DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Recreational Fishing in the Middle and South

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Recreational Fishing in the Middle and South MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHING IN THE MIDDLE AND SOUTH ATLANTIC: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY Report on Cooperative Agreement #CR-811043-01-0 between the University of Maryland and the Environmental Protection Agency, National Marine Fisheries Service, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Ivar E. Strand, K. E. McConnell, and Nancy E. Bockstael Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and David G. Swartz Maryland Sea Grant Program University of Maryland College Park, Maryland 20742 August 1991 DISCLAIMER Although prepared under EPA Cooperative Agreement CR811043-01, this report has neither been reviewed nor approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for publication as an EPA report. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Acknowledgments We have received considerable help in the development of this report. First, Peter Caulkins and Mary Jo Kealy encouraged and funded us to continue efforts beyond our initial EPA co-operative agreement and provided valuable insight during the research process. Next, Mark Holliday of NMFS provided substantial funding, the necessary data, and the essential assistance of John Witzig (NMFS). Kathryn Chandler was essential in questionnaire development and implementation. The NOAA representatives, Bob Leeworthy, Norman Meade and Mark Monaco, provided useful funding suggestions and helpful review throughout. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page Acknowledgements ii List of Tables iv List of Figures vi 1 The Purpose of the Research 1 2 Sportfishing in New York 22 3 Sportfishing in New Jersey 46 4 Sportfishing in Delaware 73 5 Sportfishing in Maryland 94 6 Sportfishing in Virginia 119 7 Sportfishing in North Carolina 141 8 Sportfishing in South Carolina 166 9 Sportfishing in Georgia 187 10 Sportfishing in Florida 209 LIST OF TABLES Number Title Page 1 Telephone Sample Frame 17 2 UMCP Sites in Middle and South Atlantic 18 3 Sampling Effort in the UMCP Survey 21 New York NY.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 32 NY.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 33 NY.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 34 NY.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 35 NY.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 36 NY.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 37 NY.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 38 NY.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 39 New Jersey NJ.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 57 NJ.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 58 NJ.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 59 NJ.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 60 NJ.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 61 NJ.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 62 NJ.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 63 NJ.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 64 Delaware DE.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 82 DE.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 83 DE.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 84 DE.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 85 DE.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 86 DE.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 87 DE.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 88 DE.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 89 Maryland MD.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 105 MD.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 106 MD.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 107 MD.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 108 MD.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 109 MD.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 110 MD.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 111 MD.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 112 Virginia VA.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 129 VA.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 130 VA.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 131 VA.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 132 VA.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 133 VA.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 134 VA.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 135 VA.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 136 North Carolina NC.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 152 NC.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 153 NC.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 154 NC.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 155 NC.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 156 NC.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 157 NC.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 158 NC.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 159 South Carolina SC.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 175 SC.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 176 SC.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 177 SC.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 178 SC.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 179 SC.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 180 SC.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 181 SC.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 182 Georgia GA.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 197 GA.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 198 GA.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 199 GA.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 200 GA.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 201 GA.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 202 GA.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 203 GA.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 204 Florida FL.1 Two-Month Participation Rates, by Wave and Year 219 FL.2 Linear Trend Analysis, Participation Rates 220 FL.3 Trips per Household Called, by Year and Season 221 FL.4 Percent of Fishing Trips in Various Modes, by Wave 222 FL.5 Percent Fishing Households Who Fish in Various Areas 223 FL.6 Average Characteristics of Day Trips, by Mode 224 FL.7 Characteristics of Trips for Overnight Visits 225 FL.8 Percent of Trips Seeking Different Species Groups 226 LIST OF FIGURES Number Title Page New York NY.1 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Long Island Sound and Atlantic Ocean by Year and Mode 40 NY.2 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Long Island Sound, by Wave and Mode 41 NY.3 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Atlantic Ocean, by Wave and Mode 42 NY.4 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, by Year and Mode 43 NY.5 Flatfish Catch Per Day, by Year and Mode 44 NY.6 Flatfish Catch Per Day, by Wave and Mode 45 New Jersey NJ.1 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Ocean by Year and Mode 65 NJ.2 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Ocean by Wave and Mode 66 NJ.3 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Raritan Bay by Wave and Mode 67 NJ.4 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, Ocean Sites by Year and Mode 68 NJ.5 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, Ocean Sites by Wave and Mode 69 NJ.6 Flatfish Catch Per Day, Ocean by Year and Mode 70 NJ.7 Flatfish Catch Per Day, Raritan Bay by Year and Mode 71 NJ.8 Flatfish Catch Per Day, Ocean and Raritan Bay by Wave and Mode 72 Delaware DE.1 Smallgame Catch Per Day by Year and Mode 90 DE.2 Smallgame Catch Per Day by Wave and Mode 91 DE.3 Flatfish Catch Per Day by Year and Mode 92 DE.4 Flatfish Catch Per Day by Wave and Mode 93 Maryland MD.1 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Chesapeake Bay by Year and Mode 113 MD.2 Smallgame Catch Per Day, by Wave and Mode 114 MD.3 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, Chesapeake Bay by Year and Mode 115 MD.4 Bottomfish Catch Per Day by Wave and Mode 116 MD.5 Flatfish Catch Per Day by Year and Mode 117 MD.6 Flatfish Catch Per Day by Wave and Mode 118 Virginia VA.1 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Chesapeake Bay by Year and Mode 137 VA.2 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Bay and Ocean by Wave and Mode 138 VA.3 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, Chesapeake Bay by Year and Mode 139 VA.4 Flatfish Catch Per Day, Bay and Ocean by Year and Mode 140 North Carolina NC.1 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Morehead City and North by Year and Mode 160 NC.2 Smallgame Catch Per Day, Morehead City and North by Wave and Mode 161 NC.3 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, Morehead City and North by Year and Mode 162 NC.4 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, Morehead City and North by Wave and Mode 163 NC.5 Flatfish Catch Per Day, Morehead City and North by Year and Mode 164 NC.6 Flatfish Catch Per Day, Morehead City and North by Wave and Mode 165 South Carolina SC.1 Smallgame Catch Per Day by Year and Mode 183 SC.2 Smallgame Catch Per Day by Wave and Mode 184 SC.3 Bottomfish Catch Per Day by Year and Mode 185 SC.4 Bottomfish Catch Per Day by Wave and Mode 186 Georgia GA.1 Smallgame Catch Per Day by Year and Mode 205 GA.2 Smallgame Catch Per Day by Wave and Mode 206 GA.3 Bottomfish Catch Per Day by Year and Mode 207 GA.4 Bottomfish Catch Per Day by Wave and Mode 208 Florida FL.1 Big Game Catch Per Day, South Florida by Year and Mode 227 FL.2 Big Game Catch Per Day, South Florida by Wave and Mode 228 FL.3 Smallgame Catch Per Day, North Florida by Year and Mode 229 FL.4 Smallgame Catch Per Day, South Florida by Year and Mode 230 FL.5 Smallgame Catch Per Day, North Florida by Wave and Mode 231 FL.6 Smallgame Catch Per Day, South Florida by Wave and Mode 232 FL.7 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, North Florida by Year and Mode 233 FL.8 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, South Florida by Year and Mode 234 FL.9 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, North Florida by Wave and Mode 235 FL.10 Bottomfish Catch Per Day, South Florida by Wave and Mode 236 Chapter 1 THE PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH This report is the descriptive phase of a research project on the economics of marine recreational fishing along the Middle and South Atlantic coast of the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The New Americanism [May 18, 1918] 1
    Oneal: The New Americanism [May 18, 1918] 1 The New Americanism by James Oneal Published in The Class Struggle [New York], vol. 2, no. 3 (May-June 1918), pp. 289-295. Reprinted in The Call Magazine [New York], May 19, 1918, pp. 4, 10. The intense propaganda now being waged by re- the revolutions of 1848 sent more than a million from actionary elements to “Americanize” the United States 1840 to 1850. brings to mind some curious facts which these crusad- ers will hardly consider, facts which include a similar • • • • • crusade in the ’50s of the last century. Though this native American agitation is mainly directed against Out of this ferment came one of those politi- Germans who display some sympathy with the imperial cal freaks that have so often testified to the shallow assassins of Prussia, there is an unmistakable warning character of bourgeois political parties in the United against anything “foreign” in our opinions on various States. This freak was known as the “American Party,” matters. The Americanization program is directed or the “Know-Nothings.” It proclaimed itself distinctly with as much regard to reclaiming the internationalist American and opposed to the influence of foreigners Jew and Russian as it is in winning or suppressing the in politics and education. Its textbook, The Sons of nationalist German. The schools, the press, and poli- the Sires, published in 1855, is a prediction of what ticians work with fever heat to accelerate the normal fearful things were in store for us from the menace of process of assimilating the foreigner.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WEATHER of the MONTH. by Mr
    a10 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW. MAY,1905 which the Department is a party, and of all communications Weather Bureau storm-warning flags at the following-named to the Department of Justice, and to the various officers there- wireless telegraph stations of the Navy Department: of, including United States attorneys. He will examine and Seaveys Island Navy Yard, Portsmouth, N. H. approve, in advance of issue, all orders and regulations pro- Thatchers Island, Mass. mulgated by the Secretary under statutory authority. He will Nantucket Shoal light-vessel, Mass. represent the Department in all legal proceedings arising under Diamond Shoal light-vessel, off Hatteras, N. C. the various laws entrusted to the Department for esecution. Charleston light-vessel, S. C. He will prosecute applications of employees of the Department Mare Island Navy Yard, Cal. for patents under the terms of Department Circular No. 3, Yerba Buena, CaL-E. B. G. 1905. His duties will be performed under the immediat,e direction of the Secretary. ADDENDUM ET CORRIGENDA. Hkcnii.-Continucil cool and showery weather iu most sections during NOTES ON EARTHQUAKES BY WEATHER BUREAU month; drought iu the liau district of Hawaii broken during last week. OBSERVERS. Growing cane male good progress, niid a few of the plantations finished The following items are estracted from the Monthly Meteor- the harvesting of mature cane; preparation of lnnil and planting for the ological Reports for May. 1905: 1907 crop continued. Rice in all sections ripening with a heavy yield; some early rice already harvested in Hawaii and Oahu. The summer San Luis Obispo, Cal., Thursday, May 25, 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • South Atlantic Division Cancer Facts & Figures
    South Atlantic Division Cancer Facts & Figures 2008 Includes Appendix With State & County Data We Are Here. Making A Difference In Every Community. Delaware North Carolina District of Columbia South Carolina Georgia Virginia Maryland West Virginia South Atlantic Division, Inc. Contents American.Cancer.Society. Mission.Statement Introduction................................................................1 The American Cancer Society is the nationwide, Demographics............................................................2 community-based, voluntary health organization dedicated to eliminating cancer as a major health Estimated.New.Cancer.Cases.&.Deaths,.2008..........4 problem by preventing cancer, saving lives and diminishing suffering from cancer, through research, Incidence.and.Mortality.............................................5 education, advocacy, and service. Trends.in.Cancer.Incidence.and.Mortality................6 Cancer.Among.Hispanics.and.Latinos......................8 Acknowledgements Health Profile among Hispanic Adults Health Profile among Hispanic Youth With.grateful.appreciation.for.their. Cancer Screening Patterns among Hispanics Cancer Incidence and Mortality among Hispanics contribution.and.assistance:. Stage at Cancer Diagnosis and Survival Delaware Cancer Registry Access to Care Alison Shevock, PhD Programs to Promote Healthy Behaviors among Hispanics Limitations District of Columbia Cancer Registry References Aaron Adade, PhD; Alicia Vargas Delaware..................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • The Shifting Pattern of Black Migration from and Into The
    The Shifting Patterns of Black Migration From and Into the Nonmetropolitan South, 1965-95. By Glenn V. Fuguitt and John A. Fulton, University of Wisconsin- Madison, and Calvin L. Beale, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Rural Development Research Report No. 93. Abstract In the period 1965-95, Black migration from the nonmetropolitan (rural and small- town) South to places in the North and West declined significantly, shifting instead mostly to the metropolitan South. This outmovement, in turn, became offset by migration of Blacks into (or back to) rural districts from metropolitan areas. Net population loss is still evident in areas of the western nonmetropolitan South that have significant proportions of Blacks, but not in the eastern South. Migration low- ered the education level of the nonmetropolitan Black population somewhat by a net loss of college graduates and a net inflow of persons who had not finished high school. Poverty rates of Blacks coming into the nonmetropolitan South were as high as those of the nonmigrant population, indicating no general income benefit from the urban inflow. Keywords: Black migration, nonmetropolitan population, rural South, education, poverty Acknowledgments Support for this research was provided through a cooperative agreement between the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and the Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and also by the Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, through a grant from the Center for Population Research of the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development. The authors are grateful to Kathleen Kassel of the Economic Research Service and Deborah Brauer of the University of Wisconsin-Madison for technical assistance, as well as to John Cromartie and Leslie Whitener of the Economic Research Service and Franklin Wilson of the University of Wisconsin-Madison for helpful comments on the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brazilian Geopolitical Strategy for the South Atlantic
    The Brazilian geopolitical strategy for the South Atlantic BRUNO GOMES GUIMARÃES 1 INTRODUCTION1 The South Atlantic Ocean is currently undergoing a moment of rising international importance. There have been many discove- ries of mineral and oil resources on its basin that brought mariti- me territorial disputes back to the international agenda. Moreover, with the increasingly limited capacity of the Panama and Suez Canals (which do not support super-tankers), the relevance of the South Atlantic trade routes as a whole has augmented. Brazil is a crucial actor in this scenario for it has the longest coastline in the South Atlantic. Brazil has almost 7500 km of Atlantic coastline and 80% of the Brazilian population lives near the coast, and 95% of the country’s international trade is carried out through South Atlantic oceanic routes (WIESEBRON, 2013). Several natural resources were discovered in the Brazilian Exclusive Economic Zone (ZEE), but most importantly oil and gas were discovered in deep waters of the South Atlantic in 2006 (the “Pré-Sal”). In full operation, the oil reserves would make Brazil one of the world’s top ten oil producers (WIESEBRON, 2013). Furthermore, Brazil gradually enhances its role in the international system, and as an emerging power, it is important to analyze its rise to watch if it is going to be peaceful or not. That is why observing the Brazilian geopolitical strategy is vital to understanding the evolution of the international system as a whole. Therefore, this research focuses on Brazil’s geopolitical strategy and its policies towards the South Atlantic, trying to 1 I thank the comments on earlier versions of this piece by fellow researchers Marcela Ávila, Julian Fitz, Jéssica Höring, Giovana Zucatto, João Arthur Reis, David Ramin Jalilvand and Iara Binta Machado and the assistance of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Geographic Areas, and Biography
    Table 2. Geographic Areas, and Biography The following numbers are never used alone, but may be used as required (either directly when so noted or through the interposition of notation 09 from Table 1) with any number from the schedules, e.g., public libraries (027.4) in Japan (—52 in this table): 027.452; railroad transportation (385) in Brazil (—81 in this table): 385.0981. They may also be used when so noted with numbers from other tables, e.g., notation 025 from Table 1. When adding to a number from the schedules, always insert a decimal point between the third and fourth digits of the complete number SUMMARY —001–009 Standard subdivisions —1 Areas, regions, places in general; oceans and seas —2 Biography —3 Ancient world —4 Europe —5 Asia —6 Africa —7 North America —8 South America —9 Australasia, Pacific Ocean islands, Atlantic Ocean islands, Arctic islands, Antarctica, extraterrestrial worlds —001–008 Standard subdivisions —009 History If “history” or “historical” appears in the heading for the number to which notation 009 could be added, this notation is redundant and should not be used —[009 01–009 05] Historical periods Do not use; class in base number —[009 1–009 9] Geographic treatment and biography Do not use; class in —1–9 —1 Areas, regions, places in general; oceans and seas Not limited by continent, country, locality Class biography regardless of area, region, place in —2; class specific continents, countries, localities in —3–9 > —11–17 Zonal, physiographic, socioeconomic regions Unless other instructions are given, class
    [Show full text]
  • THE WEATHER of the MONTH. by Mr
    OCTOBER,1907 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW. 481 THE WEATHER OF THE MONTH. By Mr. P. C. DAY,Assietant Chief, Division of Meteorological Records. PRESSURE. Temperature extremes were generally within the usual Octo- The distribution of mean atmospheric pressure for October, ber limits. Maximum temperatures from 90' to 96' were 1907, over the United States and Canada, is graphically recorded in central Texas, and from 90' to slightly more than shown on Chart VI, and the average values and departures 100' in the central valleys of California and over southwestern from the normal are shown for each station in Tables I and V. Arizona. Over northern New England masimum temperatures During October, 1907, the increase in mean pressure over did not go above 70". that for September in all the central districts of the United Freezing temperatures penetrated into the northern portion States and Canada was decidedly above the average, ranging of the cotton region States and occurred generally at exposed from +.lo to +.15 inch, whereas the normal increase is less points in the mountain and Plateau districts. Over the lower than .05 inch, except over the upper Missouri Valley and the elevations of California, the western portions of Oregon and districts west of the Rocky Mountains where the October Washington, and in the Snake River Valley of Idaho, the pressure averages from .05 to .10 inch above that for Septem- minimum temperatures were well above the freezing point and ber. Over the extreme eastern portion of the Maritime Prov- no damaging frosts occurred. inces of Canada, the immediate coast of central and northern PRECIPITATION.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-By-State Analysis
    kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis John Holahan, Matthew Buettgens, Caitlin Carroll, Stan Dorn The Urban Institute November 2012 1330 G STREET NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20005 P HONE: (202) 347-5270, F AX: ( 202) 347-5274 W EBSITE: WWW. KFF. ORG/ KCMU kaiser commission medicaid and the uninsured The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured provides information and analysis on health care coverage and access for the low-income population, with a special focus on Medicaid’s role and coverage of the uninsured. Begun in 1991 and based in the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Washington, DC office, the Commission is the largest operating program of the Foundation. The Commission’s work is conducted by Foundation staff under the guidance of a bi- partisan group of national leaders and experts in health care and public policy. James R. Tallon Chairman Diane Rowland, Sc.D. Executive Director kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured kaiser commission The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis medicaid and the uninsured John Holahan, Matthew Buettgens, Caitlin Carroll, Stan Dorn The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the The Urban Institute Uninsured provides information and analysis on health care coverage and access for the low-income population, with a special focus on Medicaid’s role and coverage of the uninsured. Begun in 1991 and based in the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Washington, DC office, the Commission is the largest operating program of the Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Reform Across the States: Increased Insurance Coverage and Federal Spending on the Exchanges and Medicaid
    Health Reform Across the States: Increased Insurance Coverage and Federal Spending on the Exchanges and Medicaid Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues March 2011 Matthew Buettgens, John Holahan and Caitlin Carroll Summary With the enactment of the Health Care and Education differences, ranging from 7.1 percent in New England Reconciliation Act of 2010 on March 30, 2010, the Patient to 10.3 percent of the nonelderly in West North Central Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) became law, states. The variation reflects differences in income fundamentally changing health insurance and access to distribution and the level of ESI coverage. health care in the United States. Using the Urban Institute’s • Under the ACA, exchange subsidies would total Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model (HIPSM), we approximately $33 billion, with the majority going to estimate important effects of the ACA at the state level: those below 200 percent of the federal poverty level the increase in insurance coverage, coverage and subsidies (FPL). Subsidies per nonelderly person, a useful measure in the new nongroup health benefit exchanges, Medicaid for comparing subsidy amounts between states, are enrollment and costs under the expansion and total new highest in the Pacific states and lowest in New England. federal spending on Medicaid and subsidies. We provide results by state, by region and by two useful groups of • Nationally, there would be 4.9 million new Medicaid states. Key results are also displayed on maps. For ease of enrollees who are eligible for Medicaid under current law, accounting for 8.3 percent of total new Medicaid comparison, we simulate the ACA as if fully implemented enrollment under the ACA.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Menhaden
    Fishery Management Report No. 37 of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Menhaden July 2001 Fishery Management Report No. 37 of the ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Menhaden July 2001 Amendment 1 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Menhaden Prepared by Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Atlantic Menhaden Plan Development Team Plan Development Team Members: Dr. Joseph C. Desfosse (ASMFC, Chair), Dr. Michael Armstrong (Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries), Ellen Cosby (Virginia Marine Resources Commission), Peter Himchak (New Jersey Division of Fish & Wildlife), Dr. John Merriner (National Marine Fisheries Service), Dr. Alexei Sharov (Maryland Department of Natural Resources) and Michael W. Street (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries). This Amendment was prepared under the guidance of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Atlantic Menhaden Management Board, Chaired by Mr. William Pruitt of the Virginia Marine Resources Commission. Technical assistance was provided by the Atlantic Menhaden Advisory Committee, the ad hoc Atlantic Menhaden Stock Assessment Committee and the NMFS Population Dynamics Team. This is a report of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Nos. NA97FG0034, NA07FG0024 and NA17FG1050. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction Concern over a real and/or perceived decline in the Atlantic menhaden population, plus the ecological importance of menhaden, led the Atlantic Menhaden Management Board to recommend that ASMFC conduct an external peer review of the menhaden stock assessment. The peer review was completed in November 1998 and provided recommendations for improving the assessment and management of menhaden (ASMFC 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Section/Chapter Membership Counts for Annual Reports
    Section/Chapter Membership Counts for Annual Reports CY 2019 CY 2020 Section/Chapter Members Members (pulled in mid (pulled in early 2019 Section 2020 Section Jan 2020) Jan 2021) Total Members Total Members Allegheny Mt. Section 124 98 213 147 Allegheny Mt. Section; NW Pennsylvania Chapter 28 20 Allegheny Mt. Section; West Virginia Chapter 61 29 Brazil Section 4 7 4 7 Canadian Prairie/Northern Section 113 81 113 81 China Section 5 6 5 6 East Central Section 325 260 East Central Section; East Michigan Chapter 83 60 East Central Section; Indiana Chapter 108 83 East Central Section; Kentucky Chapter 32 25 East Central Section; Northern Ohio Chapter 23 24 East Central Section; SW Ohio Chapter 79 68 Europe Section 13 11 13 11 Florida Section 18 17 162 135 Florida Section; Big Bend Chapter 17 12 Florida Section; Coastal Plains Chapter 21 11 Florida Section; NE Florida Chapter 34 27 Florida Section; SE Florida Chapter 19 15 Florida Section; Tampa Bay Chapter 53 53 Golden West Section 130 127 201 177 Golden West Section; Golden Empire Chapter 27 17 Golden West Section; Mother Lode Chapter 44 33 Grand Canyon Section 51 50 51 50 Greater St. Louis Section 22 19 22 19 Hong Kong Section 5 3 5 3 Korea Section 9 4 9 4 Lake Michigan States Section 139 127 169 154 Lake Michigan States Section; West Michigan Chapter 30 27 Louisiana Section 241 153 285 184 Louisiana Section; SW Louisiana Chapter 44 31 Mexico Section 8 7 8 7 Mid Atlantic States Section 31 27 252 192 Mid Atlantic States Section; Central & Northern NJ Chapter 59 46 Mid Atlantic States Section;
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Your Bill Lower Than the State, Regional and National Averages
    Edison Electric Institute National Data Keeping your bill lower than the state, regional and national averages A comparison of monthly bills for typical residential and business customers Residential 1,000 kWh Small Business 1,500 kWh Typical monthly usage for a home or apartment Examples: office, storefront, farm pumps National Average $135.33 National Average $197.84 South Atlantic $121.99 Southeast $184.91 Florida IOUs $116.35 South Atlantic $179.19 Southeast $116.16 Florida IOUs $178.15 Florida Power Florida Power $145.03 & Light Company $91.84 & Light Company $0 $35 $70 $105 $140 $0 $40 $80 $120 $160 $200 Commercial 40 kW, 10,000 kWh Commercial 500 kW, 180,000 kWh Examples: small manufacturing facility, bank branch office, Examples: school, department store, large call center, grocery store retail store, restaurant, medical office National Average $1,264 National Average $18,763 South Atlantic $1,120 South Atlantic $17,245 Florida IOUs $1,071 Florida IOUs $16,920 Southeast $1,068 Southeast $16,163 Florida Power $936 Florida Power $14,028 & Light Company & Light Company $0 $260 $520 $780 $1040 $1300 $0 $5000 $10000 $15000 $20000 Industrial 1,000 kW, 400,000 kWh Industrial 1,000 kW, 650,000 kWh Examples: manufacturing facility, large school Example: large manufacturing facility National Average $38,380 National Average $53,385 Florida IOUs $36,259 Florida IOUs $51,492 South Atlantic $34,462 South Atlantic $47,897 Southeast $32,763 Southeast $44,477 Florida Power Florida Power $29,735 & Light Company & Light Company $40,247 $0 $10500 $21000 $31500 $42000 $0 $10000 $20000 $30000 $40000 $50000 $60000 Data source: Edison ElectricIndustrial Institute (EEI) 50,000 Typical Bills andkW Average 32,500,000 Rates Report for Summer kWh 2016 based on utility rates effective July 2016.
    [Show full text]