will be at risk.” Beoff is a sen- social concerns about the unregulated “The neuroethics writing contest and ior majoring in biology with a minor in incorporation of the fMRI technology as collaboration with NS exemplifies the chemistry. Her interest in neuroethics a lie-detector device that can threaten savvy and progressive mindset of the was sparked by her four years spent the credibility of the science in our soci- Penn Bioethics Journal,” according to the working in the lab of neuroscientist Dr. ety.” executive editor Bo Peng. The successful Apostolos Georgopoulos and her liberal The three wining articles are union with the Neuroethics Society for arts education. Beoff says “Neuroethics published in volume IV, issue ii of PBJ, this writing contest strengthened the fascinates me because it involves an which includes seven articles from stu- bond between the professional and aca- overlap between the ever-changing and dents at Oxford Medical School, the demic world of neuroethics and further developing field of neuroscience that College of Saint Catherine, the Univer- fueled the interest of nascent scientists captivates my interest and ethics, a field sity of Puerto Rico, the University of in the field. which I have been drawn to because of Western Ontario, the University of Vir- NS Welcomes Assistant Administrator Megan Kaufman NS welcomes its newest member to the staff. Megan Kauffman is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania majoring in Biological Basis of Behavior. She became in- terested in neuroethics after reading several neuroethics-related papers for her high school psychology class and watching ethical issues arise in the clinical sphere while working at a local hospital. Since arriving at Penn she has been helping to or- ganize monthly neuroethics talks at the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and working as a research assistant for Martha Farah. Kauffman says, “Neuroethics al- lows me to examine the brain quantitatively in order to draw qualitative conclu- sions. Very few other areas allow me to tie my interests in the microscopic and macroscopic dimensions so seamlessly.” She will be writing for the newsletter and managing the website. Her first contribution to the newsletter is the cover stories, on the neuroethics writing prize and MacArthur Law and Neuroscience Project. Volume 2, Number 3 Page 3 Meeting Round-up Potomac Institute Workshop On April 18, 2008, the Center for Neurotechnology Studies (CNS) of the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies (PIPS) organized a workshop on “Developing Ethical Guidelines for Research and Use of Neurotechnologies”. The workshop was hosted by CNS Director, Dr. Dennis McBride and attended by an eclectic mixture of experts from academe, industry, legal, defense and governmental sectors. Dr. Evan DeRenzo, Adjunct Fellow at Potomac Institute, moderated the day-long proceedings that included presentations in the morning, highlighting the current state and future direction of neurotechnologies. The afternoon was a brainstorming session to prioritize ethical, legal, social implications (ELSI) surrounding a particular neurotechnology. The goal was to reach at consensus regarding terminology, and develop methodology to evaluate neurotechnologies’ ELSI issues. The workshop concluded by laying forth both short- and long-term steps to continue the dialogue and advance sound public discourse in the neuroethics of neurotechnologies. For a beginner like me, the workshop provided a revealing, exciting and challenging opportunity to further explore the emerging field of neurotechnology and neuroethics. Vid Nukala, PhD (Neurobiology), is a Research Intern at the Center for Neurotechnology Studies (CNS) of the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Explanation of Conflict of Interest Disclosure Parts: Part One: All
    Explanation of Conflict of Interest Disclosure Parts: Part One: All Financial Involvement with a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company, a company providing clinical assessment, scientific, or medical companies doing business with or proposing to do business with ACNP over past 2 years (Jan. 2011-Present) Part Two: Income Sources & Equity of $10,000 or greater Part Three: Financial Involvement with a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company, a company providing clinical assessment, scientific, or medical products or companies doing business with or proposing to do business with ACNP which constitutes more than 5% of personal income (Jan. 2011-Present): Part Four: Grants from pharmaceutical or biotechnology company, a company providing clinical assessment, scientific, or medical products directly, or indirectly through a foundation, university, or any other organization (Jan. 2011-Present) Part Five: My primary employer is a pharmaceutical/biotech/medical device company. 2012 Program Committee Disclosures Anissa Abi-Dargham: Part 1: Pfizer; Otsuka; Takeda; Sunovion; Shire; Roche; Pierre Favre; Part 2: Pierre Favre William Carlezon: Part 1: Referring to 2010-2011: Scientific Advisory Board, Myneurolab.com; Consultant, Concert Pharmaceuticals; Consultant, Lantheus Medical Imaging; Consultant, Transcept Pharmaceuticals, (Spouse) Senior Scientist, EMD Serono; Part 2: (Spouse) Senior Scientist, EMD Serono, Part 3: (Spouse) Senior Scientist, EMD Serono Cameron Carter: Part1: GlaxoSmithKline research; Part 4: GlaxoSmithKline Karl Deisseroth: Part
    [Show full text]
  • IMH Colloquium Serie
    Interdisciplinary Colloquium Series for 2008 - 2009 Sponsored by the UBC INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH Sept. 10 Barbara Sahakian: Cognition in Depression and Mania WED. Professor of Clinical Neuropsychology, Dept. of Psychiatry and MR/Wellcome Trust Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge Co-sponsored by National Core for Neuroethics. 2nd talk on TH., Sept. 11, as part of its inaugural ceremonies. Oct. 2 Marten deVries: Minds, Media, & Early Education: Public Mental Health & Media Approaches for Children Under Difficult Conditions & Disaster Professor of Social Psychiatry and Head of Center for Public Mental Health, Maastricht University; Founder, International Inst. Psycho-social and Socio-ecological Research (IPSER) Co-sponsored by Div. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2nd talk Fri., Oct. 3, noon, at Children’s Hospital: the Dr. Hira Panikkar Memorial Lecture: Babies, Brains & Culture: Health & Development in the Context of Cultural Diversity; Cases from East Africa Nov. 6 Joseph Trimble: Infusing Psychology Courses with Diversity Content: Truths, Half-Truths, and Anecdotes in Cross-Cultural Psychology Professor, Center for Cross-Cultural Research, Dept. of Psychology; Director, Office of Institutional Assessment, Research, and Testing, Western Washington University Co-sponsored by the National Core for Neuroethics. 2nd talk Fri., Nov. 7, noon, Neuroethics Conference Room (Koerner S117): Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research with Ethnocultural Populations Dec. 11 Steven Marans: Childhood Trauma: Challenges to Listening and Responding Harris Prof. of Child Psychiatry & Prof. of Psychiatry, Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine and Director, National Center for Children Exposed to Violence Co-sponsored by Div. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2nd talk Fri., Dec. 11, noon, at Children’s Hospital: Hands on Problem-Solving in Listening and Responding to Traumatized Children Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review 2018
    Year in Review 2018 International Neuroethics Society Message from the President I was honored to become President of the International Neuroethics Society in November 2017 and to have a chance to build on the excellent work of my predecessors, Judy Illes, Barbara Sahakian, and Steve Hyman. I set out three goals for my two years as President: • To increase opportunities in the Society for INS members • To boost the public role of the INS in discussions, scholarly and public, of neuroethics and • To increase INS membership. I am pleased to report that we have increased the opportunities for members to take part in the Society’s activities with new committees and task forces. We have reached out to the public through, for example, our public event at the Annual Meeting on ‘My Brain Made Me Buy It? The Neuroethics of Advertising’ and our essay competition in which our members were invited to write for the lay reader. Building our membership, however, has been a little more challenging. Neuroethics is in some ways a niche field but with advances in brain research raising ever more social and ethical dilemmas, it is vital that scientists, philosophers and clinicians become involved. I am eager to get more regional INS meetings, giving opportunities for members to get together apart from the one annual meeting and to spread the word about neuroethics. We have made good progress here in 2018 with events in Oxford, UK; Milwaukee, USA; and Sydney, Australia. We have been developing new partnerships with other like-minded organizations and participating in conferences around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Networks of Expertise and Evidence for Public Policy Annual Report 2015 the Centre for Science and Policy in 2015
    Networks of Expertise and Evidence for Public Policy Annual Report 2015 The Centre for Science and Policy in 2015 The policy challenges facing our world today demand ever-greater foresight, ingenuity and a willingness to collaborate across sectors. As this report illustrates, “Over the seven years since its launch, the Centre for Science the Centre for Science and Policy has been helping its network to navigate and Policy has pioneered new ways of bringing academia and challenges from climate resilience to new forms of healthcare; from national government together to tackle policy challenges. CSaP has security to shaping innovation in the public interest. successfully promoted long-term thinking and more robust networks of expertise and evidence for public policy. The maturity of CSaP’s unique network of academics As he moves on to chair CSaP’s Advisory Council, I and policy makers is demonstrated by the breadth would like to express my gratitude to David for his Dr Robert Doubleday and depth of our work during 2015. Our network inspirational work in founding the Centre. Executive Director Centre for Science and Policy 2015 is the year in which the Centre came of age. Having now encompasses over 200 Fellows and more than served as its founding director from 2009 to 2015, I am 1100 researchers and, during the year, we welcomed In 2016, a year set to be every bit as challenging for delighted CSaP is playing a central role in supporting the more than 2500 participants to 43 events. governments as 2015 has been, CSaP’s role in brokering links between research and policy will be University’s mission, and that the Centre is in the excellent These achievements are testimony to the vision of more important than ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel and Study Groups
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2012) 38, S1–S78 & 2012 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology All rights reserved 0893-133X/12 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org S1 Monday, December 03, 2012 Conclusions: The signaling differences identified in this study have important implications in screening different KOR agonists and antago- nists having distinctly different ligand directed signaling properties. Mini Panel Disclosure: C. Chavkin, Part 1: Consulting for Trevena 2010-2011, 1. Renaissance in Opioid Biology: From Preclinical Concepts to Part 2: Contract with Trevena 2010-2011. Clinical Practice 1.2 The Place of Opiates in the Cortico-basal Ganglia Reward 1.1 Molecular Basis for Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonism: Circuit Implications of Ligand-directed Signaling for the Development of Novel Antidepressants Suzanne Haber* Charles Chavkin* University of Rochester, Rochester, New York University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Background: Reward is a central component for driving incentive- based learning, appropriate responses to stimuli, and habit Background: Preclinical studies have demonstrated the role of formation. Pathology in this circuit is associated with several stress-induced dynorphin release in mediating a component of the diseases including addition. The ventral medial prefrontal cortex anxiogenic and aversive effects of stress exposure. These results (vmPFC), orbital prefrontal cortex (OFC), dorsal anterior cingulate suggest that kappa opioid receptor (KOR) antagonists or low cortex (dACC), striatum, ventral pallidum, and midbrain dopamine efficacy partial agonists may promote stress-resilience in humans neurons are at the center of the circuit associated with reward in and may potentially be useful in treating certain forms of mood general and, in particular addiction. Connectivity between these disorders exacerbated by stressful experience. In rodent models, areas forms a complex neural network that mediates different stress-induced stimulation of dynorphin release produces aversion, aspects of reward processing, that can lead to habit formation.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2012 Newsletter
    Newsletter “To advance education and research in the science of psychopharmacology for the public benefit” June 2012 2012 SUMMER MEETING, SUNDAY 22 TO WEDNESDAY 25 JULY, HARROGATE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE Full details of sessions are on the website, together with registration facilities http://bap.org.uk/summermeetinghome.php?meetingID=5 Highlights: The 2012 Guest Lecture, presented by Dr Nora Volkow, Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Plenary Mental Health Session, “The best treatment for treatment-resistant patients with psychiatric disorders and possibilities for developing clinical research”, including presentations from Stephen Stahl, Guy Goodwin, Gavin Malloch and Kathryn Adcock 9 invited symposia covering cutting-edge clinical and non-clinical psychopharmacology: Drugs as tools in neuropsychiatry: Ketamine; New tricks for old drugs: Opiates, addiction and beyond; Advances in understanding brain corticosteroid responses to stress: relevance to depression; Cognitive impairment in depression: A target for treatment?; New treatment strategies for targeting drug addictions – A translational perspective; Functional imaging markers for monitoring treatment: Mechanisms and efficacy; Schizophrenia Treatment: What’s wrong with it and what might work better; Epigenetics and psychiatry - current understanding and therapeutic potential; Rethinking the compulsive aspects of addiction: From bench to bedside 2 dedicated Poster Sessions Post-doc Symposium, “Neurodevelopmental models of psychiatric disease: back to the future” Satellite
    [Show full text]
  • International Neuroethics Society
    Neuroethics Society www.neuroethicssociety.org — September, 2009 Call for Papers Foretell an Extended Neuroethics Literature Martha J. Farah, N.S. Newsletter Editor Over the summer we received two "Calls neuroethics, neuroaesthetics, the neuro- purview of neuroethics? What roles do for Papers," or CFPs, as they are known humanities, and neurohistory to name but print and digital media play in the devel- in the humanities world. We reprint a few. We are seeking essays for an ed- opment and distribution of this trend? them in their entirety here, because we ited collection that analyze and interro- Why and how do the humanities and the think they will be of interest to NS mem- gate this recent neuroscientific turn in the social sciences need the neurosciences? bers and because they make interesting humanities and social sciences. We are What can the neurosciences learn from reading in their own rights! particularly interested to hear from re- this trend in the humanities and the social searchers who apply the neuro- to their sciences? How might these fields combine NS members come mostly from back- own disciplinary work. into a discipline of their own? grounds in the natural and social sciences, Essays might engage with the following Related fields include: but if these CFPs are an indication, schol- questions: why has there been a shift to Neuroaesthetics ars in the humanities are also developing using neuroscience as an epistemological Social Neuroscience (neuro- an interest in neuroscience and its influ- framework and/or theoretical
    [Show full text]
  • The Young Univ Gallery the Martlet | Winter 2016
    THE YOUNG UNIV GALLERY WINTER 2016 | THE MARTLET Over the past months, the College has created a photographic record of almost 50 Old Members aged 35 or under called The Young Univ Gallery. The gallery highlights many of the important, unusual and impressive journeys taken by our young alumni. All of the portraits will be on display in College from March 2017. The project aims to inspire current and prospective students by showing the wide range of paths open to them on leaving College. All of the portraits will also be on display on a dedicated website, along with extensive biographies, interviews and a short fi lm about the project. We hope everyone will be inspired by The Young Univ Gallery. UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OXFORD ISSUE 6 SPRING 2017 THE YOUNG UNIV GALLERY CELEBRATING INSPIRATIONAL OLD MEMBERS UNDER 35 ALSO IN THIS ISSUE VETERAN JOURNALIST AND BROADCASTER RAJDEEP SARDESAI (1986) ISSUE 6 THE ASSASSIN IN THE COMPUTING ROOM: PRINCE YUSUPOV AND THE ‘MAD MONK’ SHOOTING THE PAST WITH ALEX VON TUNZELMANN (1996) FROM THE EDITOR University College Oxford OX1 4BH elcome to the Spring 2017 issue of The Martlet, the magazine for www.univ.ox.ac.uk members of University College Oxford. I would like to express my sincere thanks to those Old Members, students, Fellows, staff and www.facebook.com/universitycollegeoxford WFriends of the College who contributed to this issue. www.twitter.com/univoxford Enormous thanks also to Dr David Bell, Emeritus Fellow, and Justin Bowyer, Social Registered Charity no. 1141259 Media Manager, who provided copy-editing support for this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Finance: Investors, Corporations, and Markets
    $95.00 USA/$114.00 CAN (continued from front flap) KOLB SERIES IN FINANCE Behavioral Finance contains the latest information Essential Perspectives Nofsinger Baker from some of the leading practitioners and academics in this fi eld. Engaging and accessible, this book provides a clear understanding of how people make fi nancial BEHAVIORAL decisions and their effects on today’s markets. BEHAVIORAL FINANCE ehavioral fi nance has increasingly become part of mainstream fi nance—helping to H. KENT BAKER, PH D, CFA, CMA, is The Robert W. Kolb Series in Finance is an unparalleled source of informa- provide explanations for our economic University Professor of Finance and Kogod B FINANCE decisions by combining behavioral and cognitive tion dedicated to the most important issues in modern fi nance. Each book Research Professor at the Kogod School of focuses on a specifi c topic in the fi eld of fi nance and contains contributed psychological theory with conventional economics Business, American University. He has published chapters from both respected academics and experienced fi nancial profes- Investors, Corporations, and fi nance. extensively in leading academic and professional sionals. As part of the Robert W. Kolb Series in Finance, Behavioral Finance fi nance journals including the Journal of Finance, Filled with in-depth insights and practical advice, aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the key themes associated and Markets Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, this reliable resource—part of the Robert W. Kolb with this growing fi eld and how they can be applied to investments, corpora- FINANCE BEHAVIORAL Financial Management, Financial Analysts Journal, Series in Finance—provides a comprehensive view tions, markets, regulations, and education.
    [Show full text]
  • “CHILDREN” by Amelia Buttress a Dissertation
    THE CHEMICAL LIVES OF “CHILDREN” by Amelia Buttress A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland August 2014 ABSTRACT Stimulants and ADHD have become nearly synonymous in recent decades. The now common practice of prescribing stimulants to children has fueled the long-standing controversy surrounding the legitimacy of what is commonly known as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The need to medically justify stimulant use has sharpened the debate between those who argue for the disorder’s medical validity and those who describe the disorder as a social construction. Historical inquiry into ADHD has maintained this dichotomy, retroactively fusing psycho-stimulants and children, and reifiing rather than challenging a false choice between medical and constructivist explanations of the disorder. This dissertation reexamines the significance of psychostimulants to two doctors in their work with children. Charles Bradley and Leon Eisenberg have, in recent years, figured prominently in historical accounts of ADHD as pioneering advocates of psychopharmalogical treatment of children with hyperactive and inattentive children, in particular with stimulants. Scholars have selectively mined the published works of these two doctors to either validate or contest a biomedical explanation of ADHD and, thus, the appropriateness of pharmacologic treatment. However, each man wrote during distict periods in American intellectual history, and their interpretation of the issues of the day influenced how they framed the results of their studies. A careful reading of the published works of Bradley and Eisenberg in light of their broader historical, intellectual and therapeutic contexts illuminates how both men derived a much wider range of uses for and i interpretations of stimulants as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for a range of children’s disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Capital and Wellbeing Final Project Report
    Mental Capital and Wellbeing: Mental Capital and Wellbeing: Making the most of ourselves in the 21st century Making the most of ourselves in 21st FINAL PROJECT REPORT FINAL PROJECT Mental Capital and Wellbeing: Making the most of ourselves in the 21st century Printed in the UK on recycled paper with a minimum HMSO score of 75 First published October 2008. The Government Office for Science. © Crown copyright. URN 113-08-Fo/b. FINAL PROJECT REPORT 7700-DIUS-Mental Capital and Wellbeing COV A/W.indd 1 10/10/08 13:48:27 Mental Capital and Wellbeing: Making the most of ourselves in the 21st century This report is intended for: Policy makers and a wide range of professionals and researchers whose interests relate to mental capital and wellbeing. The report focuses on the UK but is also relevant to the interests of other countries. This report should be cited as: Foresight Mental Capital and Wellbeing Project (2008). Final Project report. The Government Office for Science, London. 7700-DIUS-Final Project Report5.indd 2 10/10/08 14:17:38 The Government Office for Science (GO-Science) would like to thank the Project’s Science Co-ordination Team who oversaw the technical aspects of the Project, who were involved in much of the work, and who were particularly involved in writing this final report. They were led by Professor Cary Cooper, CBE and are Professor John Field, Professor Usha Goswami, Professor Rachel Jenkins and Professor Barbara Sahakian. GO-Science would also like to thank: Professor Philip Dewe, Professor Eugene Paykel, Professor Felicia Huppert and Mr Chris Riley who also contributed to this final report; Professor Leon Feinstein, Professor Tom Kirkwood and Professor Michiel Kompier who led parts of the first phase of the Project; and the company shiftN who worked on the futures and systems aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • LSE Literary Festival 2014
    Reflections Monday 24 February – Saturday 1 March 2014 1 March Saturday lse.ac.uk/spaceforthought Welcome We are delighted to be hosting LSE’s 6th Literary Festival in 2014, with the kind support of the LSE Institute of Public Affairs. With this year’s theme, Reflections, we are exploring the distinctive qualities of the social sciences’ and the arts’ approaches to understanding both the world around us and our place within it. An important strand of this theme is reflections on the First World War centenary and the value of remembering, but we are also reflecting on the contemporary world and the new generation. As in previous years, the Festival includes talks, readings, panel discussions and film screenings, as well as creative writing workshops and children’s events. We are proud to offer a space for thought, discussion and analysis that is unique in London, encouraging interaction between authors and academics on a global stage. We hope you enjoy this year’s programme. Further details on all events, as well as updates to the programme, can be found at lse.ac.uk/spaceforthought or by following @lsepublicevents #LSElitfest on Twitter. Please do check the website to see the latest information about the events you wish to attend, as details may change. Louise Gaskell Literary Festival Organiser Media Partner We are delighted to be working in partnership with the Times Literary Supplement. Ticket Information All events in the Festival are free to attend and open to all. E-tickets will be available to request after 10am on Tuesday 4 February. For the majority of Festival events there will also be an allocation of seats available on the day of the event, offered on a first come first served basis.
    [Show full text]