DOCSLIB.ORG

The Spear of Destiny

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Spear of Destiny The Spear of Destiny The Occult Power Behind the Spear which pierced the Side of Christ ... ... and how Hitler Inverted the force in a bid to Conquer the World. Trevor Ravenscroft PROLOGUE THE MOULD OF A LEGEND “But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water. “And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true: and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe. “For these things were done that the scripture should be fulfilled, ‘a bone of Him shall not be broken*. “And again another scripture saith, ‘They shall look on Him whom they have pierced*.” S a i n t J o h n 1 9 , 3 4 - 3 7 In the final chapters of the Gospel of Saint John it is told how a soldier pierced the side of Christ with a Spear. The name of this soldier was Gaius Cassius and he attended the crucifixion as the official Roman representative for the Pro-Consul, Pontius Pilate. Cataracts in both eyes prevented this veteran officer from battle service with his Legion and instead he reported on the religious and political scene in Jerusalem. For two years Gaius Cassius had followed the activities of a certain Jesus of Nazareth who claimed to be the Messiah and looked like undermining the authority of the Roman occupation of Israel. The Roman centurion watched the Legionaries carry out the execution of Jesus Christ and like them, too, he was impressed by the courage, dignity and bearing of the Nazarene on the Cross. Isaiah had prophesied of the Messiah, “A bone of Him shall not be broken.” Annas, the aged advisor to the Sanhedrin, and Caiaphas, the High Priest, were intent on mutilating the body of Christ to prove to the masses of the people that Jesus was not the Messiah, but merely a heretic and potential usurper of their own power. The hours were passing and this presented the excuse they needed. For Annas was an authority on the Law, and the Jewish Law decreed that no man should be executed on the Sabbath Day. Straightway, they petitioned Pontius Pilate for the authority to break the limbs of the crucified men so that they should die before dusk on that Friday afternoon (5th April, 33 A.D.). A party from the Temple Guard was sent out for this purpose to the mount on Golgotha, which means the Place of the Skull. At their head, the Captain carried the Spear of Herod Antipas, King of the Jews, which was the symbol of the authority to perform the act; or else the Roman soldiers would not have permitted him to lift a finger to the men when he reached the place of execution. Phineas, the ancient Prophet, had caused this Spear to be forged to symbolise the magical powers inherent in the blood of God’s Chosen People. Already old as a talisman of power, it had been raised in the hand of Joshua when he signalled his soldiers to shout the great shout which crumbled the walls of Jericho. The very* same Spear was hurled at the young David by King Saul in a fit of jealousy. Herod The Great had held this insignia of power over life and death when he ordered the massacre of the innocent babes throughout Judea in his attempt to slay the Christ child who would grow up to be called the “King of the Jews”. Now the Spear was carried on behalf of the son of Herod The Great, as a symbol of authority to break the bones of Jesus Christ. When the party from the Temple Guard arrived at the scene of crucifixion the Roman soldiers turned their backs in disgust. Only Gaius Cassius remained to witness how these vassals of the High Priests clubbed and crushed the skulls and limbs of Gestas and Dismas nailed to Crosses on either side of Jesus Christ. The Roman centurion was so repelled by the sight of the dreadful mutilation of the bodies of the two thieves and so touched by Christ’s humble and fearless submission to the cruel nailing that he decided to protect the body of the Nazarene. Charging his horse towards the high central Cross, the Roman centurion thrust a Spear into the right side of Jesus Christ, piercing the chest between the fourth and fifth ribs. Such a manner of piercing was the custom of Roman soldiers on the field of battle when they sought to prove that a wounded enemy was dead; for the blood no longer flows from a lifeless body. Yet “forthwith came there out blood and water”, and, in this moment of the miraculous flowing of the redemptive blood of the Saviour, the failing sight of Gaius Cassius was completely restored. It is not known whether this veteran officer grasped the talisman of power from the hands of the Israelite Captain to perform this deed, or whether he carried out this spontaneous act of mercy with his own Spear. There is no historical proof to indicate with which weapon it was that he unwittingly fulfilled the prophecy of Ezekiel: “They shall look upon Him whom they have pierced.” In the.Temple where Caiaphas and Annas awaited news of the mutilation of the body of the Messiah, the Veil of the Holy of Holies was rent from top to bottom to expose the Black Cube of the Old Covenant which now split along its edges to open out into the form of the Cross. The imageless cult of Jehovah was ended; the religion of the “Open Heavens” had begun. The Spear, like a catalyst of revelation, furnished the living proof of the resurrection for the physical wound from its tapering point was mysteriously sealed upon the risen Christ when he appeared to the spiritual vision of his gathered Apostles. Only the doubting Thomas, trusting solely to the outer appearances of physical sight, failed to perceive the God-Man who passed through closed doors to appear to him. “Then saith He to Thomas, ‘Reach higher thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless but believing.* ” Because the earthly wounds from the Spear and the nailing appeared upon the Phantom Body of the risen Christ, the first Christians believed that had his bones been shattered on the Cross, the Resurrection as we know it could never have been accomplished; for this was the meaning they attributed to the mysterious words of Isaiah: “A bone of Him shall not be broken.” Gaius Cassius, who had performed a martial deed out of the compassionate motive to protect the body of Jesus Christ, became known as Longinus The Spearman. A convert to Christianity, he came to be revered as a great hero and saint by the first Christian community in Jerusalem, and a prime witness of the shedding of the Blood of the New Covenant for which the Spear became the symbol. It was said that for a moment in Time he had held the destiny of the whole of mankind in his hands. The Spear with which he had pierced the side of Christ became one of the great treasures of Christendom and a unique legend attached itself to this weapon in which one of the nails from the Cross was later placed. The legend grew around it, gaining strength with the passing of the centuries, that whoever possessed it and understood the powers it served, held the destiny of the world in his hands for good or evil. This legend, which has persisted throughout two millennia of Christendom, has seen its most dreadful fulfilment in the twentieth century. INTRODUCTION IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE MEMORY The man who would have written this book but for his untimely death was a certain Dr. Walter Johannes Stein, a Vienna-born scientist and Doctor of Philosophy, who acted during World War II as confidential adviser to Sir Winston Churchill regarding the minds and motivation of Adolf Hitler and the leading members of the Nazi Party. Very considerable pressure was brought to bear to dissuade Dr. Stein from revealing what is now presented as the content of this book, but in the final issue he was not influenced in any way by such external persuasion, not even in this instance by Sir Winston Churchill himself who was insistent that the occultism of the Nazi Party should not under any circumstances be revealed to the general public. The failure of the Nuremberg Trials to identify the nature of the evil at work behind the outer facade of National Socialism convinced him that another three decades must pass before a large enough readership would be present to comprehend the initiation rites and black magic practices of the inner core of the Nazi leadership. He sadly witnessed the extent to which the Allied Prosecutors at these trials for crimes against humanity lacked the moral imagination to perceive the apocalyptic countenance of the civilisation that had arisen in Germany between the two world wars—a civilisation based upon a magical Weltanschauung which ... had substituted the Swastika for the Cross. He understood why a unanimous agreement had been made among the Judges to treat the accused as though they were an integral part of the accepted Humanist and Cartesian system of the Western world. To have admitted even for an instant what their defeated enemies were really like, to have lifted the veil to reveal the real motives for such an astonishing reversal of values, might have opened millions of people to the risk of a terrible corruption.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Trial by Fire of Peter Bartholomew: a Case Study in Medieval Social Conflict' Kostick, Conor
    'The trial by fire of Peter Bartholomew: a case study in medieval social conflict' Kostick, Conor Citation Kostick, C. (2012). 'The trial by fire of Peter Bartholomew: a case study in medieval social conflict'. Leidschrift : Met Het Kruis Getekend, 27(December), 21-40. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/73165 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/73165 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). The trial by fire of Peter Bartholomew: a case study in medieval social conflict Conor Kostick If Omnipotent God talked to this man face to face, and Saint Andrew revealed the Holy Lance to him when he was keeping vigil, let him walk through the fire unhurt; but if this is a lie let him and the Lance he will carry in his hand be consumed by fire. 1 The ordeal by fire of Peter Bartholomew during the course of the First Crusade (1096-1099) is one of the more dramatic examples of a medieval trial by ordeal. Much discussed by historians of the crusades, it deserves wider attention as a case study of a particular type of legal case: one where contending political and social factions agree to put their dispute to a test, a test whose outcome they then attempt to influence. Despite the canonical hesitancy over the legitimacy of the practice of the ordeal, 2 at the time of the First Crusade the trial by ordeal was a powerful tradition, invoked especially in circumstances where other evidence was lacking.3 In his An Introduction to English Legal History, however, J.H.
    [Show full text]
  • From Charlemagne to Hitler: the Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire and Its Symbolism
    From Charlemagne to Hitler: The Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire and its Symbolism Dagmar Paulus (University College London) [email protected] 2 The fabled Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire is a striking visual image of political power whose symbolism influenced political discourse in the German-speaking lands over centuries. Together with other artefacts such as the Holy Lance or the Imperial Orb and Sword, the crown was part of the so-called Imperial Regalia, a collection of sacred objects that connotated royal authority and which were used at the coronations of kings and emperors during the Middle Ages and beyond. But even after the end of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, the crown remained a powerful political symbol. In Germany, it was seen as the very embodiment of the Reichsidee, the concept or notion of the German Empire, which shaped the political landscape of Germany right up to National Socialism. In this paper, I will first present the crown itself as well as the political and religious connotations it carries. I will then move on to demonstrate how its symbolism was appropriated during the Second German Empire from 1871 onwards, and later by the Nazis in the so-called Third Reich, in order to legitimise political authority. I The crown, as part of the Regalia, had a symbolic and representational function that can be difficult for us to imagine today. On the one hand, it stood of course for royal authority. During coronations, the Regalia marked and established the transfer of authority from one ruler to his successor, ensuring continuity amidst the change that took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 5 for Printing
    Jan Milí č of Kroměř íž and Emperor Charles IV: Preaching, Power, and the Church of Prague Eleanor Janega UCL Thesis Submitted for the degree of PhD in History 1 I, Eleanor Janega, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in my thesis. 2 Abstract During the second half of the fourteenth century Jan Milí č of Krom ěř íž became an active and popular preacher in Prague. The sermons which he delivered focused primarily on themes of reform, and called for a renewal within the church. Despite a sustained popularity with the lay populace of Prague, Milí č faced opposition to his practice from many individual members of the city’s clergy. Eventually he was the subject of twelve articles of accusation sent to the papal court of Avignon. Because of the hostility which Milí č faced, historians have most often written of him as a precursor to the Hussites. As a result he has been identified as an anti-establishment rabble-rouser and it has been assumed that he conducted his career in opposition to the court of the Emperor Charles IV. This thesis, over four body chapters, examines the careers of both Milí č and Charles and argues that instead of being enemies, the two men shared an amicable relationship. The first chapter examines Milí č’s career and will prove that he was well-connected to Charles and several members of his court. It will also examine the most common reasons given to argue that Charles and Milí č were at odds, and disprove them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy Lance of Antioch
    The Holy Lance of Antioch A Study on the Impact of a Perceived Relic during the First Crusade Master Thesis By Marius Kjørmo The crucified Jesus and the Roman soldier Longinus with the spear that would become the Holy Lance. Portrait by Fra Angelico from the Dominican cloister San Marco, Florence. A Master Thesis in History, Institute of Archaeology, History, Culture Studies and Religion, University of Bergen, Spring 2009. 2 Contents Preface.........................................................................................................................................5 List of Maps..................................................................................................................................6 List of Illustrations.......................................................................................................................6 Cast of Characters.......................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................................................9 1.1. Introduction...........................................................................................................................9 1.2. Lance Historiography..........................................................................................................11 1.3. Terms and Expressions.......................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of the True Cross in Jerusalem in 1099 : Evidence and Reconsideration
    BARTŁOMIEJ DŹWIGAŁA Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego Instytut Historii ORCID: 0000-0003-3762-3917 The Discovery of the True Cross in Jerusalem in 1099 : Evidence and Reconsideration Key w ords: Relic of the Cross, True Cross, Kingdom of Jerusalem, First Crusade The discovery of the True Cross in Jerusalem just after the successful end of the First Crusade is probably one of the most baffling and neglected events in the history of the Kingdom of Jerusalem.1 Contemporaries perceived this miraculous discovery as the crowning point of the expedition, as well as a tangible sign of God’s favour, which is evident in the first letter sent by Pope Paschal II to the crusaders.2 The cen- trality of the Cross in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem is confirmed in a letter that Warmund, the patriarch of Jerusalem, sent to the archbishop of Santiago Compostela, where he stated that “we are ready to die rather than desert the holy city of Jerusalem and the Lord’s Cross and the most Holy Sepulchre of Christ.”3 These words clearly show that the responsibility for the protection of the True Cross was a key element in the identity of the crusader monarchy. The True Cross is alleged to have been discovered by Helena, mother of Con- stantine the Great. The legend of Helena’s finding of the Cross must have originated in the second half of the fourth century, most likely in Jerusalem.4 Relics of the Cross had spread across the Roman Empire by the middle of the fourth century and quickly 1 I would like to thank the De Brzezie Lanckoronski Foundation for its generous support, which allowed me to spent August 2018 in London and use the rich collections of the Warburg Institute Li- brary and the Institute of Historical Research Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection of the Lord April 21, 2019 Homily for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass of St
    Resurrection of the Lord April 21, 2019 Homily for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass of St. Thomas More Catholic Parish celebrated at St. Joseph Catholic Church 116 Theodore St. Scranton, PA 18508 John 20:1-9 On the tenth anniversary of our parish’s first pilgrimage to Rome, a number of our parishioners returned to the Eternal City. We had a great tour guide, who took us into St. Peter’s Basilica and spent a good amount of time with us underneath that church’s massive dome. The four pillars that hold up the dome double as shrines for some of the most important relics in all of Christendom. One of the pillars holds the lance that was used to pierce the side of Christ as he hung dead upon the Cross, causing the fifth of our Lord’s glorious wounds. At first glance it seems ridiculous that the Church should possess one of the weapons that was used in our Lord’s Passion. After all, the lance belongs not to the disciples of Jesus, but to the band of soldiers who literally killed Jesus, the ones who physically nailed him to the tree. But then we read the Book of Acts, from which we heard this morning, and the church’s possession of the soldiers’ lance no longer seems so implausible. The context of St. Peter’s speech in our first lesson is the conversion to the Catholic faith of Cornelius, the Roman centurion whom, with his household, St. Peter brought into the Church. This is the same speech in which the first Pope asserted, “Truly I perceive that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him” (Acts 10:34-35).
    [Show full text]
  • The Crown of His Kingdom: Imperial Ideology, Palace Ritual, and the Relics of Christ's Passion
    Holger A. Klein The Crown of His Kingdom: Imperial Ideology, Palace Ritual, and the Relics of Christ’s Passion* In his well-known eyewitness account of the palace revolt of John “the Fat” Komnenos, likely written shortly after the events in the summer of 1201, Nikolaos Mesarites, then skevophylax of the churches inside the imperial palace, vividly described the sacred contents of the Church of the Virgin of the Pharos, a small but precious building located, as Patriarch Photios records, “in the very midst of the palace” (ἐν μέσοις αὐτοι˜ς ἀνακτόροις) and in close proximity to both the imperial apartments and the throne room, the Chrysotriklinos.1 Like the Chrysotriklinos, the church of the Virgin had been rebuilt and lavishly refurbished under emperor Michael III (842–867) after the end of Iconoclasm, and it gradually assumed the role of the empire’s most important repository of sacred relics, a locus sanctus at the very epicenter of imperial power and a new Jerusalem at the heart of the Byzantine Empire.2 Unlike earlier authors, who described the imperial relic collection, Mesarites framed his account in a rather unusual way, comparing the palace church metaphorically to the Garden of Eden and the Ark of the Covenant, and its sacred contents to the Ten Commandments: Hear from my lips the divine account, and learn how these ten treasures are called. […] First, there is the Crown of Thorns displayed for veneration, still fresh and green and unwithered, since it had a share in immor- tality through its contact with the head of Christ the Lord, refuting the still-unbelieving Jews, who do not bow down to worship the cross of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Entry Into the Sacred Heart Is for Everyone
    Entry into the Sacred Heart is for Everyone March 2009 Dear Friends of the Heart of Christ, There is a scene in The Passion of the Christ movie that gives me much thought for this Lenten Sacred Heart reflection. On Mount Calvary at the time when Jesus dies for us, one of the soldiers present takes his long spear and thrusts it into the ribs of Christ-aiming right for his heart. Jesus seems to have expired and this will not leave any doubt. Gathering storm clouds urge him on for he does not want to be caught in the violent winds and rains that have begun to pelt him. Recall the characters played by the soldiers and the terrible sufferings they wreck on Jesus. They are portrayed as heartless, mocking, crude, there to do a job and be over with it. Inflicting suffering on others makes them feel powerful, in control, dominant. As the centurion takes his long, steel-tipped spear and jabs it into the flesh of the dead Christ, a stream of blood and water literally flies out at him spurting over him into his face and eyes. In an instant he is changed. He is no longer the arrogant, jesting, hard-hearted person he was but is transformed both physically and spiritually. He thus proclaims, “In truth this man was the Son of God.” Tradition has named this soldier Longinus-a latinized form of the Greek word longche which means spear. A statue of him as Saint Longinus appears in the Vatican by the famous artist Bernini.
    [Show full text]
  • In Heaven and on Earth: Church Treasure in Late Medieval Bohemia
    In Heaven and on Earth: Church Treasure in Late Medieval Bohemia by Kateřina Horníčková Submitted to Central European University Department of Medieval Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Gerhard Jaritz Budapest, Hungary 2009 CEU eTD Collection - i- Table of content Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................. iv Plates on CD ROM ................................................................................................................................... v Maps.................................................................................................................................................... vii Abbreviations......................................................................................................................................... viii Foreword ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I – Treasures of churches in prospective ............................................................................... 3 I. The Medieval Treasure as a Research Subject ...................................................................................... 3 1. The Treasure in Medieval Culture .................................................................................................... 3 2. The Treasury, the Church and the Public.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Conflict: Investigating the Role of Relics and Holy Sites in the Religiously Diverse Society of Crusader Famagusta, Cyprus
    Chapter 3 Religion and Conflict: Investigating the Role of Relics and Holy Sites in the Religiously Diverse Society of Crusader Famagusta, Cyprus Tomasz Borowski 1 Medieval Cult of Relics and Holy Places Relics are the preserved remains of a saint or holy person (corporeal rel- ics), or objects with which they came into physical contact, such as clothing (secondary or contact relics). Their power to heal is mentioned in the Bible in passages describing a miracle associated with the mantle of Elijah (Kings 2:9–14) and ascribing curative powers to cloths that had been touched by St. Paul (Acts 19:11–12). The cult of relics found a place among the earliest Chris- tian communities, though their veneration has a far older history and is shared by many religions of the world. From a medieval Christian perspective, relics represented the living physical presence of a saint in the world and, on the Day of the Last Judgment, they would be reassembled to become part of the saint’s glorified body. Mere possession was itself a visible sign of piety but, more than that, relics were the medium through which a saint could manifest his or her will.1 The cult of relics and holy sites played a crucial role in the history of the crusades. The desire to liberate holy places occupied by the Muslims and to reopen the pilgrimage routes to the Levant was the principal driving force be- hind the Latin capture of Jerusalem in 1099 and the establishment of the first crusader states. Once liberated, pilgrimage shrines continued to shape the ev- eryday reality of those who lived in their proximity.
    [Show full text]
  • Crusaders Under Siege: the Battle of Antioch in Documents And
    Crusaders Under Siege: The Battle of Antioch in Documents and Historical Narrative Jacob M. Rambin History Faculty advisor: Chris Craun By the 2nd of June, 1098, Crusading armies of the West during the First Crusade had been laying continuous siege to the Turkish-held city of Antioch for nearly 8 months. On the 2nd, they took the city of Antioch only to find they were themselves under siege in the very city they had fought so hard to take. This siege of the city by the atabeg of Mosul, Kerbogha, was to last from the 7th of June to the 28th and would try the very heart of the Crusading army as they attempted to break the siege. There was no time to replenish their supplies or even to clear the streets of the rotting dead left over from the previous battle. Because of this, the Crusaders suffered from starvation and disease throughout this grueling period. The Crusading army was trapped and unable to flee, leaving them with quite literally only two options, victory or annihilation. In their desperation, rather than collapse into disorder and chaos, their suffering found its way to the safety valve of mysticism and credulity. A monk, Peter Bartholomew, came forward reporting visions of the Holy Lance which he claimed could be found buried under the floor of the cathedral of St. Peter. The chronicles agree that a relic was indeed found and presented as the Lance, but many of the chroniclers and participants considered it a fraud placed there for CLA Journal 1 (2013) pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for the Conquest of Antioch (1097-1098) the Struggle
    The Struggle for the Conquest of Antioch (1097-1098) The Struggle for the Conquest of Antioch (1097-1098): Muslim and Christian Perspectives of a Critical Battle during the First Crusade Mersadi’s Dâ Curtsinger Pope Urban II’s sermon at the Council of Clermont in 1095 calling for Christians of Europe to recapture Jerusalem in the name of God brought forth a widespread response from people of all social ranks.1 These included princeps (princes or leaders), minors (petty knights, castellans, and lords), the populous (the poor and laborers), and, lastly, the clergy.2 The following excerpt from Urban’s letter provides instructions on how the Christian community could join this cause: Your brotherhood, we believe, has long since learned from many accounts that a barbaric fury has deplorably afflicted and laid waste the churches of God in the regions of the Orient. More than this, blasphemous to say, it has even grasped in intolerable servitude its churches and the Holy City of Christ, glorified by his passion and resurrection. Grieving with pious concern at this calamity, we visited the regions of Gaul and devoted ourselves largely to urging the princes of the land and their subjects to free the churches of the East. We solemnly enjoined upon them at the council of Auvergne (the accomplishment of) such an undertaking, as a preparation for the remission of all their sins. And we have constituted our most beloved son, Adhemar [sic], Bishop of Puy, leader of this expedition and undertaking in our stead, so that those who, perchance, may wish to undertake this journey should comply [w]ith his commands, as if they were their own, and submit fully to his loosings or bindings, as far as shall seem to belong to such an office.
    [Show full text]