DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiona Rachel Gell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fiona Rachel Gell FISH AND FISHERIES IN THE SEAGRASS BEDS OF THE QUIRIMBA ARCHIPELAGO, NORTHERN MOZAMBIQUE FIONA RACHEL GELL Thesis submitted for the degree of DPhil University of York Tropical Marine Research Unit, Departmentof Biology August1999 0 Pescador Velho Pescador vindo do largo com o teu calgado de algas diz-me o que trazes no barco donde levantas a face a tua face marcada pelo sal de horas choradas da-me o teu peixe pescado bem Iä no fundo do mar -nesta ägua näo tem peixe- pescador da-me um sb peixe nem garoupa nem xareu sG -um peixinho de prata -nesta ägua näo tern peixe fol tudo procurar deus pro lado do Zanzibar. Gloria de Sant'anna, Mozambique ABSTRACT Despite being an important and widespread use of marine resources, tropical seagrass fisheries have been the subject of very few biological studies. The fish communities of tropical seagrass beds have also been little studied in comparison to the fish communities of coral reefs, which have been the subject of extensive research. Seagrass fisheries are of importance to coastal communities in developing countries because they are usually shallow and close to shore, and in many cases are more accessible than coral reefs, especially to the poorest fishers on foot or in small canoes. The importance of seagrass beds as a component of the interacting tropical coastal ecosystem (with coral communities and mangroves) is more widely recognised. Seagrass beds are often acknowledged as important nursery areas for fisheries or for their role in nutrient cycling and this is often incorporated to some extent in their management. However, the direct use value of seagrass beds as habitats for economically important species is largely ignored. The faunal diversity of seagrass systems is also something that has been studied to a limited extent. Whereas coral reefs are described as the "rainforests of the sea", seagrasses are often thought of as monospecific marine grasslands, productive but not particularly diverse. In this thesis a fishery based almost exclusively on seagrass beds is described, the seagrass beds are characterised in terms of plant species diversity, biomass and cover, and the seagrass fish communities which the fishery exploits is described. Experiments to determine the relative fish productivity and diversity in three of the main seagrass species are described, and experiments determine the efficiency of the trap fishing methods used by local fishers in the seagrass beds. Five of the most abundant species in the fishery, Siganus sutor, Leptoscarus vaigiensis, Lethrinus variegatus, Lethrinus lentjan and Gerres oyena are studied in more detail, aspects of their biology and life histories are described and are related to possible management strategies for the seagrass fishery. The seagrass fishery was found to be highly productive, to have a remarkably high species diversity and was the major single source of income to local people. The main species of fish in the fishery were found to have very different life histories and ecology, and this coupled with the high overall species diversity presents the prospective manager with the challenge of sustaining an important fishery whilst conserving habitat 1 integrity and species diversity in what is evidently an ecologically important area. Carefully selected long-term no-take zones, established in close collaboration with fishers and other members of the community, are proposed as the ideal form of management of this multi-species, multi-gear fishery. 6 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract Table of contents 3 Acknowledgements 5 Declaration 8 Introduction 9 Chapter 1: Characterisation of the fishing sites of the Montepuez Bay Abstract 14 Introduction 14 Study Site 20 Methods 20 Results 23 Discussion 36 Conclusion 46 References 47 Chapter 2: Fishing methods, effort and yiglds of an artisanal seagrass fishery at Quirimba Island, Mozambique Abstract 56 Introduction 56 Study Site 59 Methods 59 Results 62 Discussion 80 References 89 Chapter 3: The catch composition of the net and trap fisheries of the Quirimba seagrass beds Abstract 95 Introduction 95 Methods and Study Site 97 Results 99 Discussion 147 References 164 3 Chapter 4: Observations on the biology and life history of 5 important fishery species: Siganus sutor, Leptoscarus vaigiensis, Lethrinus lentjan, Lethrinus variegatus and Gerres oyena in the Quirimba Island seagrass fishery Abstract 170 Introduction 171 Study Site 172 Methods 173 Results 174 Discussion 196 Conclusion 209 References 212 Chapter 5: A comparison of fish caught in 3 species of seagrass: Enhalus acoroides, Thalassodendron ciliatum and Cymodocea spp. In the Montepuez Bay by experimental trap fishing Abstract 216 Introduction 216 Study Site 217 Methods 217 Results 219 Discussion 231 Conclusion 236 References 237 Chapter 6: The price of fish and the value of seagrass beds: socio- economic aspects of the seagrass fishery on Quirimba Island, Mozambique Abstract 240 Introduction 240 Study Site 242 Methods 244 Results and Discussion 245 Conclusion 282 References 283 Final Discussion 290 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is the result of two eventful and often disastrous periods of fieldwork based on Quirimba Island, Mozambique. On my first journey from Tanzania to the Quirimba Archipelago the boat sank and I lost virtually all my DPhil equipment, notes and books and all my personal belongings and the project's boat, radios and some diving gear were also lost. After swimming to shore on Mafia Island I had 2 days in Dar es Salaarn to buy some clothes and send some faxes then I set off again to the Quirimbas. Five weeks after leaving the UK I arrived at the project "base camp" on Quirimba to find that the camp consisted of two bamboo walls surrounded by dense bush so the first task was to build a camp for 20 people from scratch. All the other camp equipment including diving gear and the second project boat were held in customs until three months later. For those months we lived under a tarpaulin (this was still the rainy season), built the camp and huddled round one lamp and a small camp fire every evening while we waited for a the radio, generator, diving equipment and everything else to arrive. On my second fieldtrip I again arrived on Quirimba 5 weeks after having left the UK, this time spending three weeks stranded on the project's new boat in a small southern Tanzanian port waiting for a vital engine part to arrive and then a week's stormy journey down to the Quirimbas. I must thank my supervisor Dr Rupert Ormond for giving me the opportunity to risk life and limb in remote parts of East Africa through his collaborationwith the Darwin/Frontier-Mocambique Quirimba Archipelago Marine Research Programme. Without working with a large concern like the Frontier-Mocambique project I would never have been able to work in such an interesting and remote place and I thank the Society for Environmental Exploration for taking me on board. They have helped in innumerable ways. I'd like to thank the field staff I worked with in Mozambique, particularly project Research Co-ordinator Dr Mark Whittington who acted as my field supervisor and provided valuable advice, logistical support and the time of the project participants to assist in aspects of my work, Counterpart Research Co-ordinator Mario Carvalho (also of MICOA, the Ministry for the Co-ordination of Environmental Affairs, Mozambique) who introduced me to the wonders of seagrass biology and helped greatly with 5 translation and his local knowledge, and Assistant Research Co-ordinator Alex Corrie who was instrumental with Mario in setting up the collaboration with the fishermen that proved so valuable. I am extremely grateful to Mike Myers, Project Co-ordinator, who organised my Mozambican work permits, and also organised all the other bureaucratic aspects of the research and the complex logistics of life on Quirimba. The project would not have happened without him. Pete Gaunt, the project diving officer, gave generously of his time to help me undertake the dive surveys that fell outside the project work programme and provided boat support and back-up on numerous occasions. I would also like to thank other field staff Damon Stanwell-Smith and Mikey Heasman for their support. Thanks also to the Dar es Salaam office staff who kept us in touch with the outside world and helped with supplies, visas and who put me up in Dar, Frontier-Tanzania staff for accommodating me at their camp in Mtwara and London office staff. I am extremely grateful to all the Frontier volunteers and Mozambican project participants who assisted in the fisheries data collection. My biggest thank go to the people of Quirimba, particularly the fishermen of Quiwandala, who were so supportive of my work and so friendly and welcoming. I could not have undertaken this research without the interest and enthusiastic involvement of the fishers. They were generous with their time and their fish, they were patient with me and taught me so much about fish, fishing and their way of life. Special thanks to Mussa and Lamu the net fishermen who taught me a lot when I first started my research and became good friends over the time I was in Quirimba. Anibal Amade, our camp guard by night and trap fisherman by day helped me in many ways. He taught me Portuguese, vital bits of Kimwani, how to make a marema traps and how to fish them, and I couldn't have done the trap fishing experiments or sampled the trap fishery without his untiring and enthusiastic help and advice. Anibal was very interested and involved in my research and collected data from his catches when I was doing other work. I'd like to thank him for his kindness and friendship. Awaje Shale, employed by the project as a cook, was a great friend and taught me everything I know about cooking over temperamental fires and turning weevil-beans, a couple of coconuts and a selection of my study species into a meal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progress in Mediterranean Bioinvasions Two Years After the Suez Canal Enlargement
    ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER AADRAY 58(2): 347 - 358, 2017 Progress in Mediterranean bioinvasions two years after the Suez Canal enlargement Argyro ZENETOS Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, 19003 Anavissos, Greece Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] The possibility that the recent expansion of the Suez Canal could trigger an entirely new twenty first century wave of invasions was investigated. Results showed that only 19 new alien species were detected after August 2015 (date of the last Suez Canal enlargement). Five of the newcomers have already established viable populations. Between August 2015 and August 2017 approximately 9,5 new species (mostly fish) entered the Mediterranean annually, 7 of them via the Suez Canal unaided. The next most important pathway is Transport - Stowaway: Shipping, while intentional releases from aquaria appear to play an impor- tant role. Our results confirm previous findings on the decreasing rate of introductions, which is not affected by the recent expansion of the Suez Canal. Conclusively, the rate of bio invasions via the Suez Canal has not “doubled” as anticipated but rather decreased in relation to previous years. Key words: Alien species, Suez Canal, Internet screening INTRODUCTION However, a recent study revealed that from 2011 to 2016, the annual rate of MAS introductions It has been well documented that the Suez in the Mediterranean has decreased regardless Canal is the main pathway of Marine Alien of the pathway (ZENETOS et al., 2017). GALIL et al. species (MAS) introductions into the Mediterra- (2015) claimed that the recent expansion of the nean Sea (POR, 1978; GALIL, 2006; RILOV & GALIL, Suez Canal could trigger an entirely new twenty 2009; ZENETOS et al., 2012; KATSANEVAKIS et al., first century wave of invasions through a next- 2013; NUNES et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • 14B. Body Not Uniformly Coloured 22A. Light Or Dark Oblique Lines, but No
    click for previous page - 7 - FAO Sheets HAEMULIDAE Fishing Area 51 14b. Body not uniformly coloured 22a. Light or dark oblique lines, but no longitu- dinal lines or spots on body 23a. Oblique lines run downward and for- ward (Fig.22) .................................... P. paulayi Plectorhinchus paulayi Fig.22 23b. Oblique lines run downward and back- ward 19 or 20 24a. Dorsal fin rays 19 or 20; body rays grey to black with 4 narrow white crossbars (Fig.23) ...................... P. playfairi 24b. Dorsal fin rays 15 or 16; body with alternate dark and orange- reddish crossbars or stripes (Fig.16) .............................. P. plagiodesmus 22b. Body with spots and/or longitudinal stripes Plectorhinchus playfairi Fig.23 25a. Body with distinct spots 15 or 16 rays 26a. Soft dorsal fin rays 15 or 16; colour greyish brown, with large round black spots on posterior two thirds of body (Fig.24) ......................….. P. pictus 26b. Soft dorsal fin rays 17 to 22 Plectorhinchus pictus Fig.24 - 8 - FAO Sheets HAEMULIDAE Fishing Area 51 27a. Gillrakers on lower limb of first arch 22 to 24; body with numerous dark brown to black spots about as large as pupil (Fig.25) ........…. P. picus (adult) 27b. Gillrakers on lower limb of first arch 20 or less 28a. Body with orange, gold, or rust coloured spots; head with narrow, undulating yellow to rust coloured lines (Fig.26) .............................….... P. flavomaculatus Plectorhinchus picus Fig.25 (adult) 28b. Body silvery, with many black spots smaller than pupil; fins yellowish, with black spots (Fig.27) ................…...... P. gaterinus (adult) 25b. Colour pattern including large blotches, longi- tudinal stripes and/or small spots 29a.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrasting Patterns in the Abundance of Fish Communities Targeted by Fishers on Two Coral Reefs in Southern Mozambique
    1 African Journal Of Marine Science Archimer January 2020, Volume 42 Issue 1 Pages 95-107 https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2020.1731597 https://archimer.ifremer.fr https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00657/76941/ Contrasting patterns in the abundance of fish communities targeted by fishers on two coral reefs in southern Mozambique Sancelme Tonin 1, 2, 3 , Goetze J 2, 4, 5, Jaquemet S, Meekan Mg 1, 2, Flam A 6, Watts Am 6, 7, Speed Cw 1, 2 1 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia 2 Global FinPrint Project, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia 3 Université de La Réunion, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE [Tropical Marine Ecology Laboratory], Institute of Research for Development (IRD)/French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), Saint Denis, Réunion 4 Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia 5 Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA 6 Marine Megafauna Foundation, Marine Megafauna Research Center, Tofo Beach, Inhambane, Mozambique 7 Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom * Corresponding author : Tonin Sancelme, email address : [email protected] Abstract : Coastal populations of maritime countries in eastern Africa rely on fish as a primary source of protein, but baseline information on the abundance of fish communities on these coastlines is often lacking. We used baited remote underwater video stations to compare the abundance and diversity of reef fishes targeted by fishing at two sites in southern Mozambique, one at Lighthouse Reef within the Bazaruto Archipelago National Park and the other to the south at San Sebastian Reef on the San Sebastian Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Taverampe2018.Pdf
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 121 (2018) 212–223 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multilocus phylogeny, divergence times, and a major role for the benthic-to- T pelagic axis in the diversification of grunts (Haemulidae) ⁎ Jose Taveraa,b, , Arturo Acero P.c, Peter C. Wainwrightb a Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia b Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States c Instituto de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar, CECIMAR, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Caribe, El Rodadero, Santa Marta, Colombia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We present a phylogenetic analysis with divergence time estimates, and an ecomorphological assessment of the Percomorpharia role of the benthic-to-pelagic axis of diversification in the history of haemulid fishes. Phylogenetic analyses were Fish performed on 97 grunt species based on sequence data collected from seven loci. Divergence time estimation Functional traits indicates that Haemulidae originated during the mid Eocene (54.7–42.3 Ma) but that the major lineages were Morphospace formed during the mid-Oligocene 30–25 Ma. We propose a new classification that reflects the phylogenetic Macroevolution history of grunts. Overall the pattern of morphological and functional diversification in grunts appears to be Zooplanktivore strongly linked with feeding ecology. Feeding traits and the first principal component of body shape strongly separate species that feed in benthic and pelagic habitats. The benthic-to-pelagic axis has been the major axis of ecomorphological diversification in this important group of tropical shoreline fishes, with about 13 transitions between feeding habitats that have had major consequences for head and body morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fish Species (Pisces) of La Réunion, Including a Red List of Threatened and Declining Species
    Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie 2: 1–168; Stuttgart, 30.IV.2009. 1 Annotated checklist of the fish species (Pisces) of La Réunion, including a Red List of threatened and declining species RONALD FR ICKE , THIE rr Y MULOCHAU , PA tr ICK DU R VILLE , PASCALE CHABANE T , Emm ANUEL TESSIE R & YVES LE T OU R NEU R Abstract An annotated checklist of the fish species of La Réunion (southwestern Indian Ocean) comprises a total of 984 species in 164 families (including 16 species which are not native). 65 species (plus 16 introduced) occur in fresh- water, with the Gobiidae as the largest freshwater fish family. 165 species (plus 16 introduced) live in transitional waters. In marine habitats, 965 species (plus two introduced) are found, with the Labridae, Serranidae and Gobiidae being the largest families; 56.7 % of these species live in shallow coral reefs, 33.7 % inside the fringing reef, 28.0 % in shallow rocky reefs, 16.8 % on sand bottoms, 14.0 % in deep reefs, 11.9 % on the reef flat, and 11.1 % in estuaries. 63 species are first records for Réunion. Zoogeographically, 65 % of the fish fauna have a widespread Indo-Pacific distribution, while only 2.6 % are Mascarene endemics, and 0.7 % Réunion endemics. The classification of the following species is changed in the present paper: Anguilla labiata (Peters, 1852) [pre- viously A. bengalensis labiata]; Microphis millepunctatus (Kaup, 1856) [previously M. brachyurus millepunctatus]; Epinephelus oceanicus (Lacepède, 1802) [previously E. fasciatus (non Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775)]; Ostorhinchus fasciatus (White, 1790) [previously Apogon fasciatus]; Mulloidichthys auriflamma (Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775) [previously Mulloidichthys vanicolensis (non Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1831)]; Stegastes luteobrun- neus (Smith, 1960) [previously S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Red Swimming Crab (Portunus Haanii) Fishery Improvement Project (FIP) in Dongshan, China (August-December 2018)
    Chinese Red Swimming Crab (Portunus haanii) Fishery Improvement Project (FIP) in Dongshan, China (August-December 2018) Prepared by Min Liu & Bai-an Lin Fish Biology Laboratory College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University March 2019 Contents 1. Introduction........................................................................................................ 5 2. Materials and Methods ...................................................................................... 6 2.1. Study site and survey frequency .................................................................... 6 2.2. Sample collection .......................................................................................... 7 2.3. Species identification................................................................................... 10 2.4. Sample measurement ................................................................................... 11 2.5. Interviews.................................................................................................... 13 2.6. Estimation of annual capture volume of Portunus haanii ............................. 15 3. Results .............................................................................................................. 15 3.1. Species diversity.......................................................................................... 15 3.1.1. Species composition .............................................................................. 15 3.1.2. ETP species .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Movement in the Red Sea and Implications for Marine Protected Area Design
    Fish Movement in the Red Sea and Implications for Marine Protected Area Design Thesis by Irene Antonina Salinas Akhmadeeva In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia April, 2021 2 EXAMINATION COMMITTEE PAGE The thesis of Irene Antonina Salinas Akhmadeeva is approved by the examination committee. Committee Chairperson: Prof. Michael L. Berumen Committee Co-Chair: Dr. Alison Green Committee Members: Dr. Darren Coker, Prof. Rusty Brainard 3 COPYRIGHT © April 2021 Irene Antonina Salinas Akhmadeeva All Rights Reserved 4 ABSTRACT Fish Movement in the Red Sea and Implications for Marine Protected Area Design Irene Antonina Salinas Akhmadeeva The Red Sea is valued for its biodiversity and the livelihoods it provides for many. It now faces overfishing, habitat degradation, and anthropogenic induced climate-change. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) became a powerful management tool to protect vulnerable species and ecosystems, re-establish their balance, and enhance marine populations. For this, they need to be well designed and managed. There are 15 designated MPAs in the Red Sea but their level of enforcement is unclear. To design an MPA it is necessary to know if it will protect species of interest by considering their movement needs. In this thesis I aim at understanding fish movement in the Red Sea, specifically home range (HR) to inform MPA size designation. With not much empirical data available on HR for Red Sea fish, I used a Machine Learning (ML) classification model, trained with empirical literature HR measurements with Maximum Total Length (L Max), Aspect Ratio (AR) of the caudal fin, and Trophic Level as predictor variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Fishes of the Gulf of Mannar Ecosystem, Tamil Nadu, India
    Available online at: www.mbai.org.in doi: 10.6024/jmbai.2016.58.1.1895-05 Check list of fishes of the Gulf of Mannar ecosystem, Tamil Nadu, India K. K. Joshi*, Miriam Paul Sreeram, P. U. Zacharia, E. M. Abdussamad, Molly Varghese, O. M. M. J. Mohammed Habeeb1, K. Jayabalan1, K. P. Kanthan1, K. Kannan1, K. M. Sreekumar, Gimy George and M. S. Varsha ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, P. B. No.1603, Kochi - 682 018, Kerala, India. 1Tuticorin Research Centre of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Tuticorin - 628 001, Tamil Nadu, India. *Correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Received: 10 Jan 2016, Accepted: 25 Jun 2016, Published: 30 Jun 2016 Original Article Abstract Introduction Gulf of Mannar Ecosystem (GOME) covers an area spread over Rameswaram and Kanyakumari for about 19000 km2 and lies between India is blessed with a vast region of coral reefs and 78°11’E and 79°15’ E longitude and 8°49’N and 9°15’N latitude. The mangroves and these regions support very rich fauna of flora 21 coral islands form a network of habitats for different kinds of fishes and constitute rich biodiversity of marine organisms. Gulf and marine organisms. Fish samples were collected during April 2005 of Mannar Ecosystem (GOME) covers an area spread over to March 2010 from different centers viz., Vembar, Tharuvaikulam, Rameswaram and Kanyakumari to about 19,000 km2. GOME Vellapatti, Therespuram, Tuticorin, Alangarathattu, Pazhaykayal, lies between 78°11’00” E and 79°15’00” E longitude and Punnakayal, Kayalpattinam, Veerapandiapattinam, Thiruchendur and 8°49’00” N and 9°15’00” N latitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Chumbe Island Management Plan 2017-2027
    CHUMBE ISLAND rd 3 Ten Year Management Plan 2017 - 2027 This document is the third ten-year management plan for Chumbe Island Coral Park in Zanzibar, Tanzania. The two previous management plans covered the periods of 1995 to 2005, and 2006 to 2016 respectively. 2027 Goal The Chumbe Island Coral Reef Sanctuary and Closed Forest Reserve are effectively and sustainably managed in order to maximize their contribution to biodiversity conservation, serve as a model for effective ecotourism and MPA management, and provide a platform to promote wider environmental awareness for sustainable development and ecological stewardship in Zanzibar. Produced with support from: Sustainable Solutions International Consulting (SSIC) 2 Published by: Chumbe Island Coral Park (CHICOP) Citation: CHICOP (2017) 3rd Ten Year Management Plan for Chumbe Island Coral Park. Photos & images: Citations provided throughout document where required. All images permissible for use through creative commons or associated licensing, and/or direct owner consent. Cover photo: © CHICOP Design & layout: Sustainable Solutions International Consulting Available from: CHICOP, Zanzibar, Tanzania. E: [email protected] T: +255 (0) 242 231 040 3rd Ten Year Management Plan 2017 – 2027 Chumbe Island Coral Park 3 Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 6 Figures ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marine and Estuarine Fish Fauna of Tamil Nadu, India
    Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 8(4): 231-271 Article Marine and estuarine fish fauna of Tamil Nadu, India 1,2 3 1 1 H.S. Mogalekar , J. Canciyal , D.S. Patadia , C. Sudhan 1Fisheries College and Research Institute, Thoothukudi - 628 008, Tamil Nadu, India 2College of Fisheries, Dholi, Muzaffarpur - 843 121, Bihar, India 3Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata - 700 120, West Bengal, India E-mail: [email protected] Received 20 June 2018; Accepted 25 July 2018; Published 1 December 2018 Abstract Varied marine and estuarine ecosystems of Tamil Nadu endowed with diverse fish fauna. A total of 1656 fish species under two classes, 40 orders, 191 families and 683 geranra reported from marine and estuarine waters of Tamil Nadu. In the checklist, 1075 fish species were primary marine water and remaining 581 species were diadromus. In total, 128 species were reported under class Elasmobranchii (11 orders, 36 families and 70 genera) and 1528 species under class Actinopterygii (29 orders, 155 families and 613 genera). The top five order with diverse species composition were Perciformes (932 species; 56.29% of the total fauna), Tetraodontiformes (99 species), Pleuronectiforms (77 species), Clupeiformes (72 species) and Scorpaeniformes (69 species). At the family level, the Gobiidae has the greatest number of species (86 species), followed by the Carangidae (65 species), Labridae (64 species) and Serranidae (63 species). Fishery status assessment revealed existence of 1029 species worth for capture fishery, 425 species worth for aquarium fishery, 84 species worth for culture fishery, 242 species worth for sport fishery and 60 species worth for bait fishery.
    [Show full text]
  • DACTYL 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) DACTYLOPTERIDAE * Flying Gurnards Moderately
    click for previous page DACTYL 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) DACTYLOPTERIDAE * Flying gurnards Moderately elongate fishes, with heavily armored heads. Head large; mouth small, subterminal, protractile; teeth minute, nodular or absent; eyes large; a small movable bone between plate-like bones around eye and preopercle; preopercle with a prominent elongate spine; gill openings restricted, and fused to isthmus. Spinous and soft parts of dorsal fins separated by a deep notch and a short spinous point, total number of spines 6 or 7, of which the first or the first two anterior ones are separated from the remainder of the fin; soft part of dorsal fin with 8 rays; anal fin with 6 or 7 soft rays; bases of pectoral fins horizontal, these fins divided into 2 sections, a short anterior part, with 5 rays, and a long posterior part, with 25 to 31 rays which reach to caudal fin base in adults; caudal fin emarginate; lower side of posterior part of trunk with 2 to 4 enlarged, keel-like scales. Scales scute-like, forming prominent keels. Lateral line present or absent (obscured by scute-like scales); if present, it extends to near base of caudal fin. Colour: usually dusky red or purple with brown spots above, pinkish or whitish below; upper surface of pectoral fins brightly coloured, usually bluish, with dark brown and often whitish spots. Small to moderate-sized marine, bottom-living fishes. Adults reach 40 cm and forage on the bottom using the anterior part of the pectoral fins to search for food.
    [Show full text]
  • HAEM Plect 8 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FAMILY
    click for previous page HAEM Plect 8 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FISHING AREA 51 FAMILY: HAEMULIDAE (W. Indian Ocean) Plectorhinchus gaterinus (Forsskål, 1775) OTHER SCIENTIFIC NAMES STILL IN USE: Gaterin gaterinus (Forsskål, 1775) VERNACULAR NAMES: FAO : En - Blackspotted rubberlip Fr – Diagramme moucheté Sp - Burro punteado NATIONAL: juvenile 6 pores DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS: Lips fleshy but not swollen; chin with 6 pores but no median pit; gillrakers on first arch 26 or 27 (8 on upper limb, 1 at corner and 17 or 18 on lower limb). Dorsal fin with 13 spines and 19 or 20 soft rays; pelvic fins longer than pectoral fins. Scales ctenoid rough to touch). Lateral line with about 55 to 60 tubed scales. Colour: yellowish grey, back greenish and belly yellowish, with rows of dark grey or black-brown spots on body and fins. Juveniles pale silver-grey with yellow fins and 5 to 7 brown longitudinal bands which break into lines of spots at 10 to 12 cm standard underside of head length. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERS OF SIMILAR SPECIES OCCURRING IN THE AREA: Plectorhinchus orientalis: also has 13 spines in dorsal fin and could be easily mistaken with the juve- niles of P. gaterinus which have brown longitudinal bars on body and head, but can be distinguished by the 17 or 18 soft dorsal fin rays (19 or 20 in P. gaterinus) and 20 to 23 gillrakers an lover limb of, first arch (17 or 18 in P. gaterinus). P. flavomaculatus: body with orange, gold or rust coloured spots disappearing with growth; head with yellow stripes; gillrakers on upper limb of first arch 11 to 14 (8 in P.
    [Show full text]