Download Ships Named for Significant Military Or Naval Events
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
US Navy and Coast Guard Vessels, Sunk Or Damaged Beyond
Casualties: U.S. Navy and Coast Guard Vessels, Sunk or Damaged Beyond Repair during World War II, 7 December 1941-1 October 1945 U.S. Navy Warships Mine Warfare Ships Patrol Ships Amphibious Ships Auxiliaries District Craft U.S. Coast Guard Ships Bibliography U.S. Navy Warships Battleship (BB) USS Arizona (BB-39) destroyed by Japanese aircraft bombs at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 7 December 1941, and stricken from the Navy List, 1 December 1942. USS Oklahoma (BB-37) capsized and sank after being torpedoed by Japanese aircraft at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 7 December 1941. Aircraft Carrier (CV) USS Hornet (CV-8) sunk after being torpedoed by Japanese aircraft during the Battle of Santa Cruz, Solomon Islands, 26 October 1942. USS Lexington (CV-2) sunk after being torpedoed by Japanese aircraft during the Battle of the Coral Sea, 8 May 1942. USS Wasp (CV-7) sunk after being torpedoed by Japanese submarine I-19 south of Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands, 15 September 1942. USS Yorktown (CV-5) damaged by aircraft bombs on 4 June 1942 during the Battle of Midway and sunk after being torpedoed by Japanese submarine I-168, 7 June 1942. Aircraft Carrier, Small (CVL) USS Princeton (CVL-23) sunk after being bombed by Japanese aircraft during the Battle of Leyte Gulf, Philippine Islands, 24 October 1944. Aircraft Carrier, Escort (CVE) USS Bismarck Sea (CVE-95) sunk by Kamikaze aircraft off Iwo Jima, Volcano Islands, 21 February 1945. USS Block Island (CVE-21) sunk after being torpedoed by German submarine U-549 northwest of the Canary Islands, 29 May 1944. -
WW2 – Guadalcanal Campaign
Guadalcanal 1942-43 COL Mark D. Harris 5 Dec 2013 Objectives • Learn about the Guadalcanal campaign. • Identify and discuss good and poor decisions and actions made by both sides during the campaign. • Draw parallels between their experience and modern military experience, especially military medicine. • Teach others the lessons learned. Strategic Situation - Allied • “Germany first” policy – 70% of US resources were against Germany, only 30% against Japan. • US did not have land, sea or air parity with Japan but was getting close to it. • US needed to support Australia because they were in danger and because Australia provided a bulwark against Japan in the Pacific. • Coast watchers in the Solomon Islands provided early notice of Japanese sea and air movements. Axis Division of the World (as considered in January 1942) Strategic Situation - Japanese • Recently lost four carriers at the Battle of Midway, their first major setback of the war. • Goal was to capture the major allied base at Port Moresby in New Guinea, thereby threatening Australia. • IJN wanted to occupy Guadalcanal to interdict US delivery of troops and supplies from Hawaii to Australia. • IJA wanted to concentrate forces for Port Moresby operation. Battle for Port Moresby 1942 Kokoda Track Operational Situation - Guadalcanal • Island in the Solomon chain 90 miles long and 25 miles wide. • No natural harbors, and south coast covered by coral reefs so only approach by sea is from the north. • Topography – mountains to 8000 feet, dormant volcanos, steep ravines, deep streams, and jungle. • Public Health threats – malaria, dengue, fungal, heat injury. • British protectorate since 1893 – Natives generally expected to be friendly. -
The American and Japanese Navies As Hypothetical
BIG STICK AI\70 SHORT SWORD: THE AMERICAN AND JAPANESE NAVIES AS HYPOTHETICAL ENEMIES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Carlos R. Rivera, B.A., M.A ***** The Ohio State University 1995 Dissertation Committee : Approved by J.F. Guilmartin, Jr. a <—- J.R. Bartholomew A v \(,/i ( I ^ Adviser^ P.L. Hahn Dep^tm^t of History ÜMI Number: 9534057 Copyright 1995 by Rivera, Carlos Rafael All rights reserved. DMI Microform 9534057 Copyright 1995, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Copyright by Carlos R. Rivera 1995 To my Father, Carlos Rivera DeJesus Sargeant First Class (ret.) U.S. Army Who taught me that honor, duty, and courage are so much more than political expediency 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express my most sincere and grateful appreciation for the professional contributions I received. For John F. Guilmartin, Jr., I very much want to recognize the patient guidance and support I received during the last few years. Grateful thanks go to the other members of my committee, James R. Bartholomew and Peter L. Hahn, and Frederick J. Milford. Other persons who have been most helpful include Otsubo Sumiko and Sendai Kenzo, both of The Ohio State University, Yamamoto Masahiro, University of Alabama, and Sebastian Dobson, Tokyo. I want to recognize the Ohio State University Main Library, especially, Ms. Maureen Donovan for help with Japanese texts, and the staff of the Inter-Library Loan office for their valued assistance. -
Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Updated October 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. Section 1749 of the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (S. 1790/P.L. 116-92 of December 20, 2019) prohibits the Secretary of Defense, in naming a new ship (or other asset) or renaming an existing ship (or other asset), from giving the asset a name that refers to, or includes a term referring to, the Confederate States of America, including any name referring to a person who served or held leadership within the Confederacy, or a Confederate battlefield victory. The provision also states that “nothing in this section may be construed as requiring a Secretary concerned to initiate a review of previously named assets.” Section 1749 of the House-reported FY2021 NDAA (H.R. 6395) would prohibit the public display of the Confederate battle flag on Department of Defense (DOD) property, including naval vessels. -
National Defense
National Defense of 32 code PARTS 700 TO 799 Revised as of July 1, 1999 CONTAINING A CODIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE EFFECT AS OF JULY 1, 1999 regulations With Ancillaries Published by the Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration as a Special Edition of the Federal Register federal VerDate 18<JUN>99 04:37 Jul 24, 1999 Jkt 183121 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 8091 Sfmt 8091 Y:\SGML\183121F.XXX 183121f PsN: 183121F 1 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1999 For sale by U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402±9328 VerDate 18<JUN>99 04:37 Jul 24, 1999 Jkt 183121 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 8092 Sfmt 8092 Y:\SGML\183121F.XXX 183121f PsN: 183121F ?ii Table of Contents Page Explanation ................................................................................................ v Title 32: Subtitle AÐDepartment of Defense (Continued): Chapter VIÐDepartment of the Navy ............................................. 5 Finding Aids: Table of CFR Titles and Chapters ....................................................... 533 Alphabetical List of Agencies Appearing in the CFR ......................... 551 List of CFR Sections Affected ............................................................. 561 iii VerDate 18<JUN>99 00:01 Aug 13, 1999 Jkt 183121 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 8092 Sfmt 8092 Y:\SGML\183121F.XXX pfrm04 PsN: 183121F Cite this Code: CFR To cite the regulations in this volume use title, part and section num- ber. Thus, 32 CFR 700.101 refers to title 32, part 700, section 101. iv VerDate 18<JUN>99 04:37 Jul 24, 1999 Jkt 183121 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 8092 Sfmt 8092 Y:\SGML\183121F.XXX 183121f PsN: 183121F Explanation The Code of Federal Regulations is a codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the Executive departments and agen- cies of the Federal Government. -
The Solomon Islands Campaign (Guadalcanal) Location: Guadalcanal / Solomon Islands (South Pacific) Guadalcanaldate: August 7, 1942–February 8, 1943
OVERVIEW ESSAY: The Solomon Islands CampaignThe Solomon Islands Campaign (Guadalcanal) Location: Guadalcanal / Solomon Islands (South Pacific) GuadalcanalDate: August 7, 1942–February 8, 1943 (From the Collection of The National WWII Museum, 2002.069.144.) Following its attack on Pearl Harbor (December 7, THE BATTLES 1941), the Japanese Imperial Navy occupied islands American forces first landed on the Solomon Islands throughout the western Pacific Ocean. Japan’s goal of Guadalcanal, Tulagi, and Florida on the morning was to create a defensive buffer against attack from of August 7, 1942. After some fierce fighting, the US the United States and its allies—one that would ensure Marines cleared Tulagi and Florida by August 9. The Japan mastery over east Asia and the southwest Pacific. main forces on Guadalcanal met little resistance on After the US strategic victories at the Battles of the Coral their way inland to secure the airfield at Lunga Point, Sea (May 7–8, 1942) and Midway (June 4–7, 1942), the which was soon renamed Henderson Field after Lofton Japanese Imperial Navy was no longer capable of major Henderson, an aviator killed at the Battle of Midway. offensive campaigns, which permitted the Allies to start Almost immediately, however, Japanese naval aircraft their own offensive in the Pacific. attacked transport and escort ships, and Japanese In August 1942, America mounted its first major reinforcements arrived in the area. amphibious landing of World War II at Guadalcanal, Over the following days, the first of many deadly naval using innovative landing craft built by Higgins Industries battles occurred—the Naval Battle of Savo Island. -
Marine Modelling Revisited 26 USN Dreadnought Battleships
REVISITED Marine Modelling International magazine ran from October 1985 to August 2017 for a total of 365 issues with 240 ‘Waterlines’ articles including in the first and last issues. Beginning in 2011 many of these articles were gathered together in various ‘Waterlines – Revisited’ pdfs providing the opportunity to re-read some of those early and not so early articles virtually as they were. This final pdf combines a series of unpublished articles originally planned for late 2017/early 2018, their subject being the United States Navy’s Dreadnought Battleships. Additional pictures & information have been included. 26: USN Dreadnought Battleships Early Dreadnoughts .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Notes on the Waterlines ........................................................................................................................................... 2 South Carolina Class ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Delaware Class ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Wyoming Class ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 New York Class ...................................................................................................................................................... -
From the Director's Chair
Newsletter of the Battleship Texas Foundation Winter 2018 In this issue . From The Director’s Chair The Directors Chair Pg1 As 2018 draws to its close I wanted to let FTV Report Pg3 you all know that it has been a very productive OEP Report Pg4 year for The Battleship Texas. Earlier this month OEP Update Pg5 Phase II of structural Curators Corner Pg6 repairs were completed by Taylor Marine. Phase In Memory Of Pg7 I and Phase II structural repairs represent a total investment of approximately $39 Membership Forms Pg8 million dollars. These much-needed repairs put The Texas in a much-improved condition. I have included a few photographs to give just a hint of the magnitude of the work. We have also been hosting a number of Navy Poster . events around the State of Texas that we have called Come and Save It. We have had really great turn outs and we have had thousands of people sign on to our petition to save The Texas. Again, I am including a few photographs for you to see. Finally, I am happy to share with you that after a lot of effort we believe that shortly we will be able to offer an audio tour of The Texas. I especially want to Thank TPWD and Shell Oil for their efforts to make this dream a reality. From all of us at The Battleship Texas Foundation we wish for you and your family a wonderful holiday season. Thank you for all of your support in the past. continued on next page Battleship TEXAS Foundation From The Director’s Chair continued Advisory Directors Hon. -
The Evolution of the US Navy Into an Effective
The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeff T. Reardon August 2008 © 2008 Jeff T. Reardon All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 by JEFF T. REARDON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Marvin E. Fletcher Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT REARDON, JEFF T., Ph.D., August 2008, History The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942-1943 (373 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Marvin E. Fletcher On the night of August 8-9, 1942, American naval forces supporting the amphibious landings at Guadalcanal and Tulagi Islands suffered a humiliating defeat in a nighttime clash against the Imperial Japanese Navy. This was, and remains today, the U.S. Navy’s worst defeat at sea. However, unlike America’s ground and air forces, which began inflicting disproportionate losses against their Japanese counterparts at the outset of the Solomon Islands campaign in August 1942, the navy was slow to achieve similar success. The reason the U.S. Navy took so long to achieve proficiency in ship-to-ship combat was due to the fact that it had not adequately prepared itself to fight at night. -
Hydrography, the Marine Environment, and the Culture of Nautical Charts in the United States Navy, 1838-1903
CONTROLLING THE GREAT COMMON: HYDROGRAPHY, THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT, AND THE CULTURE OF NAUTICAL CHARTS IN THE UNITED STATES NAVY, 1838-1903 A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Jason W. Smith August 2012 Examining Committee Members: Gregory J.W. Urwin, Temple University Beth Bailey, Temple University Andrew C. Isenberg, Temple University John B. Hattendorf, United States Naval War College i © Copyright 2012 by Jason W. Smith All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertation uses hydrography as a lens to examine the way the United States Navy has understood, used, and defined the sea during the nineteenth century. It argues, broadly, that naval officers and the charts and texts they produced framed the sea as a commercial space for much of the nineteenth century, proceeding from a scientific ethos that held that the sea could be known, ordered, represented, and that it obeyed certain natural laws and rules. This proved a powerful alternative to existing maritime understandings, in which mariners combined navigational science with folkloric ideas about how the sea worked. Hydrography was an important aspect of the American maritime commercial predominance in the decades before the Civil War. By the end of the century, however, new strategic ideas, technologies, and the imperatives of empire caused naval officers and hydrographers to think about the sea in new ways. After the Spanish-American War of 1898, the Navy pursued hydrography with increased urgency, faced with defending the waters of a vast new oceanic empire. Surveys, charts, and the language of hydrography became central to the Navy’s war planning and war gaming, to the strategic debate over where to establish naval bases, and, ultimately, it figured significantly in determining the geography of the American empire. -
Iwo Jima: Forgotten Valor US Wartime Posters
U.S. Wartime Posters Primary Source Adventures: Iwo Jima: Forgotten Valor Office of War Information. Enemy Ears Are Listening. Illus. by Ralph Illigan. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1942. (OWI Poster No.5). (PR 32.5015:5; Poster, 14” x 26”). U.S. War Department Public Relations Bureau. We’ll Lick’em, Just Give Us The Metal! Illus. by Ronald McLeod. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1943. (Army Official Poster). (W 107.8: M 56/3; Poster; 40” x 29”). University of North Texas Libraries A U.S. war loan poster Primary Source Adventures: Iwo Jima: Forgotten Valor U.S. Treasury Department. War Finance Division. Next! Japan, 6th War Loan. Illus. by Bingham. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1944. (WFD 958-A). (T 66.8: W 19/15; Poster 28” x 20”). University of North Texas Libraries Lindberg’s enlistment Primary Source Adventures: Iwo Jima: Forgotten Valor U.S. Navy Department. Marine Corps. Land with the U.S. Marines: Apply or Write, to Nearest Recruiting Station. Illus. by Vic Guinness. Philadelphia: McCandlish Litho Corporation, 1942. (Poster, 40” x 28”) From Charles W. Lindberg, Oral History Collection University of North Texas Libraries Primary Training for the invasion of Iwo Jima Source Adventures: Iwo Jima: Forgotten Valor From Charles W. Lindberg, Oral History Collection University of North Texas Libraries Primary Source Adventures: Iwo Jima: Forgotten Valor George W. Garand & Truman R. Strobridge. Western Pacific Operations: History of the U.S. Marine Corps Operations in World War II Vol. IV (Washington D.C. Historical Division HQ, U.S. -
Barbary Pirates: Thomas Jefferson, William Eaton, and the Evolution of U.S
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2013 Barbary Pirates: Thomas Jefferson, William Eaton, and the Evolution of U.S. Diplomacy in the Mediterranean Patrick N. Teye East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Teye, Patrick N., "Barbary Pirates: Thomas Jefferson, William Eaton, and the Evolution of U.S. Diplomacy in the Mediterranean" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1183. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1183 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Barbary Pirates: Thomas Jefferson, William Eaton, and the Evolution of U.S. Diplomacy in the Mediterranean A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History by Patrick Nartey Teye August 2013 Dinah Mayo-Bobee, PhD, Chair Melvin Page, PhD Daryl Carter, PhD John Rankin Keywords: William Eaton, Thomas Jefferson, Yusef Caramanli, Hamet Caramanli, Piracy, Barbary, Mediterranean, Diplomacy, Tributes, Treaties, Tripolitan War, North Africa ABSTRACT Barbary Pirates: Thomas Jefferson, William Eaton, and the Evolution of U.S. Diplomacy in the Mediterranean by Patrick Nartey Teye This study analyzes U.S. relations with the Barbary States from 1784 to 1805.