DOCSLIB.ORG

Pictorial Handbook on COMMON DRAGON and DAMSEL FLIES (ODONATA: INSECTA) of Mangroves of Sundarbans, India

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pictorial Handbook on COMMON DRAGON and DAMSEL FLIES (ODONATA: INSECTA) of Mangroves of Sundarbans, India Pictorial Handbook on COMMON DRAGON AND DAMSEL FLIES (ODONATA: INSECTA) of mangroves of Sundarbans, India AMITMITRA Department of Zoology, Royal University ofBhutan, Sherubtse College, Kanglung, Bhutan AND BULGANIN MITRA Zoological Survey of India. M-Block. New Alipore, Kolkata 700 053 Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Mitra, Amit and Bulganin Mitra. 2009. Pictorial Handbook on Dragon and Damsel flies (Odonata : Insecta) of mangroves of Sunderbans, India: 1-56. (Published by the Director, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata) Published : May, 2009 ISBN 978-=81-8171-220-2 © Govt. of India, 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which, it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incorrect and should be unacceptable. PRICE Indian Rs. 350.00 Foreign : $ 25; £ 20 Published at the Publication Division by the Director Zoological Survey of India, 2341 4, Ale Bose Road, 2nd MSO Building, 13th floor, Nizam Palace, Kolkata 700020 and printed at Mis Shiva Offset Press, Dehradun - 248 001 (Uttarakhand). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Dr. Ramakrishna, Director, Zoological survey of India for his kind permission for the present project and for providing all possible facilities. Shri Rati Ram Verma, Production and Publication Officer and his staff deserves our sincere thanks for their whole hearted cooperation and technical support in the publication of this handbook. We are indebted to Mr. Keith Wilson of Hong Kong for the photograph of Macrodiplax cora, Mr. Oleg Kosterin for Pseudagrion australasiae, Mr. Michael Wolf, Technical Consultant, Cypher International Ltd, Rm. 2901, Saxon Tower, Hong Kong for lschnura senegalensis, Mr. Phil Benstead Ornithological and Editorial services, The Old Stables, Church Street, Reepham, Norwich NR 10 4JW for Bradinopyga geminata and Mr. Yong San of Singapore for the photograph of Lathrecista a. asiatica. Special thanks are due to the scientists and staff of Odonata section for their untiring support during the study period. Finally we would like to acknowledge the continuous encouragement provided by Prof. Henri Dumont, Ecology lab, University of Ghent, Belgium in bringing out the current handbook. Amit Mitra and Bulganin Mitra CONTENTS Acknolvledgements ................................................................................................................. iii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 GENERAL MORPHOLOGY .................................................................................................. 4 HABIT, HABITAT AND BEHAVIOURAL PATTERNS ...................................................... 9 ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE ............................................................................................... 12 SYSTEMATIC LIST ............................................................................................................ 12 FIELD IDENTIFICATION .................................................................................................. 15 CLOSED WING POND DAMSELFLIES ......................................................................... 15 Superfamily COENAGRIONOIDEA ................................................................................ 15 Family COENAGRIONIDAE ............................................................................................ 15 Subfalnily PSEUDAGRIONINAE ..................................................................................... 15 Genus Ceriagriol' ........................................................................................................... 15 1. Ceriagrion cerinorubellum (Brauer, 1865) ...................................................... 16 2. Ceriagrion coromandelianum (Fabricius, 1798) ............................................. 17 Genus Pseudagrion ........................................................................................................ 18 3. Pseudagrion australasiae Selys, 1876 .............................................................. 18 4. Pseudagrion decorum (Rambur, 1842) ............................................................. 19 Subfamily COENAGRIONINAE ....................................................................................... 20 Genus Cercion ................................................................................................................ 20 5. Cercion malayanum (Selys, 1876) .................................................................... 20 Subfamily ISCHNURINAE ................................................................................................ 21 Genus /schllura ............................................................................................................... 21 6. Ischnura senegalensis (Rambur, 1842) .................................................................. 22 7. Ischnura aurora aurora (Brauer, 1865) ................................................................. 23 Subfamily AGRIOCNEMIDINAE ..................................................................................... 24 Genus Agriocllell1is ........................................................................................................ 24 8. Agriocllelnis pyglnaea (Rambur, 1842) .................................................................. 24 VI Subfamily ARGIINAE ........................................................................................................ 25 Genus Onychargia .......................................................................................................... 25 9. Onychargia atrocyana Selys, 1865 ................................................................... 25 ANGLE WING CLUB-TAILS ........................................................................................... 26 Superfamily AESHNOIDEA .............................................................................................. 26 Family GOMPHIDAE ......................................................................................................... 26 Subfamily LINDENIINAE ................................................................................................ 26 Genus Ictinogomphus .................................................................................................... 26 10. /ctinogomphus rapax (Rambur, 1842) ............................................................ 27 DIPPERS AND PERCHERS ............................................................................................. 28 Superfamily LIBELLULOIDEA ........................................................................................ 28 Family LIBELLULIDAE ..................................................................................................... 28 Subfamily BRACHYDIPLACTINAE ................................................................................ 28 Genus Brachydiplax ....................................................................................................... 28 11. Brachydiplax sobrina (Rambur, 1842) ........................................................... 29 Subfamily LIBELLULINAE ............................................................................................... 30 Genus Lathrecista .......................................................................................................... 30 12. Lathrecista asiatica asiatica (Fabricius, 1798) ............................................ 30 Genus Orthetrum ........................................................................................................... 31 13. Orthetrum sabina sabina (Drury, 1770) ........................................................ 32 Subfamily SYMPETRINAE .............................................................................................. 33 Genus Acisoma ............................................................................................................... 33 14. Acisoma panorpoides panorpoides Rambur, 1842 ....................................... 33 Genus Brachythemis ...................................................................................................... 34 15. Brachythemis contaminata (Fabricius, 1793) ............................................... 35 Genus Bradinopyga ........................................................................................................ 36 16. Bradinopyga geminata (Rambur, 1842) ........................................................ 36 Genus Crocothemis ........................................................................................................ 37 17. Crocothemis servilia servilia (Drury, 1770) ................................................. 37 vi i Genus Diplacodes ........................................................................................................... 39 18. Diplacodes trivialis (Rambur, 1842) .............................................................. 39 Genus Neurothenlis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zorotypidae of Fiji (Zoraptera)
    NUMBER 91, 42 pages 15 March 2006 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS FIJI ARTHROPODS VII NEAL L. EVENHUIS AND DANIEL J. BICKEL, EDITORS 7 BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu- RESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin series (ISSN 0005-9439) was begun PUBLICATIONS OF in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research in many scientific fields throughout the Pacific. In 1987, the Bulletin series BISHOP MUSEUM was superceded by the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (ISSN 0893-3111) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (ISSN 0893-3138) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (ISSN 0893-3146) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (ISSN 0893-312X) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (ISSN 1548-9620) Bishop Museum Press also publishes Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (ISSN 0893-1348), a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi- cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchang- ing publications may also contact the Bishop Museum Press for more information. BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History ISSN 0893-1348 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © 2007 by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA FIJI ARTHROPODS Editors’ Preface We are pleased to present the seventh issue of Fiji Arthropods, a series offering rapid pub- lication and devoted to studies of terrestrial arthropods of the Fiji Group and nearby Pacific archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: Taxonomy and Distribution. Progress Report for 2009 Surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D
    International Dragonfly Fund - Report 26 (2010): 1-36 1 The Superfamily Calopterygoidea in South China: taxonomy and distribution. Progress Report for 2009 surveys Zhang Haomiao* *PH D student at the Department of Entomology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Email: [email protected] Introduction Three families in the superfamily Calopterygoidea occur in China, viz. the Calo- pterygidae, Chlorocyphidae and Euphaeidae. They include numerous species that are distributed widely across South China, mainly in streams and upland running waters at moderate altitudes. To date, our knowledge of Chinese spe- cies has remained inadequate: the taxonomy of some genera is unresolved and no attempt has been made to map the distribution of the various species and genera. This project is therefore aimed at providing taxonomic (including on larval morphology), biological, and distributional information on the super- family in South China. In 2009, two series of surveys were conducted to Southwest China-Guizhou and Yunnan Provinces. The two provinces are characterized by karst limestone arranged in steep hills and intermontane basins. The climate is warm and the weather is frequently cloudy and rainy all year. This area is usually regarded as one of biodiversity “hotspot” in China (Xu & Wilkes, 2004). Many interesting species are recorded, the checklist and photos of these sur- veys are reported here. And the progress of the research on the superfamily Calopterygoidea is appended. Methods Odonata were recorded by the specimens collected and identified from pho- tographs. The working team includes only four people, the surveys to South- west China were completed by the author and the photographer, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • ON a COLLECTION of ODONATA from MANIPUR with NEW RECORDS by A
    be. 1001. Sur,. India, 72: 409--418, 1971 ON A COLLECTION OF ODONATA FROM MANIPUR WITH NEW RECORDS By A. R. LAHIRI Zoological Survey of lndia~ Shillong (With 1 Text-figure) INTRODUCTION Manipur state of the Indian Union is situated on the Indo-Burma frontier. The state is mostly covered with hill ranges having an average altitude of 200 M, surrounding a large central basin. Present study is based on a fairly good collection of odonata from the state present in the Eastern Regional Station, Zoological Survey of India, made in two successive years 1974 and 1975. Collection localities are mostly aiound Loktak lake in the south-east corner of the central basin and in the hilly regions further south around Churachandpur and Singant. The only odonate (sub) species so far reported from Manipur is lschnura ruJost;gma annandalei LajdJaw by Bhasin (1953). Present study reveals the existence of 22 odonate species and subspecies in the state, II of which are Oriental, the rest, having four Ethiopian ee­ presentatives, have a wider distribution in Palaearctic and Australian regions. Collection localities and distribution of all the 22 species and subspecies have been given in the text along with taxonomic notes for some of them and additional description of the inadequately known su bspecies lschnura rufostigma annandalei Laidlaw. SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT Suborder ZYGOPTERA Family PLATYCNEMIDIDAE Copera annulata (Selys, 1863) Material examined.-l d; 11 Km from Moirang on Churachandpur load, coIl. A. R. Lahiri, I 9.iii.l 974. Length : J abd.+app. 36.5, hindwing 23.0 mm; postnodaJs: fore­ wing 16, hindwing 14.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Chromosomes in the Indian Dragonflies
    Title A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CHROMOSOMES IN THE INDIAN DRAGONFLIES Author(s) ASANA, J. J.; MAKINO, Sajiro Citation 北海道帝國大學理學部紀要, 4(2), 67-86 Issue Date 1935-08 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/26978 Type bulletin (article) File Information 4(2)_P67-86.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CHROMOSOMES 1 IN THE INDIAN DRAGONFLIES ) BY J. J. ASANA Gujarat College, Ahmedabad, India AND Sajiro MAKINO Hokkaido Imperial University, Sapporo, Japan Introduction Barring the pioneer work of OGUMA (,15, '30, '32) and a paper by SMITH (,16) singularly few investigators have devoted their at­ tention to chromosome studies on this very ancient order of insects, Odonata. In a paper published by OGUMA and ASANA ('32) atten­ tion was drawn to a very interesting observation, whose significance is not yet quite clear, that the m-chromosome presents every grade of size reduction among testicular cells of a single individual be­ longing to a species of Odonata, Tramea chinensis, collected in the vicinity of Gujarat College, Ahmedabad, about 300 miles north of Bombay, Western India. This observed fact of size gradation of the m-chromosome in the testicular cells of a single specimen of the dragonfly, T. chinensis, coupled with the fact that one of us happened to be transferred on duty to a place farther south, nearer Bombay, to a locality richer in dragonfly fauna, acted as a stimulus for collecting additional material for further investigation. However, it must at once be admitted that the account presented in this paper throws little light, if any, on the bearing of this remarkable fact, upon the taxonomic studies 1) Contribution No.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Odonata: Libellulidae)
    Fragmenta entomologica, 46 (1-2): 121-124 (2014) ISSN: 0429-288X Short scientific note Diplacodes lefebvrii in Sardinia, a new species for the Italian fauna (Odonata: Libellulidae) Andrea RATTU 1,*, Piero LEO 2, Raynald MORATIN 3, Sönke HARDERSEN 4 1 Via del Pozzetto 1, I-09126 Cagliari, Italy - [email protected] 2 Via Tola 21, I-09128 Cagliari, Italy - [email protected] 3 Rue de la Patrie 30c, F-67300 Strasbourg-Schiltigheim, France - [email protected] 4 MiPAAF - National Forest Service, National Centre for Forestry Biodiversity “Bosco Fontana” - Strada Mantova 29, I-46045 Marmi- rolo (Mantova), Italy - [email protected] * Corresponding author Abstract Diplacodes lefebvrii (Rambur, 1842) is a libellulid dragonfly, which is common and widespread in Africa and across the Indian Ocean. While this species is fairly common in the south and east of the Mediterranean, its European range is confined to Cyprus, the island of Rhodes and the south of the Iberian Peninsula. Here we report the first record of D. lefebvrii for Italy, which was captured near Cagli- ari (Sardinia) on 11.IX.2013. In October 2014, a population of the same species was observed at a small wetland on the island “Isola di San Pietro” (Sardinia). Here the observed sex ratio of D. lefebvrii was strongly biased in favour of females and only a single male was observed. Key words: Diplacodes lefebvrii, Libellulidae, Odonata, Sardinia, Italy. Introduction fonscolombii (Selys, 1840) and Brachythemis impartita (Karsch, 1890). The individual of D. lefebvrii which was Diplacodes lefebvrii (Rambur, 1842), a libellulid dragon- discovered around 11.00 am on a sunny but windy day, fly, is common throughout Africa, widespread across the was clearly disturbed by the wind and preferred to rest on Indian Ocean and reaches into Eurasia and Europe (Dijk- the vegetation, and only flew up when approached.
    [Show full text]
  • Pagan Island, Mariana Islands
    Aquatic Insect Surveys on Pagan Island, Mariana Islands FRESHWATER AND MARINE INSECT SURVEYS ON PAGAN ISLAND, MARIANA ISLANDS DAN A. POLHEMUS U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, HI Final Report 15 November 2010 Prepared for U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, HI Cover picture: Pagan Island seen from the southeast, with the Sengao Peninsula in the foreground, and active Mt. Pagan (570 m.) in the background (D. A. Polhemus photo). 2 Aquatic Insect Surveys on Pagan Island, Mariana Islands Fig. 1. Aerial view of Pagan as seen looking south from above Lake Sanhiyon. The Bandeera Peninsula is visible in the middle distance. The prominent mountain massif in the center of the picture consists of the twin peaks of Mt. Maru and Mt. Togari. The highest peaks on the island, lying beyond to the south, are un-named on current topographic maps. Note the plume of low salinity water from the inflow springs cutting at an angle across the lake surface the in the lower right hand portion of the picture. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The island of Pagan, one of the largest in the Northern Marianas, lacks perennial streams but possesses an interesting set of lentic ecosystems, including two mixohaline lakes lying at differing elevations, and a tidally influenced, diurnally transient freshwater wetland. The island also features diverse intertidal systems on its rugged coastlines with tide pools formed in both basalt and limestone exposures. Collections of aquatic insects were made from these inland water and intertidal habitats at 8 sampling stations ranging in elevation from 0–15 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Richness and Diversity of Odonates of the Agricultural College and Research Institute, Vazhavachanur, Tamilnadu, India
    #0# Acta Biologica 27/2020 | www.wnus.edu.pl/ab | DOI: 10.18276/ab.2020.27-06 | strony 57–65 Richness and diversity of odonates of the agricultural college and research institute, Vazhavachanur, Tamilnadu, India Vaithiyanathan Radhakrishnan,1 Ramanathan Arulprakash,2 Iyappan Parivarthani,3 Selvarasu Ponnivalavan,3 Mohan Priyadharshini,3 Muthaiyan Pandiyan4 1 Agricultural College and Research Institute, Vazhavachanur – 606 753, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu, India 2 Seeds Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore – 641 003, Tamil Nadu, India 3 Agricultural College and Research Institute, Vazhavachanur – 606 753, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu, India 4 Agricultural College and Research Institute, Vazhavachanur – 606 753, Thiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu, India Corresponding Authora e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Keywords Vazhavachanur, Dragonfly, Damselfy, Libellulidae and Coenagrionidae Abstract Investigations on the diversity of Odonata in and around the Agricultural College and Research Institute, Vazhavachanur, Tamil Nadu, India were studied. Eight locations were selected, of which sixteen Odonata species were recorded. In total, eleven dragonfly and five damselfly species were identified from Thiruvannamalai district, Tamil Nadu, India.Pantala flavescens, Diplacodes trivialis, Brachythemis contaminata and Ischnura aurora were recorded from all eight locations. Trithemis pallidinervis and Agriocnemis pygmaea were recorded from seven locations except from the farm pond and the open stretch area. Rhyothemis variegata was recorded only at the open stretch area. The results clearly show that, Odonates have specific habitat preferences for their growth and development. Four families Libellulidae, Gomphidae, Aeshnidae and Coenagrionidae were observed and collected during the study. Libellulidae were the most abundant family (56.25%) and comprised of 9 species, followed by Coenagrionidae (31.25%) with 5 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Australian the to Guide Identification
    Identification Guide to theAustralian Odonata www.environment.nsw.gov.au Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data Theischinger, G. (Gunther), 1940– Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata 1. Odonata – Australia. 2. Odonata – Australia – Identification. I. Endersby I. (Ian), 1941- . II. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW © 2009 Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW Front cover: Petalura gigantea, male (photo R. Tuft) Prepared by: Gunther Theischinger, Waters and Catchments Science, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW and Ian Endersby, 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Victoria 3094 Published by: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street Sydney PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131555 (information & publication requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW is pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. ISBN 978 1 74232 475 3 DECCW 2009/730 December 2009 Printed using environmentally sustainable paper. Contents About this guide iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Systematics
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding of Selected Dragonfly Species (Libellulidae and Aeshnidae) for Species Authentication with Phylogenetic Assessment
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2012, 2 (6):2158-2165 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU DNA Barcoding of selected dragonfly species (Libellulidae and Aeshnidae) for species authentication with phylogenetic assessment Pushparaj Karthika 1, *Chitravel Vadivalagan 1, Chinnapan Gunasekaran 1 and Shanmugam Anandakumar 2 1Conservation Biology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 2Computation Biology Laboratory, Department of Bioinformatics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Dragonflies are the bio indicators of the aquatic ecosystem. Knowledge and studies on the diversity of dragonflies in India is very high. Identification by traditional taxonomy often leads to misidentification. Incidence of sexual dimorphism is found to be high particularly in the Libellulidae and Aeshnidae family. In order to resolve the above mentioned problem, the accurate identification of the dragonflies was carried out by DNA barcoding using COI gene. In the present study, selected dragonfly species (Bradinopyga geminata, Crocothemis servilia, Diplacodes trivialis and Anaciaeschna jaspidea) of the family of Libellulidae and Aeshnidae were taken and along with three other evident species (Pantala flavescens, Orthetrum sabina, and Brachythemis contaminata) were retrieved from GenBank. The phylogenetic tree was created using NJ (Neighbour Joining) method to determine the origin and evolutionary relationships of the species. Similarity search was performed and conformed species were submitted to the NCBI and BOLD database for species authentication. The present study concluded that the DNA barcoding is an invaluable tool for the authentication of the species. Storage of this nucleotide information in a database like BOLD would greatly help in the identification up to sub species level.
    [Show full text]