DESCRIPTION, EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY, AND NATURAL HISTORY OBSERVATIONS OF HESSLERI, NEW (PHYLLOCARIDA: ), FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WITH A KEY TO THE EXTANT FAMILIES AND GENERA OF THE LEPTOSTRACA

JOEL W. MARTIN, ERIC W. VETTER, AND CORA E. CASH-CLARK

Made in United States of America Reprinted from JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY Vol. 16, No. 2, May 1996 Copyright 1996 by The Crustacean Society JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 16(2): 347-372, 1996

DESCRIPTION, EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY, AND NATURAL HISTORY OBSERVATIONS OF NEBALIA HESSLERI, NEW SPECIES (PHYLLOCARIDA: LEPTOSTRACA), FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WITH A KEY TO THE EXTANT FAMILIES AND GENERA OF THE LEPTOSTRACA

Joel W. Martin, Eric W. Vetter, and Cora E. Cash-Clark

ABSTRACT A new and relatively large species of leptostracan crustacean, Nebalia hessleri, is described from enriched sediments and detrital mats off southern California. The new species is charac­ terized by its size, possession of "normal" (versus lobed) eyes, rectangular and unpaired sub- rostral keel, acute dentition of the posterior pleonite borders, and caudal furca approximately twice the length of the telson. Clark's Nebalia pugettensis (Clark, 1932) is herein declared a nomen nudum. The new species differs from specimens at Friday Harbor, Puget Sound, Wash­ ington, in the form of the epimeron of the fourth pleonite, the dentition along the posterior border of the fifth through seventh pleonites, the relative length of the telson and caudal furca, and size. Coloration may also serve to distinguish N. hessleri from other species if egg-bearing females are available; eggs of N. hessleri are cream or gold colored. The new species differs from a currently unnamed sympatric species that occurs in adjacent sand flats (Vetter, in press) primarily in the morphology of the first antenna, which is greatly reduced in the sand-flat species, and the eye, which has unique dorsal and ventral corneal protrusions in the sand-flat species. Selected aspects of the external morphology of the new species are illustrated via scanning electron microscopy, highlighting a previously unappreciated diversity of spines and setal types. Based on these photographs, some limbs are suggested as having sensory functions. Selected features of the Friday Harbor specimens also are illustrated via SEM. Limited notes on feeding behavior and oxygen level tolerances are provided, based on preliminary laboratory observa­ tions. Finally, we include a morphology-based key to identification of the currently recognized families and genera of the Leptostraca.

The phyllocarid crustacean order Lepto­ nus, Epinebalia, at some later date (see Dis­ straca is currently recognized as comprising cussion). two extant families: Nebaliopsidae Hessler, Recent and ongoing ecological work in 1984, containing only the Nebaliop- the area of La Jolla, San Diego, California, sis G. O. Sars, 1887, and Baird, by one of us (EWV) (Vetter, 1994, 1995, 1850 (emended by Hessler, 1984), contain­ and in press) has demonstrated that there ing the genera Nebalia Leach, 1814, Par- are at least four leptostracan species found anebalia Claus, 1880, Nebaliella Thiele, along the coast of western North America, 1904, Dahlella Hessler, 1984, Sarsinebalia only one of which {N. pugettensis) has been Dahl, 1985, and Speonebalia Bowman, Ya­ previously described (and that one incom­ pletely so), with the description of a second ger, and Iliffe, 1985 (see Hessler, 1984; species currently in press (Vetter, in press). Dahl, 1985; Bowman et al, 1985). In Cal­ In this study, we declare the sole previously ifornia waters, only the genus Nebalia has described west coast species, N. pugettensis been reported, and it has been assumed un­ (Clark, 1932), to be a nomen nudum, and til recently that all specimens belong to a describe a new species from detrital mats in single species, Nebalia pugettensis (Clark, submarine canyons off the coast of southern 1932) (originally described as Epinebalia California. The average number of individ­ pugettensis, transferred to Nebalia by Can­ uals in these mats has been estimated to non, 1960). Because of similarities between reach 1.5 million/m^, contributing to the Clark's description of N. pugettensis and highest density of any macrofaunal assem­ the species described in this paper, it may blage yet reported (Vetter, 1994; see below be necessary to revive Clark's original ge­ and Vetter, 1995, for more detailed habitat

347 348 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY. VOL. 15. NO. 2. 1996 notes). In addition, we extend what little is have added additional descriptive comments that may known about leptostracan ultrastructural or may not prove to be of taxonomic importance once similar structures in other leptostracans become morphology by describing selected mor­ known. In addition, the second antenna of the male is phological features using scanning electron described because of its potential importance as a tax­ microscopy; compare some of these fea­ onomic character. Illustrations were made with the aid tures to those of specimens collected near of a Wild M5APO dissecting microscope and a Nikon Friday Harbor, Washington (the original Labophot, both equipped with a camera lucida. Spec­ imens subjected to scanning electron microscopy were collecting site of A', pugettensis); provide gradually dehydrated to 100% ethanol and transferred preliminary observations on the natural his­ to hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) for air drying (see tory (feeding and oxygen level tolerances) Nation, 1983). Slight sonication was used on some of the new species; and provide a key to samples to clean the cuticular surface. Specimens to be .sonicated were rehydrated to distilled water and the extant families and genera of the Lep- subjected to brief (5-10-s) bursts in an ultrasonic tostraca. cleaner with low amounts of a commercial surfactant added for cleaning; these specimens then underwent ethanol dehydration and HMDS drying. After being MATERIALS AND METHODS mounted on stubs, specimens were sputter-coated with were collected during ecological investi­ gold and examined using a Cambridge Stereoscan 360 gations of the benthic community off the coast of l-a at 1 OkV. Length measurements were made from the tip Jolla, California, U.S.A. The habitat consists of detrital of the rostrum to the center of the posterior emargi- mats with low oxygen levels (see Vetter, 1995) in sub­ nation of the carapace (for carapace length) or to the marine canyons. The habitat is dynamic, with the de­ tip of the caudal furca but excluding the setation (for trital mats expanding during summer periods of calm total length). The female holotype, male allotype, 40 and contracting when surge, generated by winter designated female paratypes, and many other (nonpar- storms, moves some or all of the material deeper into atypic) specimens of the new species are deposited in the canyon. The mats are composed primarily of surf the Crustacea collections of the Natural History Mu­ grass (Phyllospadix spp.) and kelp (Macrocystis pyri- seum of Los Angeles County (LACM). Additional fera (Linnaeus, 1771), Egregia menziesii (Turner, paratypes have been deposited in the National Museum 1808), Laminaria spp., Pterygophora californica Ru- of Natural History, Washington, B.C. (USNM), the precht, 1852), though other algae including Sargassum California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco spp., Ulva sp., Pelvelia fastigiata Setchell and Gardner, (CAS), and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography 1917, and a variety of small red algae are sometimes collection (SIO). common. Collections from which the specimens de­ Cursory observations of feeding behavior were scribed herein were taken were made on 29 February made in the laboratory. To keep animals within the 1992 using an air-powered suction device on a detrital focal range of a vertically and horizontally tracking mat at the head of Scripps Canyon, approximately side-mounted dissecting microscope, narrow aquaria 1,000 m north of the Scripps Institution of Oceanog­ (30 X 30 X 3 cm) were constructed. This arrangement raphy pier, at approximately 32°52.5'N, 117°15.5'W, at allowed individuals to be followed for extended peri­ a depth of 60 feet (19 m). ods of time over the entire volume of the aquarium. The detrital mats were sampled at least monthly, as To determine whether the new species has a greater weather permitted. Cores were taken using a large steel tolerance to low oxygen and elevated hydrogen sulfide cylinder (0.185 m-'), which was used to isolate a por­ relative to other animals from the same or nearby hab­ tion of the mat. Hedge trimmers (shears) were used to itats, a preliminary and somewhat crude experiment cut the detritus along the inner wall of the cylinder, was conducted. The new species, the amphipod Or- and then a vacuum lift was used to remove the material chomene !imode.

Fig. 1. Nebalia hessleri, new species, male (upper) and female. Note forward-curving antenna of male and eggs visible beneath cuticle in female. Photograph courtesy of Dale Stokes, Scripps Institution of Oceanography.

Antennule (Fig. 4): Peduncle composed cluster of 4 stout aesthetascs or aesthetasc- of 4 articles. Second article widest at mid­ like setae and 2 thin unarmed setae at dis- point, with clusters of terminal and subter- todorsal border; in SEM view thinner setae minal setae as illustrated (Fig. 4a) and with curved (possibly artifact of drying) and single dorsal plumose seta. Third article cluster of thicker aesthetasc-like setae ap­ shorter than second, widest distally, with pearing to bear minute annulations at even­ dorsal and ventral terminal setae. Fourth ar­ ly spaced intervals (Fig. 4h). ticle shorter than third, with conspicuous Antenna (Fig. 5): Peduncle composed of row of 6-8 long setae and 4 (occasionally 3 articles, proximal 2 of which with minute 5) stout spines, the latter increasing in size distodorsal teeth. Tooth of second article toward distal part of article, along distola- larger than that of first, and covered with teral border; each spine bearing minute tu­ minute teeth (visible only via SEM; Fig. bercles along curved outer surface and mi­ 5b). Third article slightly longer than sec­ nute subterminal pore (Fig. 4b, c). Anten- ond, and bearing numerous setal types and nular scale elongate and oval, extending to approximately 15 stout spines (variation approximately fifth article of flagellum, likely, and not documented), some of which bearing marginal rows of several distinct being similar to those described for article setal types (Fig. 4a, d-g), including long 4 of antennule (i.e., slightly curved, bearing naked setae, stout, curved setae that are tubercles along outer margin, and having proximally smooth but distally bearing distal pore; Fig. 5c, d). Flagellum distinctly large, blunt serrations (Fig. 4e, g), and lon­ longer than combined articles of peduncle; ger, thinner setae bearing smaller and sharp­ each flagellar article with terminal and sub- er teeth along their entire length (Fig. 4a, f, terminal setae, most of which unarmed, and g). Flagellum well developed, at least 4 covered with minute cuticular scales (Fig. times length of antennular scale and com­ 5e, f)- posed of at least 14 articles, each bearing Mandible (Figs. 6a-f; 7): Palp well de- MARTIN ETAL.: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 351

Fig. 2. Nebalia hessleri, new species, holotype (a) and dissected paratype (b—h). a, Female holotype, lateral view. Scale = 1.0 mm. b. Ventral surface of rostrum showing more or less rectangular subrostral keel, c, Left eyestalk and ocular plate, lateral view, d, Same eyestalk as in (c), dorsal view, e, Posteroventral extremity of epimeron of fourth pleonite and posterior border of protopod of fourth pleopod. / Dorsolateral view of teeth along posterior border of fifth pleonite. g, Same as (/) but for sixth pleonite. h, Anal plates in ventral view. veloped, composed of 3 articles; third arti­ plex, with featherlike setae (i.e., with sinu­ cle equal to or slightly longer than second; ous shaft bearing small lanceolate setules, second approximately twice as long as first each of which with lateral serrations; Figs. and with single seta at approximately four- 6a, 7c, d) extending from proximal fifth to fifths length. Setation of distal article com­ terminus, and with distal row of stouter se- 352 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, 1996

Fig. 3. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, selected SEM photographs of taxonomically important features. a. Anterior region showing general shape of rostrum and eyestalk. Scale = 500 |xm. al = antennule, a2 = antenna, c = carapace, e = eye, r = rostrum, s = antennular scale, b, Subrostral keel, ventral view, with anterior toward right of figure. Scale = 100 |xm. c, Anterior region of ocular plates, showing covering of minute setae. Note also the scalloped pattern of cuticular scales on the eyestalks. Scale = 100 |xm. d. Posterior region, carapace removed, showing pleonites 2-7, telson and base of caudal furca, and pleopods. Scale = 1.0 mm. e. Ventral end of epimeron of fourth pleonite and posterior border of fourth pleopod showing acute dentition. Scale = 200 |xm./ Posterior border of sixth pleonite. Scale = 100 |xm.

Fig. 4. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, first antenna, lateral view, a. Entire appendage, right side, lateral view, b. Armature of distal end of fourth article and base of antennular scale (toward right of photograph). Scale = 100 |xm. c. Higher magnification of distal region of single spine denoted by arrow in (i>). Note tubercles and MARTIN ET AL: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 353

small subterminal pore (white arrow). Scale = 10 jjim. d. Dorsolateral view of antennular scale. Scale = 100 |jLm. e. Higher magnification of stout, upturned serrate setae along dorsal surface of antennular scale border, e.g., as in boxed area of {d). Note row of longer, thinner setae arising beneath this row. Scale = 20 jjim. / Tips of several stout, serrate setae (toward left) and thinner setae of antennular scale (just distal to view in (e)). Scale = 20 |jLm. g, Higher magnification of boxed area in (/), showing armature of stout serrate setae (at top) and comblike teeth of thinner, longer setae (bottom of figure). Scale = 10 jjim. h, Setation of distal segments (3 visible in this photograph) of antennal flagellum. Note curved setae at base of each cluster of stout setae, each of which is subdivided into 3 or 4 regions by slight creases in shaft cuticle. Scale = 100 jjim. 354 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, 1996

Fig. 5. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, second antenna, lateral view, a. Entire appendage, right side, b, Dorsal distal spine on second article of peduncle. Scale = 20 jjim. c, Setation and spination along anterior border of third article (oriented in opposite direction from drawing). Scale = 100 (xm. d. Tip of isolated spine of the type indicated by arrow in (c). Scale = 5.0 ixm. e, Several articles or "pseudoarticles" (because of incomplete sutures) of flagellum showing arrangement of setae. Scale = 100 jJim./ More distal region of flagellum showing setation and minute tubercles covering article. Scale = 50 jjim. MARTIN ETAL: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 355

Fig. 6. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, mandible, a, Entire appendage, right side, b, Distal extremity of palp showing long "sweeping" setae and more distal cluster of stout serrate setae. Scale = 50 jjim. c, Higher magnification of stout serrate setae. Scale = 20 jjim. d. Incisor process, lateral view. Scale = 50 jjim. e, Higher magnification of "comb row" of lower, sinuous blade of incisor process. Scale = 20 jjim. f, Molar process, distal end-on view (incisor process to the right). Scale = 50 jjim. g, Tracing of photograph of mandibular palp of N. pugettensis in Clark (1932) shown for comparison; differences between this and Fig. 6a are mostly because of orientation of the appendage; see text. 356 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, 1996

Fig. 7. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, selected SEM photographs of mandible, a. Posterior surface of distal region of palp, showing extension of row of stout, serrate setae. Note curvature of each seta at approxi­ mately one-third distance from base. Scale =100 |xm. b, Tips of stout serrate setae in box in (a) showing distal "twist" and rectangular nature of lateral setules. Scale = 20 |xm. c, Feathery sweeping setae found along upper half of palp. Scale = 50 |xm. d. Higher magnification of sweeping setae showing serrated, lanceolate setules. Scale = 20 (jim. e, f. Details of grinding surface of molar process. Scale = 5 |xm for (e), 10 |xm for (/).

Fig. 8. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, first and second maxillae, a. First maxilla, left side, lateral view, with several setal types found on dorsal endite illustrated below, b, SEM of tridentate setae characteristic of dorsal endite, with white arrow indicating centrally located pore. Scale =10 |xm. c. Long "grooming" setae of elongate palp. Scale = 20 (jim. d. Second maxilla, right side, lateral view. MARTIN ET AL.: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 357 35S JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOC3Y, VOL 16, NO, 2, 199« tae overlying this row. Distal stout setae to have 1, other times 2 or 3, suture lines curved and bearing heavy almost rectan­ separating distal articles. Exopod extending gular serrulations, appearing as unit to be to approximately 0.8 to 0.9 length of en­ effective scraping device (Figs. 6a-c; 7a, dopod, unarmed or with scattered simple b). Incisor process (Fig. 6d, e) long and setae along margin, distally widest, always thin, with short sharp teeth along inner (me­ exceeding length of epipod. Epipod more or dial) face. Molar process (Figs. 6a, f; 7e, f) less bilobed, with lobes divided by thin slightly concave, with inner field composed band of presumed connective tissue; epipod of rows of stout, densely spaced teeth, giv­ becoming less obviously bilobed and de­ ing rise to more widely spaced teeth and creasing in size relative to endopod in pos­ long spines toward periphery. terior limbs (e.g., compare thoracopods 1 First maxilla (Fig. 8a-c): Distal endite and 4 (Fig. 9a, b) with thoracopod 8 (Fig. twice as long as proximal and carrying row 9c)). of stout, distally widened and trifid setae on Pleonites: Posterior borders of all pleon- outer margin. Other setal types including ites bearing sharp, widely spaced teeth long setose or simple setae restricted to dis­ (Figs. 2a, f, g; 3f) and with slightly scal­ tal part of endite, and row of spatulate setae loped cuticular scales bearing minute teeth just distal to row of trifid setae (Fig. 8a). along posterior border (visible only under Trifid setae nearly smooth basally, giving SEM; Fig. 3f). rise to smooth setules toward distal tip, and Fleopods 1^: First pleopod (Fig. lOa-d) with central of 3 terminal teeth slightly lon­ exopod approximately two-thirds as long as ger than flanking teeth and bearing small protopod. Exopod with approximately 36 pore (white arrow. Fig. 8b). Palp approxi­ stout, serrate spines along lateral border mately 5 times longer than combined length (Fig. 10b, d), 4 stout smooth spines on dis- of both endites of protopod and bearing tolateral border increasing in size toward evenly spaced, long setae, each appearing apex, with terminal spine by far largest, and naked under light microscopy, but bearing approximately 20 plumose natatory setae minute lateral setulations visible under along medial margin. Under SEM, stout SEM; each seta strongly recurved and bear­ serrate spines of the lateral border distally ing longer setules at extremity (Fig. 8c) tridentate, with stout central projection Second maxilla (Fig. 8d); Protopod sub­ flanked on either side by sinuous, acutely divided into 4 endites, with endites 1 and 3 tipped shorter projection. Endopod slightly approximately equal in size and larger than longer than exopod, 2-segmented, with plu­ either endite 2 or 4. Endopod longer than mose setae on lateral and medial borders of exopod, composed of 2 articles, basal one distal (longer) segment and with basal seg­ longest and slightly shorter than exopod. ment giving rise to short appendix interna. All endites, endopod, and exopod bearing Appendix interna bearing 3 short, stout, dis­ plumose setae; distal plumose setae of sec­ tally recurved hooks (retinacula) for cou­ ond article of endopod very long, approach­ pling with similar hooks on appendix inter­ ing length of entire limb. na of opposing first pleopod of other side. Thoracopods (Fig. 9): Endopod always Protopod with stout, smooth spines arising exceeding length of exopod. Distal article near base of endopod and exopod as shown of endopod of each thoracopod slightly en­ (Fig. lOa-c). Second pleopod (Figs. lOe, larged, turned rather sharply at angle from 11) exopod without row of stout serrate se­ main axis, and bearing numerous long, plu­ tae, instead with row of spine pairs; spine mose setae (Fig. 9d-f), thereby indicating pair consisting of 1 long and 1 short spine, mature females (following categorization of both covered with minute triangular cutic­ Dahl, 1985: 140; figs. 6-10). Plumose setae ular scales on all but tip, and both with sub- of distal article of endopod extremely terminal, twisted seta of presumed sensory dense, with setules long and overlapping function (Fig. lie, d). Endopod with long with those of adjacent setae on the same natatory setae on lateral and medial bor­ appendage and also with those of opposing ders. Both endopod and exopod with long (opposite side) thoracopod, forming floor of heavy spine at distal terminus. Appendix in­ brood pouch (Fig. 9e, f). Endopod weakly terna with 3 stout recurved hooks (retinac­ divided into articles, sometimes appearing ula, Fig. llf) as described for pleopod 1; MARTIN ET AL.: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 359

/ / Fig. 9. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, selected thoracopods. a, Thoracopod 1, left side, anterior view. b, Thoracopod 4, right side, anterior view, c, Thoracopod 8, right side, anterior view, d, Thoracopod 7 (different ) to show approximate setation. e, Detail of tip of endopod of same thoracopod shown in {d) to illustrate density of setules. / SEM of same region. Scale = 200 ixm. these hooks protected ventrally by setose examined in detail (see Figs. 2a, 3d for low papillae extending ventrally and medially to magnification views). cover them, not visible in ventral view with Pleopods 5 and 6: Pleopod 5 (Fig. 12a- opposing pleopods (right and left) coupled c) 2-segmented, uniramous, with 6 well-de­ (Fig. lie). Protopod with long, stout spines veloped spines along distal lateral and ter­ near bases of endopod and exopod, and minal border, increasing in size distally, and with row of sabrelike teeth on anterolateral with numerous setae lining medial border; corner (Figs. 10b, 1 la, b). Third and fourth these long setae on medial border being pleopods presumed similar to second, not somewhat "jointed" at approximately mid- 360 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, 1996

Fig. 10. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, first and second pleopods. a. First pleopod, left side, anterior view, b, SEM photograph of pleopods 1—3 (partial) in situ. Note row of stout tridentate spines along lateral border of exopod of pleopod 1. Scale = 200 |xm. c, SEM photograph of pleopod 1, anterior view showing basal region of endopod and exopod and appendix interna. Scale = 200 |xm. d, SEM photograph of characteristic stout serrate setae from lateral border of exopod, pleopod 1. Scale = 20 |xm. e, pleopod 2, left side, anterior view, and part of appendix interna of opposite side (pleopod 2, right side). MARTIN ETAL.: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 361

Fig. 11. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, SEM photographs of pleopods 1 and 2. a, Pleopod 2, distal region of protopod and base of exopod, and pleopod I, comb row of stout serrate setae (at lower left). Note knifelike serrations of anterolateral corner of pleopod 2 protopod (white box) where it contacts comb row of pleopod 1. Scale = 100 |xm. b, Higher magnification of knife-like serrations indicated in (a). Scale = 5.0 |xm. c. Pairs of stout spinelike setae, lateral border of exopod of pleopod 2. Scale = 50 |xm. d. Detail of tip of spinelike seta indicated by box in (c). Note covering of triangular scales directed distally, smooth terminus, and twisted subterminal seta. Scale = 10 |xm. e, Appendix interna of pleopod 2 (right and left sides coupled), ventral view, showing setose fleshy papillae covering interlocking coupling hooks (retinacula). Scale = 50 |xm. / Appendix interna, pleopod 2, hooklike coupling setae (uncoupled from corresponding pleopod). Scale = 20 |xm. length; there corrugations of cuticle appear­ gin of distalmost spine bearing circlet of ing to confer some flexibility on setal shaft sharp teeth (Fig. 12f). Lateral and distal (Fig. 12b, c). Pleopod 6 1-segmented, uni- spines of both pleopods 5 and 6 covered ramous, with 6 lateral and distal spines in­ with short triangular scales and bearing creasing in size distally and with scattered short, twisted subterminal seta of presumed simple setae among these spines and along sensory function (Fig. 12g). Both pleopod medial border. Terminus of pleopod at ori­ pairs with broad triangular ventral process 362 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, 1996

Fig. 12. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, pleopods 5 and 6. a, Pleopod 5, right and left, ventral view, b, SEM photograph of right pleopod 5, ventral view. Scale = 200 \x,m. c. Higher magnification of box shown in (b), showing annulations presumed to confer flexibility on setal shaft. Scale = 5.0 jjim. d, Pleopod 6, left side, ventral view, e, SEM photograph of right and left pleopod 6, ventral view. Scale = 200 jjim. f, Higher magni­ fication of box shown in (e), showing circlet of sharp teeth surrounding base of distalmost spine of pleopod. Note also cuticular microscales. Scale = 20 jjim. g, Tip of penultimate spine, indicated by box in (e). Note covering of triangular scales, terminal area lacking scales, and twisted subterminal seta, as described for anterior pleopods (Fig. lid). Scale = 5.0 \Lm. extending posteriorly between bases of broad base to acute extremity, with outer rami, more acutely triangular and longer in (lateral) borders smoothly curved and with pleopod 6 (Fig. 12a, d, e). medial borders slightly bulging along mid- Telson, anal plates, and caudal furca: Tel- length; overall appearance more acute than son (Figs. 2a, 3d, 13a, b) short, approxi­ typical for genus. Caudal furca elongate, mately as long as wide, rectangular, or with ranging from slightly less than 2 times to sides slightly diverging posteriorly. Anal more than 2.3 times length of telson, ap­ plates (Figs. 2h, 13c) sharply tapering from proximately equal to length of telson plus MARTIN ETAL: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 363

Fig. 13. Nebalia hessleri, new species, female, telson, anal plates, and caudal rami, a, Telson and caudal rami, ventral view, b, SEM photograph of same region. Suture line connecting telson with anterior somite occurs just at upper edge of photograph. Scale = 1.0 mm. c, Anal plates (upper box in {b)), ventral view. Scale =100 |xm. d, Lateral spines of caudal ramus (lower box in {b)). Note covering of minute microscales. Scale = 50 |xm. pleon segment 7. Furcal rami each with 16- eyes. When viewed with naked eye thoracic 20 spines along inner margin and with up region appearing almost white. Some males to 24 spines along lateral margin; these with slightly ruddy hue, especially in tho­ spines gradually increasing in length pos­ racic region. Eggs (barely visible in Fig. 1, teriorly with last two much longer than any lower photograph) are gold or cream col­ of anterior spines; of these last two spines ored. terminal being longer, almost twice length of penultimate spine. Inner margins of each Distribution.—To date known only from branch also bearing short setae. the type locality. Our prediction is that the Coloration: In life, specimens appeared known range will increase with heightened mostly transparent except for bright red efforts at collecting and identifying leptos- 364 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY. VOL. 16. NO. 2. 1996 tracans throughout California and other lo­ mouthparts. The meat was rapidly tumbled calities in the eastern Pacific. and turned in front of the mouth until it was Etymology.—We are pleased to name this either entirely consumed or was ejected by species after our friend and colleague, Rob­ a current of water that shot out from the ert R. Hessler, in honor of his many excel­ region of the mouth in a line normal to the lent contributions to crustacean morphology long axis of the animal. When large pieces and systematics. of food were not present, the animals fed by lying on their backs and using their an­ Remarks.—The new species shares some tennules to cast sediment into the space be­ features with specimens collected from Fri­ tween their thoracopods. This material was day Harbor, Washington. These characters then moved toward the mouth and tumbled include common eye morphology, with around the mouthparts. Some particles were both species possessing "normal" leptos- rejected immediately via the stream of wa­ tracan eyes, and the shape of the male sec­ ter flowing out from the mouth region, ond antenna. It can be differentiated from whereas other particles were tumbled for that species by the shape of the teeth along variable periods before being ejected. Ani­ the posterior borders of the pleonites, the mals fed only field-collected, organically shape and dentition of the epimeron of the enriched sediments grew and reproduced fourth pleonite, the relative lengths of the normally. Within the detritus mat habitat of caudal furca and telson, and by overall size these animals, vertebrate and invertebrate (see Discussion). carcasses are frequently seen and are ex­ The new species differs from all other ploited by A^. hessleri and the lysianassoid described species of Nebalia in having 14 amphipod Orchomene limades Meador and or more segments on the antennal flagellum Present, 1985, which is also extremely of mature females and a rostrum that is ap­ abundant in this habitat (Vetter, 1994). In­ proximately 2.7 times longer than wide (see deed, these two species, A^. hessleri and O. Discussion). A smaller cooccuring species limodes, are the dominant in of Nebalia, occupying a different microhab- this rich habitat and are the primary con­ itat (adjacent sand flats), is easily distin­ tributors to what is now known as the high­ guished by the greatly reduced antennular est density of any macrofaunal assemblage flagellum and by the presence of unusual yet reported, with an estimated 2 million lobes on the eye of the sand-flat species individuals/m^ (Vetter, 1994). Cannibalism (Vetter, in press). was observed on several occasions. When live, but apparently distressed, adults (a NATURAL HISTORY slightly opaque white, rather than clear, ap­ Preliminary Observations on Feeding pearance was taken to indicate some type of distress) were attacked, the aggressor in­ In the laboratory, leptostracans fed on serted its head into the victim's thoracic large pieces of meat (e.g., fish, shrimp, fish- cavity and, apparently with some difficulty, containing cat food, and squid) by scraping partially ate the victim's thoracopods. Once off chunks, using the peduncle of the first the victim was dead, the back of the head antenna, which bears a row of strong spines was also eaten. When dead conspecifics (e.g.. Fig. 4b). The animals remained in were provided, N. hessleri similarly con­ contact with the meat often for five minutes sumed the thoracopods and the head. or more, and produced a continuous fecal strand that sometimes rivaled the length of the animal. In such cases, the fecal strand Preliminary Observations on Oxygen was the same color as the food and thus Level Tolerance possibly was poorly processed. If sufficient Nebalia hessleri lives in thick detritus numbers of individuals were present, they mats with low oxygen levels (Vetter, 1995) completely covered the meat, apparently and, judging by the odor, elevated sulfide. using their antennules both to brace them­ In the laboratory, when not swimming or selves against the food and to hold on to it. burrowing, the animals typically rested on With tough pieces of meat, such as squid, their backs or sides. The thoracic append­ N. hessleri tore off a piece of meat and laid ages rarely stopped moving. Occasionally, on its back while processing it with its when the animals were neither swimming MARTIN iiJ .4L.: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 365 nor feeding, the thoracopods would be mo­ sume that any Nebalia encountered on the tionless, but rarely for more than a few min­ west coast must belong to that species, and utes. When placed in anoxic or hypoxic wa­ thus virtually all guidebooks and keys (e.g., ter, the animals swam to the surface and Reish, 1972; Haderiie et at. 1980; Rickets rested on the side of the aquarium with their et al, 1985; Smith and Cariton, 1980; Ko- heads in the surface film, using their thor­ zloff, 1987) list this species as the sole west acopods to draw water from the very sur­ coast representative of the Nebaliacea (al­ face of the aquarium over their respiratory though Kozloff, 1987: 320, was aware of appendages. Placed in a stoppered flask of an undescribed species in the intertidal and anoxic water, they behaved normally for 8- subtidal of the Pacific Northwest). Because 12 h, after which they sought out the sur­ of this uncertainty, we were forced to de­ face. With no air-water interface available clare N. pugettensis a nomen nudum. they eventually settled to the bottom and We have examined specimens from Fri­ continued to beat their thoracopods. They day Harbor, Washington, a site much closer then occasionally swam to the top of the to the original collecting site for N. puget­ flask and then swam around the flask, pre­ tensis (Puget Sound, Washington) than is sumably searching for more favorable con­ our collecting site off La Jolla, California. ditions. Most animals perished after 14 h in There is no guarantee that these specimens anoxic conditions (Vetter, 1995), but re­ belong to the species described by Clark, vived completely if removed to aerated wa­ since there may be several species found in ter just prior to death (i.e., at around 13 h). that area. We point out here the following When exposed to both anoxic conditions features (some of which are shown in Fig. and high sulfide levels, animals behaved 14) that serve to differentiate between these similarly but died sooner (6-7 h; Fig. 15). Friday Harbor specimens and N. hessleri. The results were roughly similar for the am- (1) In the Friday Harbor specimens the epi- phipod Orchomene Umodes, which occurs meron of the fourth pleonite bears shorter, with N. hessleri in the detrital mats. Sur­ broader, and blunter teeth along its posterior vival for both N. hessleri and O. Umodes border, and the posterolateral comer tapers was far greater than it was for another am- more gradually toward a blunt tip (Fig. phipod (Aorides spinosus Conlan and Bous- 14a). The basal article of the corresponding field, 1982) that occurs in both the detritus fourth pleopod does not bear sharp teeth mats and the adjacent sand flat. As might along its posterior border (compare Figs. be expected, crustaceans and one pycno- 14a, 2e, 3e). (2) The posterior borders of gonid known only from the relatively well- pleonites 5 and 6 (Fig. 14b), and indeed of oxygenated sand-flat area died relatively all pleonites, bear short, closely spaced quickly under these conditions (Fig. 15). teeth that are markedly truncated distally, appearing nearly rectangular, in the Friday Harbor specimens (Fig. 14c). (3) The cau­ DISCUSSION dal furcae in the Friday Harbor specimens Comparison to Other Descriptions of are relatively short, exceeding the length of Leptostracans from the West Coast of the telson, but clearly less than twice its North America length (Fig. 14d), whereas in A^. hessleri the One of the factors hindering leptostracan caudal furcae are sometimes more than along the west coast of North twice the length of the telson (Fig. 13a, b). America has been the rather incomplete (4) Overall differs significantly, with original description of Nebalia pugettensis the new species attaining lengths of up to (as Epinebalia) by Clark (1932). Clark il­ 15 mm in adult females (although 9-11 mm lustrated few of what are now considered is more common), versus 7 mm in our Fri­ taxonomically important features of leptos­ day Harbor specimens and reported by tracans (see Dahl, 1985), and unfortunately Clark (1932: 226) for N. pugettensis. Dahl did not deposit any type material, according (1985: 136) also described specimens of to our search of United States and Canadian Nebalia from this area (which he referred natural history museums. Without type ma­ to as N. pugettensis) as small, with "cara­ terial or a detailed description for compar­ pace lengths only rarely exceeding 3.5 ison, subsequent workers have had to as­ mm" (versus up to 6.8 mm in N. hessleri). 366 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, 1996

Fig. 14. Selected features of specimens (female) of an undescribed species of Nebalia collected at Friday Harbor, Washington, a. Posterolateral border of fourth pleon and base of corresponding limb (fourth pleopod). Note size and shape of teeth as compared to Fig. \e, 2e. Scale = 200 jjim. b, Dorsolateral region of pleon 5 and 6. Scale = 100 jjim. c, Higher magnification of teeth along posterior border of pleon 6. Note truncate terminus as compared to similar teeth in Figs. 1/ g, 2/ Scale = 50 jjim. d. Ventral view of telson, anal plates, and caudal furca. Compare relative size of furcal rami to telson with what is seen in Figs, la, 12a, b. Scale = 500 jjim.

(5) In addition, although not shown here, is a photograph taken from a posterior an­ the coloration of the eggs may differ be­ gle, in such a way that the palp is oriented tween these species. In N. hessleri, eggs are with its flat blade parallel to the body axis. cream or gold colored, whereas eggs are ap­ In other words, the distal article was pho­ parently pink in at least one species of Ne­ tographed on edge, resulting in the thin, balia from Moss Landing, California (per­ elongate appearance seen in Fig. 6g (traced sonal communication, Cathy LeFaye, Moss from Clark's photograph). The curving, Landing, California). In light of our declar­ "rasping" setae described by Clark (1932) ing N. pugettensis a nomen nudum and the are part of the row of curved stout setae on uncertainty of identifications of west coast the external (outer) face of the distal article leptostracans, there is at this time no cer­ of the palp (Figs. 6b, c, 7a, b); turning the tainty as to the identity of the Moss Land­ mandible of N. hessleri on edge yields a ing species. Those specimens came from a profile similar to that shown by Clark. similar intertidal mud-flat habitat as did our Dahl (1985), in his revision of the Eu­ Friday Harbor specimens. ropean shelf species of Nebalia, included Although the figure of the mandibular some valuable ontogenetic data for reared palp of N. pugettensis in Clark (1932) is specimens of what he called A^. pugettensis very different from that in the present study (see Dahl, 1985: 137, table 1). His speci­ (Figs. 6a-f, 7), this should not be consid­ mens came from "near the Marine Biolog­ ered a diagnostic character. Clark's figure ical Station at Friday Harbor, Washington," (reproduced here as Fig. 6g for comparison) and were apparently from a mud environ- MARTIN ET At.: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 367

doubt that the two species described in our paper are distinct, there are almost certainly other undescribed species along the Pacific GOOD Northwest, and there is no guarantee that

OX) our Friday Harbor, Washington, specimens are the same as, or even morphologically close to, whatever Clark (1932) described as A^. pugettensis. Comparison to Other Species of Nebalia Leach, 1814 The possibility that A^. hessleri is an in­ troduced species was considered in light of the increasing problem of exotic species be­ ing introduced into California via shipping Fig. 15. Comparison of survival time (in hours) un­ der conditions of anoxia and elevated sulfide levels for (e.g., see Carlton and Geller, 1993). How­ species known only from the detrital mats ever, several features serve to separate N. {Nebalia hessleri, Orchomene limodes) versus a spe­ hessleri from any other previously de­ cies that occupies both the detrital mats and adjacent, scribed member of the genus. First, the an- better oxygenated sand flats (Aoroides spinosus) versus several species known only from sand flats. L = lep- tennular flagellum of the mature female tostracan, A = amphipod, I = isopod, T = tanaida- bears 14 or more segments (Figs. 2a, 4a). cean. Circles represent higher concentrations (2.08 No other species is known to have more mmol) of hydrogen sulfide. than 11; this number of segments is seen only in females of A^. falklandensis Dahl, 1990, A^. antarctica Dahl, 1990, A^. strausi ment, since he stated that "sifted mud from Risso, 1826, A^. herbstii Leach, 1814, and the collecting site" was pipetted into the the male of the species that occupies sand dishes from time to time to renew their food flats adjacent to the habitat of A^. hessleri supply (Dahl, 1985: 136). Thus, our Friday (Vetter, in press). In addition, the rostrum Harbor specimens (Fig. 14) and Dahl's of A^. hessleri is approximately 2.7 times its specimens may belong to the same species, width. Nebalia longicornis Thomson, 1879, although there is also the strong likelihood and the undescribed sand-flat Nebalia have that such areas contain more than one spe­ long, thin rostrums as well, but neither ex­ cies of leptostracan, as we are finding to be ceeds a length of 2.6 times the width. This the case in southern California. The habitat combination of features distinguishes A^. of Clark's specimens was not listed by her; hessleri from all other species in the genus. she stated only that they came "from Puget Sound" via the Pacific Biological Labora­ Note on Males of A^. hessleri tories in Pacific Grove, California. Packard Because of the rarity of males in most (1883) mentioned a species that he felt was populations (and therefore in most collec­ similar to the European A^. bipes (O. Fabri- tions) of leptostracans, Dahl (1985) rec­ cius, 1780) collected from "just below low- ommended that they not be used in species water mark among fucoids" (as cited by descriptions. However, males in our collec­ Clark, 1932: 225; Packard's monograph not tions are relatively common. Although not seen by us). Our specimens were collected counted, we estimate that males constituted from a mudflat, as apparently were those of perhaps 20% to 40% of our collections. Ad­ Dahl (1985). Packard also mentioned hav­ ditionally, we found it interesting that, al­ ing collected "what is probably a fifth spe­ though there can be little doubt as to the cies" between tide marks at Victoria, Van­ distinctness of our new species, males of A^. couver Island, British Columbia. According hessleri are similar to males of Clark's to Clark (1932), that specimen was lost. (1932) ''Nebalia pugettensis,'" in at least This lost specimen might be what Kozloff one character. Males of A^. hessleri have a (1987: 320) was referring to when he men­ second antenna that is curved rather sharply tioned an undescribed species in the Pacific in an anterior direction. Most often this Northwest. Thus, whereas there is little condition appears as in the male allotype of 368 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, 1996

N. hessleri (Fig. 16a), but considerable vari­ tal outer surface (Fig. 4b, c). A similar con­ ation exists, with the antenna sometimes ex­ dition is seen in the spines bordering the tending almost directly anteriorly (Fig. 16b) distal article of the antennal peduncle (Fig. and at other times curved medially so that 5a, c, d). Although it is certainly possible the two opposing rami are crossed (Fig. for setae and spines lacking such pores to 16c) or even appearing slightly cork­ be chemosensory devices, with chemical screwed (Fig. 16d). Clark (1932: 225) de­ mediators being transported across the thin scribed this as "forwardly directed, sickle- cuticle of the appendage instead of via a shaped antennae, bearing a strong resem­ pore (Laverack and Barrientos, 1985), it is blance to the antennules of male cyclo- unlikely that such pores would be present poids," and based her new genus on a seta or spine with no such function. Epinebalia on this one character of the An alternative explanation, that these de­ males. pressions are "molting pores," is easily dis­ missed by comparing the presumed chemo­ Functional Morphology sensory setae to surrounding spines and se­ Another factor that currently hinders tae, none of which bear a similar terminal comparisons of N. hessleri with other spe­ depression. Pores are also seen on the cen­ cies of Nehalia along the west coast is that tral spike of the tridentate spines of the first very few species have been examined via maxilla (Fig. 8a, b). Although these spines SEM. Thus, it is difficult to know whether and setae have been illustrated accurately some of the unusual ultrastructural features by previous workers (in this genus and in described herein, such as the twisted distal other leptostracan genera), the pores are a subterminal seta on the pleopodal spines, or new finding, and suggest a sensory role in the minute pore on the tip of the spines addition to the mechanical function of this found on the antennular fourth article, are limb. Also suggestive of a sensory function unique to this species versus shared by are the thin, twisted setae found on the sub- some or all members of the genus or per­ terminal undersurface of the rather heavy haps shared by all leptostracans. The only spines of the pleopods (Figs, lie, d, 12e, previous electron microscope studies of lep­ g). Although we did not obtain sufficient tostracans of which we are aware are the resolution to determine whether these thin, survey of European shelf species by Dahl straplike setae have distal openings, the im­ (1985), which included only two SEM pression given is that they do (especially plates, a brief note on epipods by ltd see Figs. 1 Id, 12g). (1988), and the study of spermiogenesis Although SEM has not been widely ap­ (coincidentally also using 'W. pugetten- plied to leptostracans for taxonomic pur­ sis") by Jesperson (1979), in which only poses, some authors have illustrated spine transmission electron microscopy was em­ and setal types that appear very similar to ployed. Dahl's SEM photographs included those we have shown in N. hessleri. For only the dorsolateral teeth of the sixth and example, the characteristic spines along the seventh pleonite borders in four species (his lateral border of the first pleopod have been figs. 107-114) and one view of the setae of illustrated in nearly all descriptions of lep­ the first pleopod of N. horealis (his fig. tostracan species, and the better illustrated 115). The acutely toothed pleonite borders accounts (e.g., Wagele, 1983; Hessler, of N. hessleri (Figs. 2f, g, 3f) are most sim­ 1984) even include figures of the array of ilar to those of M horealis (see Dahl, 1985: setal types on the maxillae, pleopods, etc. figs. 109, 110). The rich diversity of spine The emerging picture is one of great uni­ and setal types and the cuticular scales sug­ formity of setal and spine types in this or­ gest that SEM may prove to be a valuable der. Even in those species occupying dis­ tool in leptostracan systematics, as has cer­ parate and unusual habitats (e.g., Dahlella tainly been the case for other small crusta­ at deep-sea hydrothermal vents, Speoneba- cean taxa. lia in caves), the setal types and their lo­ Some of the features illustrated herein are cations appear similar. Despite the fact that possibly indicative of sensory roles. This is we have revealed previously unknown ul­ true for the spines of the fourth article of trastructural details of setae and spines in the antennule, which bear a pore on the dis­ one leptostracan, overall it appears that di- MARTIN ET AL: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 369

Fig. 16. Nebalia hessleri, new species, figures of the male second antenna, a. Allotype male, CL 2.8 mm excluding rostrum, same collection data as for female types, with first and second antenna illustrated, b-d. Variations in the shape and curvature of the flagellum of the second antenna (both right and left sides shown in (c) and {d)) in similar-sized males in the collection. 370 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO, 2, 1996

versity of these structures within the Lep- molar process. First maxilla with palp long, well tostraca is not great. Thus, although ultra- developed. Second maxilla much smaller than thoracopod 1; endopod I- or 2-segmented; en­ structural details may provide species-spe­ dopod and exopod well developed, each longer cific characters, we are in agreement with than wide; first three endites similarly developed Dahl's (1985: 138) statement that among (proximal endite not enormously enlarged, al­ leplostracan species and genera "basic ar­ though slightly larger than other endites), Pleo­ pods 2-A with exopods slender, more than 4 mature pattern is remarkably uniform." times longer than wide. Caudal rami tapering This also leads us to suspect that structures evenly from base to tip , , .2 (Family Nebaliidae newly described here as being sensory in Baird, 1850; emend. Hessler, 1984) nature, such as the subterminal twisted seta 2, Eyestalk long, clearly exceeding rostrum in ma­ on the pleopodal spines, are probably to be ture individuals, gently curved or abruptly an­ gled ventrally, tapering distally, lacking any vi­ found in other leptostracans as well. sual pigment 3 Finally, this work supports and under­ - Eyestalk short, not exceeding length of rostrum scores the comments of Dahl (1987) con­ in mature individuals (or, if exceeding length of cerning the morphology of leptostracans as rostrum, then not deflected ventrally [Speane- halia]}, widest at midpoint (not tapering), with compared to other "phyllopodous" crusta­ or without visual pigment 4 ceans (particularly the Branchiopoda). The 3, Eyestalk with abrupt angle on anterodorsal sur­ SEM photographs highlight the fact that face, and with anterior margin flattened and even at an ultrastructural level, the thora- bearing minute lobes. Second maxilla with ex­ copodal appendages of nebaliaceans are opod reduced, less than half length of proximal article of endopod. Posterior emargination of grossly different from those of branchio- carapace lacking minute spines along either side pods, possessing a suite of spines and setae of midpoint, Thoracopods with well-developed such as is seen in no living or extinct bran- epipods Dahlella Hessler, 1984 chiopod (e.g., see Martin et ah, 1986; Mar­ - Eyestalk smoothly curving on anterodorsal sur­ tin, 1992; Martin and Christiansen, in face, banana- or sausage-shaped, not flattened on anterior margin, lacking minute lobes. Second press). maxilla with exopod more than half length of Because so few SEM studies exist for proximal article of endopod {usually exceeding other species of Nehalia or other leptostra- length of proximal article of endopod). Posterior can genera, for purposes of identification at emargination of carapace minutely spinulose along either side of midpoint, Thoracopods lack­ present we recommend reliance on previ­ ing epipods Nebaliella Thiele, 1904 ously recognized morphological (versus ul­ 4, Pleopod I with row of stout, equally sized, com­ trastructural) characters, and suggest the plex serrate spines along outer (lateral) margin following key to leptostracan families and of exopod. Eyes with at least some visual pig­ genera (mostly compiled from information ment 6 - Pleopod 1 lacking row of stout, equally sized, in Hessler, 1984; Dahl, 1985; Bowman et complex serrate spines along outer (lateral) mar­ al, 1985; and Modlin, 1991). gin of exopod. Eyes lacking visual pigment , , 5 5, Carapace long, extending posteriorly to ju.st be­ KEY TO THE EXTANT FAMILIES AND GENERA yond level of fifth pleonite, sometimes as far as sixth pleonite, Eyestalks narrow, tapering distal­ OF THE LEPTOSTRACA ly, slightly exceeding length of reduced rostrum. I. Thoracic region appearing inflated. Carapace Maxilla 2 endopod I-segmented, with series of and body cuticle thin, membranous. Carapace oval organelles (glands). Rostrum lacking distal lacking posterior medial indentation and with spine. Caudal rami very short, length approxi­ slight sculpturing. Mandible lacking incisor pro­ mately equal to width of telson, with densely cess and with reduced molar process. First max­ spaced long setae illa with palp reduced to small stub. Second Speonebalia Bowman et al., 1985 maxilla nearly as large as thoracopod 1; endopod - Carapace short, not extending posteriorly be­ 1-segmented and reduced to small, blunt, distal yond fifth pleonite. Eyestalks laterally com­ lobe; exopod absent; proximal endite enormous­ pressed, disc-shaped or subrectangular, never ex­ ly enlarged. Pleopods l-A with exopods paddle­ ceeding length of rostrum. Maxilla 2 endopod 2- like, less than 3 times longer than wide. Caudal segmented, lacking glands. Rostrum with minute rami leaflike, broadest at midpoint distal spine articulating with rostral cuticle. Cau­ Family Nebaliopsidae Hessler, 1984 dal rami slender, length more than twice length (Nebaliopsis G. O. Sars, 1887) of telson, with widely spaced setae - Thoracic region not inflated. Carapace and body Sarsinebalia Dahl, 1985 cuticle more or less firm. Carapace strongly 6, Antenna 1 peduncle distal (fourth) segment with emarginate (indented) posteromesially and lack­ distolateral, toothed processes, but not with ar­ ing sculpturing. Mandible with well-developed mature of spines (as, e,g,, in Nebalia). Mandib­ incisor (Paranehalia is an exception to this) and ular incisor weakly developed, Thoracopods nar- MARTIN EZAL: NEW NEBALIA FROM SOUTHERN C-JUJFORNIA 37 P

row and long, almost flagelliform. Epipods of ICZN, 1985. International Code of Zoological No­ thoracopods present but reduced in size, with menclature, third edition, adopted by the XX Gen­ surface area less than half that of endopod. Eyes eral Assembly of the International Union of Biolog­ often bearing spines that increase in size distally ical Sciences.—International Trust for Zoological Paranehalia Claus, 1880 Nomenclature and British Museum of Natural His­ - Antenna 1 peduncle distal (fourth) segment tory. Pp. i-xx. 1-338. University of California Press, without distolateral, toothed process, instead Berkeley, California. with stout spines. Mandibular incisor well de­ Ito, X 1988. Location of the epipod on the thoracic veloped. Thoracopods expanded, leaflike. Epi­ limbs in (Crustacea: leptostraca).— pods of thoracopods well developed, surface Annual Report of the Seto Marine Biological Lab­ area clearly one-half or more that of endopod. oratory 2: 36-39. [In Japanese.] Eyes sometimes with blunt lobes but never with Jespersen, A. 1979. Spermiogenesis in two species of numerous spines Nebalia Leach (Crustacea, , Phyllocar­ Nebalia Leach, 1814 ida).—Zoomorphologie 93: 87-97. Kozloff, E. N. 1987. Marine invertebrates of the Pa­ cific Northwest.—University of Washington Press, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Seattle, Washington. Pp. i-vi, 1-511. Both JWM and CCC thank EWV for originally Laverack, M. S., and Y. Barrientos. 1985. Sensory and bringing these specimens to our attention, and for dis­ other superficial structures in living marine Crusta­ cussing with us some of the many interesting morpho­ cea.—Xransaclions of the Royal Society of Edin­ logical features of leptostracans. This paper resulted in burgh 76: 123-136. part from a 1993 meeting of SCAMIT, the Southern Martin, J. W. 1992. Branchiopoda.—/«.- E W. Harri­ California Association of Marine Invertebrate Taxon- son, editor-in-chief. Microscopic anatomy of inver­ omists. We thank the members of that organization for tebrates, F. W. Harrison and A. G. Humes, eds., vol. their many helpful comments and suggestions. We also 9, Crustacea. Pp. 25-224. Wiley-Liss, New York. thank Alicia Thompson of the University of Southern New York. California's Center for Electron Microscopy and Mi­ , and J. C. Christiansen. (In press.) A morpho­ croanalysis for assistance with the SEM portion of the logical comparison of the phyllopodous thoracic study, and Dale Stokes of the Scripps Institution of limbs of a leptostracan (Nebalia) and a spinicaudate Oceanography for the photograph used as Fig. 1. Be­ conchostracan (Leptestheria), with conmients on the cause of the superficial similarity of leptostracans to use of the term Phyllopoda as a taxonomic catego­ some branchiopod crustaceans, this work was suggest­ ry.—Canadian Journal of Zoology. ed by reviewers of, and directly supported by, U.S. -, B. E. Felgenhauer, and L. G. Abele. 1986. National Science Foundation grant number DEB- Redescription of the clam shrimp Lynceus gracili- 90200898 to J. W. Martin. cornis (Packard) (Branchiopoda, Conchostraca, Lyn- ceidae) from Florida, with notes on its biology.— LITERATURE CITED Zoologica Scripta 15: 221-232. Modlin, R. E 1991. Paranebalia belizensis, a new Bowman, T E., J. Yager, and T. M. Iliffe. 1985. Speo- species from shallow waters off Belize, Central nebalia cannoni, n. gen., n. sp., from the Caicos Is­ America (Crustacea: Malacostraca: Leptostraca).— lands, the first hypogean leptostracan (Nebaliacea: Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington Nebaliidae).—Proceedings of the Biological Society 104: 603-612. of Washington 98: 439-446. Nation, J. L. 1983. A new method using hexamelhyl- Carlton, J. X, and i. B. Geller 1993. Ecological rou­ disilazane for preparations of soft insect tissues for lette: the global transport and invasion of nonindi- scanning electron microscopy.—Stain Technology genous marine organisms.—Science 261: 78-82. 38: 347-351. Cannon, H. G. 1960. Leptostraca.—Bronns Klassen imd Ordnungen des Xierreichs 5.1.4.1: 1-40. Packard, A. S. 1883. A monograph of the phyllopod Clark, A. E. 1932. Nebalia cahoti n. sp., with obser­ Crustacea of North America, with remarks on the vations on other Nebaliacea.—Transactions of the order Phyllocarida.—In: F. V. Hayden, ed.. Twelfth Royal Society of Canada 26: 217-235. Annual Report of the U.S. Geological and Geo­ Dahl, E. 1985. Crustacea Leptostraca, principles of graphical Survey of the Territories of Wyoming and taxonomy and a revision of European shelf spe­ Idaho: a report of progress of the exploration of Wy­ cies.—Sarsia 70: 135-165. oming and Idaho for the year 1878, Part I. Pp. 295- . 1987. Malacostraca maltreated—the case of 457. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. the Phyllocarida,—Journal of Crustacean Biology 7: Reish, D. J. 1972. Marine life of southern Califor­ 721-726. nia.—D. J, Reish, publisher; distributed by Forty- Haderlie, E. C, D. R Abbott, and R. L. Caldwell. Niner Shops, Inc., California State College at Long 1980. Three other crustaceans: a copepod, a leptos­ Beach, Long Beach, California. tracan, and a stomatopod.—In: R. H. Morris, D. P. RicketLs, E. E. J. Calvin, J. Hedgepeth, and D. W. Phil­ Abbott, and E. C. Haderlie, eds., Intertidal inverte­ lips. 1985. Between Pacific tides, fifth edition.— brates of California. Chapter 26. Pp. 631-635. Stan­ Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Pp. ford University Press, Stanford, California. i-xxvi, 1-652. Hessler, R. R. 1984. Dahlella caUariensis, new ge­ Smith, R. I., and J. X Carlton. 1980. Light's manual: nus, new species: a leptostracan (Crustacea, Mala­ intertidal invertebrates of the central California costraca) from deep-sea hydrothemial vents.—Jour­ coast, third edition (with corrections) (original edi­ nal of Crustacean Biology 4: 655-664. tion with 1975 publication date).—University of 372 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 16. NO. 2, 1996

California Press, Berkeley, California. Pp. i-xvii, 1- Wageie, J. W. 1983. Nebalia marerubri, sp. nov. aus 717. dem Roten Meer (Crustacea: Phyllocarida: Leptos- Vetter, E. W. 1994. Hotspots of benthic production.— traca).—^Journal of Natural History 17: 127-138. Nature 372: 47. RECEIVED: 10 July 1995. . 1995. Southern California Nebalia: ecology, ACCEPTCD: 1 November 1995. production, natural history and systematics of two subtidal species.—^Ph.D. thesis. University of Cali­ Addresses: (JWM and CEC) Natural History Mu­ fornia, San Diego, California. Pp. 1-243. seum of Los Angeter County, 900 Exposition Boule­ . (In press.) Nebalia daytoni, n. sp., a leptos- vard, Los Angeles, California 90007, U.S.A.; (EWV) tracan from southern California (Crustacea: Phyllo- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Califor­ carida).—Crustaceana. nia 92093, U.S.A.